Well the engine is only good with respect to its aircraft. So if that GE engine is used on a smaller aircraft it would make it overpowered or even burn unnecessarily more fuel.
@@stevesmoneypit6137 So much better that can't even get certified. Best along with Boeing in the same sentence is mostly a reason for laughs these days.
@@jgnclvgmng5408 But the same can be said for EU side. Without Airbus no one would be the counterweight against European airlines which aren't really happy with the Middle East carriers.
Airbus are outselling Boeing 3:2 so far this year, according to a French newspaper. However, order totals are now meaningless, because Boeing no longer has the capability to deliver orders like they used to. In the old days when both Airbus and Boeing could more or less produce the same number of aircraft per year, the "orders" comparison made more sense. Now it doesn't. They're rate-limited on 737MAX deliveries by the FAA because of the numerous QC failings. The point is that revenue comes from deliveries, not orders. Market share comes deliveries, not orders. And for deliveries, Boeing are now far behind Airbus. Airbus is predicting 770 deliveries in 2024. Boeing is apparently not giving any guidance at all, but seems to be trotting along at about half Airbus's rate. Really, the only meaningful way to compare the performance of the two companies is their net financial results. Airbus makes a big profit. Boeing makes a big loss, and seemingly has no way back to profitability (the order book is reported to be worth less than the growing debt). If that situation is sustained for a couple of years, the result is somewhat inevitable.
I suspect they will go for the A350, 777-F is too "last generation" I think unless offered as a loss leader heavily discounted price to deny Airbus the order, which I think Boeing is bleading too much cash to do that, is not forward looking enough for this order whilst the 777X-F simply has too much risk over the A350F with its certification delays and other quality issues from Boeing, thus A350F offe4s the sweet spot between latest technology v minimal risk.
Nah they won't, saudia always go for boeing widebodies in recent years, with the 787 10 order exactly matching the numbers of their in service a330 300, seems that they are turning to boeing for widebodies, and given their fleet of 777F, the a350F has no chance in getting that order unless with a significant discount, and also the a350F isn't certified yet and won't be soon, same as the 7778f
@@leebenjamin5790 Actually 50/50. Saudia had both 777 and A330 in fleet. And without Airbus who'd lobby favourable access to European market for them? Definitely not Lufthansa or Air France.
“If I say so myself” is an idiom used when you talk about something you yourself achieved. Not when you’re impressed with the achievements of others. Just saying…
Qatar picked up the extra London time slots, due to the Romanian carrier TAROM dropping theirs… the Romanian Govt needs to sell off that airline to Emirates or Etihad like the Serbs did with Air Serbia.
As much as I love the A350, I feel like they’ll end up buying the 777 for freight operations. The engine of the GE is too good to miss out
It will be easier to train 777F pilots to the 777X.
Well the engine is only good with respect to its aircraft. So if that GE engine is used on a smaller aircraft it would make it overpowered or even burn unnecessarily more fuel.
Great Video And Info
10 flights per day?? absolutely stunning
Heathrow is supposed to be busy. Very busy. A traffic jam even! No apologies to Snagglepuss. 😮
Thank you Dj!!
Qatar is kicking butt and taking manes.
Go, Airbus!
4:58, You mean QR672? You said QR627, instead of QR672.
He often makes mistakes. But we all do
I see.
Saudi always go to Boeing! I don't believe they will change for their cargo business.
Yes, too much political pressure for anything else to happen.
They buy the best!
@@stevesmoneypit6137 the best is yet to come! A350F the real game changer.
@@stevesmoneypit6137 So much better that can't even get certified. Best along with Boeing in the same sentence is mostly a reason for laughs these days.
@@jgnclvgmng5408 But the same can be said for EU side. Without Airbus no one would be the counterweight against European airlines which aren't really happy with the Middle East carriers.
This is funny. 350F getting certified. 🤔 It can barely carry people let alone freight
what do you mean barely carry people? if your talking about the a350, look to the 777x which has not carried any passangers
@@nagi4620 burn
The a350-1000 is 6 inches shorter than a 777-300er. Keep yapping.
What is the current order totals. Boeing vs Airbus?
Airbus are outselling Boeing 3:2 so far this year, according to a French newspaper.
However, order totals are now meaningless, because Boeing no longer has the capability to deliver orders like they used to. In the old days when both Airbus and Boeing could more or less produce the same number of aircraft per year, the "orders" comparison made more sense. Now it doesn't.
They're rate-limited on 737MAX deliveries by the FAA because of the numerous QC failings. The point is that revenue comes from deliveries, not orders. Market share comes deliveries, not orders.
And for deliveries, Boeing are now far behind Airbus. Airbus is predicting 770 deliveries in 2024. Boeing is apparently not giving any guidance at all, but seems to be trotting along at about half Airbus's rate.
Really, the only meaningful way to compare the performance of the two companies is their net financial results. Airbus makes a big profit. Boeing makes a big loss, and seemingly has no way back to profitability (the order book is reported to be worth less than the growing debt). If that situation is sustained for a couple of years, the result is somewhat inevitable.
@@abarratt8869 Thanks. Looks like many years of mismanagement and corporate greed have finally caught up to the company.
Qatar doing so well as compared to MH.
Boeing must develop a cargo plane bigger than the up-coming 777-8Freighter ,
Parbatipur অফিস
The wallets are aparently So large in the Saudi region they could afford both the 7778F And A350F... Who knows which way they'll lean
I suspect they will go for the A350, 777-F is too "last generation" I think unless offered as a loss leader heavily discounted price to deny Airbus the order, which I think Boeing is bleading too much cash to do that, is not forward looking enough for this order whilst the 777X-F simply has too much risk over the A350F with its certification delays and other quality issues from Boeing, thus A350F offe4s the sweet spot between latest technology v minimal risk.
Nah they won't, saudia always go for boeing widebodies in recent years, with the 787 10 order exactly matching the numbers of their in service a330 300, seems that they are turning to boeing for widebodies, and given their fleet of 777F, the a350F has no chance in getting that order unless with a significant discount, and also the a350F isn't certified yet and won't be soon, same as the 7778f
@@leebenjamin5790 Actually 50/50. Saudia had both 777 and A330 in fleet. And without Airbus who'd lobby favourable access to European market for them? Definitely not Lufthansa or Air France.
“If I say so myself” is an idiom used when you talk about something you yourself achieved. Not when you’re impressed with the achievements of others.
Just saying…
Qatar picked up the extra London time slots, due to the Romanian carrier TAROM dropping theirs… the Romanian Govt needs to sell off that airline to Emirates or Etihad like the Serbs did with Air Serbia.
Is the 777x freighter certified?
Lol....not before 2026 or later...
My question exactly. Boeing continues to be a sketchy choice.
Is the A350F certified ?
Not before 2026 or later...
Lol .
Already pushed back from 2025...
@@xkr510 so does airbus
@@patrickpeters2903 or later, we shall see