I have had this lens for many years and used it on my crop body and it was my general walk around lens. It works great. I bought a 70-200 f4 IS to go along with it at the same time (I did not know much on what I needed but was just excited). This lens made my 70-200mm obsolete because the 105mm range covered all my needs. If I needes really far reach, 200mm was not enough anyway. If my main lens was a 18-55mm range, then that higher telephoto would be more needed. This is simply a do everything lens.
Funny i was just looking into this lens and your video popped up on here for it. Thank you for the great information. Looking forward to buying one now and trying it out. Even better suggestion about going with the mark iv. Thank you.
I thought about trading my 24-105mm f4 for a 24-70mm f2.8, because of a lot the reviews were not as favorable as compared to the 'scary-sharp' reviews the 24-70mm was getting. Some people even said the lens was not sharp and kind of slow. I really started thinking that it was more of a 'kit-lens' according to those reviews. My 24-105mm came with a Canon 6D FF camera vs 1. I paid $900 for both camera and lens in great condition ! After shooting a couple of weddings with this lens I soon came to love it. I can't say much for the focusing on the 6D, but when it focused the pictures were scary-sharp. I was really impressed with this lens and it stayed on my camera most of the time during a wedding unless I wanted to shoot really wide-angle with my 16-35mm f2.8 (which is another great lens). I was able to capture razor sharp images standing on a balcony about 150+ yards away with this lens in dim lighting conditions, no problem. This lens is not going anywhere, even if I do decide to get the 24-70mm f2.8, but right now that's not really a main priority.
Thanks for this review, trying to made a decision between this lens and the Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8. I want something which is good for video and stills. Thank you.
I have one and it’s very much a jack of all trades, master of none. Yes, you can take it to the zoo and snap pictures of animals... but you’ll miss the extra range. You can take it to a portrait shoot... but you’ll wish you could come down to f/2.8. But anything in between and landscapes? You’ll probably be fine!
It's also the perfect lens for shooting action sports, particularly in poor conditions, as you won't need to switch lenses in the field. Also ALL lenses have a 1.6 crop on an APSC in relation to the focal lengths they state. Even a lens designed for a APSC sensor is still going to say the full frame focal lengths on it.
I just joined your subscription and really like your presentation. I own a Canon RP with a RF 24-105 mm F4 L IS USM and a Canon EF 50mm STM 1:18. Both of these are terrific for an enthusiast like myself. I would love your recommendation on a long range telephoto that I don’t have to mortgage my house for.
Thankyou for this video tutorial I bought this lens due to it`s price at the time but have since discovered it is part of the bundle pack that Canon gave out with the 6D ( I purchased the lens and my 6D seorately) so not really knowing what this lens was for I have to say it was the BEST accidental purchase I`ve ever made and I have now found I grab this one over my 200mm Unless I am shooting a concert or something in low light .. I love this lens and I never leave home without it .. I have discovered as well the photos are brighter on my 1500D than the 6D but I still would not part with my 6D .. It`s extremely useful as it can be used on both my APSC camera which I use if I`m just out and about but when doing photography for Clients I grab my 6D so it`s nice to know that I can add this lens and my 35mm lens and I am set for the day .. my poor 200mm lens hasn`t seen the light of day since I bought this 2 years ago for $400 second hand
I wouldn't upgrade unless you're usually at 70mm and cropping. I think most folks save for a 70-200mm go along with it. By the time you sell them one you've got and buy the replacement, you'd be a significant way down the road to having the money to buy the other lens.
@@zulfphotography they're both great, it would be a hard decision if he didn't already own one of them. L glass is great and there aren't really any bad ones, just ones that may not apply to what you're doing.
@@kahzmedia Auto focus does not work, but I am usually behind the camera, so I do not need auto focus. If I need to be in front of the camera, the tilta nano does the job for me. When it pertains to IS, it doesn't say in camera, but I believe the lens auto focus is working as my footage is decently smooth.
Yeah, it has a versatile focal length and the useful IS, but I haven't used mine that was purchased a few years back because of the slower f/4. My go-to lenses are mostly the Lens Trinity and 85 f/1.2 L II. Not trendy but just a traditional collection that can stand the test of time.
Great review of this lens! Im about to buy my very first camera- a canon c100 mkii and I was recomended to get this lens Canon EF 24-105 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Is this the exact same lens tht you have reviewed or is it an older model? (im a real novice with all this so currently learning at the school of CZcams!) Also I was looking at a really high quality art lens such as Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM lens for canon whch is alot more expensive but im told is a very nice lens. Now the first lens covers more range and is cheaper but the latter is a higher quality. Which would you say would be the best to get the most out of my camera and also if my budget stretches to both lenses is it worth getting both of them or are they just covering the same ground and thus not worth it? Would love your thoughts on this. Thanks alot!
The lens you mention is not the lens he talks about. He speaks of a constant f4 L lens (mark I or Mark II is still the same design). The lens you speak of may have a bettet motor for video but is probably a lower quality lens overall and does not have a constent aperture. But for video, that Sigma 18-35mm 1.8 is great.
I great video but I have a question for you if I have the Canon 24 to 105 and it's strictly an F4 aperture does that mean that no matter where I set my camera the aperture on the lens doesn't change therefore there's no use in shooting in aperture priority mode with this lens correct
Nice video and very informative! I just buy my first DSLR camera Canon EOS 800D ! This lens is to expensive for me right now! The kit lens is a 18-55mm ! What cheap all around lens should I buy? Thanks!
Thinking about this lens for static car stuff/walk about. I have 10-20mm sigma and a 18-50mm sigma f2.8 with a 70-200m canon L. Hoping 24mm is wide enough on a crop sensor
Beave not sure man, I also have a Crop, though I’m considering Full Frame. I feel like 24 might be a bit tight in some cases! But if you’re keeping the 10-20, then it could be very nice!
Its funny. I’ve had this lens for 15 years. Came with the 5d mk II. It’s razor sharp and bores me. Its really great at rendering what I see but never transforms the scene into something other. So I rarely use it. I tend to go for a prime that can pop or move my feet so I can use a closer zoom. It’s just never been my ride.
I used this lens for many years on a crop and I love it. But now I bought a 35 prime 1.4 and didn't use the 24-105 anymore. Prime charged the way I take pictures now.
i just want to buy 1 lens that's going to make my pictures awesome i want a lens that take great pictures in low light help me pick a great lens that i can also take group photos with
@@KellanReck 2.8 is a deal breaker, but i´m concern about image quallity of de 24-70 I (used) vs 24-205 II (brand new one), can´t decide yet. thanks for the answer
Can't argue about the versatility of this lens, but from the image quality standpoint, IMHO, this lens shouldn't be in L category. I have this lens, the chromatic aberration in this lens is high, and as you show it in your video, the IQ on the edge is really not good. I think, IMO, instead of buying this lens, I'd prefer to buy the Tamron 24-70 F2.8 G2 instead. Yes, you can't get the 104mm, but for most portrait photos the 70mm can handle it quite right. However, the RF 24-105mm F4 L, is a superb lens.
But I prefer 24-70 f2.8. 105mm is not really very zoomed in compare to 70mm. But you lose 1 stop of apeature. If it is a 24-120 f4 I think make it more useful.
What's your favorite Canon lens?
@@path8productions WoW! Is that THE Pat Henderson?
85 1.4 L IS
EF 16-35mm F4 L IS. I shoot landscape most of the time.
24-70mm f2.8
I see myself reaching more and more for my 100mm 2.8 non L lens. Its great for the stuff I'm shooting at the moment
I have had this lens for many years and used it on my crop body and it was my general walk around lens. It works great. I bought a 70-200 f4 IS to go along with it at the same time (I did not know much on what I needed but was just excited). This lens made my 70-200mm obsolete because the 105mm range covered all my needs. If I needes really far reach, 200mm was not enough anyway. If my main lens was a 18-55mm range, then that higher telephoto would be more needed. This is simply a do everything lens.
I have had this lens for 6 months now and I love it! most of my photos are taken by it, super powerful!
Really like how you covered this great job you spoke well and covered the key points very nicely
Thank you! Appreciate that
@@KellanReck it be great to see what you score on the ultimate photographer quiz czcams.com/video/tEBGmhVZhyg/video.html
Funny i was just looking into this lens and your video popped up on here for it. Thank you for the great information. Looking forward to buying one now and trying it out. Even better suggestion about going with the mark iv. Thank you.
Very tempting. What do you think of this slightly less expensive alternative: Canon EOS 6D Mark II EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Kit?? Thanks.
I thought about trading my 24-105mm f4 for a 24-70mm f2.8, because of a lot the reviews were not as favorable as compared to the 'scary-sharp' reviews the 24-70mm was getting. Some people even said the lens was not sharp and kind of slow. I really started thinking that it was more of a 'kit-lens' according to those reviews. My 24-105mm came with a Canon 6D FF camera vs 1. I paid $900 for both camera and lens in great condition !
After shooting a couple of weddings with this lens I soon came to love it. I can't say much for the focusing on the 6D, but when it focused the pictures were scary-sharp. I was really impressed with this lens and it stayed on my camera most of the time during a wedding unless I wanted to shoot really wide-angle with my 16-35mm f2.8 (which is another great lens). I was able to capture razor sharp images standing on a balcony about 150+ yards away with this lens in dim lighting conditions, no problem. This lens is not going anywhere, even if I do decide to get the 24-70mm f2.8, but right now that's not really a main priority.
I’m new to photography and this video was helpful thank you
Thanks for this review, trying to made a decision between this lens and the Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8. I want something which is good for video and stills. Thank you.
This guy is super comfy on camera. Eyes are easy to look at.
I have one and it’s very much a jack of all trades, master of none. Yes, you can take it to the zoo and snap pictures of animals... but you’ll miss the extra range. You can take it to a portrait shoot... but you’ll wish you could come down to f/2.8. But anything in between and landscapes? You’ll probably be fine!
It's also the perfect lens for shooting action sports, particularly in poor conditions, as you won't need to switch lenses in the field. Also ALL lenses have a 1.6 crop on an APSC in relation to the focal lengths they state. Even a lens designed for a APSC sensor is still going to say the full frame focal lengths on it.
I just joined your subscription and really like your presentation. I own a Canon RP with a RF 24-105 mm F4 L IS USM and a Canon EF 50mm STM 1:18. Both of these are terrific for an enthusiast like myself. I would love your recommendation on a long range telephoto that I don’t have to mortgage my house for.
Excellent video. Keep up the good work.
Thanks, will do!
Nice video my friend. I just bought this lens last night and got it for $325 and it’s in MINT condish 👏🏼👌🏻from Denver Colorado
Thankyou for this video tutorial I bought this lens due to it`s price at the time but have since discovered it is part of the bundle pack that Canon gave out with the 6D ( I purchased the lens and my 6D seorately) so not really knowing what this lens was for I have to say it was the BEST accidental purchase I`ve ever made and I have now found I grab this one over my 200mm Unless I am shooting a concert or something in low light .. I love this lens and I never leave home without it .. I have discovered as well the photos are brighter on my 1500D than the 6D but I still would not part with my 6D .. It`s extremely useful as it can be used on both my APSC camera which I use if I`m just out and about but when doing photography for Clients I grab my 6D so it`s nice to know that I can add this lens and my 35mm lens and I am set for the day .. my poor 200mm lens hasn`t seen the light of day since I bought this 2 years ago for $400 second hand
I just bought the 24-70mm 2.8 lens for my camera and loving it. Now I'm really considering the 24-105mm. Thanks for sharing Kellan.
Both are great lenses!
You loose a few stops but get IS in the 105 it's a tough one but u went for the 24 70 for the 2.8 it's great in low light
I wouldn't upgrade unless you're usually at 70mm and cropping. I think most folks save for a 70-200mm go along with it. By the time you sell them one you've got and buy the replacement, you'd be a significant way down the road to having the money to buy the other lens.
@@zulfphotography they're both great, it would be a hard decision if he didn't already own one of them. L glass is great and there aren't really any bad ones, just ones that may not apply to what you're doing.
With this lens, I get f2.6 on my bmpcc4k with .64 metabones speedbooster. Since I been using this combination it's been a whole new lens to me.
Hi! Does AF & IS work with this combination?
@@kahzmedia Auto focus does not work, but I am usually behind the camera, so I do not need auto focus. If I need to be in front of the camera, the tilta nano does the job for me. When it pertains to IS, it doesn't say in camera, but I believe the lens auto focus is working as my footage is decently smooth.
I agree. Very versatile lens.
It's worth mentioning that the the newer version is quite a bit larger, heavier and more expensive while offering no real improvement.
I've just bought a Canon full frame and am thinking about getting this lens until I can afford the newer 24-70mm ii lens.Thanks for the review bro!
You'll love it!
@@KellanReck Sure. But you should consider the Sigma Art as well. Both the 24-70 and the 24-105 are even better than the Canon lenses
Yeah, it has a versatile focal length and the useful IS, but I haven't used mine that was purchased a few years back because of the slower f/4. My go-to lenses are mostly the Lens Trinity and 85 f/1.2 L II. Not trendy but just a traditional collection that can stand the test of time.
Yoo I had to replay that snap to make sure the lens doesnt pop up from nowhere. Nice reason thought, I'm considering gettin one
Off topic but what do you think of the canon 18-135 mm lens? Currently debating between the stm and usm
killing it bro
Thank you, Cameron!
Seen this lens a lot online for sale but I went ahead and bought the 24-70 f2.8L instead since I already own the 70-200 f/2.8 IS L lens.
Pointless
Great review of this lens! Im about to buy my very first camera- a canon c100 mkii and I was recomended to get this lens
Canon EF 24-105 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM
Is this the exact same lens tht you have reviewed or is it an older model? (im a real novice with all this so currently learning at the school of CZcams!)
Also I was looking at a really high quality art lens such as
Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM lens for canon whch is alot more expensive but im told is a very nice lens.
Now the first lens covers more range and is cheaper but the latter is a higher quality. Which would you say would be the best to get the most out of my camera and also if my budget stretches to both lenses is it worth getting both of them or are they just covering the same ground and thus not worth it?
Would love your thoughts on this.
Thanks alot!
The lens you mention is not the lens he talks about. He speaks of a constant f4 L lens (mark I or Mark II is still the same design). The lens you speak of may have a bettet motor for video but is probably a lower quality lens overall and does not have a constent aperture. But for video, that Sigma 18-35mm 1.8 is great.
thinking of getting the mark 1 version to complement my 5d mk 2, gonna reunite them lol
super good thanks
Thank you!
Now? Now!!! Got it
I great video but I have a question for you if I have the Canon 24 to 105 and it's strictly an F4 aperture does that mean that no matter where I set my camera the aperture on the lens doesn't change therefore there's no use in shooting in aperture priority mode with this lens correct
Nice video and very informative! I just buy my first DSLR camera Canon EOS 800D ! This lens is to expensive for me right now! The kit lens is a 18-55mm ! What cheap all around lens should I buy? Thanks!
Try the nifty-fifty 50mm f1.8
Is it good for me if i buy canon 28mm or 35mm fixed lence for wide angle photos??
because its cheaper in cost from the price of 24-105mm....
great vid! question, is this lens parfocal?
No) Its photo lens)
For parfocal look for cine zooms (laowa, dzo, fujinon) or cheap alternative - tokina 28-70 angieniux design.
Have you tried the Canon 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 STM? I'm curious which one I'd like better for video.
STM is silent . USM is noisier . Get the STM for video's
What’s a good low light action lens particularly for gymnastics shots/video? Do you think this lens will do the trick? Thanks
If its low light try the 24-70 2.8 or a 50mm 1.4 or 1.8 they would be nice
What happened to the subtitles after @01:04 ?
Thinking about this lens for static car stuff/walk about. I have 10-20mm sigma and a 18-50mm sigma f2.8 with a 70-200m canon L. Hoping 24mm is wide enough on a crop sensor
Beave not sure man, I also have a Crop, though I’m considering Full Frame. I feel like 24 might be a bit tight in some cases! But if you’re keeping the 10-20, then it could be very nice!
It would definitely be just a bit tight in some cases (about 38mm), but not awful.
I’ve been shooting only with primes and with no IS, this will be my first IS L lens.
Mine is coming in the mail in a few hours and I can't wait , I bought the mark 2 version , switching from prime only aswell
Layth Abdulwahab That’s the one I got, you’re gonna love it.
so... tamron 28-75 2.8 or canon 24-105mm f4 for weddings etc?
Its funny. I’ve had this lens for 15 years. Came with the 5d mk II. It’s razor sharp and bores me. Its really great at rendering what I see but never transforms the scene into something other. So I rarely use it. I tend to go for a prime that can pop or move my feet so I can use a closer zoom. It’s just never been my ride.
Could anyone tell me whether the eos 1D mark I and Mark II have the same battery, thank you.
Is this strong for vlogging?
I'm contemplating between the Canon 24-105 f4 and the 24-70 f4. Which one should I get. I really can't decide.
24-105 F4, go for it
I used this lens for many years on a crop and I love it. But now I bought a 35 prime 1.4 and didn't use the 24-105 anymore. Prime charged the way I take pictures now.
How do you like the 35mm? Canon or Sigma?
@@KellanReck I like the 35 very much. It's a Canon and it changed the way I photograph in a positive manner.
Super video! I applauded for $5.00 👏👏
Wow, thanks so much!
is it good for group photos
I love that
i just want to buy 1 lens that's going to make my pictures awesome i want a lens that take great pictures in low light help me pick a great lens that i can also take group photos with
thank
IS noise and the zoom creep is an issue for me
Can you shoot selfie videos with this lens? I am considering to buy 17-40mm because I cannot use the 50mm for selfies
You could, but you'd probably want to go a bit wider. 17-40mm would be better for selfies.
Hello.can you recommend this for wedding photography (outdoor)
Yes, it's a great choice!
Does anyone know if this works with the Viltrox EF-EOS M2 mount?
Yes it will work
POV: your watching this cause you just got one even tho its old its still amazing and you fell in love with it
Hi. Betwen 24-105 II / 24-70 2.8 I, which one would you prefer?
Depends if you want the ability to zoom in a bit more, or if you prefer the lens that can open up to f/2.8.
@@KellanReck 2.8 is a deal breaker, but i´m concern about image quallity of de 24-70 I (used) vs 24-205 II (brand new one), can´t decide yet. thanks for the answer
Can't argue about the versatility of this lens, but from the image quality standpoint, IMHO, this lens shouldn't be in L category. I have this lens, the chromatic aberration in this lens is high, and as you show it in your video, the IQ on the edge is really not good. I think, IMO, instead of buying this lens, I'd prefer to buy the Tamron 24-70 F2.8 G2 instead. Yes, you can't get the 104mm, but for most portrait photos the 70mm can handle it quite right. However, the RF 24-105mm F4 L, is a superb lens.
Do you have the first or second version? I'm thinking about getting the mk ii, but if you aren't satisfied with it, i might just get another.
@@jakob2049 I have the first one version. Here is the comparison between both version: czcams.com/video/p3w_1xM_QPA/video.html .
But I prefer 24-70 f2.8. 105mm is not really very zoomed in compare to 70mm. But you lose 1 stop of apeature. If it is a 24-120 f4 I think make it more useful.
Todoay i buy my 24-105 (first version) lens! I'm verry happy!!!
Yay! Have fun
@@KellanReck Thank you so much!
i want to get the new mark2 but the new world has brought the price to $1300. wish i got it then. still might get it on open box for $1150.
I bought one last night.
Which lens is good in sharpness.
Most lenses these days are sharp but if I had to choose one I would say my 100mm macro is very sharp so is my 70 200 2.8
Would this work with the t5 camera?
It should..,I can't see why not
Can I use this lens on my Canon t3?
Yes
MK 1 has a lens creep problem
The sigma 24 to 105 ratings better than Canon, much sharper
W.O.W.
The best Canon 24-105 is Sigma Art 24-105 ;)
I think you’re right!
Could i use this lens on a T6?
Fixed up Films yes but since it’s a cropped sensor it’ll be closer and different from full
Yes you can use it. Fits right in.
Auto focus?
Aperture is 1.6x crop as well...
Not good on cropped sensor because of F4 aperture. Canon cropped sensor ISO performance is not that good even nowadays.
That fringing though
Wait isn’t he the golden retriever human from Tiktok?? 😍
Can you use this lens on a Canon t6?
Jaire Zaleta it should fit. I have it on my T7i which is pretty much the same
The only reason I am not going to buy this is cost !!
About the low light, it depends on which Camera you are using…