Yeah that what I taking about. Is the only reason I play RDA post the structure deck cause of Bystial I was convinced of playing the deck and is super consistent.
@@marc-andrerivest1247 Nice ya well for me is a big lol cause I really wasn't too much of a fan of the master of faster like only half fan of him but when I saw post the new structure deck that you can play it with Bystial and also an early article in Tcgplayer infinite when the structure deck was coming soon calling it the new Bystial dragon deck I said you know what I am convinced, I want now not only to play this deck but every Bystial variant deck out their cause my first ever was dragon Link Bystial my most favorite deck in all of yugioh no matter what been playing it since released back in 2019 when I started playing it.
I noticed that he is not running Pot of Prosperity. Most people who have uploaded their RDA deck ( OTS First place or YCS Participant ), plays it. I wonder why he did not play it? And I also wonder what deck did he lose to and how did he lose..
@@user-vr5uw6gd6f Good point. Maybe I should just cut mine as well.. Planning to play TCG again after almost 18 years ( playing Duel Links though ), and this deck caught my attention because I played it to get to multiple King of Games in Duel Links..
@@BGLoscar I definitely recommend doing so. It's a nice card that almost guarantees you get your calamity lock.... But with 3 pots in the main it makes it so hard to fit crossout.... Which IMO this deck loses hard to disruptions like droll and ash
@@user-vr5uw6gd6f Yeah, I bought a Crossout playset at TCGPlayer and will probably run Triple Ash because she's too good, then one Nib and 1 Droll for crossout targets. The deck can still play through some disruptions, based on what I've seen in some feature duels in YT but you gotta have the perfect hand to push through disruptions.
@sinky. I haven't tried them but Baronne is good in theory for late game when you have less resources and want to simplify the game state. more useful than Typhon that's for sure
@@ShoXwavee i understand the thought process, i just feel they're too niche to go into incase you do get locked dark dragons. I play chaos angel, no tuner needed, and everytime you bring it back from being banised or just special it you banish something, something you could perhaps look into, cheers for the replies!
You could also play triple prosperity, you take out a droll, nib and a druidswurm and still be 40 plus added consistency, and for the extradeck you could play two-offs
its not. I've brought this deck to two locals recently and I've bricked once in maybe 30 duels. Sure it loses to ash, droll, and Nibiru pretty hard if you cant get crossout or called by, but other than that it's very consistent, grindy, and puts up good interruptions. granted my build is different, I run 3 stone sweeper and 1 foolish having 13 cards to get to soul 1cc, but in theory you can also get to it with bone archfiend (by sending targeting himself to decrease, sending vision from deck, then searching crimson gaia to add soul) but your end board is much weaker. Bystials give it a good grind game engine and some follow-up after getting ashed if you draw well.
No obsessive uvualoop?
Yeah that what I taking about. Is the only reason I play RDA post the structure deck cause of Bystial I was convinced of playing the deck and is super consistent.
Haha awesome, thanks for the interest
@@HakunaMyData Sure thing
I won my locals 2 Weeks ago with rda i have Been playing this Deck since high speed raiders i was super happy when they announce the structure Deck
@@marc-andrerivest1247 Nice ya well for me is a big lol cause I really wasn't too much of a fan of the master of faster like only half fan of him but when I saw post the new structure deck that you can play it with Bystial and also an early article in Tcgplayer infinite when the structure deck was coming soon calling it the new Bystial dragon deck I said you know what I am convinced, I want now not only to play this deck but every Bystial variant deck out their cause my first ever was dragon Link Bystial my most favorite deck in all of yugioh no matter what been playing it since released back in 2019 when I started playing it.
You can’t use discard bone archfiend to ss itself by discarding itself
I think he meant I’d you had 2 of him in your hand you can discard one to bring out the other. In that case yes you can
yes can and it doesn't say anyware on the card that you can't plus I actually played and still have red Dragon Archfiend
It's an honor to get wrecked hy this guy on a weekly basis
Lmao amazing
I try assault synchro and it's a very good extender
Assault synchron is decent... But once again fitting enough hand traps and crossout is the issue
I noticed that he is not running Pot of Prosperity. Most people who have uploaded their RDA deck ( OTS First place or YCS Participant ), plays it. I wonder why he did not play it? And I also wonder what deck did he lose to and how did he lose..
Pot of P is kinda redundant. You. Have basically like 12 starters to your 1 card combo
@@user-vr5uw6gd6f Good point. Maybe I should just cut mine as well.. Planning to play TCG again after almost 18 years ( playing Duel Links though ), and this deck caught my attention because I played it to get to multiple King of Games in Duel Links..
@@BGLoscar I definitely recommend doing so. It's a nice card that almost guarantees you get your calamity lock.... But with 3 pots in the main it makes it so hard to fit crossout.... Which IMO this deck loses hard to disruptions like droll and ash
@@user-vr5uw6gd6f Yeah, I bought a Crossout playset at TCGPlayer and will probably run Triple Ash because she's too good, then one Nib and 1 Droll for crossout targets. The deck can still play through some disruptions, based on what I've seen in some feature duels in YT but you gotta have the perfect hand to push through disruptions.
If you dont play crossout or play board breakers prosp its a big out and a opcion to enable dispater
IDK why you play the TY-PHON, you can't go into it, you're locked to DARK DRAGON SYNCHROS from the extra deck, TY-PHON is a friend, and an XYZ..
It came up for me once or twice when they flip D Barrier
@@ShoXwavee What Barrone and Draco? Seeming they aren't Dragons either?
@sinky. I haven't tried them but Baronne is good in theory for late game when you have less resources and want to simplify the game state. more useful than Typhon that's for sure
@@ShoXwavee i understand the thought process, i just feel they're too niche to go into incase you do get locked dark dragons. I play chaos angel, no tuner needed, and everytime you bring it back from being banised or just special it you banish something, something you could perhaps look into, cheers for the replies!
@sinky. yeah that's a good option
Interesting side deck to play with crossout
My boy Seth is the king of cooks
Lmao gotta stop that Droll
I was in your hood today :)
@@HakunaMyData Nah I'm banned from Fox that's anywhere but my hood 💀💀
@@HakunaMyData congrats on 1st in Swiss btw. I didn't see, did you make top 4?
Oh he was on Bystial hmmm
Ya is that standard
My boy gotta cut his nails
this look really bricky
on ten hand i have like 2 playable hand
I can say the opposite I had only one hand that wasn’t playable super fun build
You could also play triple prosperity, you take out a droll, nib and a druidswurm and still be 40 plus added consistency, and for the extradeck you could play two-offs
its not. I've brought this deck to two locals recently and I've bricked once in maybe 30 duels. Sure it loses to ash, droll, and Nibiru pretty hard if you cant get crossout or called by, but other than that it's very consistent, grindy, and puts up good interruptions. granted my build is different, I run 3 stone sweeper and 1 foolish having 13 cards to get to soul 1cc, but in theory you can also get to it with bone archfiend (by sending targeting himself to decrease, sending vision from deck, then searching crimson gaia to add soul) but your end board is much weaker. Bystials give it a good grind game engine and some follow-up after getting ashed if you draw well.