Is MAHARAJ Exploiting HINDUISM? Maharaj Netflix Film/Movie Review
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 08. 2024
- Most controversial movie of 2024 Maharaj, which is also the debut film of Junaid Khan, Aamir Khan's Son, has now finally released on Netflix. Is Maharaj Anti Hindu, or hurting/exploiting Hindu sentiments in the name of entertainment or is it just another bollywood film which is getting wrongly criticised?
The movie that just went live on #netflixindia yesterday is based on the 1862 Maharaj Libel Case. I hope you like the Maharaj Movie Review & Analysis | Junaid Khan | Shalini Pandey | Sharvari Wagh | Jaideep Ahlawat | Netflix India
Maharaj Movie Review
Maharaj Netflix Film Review
What do you think?
If you like this informative content don't forget to share and like this video.
Make sure to Subscribe:
Follow me on Instagram for short form content : /movieswithapoorv
ABOUT ME :
Hi, My name is Apoorv Chaudhary and I am 27 years old. This channel is all about my love for movies and how I can help people make better choices when deciding which movies to watch or skip.
Hindu dharm ke thekedaro ko hamesha taklif होती है जब सच सामने आता हैं
Bilkul sahi bola
To chacha Hinduism ko hi target kyu. G me d ho to muslim k thekedaro ko v bnao. Secular chacha😂
Great movie. Karsandas like many others keep Sanatan Dharma safe when deviations occur. Even in Bhagavad Gita Krishna speaks about protecting from deviations. Infact Ram, Krishna, Bhuddha and Caitanya were all disruptors. Cleaned up house when deviations took place. That is why Sanatan dharma as lasted 5,000 + years continuously. The litmus test of any true guru is their ability to control their senses.
Perfectly summed up. India is lacking behind because of these gurus
@@apoorvandmovies Yeah they bring disrupt to Hinduism. Therefore it is import to have these discussions no matter how painful. Actually Hinduism is based on debate. Gurus always assembled and had philosophical debates. This kept the caliber of gurus at a high level.
Please stop spreading misinformation about Karsandas Mulji. Karsandas Mulji was highly influenced by British Protestant Christianity. His work "Niti Vachan" or Moral training (1859) is full of his ideas of what reform to him meant i.e Christian Protestant ethics, virtues and self-discipline. So, his critique of the Pushtimarg was coming from a Christian perspective rather than from the view point a Hindu reformist saddened by the state of affairs in his religion. Also, the film has removed the character of John Wilson, a scottish christian missionary who was projected by the court as a indologist and a scholar of pushtimarg. During the trial, he made several objectionable remarks on Lord Krishna. Also, the judgement vilifies Krishna specifically and all Krishna Bhakti sampradyas in general by accusing them of being driven by lust and encouraging debauchery. Not to mention that the whole case was based on hearsay incidents narrated by witnesses like Lakshmidas Khimji and Mathuradas Lowjee. In short none of the witnesses actually saw the so called "charanseva". Hence, there were no "criminal charges" pressed against the maharaj, which is claimed in the movie.
what if they make similar movie on pastors or maulanas who did same, they will not cause only hindus are tolerant
Most of population of indian are We hindus , we should know about truth about our religion so no Pakhandi baba can manipulate us.
@@ganeshkadam5864 Truth about Hindu religion -Hindu religion never teach follow Pakhandi baba.
Its a similar concept of dev dasi which is very well known practice in india .
There are many many such incidents like the breast tax in some south indian states .
Defenetly we have come a long way from that .
There is no mention or sanction in shastras to xually exploit Deva dasis,
Their primary Job is to collect goods for Puja, propagate Arts, devotional dance,bhajans etc.
It's the missionaries who vilified Devadasi, Ratha Yatra, and Made up cases of self_emolation(termed as sati) so it would be easier for them to have a say in Govt because they were kept away from British govt.
The so called bre_ast tax has no historical basis it's based on a poem, UPWORD has a detailed video on this.
Bhai ye bilakul galt hai ise dilit kar de tuje pata nahi hai tu kiya bol rha hai mere pass grnth usme sachi bat likhi hai ye ak angrejo ki chal hai dost meri bat man ye dilit kar de tuje jo pese milenge vo bhagwan de denge
आप का कहना सही है
Do you know dev dasi parampara?
Tera baba tharki nikla toh usme angrezon ki chaal kaise ho gayi?
घंटा
@@clintonbenjamin5510 Please stop spreading misinformation about Karsandas Mulji. Karsandas Mulji was highly influenced by British Protestant Christianity. His work "Niti Vachan" or Moral training (1859) is full of his ideas of what reform to him meant i.e Christian Protestant ethics, virtues and self-discipline. So, his critique of the Pushtimarg was coming from a Christian perspective rather than from the view point a Hindu reformist saddened by the state of affairs in his religion. Also, the film has removed the character of John Wilson, a scottish christian missionary who was projected by the court as a indologist and a scholar of pushtimarg. During the trial, he made several objectionable remarks on Lord Krishna. Also, the judgement vilifies Krishna specifically and all Krishna Bhakti sampradyas in general by accusing them of being driven by lust and encouraging debauchery. Not to mention that the whole case was based on hearsay incidents narrated by witnesses like Lakshmidas Khimji and Mathuradas Lowjee. In short none of the witnesses actually saw the so called "charanseva". Hence, there were no "criminal charges" pressed against the maharaj, which is claimed in the movie.
Review ke sath sath kafi knowledgeable talk around the movies❤
Are thank you bhai. Glad you noticed
Did he just say “ movie main dikhaya Gaya tho sach hi hoga “ 😂😂😂😂😂, agar tumhe logo ko convince karna hi hain tho you could have taken example of Asaram Baba
A movie is made with a lot of research cos they also know that they will get a lot of backlash. They do their research and infact I also did mine and this story is true
@@apoorvandmovies backlash is for not exposing baba, it is for the point of view of the protagonist. You’re right, Hinduism is about seeking and not believing and that's not shown correctly.
The point is people who made Adipurush also said that they did research, but we know how turned out. This movie has some mistakes when it comes to timeline, poor production design and editing.
Normally, when you want to verify something, you put it forward with your research points and what they showed in a movie.
You’re an influencer what you say is matters a lot these days because people will reference what you say for their research and thought process about something, that’s why I said what I said. Overall, I loved how you taught viewers positive approach to look at the movie first instead of just bashing it directly.
However, you need to understand the difference between "Culture" and " Religion" The things protagonist " questioned" in movie are culture he is fight with A CULT which are almost same everywhere in the world and not Hindu Religion. What the JJ baba did, is not part of Hinduism, Auratho ka "Ghungat" is not a part of Hindu religion that's a culture, this is soo basic and shown incorrectly in movie.
@@GoofyChaiLoverGirlwait till you realise how Narrative works,
From every other gunda, Chor,dakait in a long visible Tilak, to this it has only evolved.
A movie is made with lot of reserch like kerla fiels@@apoorvandmovies
Sayd tum hindu nai ho isliye tume ye film aachi lagi
🤣🤣🤣wa kya baat sch sunke kadva lga to sidha dusre ko anti hindu bol diya , tum jaiso ke wajse se hi ulta hinduo me ye dhongi baba bade bnte he aur apne dharm ko bdnam krte he
Great movie dekhkar pata lagta hai ki us zamane ke log kitne sidhe saadhe the
Us time k log chhuachhut or jaatpat k naam par logo ko bahut hi pareshan karte the
Lots of love to you brother
Haha Thank you keep supporting
Karsahn koi દૂધ થી ધોયા નહિ ઠા
WHAT HAPPENED MANY YEARS BACK IS WHAT THEY SAID IN THE MOVIE ..NOW WHATS THE CONTROVERSY HERE ....SOME SENSELESS PEOPLE/ ORGANISATION HAVE NOTHING ELSE TO DO IN LIFE SO CREATE CONTROVERSY AND MISLEAD THE BRAINLESS PEOPLE ... THIS IS A REALISTIC MOVIE AND WELL DIRECTED / PERFORMED MOVIE ...
That is absolutely right. I also can't see the controversy here
Please stop spreading misinformation about Karsandas Mulji. Karsandas Mulji was highly influenced by British Protestant Christianity. His work "Niti Vachan" or Moral training (1859) is full of his ideas of what reform to him meant i.e Christian Protestant ethics, virtues and self-discipline. So, his critique of the Pushtimarg was coming from a Christian perspective rather than from the view point a Hindu reformist saddened by the state of affairs in his religion. Also, the film has removed the character of John Wilson, a scottish christian missionary who was projected by the court as a indologist and a scholar of pushtimarg. During the trial, he made several objectionable remarks on Lord Krishna. Also, the judgement vilifies Krishna specifically and all Krishna Bhakti sampradyas in general by accusing them of being driven by lust and encouraging debauchery. Not to mention that the whole case was based on hearsay incidents narrated by witnesses like Lakshmidas Khimji and Mathuradas Lowjee. In short none of the witnesses actually saw the so called "charanseva". Hence, there were no "criminal charges" pressed against the maharaj, which is claimed in the movie.
Is Movie mei Brahmasambandh Shlok ka Galat meaning bataya gaya hai toh definitely Vaishnav Samaj ko hurt karnewali film hai 😡😡😡😡
Kya matlab bataya inhone?
@@apoorvandmovies Aap critics hai toh aap ne note kiya hoga
Mujhe to sahi laga but agar aapko galat laga to please bataiye kya galat tha
Gujrati mei clip share kari hai padh lijiye
Very well planned mind game to attack on one perticular religion using one perticular example on the name of so call public awareness.... Really?? It will be very much discomforting whenever we will be chanting all these sacred stotra and shloka..What was the reason to include all these in movies? Isn't that hurting Hinduism? Why couldn't Judge see it? and Hindu says it is eye opening...really?? Which era we are living in.. Cannot differentiate good vs wrong.. Is it Awakening?
Angrej ke jamane me bhagat sinh ko bhi court ne gadhhar bola tha... Vir savarkar ko bhi jel hui.. To kya ye sab bhi sach tha?
Aap galat angreji fesle ko sach story man bethe hai. Vaishnav vallabh kul koi sadhu sannyasi nahi hai vo sansari hi hai.. Jo aapne bivi bachhe ke sath rahete hai...
Agar aap bhagat sinh ko sahid mante ho to ye case ko भी jutha mano
asharam bapu , Ram rahim ko dekhe ho n aisa andhbhakti ke wajse maharaj jaise dhongi baba badhte he
@@ganeshkadam5864 Please stop spreading misinformation about Karsandas Mulji. Karsandas Mulji was highly influenced by British Protestant Christianity. His work "Niti Vachan" or Moral training (1859) is full of his ideas of what reform to him meant i.e Christian Protestant ethics, virtues and self-discipline. So, his critique of the Pushtimarg was coming from a Christian perspective rather than from the view point a Hindu reformist saddened by the state of affairs in his religion. Also, the film has removed the character of John Wilson, a scottish christian missionary who was projected by the court as a indologist and a scholar of pushtimarg. During the trial, he made several objectionable remarks on Lord Krishna. Also, the judgement vilifies Krishna specifically and all Krishna Bhakti sampradyas in general by accusing them of being driven by lust and encouraging debauchery. Not to mention that the whole case was based on hearsay incidents narrated by witnesses like Lakshmidas Khimji and Mathuradas Lowjee. In short none of the witnesses actually saw the so called "charanseva". Hence, there were no "criminal charges" pressed against the maharaj, which is claimed in the movie.
Boycott movies
Why?
FOR WHAT...DID YOU WATCH THE MOVIE???..
rehde de bhai wo ajeeb hai
bakwas movie. Boycott maharaj yashraj Aamir khan netflix n Saurabh shah.. pushtimarag sampraday ko badnam kar rahe ho.
Nahi aisa kuch bhi nahi hai, please pehle aap movie acche se dekh lo
Great movie. Ram, Krishna, Bhuddha and Caitanya were all disruptors. Cleaned up house when deviations took place. That is why Sanatan dharma as lasted 5,000 + years continuously. A true spiritual master is able to control their senses, not the other way around. Bhagavad Gita teaches to question and become enlightened.
@@sakshig6858 you don't know the siddant of pushtimarag.. you listen vidio of dhawal patel.. read sodash granth.. in which everything is written about pushtimarag.. in movie they show wrong things.. that s why boycott...
@@prenterprises915 ok. Will read and investigate. Question. Where JJ's activities in line with Sodash grantsh? That is the topic at hand. was there a deviation?
@@sakshig6858 That will always remain questionable given the fact that this case was heard under the Bristish rule who never understood what the principles of Sodash Granth stood for. Under it, commitment & devotion to only Krishna & Shreenathji bawa is spoken of. Now, whether or not this has been followed by JJ is one person's prerogative and falls within his character. His erring, if he did that is, doesn't dictate that its the failing of the entire faith itself. The movie completely disrespects and questions that faith of all of Pushtimarag which is why it is being opposed.
Aap ise pusti marg se nahi jod sakte
Bhai ❤
Thank you bhai ❤️
Koi Satay ghatana nahi he
Sach me? To fir wo libel case tha kya?
aaj kal sari movies aur series agenda ke liye hi banti hai. eg. anti hindu agenda, LGBTQ agenda, etc
no not every movie is like that
Good
Thank you
Bakwas movie vaishnav ko badnaam kiya h
Nahi aisa kuch nahi hai
Nahi bhai bilkul bhi nahi . Vaishnav samaj ko nahi uski ek galat parampara ko galat dikhaya hai.
Kya sati pratha ke khilaf Raja Ram Mohan Roy ne jo ladai ladi woh hindu samja ke khilaf thi nahi na
Ye toh mannana padega na ki aisi Kai galat pratha jaise dahej pratha baal vivah pratha sati pratha aur kai pratha ek waqt pe hamare samaj ka hissa thi toh kya jisne uske viruddh ladai ki woh sab hindu virodhi hain kya nahin na.
Bhai Aaj Jo aazdi se hum ji rahe hai woh aise hi Kai reforms ki wajeh se hain.
@@navinshringi4608 Vaishnavisum mei koi galat paramparae nahi hai ye so called logo ne galat paramparae follow karna suru ki hai Shree Vallabhacharya ka koi bhi Granth ye Parampara ko manyata nahi deta na hi woh aisee koi paramparao ko follow karne ke liye bola gaya hai
@@apoorvandmovies Please stop spreading misinformation about Karsandas Mulji. Karsandas Mulji was highly influenced by British Protestant Christianity. His work "Niti Vachan" or Moral training (1859) is full of his ideas of what reform to him meant i.e Christian Protestant ethics, virtues and self-discipline. So, his critique of the Pushtimarg was coming from a Christian perspective rather than from the view point a Hindu reformist saddened by the state of affairs in his religion. Also, the film has removed the character of John Wilson, a scottish christian missionary who was projected by the court as a indologist and a scholar of pushtimarg. During the trial, he made several objectionable remarks on Lord Krishna. Also, the judgement vilifies Krishna specifically and all Krishna Bhakti sampradyas in general by accusing them of being driven by lust and encouraging debauchery. Not to mention that the whole case was based on hearsay incidents narrated by witnesses like Lakshmidas Khimji and Mathuradas Lowjee. In short none of the witnesses actually saw the so called "charanseva". Hence, there were no "criminal charges" pressed against the maharaj, which is claimed in the movie.
@@navinshringi4608kitne pre colonial records Hai sati ke?
Veda themselves opposes sahagaman,
Kuch sati ke incidents ko itna badha chadha ke bataya taaki Missionaries ko Conversion Ka bahana mil jaaye...
Same with Jagannath Yatra etc.
Haatras wala baba
Where are Karsandas family now and where Maharaj disappeared?
I don't know about that
@@apoorvandmovies Please stop spreading misinformation about Karsandas Mulji. Karsandas Mulji was highly influenced by British Protestant Christianity. His work "Niti Vachan" or Moral training (1859) is full of his ideas of what reform to him meant i.e Christian Protestant ethics, virtues and self-discipline. So, his critique of the Pushtimarg was coming from a Christian perspective rather than from the view point a Hindu reformist saddened by the state of affairs in his religion. Also, the film has removed the character of John Wilson, a scottish christian missionary who was projected by the court as a indologist and a scholar of pushtimarg. During the trial, he made several objectionable remarks on Lord Krishna. Also, the judgement vilifies Krishna specifically and all Krishna Bhakti sampradyas in general by accusing them of being driven by lust and encouraging debauchery. Not to mention that the whole case was based on hearsay incidents narrated by witnesses like Lakshmidas Khimji and Mathuradas Lowjee. In short none of the witnesses actually saw the so called "charanseva". Hence, there were no "criminal charges" pressed against the maharaj, which is claimed in the movie.
Apko koy pta nahi he bolna nahi chahie
Best movie,real story
-10
⁰
Thanks
@@apoorvandmovies Please stop spreading misinformation about Karsandas Mulji. Karsandas Mulji was highly influenced by British Protestant Christianity. His work "Niti Vachan" or Moral training (1859) is full of his ideas of what reform to him meant i.e Christian Protestant ethics, virtues and self-discipline. So, his critique of the Pushtimarg was coming from a Christian perspective rather than from the view point a Hindu reformist saddened by the state of affairs in his religion. Also, the film has removed the character of John Wilson, a scottish christian missionary who was projected by the court as a indologist and a scholar of pushtimarg. During the trial, he made several objectionable remarks on Lord Krishna. Also, the judgement vilifies Krishna specifically and all Krishna Bhakti sampradyas in general by accusing them of being driven by lust and encouraging debauchery. Not to mention that the whole case was based on hearsay incidents narrated by witnesses like Lakshmidas Khimji and Mathuradas Lowjee. In short none of the witnesses actually saw the so called "charanseva". Hence, there were no "criminal charges" pressed against the maharaj, which is claimed in the movie.
Awesome movie 🎉
बकवास फ़िल्म, टोटल टाइम वेस्ट
Kis mayne me bakwas?
@@apoorvandmovies
कितने बार वही सब देखेंगे
देख देख के बोर गए ये सब
कुछ नया बनाना चाहिए साउथ वालो के जैसे
@@apoorvandmovies
फ़िल्म देखो मंजुमल बॉयज/ मयोन / शैतान / मराठी फ़िल्म (मुंज्या )
कम बजट की शानदार फ़िल्म
@@apoorvandmovies Please stop spreading misinformation about Karsandas Mulji. Karsandas Mulji was highly influenced by British Protestant Christianity. His work "Niti Vachan" or Moral training (1859) is full of his ideas of what reform to him meant i.e Christian Protestant ethics, virtues and self-discipline. So, his critique of the Pushtimarg was coming from a Christian perspective rather than from the view point a Hindu reformist saddened by the state of affairs in his religion. Also, the film has removed the character of John Wilson, a scottish christian missionary who was projected by the court as a indologist and a scholar of pushtimarg. During the trial, he made several objectionable remarks on Lord Krishna. Also, the judgement vilifies Krishna specifically and all Krishna Bhakti sampradyas in general by accusing them of being driven by lust and encouraging debauchery. Not to mention that the whole case was based on hearsay incidents narrated by witnesses like Lakshmidas Khimji and Mathuradas Lowjee. In short none of the witnesses actually saw the so called "charanseva". Hence, there were no "criminal charges" pressed against the maharaj, which is claimed in the movie.
But in Vaishnav religion you can't question. You have to believe your granthas & holy sages.