Structural Realism - International Relations (1/7)
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 10. 2014
- Professor John Mearsheimer from the University of Chicago discusses Structural Realism
(Part 1 of 7)
Playlist link - • Understanding Internat...
Transcript link - podcast.open.ac.uk/feeds/3002_...
Study a free course on Rights and justice in international relations at the Open University
www.open.edu/openlearn/people-...
Study Q11 BA (Honours) International Studies
www.open.ac.uk/courses/qualifi...
Explore qualifications in Social Sciences with the OU
www.open.ac.uk/courses/find/so...
The Open University is the world’s leading provider of flexible, high-quality online degrees and distance learning, serving students across the globe with highly respected degree qualifications, and the triple-accredited MBA. The OU teaches through its own unique method of distance learning, called ‘supported open learning’ and you do not need any formal qualifications to study with us, just commitment and a desire to find out what you are capable of.
Free learning from The Open University
www.open.edu/openlearn/
For more like this subscribe to the Open University channel
/ @openlearn_ou
Like us on Facebook: / ouopenlearn
Follow us on Twitter: / oufreelearning
It has FISH on its eastern border and FISH on its western border.
Lol
Dead fish stinks. And when you crap the next morning after eating fish, your crap will stink too
this is like the fuckin jordan peterson lobster thing omg
This phrase is actually really important and has a greater meaning behind it. The US only has two borders, and all the other powerful countries are far way on the other side of the oceans. This makes development and peace much more easier than in Germany, for example, who has more than 10 borders and is surrounded by potential enemies.
@@elbens_gabriel well US has mexico to worry about.
love how he explained it so clearly in only 10 min. meanwhile my prof takes two hours
Mine too 😑
That's because he's a Realist too (neo)
Don't trust your Profs. Hunt them.
Agree, it's silly how much you spend in terms of money and time on a university degree, when there is so much free education out there online. But you need the degree in order to prove your abilities... although the degree itself doesn't mean you know more than a guy that sits at home and watch youtube clips...
i take a billion hours to understand by book that i read
Damn his way to teach is so good. Everything is going in the head. Explains the ideals of top universities.
I'm doing a research paper on structural realism so having mersheimer explain it personally, is amazing!
hmm, i consider myself a offensive realistic neocon without the "neo" in "neo-realism", because of Freud.
The lecturers of the universities have complicated giving a clear explanation for what realism stands for, thank you very much sir, you have absolutely gave me a clear idea of what structural realism is, I will be very lucky to attend one of your lectures.
It's because while Realism is a simple theory to explain, the world is not a place where simple things happen in a straightforward fashion. This is a great baseline introduction, but to really apply it you need to do a ton of case studies of very complex real-world situations. And that's not something that universities can just "give a clear explanation" for.
International Relations exam tomorrow. I do agree with everything he says.
After 7 years this video uploaded,China's prediction is becoming a harsh true
Hats off to this genius man🙏
wow. this is so clear. Thank you very much
Clear, simple & precise! What a perfect way to explain structural realism ! Thank you for your excellency and may uni teachers learn from his skills!!
"yuuman nature"
"yuuman beings"
this ruined the whole video for me
@@TheDannyc1991 it's caused by the youman instinct
4 years after you commented this and here I am watching this as I write my midterm for world politics cracking up at this comment because I cannot unhear him saying "youman" LOL.
Suddenly everything makes so much sense!
This guy is awesome, I was listening to him for a while and then realised it was Mearsheimer when he started using some lines from his book. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics is really good, well worth a read.
Ben Walker Best IR book I've ever read!
Same
So awesome!! Just what i need for my exams
Thanks for making this freely available!
This was produced 7 years ago yet the way he saw China's economic rise is unbelievably true now that we are in 2021. China has indeed showed it wants to be dominant, but not just in Asia alone, but in the world. What leaders have failed to anticipate is how fast and aggressive they want to achieve this goal.
Leaders? Any leader that isn't aware of China's rise must A Be a leader of a tropical island or B on Mars. Particularly their expansion in Africa. China are doing what they Europeans did in the 1870s . With more subtlety
Everyone saw China rise for more than 20 years. This is so obvious to everyone and everyone said so.
Wow… no one could have explained the international situation so well and made it understandable like a cake walk based on real theory… I do support what you explained sir. We are evidently witnessing the same thing as you predicted. Thank you.
Sosi hyi
If you haven’t noticed, everything that John Mearsheimer has had to say, and all of his advice, has all been exactly spot on for the past few decades. Both the US and the world at large would have been doing ourselves a huge favor if we had taken his advice.
Mr. Mearsheimer is my favorite IR theorist. His take on US foreign policy always interests me.
Had a professor try to explain this in a review session today. This guy is so much better
Well, his texts are subject of study for universities around the world... He knows this stuff quite well lol
I mean this guy made the theories
Wonderful (simple) explanation thank you sir
very wonderful lecture. it is the most effective and understandable lecture i have even seen
thank you for being that clear!
The disinterested approach of his while understanding his own theory that he supports is mesmerizing
bestever explanation i found on internet..thx
This guy explains better than 38 pgs that I need to read and 3 hrs of lesson from my teacher..
Many thanks for this useful video . He explained very well, very simple that everyone can understand .
I just started the theories of internasional relations and by watching this video, now i am lovin it
Incredible detail, very helpful.
Super helpful. Great to grasp the foundation to understand realism.
Thank yu very much I really appreciated it.As an IR student
He is one of the original propounders of structural realism bro..# John mearsheimer
That was clear, short and on-point
hours in class while my professor joking < 10 minutes on CZcams
It`s clear for me now.... thank you!!!!!
Good video , simple understand. Thank you
superb explanation, thank you
Two things I want from Mearsheimer: understanding of his theory and his intense gaze. Dude's a predator.
a predator of knowledge
He’s an academic. He’s enthusiastic about his insights and learning. As a diplomat or politician he would need a different affect. He’s an academic.
As a junior highschool, thank you for the easy explanation! This helped me a lot
Thanks, simple understanding 🙏🏻
Excellent lecture on structural realism
Thanks a lot sir . You explained this concept of realism in modern dynamics and alos predicted the rise of China . Great lesson sir
clear, simple and fluent he explained it in effective way
Good job Prof I love your work so much
I love his NY accent. SMOAWLL, YUUMAN, COAWLL
lol very bernie like :) yuuuuman
simple but very effective to understand
Very good explanation 👏
i love you prof#there is no way you can predict the feature without a theory........
This is really dope. I love this video, i like this proffessor
The desire for power might come from fear of being hurt, farther more this desire might come from noble motives that come from places men can't rich but those contents reach to us
I live in NM and when I go to bed am not worrying about being getting attacked at night ,spot on .
I like how he stated his theory of how the international system works without bad mouthing the human nature basis of political realism.
real yuman being and a real hero
Yeah this was very clear, nice explainer!
WELL OUTLINED POINTS NICE CHANNEL
You are simply superb
Great methodology ♥️
"i do not believe that domestic politics...matters very much for how those states behave"
dude you wrote a book called "the israel lobby and US foreign policy"
n4mrogc - i would argue that domestic politics is the milieu wherein the image of israel has been very carefully stage-managed as a process, over many decades, by every corner of the elite - i.e. a special case. but it is a great observation. the domestic grooming is the substructure for the foreign policy consensus, far from the other way around.
i have struggled with this thought as well that on one hand hes a champion of structural realism and on other hand he is explaining domestic factors like israeli lobby,,, the answer to this is subtle -- one, he is saying that realism explains many things but it cannot claim to be perfect,,, second, nations seek power and national interest and it might be the case that US is calculating its national interest wrongly,,, and third, US has not really been tested on Israel policy, as in in one of Mearsheimer's lecture on Israeli lobby, i heard him say that US can listen to israeli lobby coz its so powerful that it is not feeling insecure,,,,,, u can see this changing in times to come as US gets more vulnerable then it will be real test.... hope u got the answers
haha whether it was by luck or accident, you just put the exact sentence i needed to compare and contrast realism from liberalism for my exam, thanks pal xD
@@dingodyno9016 thats why its all theory. This guy holds this as for the most piece higher driver of state behaviour
@Shaving Pvt. Ryan Come back to this comment in 2025.
the individual behavior of a state is a function of the architecture of the international system of which it is an integral part
Mearsheimer you so cool. thanks.
thank you you helped me so much!!!
He is talking more about offensive realism. That states should always maximize there power
Awesome 👏🏻
thank you sir
Very good!
This man is so right, and we are witnessing now in 2021 that to counter China, USA went into AUKUS agreement with Australia and Brian -- and went in to QUAD-4 with India, UK and Japan ..
Upon completion, I concluded that: 'Geopolitics is the combination of both the potential and kinetic energy of civilizations'. Actually learned the origin of the word politics for the first time in my life as well. I'll never see the 'POLICE' the same way I did before.
Any introductory book recommendations ?
Very Clearly Stated !
That was great!
Really useful.
Awesome, best explanation! :)
Balance of power to counter china from becoming a hegemony ,he explained Soo well
can someone explain to me if a theory exists where institutions act to further less, rather than more peaceful relations between state actors? does such a thing even exist?
I have a follow-up question. How does realism explain the end of the Cold War?
Fire video!
Clear simple awsome
I love him❤️
Where can i find more lectures about IR???
He talks about China's intentions to become a Hegemony 8 years ago. And his prediction was spot on. Why don't people listen to this guy!!!!!!
You re brainwashed in 2014
That was only 2015 and 16. It didn’t exactly take a genius to figure that out.
He was saying it in the 90s
Thank
Sir
Thank You 😊
Was there a time before states when there was no subjugation? So when was the anarchy being stated here born? Is there anarchy?
Anarchy as explained here has existed as long as there has been multiple states. Anarchy would only not exist if there was a world government in authority over all states. It may sound odd since there isn't constant war worldwide. Other explanations for the lack of such conditions include liberalism.
i couldnt understand any better
This is the best theory to understand International politics when you are living outside world's superpowers.
Its always great to see the renowned worldwide think tanks of global politics on a CZcams to clear misconception s . Long live Shaiemar
What difference is there from the older theory of realism ?
I like his way to explain the foundation of the realism and the difference between structural realism and the theorie of human nature as its basic subject, like it was argued by morgenthau. Though i can´t agree with the international system being a pure anarchy itself. The anarchy of the international system he is describing is depending on the view of only competing isolated states that persue only their own intentions and reach for power to provide safety. Actually in a world that is getting more and more global there are so much more examples of international institutions that can be seen as actors. Thus anarchy isn´t a unchangeable structure but a structure created by the theoretical view of realism. Realism isolates states not seing the potential of cooperating power of states, international organisations as institutions and regimes that provide global agreements of law, peace and the protection of the environment.
Hes way of speaking and his arguments are really conclusive. But for me the basic thougts of realism are kind of pessimistic and can´t include a peaceful and global future. This way of looking at the world leads to a neo-conservative, and nationalistic foreign policy of the US as a tackled hegemonic super power that increasingly gets into conflict with rising powers of the OECD-States like China.
As final aspect I also criticize that only with international unions the greatest and worrying problems of all human beings and states can be solved. Which are in my opinion the globalization of liberal economics and the question if there can be infinte growth as well as it spreads social injustice caused by its liberal character and its distribution of power (which outsources developing countries). And also the climate change. We can allready see that the developement of the present foreign-policy with trump quitting the Paris climate protection agreement and the focus on bordersecurity and the rising patriotism. In my opinion we should see the world through different eyes and accept that if we want to overwhelm the really overwhelming global problems we have to cooperate and put the selfinterest a side, get to know and trust each other and focus on changing the present system to a system which isnt just build in a very rational structure of economic growth and developement (which actually just works for the most powerful ones) but has the also rational aims and outcomes just as providing a healthy planet for following generations, peace and social justice and equality. Sometimes i think we allready stopped believing and trying to make it possible and just focus to rescue ourselfs at the expense of others.
Well, realism is a theoretical framework for seeing the world the way it is, not the way we wish it to be. It’s to my mind a foundational perspective for international relations if you want to stay alive. The problem with idealistic, non-anarchic systems is that they only work to a point, like laws. To a point, they can serve everyone within the system well when times are good. But times won’t always be good, states won’t always have the luxury of playing nice, often they feel an existential need to break the rules - whether the threat they feel is justified or not is irrelevant, since what matters is that state actors will continue to act on their subjective assessments. If climate change transforms most of the US into a desert wasteland, is there any doubt the US will find reason to justify some incursion into Canada? It could be a negotiated process, but it’s just as likely it will be something more violent. While unthinkable today, people forget Canada was at war with the US a century and a half ago. I don’t discount the role that the idealism fuelled tenets of liberal ideology plays in making the world better. Absolutely. But realism probably plays as much of a role, the two need to go hand in hand, you have to be prepared for the absolute worst always, because the consequences of getting it wrong are so catastrophic (ie extinction). You don’t risk that. Only a fundamental change to our biology or a radical reimagining of our ecosystem (eg free energy for everyone forever) can sustain an idealistic, non-anarchic, liberal world. It’s not going to happen any time soon.
Great reply. I think ( who am I to say) Mearsheimer would suggest the issue is - that we don't trust each other. Ergo anarchy
The absence of a higher international government/authority does not necessarily make states vulnerable to attack, especially when they hold a close alliance with a superpower state I.e. Washington or Moscow
thankyou
he just said over and over you need to be really powerful to have security
shoutout to my besties doing A-Level politics xoxo this topic is hell
Xin cảm ơn
Its not the structure rather innate human nature to pursue a never ending quest for wealth, resources and power. It wants to ensure its dominance perpetually.
I'm prety sure a huge majority of humans don't pursue that quest at all. Human nature arguments should account for every human behaviour, and neither now nor in the entire history one can really say that every human, because of its nature, pursues never ending wealth and power. It is simple not true.
Well...... 2021.... and the gentleman's prediction was right.
wooooow am impressive they he explain i really lover it
When Lenin came up with decree of peace he immediately gave up territory acquired by czarist Russia.. But such a move makes Russia less powerful by definition... How do you explain from realist view... Here domestic factors play role..
Is there a difference between Realism and Neo-Realism?
I disagree with large parts of his theories but he is an amazing teacher.
why u do desagree with him ?????
@@putinelapipe7805Realism has been on the decline ever since the end of the Cold War because the assumption that a nation must be contained to its sphere of influence lest it lead to a great power conflict had been disproved. Countries do also heavily apply ideology to their national foreign policy, Afghanistan and the Taliban and the Sunni Shia conflict are a prime example along with Facist expansion in ww2.
Wow!
I'm a hands-on Constructionist, forced to live within this construct
Very clear speech. But if you don't consider domestic politics, how can you explain dramatic changes in international politics after the French or the Russian Revolutions? Why South Africa gave up its nuclear weapons after the Cold War? Why foreign policies of Carter and Reagan were so different? Do ideologies, values, interests of decision-makers have no impact on international relations? I think Raymond Aron and Richard Ned Lebow, for example, are really more sophisticated and more interesting.
excellent😁