Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.
Equal Protection: How Does It Work?
Vložit
- čas přidán 30. 09. 2012
- The Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause is one of the iconic clauses of the Constitution. It has been the centerpiece of Supreme Court jurisprudence in desegregation, affirmative action, and voting rights. In this lecture, Dr. Lindsay Robertson outlines the levels of scrutiny used by the Supreme Court in evaluating Equal Protection cases.
Excellent discussion of our constitutional rights💯
You mean constitutionally protected rights. Rights are God given.
Thanks a lot for this content.
Great Content.
Thankyou!
IT IS TO BE INTERPITED IN THE WAY IT WAS WRITTEN
The problem is that it does not work. The reason is that the Supreme Court states that only when the States lack of actions are racially motivated are they unconstitutional.
I'm not going to agree with internment. And I won't say that appearance and ethnic and cultural differences (European v. Asian) didn't have anything to do with it. However, Japan was also the only country that attacked the United States in both its territories and the states. And, correct me if I'm wrong, the United States never faced an invasion threat from Germany or Italy--only from Japan. On the other hand, my father of German descent served in Navy. My Italian immigrant grandfather worked building LSD's (landing ship docks). His two sons served in the Army. And my mother worked where they built the bubbles for B-17 gunners. Really different treatment.
Oh, and the internment cases weren't technically equal protection cases--or not Fourteenth Amendment equal protection cases--since they applied to federal government action.
Last, might equal protection of federal laws be a Ninth Amendment right?
I’ve always though korematsu should’ve been a due process claim. one cannot be deprived of liberty absent due process.
Equal is equal, you shouldn't need all these discriminatory terms to make a equal protection clause vaild. How idiotic can these people be. Why should any of these terms have to come into play or even be mentioned. That just shows that government is continually discriminating.
It was a Democratically controlled Supreme Court, the Democrats believe in Divide and Control.
@GenocideTV
adding to your point, when qualified immunity afford some to harm others and face no consequence or same be indemnified by the victim and or 'the people' while others get prosecuted for doing same, trying to protect self or others from being harmed.
No More War
It Meant What It Said.
I sent my child to a school outside the district. I am now a convicted felon.
Becky murdered her husband. She's a convicted felon.
We are classed together as felons.
Jerry drove 20mph above the posted speed limit. He was convicted of a misdemeanor.
Kathy was convicted of a misdemeanor for walking nude along the boulevard.
They're both in a class of ordinance/code/some don't like your exercise of free expression, criminal violation, based on what's written by other people this day.
How is it that of the four mentioned above two lose their so-called right to participate in governmental process while the other two don't, as they shouldn't?
Isn't equal protection being violated?
why did the school district issue become a felony?
"Equal protection Clause: Section 1of 14th amendment states no state shall deny any person with in it's jurisdiction, equal protection of the law". Copy paste this.
How do we abolish unequal protection of our own at-will employment laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States? We should have no homeless problems in our at-will employment States with equal protection of our own laws. All laws of a general nature should have uniform operation. Merely requiring Cause for unemployment compensation in our At-Will employment State should be extra-Constitutional.
Organized stalking and covert harassment course of conduct crimes violate equal protection under law.
The court has to stop these theories and just apply the law how it is written.
They will never do that, only the people can do that.
@Genocide TV
being there's no honor among thieves, I do not subscribe to the contract/con situation the 'founding fathers' agreed to for their and their progeny's benefit.
But if SCOTUS did what it was established for, to ensure all subsequent legislation/laws/statutes/ordinances are in accordance with the tenets of that document, most theories and probably over regulations would cease and more semblance of freedom would be enjoyed by all.
This dude can cure insomnia.
If we the people are governed by our consent, how do we revoke that consent due to the "government" being more harmful, than beneficial to anybody, and everybody, other than itself.
You would have to research and then file your ucc filings, authentic your birth certificate frost with the sec.of state, and then through the state Dept, and through through a United States embassy in a nation that is not a member of the heag ( how ever it is spelled) such as Taiwan. There's only a few countries that are not part of the heag. Things like that separate one's self from the all capital letters name. All capital letters in the spelling of the name makes one a slave, a person, artificial person, citizen, government employee, taxpayer, and many more. None of witch was created by God there for dose not have any rights. I started by entering my birth certificate is a bond Into the goggle search bar, and went from there. One might put how to correct my status.
If you think government is harmful, try no-government. Law of the jungle.
@joebananstube
government is supposedly the people and derive power. Note government is powered by the actions of people.
When people fight back against people forcing the will of a few upon the many, that'll bode well for dismantling the tyranny under which we suffer.
We dont have equal protection. We are prohibited from doing many things our parents, grandparents and other ancestors had the right to do.
Pleed the fifth
Antislavery act 14th amendment blackman being called a freeman
How odd. Driving is not a right. And there is a duty of care for people issued licenses to perform thus 9:30 the opportunity to get glasses to remedy the deficiency of eye sight.
This highlights why the 14th amendment was poorly written.
I almost fell asleep listening to this guy, even though the material is good.
THE worst explanation of equal protection I have ever heard……..………………………………...AWFUL
Sex offenders are not protected
@combatvet11
Idk why you mentioned this class but neither are vets who suffered psychological harm during unjust campaigns on foreign, mainly Eurasian lands protected.
Many are trapped in prisons and homelessness!