Finally! I have been trying to embed my building into the toposurface, this can be adapted to any construction like that.. It is important to point out that this should be done when the toposurface editing is finalized so that the gradation remains uniform.
Nice but only useful if you don't need sections or even Section Box views. Those will always show the topo fill of the split surface. Revit should really upgrade their topo tools to full boolean capabilities. For a software this old and expensive it is pathetic how little topo manipulation can be done. Come on Autodesk, move into the 20th Century!
Hi Balkan! i know that this is a nice way to finish a 3d modeling work to make some views and renders... but.. what about the architectural sections of that thing? i mean... that is a kind of trickie way to solve the bigest problem that is... that you cant cut the tunel volume from the toposurface! is there any way to build something between the topography? i mean... when you set an architectural section is there a way to see earth... then the building (roof or floor + space + floor+ building pad?) and then again earth?
Yep, exactly. I'm having the same problem too. This tutorial isn't really useful if it doesn't address this issue. The only solution I found is to model the terrain with Mass instead of topography. This gives you the ability create hollow sweep.
It seems very nice, but what appen if you cut inside the gallery with a section? Will the ground be inside the gallery? This video seems good just for 3D renderings, but for rendering other software are better than Revit (P.S. I like a lot this software with all its limits, but for engineering purposes it is not very good in every case).
hello BA, another awesome videos dude, are you able to post a video regarding a two way vaulted groin roof, that is carried out using adaptive modelling.
Ovo ima procenat iskoristivosti u projektu ili BIM dokumentaciji koliko i arhitekt u geotehnici..tu je za render Fokusiraj se legendo na arhitekturu i rendere objekata koji imaju konekciju sa zgradama i opremom zgrada, u stvarnim projektima ovo je 0
Finally! I have been trying to embed my building into the toposurface, this can be adapted to any construction like that..
It is important to point out that this should be done when the toposurface editing is finalized so that the gradation remains uniform.
I'm pretty sure you've saved countless lives / careers with your content. Thank you. lol!
As always you keep inventing new ways to do beautiful things! thank you
As always, brilliant! Thank you!
This is a life saver! Thank you!!!
Cool! Love your work dude :)
Nice but only useful if you don't need sections or even Section Box views. Those will always show the topo fill of the split surface. Revit should really upgrade their topo tools to full boolean capabilities. For a software this old and expensive it is pathetic how little topo manipulation can be done. Come on Autodesk, move into the 20th Century!
Thanks! FR-S - GT86 ftw!
INFORMATIVE
Hi Balkan! i know that this is a nice way to finish a 3d modeling work to make some views and renders... but.. what about the architectural sections of that thing? i mean... that is a kind of trickie way to solve the bigest problem that is... that you cant cut the tunel volume from the toposurface! is there any way to build something between the topography? i mean... when you set an architectural section is there a way to see earth... then the building (roof or floor + space + floor+ building pad?) and then again earth?
Yep, exactly. I'm having the same problem too. This tutorial isn't really useful if it doesn't address this issue. The only solution I found is to model the terrain with Mass instead of topography. This gives you the ability create hollow sweep.
@@DavidGoshadze Yes. That's what I'm doing if there is a necessity to show the c/s view of road excavation
Thanks dude, u are brilian
Amazing
brilliant of revit
THANKS
It seems very nice, but what appen if you cut inside the gallery with a section? Will the ground be inside the gallery? This video seems good just for 3D renderings, but for rendering other software are better than Revit (P.S. I like a lot this software with all its limits, but for engineering purposes it is not very good in every case).
Thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!
hello BA, another awesome videos dude, are you able to post a video regarding a two way vaulted groin roof, that is carried out using adaptive modelling.
Your awesome!
gracias!!
Nice sir
Sir tell us how to make a retaining wall in slope
When top and bottom thickness are different
modeling a generic model where is no data for volume, how frustrating the word I in BIM....
Ovo ima procenat iskoristivosti u projektu ili BIM dokumentaciji koliko i arhitekt u geotehnici..tu je za render
Fokusiraj se legendo na arhitekturu i rendere objekata koji imaju konekciju sa zgradama i opremom zgrada, u stvarnim projektima ovo je 0
My topo surface is solid not thin like urs
Hi sir I would like make Chinese roof can you help with that?
zaki hasmath i
Never import CAD!! This makes Revit files messy and polutes them with CAD elements. The proper way is to link the CAD.
Seriously?! lol