Three-Minute Legal Talks: The 303 Creative, LLC v. Elenis Supreme Court Case Explained

In the Supreme Court case 303 Creative, LLC v. Elenis, a graphic designer's religious beliefs clash with anti-discrimination laws. As the Court examines the intersection of free speech and public accommodations, the outcome has the potential for consequential repercussions concerning both creative expression and the LGBTQ community.
Theo Myhre, teaching professor at UW Law, provides an overview of the case and explains how this ruling creates a delicate balance between civil rights and freedom of speech, while also raising challenging questions about the limits of artistic autonomy and the scope of anti-discrimination protections.

[@kylefulmer163]

Great overview and thank you professor! Discussing this in a business law class within another institution. I found it refreshing to see a professor going the extra mile to engage their class and discuss what I imagine is a topic for discussion. I will be sharing this with my class in addition to my own collective thoughts. Hopefully, it will strike a spark for similar acts within my institution. For any students, please do not take this for granted. Taking my last two classes concurrently, and in all my classes inside of my institution, none have provided additional professor facilitated prompts or discussions at large via video or voice over as an avenue to connect and communicate with students. Thank you again! (Disclaimer: Remote learner.)

[@alx9r]

My impression from the oral arguments was that main questions of 303 Creative centered around the tension between what constitutes conduct versus speech. But your video doesn’t describe that tension. It seems to me the right to public accommodation can be in tension with the right not to speak things you disagree with. Instead the video highlights only the merits of entrenching public accommodation.
Shouldn’t a law school contemplate the entire picture? How will your students successfully argue for one side if they don’t understand the other? What is the point of such a “know your rights” style of video about recent decisions when it doesn’t even specify the rights in play in the decision?
Your video makes the viewer dumber.

[@dopechickensforlife7558]

real

[@dopechickensforlife7558]

blah blah blah liberal liberal liberal show both sides