I'm surprised that the Bleriot could fly that slow. Wing warping aircraft are hard to fly on a windy day as the control is so subtle. You can really see the wing flexing around either intentionally or not. It was flying well but was under powered and the pilot got into a box of wanting altitude and not enough power to get there. The early aircraft types crashed so slowly that survival was quite high as long as the mistake was made close to the ground. All the pioneer aircraft were really tail heavy so a constant forward push on the elevator was needed at all times so the mushing behavior of this Bleriot was just flying with neutral trim. Wanting altitude and pushing down is confusing so this crash happened a lot back then.
We don't fly these about the high tree lines in the US, they are not really controllable in wind gusts. That is some crazy aggressive flying. He was lucky to survive.
Indeed a shame, To me it looked under powered from the start, I know they aren't supposed to be powerful but I have seen other examples flying. Flying low down wind caused a stall when he tried to climb. At least the pilot escaped, the plane can be rebuilt.
The equivalent and stability of flying a box kite with an underpowered engine. Way too windy, way too tight of turns for conditions. On a calm day you could throttle off a bit to settle her down to land. On a windy day you'd need a lot of throttle and control to fly it to the ground or it's going to stall and flop just like it did. Crashing one is an expensive way to learn the plane's primitive characteristics. Glad he walked away. He's now part of an exclusive club of perhaps 3 pilots that crashed a Bleriot .......that are even still alive today over 100 years later.
Je sais que c'est un 7 cylindres. L'original c'était un 3 cylindres. Je ne connais pas la marque mais je sais qu'il était amplement motorisé. Si je réussi à avoir plus d'informations, je viendrai les rajouter.
I hope the pilot has no lasting injuries from this crash. Any crash you can walkaway from, I guess. That little plane folded like a piece of paper. Just remember the old saying. "There are old pilots and there are bold pilots, but there are no old bold pilots."
Le moteur est de rotec en australie si je me souvien bien the engine is from australia , Rotec if I remember correctly , 130hp (i think) I know the owner and the builder
@@Holliethedog makes some differnce to..down wind if you close to stall speed on the more windy the day . gusty . could make diffrence to this early plane flying close to stall speed
You are mistaken. An aircraft does not know if it is going upwind or downwind, only a ground observer can judge that. It flies in the air. Going too slow, however, can obviously cause a stall, that is a different matter. The "up-wind down-wind" argument is a cause of amusement to full-size and model aircraft flyers. Non-flyers find it hard to understand. To try to understand, imagine you are in a plane flying 100kph to the North- a wind from the North starts blowing head-on at 100kph.Your plane does not suddenly drop from the sky, you are still subject to the laws of aerodynamics , air is still flowing over your plane. You just stop making headway. You are still flying, just going no-where.
The pilot made many mistakes during that flight! Turning sharply reduced the speed on the inner wing and it showed the effect and consequences of that a number of times. The pilot should have felt the situation, by the seat of his pants, before it happened. He induced it all himself. Pity really. He should have known and put that nose down immediately, even if he had to land prior than he intended. Glad that he was not hurt apart for his self-esteem! All those many hours of dedicated construction ruined, due to lack of attention!
I have the same conclusion. What really did him in is the wind though.. but he should’ve known better, the only reason why he didn’t crash when the wing tip dipped down to the ground really close to the ground is that he was flying into the wind and that saved him as airspeed almost always will. Yep, he did it to himself.
L'aeroplano è una macchina equilibrata ma con poca potenza e vicino al suolo avrei volato in volo rettilineo. Il tentativo di salire dopo la virata ha mandato la semiala destra in stallo. Per fortuna è andato tutto bene.
L’avantage de ce genre d’avion c’est qu’en cas de crash ben on se fait pas trop mal. Mon père c’était écrasé avec un bébé jodel c’était pas la même histoire
On dirait que le moteur a perdu la puissance. Perte de l'altitude, une tentative de virage à droit à basse vitesse et boum... Content que le pilot s'en est sorti ...
Moteur ? Ah bon ... ne serait ce pas plutôt l'effet doppler ? Nez haut (second régime), vent arrière, avec du vent(trop pour une trapanelle) et des rafales (en plus) ... bref, tous les ingrédients sont là pour un décrochage sur l'aile... Je ne crois pas que le moteur y soit pour quelque chose.
Dam ! I hope the guy alright . What it sound like the engine was loosing power and the pore guy didn't make it and the plane stalled . Indicated by the right wing stall .
@@t34bmentor Merci et vous savez qui le pilotait ? Je sais qu'il y a un nommé Legault qui a construit déjà d'autre avions de l'époque de la première guerre mondiale.
avec une puissance pareil au niveau du moteur;l 'homme aurait volé 100 ans avant! Le bleriot tournait comme nos voiture actuelles ...au ralenti!!! je rigole ;mais ilo devait tourner maxi a 2000tour par minute
n'importe quoi: un moteur d'avion avec hélice en prise directe ça tourne généralement entre 2000 et 2600tr/min que ce soit pour un Blériot comme pour un avion d'aéroclub moderne...
@@protalukoriginal4560 Horrible, ça m’est arrivé plusieurs fois en modélisme Tu passe 2 voire 3 ans à construire un avion en bois depuis un plan et au premier vol tu le pulvérise, c’est terrible
It's a good thing that the construction obviously absorbed a lot of energy on impact. It's nice to see that the pilot remained (relatively) unharmed.
That’s a very realistic replica. Even the landing looked authentic.
That bird really should not have been flying in that much wind. Tried to do too much with a floater....especially downwind. Very lucky.
I'm surprised that the Bleriot could fly that slow. Wing warping aircraft are hard to fly on a windy day as the control is so subtle. You can really see the wing flexing around either intentionally or not. It was flying well but was under powered and the pilot got into a box of wanting altitude and not enough power to get there. The early aircraft types crashed so slowly that survival was quite high as long as the mistake was made close to the ground. All the pioneer aircraft were really tail heavy so a constant forward push on the elevator was needed at all times so the mushing behavior of this Bleriot was just flying with neutral trim. Wanting altitude and pushing down is confusing so this crash happened a lot back then.
Classic stall, glad he is ok.
We don't fly these about the high tree lines in the US, they are not really controllable in wind gusts. That is some crazy aggressive flying. He was lucky to survive.
what a shame, such a beautiful project.
I feel so happy his alive so sad when the lady crying I think that day is nightmare for her still now sorry for my English
Indeed a shame, To me it looked under powered from the start, I know they aren't supposed to be powerful but I have seen other examples flying.
Flying low down wind caused a stall when he tried to climb. At least the pilot escaped, the plane can be rebuilt.
The equivalent and stability of flying a box kite with an underpowered engine. Way too windy, way too tight of turns for conditions. On a calm day you could throttle off a bit to settle her down to land. On a windy day you'd need a lot of throttle and control to fly it to the ground or it's going to stall and flop just like it did. Crashing one is an expensive way to learn the plane's primitive characteristics. Glad he walked away. He's now part of an exclusive club of perhaps 3 pilots that crashed a Bleriot .......that are even still alive today over 100 years later.
If the pond is choppy the landing will be sloppy in the pre war ultralights , hope he's ok
Je sais que c'est un 7 cylindres. L'original c'était un 3 cylindres. Je ne connais pas la marque mais je sais qu'il était amplement motorisé. Si je réussi à avoir plus d'informations, je viendrai les rajouter.
Le vol d'inauguration a ete filmé,c'est l essentiel !!!
He was going too slow :(
Oh! Lástima, espero que el piloto esté bien
Don't attempt to land downwind !
Une bête perte de vitesse ou décrochage en terme moderne. Avion qui volait déjà queue basse durant le vol. Centrage correct ?
I hope the pilot has no lasting injuries from this crash. Any crash you can walkaway from, I guess.
That little plane folded like a piece of paper.
Just remember the old saying. "There are old pilots and there are bold pilots, but there are no old bold pilots."
Too low. Too slow and with the wind.🤔😥😥
tout-à fait !
Il a l'air vraiment mal centré depuis le début du vol et revenir si bas par vent arrière n'est pas très malin
that looked like a really rough crash
Very kool
Holy Shit!!!!!!.....
Le moteur est de rotec en australie si je me souvien bien
the engine is from australia , Rotec if I remember correctly , 130hp (i think)
I know the owner and the builder
It is in Quebec because the accent is very powerful and very recognizable .... ^^
Quel accent ? Lol!!!!
@@louispatry7719 Ecoute les spectateurs parler....😉
How sad. Looked as though the airspeed was too low and, going downwind the airspeed was negligable causing the stall. A power problem?
What I knew was that the pilot was apparently very nervous and it seems that he did not have much experience either
Upwind, downwind, makes no difference, you are confusing groundspeed with airspeed.
@@Holliethedog makes some differnce to..down wind if you close to stall speed on the more windy the day . gusty . could make diffrence to this early plane flying close to stall speed
You are mistaken. An aircraft does not know if it is going upwind or downwind, only a ground observer can judge that. It flies in the air. Going too slow, however, can obviously cause a stall, that is a different matter. The "up-wind down-wind" argument is a cause of amusement to full-size and model aircraft flyers. Non-flyers find it hard to understand. To try to understand, imagine you are in a plane flying 100kph to the North- a wind from the North starts blowing head-on at 100kph.Your plane does not suddenly drop from the sky, you are still subject to the laws of aerodynamics , air is still flowing over your plane. You just stop making headway. You are still flying, just going no-where.
@@jimmywright5054 Idiot! I have explained it to you.
Ce que j'ai su c'est que je pilote était apparemment très nerveux et il me semble qu'il n'avait pas beaucoup d'expérience non plus.
What I knew was that the pilot was apparently very nervous and it seems that he did not have much experience either
The pilot made many mistakes during that flight! Turning sharply reduced the speed on the inner wing and it showed the effect and consequences of that a number of times. The pilot should have felt the situation, by the seat of his pants, before it happened. He induced it all himself. Pity really. He should have known and put that nose down immediately, even if he had to land prior than he intended. Glad that he was not hurt apart for his self-esteem! All those many hours of dedicated construction ruined, due to lack of attention!
I have the same conclusion. What really did him in is the wind though.. but he should’ve known better, the only reason why he didn’t crash when the wing tip dipped down to the ground really close to the ground is that he was flying into the wind and that saved him as airspeed almost always will. Yep, he did it to himself.
He seemed to have landed downwind according to the movement of the grass.
Like Bleriot, Who broke many wood before flying secure...
Downwind turn demon got him
tip: dont let off the gas and go up at the same time.
Mais que faisait il si bas par vent arrière ? Erreur de débutant !
Probůh, co v tom je za endžín?
aterrizo con viento de cola. por eso se cayo.
L'aeroplano è una macchina equilibrata ma con poca potenza e vicino al suolo avrei volato in volo rettilineo. Il tentativo di salire dopo la virata ha mandato la semiala destra in stallo. Per fortuna è andato tutto bene.
Looks like he was flying downwind
L’avantage de ce genre d’avion c’est qu’en cas de crash ben on se fait pas trop mal. Mon père c’était écrasé avec un bébé jodel c’était pas la même histoire
On dirait que le moteur a perdu la puissance. Perte de l'altitude, une tentative de virage à droit à basse vitesse et boum... Content que le pilot s'en est sorti ...
Moteur ? Ah bon ... ne serait ce pas plutôt l'effet doppler ?
Nez haut (second régime), vent arrière, avec du vent(trop pour une trapanelle) et des rafales (en plus) ... bref, tous les ingrédients sont là pour un décrochage sur l'aile...
Je ne crois pas que le moteur y soit pour quelque chose.
@@ponceteric5457 Tout à fait ! Cela dit, quelques heures d'écolage en aéroclub seraient les bien-venues pour le pilote.
Avec un vent parreil, on ne vole pas en Blériot.
il y avait apparemment beaucoup de vent ce jour-la...
Definitely pilot error to slow on turns lost all flying speed.
Dam ! I hope the guy alright . What it sound like the engine was loosing power and the pore guy didn't make it and the plane stalled . Indicated by the right wing stall .
Où est-ce arrivé ? L'accent est québécois.
Un petit aéroport dans le coin de St-Hyacinthe
@@t34bmentor Merci et vous savez qui le pilotait ? Je sais qu'il y a un nommé Legault qui a construit déjà d'autre avions de l'époque de la première guerre mondiale.
@@vincentlefebvre9255 Non mais il me semble que le pilote n’est pas le constructeur.
Les conditions n'avaient pas l'air si bonne
avec une puissance pareil au niveau du moteur;l 'homme aurait volé 100 ans avant!
Le bleriot tournait comme nos voiture actuelles ...au ralenti!!!
je rigole ;mais ilo devait tourner maxi a 2000tour par minute
n'importe quoi: un moteur d'avion avec hélice en prise directe ça tourne généralement entre 2000 et 2600tr/min que ce soit pour un Blériot comme pour un avion d'aéroclub moderne...
Quax, le pilote du casse.
stalled
Mdr comment le mec est sorti comme si de rien en mode "même pas mal" alors que l'avion s'est écrabouillé sur sa tête
down wind stall, not a good place to be in
Pourquoi la femme continue de pleuré alors que le pilote et sortit indemne
Des années de construction perdu
@@gaeltissot8179 2 ou plus années perdues en 15 secondes
@@protalukoriginal4560 Horrible, ça m’est arrivé plusieurs fois en modélisme
Tu passe 2 voire 3 ans à construire un avion en bois depuis un plan et au premier vol tu le pulvérise, c’est terrible
elle touchera pas d'assurance-vie.
wie kann man nur mit solch einem langsamen Flugzeug einen Landeanflug mit starkem Rückenwind machen? Unfassbar dumm!