Polls Show Tory Annihilation But Are They Right?
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 06. 2024
- This #generalelection2024 is unlike any previous election and it is hard to believe the Tories will be wiped out as predicted by some MRP polls says Alastair Campbell.
The farming vote is a traditional Tory vote, but many are in a dilemma about what to vote because of what #brexit has ensured for farming.
#britishfarming
#britishfood
#foodsecurity
#britain
#food
#farmersprotest
#foodie
How could any farmer vote Tory after Brexit?
Thanks Liz. In my view farming was sacrificed at the altar of Brexit. Quite deliberately. I fear Brexit is just the start
Tribalism.
@@lizwebstersbf I get that Liz but there might be hope, even the ones up here who voted Brexit are seething and after revenge on the Tories, these were the rich ones who rent out there land to others.
Let us hope that they don't vote for the Snake Oil Salesmans' candidate.
@@davidmoran7270 Amazed some are falling for him a 2nd time, hope farmers and fisherman don't, or anyone for that matter, Brexit has damaged us all, he only has hate to go on.
My MP is Keir Starmer. I knew and admired his work before he became an MP. He proved his competence and his honour in his career many times. An ex-neighbour genius lawyer who'd advised the UN on Legal and Medical matters--saw the qualifications when he helped my Chinese Partner to her visas. Masterly. He worked in Keir's Chambers for yonks and swore by Keir. He has said he'd rather under-promise then over-deliver. He succeeded in turning Labour round, built a great Front Bench & will have other MP's to choose after the Election. Yes. The Election is the thing. Never the Polls. Keir has given help to me and many others in this constituency..
How many illegals have you got living there leftoid?
Liz, my faith in you is not blind. Save British farming! ❤🎉😊
I do struggle to feel sorry for people who selfishly and greedily voted for their own demise, taking us all down with them.
Then don't vote for Tories or Reform.
If that’s directed at me I have no intention of voting Tory or Reform. I simply asked a question
1. Starmer is the glove-puppet of Tony Blair, who is, in turn, the glove-puppet of the EU and the WEF. We voted to leave the giant, duplicitous, megalomaniac scam.
2. Labour is in thrall to the Muslim block vote, which means that immigration will accelerate.
3. Labour wants to hand the vote to suitably-brainwashed schoolchildren, who think that taxpayers' money grows on trees.
How could any sane individual vote for Starmergeddon?
and why
Are the English talking about trade barriers? There are no trade barriers. These are simply rules that a third country like England must adhere to.
These rules form the trade barriers
@@martinhommel9967so the EU has these barriers for UK but trade rules for the test of the world ?
Seems a fair exchange to get our sovereignty and country back. 🤣😂🤣😂😆😁...
@@dantownsend4246 yes - because the UK government insisted we wanted them. The rules are the rules of the trade deal. Other countries may have different deals with the EU for example EFTA countries.
@@dantownsend4246 When the UK was in the EU we shared the trade rules, Leaxing was a mistake, and we have to suffer the Stupid move.
Boris Johnson claimed that the last Tory majority was an indication that the electorate wanted brexit done, when Labour wins next week with a much bigger majority that will obviously indicate that the electorate regards brexit as the failure so many of us predicted it would be & that they would now like to see it reversed or at least as much of it as possible in the shortest amount of time.
Please tell us what you know about EU fiscal union, EU economic union, EU political union, the unification of member states’ armed forces under command of the European Council, the reckless expansionism of the EU across Eastern Europe, and the unfettered migration into the EU from North Africa and the Middle East, at the EU’s open invitation. All the stuff that sixteen million Remainers voted for without realising it!
@@SJG-nr8uj I could tell you but I wouldn't wantvto spoil your fantasy.
@@user-ol6rd7pl5t So you haven't read the EU's own treaties, documents and declarations then. Why not? You voted for them! Well, now's your chance...
1. THE EU’s FEDERAL INTENTIONS (ie. to make one big country)
Lisbon Treaty Article 3.4: “The Union shall establish an ECONOMIC and monetary UNION whose currency is the euro.”
EU Five Presidents’ Report, 2015: “Progress MUST HAPPEN on four fronts: first, towards a genuine ECONOMIC UNION that ensures each economy has the structural features to prosper within the Monetary Union. Second, towards a FINANCIAL UNION that guarantees the integrity of our currency across the Monetary Union and increases risk-sharing with the private sector. This means completing the Banking Union and accelerating the Capital Markets Completing Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union. Third, towards a FISCAL UNION that delivers both fiscal sustainability and fiscal stabilisation. And finally, towards a POLITICAL UNION that provides the foundation for all of the above through genuine democratic accountability, legitimacy and institutional strengthening.”
Angela Merkel’s immediate response to the referendum result, 24th June 2016: “Today is a watershed moment for Europe, and it is a watershed moment for the EUROPEAN UNIFICATION PROCESS. There is no doubt that this is a blow to Europe, and to the EUROPEAN UNIFICATION PROCESS.”
EU Rome Declaration, 25th March 2017: “Working towards COMPLETING the ECONOMIC and monetary UNION” (with a preferred deadline for completion of 2027).
ECB’s ‘Fiscal Implications of the EU Recovery Package’ 2020. “The way that the EU has responded to the crisis also has implications for the future design and implementation of the EUROPEAN GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK. First, while expansionary fiscal policy is necessary to sustain the recovery, going forward it will be important for the fiscal rules to effectively support the reduction of high government debt in good economic times. Second, NGEU constitutes a new and innovative element of the EUROPEAN FISCAL FRAMEWORK. It will result in the issuance of sizeable supranational debt over the coming years, and its establishment has signalled a political readiness to design a common fiscal tool when the need arises. This innovation, while a one-off, could also imply lessons for ECONOMIC and Monetary UNION, which still lacks a PERMANENT FISCAL CAPACITY AT SUPRANATIONAL LEVEL for macroeconomic stabilisation in deep crises. The review of the ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK, which was launched by the Commission in February 2020 and postponed because of the pandemic, provides a GOOD OPPORTUNITY TO INCORPORATE THESE IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS.” (NGEU stands for “Next Generation European Union”).
From the EU’s own website: “Once the economic and financial crisis (of 2008/9) was overcome, the EU established a process aimed at reinforcing the architecture of EMU (ECONOMIC and monetary UNION). The process is based on the Five Presidents’ Report on Completing Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union of 2015, which focused on four main issues:
• A genuine ECONOMIC UNION;
• A FINANCIAL UNION;
• A FISCAL UNION;
• A POLITICAL UNION.
These four unions are STRICTLY INTER-RELATED and would develop in parallel. The report was followed by a series of communications, proposals and measures, and the discussion is still ongoing.”
In 2022 all member states reaffirmed their commitment to economic union, as part of Lisbon Treaty Article 3.
From the EU’s website (dated 29/4/24): “Today the Council adopted three pieces of legislation that will reform the EU’s ECONOMIC AND FISCAL GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK.
‘The main objective of the reform is to ensure sound and sustainable public finances, while promoting sustainable and inclusive growth in all member states through reforms and investment.
The new legislation will significantly improve the existing framework and provide effective and applicable rules for all EU countries. They will safeguard balanced and sustainable public finances, increase the focus on structural reforms and investments to spur growth and job creation throughout the EU. The time is now for a swift implementation’: Vincent Van Peteghem, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance of Belgium.”
2. THE EU’S MILITARY INTENTIONS
Lisbon Treaty Article 42.3: “Member states shall make civilian and MILITARY capabilities available to the Union for the implementation of the common security and defence policy, to contribute to the objectives DEFINED BY THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL.”
The EU’s military headquarters is the Kortenberg Building in Brussels.
The EU Global Strategy, 30th June 2016, issued exactly one week after the referendum, contains the right of the EU’s military “to act autonomously (of NATO) if and when necessary”.
It will need this, because, as you should know, Lisbon Treaty Article 42 commits member states to the defence of a member under attack. So if Ukraine is still under attack when it joins the EU, it will be the EU which is at war with Russia, not NATO. The defence of Ukraine doesn’t trigger the NATO charter.
On 19th February 2019 Federica Mogherini told an audience in Hamburg: “... all the way through the security spectrum, up to the military operations, because not so many know that the European Union has seventeen deployed missions and operations around the world. So, together, we are already a unique global security provider.” I checked this figure recently. It now stands at twenty-one.
On 23rd April 2019 the European Council issued its Military Command and Control Structures document, outlining its military command structure over member states’ land, sea and air forces. The diagram contained within reappears on the Wikipedia page for the Kortenberg Building, above.
In September 2021 Ursula Von der Leyen said this: “But what we need is the European Defence Union. In the last weeks there have been many discussions on expeditionary forces. On what type and how many we need: battlegroups or EU entry forces. This is no doubt part of the debate - and I believe it will be part of the solution. But the more fundamental issue is why this has not worked in the past. You can have the most advanced forces in the world - but if you are never prepared to use them - of what use are they?”
Last year the EU led joint military exercises in Spain. This is taken from the EU’s CSDP website: “The two-part MILEX 23 exercise commenced on 18 September and concluded on 22 October. The first part of this intense period was a 3-week planning phase by the MPCC in Brussels. In part two, this culminated in the EU’s first ever live military exercise from 16 - 22 October in Rota Naval Base, Cadiz, Spain. During Part 2, an EU Battlegroup-sized force carried out the Operational Plan developed by the MPCC in Part 1. Overall, 19 Member States contributed to MILEX 23.”
(CSDP = Common Security and Defence Policy. MPCC = Military Planning and Conduct Capability).
3. Reckless EU expansionism across Eastern Europe - widely known and reported on, including Albania (hotbed of gangsterism and corruption), Serbia and Montenegro (both traditional allies of Russia), Moldova (part of it coveted by Russia), Ukraine (currently at war with Russia), Turkey (instantly the largest, most populous and poorest country in the EU upon joining) and several others, all of which will bring nothing but a begging bowl to the EU’s table. Oh, except for Ukraine, because, as above, Lisbon Treaty Article 42 commits member states to the military aid of a member under attack. So if Ukraine is still at war upon its accession the EU will be at war with Russia.
4. Unfettered migration into Europe from North Africa and the Middle East (the free movement of people was a secret part of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership, in effect since 2010, and signed between the EU and Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt, Jordan, Israel, the Palestine Authority, Lebanon, Syria and Turkey). “Eurocrats do not consider (migration) to be a problem, but rather as a project”: Fabrice Leggeri, former Director of the European Border and Coastguard Agency (Frontex). "The European Union and all leaders of all European nations MUST USE IMMIGRATION to undermine the homogeneity and ethnic identity of the native European people no matter how difficult this will be to explain to the citizens of their nations. This must happen, THIS WILL HAPPEN for globalism to take hold of Europe" - Peter Sutherland speaking in the House of Lords in 2014.
All this has been going on while you’ve been asleep for the last fifteen years.
Do you just copy and paste the same sentence?
I have responded to you previously but you just ignored my answers@SJG-nr8uj
@@michaelclayton5124 Maybe it didn't come through, sorry. Sometimes I don't receive notifications. Anyhow, your answers should have looked something like this.
1. THE EU’s FEDERAL INTENTIONS (ie. to make one big country)
Lisbon Treaty Article 3.4: “The Union shall establish an ECONOMIC and monetary UNION whose currency is the euro.”
EU Five Presidents’ Report, 2015: “Progress MUST HAPPEN on four fronts: first, towards a genuine ECONOMIC UNION that ensures each economy has the structural features to prosper within the Monetary Union. Second, towards a FINANCIAL UNION that guarantees the integrity of our currency across the Monetary Union and increases risk-sharing with the private sector. This means completing the Banking Union and accelerating the Capital Markets Completing Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union. Third, towards a FISCAL UNION that delivers both fiscal sustainability and fiscal stabilisation. And finally, towards a POLITICAL UNION that provides the foundation for all of the above through genuine democratic accountability, legitimacy and institutional strengthening.”
Angela Merkel’s immediate response to the referendum result, 24th June 2016: “Today is a watershed moment for Europe, and it is a watershed moment for the EUROPEAN UNIFICATION PROCESS. There is no doubt that this is a blow to Europe, and to the EUROPEAN UNIFICATION PROCESS.”
EU Rome Declaration, 25th March 2017: “Working towards COMPLETING the ECONOMIC and monetary UNION” (with a preferred deadline for completion of 2027).
ECB’s ‘Fiscal Implications of the EU Recovery Package’ 2020. “The way that the EU has responded to the crisis also has implications for the future design and implementation of the EUROPEAN GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK. First, while expansionary fiscal policy is necessary to sustain the recovery, going forward it will be important for the fiscal rules to effectively support the reduction of high government debt in good economic times. Second, NGEU constitutes a new and innovative element of the EUROPEAN FISCAL FRAMEWORK. It will result in the issuance of sizeable supranational debt over the coming years, and its establishment has signalled a political readiness to design a common fiscal tool when the need arises. This innovation, while a one-off, could also imply lessons for ECONOMIC and Monetary UNION, which still lacks a PERMANENT FISCAL CAPACITY AT SUPRANATIONAL LEVEL for macroeconomic stabilisation in deep crises. The review of the ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK, which was launched by the Commission in February 2020 and postponed because of the pandemic, provides a GOOD OPPORTUNITY TO INCORPORATE THESE IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS.” (NGEU stands for “Next Generation European Union”).
From the EU’s own website: “Once the economic and financial crisis (of 2008/9) was overcome, the EU established a process aimed at reinforcing the architecture of EMU (ECONOMIC and monetary UNION). The process is based on the Five Presidents’ Report on Completing Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union of 2015, which focused on four main issues:
• A genuine ECONOMIC UNION;
• A FINANCIAL UNION;
• A FISCAL UNION;
• A POLITICAL UNION.
These four unions are STRICTLY INTER-RELATED and would develop in parallel. The report was followed by a series of communications, proposals and measures, and the discussion is still ongoing.”
In 2022 all member states reaffirmed their commitment to economic union, as part of Lisbon Treaty Article 3.
From the EU’s website (dated 29/4/24): “Today the Council adopted three pieces of legislation that will reform the EU’s ECONOMIC AND FISCAL GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK.
‘The main objective of the reform is to ensure sound and sustainable public finances, while promoting sustainable and inclusive growth in all member states through reforms and investment.
The new legislation will significantly improve the existing framework and provide effective and applicable rules for all EU countries. They will safeguard balanced and sustainable public finances, increase the focus on structural reforms and investments to spur growth and job creation throughout the EU. The time is now for a swift implementation’: Vincent Van Peteghem, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance of Belgium.”
2. THE EU’S MILITARY INTENTIONS
Lisbon Treaty Article 42.3: “Member states shall make civilian and MILITARY capabilities available to the Union for the implementation of the common security and defence policy, to contribute to the objectives DEFINED BY THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL.”
The EU’s military headquarters is the Kortenberg Building in Brussels.
The EU Global Strategy, 30th June 2016, issued exactly one week after the referendum, contains the right of the EU’s military “to act autonomously (of NATO) if and when necessary”.
It will need this, because, as you should know, Lisbon Treaty Article 42 commits member states to the defence of a member under attack. So if Ukraine is still under attack when it joins the EU, it will be the EU which is at war with Russia, not NATO. The defence of Ukraine doesn’t trigger the NATO charter.
On 19th February 2019 Federica Mogherini told an audience in Hamburg: “... all the way through the security spectrum, up to the military operations, because not so many know that the European Union has seventeen deployed missions and operations around the world. So, together, we are already a unique global security provider.” I checked this figure recently. It now stands at twenty-one.
On 23rd April 2019 the European Council issued its Military Command and Control Structures document, outlining its military command structure over member states’ land, sea and air forces. The diagram contained within reappears on the Wikipedia page for the Kortenberg Building, above.
In September 2021 Ursula Von der Leyen said this: “But what we need is the European Defence Union. In the last weeks there have been many discussions on expeditionary forces. On what type and how many we need: battlegroups or EU entry forces. This is no doubt part of the debate - and I believe it will be part of the solution. But the more fundamental issue is why this has not worked in the past. You can have the most advanced forces in the world - but if you are never prepared to use them - of what use are they?”
Last year the EU led joint military exercises in Spain. This is taken from the EU’s CSDP website: “The two-part MILEX 23 exercise commenced on 18 September and concluded on 22 October. The first part of this intense period was a 3-week planning phase by the MPCC in Brussels. In part two, this culminated in the EU’s first ever live military exercise from 16 - 22 October in Rota Naval Base, Cadiz, Spain. During Part 2, an EU Battlegroup-sized force carried out the Operational Plan developed by the MPCC in Part 1. Overall, 19 Member States contributed to MILEX 23.”
(CSDP = Common Security and Defence Policy. MPCC = Military Planning and Conduct Capability).
3. Reckless EU expansionism across Eastern Europe - widely known and reported on, including Albania (hotbed of gangsterism and corruption), Serbia and Montenegro (both traditional allies of Russia), Moldova (part of it coveted by Russia), Ukraine (currently at war with Russia), Turkey (instantly the largest, most populous and poorest country in the EU upon joining) and several others, all of which will bring nothing but a begging bowl to the EU’s table. Oh, except for Ukraine, because, as above, Lisbon Treaty Article 42 commits member states to the military aid of a member under attack. So if Ukraine is still at war upon its accession the EU will be at war with Russia.
4. Unfettered migration into Europe from North Africa and the Middle East (the free movement of people was a secret part of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership, in effect since 2010, and signed between the EU and Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt, Jordan, Israel, the Palestine Authority, Lebanon, Syria and Turkey). “Eurocrats do not consider (migration) to be a problem, but rather as a project”: Fabrice Leggeri, former Director of the European Border and Coastguard Agency (Frontex). "The European Union and all leaders of all European nations MUST USE IMMIGRATION to undermine the homogeneity and ethnic identity of the native European people no matter how difficult this will be to explain to the citizens of their nations. This must happen, THIS WILL HAPPEN for globalism to take hold of Europe" - Peter Sutherland speaking in the House of Lords in 2014.
This is what sixteen million Remainers voted for. Plenty of time to have found all this out between then and now.
The rich ones (also called armchair farmers) who rent out or lease their farms and meadows to real farmers.
Armchair farmers?
You are confusing the terminology with "armchair expert" who is someone who will pontificate and spout on a subject that they have no experience of.
Farmers can be landowners. But not all landowners can be farmers.
Farmers actually apply themselves to the land and animals.
A Landowner "amen" will never be a farmer and not in the business of agriculture.
I hope the polls are right 🤞🏻.
The turkeys voted for christmas and now complain about getting stuffed?
1. Starmer is the glove-puppet of Tony Blair, who is, in turn, the glove-puppet of the EU and the WEF. We voted to leave the giant, duplicitous, megalomaniac scam.
2. Labour is in thrall to the Muslim block vote, which means that immigration will accelerate.
3. Labour wants to hand the vote to suitably-brainwashed schoolchildren, who think that taxpayers' money grows on trees.
How could any sane individual vote for Starmergeddon?
How many farmers do you know personally that are complaining?
Precisely 100% correct
Blaming the voter is a bad strategy. It causes resentment amongst those voters so they stick to voting for the same thing out of spite.
@@L9MN4sTCUk This is a complete misunderstanding of what is going on:
1. 2016. The electoral majority of the British electorate voted to leave the giant, duplicitous, megalomaniac scam known as the European Union (which is currently working on fiscal union, in advance of economic union, in advance of political unification, as well as putting its armed forces together, on a collision course for war with Russia).
2. 2017. 84% of MPs are elected to Parliament on the manifesto pledge to respect the referendum result. Many, once elected, spend the next three years doing the exact opposite and trying to sabotage the result.
3. 2019. The electorate clears out the saboteurs and hands Boris an electoral mandate to get Brexit done.
4. 2024. The main problem vexing voters is the unfettered immigration, that is transforming the country, and includes among the migrants, criminals and those who wish to overthrow us. Inevitably there is, to every action, an equal and opposite reaction. And since Labour and the Tories are both part of the problem, with no intention of sorting it, where should the average voter now turn?
You can’t get rid of the Brexit trade barriers. The agreement is up for “review” next year but the uk won’t be getting anything that would have to be offered to any other 3rd country. The “less red tape” Brexit that was wanted was given to you. Unfortunately now too many people don’t want THAT Brexit, they wanted another one. Well hey, be careful what you wish for because you might just get it and Starmer, much as I think he will be good for the uk can do sweet nothing about it.
The stupidity of all this is our food security is at its most perilous since forever.
They promised. Boris Johnson promised. But we all know what became of those promises. Don’t we????
Plenty of Tory placards in Farmers fields where I am. Crocodile tears, farmers will still overwhelmingly vote Tory
At least Starmer is recognising Brexit problems and talking about addressing them; however he's still clear on making Brexit work.
He will learn the two objectives are incompatible, and Starmer is going to have to decide whether addressing Brexit problems or Making Brexit Work is the better option...
vote LIB Dems or Greens you should start a farmers' party
Greens are a lost cause
I’ve already voted SNP. I would’ve preferred to vote Labour but think tactical voting against the Tories is more important for now. I want proportional representation (PR) so, when the results are in, I’ll be writing to the Labour candidate to let him know that if we had PR he would’ve had my vote.
Labour needs to pick up more rural constituencies because they need to have people who understand what really happens in rural areas. A perfect example is part of Labours campaign is saying that there will be more police on our streets. I live in a major City but even I have heard of the epidemic of criminal gangs operating in rural communities. Maybe if Labour said they would be having greater police resources in the country then more farmers would get on board.
We need to get rid of this divide in the country between rural and urban where neither side understands the other or at the moment seems to want to.
We all get one vote, my advice is use it wisely. This election is not about what we want it's about what we don't want.
1. Starmer is the glove-puppet of Tony Blair, who is, in turn, the glove-puppet of the EU and the WEF. We voted to leave the giant, duplicitous, megalomaniac scam.
2. Labour is in thrall to the Muslim block vote, which means that immigration will accelerate.
3. Labour wants to hand the vote to suitably-brainwashed schoolchildren, who think that taxpayers' money grows on trees.
How could any sane individual vote for Starmergeddon?
While I agree with much of what you say - its well known that many farmers have traditionally been Tory supports. I would guess a great many were taken in by Brexit and voted for Brexit. So its ironic that farmers are now complaining about Brexit.
I grew up in Cheshire - farmers were/are Tory dairy farmers wall to wall.
Liz, love your informative videos, please keep them coming. It is disappointing to hear you say that Labour have not got much in their manifesto reference farming. However, if they do get in could that change to accommodate a better deal for farming in the U.K. ?
I will continue to lobby Labour on farming. Hopefully they will listen. The Tories have been such a disaster!
Starmer's a very rich activist lawyer,...what does he know about doing a deal...let alone with the sharks in Brussels
who ripped the UK off during 47 wasted years in the EUSSR?
@@lizwebstersbf
"The National Farmers’ Union lobbied to increase the amount of pesticides allowed in the UK’s drinking water and to allow farmers to spread manure more frequently as part of a post-Brexit loosening of environmental regulations" The Guardian , May 10th 2024
The EU 🇪🇺 won't grant the UK a 'better deal'. 2 reasons:
1) third country is third country - the EU's red lines as regards to the protection of her SM will not be softened just because one random 3rd country has problems. The UK knew the red lines when voting.
2) the 'deal' = TCA will not be renegotiated. As stated innumerable times by the EU.
Greetings from civilization 🇪🇺
@@Ooze-cl5txNow, that'll surely convince us EU27 🇪🇺 to instantly open the gates to our SM pour les rosbifs - our own disgruntled farmers will be delighted to their SM flooded with sub-standard Breeeteeesh muck. 😎
/s
Do farmers know that they're going through the bad times bc of Brexit? Or they think it's because of locusts, Corbyn etc.?
Depends on the farmer and what they believe.
Never believe polls or allow them to influence your vote; consider polls as being created for a defined outcome, a bit like projection target goals in business.
Everybody g out and vote NOT TORY! As for reform, they know nothing about farming.
Labour aren't saying much about anything , so you farmers are not alone !
Thanks Liz a good video
I hope more voters will see it that way - it makes more sense.
Liz at the end of the day you will expect labour to sort things, ? After six months you will complain labour not sorting it, they will need several years to make good this Brexit mess,
Are you kidding me Ray🤔🤣🤣🤣
@@martin4787 yes it will take several years to sort this Brexit mess, just listened to a report on the drop of cheese exports,
Plus the way the trade figures are manipulated by gold dealing,
@@raymondwebb4179 We can't produce enough cheese to satisfy the UK market and the reason gold is such an in demand commodity is because the Pound is worthless on the currency markets because the national debt is so high, due to the dogma of the globalist high tax and spend.
Surely something could've been done in 14 years.
Hopefully sanity prevails and the eviction to number 10 is delivered.
I agree with what has been said about the polls. But to me an even bigger problem is people assuming Labour have won so they don't need to vote. As we have seen in the past.
Vote green or libdems, and then talk to them???? They are both parties you can speak to.
We’ve got moaning whinging farmers in NZ too, seems to be universal.
Brexit mess
Farmers in North West Norfolk have all got massive Vote Tory boards in their fields. No Brexit worries there!
I agree that sadly the labour manifesto on the face of it does not promise as much as we would like, but there is more substance in there , its simply labour can not promise exact specifics on what they can exactly get from a negation on the Brexit deal, which we all need to bring growth, which ultimately is labours policy. I feel it may be a long road back but this is a first step to put this country back on its feet, so there will be many more to come and for the sake of us all, we can not afford another five years of Tory empty lies and broken promisers.
If you suffer from amnesia and cannot remember the last 14 years (May, Johnson, Truss, Sunak). Then you can believe Rishi is a new broom not linked to the past who will carry out manifesto pledges unlike 2019.
Nobody forces farmers to vote tory - but they will.
Clearly leftoid you don't and never have lived in a rural community.
@@martin4787 Enlighten us then, how many rural areas had a Tory MP vs how many had a non-Tory one ?
@@Ooze-cl5tx Most of them in 2019 GE
@@martin4787
So you claim they switched from Labour to Tory because of Brexit?
Still, it would be more informative with the real numbers of Tory MPs from the 2019 GE compared to the numbers from the lets say 3 GEs before that, right?
@@Ooze-cl5tx No I'm not saying that. Most rural areas have traditionally been tory, that's a known fact. If you want accurate numbers then look it up.
Just got back from a break in North Norfolk, seems a few farmers still aren't convinced that the Tory party are a bad bet judging by the tory posters on display.
I am suprise at the high number of reform posters in our area. Reminds me of the brexit party. Lot money coming from somewhere. I see the telegraph is slowly dropping support for Tories and moving to support Reform
It will be a record! A record low turnout.
Mr Campbell we dont believe a word you say, Brexit was never implemented.
But but what if they are right? Next Friday is going to be glorious
1. Starmer is the glove-puppet of Tony Blair, who is, in turn, the glove-puppet of the EU and the WEF. We voted to leave the giant, duplicitous, megalomaniac scam.
2. Labour is in thrall to the Muslim block vote, which means that immigration will accelerate.
3. Labour wants to hand the vote to suitably-brainwashed schoolchildren, who think that taxpayers' money grows on trees.
How could any sane individual vote for Starmergeddon?
The tory manifesto is just words. And the farmers so stupid to believe them again after Brexit. Look at the deals struck with Australia and NZ for example. The fishing was industry is another example.
Aussies still laugh about those deals. Pls keep sending the Doctors and Nurses too.
Labour is going to win the election and form a government. How much of a majority, is the only unknown. What it won't be is a 'super majority' as that term is irrelevant in the UK. The real concern is who will form the opposition. Preferably the LibDems, then the Tories, the SNP, Plaid Cymru, Greens, DUP and preferably no Reform, but if they manage to get a seat, then limited to one and not Farage's.
Hi Liz, really enjoy but a major point. I live in a 'first wave' red wall ie 2015 in Sherwood. And now surrounded by Red wall seats. I can advise those new Tory MPs have not leveled up or fought to improve those areas. It was excused by Jeremy Corbyn, then Covid, Ukraine etc etc why nothing improved. The red wall seats have gone backwards with utter BS filling filling the void. Levelling up DOES NOT exist. Sherwood is a fairly mixed area on two big ex- mining towns in Ollerton & Hucknall (cheers Tories) and rural villages. It's this village vote (why when they need the NHS) that sway the vote as the working class areas are generally apathetic. Our MP Mark Spencer has basically done nothing and he supposedly is a farmer. I have noticed a drift from crops to fields of pigs. Is that the normal? Keep up the good stuff.
Yes but they stopped the USA FTA nightmare and ravaging destruction of our farming and welfare state.
I can understand the logic in your voting intentions .
Also as a profession farming has a very high suicide rate which is an indication of just how bad things are .
The Tories can offer anything and everything it's too damn late now , never ever again with the Tories .
1. Starmer is the glove-puppet of Tony Blair, who is, in turn, the glove-puppet of the EU and the WEF. We voted to leave the giant, duplicitous, megalomaniac scam.
2. Labour is in thrall to the Muslim block vote, which means that immigration will accelerate.
3. Labour wants to hand the vote to suitably-brainwashed schoolchildren, who think that taxpayers' money grows on trees.
How could any sane individual vote for Starmergeddon?
Never seen a farmer on a bike...don't worry about them.
You never see an expert doing. They are never to be seen when the work is being done but appear by magic afterwards, wanting to offer advice on how it could/should have been done.
Basically, they are totally useless and can't do anything on their own. They could, however, talk themselves to the top of Everest.
Farming is in my family & I have total admiration for them & choose British produce over all else
However, choosing a picture of Alistair Campbell on this video as an advert to vote Labour, you can count me out!
None of the farmers around me are struggling but have you seen the farmers in the EU? Methinks our farmers are delighted they didn't have to bow down to EU rules.
Not you of course Liz, you seem unable to function properly due to your intransigent rage over Brexit.
The Tories are going to be wiped out due to the complete contempt they have shown to the electorate since 2019. But the votes aren't going to Labour.
Reform is here, Nigel is back and he will be PM in 2029, if we survive the incoming Labour government of course.
😂
Absolutely 0 sympathy for Farmers, you got what you have voted for, for years. You drove down wages for UK workers and rushed for cheap labour from the EU. Then you voted to ban the cheap EU workers.
Please tell us what you know about EU fiscal union, EU economic union, EU political union, the unification of member states’ armed forces under command of the European Council, the reckless expansionism of the EU across Eastern Europe, and the unfettered migration into the EU from North Africa and the Middle East, at the EU’s open invitation. All the stuff that sixteen million Remoaners voted for without realising it!
They either gonna vote tories or reform :D
Vote Reform
The Tories are a busted flush. 17.4 million Leavers will be voting Reform.
@@martin4787 How about do not vote reform nor tories because both are idiots that initiated the single most harmful action to the UK?
Blaming the polls again that's what started this trouble in the first place😅
Its going to be interesting to hear what Liz has to say about the latest EU Tax, its only 80 Pounds a cow Tax that has just been introduced in Denmark. The British Farmers have had a very lucky escape with Brexit
I think you will vote in a large Labour caucus, which in itself is a real problem, as there is only so.much money, only so many jobs to give out to a caucus. This will cause a internal issue.
I think there are opperational boarder processes that can be imporoved betweed the UK abd the EU, but there wont be any rejoining the single market on the cards.
The best fsrners can.hope for is to restructure into larger farms investing in technology to.mske them more efficient.
You are correct a massive majority will bring it's oan problems,as if your country hasn't enough problems
How many of you here with some very strong opinions and views are actually farmers or involved in agricultural businesses?
Oh look, someone actually believing a word that comes out of Alistair 'Dodgy Dossier' Campbell's mouth. Liz Webster scraping the barrel yet again!
Vote Reform UK
No thanks, I'm not a racist khunt.
Bot.. auto
Nice property for a struggling farmer
This is scraping the barrel, in desperation dragging Blair's Liar-in-Chief out, bring on another clown John Major or even Blair himself.
Vote reform🇬🇧
Farmers vote tory. Tories gave us brexit. Tough siht 😂