I really hope we keep hold of Nico Jackson! Yes, he has had some awful misses here and there. However ending up with 14 non penalty PL goals his first season ain't bad. He seems likes he generally likes it at Chelsea and wants to do well and tries his best. He has got great potential, if only he can improve a bit on his finishing on those clear cut chances i think we got a great striker on our hands. Not to mention he can work well on the wing as well. At the least if he keeps at this level and don't improve he is still a good squad option.
We’ve all seen how Jackson has improved, stays uninjured and has had better first season figures than Drogba. Drogba he ain’t but he is a valuable asset we should be keeping.
Id rather keep the squad we have, the board being open to sell players on the verge of a break out season is worrying. Jackson NKunku Palmer Carney Enzo Caicedo Gusto James Tosin Fofana New GK Madueke Lavia Mudryk Colwill Chalobah Cucurella Petrovic Santos Kellyman Guiu
If Sancho is willing to go down in wages and he is serious and plays like he was playing in the CL for Dortmund and he cuts out playing Fifa until 7 Am then hell yeah we need him at Chelsea. Im a big fan of Olise but even i will admit that Sancho at his best is even better than Olise
@@samleyin7243 bro let Olive play a few seasons until you smother him in liquid gold. If Sancho was taking himself seriously, he would be Hazard level by now...Just don't bring him at Chelsea, cause he sounds like bad news....
Honestly I'd rather Chelsea keep the squad as is. If signing KDH or Isak means losing Jackson or Chukwuemeka. Especially when Sterling & Mudryk are probably staying, which is frustrating in it self.
I would take Sancho immediately. With Ten Hag still at United I can't imagine him being too expensive and as he likely wants to leave that place himself I can really see him agree to our wage demands. If they are asking for less than 40mil then we should just agree to the deal and take the risk. There is still a serious player in there that could make that sum of money look cheap. Jackson to Newcastle on the other hand would be a mistake. We can only loose in that transfer. Also there has been way too much talk about Jackson being the clear No.1 at Chelsea.
How do build a long term team spirit if you constantly buy and sell players. At some point the players will just take their wages, and not give the commitment.
Others are trying to destabilize Jackson and harm Chelsea. He’s valued by the club, which is CFC went out and grab an unknown to be the main striker for a top club. CFC turned him into a world recognized player and the club feels that Enzo M can make him more prolific.
Your videos are the highlight of my day Yan...i listen to them while at the office, even my colleagues know your voice😂, once you start talking they all ask what's up with chels? Who did y'all sign...its beautiful mahn, keep it up
Getting rid of Jackson really says it all about these clueless owners…Jackson is a young DEVELOPING player with a good return….Getting fed up with this rollercoaster just leave the team settle
The Problem is the buy to much so must sell great sell made players like Maatsen, Callagher and James. Not against them they but i would ask i its was need to buy both Caceido and Lavia? Also wonder if its is good buy every wonderkid?
@@joshmoore0914 They Problem is that Chelsea must sell Player if they get a good offer they will sell. Also Gallagher is very important will be sold because they they to not break the rules. And that comes all from Boehley to much buy strategie under Roman and the Iron Lady the buy with brain! For me its hurts that sell Maasten if would be very good as LWB for us.
@@patrickfabsich2692 Right, because Lukaku for almost 100 mil after selling him years ealier, only to have him completely flop was a real "brain" purchase. People completely forget that Roman had a tendancy to throw a lot of money at players that flopped. He also sold players that went on to be world-class. I personally dont understand why our fans develop emotional attatchements to players like Maatsen who never played for us instead of being glad we made a massive profit off of him.
Jackson is the most valuable African player in Europe currently, and if he was playing elsewhere and we were linked to him this fan base would be celebrating
I really like Nico. I don't want him going anywhere. I seriously think he could be one of the best attacking players in the league some day. At the very least I wouldn't want to see him playing against us in the Prem.
40mil for Archy? Heck Kellyman looks like a barging for the 19mil we are going to pay Villa.🤣 Its crazy how clubs chasing talents in the hopes to find the next "big thing". In terms of a striker i agree. We "need" someone on Jacksons level. They should push each other. A little different in profil. More like a typical "box striker". So we have different options. But Jackson had some realy good development during last season. He was told to stop acting stupid and getting booked every game. He did it. His hold and link up game got much better. He started to score even headers. His converation rates needs to improve. But thats more related to experience and coaching. I do believe Nico will be a +20 goals in a league season attacker within 2yrs. 30 goals in all comps wouldnt surprise me TBH. I truely believe that Cole Palmer, Paéz and Nico will be deemed as the best signings in the last 10 to 20yrs for Chelsea. Im not so sure about Estevao. Usualy those fragile brazilians are one or two injuries away from desaster. Like what happend to Neymar.😞
No way should we sell Jackson, he has improved dramatically since the start of last season and I watched all Chelsea’s goals from last season yesterday and Jackson, Palmer, Madueke and even Mudryk and Sterling were scoring the vast majority of our goals
Don't know if Maresca was at City when Sancho threw his toys out the pram because Pep didn't want to play him and move on. His personality isn't great and his wages will be too much so a big for for me
Jackson can be upset about a manager leaving but he needs to grow up and understand he is operating in a business and will see many more changes throughout his career. Focus on scoring goals and earning incentive bonuses.
Loyalty is not a bad trait, fans get angry at players when they show no loyalty to the team and make business moves in their interest. That sword is double edged.
I'm becoming concerned with the policy at the club. Initially I thought this is great, we're getting out there and getting the next Caicedo's and Enzo's for 15m. Paez and Estavo look great, but do you really see them both playing in the team at the same time. I look at Kellyman and think that's Carney gone and then and in 2 years time it'll be Kellyman that will be moved on as another 18 year old is signed. There's no way we have any intention of putting them all in the squad. This model will carry on every year as yopu can't say that's it, we've got all the wonderkids we want as who knows what's coming through in 2 years time. I thought we'd make 3 or 4 signings, but this is going to be far more than that. There is a coldness to this that I don't like. I can't see academy players being taken at 15 and 16 as they will see there is no pathway. I suppose we have previous in this regard as Roman used the academy to make money.
I think it's time Chelsea start promoting players from the academy and stop all these unnecessary South American signings we have gems like Rio Ngumoha,Yahya,Harvey Vale etc, and because of these we lost Tudor Mendel-Idowu who has better skills and quality than most of these South American talents, I think if we lose Rio Ngumoha who has been targeted by Bayern Munich, it'll be worse than when we lost Musiala. Todd Boehly is killing Cobham Academy with unnecessary signings, that's the sad truth 😢
If the academy player stands out, they will get a chance to make it at Chelsea for now the owners are committed to the project and want to make Chelsea challenging for the top awards. Despite the inpatient and constantly whining fans. I'm positive we will soon fly high again.
@@kevinrotsaert6292 but these signings are unnecessary, we have gems in the academy we can promote, if they observe the fact that we are signing too much players our academy won't be attractive anymore and they all leave.
Don't just buy young players who can't use them now and don't necessarily think they'll be good when they get older. Also fix senior fans who long for Chelsea to lift the title.
YES to Sancho 💯 The kid was a scapegoat like Ronaldo from ETH... You can't leave a team with a " bad " performance in general then go to your previous team who plays in UCL and you play well... SORRY but reality can't be violated. There s no miracles in football guys. Stop being romantic.
When Jackson's missing wide open nets again next season, and we slide down the standings, I'm going to quote you on this. There's negativity, positivity, but there's also realism. I wish you'd be more drawn towards realism mate - We keep downgrading everything, and you seem to keep on celebrating. (Tuchel > Poch > Lampard = Maresca > Potter), (Silva > Chalobah > Tosin), (Osimhen > Alverez > Isak > Jackson > Duran > 18 yo kids), (Gallagher > Chukwuemeka > Dewsbury-Hall) - you seeing a pattern here, Jan?
Sancho? No thanks. And selling Nico Jackson? For Isak? No thanks, again. The degree of squad turnover is a primary reason why it's so hard to achieve any sort of chemistry and cohesion. The owners need to stop f*cking about and realise that this isn't Football Manager. Our scouting is good? We paid 105m for Enzo, 115m for Caicedo and 62m++ for Mudryk. Oh, yeah, scouting geniuses for sure!
I really hope we keep hold of Nico Jackson! Yes, he has had some awful misses here and there. However ending up with 14 non penalty PL goals his first season ain't bad. He seems likes he generally likes it at Chelsea and wants to do well and tries his best. He has got great potential, if only he can improve a bit on his finishing on those clear cut chances i think we got a great striker on our hands. Not to mention he can work well on the wing as well. At the least if he keeps at this level and don't improve he is still a good squad option.
💯 agree
Exactly that my friend
cant score important goals and they win games
I swear the Sancho rumour comes around every year. Neeext
We’ve all seen how Jackson has improved, stays uninjured and has had better first season figures than Drogba. Drogba he ain’t but he is a valuable asset we should be keeping.
Of course not all academy players make it, but you can’t be appearing to block their progression path.
@@pault3452Jackson is an academy player?
He even played in AFCON
Jackson will be world class soon
😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@drunkinclam100 What's so funny?
@@drunkinclam100 learn ball.
Sancho for £40m? No chance, more like £25m max.
Even 25 mil for Sancho is too much.
@@skyshooter4009probably a fair point!
@@skyshooter4009 Too much. Is he going to do better than what Palmer and Madueke are already doing for us.
Id rather keep the squad we have, the board being open to sell players on the verge of a break out season is worrying.
Jackson
NKunku Palmer
Carney Enzo
Caicedo
Gusto James
Tosin Fofana
New GK
Madueke
Lavia
Mudryk
Colwill
Chalobah
Cucurella
Petrovic
Santos
Kellyman
Guiu
Chilwil, cucu, disasi, and Sanchez, and badiasheil, loading dawsburry-hall, and striker, winger 😂😂
Even anew Left back loading as well 😂😂
only change will be Lavia for Carney, don't know about Gusto on the left but Cucurella is there if he can't perform.
Why sell an improved striker that doesn't get injured??
If Sancho is willing to go down in wages and he is serious and plays like he was playing in the CL for Dortmund and he cuts out playing Fifa until 7 Am then hell yeah we need him at Chelsea. Im a big fan of Olise but even i will admit that Sancho at his best is even better than Olise
He is good but not better than olise
👍👍💯💯 a bravo
@@samleyin7243 bro let Olive play a few seasons until you smother him in liquid gold. If Sancho was taking himself seriously, he would be Hazard level by now...Just don't bring him at Chelsea, cause he sounds like bad news....
Olise is so clear. But if Sancho fees and wages aren’t too much I think it’s worth the risk
Honestly I'd rather Chelsea keep the squad as is. If signing KDH or Isak means losing Jackson or Chukwuemeka. Especially when Sterling & Mudryk are probably staying, which is frustrating in it self.
Sterling can go anywhere, that's why Chelsea wants KDH
what a day wake up from sleep and seeing dat you have uploaded a video keep it up man
I would take Sancho immediately.
With Ten Hag still at United I can't imagine him being too expensive and as he likely wants to leave that place himself I can really see him agree to our wage demands.
If they are asking for less than 40mil then we should just agree to the deal and take the risk. There is still a serious player in there that could make that sum of money look cheap.
Jackson to Newcastle on the other hand would be a mistake. We can only loose in that transfer. Also there has been way too much talk about Jackson being the clear No.1 at Chelsea.
I d take Sancho 💯💯💯
I d gladly take the risk and take him. He s still young and he ll be good if he s serious.
How do build a long term team spirit if you constantly buy and sell players. At some point the players will just take their wages, and not give the commitment.
Nico had a great first year. Had he taken our penalties he would’ve been close to the golden boot 😂
Sanco Is a massive Chelsea fan. I wouldn't mind this.
Nah his wage is not worth it
@@TChAriv1so you think he won't cut them 😂😂 otherwise he s returning to MU....no way he wants to stay there. Let s use our mind 1st.
@@TChAriv1 hopefully negotiate it down.
He’s never going to be on Man U money where ever he go’s.
Others are trying to destabilize Jackson and harm Chelsea. He’s valued by the club, which is CFC went out and grab an unknown to be the main striker for a top club. CFC turned him into a world recognized player and the club feels that Enzo M can make him more prolific.
Romano said cfc are not getting rid of Jackson, what's this nonsense.
Your videos are the highlight of my day Yan...i listen to them while at the office, even my colleagues know your voice😂, once you start talking they all ask what's up with chels? Who did y'all sign...its beautiful mahn, keep it up
Same here 😂
Getting rid of Jackson really says it all about these clueless owners…Jackson is a young DEVELOPING player with a good return….Getting fed up with this rollercoaster just leave the team settle
These “clueless owners “ bought the kid. So who is really clueless?
The Problem is the buy to much so must sell great sell made players like Maatsen, Callagher and James.
Not against them they but i would ask i its was need to buy both Caceido and Lavia?
Also wonder if its is good buy every wonderkid?
What part of "Nico Jackson is a really important payer for Chelsea who they believe will do very well under Enzo Maresca" did you miss here?
@@joshmoore0914 They Problem is that Chelsea must sell Player if they get a good offer they will sell. Also Gallagher is very important will be sold because they they to not break the rules. And that comes all from Boehley to much buy strategie under Roman and the Iron Lady the buy with brain!
For me its hurts that sell Maasten if would be very good as LWB for us.
@@patrickfabsich2692 Right, because Lukaku for almost 100 mil after selling him years ealier, only to have him completely flop was a real "brain" purchase. People completely forget that Roman had a tendancy to throw a lot of money at players that flopped. He also sold players that went on to be world-class. I personally dont understand why our fans develop emotional attatchements to players like Maatsen who never played for us instead of being glad we made a massive profit off of him.
Nico Jackson is very happy at Chelsea
I'm here for Yan calling me 'baby' daily
Great to be here
Good to see a Nigerian brother here
I wouldn't mind Sancho!
Did you watch him at united?
I watched casemiro and varane at united too@@KTBFFH_CFC
We must not lose Nico Jackson
Chelsea don't need high spending players, they are not a success in Chelsea history
If Chelsea let go of Jackson. It will annoy me. Like that guy's future is bright.
I would be really pissed.
Jackson is the most valuable African player in Europe currently, and if he was playing elsewhere and we were linked to him this fan base would be celebrating
I really like Nico. I don't want him going anywhere. I seriously think he could be one of the best attacking players in the league some day. At the very least I wouldn't want to see him playing against us in the Prem.
IF He played against us that would be really annoying.
40mil for Archy? Heck Kellyman looks like a barging for the 19mil we are going to pay Villa.🤣 Its crazy how clubs chasing talents in the hopes to find the next "big thing". In terms of a striker i agree. We "need" someone on Jacksons level. They should push each other. A little different in profil. More like a typical "box striker". So we have different options. But Jackson had some realy good development during last season. He was told to stop acting stupid and getting booked every game. He did it. His hold and link up game got much better. He started to score even headers. His converation rates needs to improve. But thats more related to experience and coaching. I do believe Nico will be a +20 goals in a league season attacker within 2yrs. 30 goals in all comps wouldnt surprise me TBH. I truely believe that Cole Palmer, Paéz and Nico will be deemed as the best signings in the last 10 to 20yrs for Chelsea. Im not so sure about Estevao. Usualy those fragile brazilians are one or two injuries away from desaster. Like what happend to Neymar.😞
MATHS!
Niko is our no1 and i don't mind that one bit
Surely in most cases, if a player is offered, it's a red flag eg.
We've offered Lukaku to every club going.
No one wants Sancho even on a free. Unless, Man U does us a solid one and buy 3 of our dead woods.
No way should we sell Jackson, he has improved dramatically since the start of last season and I watched all Chelsea’s goals from last season yesterday and Jackson, Palmer, Madueke and even Mudryk and Sterling were scoring the vast majority of our goals
I saw u pushing a pram down Wandsworth Bridge road with a bint
Don't know if Maresca was at City when Sancho threw his toys out the pram because Pep didn't want to play him and move on. His personality isn't great and his wages will be too much so a big for for me
Sancho would be cool. Definitely keep Jackson
Chelsea need low key players and talent ones too
Jackson can be upset about a manager leaving but he needs to grow up and understand he is operating in a business and will see many more changes throughout his career. Focus on scoring goals and earning incentive bonuses.
Loyalty is not a bad trait, fans get angry at players when they show no loyalty to the team and make business moves in their interest. That sword is double edged.
I'm becoming concerned with the policy at the club. Initially I thought this is great, we're getting out there and getting the next Caicedo's and Enzo's for 15m. Paez and Estavo look great, but do you really see them both playing in the team at the same time. I look at Kellyman and think that's Carney gone and then and in 2 years time it'll be Kellyman that will be moved on as another 18 year old is signed. There's no way we have any intention of putting them all in the squad. This model will carry on every year as yopu can't say that's it, we've got all the wonderkids we want as who knows what's coming through in 2 years time. I thought we'd make 3 or 4 signings, but this is going to be far more than that. There is a coldness to this that I don't like. I can't see academy players being taken at 15 and 16 as they will see there is no pathway. I suppose we have previous in this regard as Roman used the academy to make money.
Being offered to Chelsea....along with every other club with a big enough bag 💙💙💙
High on Jackson to!
Is there an unofficial term when the profit is not “pure”? Dirty profit? Unclean profit? Impure profit?
I think it's time Chelsea start promoting players from the academy and stop all these unnecessary South American signings we have gems like Rio Ngumoha,Yahya,Harvey Vale etc, and because of these we lost Tudor Mendel-Idowu who has better skills and quality than most of these South American talents, I think if we lose Rio Ngumoha who has been targeted by Bayern Munich, it'll be worse than when we lost Musiala. Todd Boehly is killing Cobham Academy with unnecessary signings, that's the sad truth 😢
Amen to that. Our academy needs to be a route to first team football.
It's not just Todd, there's a whole team incl. directors and Begdahli
If the academy player stands out, they will get a chance to make it at Chelsea for now the owners are committed to the project and want to make Chelsea challenging for the top awards.
Despite the inpatient and constantly whining fans.
I'm positive we will soon fly high again.
We still use some academy players in the first squad ... You can't make them all play, they're NOT all good enough to make it.
@@kevinrotsaert6292 but these signings are unnecessary, we have gems in the academy we can promote, if they observe the fact that we are signing too much players our academy won't be attractive anymore and they all leave.
Fabrizio R confirmed Jackson is not going anywhere.
Just looked at the byline, wtf on Jackson
Don't just buy young players who can't use them now and don't necessarily think they'll be good when they get older. Also fix senior fans who long for Chelsea to lift the title.
Jackson for isak I'm for that
Sancho only a loan move with the option to buy makes sense,
If nico can be a bit more lethal in front of goal he will be one of the best
On this wages!!! If a player really wants the move can’t they accept lower wages?
Was wondering if we would go in for Sancho. Younger LF to take over for Raheem since the falling out at utd. Final day before #marescaball #ktbffh
Fab already squashed all of these rubbish rumours.
We have to keep Jackson
If we can get rid of sterling, I’d be interested in taking sancho on reduced wages
This team don't know what they are doing. Why sell Jackson. I'm disappointed for this news
We ABSOLUTELY do NOT need Sancho, except it's for 10million pounds and 50k per week!😂
Nothing about that title excites me 😂
I think Jackson should stay with us.
Jackson should be untouchable really I wouldn't even swap Isak or Victor for him .unpopular but still
I'm good no thanks to Sancho I would rather resign Cho and I personally don't think we should go back for Hudson Odoi
Sterling Sancho swap deal. Make this happen.
We will take Sancho only if United sells us Maguire. 😂
Stop reading too much of the daily mail mate
💙
I’d take Sancho.
Sancho . . . The thrill has gone?
I like jackson. 👍
YES to Sancho 💯 The kid was a scapegoat like Ronaldo from ETH... You can't leave a team with a " bad " performance in general then go to your previous team who plays in UCL and you play well... SORRY but reality can't be violated. There s no miracles in football guys. Stop being romantic.
Are we starting the preseason on the 1st of July????
The manager is resuming work
Can we not offer newcastle Broja plus money for Isak?
I would grab sancho with open hands and bring him home
When Jackson's missing wide open nets again next season, and we slide down the standings, I'm going to quote you on this. There's negativity, positivity, but there's also realism. I wish you'd be more drawn towards realism mate - We keep downgrading everything, and you seem to keep on celebrating. (Tuchel > Poch > Lampard = Maresca > Potter), (Silva > Chalobah > Tosin), (Osimhen > Alverez > Isak > Jackson > Duran > 18 yo kids), (Gallagher > Chukwuemeka > Dewsbury-Hall) - you seeing a pattern here, Jan?
Striker and goalkeeper.
Sancho attitude and wage is not worth it
Jackson has not been offered to anyone
Sancho? No thanks. And selling Nico Jackson? For Isak? No thanks, again. The degree of squad turnover is a primary reason why it's so hard to achieve any sort of chemistry and cohesion. The owners need to stop f*cking about and realise that this isn't Football Manager.
Our scouting is good? We paid 105m for Enzo, 115m for Caicedo and 62m++ for Mudryk. Oh, yeah, scouting geniuses for sure!
This is PR nonsense. Jackson is staying. 💙
Sancho ffs 😂😂😂😂
Where brentford get 40mil from
Lollllll, Jackson a failure misses his failed manager
I would mind Sancho but feels like he has a igo problem
Instead of isak , Jackson and omoridion is good for Chelsea
Sancho is not bad tbh
Jadon shanco chelsea must buy leon baeley
Please make a video why Chelsea let go of Musiala😮
Sounds like a job for @The Quick Take
Sancho is a big NO!!!
100 million euros?
valuation is completely off then, noone is paying 100 mill for nico now. sorry but isak is way better...
Pls no Sancho
Here's a sensible move - Loan Mudryk to Athletico, Loan Joao Felix.
1. We piss off Barcelona
2. We get a good player
3. Mudryk gets experience
Felix was awful for us. He got red carded in his first game.
@@vitruviandrums he also cant kick a ball hard, all his shots are are straight at the gk, and he doesnt pass.
@@vitruviandrumsno idea...
Not Sancho please😢 . We already have a hit or miss left winger
Once the players of the world realise they will just become the owners PROPERTY and will get bought and sold like CATTLE, they will stop coming ffs!!!
No keep Jackson
No we don’t want sancho wtf are these owners playing at we got about 10 RW
Bring SANCHO HOME! FREE US from MUDRYK I BEG
quit w the swaying back and forth mate! get your meds straight
Jackson is better than isak of Newcastle
😂😂😂 good one 😂😂😂
Nico must stay in order for Chelsea to become successful
I want him to stay but that’s not true
Chelsea shouldnt dare sancho is a system player and overhyped we dont need him
Tbh I’m saying yes to Sancho everyday of the week even on Sundays!
*maths! Yan, what's with all the Americanisms!?