How An Interrogation Expert Spots A LIAR - Chase Hughes
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 13. 09. 2024
- Join me for a snippet from the Chase Hughes interview as we reveal essential techniques for spotting deception. Discover how integrating these techniques and insights into your interactions can boost your ability to detect deception and navigate complex social situations with enhanced confidence and precision.
Episode Highlights:
01:10 - Importance of Detecting Change
02:14 - How Increasing Stakes Can Affect Deception Indicators
03:09 - Effective Questioning Techniques
05:51 - The Punishment Question
07:39 - Emotional Reactions and Visualization
đDream Fest is back this September! Join us for two full days of insightful learning and networking with incredible speakers from Australia and around the world. Connect with like-minded and successful entrepreneurs as you gain valuable knowledge and inspiration. Don't miss this opportunity to elevate your entrepreneurial journey!
Secure your tickets here
dreamfest2024....
Want to manage your life the same way that helped me make $1 million by 28 and travel the world at the same time?
Grab my FREE one-page Life By Design productivity planner below
planner.morgan....
Join the Dream Out Loud Facebook Community
bit.ly/49QXClW
Follow me on Instagram here
/ morgantnelson
Subscribe to my CZcams channel
/ @morgantnelson
Hit that subscribe button to get weekly bombs like this to help you learn the things you should have learned in school..
It helps more than you know so I can bring even bigger and better guests for you
Amen. Iâve read that in America, in excess of 80% of criminal convictions are the result of self incrimination. It is a compelling evidence that criminals are idiots that they subject themselves to police interrogation rather then invoking their civil rights to protect themselves from these techniques.
True story. When my daughter was about 5, she cut her name into our coffee table. When I asked her about it, she said our cat id it! I said, that's great! Imagine how much we can get for a cat that can spell and carve wood. She immediately panicked and confessed because she loved our cat.
You total bastard
! Brilliant !
My sister did something similar. She took a hammer and hit it against the porcelain sink in the bathroom. These were cast-iron covered with porcelain so it just chipped off the porcelain in a few places. Mom and dad ask both myself and my two sisters if they knew anything that had happened. Me and my older sister just said no. My youngest sister was probably about the same age, somewhere around five, and she âPal do itâ. Actually Bal do it.â Pal was our dog..
My parents started saying how thatâs too bad because they really like how this looks and I guess they wonât be able to get Pal to do it again. After a little bit of conversation like this, my sister suddenly waddled off over to the cabinet in the bathroom, grabbed a hammer, and came waddling back sayingâBal not do it. I do it. I do more.â
đźđ. Interesting that a mishap here was blamed on a kitty too. Child was about 5 as well. Gotta love âem!
That is "laughing out loud" hysterical. I don't have kids of my own but from 1966 to 1971 I did childcare for millionaire families in Manhattan the night the regular Nanny was off and I can just imagine one of these kids reacting like that.
One form of lying is telling people you can tell if they are lying.
It's a method of manipulation. Works sometimes, too. Especially if you sneak in some actual tricks which cause them to reveal information that they otherwise shouldn't have.
âJust remember, itâs not a lie if YOU believe itâ
- George Costanza
This guy is wrong thinking that if you're innocent that you won't be nervous about being questioned, I damn near have a heart attack just seeing police cars/lights or store alarms go off.
True đ. Same with border control. đŹ
I don't think I said that in here.
Mmm-hmm... and case law has proven that K-9 hits are 86% Inaccurate. As in "False".
You misunderstood the context of what he was saying.
@@chasehughesofficial You practice pseudoscience and wishful thinking. What you are good at is finding what you want to find.
Working in mental health tells me just some of those questions will make anxious and paranoid people react very differently even when innocent. However, when talking to employees or kids this advice is generally spot on.
absolutely! Do this bait then you will definitely find the culprit
Your totally spot on about people with anxiety,a things associated with that ,but me rage can effect a answer from me. Example ,if I'm full of rage but still trying to be polite but then get asked a very serious set of questions from the 1st answer to the 2nd and 3rd can become very diffrent. So if I get asked a serious (or not ) question and I respond ten the person jokingly questions my integrity I'm likely to blow my cool. And it's the same if the person's asking me say they've had money stolen from them ill probably answer (depending on who it is) twice before my temper gets the better ogmf me. Then the money could be fine ,then there's other questions in "this convoy " but I'm still full of rage the same thing will happen. So people don't think for 1 second that this is 100% set in stone the way to look for a liar because if that was true I'd be a liar 75% of the time
I agree completely
đđŸââïžđđŸââïžđđŸââïž
@@morgantnelson I think you missed curtisbottoms' point. If people are naturally anxious, the 'bait' question will make them give an anxious answer, even if they are innocent. That's not a way of finding a culprit. There are countless examples of people sentenced for crimes they didn't commit just because they seemed nervous, or didn't respond in an expected way to questioning, and later were proved to be innocent.
When my daughter was small a glass of beer on the kitchen table was mysteriously emptied.
My daughter was asked "Did you drink what was in that glass?"
"No daddy" lied my daughter.
"Oh thank goodness! That was poison!"
"WAH! I don't wanna die!"
Right.
đđđđđ
They lie to catch a lie.
đ
Of course people will react differently when the questions get harder. Also, being accused of something you didn't do makes you become angry and/or nervous.
You obviously donât have to deal with a psychopath like so do all the time.
@@starrystarrynight6281 What? lol
Mmm-hmm... and case law has proven that K-9 hits are 86% Inaccurate. As in "False".
People don't like to be accused of something they didn't do..and they get angry..that's expected..it's when you don't get angry when falsely accused that is the tell
Yeah, guys like the interviewee just want some solid conclusion they can take to their bosses. Hierarchies don't care much about truth.
These guys that think they know how everybody would act or handle being questioned is either a pure egotist or a malignant narcissist.
What? Why malignant? So you can tell by this short clip that he's a narcissist, huh? You must have a large ego yourself to make such a bold claim based on hardly any evidence.
Practice what you preach.
@@RafaelStrangiato Marlow the Malignant projecting and blame shifting right there, surely he's hiding something.
They want their job to be streamlined. They want clear answers to take back to their bosses, true or not. After a long enough time, they probably lose sight of what's obvious to us.
Actually, I'm of the opinion that a narcissist could ace the interview. Psychologists say they reinvent themselves and in their mind they didn't do it. They can also pass lie detector tests (not that those are considered dependable).
â@@annham4136you don't have to be a narcissist to believe your own lies (AFAIK) some ordinary liars also believe their own lies
This won't work with people who make false confessions as a result of getting an earful of abuse every day of their life since the day they were born. They're just going to take punishment after punishment that they don't deserve because everything was always their fault.
I've been a professional investigator and interviewer for over 30 years. I've never allowed anyone to falsely confess to something they didn't do. One of the best ways to establish that the confession is true-is to have the suspect walk me through what they did, how they did it, when, how many times, dollar amounts, specific items taken, etc. I also don't accept responses like;, 'If you said I did it, then I guess I did it'.
Exactly why you invoke the 5th and 6th immediately, and don't answer ANY questions.. Maybe you'll blink twice instead of once and this guy decides you're lying.
Absolutely. My wife and I made a deal to never speak with authorities for any reason. I guarantee this clown has coached his kids to never talk.
Just use your 2A rights instead.
@@johndrake3472Iâm not sure you are aware of who this clown is
@@AttackLineConsultingLLC
I couldnât care less.
@@johndrake3472 You commented on a video he was in talking about how he interrogates people, and yet you claim to not care.... yeh maybe you should say nothing online also
What a crock of crap. There are so many holes in these tactics. No wonder we have innocent people sitting in prison and killers roaming free.
no one gets convicted for being nervous. All he's doing is ascertaining if it's worth investigating a person or they can be safely removed from a list of suspects. And if there's overwhelming evidence of guilt that surfaces in the interrogation, they might press for confessions, a slam dunk for them and for the court, or at least know where to focus resources to get material evidence and witnesses.
Iâm a retired federal agent and have had extensive training and experience in interrogations. I learned both of those lines of questioning more than 40 years ago. I can assure you they work.
@williammackie6701 Bud, if your plan to succeed is to manipulate people, I have some really bad news for you.
I'll say it again to you two because it was deleted. Which, by the way, supports my point. If your plan to be successful is to manipulate others, I have some really bad news for you.
This is why defense lawyers tell their clients to STFU.
Even if they`re innocent.
@@brianpark8758 Yes, because cops can misjudge people, particularly if they've already made up their minds you are guilty.
"That's my secret, Cap -- I'm always nervous."
2:49 This one really brought me back. I got called in on a Monday after some drunken college mischief. The Dean said what Chase just said pretty much word for word. Then he asked me a funny question about a minor detail of my prank and burst out laughing.
There are many people who just get nervous around police, immigration or custom officers, though are not hiding anything.
Especially if thereâs a language barrier. Have a fabulous morning, afternoon or evening đđ»đŠđšđŠđș
My husband was police and if I got stopped by an officer. I literally shook âŠpure panicâŠđđđ
You'll catch half of the guilty people and all of the mentally unstable. What a system we have.
Very nice to be given actual facts of things that help. A lot of similarly titled vids don't give tangible info to use. THANK YOU.
I disagree. When being questioned by anybody, even in casual conversations, I'm more focussed on the questioner than on what is required of me, reading the questioners motives and getting annoyed in the process. What he may perceive as my guilt is my inability to hide my suspicion and rising anger, and my built in response of deflecting answers just because FU.
Absolutely! And one only really understands this once you've been a suspect.
The fact that you suspect my being guilty of a crime by the manner in which you are questioning me, would make me very nervous and would probably make me start fidgeting or breathing faster although i'm innocent. I once failed a polygraph test because of this, and got blamed for something I would never do.
Wanna see changes? Ask me my name and age, then interrogate me about either of my parents. đ
The cognitive overload method is excellent because it is a simple concept and once you detect mistakes you can focus on the mistakes. The problem with the skill of detecting deception is it is very easy to detect deception if you know what to look for but if you are not a detective there is not alot you can do with the information unless you want to destroy relationships to get the truth.
I read a while back that statistically the people who are best at detecting liars are often the worst at believing people who are telling the truth. Oh well...
The most valuable thing for me was the chocolate milk story! đđđđ I am SO using that technique next time my kids do something đđ
Disincentivize lying. Tell the person you know they are lying and that while you can't tell what the truth is because they're lying that you'll just assume its the worst possible scenario imaginable.
If you're being interrogated , say these simple words , "I want a lawyer" then don't talk
Never talk to cops,not even in a social settingâŠtheyâre NEVER off duty.
To catch my kids in a lie, is that I ask them a question I already know the answer to.
That is a standard police interviewing technique.
don't answer questions. That is the job of the Attorney.
"Are you recording this? Please do. I do not consent to any unlawful search or seizures, and I invoke my right to remain silent until I speak with my attorney".
Bad people say what you did
â@@garth217So do good people who know about corruption.
FLETC BSD =Context, Clusters, Culture, Change.... the 4 "C's"
This may be true. However talking to a soldier with PTSD (you might not even know this, people dont wear it on a badge) - you will detect changes in how questions are answered depending on how difficult the subject. To this fellow.....any such change is deception.
I was a corporate attorney for my whole career. When I wanted to interview an important witness about a "big" issue I would start small and have the witness bring related documents like expense reports or travel logs or contact logs "for background" to establish a base line. Then slowly I would get into the heart of the interview. If I had evasion issues with the baseline -- I knew I had some real trouble!!!!
I don't trust anyone who wears red and white striped socks....
Funny
Ooo. I love this punishment question method. I'm so gonna use this to call out people on social media's.. đ
Of course one will act differently if you ask them questions that are automatic, vs ones that require memory or thought
The truth may not be "automatic", but it's not nearly as taxing on one's memory and mental processing as deception tends to be.
The questions are rather automatic, pretty standard in format and techniques. Like with anything else, more experience begets proficiency..
They ask questions and listen to answers. A lot.
Calculating "right" or "believable" answers, coming up with a litany of excuses, and remembering any number of various medical/mental conditions, can be quite the chore. Yeah, if one is nervous, they may flub a couple three lines of their script. Although, it's typically not the nervous that's an issue, .
PSA: I am NOT a 'secret intelligence officer'. I was a tobacco-chewing military dude. Not special.
Chase, you are indeed special! Youâre a national treasure and you have a huge fan base †Thank you for sharing your expertise with us.
And a clock lover.
The old tack in the shoe trick lol
Even if he thinks you're lying, this is not ADMISSABLE in court. Unless you confess or have irrefutable evidence his "OPINION" is worthless.
âNot without my attorney.â đ§ââïžđšââïž âI invoke my Fifth Amendment rights.â End of questioning.
Lol.. firstly most people don't have an attorney..lol
Secondly..go pay for a lawyer..throw your money away..
When you get interviewed you are either 1 a witness 2 a 2nd party who may be able to assist
3 a suspect.
The suspect is the last one to be interviewed.
Sometimes I tell someone something and I feel like I'm suddenly nervous and giving indicators that I'm lying, but I'm actually not. How does that come into play?
That means you'll be questioned longer. And eventually the truth will probably reveal itself and that's when you get to go.
Like Japanese Americans in ww2 held in camps then released after the war was over.
Wow. Fascinating overview.
Actually nothing âfascinatingâ about it.
What he didnât do, because he doesnât know, is calibration. Before you can judge someone by their mannerisms, you first need to know what they are and arenât and that takes a very long time to do and under many different circumstances. Do you always feel the same? Do you always react the same way to the same thing? He says you do!
This is really useful.
I was once accused of impersonating a police officer. I agreed to return to the police station for an interview. After hearing the same questions for 45 minutes, I produced a federally issued duty roster with staff members listed as well as contact info for forwarding incident reports. It was an armed certified first responder civilian security job for the feds. The police officer interviewing me was fired years later for bad behavior. I knew about interviewing technique from prior training during a firearms course, years before getting the security job.
Due to people I hung around with I have been interrogated more than a few times. Every time I was completely in the dark about what they were asking me about. Not a clue, no idea at all. Regardless the various Interrogators were 100% certain I was guilty, involved or knew something. Ridiculous waste of time. Not impressed!
Hopefully you have a lawyer now.
If a person with coin, connections, crews, clout, corrupt cronies, and other shady jabronies wants to make you seem guilty, brother... there is NOTHING you can do. You'd be goin' down like The Hurricane. No legit evidence required; they'd just cook it up, baby. đ
Many years ago, I knew a man who was Gestapo and he gave me the ins and puts to get someone to spill their outs without realizing they were spilling their guts. It worked like this: you scared the crap put of someone before you interrogated them. Then the interrogation would "interrogate" by putting the person at ease by talking to them about totally irrelevant subjects. Eventually, the subject would divulge information they didn't realize they were divulging. This method, e said, worked fine but only of the subject knows that if the interrogation already knew everything they wouldn't bother engaging in interrogation in the first place. It's like the police saying to a subject, "we already have the evidence to convict you, so you may as well talk," and the subject having enough brain cells to realize that if there was enough evidence then there is no need for a confession. Likewise, pulling the, "your buddy has already confessed" only works on idiots. By the same token, this former Gestapo officer (who was later VOPO after the war) knew that torture generally resulted in unreliable and bogus information. Simply talking to someone in pleasant and apparently harmless and irrelevant subjects usually gets you the information or clues you need to have and the subject doesn't even realize it. You don't have to even worry about them lying or being deceptive. The exception is when you have a subject who has a higher IQ than the interrogator.
Comparing testimony to proven facts and getting the subjects to unwittingly reveal information are the only two legit methods of interrogation. Everything else is just harassment.
i notice this tactic used in the workplace, most people looking for either gossip or just information gathers, they will start by putting you at ease talking about general things then they make a statement or open ended remark with a lot of pauses and awkward silences and wait for you to fill in the blanks. The key is to say as little as possible and embrace their awkward silences otherwise you will walk away feeling emotionally manipulated. very sad world.
LEO have profound mistrust of non-LEO. Combine that with a confirmation-bias aimed at achieving charging and conviction, because of quotas, and you can guarentee a skewed observation of interviewees.
My favorite part has always been no dialog...period. đ Analys, that shit.
We just installed new telepathic cameras that read people's thoughts. I need air. Going to go out for a walk. Do you need any water or anything?
The only answer you ever give a cop is âLawyer. Now.â
I would respond to him with-âwhat were you thinking with those red clown socksâ?
Ask a question to which you know the answer. Don't stop there, either. Mix it in with questions you DON'T know the answers for and other subtle chit-chat before popping the secret "I know something you don't know I already know" shenanigans. đȘđâïž Works like a charm.
Easy way to spot someone who is lying - when they sit and tell you that they can spot people lying. Here especially, imagine being asked where you live and how many brothers and sisters you have, and then later a question you immediately know means the 2 guys in the room suspect you of committing a serious crime. And you think you wouldn't change how you answer that latter question? Of course you'll change, you'll realise the cops suspect you. Whether you did the crime or not you're going to be careful what you say because you know they're filming and recording your answers and if can they can show one tiny aspect of your answer isn't true they'll be claiming that's because you're lying etc etc. That's why the smart person never talks to the police and asks for a lawyer - whether they are guilty or not - because all the police are trying to do is convict you. Whether you are guilty or not. The pressure on them is to secure a conviction for their stats and they don't care at al who that is.
And this 'raising the stakes" is what ranges from mild threats to torture - and it's well established that people don't tell the truth under duress - they will confess to crimes they have not done and could not have done. All the US cops do is to have legalised duress to make it sound like it's an 'interrogation technique', sure they're not pulling out fingernails but the whole objective is to get innocent or guilty people to confess. The notion that if you didn't kill someone you'd just nonchalantly sit there while a cop subtly threatens you or implies they have evidence linking you to a murder and only the killer would get stressed is laughable nonsense. This is how you spot a liar - the guy is sitting there waving his hands spouting complete and total horseshit.
You should be much more wary of the person who answers the questions the same - because that likely means they either lack emotion, and/or they've rehearsed their answer. People who tell you they know if someone is lying from observing them are lying. That's how you spot a liar. People who claim to be able to do something that you can easily demonstrate in a double-blind experiment they actually have no more ability to do above chance - in the past that used to be psychics and other charletons. Now it's people claiming to use 'body language' to detect lying - they're trying to put a scientific spin on it - but it doesn't work.
"Did you just FART?"
I'm no criminal, but I have been interrogated twice concerning things for which I was guilty. The first time was by a police officer at the station for assisting theft at a gas station at which I worked. The second was by a lieutenant when I was in army infantry basic training for lying to get a security clearance. I'm not sure what I did, but both times I got away with it. It's a skill I try to use as little as possible as I'm a compulsively honest person.
Good tips, but no system is foolproof. There are general patterns to behavior, but not everyone fits these patterns. The techniques described here are a good starting point and useful during interrogation.
THIS is why you always get a lawyer and don't say anything.. đ
Well I know it was supposed to be an illustration how well the punishment question works, but honestly, based on the responses, not only I would say the son did it, but it's also clear that whoever did it, is more reasonable regarding punishment. It's just some damn chocolate milk spilled, nothing too bad. However, his daughter's mental state is concerning. If I were her father, I would watch out for subtle sadistic behavior... As for the punishment, I would make the kid clean up the mess and yeah, no more chocolate milk in the living room until you learn how not to spill it. And plot twist: I don't recall having ever spilled chocolate milk in my mom's living room when I was a kid, so the reasonable countermeasures are hardly a cocksure indicator of guilt... I hope law enforcement has more reliable indicators. Other than spotting change too. If I realized the person interrogating me may _really_ believe I did something, I would probably get stressed even if I did not do it. My freedom and my future depends on the person believing me, and if I see that he is clearly convinced of my guilt, I would probably just remember all the cases I learned about people being convicted wrongfully. I _really_ hope law enforcement is not as confident about their methods as this guy shows because if they are, that's really concerning.
And yes, as others already mentioned: just state that you want your attorney and you are remaining silent.
Them thinking you did it is not enough, they have to be able to reasonably prove you did something - if it can be reasonably proven, then that is why you would be concerned.
Also, the daughter was probably pissed that the brother was happy for her to be implicated in something she didn't do.
You have just cause to be worried about how cops handle themselves and being wrongfully accused and charged. It's actually happened to me.
If I spilled milk on the carpet, I'd say "lawyer". Don't care if I did it or not. This guy is a monster. Subjective observation to ruin lives is predatory, and his little "cute anecdote" with his own children shows that. Good grief. 1 in 10 of us are psychopaths.
Yeah, your parents will hire a lawyer on the spot. Makes sense!
How are lives being ruined? How are lives not being saved?
I was brought in and questioned as a witness in HS for SA at a party. I was never even in the house, sorry to date myself but was high/smoking and playing hacky sack and listening to Korn with my buddies outside. However, i was still nervous as hell and the detective was like "we know you saw something, are covering for someone" (I wasnt) but his method was just aggressive lying and putting lies in my friends mouths i know they wouldnt say. Just a clown of a detective but as a kid still made me nervous. And very cautious about specifically detectives lying.
never succumb to questioning without a lawyer present ... give as little information as possible ... when in doubt , refuse to answer
The way to be a good liar is to be bad at small lies.
My face hasnât stopped itching since the video started. đ
Just like every interrogation instructor who thinks he's got it figured out, he's biased in interpreting stress as guilt. If the suspect doesn't trust you, or if you're interrogating them very harshly, you're going to see "Desdemona's fear." They know they didn't do it, but they're scared that they can't convince YOU that they didn't do it. They fear that they're going to be punished for something they didn't do. That can produce real terror that's every bit as stressful as guilt, and that will look like guilt if all you're looking for is signs of stress and calling it evasiveness.
None of these techniques will be needed once our phones can read people's biometrics like a polygraph and determine truth from fiction.
Everyone lies. When I was a kid my sister got a detective kit. She wrapped a box of cookies in foil. Someone ate some. She accused me. I gave her my finger prints and she said it was me! It was my brother! That was in 1973. To this day every time we talk I say I never stole those cookies. I think she believes me but man it drives me nuts. Being falsely accused sucks.
"If you are innocent, that won't cause you any stress."
I've been falsely accused, hard to recall anything more stressful than having no idea about what you are being accused of. This is abusive tactics, and the stuff police are trained to say to convince juries it isn't coercive.
There is no condition where an innocent being interrogated isn't stressful.
There is no circumstance one should voluntarily sit for an interrogation or interview with law enforcement, and instead one should rely on rights against self incrimination while refusing to participate without council. The deck is stacked, and his lie about "causing no stress to the innocent" is all the proof necessary to show it.
good stuff
If you are answering questions, youâve already lost. Learn your rights.
Reckon they'll get Will Patton to play him in the movie? đ
What about naturally anxious people who have already raised the stakes internally?
What do you think should happen to someone who took a cookie out of the cookie jar?
I think they should be treated really kindly and asked if they want another cookie.
I'd get VERY nervous if interviewed by someone wearing a shiny black T-shirt with a collar!
To detect liars one has to ask the same things again and again. People making up a lie have to remember the big lie and all the thousand little lies surrounding it and this becomes quite complex after time. Honest people just have to remember one truth. Honest people will always tell the same facts, even using different language. Lying people will always use exactly the same phrases because that's the only way they can remember their lies.
Do not talk to cops
Do not answer questions
These people are collections agents after your assets
So IMMEDIATE flasw in his tactic. All it takes is to interview someone who has been emotionally and mentally abused and every single thing he said to do to catch a liar here will trigger them into a panic attack, they will say anything to get safe. its a self defence response and very VERY cruel to trigger. Not everyone is a liar, Not everyone is a cool cucumber when interogated. The more ANGRY some get, cussy and enraged, the more TRUTH they are trying to express. Wow..no wonder people are going to jail left n right. *shakes head and walks away*
Has his ability to detect lies been tested and quantified along with false positives/negatives? If so, how?
It's interesting, that he is lieing about the periodic table and the guy interviewing him is lieing about having seen it.
The one question is "is there any reason X might have happened".
I love that leather armchair.
I think his missus was lying when he asked her if he looked good in those trainers and socks, and she said yes darling.
Really good liars are really good at it.
This guy is full of it!
Yep, full of facts and information. Heâs a renowned expert in his field and an insanely sharp analyst. The best body language expert alive.
@@pochamocha23 âRenownedâ? Nobody has ever heard of this guy. Funny.
It doesn't deal with memory issues. People with memory issues either can't remember an incident at all, or they have a completely different memory of it that they believe with every part of their being that is what happened. So if they believe they didn't do it, how do you trip them up? Same for people who lie and believe their own lies, I'm talking the pathological liars. They believe absolutely that their version is the true version. I find that they tend to dismiss out of hand anything that doesn't align with their lies. Like, no, didn't happen. Even when confronted with evidence, undeniable, and with a timeline, undeniable. They stick to the lie as it slowly unravels, and then you're setting them up. That's the only answer that works in their minds.
But what happens if someone has an overreactive imagination and starts to respond like he did the crime?
Interrogation 101. Establish a baseline.
Moral of the story? Tell your interrogator to go $#&@ himself. If there's pain involved, lie.
All could always tell when my ex wife was lying to me. Her lips moved.
Can a honest person demonstrate these markers naturally- just from his/her personality or other factors?
LAWYER!!!
The IS THERE ANY REASON question is weak. The answer is I HAVE NO IDEA. Itâs not a lie, and answers the question.
Same with the WHAT SHOULD THE PUNISHMENT BE. I HAVE NO IDEA is the answer.
I heard a Body Behavioralist talk about the limbic system. A separate part of your brain that has 1 function which is self preservation, The flight freeze fight response.It's connected to your brain stem and cerebrum. Like the Brainstem functions it's also autonomous. An is also a detective's best friend, especially if he can read body language. The detective of authoritative figure asking questions that can put you away for your dirty deeds, The limbic system will engage, and perceive him as a threat, this syyem focused on survival hijacks your brain, and can alter the functions in your brainstem to survive what ever problem your facing, and also is a source for a lot of the clusters mentioned. The creative side of your brain takes a back seat, Other's are elevated, It's a defense mechanism and it's easily triggered, unfortunately for people practicing the art of deception, they can't disable that part of their brain.
Donât speak to the police.
Samuel asked David the same thing about the punishment for David's crime in his adultery with Uriah's wife and sending Uriah off to die in battle to cover it up.
What about those of us that have been railroaded and therefore we are scared of the legal system because we have been shown that it doesn't matter if your innocent or not.đą
Then you get to make jokes the whole time cuz nothing really matters
@@Kyle-nm1kh no we get hyper vigilant because of the PTSD and when someone says that this next question is really going to matter we then shift our focus to 220% because we know that one wrong word will be used against us. It doesn't matter if we are innocent the cops will just try any wrong wording to get a charge placed. I'm sorry but your theory has some major issues. đ€· And don't just try protecti g your ego and just making out I know nothing. Because I can sort a lier from miles off. Always have always will đ€·đđđïž
Well austics, people who are naturally restless or people adhd. These mental conditions makes an interrogators job next to impossible to do without getting sued compared with the average population.
Whatâs up with the Dr Seuss socks?đ€Ł
"Conversation Starter".
love the socks and shoes
Called individual style. You should look into it.
â@@thangknowa3288Ahhhhhh... đđđŒ
Never. Ever. Talk . To. The. Police.
This is not a concept you can train someone in as quickly as some police training does
Hey, cool! Pseudoscience. After this let's talk about phrenology and healing crystals.
Human beings are lousy at detecting deception. A change in baseline behaviors can mean a lot of different things.