DNA Reveals the Ancestry of Kennewick Man
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 08. 2024
- Delve into the captivating saga of Kennewick Man, an ancient skeleton that has sparked intense scientific and cultural debates. Unearthed in 1996 along the banks of the Columbia River in Washington state, this 8,700-year-old individual represents one of the oldest and most complete skeletons ever discovered in North America.
Data Source: Rasmussen, M., Sikora, M., Albrechtsen, A. et al. The ancestry and affiliations of Kennewick Man. Nature 523, 455-458 (2015). doi.org/10.103...
Music:
zero-project - The Great Spirit
www.zero-proje...
zero-project - Land of legends
www.zero-proje...
Visit MyHeritage DNA: www.myheritage...
The Corps of Engineers also dumped tons of gravel on the site where Kennewick man was found, precluding further discoveries.
How convenient. Afraid of something, are we?
@@kukuri007 on orders from Bill Clinton.
WELL the DEMS did NOT want any further discoveries casting doubt on WHO WERE THE FIRST AMERICANS!!!!!
I don’t understand why they would do something like that!! That’s so awful!!
Politics
This is sooo fascinating!!! Humans moved around, trading or looking for new places to live etc., much more than we ever knew. Thank you for all your hard work!!!!
WoW, great presentation! Very, very informative and fun to watch! Thanks to ALL involved!
I'm amazed by how the quality of your videos are improving over time! Great job!
Per 23andMe states I share the same paternal lineage as The Kennewick Man.
I also have recent admixture of Spanish, Apache then prior, Pueblo from my dads side.
Mexican, Coahuitec, Tarahumara from my moms side.
I am glad researchers continue finding out more about this fascinating topic and genealogy all together.
Both my parent’s lineage descended strait from Beringia into the Americas.
My mom being A2 ancestry, was landlocked for centuries and lived in Beringia.
My dad being QM3 having migrated through into PNW.
when a native tribe was defeated and essentially become extinct(all the men died) , the survivors which are often women are sent to other friendlier native tribes .
Well, I’m Lakota, and I’m here to tell you that is BS. The Taino of Puerto Rico lost all their Men to Spanish Butchery, Slaving and Eurasian Diseases, which is why Taino DNA (Y Chromasome) hasn’t been found, and give you one guess what the Spanish Conquerors did to the Women. That doesn’t mean the Taino ceased to exist, anymore than when the Russians enslaved Aleut Hunters from the Alaskan Islands for their Fur trade, and left the Women and Children to die on their Islands. But no, their were plenty AmerNDN Men who survived who were none to friendly with the Invading Conquerors. And for the Lakota, they won the Wars against the US, they did however lose the Peace because the IS Government violated the US Constitution when US Grant whored the US for gold. (Unilateral abrogation of the Fort Laramie Treaty of 1868 by the USA). Shameful.
@@maracohen5930 thats exactly what I mean most natives are ,like mongrels or mixtures of different tribes who went extinct.
@@maracohen5930 Btw are you pure-ish lakota? like maybe 85 percent or 50% ?
@@maracohen5930 You are a classic case of "you only hear what you wanna hear." the lakota won a major battle against theUS army led by Custer but, was ultimately defeated and was sent to the reservations. many of the lakota surrendered beforehand leaving only Sitting Bull with a few men to continue the fight. Lakota is one of the few tribes that survived.
EEUU must be the only country in the world that finds an 9,000 years old skeleton and destroys it in the name of politics
That's pretty much what happened.
@@davemiller6055How sad and ridiculous that is!
And destroyed the entire archeological site as well.
I live just a few miles from the site and it has ALWAYS MADE ME WONDER what might be buried in MY BACK YARD!
Something I wonder about. I believe the skeleton showed signs that might have indicated he died in battle. WELL when I was young, a neighbor was a avid arrow head collector and one day he took me to his favorite place, VERY near where Kennewick Man was found, to hunt for arrow heads. That day he found two!
It sounds like the Patrick Stewart initial analysis was correct. Its pretty easy for an anthropologist to identify
The video shows the exact opposite. That he looked like a non European both in features and in DNA.
Kennewick man was never DNA tested, but since we live in a world of feel good fantasy... who cares..
In Columbia's embrace, Kennewick Man,
Ancient whispers in the river's span.
Bones of time, a tale untold,
Echoes of history, strong and bold.
Some years ago they found the skeletol remains of a young girl in an under water cave system in Brazil that dated back 13,000 years.
That was Naia. But it is in Southern Mexico: el Hoyo Negro de Yucatán
@land980 yeah that's what I meant.
Opening scene is not Kennewick. It's way further down the Columbia River gorge, on the way to Portland, Oregon. Kennewick Man was found by some drunken revellers at the annual summer hydroplane races in a park along the water's edge. Corps of Army Engineers immediately took possession of everything but made the remains temporarily available for study. They were finally pressured by Native American groups to secure the site from further digging so they brought in a giant slab of concrete and, using a crane, laid it on top of the dig site, thereby crushing anything underground. Then dirt was piled on top and the site was made to, literally, disappear. To this day, there's not a trace of it left. This was all done rather quickly and on the QT, and was controversial as hell at the time. Earlier the first anthropologist on the case (Dr. Chatters) spent a fair amount of time with the remains and did not come to his conclusion lightly. His conclusion was that Kennewick Man was NOT Native American. I think the Kennewick Man story has been "white-washed" by special interests a lot. There's no longer a shred of physical evidence available for research. This could be a case of science, manipulated by politics.
I heard (and read) that the native tribe petitioned the gov't to close this down because it proved they were NOT the first people to inhabit that area. Therefore cancelling their claim for native fishing rights and such.
@@Paratrooper23 I followed the story while it happened and that was one of the political aspects, though there are other human remains older than Kennewick Man--Santa Rosa Island, Cal. with dates about 13k BCE. First People status was never really in dispute. But KM looked like an interloper. He ws likely murdered by local "First People."
@@ronagoodwell2709Your assumption is incorrect, Europeans were not here thousands of years ago.😂
@@jesshighland7177Europeans are not the only alternative to the position of First Peoples in the Americas. PS I never assumed one way or the other but merely pointed out the politics involved. And how the Kennewick Man story changed--more than once, until it finally landed on the conventional explanation.
@@ronagoodwell2709 "He was likely murdered by local First People." Did you even bother watching the video before making a comment? Based on the DNA analysis, Kennewick Man was a local who has close affiliation with modern native Americans.
Junks had a weak rudder connection. If they lost their rudder, they were left adrift on the north Pacific current.
During the first 100 years of the US paying attention to what was going on in the PNW, 100 Japanese, many adrift for a year or more, survived to reach shore in North America - and the number decreased through time as more whaling vessels were roaming the Pacific and able to rescue many more who were still at sea.
And that was people accidentally adrift. How reasonable is it to expect experienced groups hunting along the ice sheets to make it to the new world early?
Those of us who live in the area know that the story is not that tidy and clear cut. The bones were not allowed to be studies for a long time after the initial investigation. Initial reports said that there was a short sword found with Kennewick. That was scrubbed out of the news immediately.The European skull was challenged because the status quo of American history was that the native Americans were the first ones here so any skeleton that old must thereby only be a native American. Some said that if he was European then they had dated the skull wrong. There was a lot of argument about the body and the need for deeper study while the Army kept the remains locked up. Then the genetic test was done and suddenly the results were much more politically correct. The skeleton was given to the tribal confederation and buried in secret by the tribes. The site where the body was discovered was buried and made inaccessable for future study. Before the remains were given to the tribes, a few small bones went missing.
Interesting information and yet very sad!
Wherever the government’s involved, believe nothing you hear and half of what you see
Yep. I was living in the area at the time. Stories were in the news on a nearly daily basis. Here's another one: K-man was thought, by some, to be a member of one of the lost tribes of Israel. And was murdered by locals 9,000 years ago. (Arrow in the back) Corps of Army Engineers realized they had been handed a potential hornet's nest. They blocked research for a long while then handed over the human remains to tribal elders who had been pressuring everyone--using guilt (naturally). Meanwhile the CofAE destroyed the site, hoping that would calm down the elders. It didn't. They demanded the human remains under NGPRA. They then claimed the remains to be those of a mythic ancestor. See story of Pahto and Wy'east--two brothers who had a falling out, one may have been murdered by the other. (Uh oh. This sounds a bit like Shem and Ham, but let's not go there.) Anyway, the father turned the two boys (?) into volcanoes. Tribal elders conducted ceremonies and re-buried the remains... somewhere. PS NAGPRA has already claimed tons of valuable stuff that could shed light on the earliest inhabitants of the Americas, aka. The New World.
@davemiller6055, LOL! “Those of us with special secret decoder rings know all the baseless conspiracies that have long been settled as untrue by the DNA evidence”. Thanks for the laugh though 😂
Jfc, you're not even trying to hide your BS. 😂 I'm also from the area and your spewing the white supremacist propaganda group the Asatru Folk Assembly, which really says a lot about you. DNA proves who he is and who his people are.
A correction, Chatters called the skeleton "caucasoid", a morphological term, NOT causcasian, the confusion ever since, he never implied it was Caucasian & took endless garbage for it.
Fwiw 📚
My haplogroup is R1a. Im a russian. My best friends haplpgroup is Q-M3. Hes a mexican. From opposite corners of the world, yet close relatives by paternal lineage.
@BOM_NLDthe Q haplogroup is Anatolian neolitic?
@BOM_NLDOldest R haplogroup found around Baikal region and belongs to Ma’lta boy the Ancient North Eurasian.
Remember That Q is and was also present all over Eurasia, independent of migrations into the Americas.
@BOM_NLD They come from the same source. Some DNA Test results will show Q and R to be very similar. South East asian in origin.
The high percentage of Central and South American populations help prove my contention that the earliest humans to reach the Americas came by boat and settled the more southerly portions first
If their travels were 20000 years ago or more America was covered with an ice sheet down to Kentucky.
@@leonardcollings7389 Only the Columbia river area on the West Coast. But the Antarctic ice cap was also larger and many currently submerged islands were above water allowing multiple routes for Australo-Asian peoles to reach S America
@@Jagdtyger2ABy boat, how? Is it with the help of ancient aliens
Facial features or phenotypes are not always related to genetics.
We can find many indigenous Americans with sharp noses that look like Caucasoid features.
A Japanese actor, Hiroshi Abe, also looks like mixed Caucasoid. Yet he's from some native Ainu origin.
Native Americans, Ainus and Europeans share a common ancestor - Ancient North Eurasians - who lived about 20,000 years ago in Siberia and had Caucasian features. Some migrated westward and mixed with populations from Europe, the Caucasus, and the Middle East to form today's Europeans, others migrated eastward, mixed with East Asian Mongoloid populations, and then settled the American continent and the Japanese islands. Native Americans today have two-thirds East Asian ancestry and one-third Ancient North Eurasian ancestry.
Fascial characteristics or phenotype are also connected with geographic terrain configuration, environment and climate. Species with different genetics can sometimes develope similar look when they live in similar habitat.
Genetic divergence/convergence.
@@davids5126
The ancestors of the Caucasoid are the Iberomaurs and Natufians (both cultures are relatives), and after the transition to agriculture, the signs of Caucasoid intensified
@@Scythian_nomad If you think about "European Caucasians", their ancestors are mostly Early European (Anatolian) Farmers - which most probably partly derived from Natufian Culture, than WHG/EHG/CHG and Western Steppe Yamna people (Indo - Europeans). If you thought about North Africans or specifically Tunisians, Algerians and Morrocans, they as a "Caucasoid race" derived from Iberomarusians that most probably were autochtonous in North Africa. There are some other theories that they may have came from Middle East or Europe which I personally do not believe.
One thing I can conclude from this, seeing all the links to populations all over the world, is…..that we are all connected, related, if we go far enough back.
Same is true for all life on Earth.
Yep we are all cousins
We are all cousins
The anthropologist from the '90 that has seen the head was amazed at how European his facial features are, how different was from an Asian or from an African head.
There may have been some confirmation bias at play. Still, Asians, Native Americans, and so called Caucasians aren’t all that physically distinct from each other, or not as distinct from each other as they are from sub Saharan Africans and Melanesians. So confusing their skeletal remains is understandable.
@@KathyPrendergast-cu5ci no, is just basic physical anthropology, the cranium of the EUROPEAN IS SLENDER, LONG, SLIM, the head of the Asiatic rests on his chick bones, because are wide; while the head of the African has a wide nose; the researchers first thought that the head was modern, of a pioneer from the 19th century. But the matter was politically charged, so the head was buried under sand by the US military, the tribes were angry that their claim to being in the Americas first were challenged.
They were wrong. Genetics say otherwise. Did you even bother watching the video? If you did watch, you sure have deep comprehension problems.
@@zagortenay33 the genetics are manipulated
@paulpaustovanu8816, Your brain and logic capabilities have been manipulated.
Wow great idea to adding speaker voice in your video 👍
I was thinking about this few hours ago
And this video popped up 😊
Interesting video! According to Gedmatch, some of my DNA matches Kennewick Man. I do have Asian, Amerindian, Papuan, Arctic, and other populations.
You sound like me. I carry Kennewick Man's DNA. I even carry some Inuit (Greenlandic), along with Polynesia (Via Bot15 and17) and Clovis. In addition have some Amerindian, N. African, Oceanian, NE Asian, and Ust'Ishim
@@harrietharlow9929 I also match Ust'Ishim, Greenland Eskimo, NE Asian, and Clovis too! This is so interesting!
@@crystalbishop6971 It truly is. My archaic DNA is definitely like nothing I ever expected!
That makes sense. I'm from Brazil Amazon, if I had full beard, I would look more like him haha
the answer to how Europeans arrived in the Americas is provided by the late Stanford professor in his book, whose title is, if I am not mistaken, something like ''Across the Atlantic ice''
It's so crazy that these ancient people have so many mixes from all over the world.
Agreed, humanity got around at an early age!
Yes, they did get around. Even cross specie was probably a given. It just depended on opportunity.
@@josmotherman591 since Kennewick man lived less than 10,000 years ago, he didn't mix with any other human species. The last human species to live at the same time as homosapiens were Neanderthals. They went extinct 40,000 years ago.
Ainu is pronounced “eye-new” w/o accent.
Just like "Egyptology", any "Native American" discovery MUST & WILL, be made to fit the "Established Narrative", no matter what.
I think think final picture will be a lot more complicated than the "established narrative" would like us to know.
Slow trickle of propaganda
Asians and Caucasians share an ancestor, they come from a further genetic line, so Kennewick is probably from that further up line.......
the reconstructed head looks nothing like a Asian or African, but like a European
Nope.
Like a North Atlantic Native American phenotype.
Think like how Russell Means looks .
Why weren't an Amazonian tribe of people or the Inuit or the Polynesian people asked for their input into how the remains ought to be respected? Also, since this individual was alive nine millennium ago, was any effort made to research how his people would have treated his burial? Deciding he would be treated with the current belief patterns of a people removed from him by nine thousand year's ago is senseless - may as well have him interred in a Baptist cemetery or have the last rights said over him - both would have meant just as much to the individual while he was alive - nothing.
I know if I were to treat someone maybe possibly but probably not in my own ancestral lineage from nine thousand years back to a current day funeral right - I'd be getting everything about what they believed and held dear irrevocably wrong.
I understand some of the unimaginable wrong done to the current Native American populations and the first peoples of the Americas and very much agree with wanting to redress ugly wrongs, , but maybe give them back valuable land and make sure they have a voice in the current government and equal opportunities to decide for themselves now what they want to contribute to their county - rather than this patched up business of handing back nine thousand year old remains which have a one in a hundred million chance of having any connection to their own heritage. It just doesn't seem to make any sense.
Truth.
Why was the Colville Indian Reservation chosen to bury the bones when the Yakima Indian Reservation was closer to Kennewick?
Interesting as he is only 16%so called native American.
Looks like he should have been returned to Bolivia or perhaps Peru.
Ask the Colville and Yakama tribes for that information.
It was a confederation of tribes. Both the Collville and the Yakima live on the Columbia river. I'm guessing that the Collville rez was chosen because it's larger and more populated, but is also more remote and the burial site would be harder to access.
Because it's their ancestor.
I read an article about Kennewick man----and the remains were buried under tons of rubble, rocks, whatever so that the remains wouldn't be "disturbed" by researchers. The native Americans insisted on the burial of the remains so that no further studies could be done.
After all, the established narrative must be upheld at all costs.
America was a place where travelers, traders, settlers, sailors blown off course, exiles, and
many other peoples happened to "discover" in their travels. On the East Coast the Phoenicians might have been mining along the Great Lakes. Irish monks, Templars, Egyptians and even Romans might have joined the long stream of visitors and settlers to America. The Viking settlements in Canada provide clear evidence that the Vikings established a colony and were actively sailing along the American coastline----exactly how far south they made it is open to conjecture. On the West Coast various groups from across the Pacific found their way to American shores, along with Chinese seafarers and other groups in Asia and Micronesia. Some sought new lands to establish colonies while others were simply blown off course and may never have returned to their homelands.
Then, tribes from the Yucatan Peninsula also made their way north----when lack of water, large populations, food shortages, and invaders ravaged their native lands.
There's a lesson here: Like everyone else, the native Americans had to come from "somewhere." They just didn't spring up from the earth like magic mushrooms after a heavy rain. People were coming and going all along over the centuries-----some deciding the new lands were a good place to stay and establish a new life for themselves while others were here to hunt and fish----and they returned home to speak of a new land.
Not one researcher has THE definitive answer to who exactly came here and when.
As a result of these people's comings and goings, they infused local tribes with new blood, new customs and traditions, and new offspring that were a melting pot of countless
migratory adventures to the Americas. Who really knows what Kennewick man looked like? Everything is always conjecture----and today conjecture has to fit the established PC narrative. Otherwise, any findings contrary to what's expected and decreed must be false.
You just bury the findings under tons of rubble and hope for the best.
You seem way too butthurt about Native people. We were here for a long time. Focus on your European ancestors and stop trying to stupidly erase Native people. If there were Europeans floating all over the continents don't you think early European explorers would have written about it? They did not. Get over it.
This is true. North America has evidence of many ancient cultures involvement. As for the so called "indigenous people"...there were migrations into N. America from all directions. And all of them brought a diverse genetic signature. And as far as Kennewick man. His features could be accurately reconstructed from his skull. All that's lacking is the will. Peace.
Sounds like what you are saying is conjecture.
@@jesshighland7177 Read the article in Smithsonian magazine years ago. Check it out.
There is a clovis group that colonized practically all America at about at least 12,000 years from Beringia area,. They made this place their home for thousands of years and mostly thrived inventing things like corn and beans and squash and potatoes etc. It saved humanity. Though it wasn't perfection, it was a beautiful garden-like paradise they planned to maintain forever as evidenced in their myths. Our European ancestors came for need to survive from old world violence and diseases and greed and transformed this land rapidly. Thank your Native bretheren by acknowledging them and their existence.
It wouldn't have been too hard to show the actual stretch of river that the story unfolded on. Columbia park, Kennewick, Washington upstream of the hwy 395 bridge (Blue bridge).
It wouldn't have been nearly as scenic, the entire Gorge was theirs anyway so what does it matter?
All your videos remind me of our connections rather than our separations. One species.
One species but several subspecies.
@@leonardcollings7389 No. One species as in all humans are the same. We could not breed successfully if we were not.
@@evadd2 One species Homo Sapien but several subspecies. fossilized Neanderthal bones seem human-like. But a closer look reveals the characteristics that differentiate our ancient ancestors from modern Homo sapiens. Neanderthals looked similar to humans but had more prominent brows, protruding faces, and rib cages that were shorter, deeper, and wider. Yet still interbred
@@leonardcollings7389 And they no longer exist. The only known hominid species left is homo sapiens meaning one species. Thanks for playing, Sparky.
@@evadd2 And how do you explain Aboriginal peoples there is evidence that Aboriginal peoples carry some genes associated with the Denisovans (a species of human related to but distinct from Neanderthals) of Asia; the study suggests that there is an increase in allele sharing between the Denisovan and Aboriginal Australian genome
Nobody knows who were the first people anywhere until a second people arrives!
Very interesting!
How similar he is to the ancient North Jomon of Japan?
Randomly - I was at the races that year. Only year I’ve ever gone even though I grew up 40 mins from there..
3:50 Kenny be like: "I knew it!"
Native Americans are predominantly Mongoloid, but with some mixing, particularly with Austroloids. There were DNA evidence pointed to ancient populations in Central East Asia that are more closely related to modern Austroloid groups from South and Southeast Asia. This might also be a factor in the existence of a connection with the Ainus from North Japan. Recent studies also suggest that there was contact between the peoples of South America and Oceania. Particularly with the Polynesians, who are known for their long journeys on the sea. They are and were primarily Mongoloid, but like almost all Austronesian groups, also contain a small amount of austroloid DNA.
Edit:
I should have emphasized more that there was a cultural trade exchange between the people of Oceania and South America, not a migration pattern. The discovery of this trade exchange is quite recent, so of course the view of things may change. Also the Austronesians only began their migration south from Taiwan to the Pacific Ocean about 4000 years ago. So the contact between the Polynesians and the indigenous of South America is quite recent. It is still debatable and requires further research to determine if there were earlier migration routes and cultural exchanges between Oceania and South America.
Too bad the Mongoloid race is only 8,000 to 9,000 years old, after the Ice Age ended and after the Bering land bridge flooded. You should use the term pre or proto Mongoloid race. Also the term Austriod does not refer to South Asians or South East Asians. You are purposely deeiving people. Stop you clearly racism.
@@mrbaab5932Too bad there is already evidence that the Mongoloid and Caucasoid races are descended from one of the ancient Austroloid groups in Central Asia that separated about 40,000 years ago (but it could have happened later) and one migrated east and the other west. This also explains why Native Americans look like East and Southeast Asians. And I meant GROUPS from the Austroloid race living in South and Southeast Asia, as well as Oziania, not all ethnicities in those areas. You should learn to read properly.
@@I.I.I.A2
Arabs are somewhat similar to Austroloids
@@Scythian_nomad Ancient Arabian hunter-gatherers, not present-day Arabs. Most Arabs today belong to the Caucasian race.
Would not australoids be somewhat genetically proto west Eurasian?
Has anyone heard of research into the common female ancestor? According to this theory all humans came from a common female ancestor in Africa. In this theory, the Americas are populated with haplo groups A,B,C,D and X ( no mention of Q in the Americas, so it may be older than 2015). Haplo groups N and M are the ones that come out of Africa, with M going to Arabia and then East, and N going North trough Turkey to the Pontic Caspian Steppe. N becomes the European genes, while M becomes the Asian genes. Haplo groups A and X come from N, while B, C, D and Q come from M. Q only shows up in Papua New Guinea and Polynesia, while X comes from the Ural Mountains area in Northern Russia before going to North America. This might explain the confusion in the morphology of Kennewick man, since his ancestry appears to go back through both the European and Asian lines.
He was a good-looking man.
But was there any relationship to the Ainu and/or the Denesovians?
Of course there is, they all have that Asian but not too Asian looking eyes. Those native Americans (along with the blonde head Polynesians) were the one who suffered because they had bear, white, dark skin or red hair but with their Asian eyes, like ainus or Polynesians.
Europeans think that’s a Caucasian feature and they don’t realize that Koreans are paler than them
Ainu
Seljuk/Oghuz
Tarim basin
More xiongnu
Avar
More gokturk
Sintashta
Yenisey
Ancient americans with eurasia heritage
2.2% Chinese & Vietnamese. Nice. Most likely took the Coastal land routes.
yeah, i thought he was gonna be siberian, turko-mongol. i didn't expect chinese-viet lol
A complex social construct- yes this!
He was probably relative with my Korean distant ancestor!
One thing I wanna know is, much of what happened on his NO mongolian DNA remains a mystery to this very day! 😂😂😂
Ha-ha, you must be secretly crushing on us, that’s why everytime in your comments evocating Mongolians 😂
Tungusic(mongols)came from australia and souteast asian,not Siberian
Native American and Turkic are real Siberian peoples,R and Q haplogroup🔥💪
@@azizyigido
Are you stupid kiddo?
Haplogroup K → LT NO MS P
P → Q and R Your fucking Q and R were divided from P where it came from Souteast Asia.
There were Paleo-Siberians who had Haplogroup C and D, but Haplogroup N and O pushed them out of Siberian area later or mixed together.
As long as you're hairless and odorless, you're very close to Siberians.
Also, IQ over 100 in average! But, you're NOT?
@@azizyigidothe Aboriginals of Australia, came from Asia. The ancient DNA studies have been done and verified, they are from ASIA, Eurasia to be exact, so r the Negritos from the Philippines and the Natives of Papua New Guinea. DNA and new dating techniques, r really giving up lots of surprises with more to come!
What did you use to get the exact tribes?
Baiamonte? That was my maiden name!
@@lisabaltzer4190 really
Kennewick man is very interesting indeed. Shows evidence of Siberian, and indigenous American ancestry, with some European admixture.
He doesn't have European admixture. He was an ancient sample so probably has some sequencing oddities like low coverage or contamination. That may be why he's getting stuff like Scottish or Papuan in some of the calculators.
@@asdfasdf6271not quite. One idea is that Europeans and Native Americans share admixture from the same north central Siberian population (this video calls them ANE or something). So, Kenwick Man is no more European than Europeans are Native American, but they may share some ancestors.
@@robertlipka9541 I know that, but for Kennewick Man to score modern European or Papuan, he has to have additional European-like or Papuan-like ancestry compared to pure Natives like the Karitiana, which he doesn’t. He has the exact same ratio of East Asian and Ancient North Eurasian genes as other full blooded natives, and that is reflected in his myHeritage results and some of the other calculators but the ones that give him 10% Papuan or European or whatever are probably not suitable for ancient samples or low coverage samples or something.
@@asdfasdf6271 this exactly what I am saying to, ALL Native Americans acquired the same ANE (and by extension European like genes) ancestry. They ALL have this 🙂 The Papuan like ancestry I suspect would come from East Asia, these were native population in the area before current Asians arrived, for example look up Aeta in Philippines (THE Indigenous people of the Philippines), or Maniq of Thailand.
Gedmatch calculators are inaccurate and since they don’t have ANE reference component so it falls under “European”
WHY are you talking about Kennewick, and showing video of the Columbia Gorge that IS ALMOST 200 MILES WEST AND ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STATE FROM THERE?!?!?
It is the body of Captain Jean-Luc Picard, who had time travelled to the past and perished there.
Framing race as a social construct ignores that race is a statistical cluster of genes. There are many, many examples showing that race does indeed have a biological basis to it. There are also valid, meaningful ways to categorize human populations into different racial groups via Cluster Analysis and Principal Component Analysis.
The main problem is that the classic racial classification is made based on the phenotype, not the genotype, the main problem is that the phenotype is not always what it seems, and there are many examples. Phenotypic traits may be the result of convergent evolution and not necessarily the result of inherited traits. An example is the Ainu, for a long time anthropologists were a little confused, generating hypotheses that a Caucasoid population had immigrated to Japan, but their DNA is very East Eurasian, and their "Caucasian" phenotype was inherited from a population of Hunter Gatherers. with East Eurasian DNA, it has more affinity to the Australoids than to the Caucasians. Another example, Indigenous Australians are not genotypically Negroid, they are East Eurasian, but for a long time they were grouped with the Negroids of Sub-Saharan Africa.
Very sensible comment. People tend to throw out nuance in favour of political correctness and that harms us in the long run.
2:45 This Kennewick reconstruction looks definitely mongoloid, cheekbones, slanted eyes, skintone colour..
He had red hair and was over 6 feet tall when he died.
I met some Sioux people look 0:56 they are tall and have large Norse and high cheek bones.
Sioux people don't look like East Asian but a little more Central Asian.
Well duh, just Canada is the size of all Europe, do you expect them all to be the same looking. Or you keep thinking of Native Americans wondering naked in the freezing Canada and northern USA
@@diegolopez000 No No, this video itself is stating 0:56 look like a Patrick Stewart, European man. So that I am saying I witnessed Sioux men look like 0:56. So even though this video creator is saying 0:56 look like European but there are Native Americans look like 0:56. So Native American have more diversified looks.
@@amies2370 well duh, just brazil or Canada are the size of all Europe continent, millions of different cultures were in America, not just 100.
America is 3 continents with thousandths of civilizations. And over all America most of the bearded natives; comechingones, huarpes, those of coastal USA have the same Siberian Polynesian features like ainus.
What is the background music playing? It is excellent.
Day 8 of me asking for Ainu results.
While me asking for Tarim Mummies about 1 year
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisboratI can’t believe that is already almost one year passed since Decimali started doing his DNA videos
@@barguttobed yes sir
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisboratWait just one more year than Decimali finally decide to make Tarim mummies video😂
@@barguttobed I can imagine their 75% genes are from ANE populations so that means they are just Eurasian people with little Baikal Hg mix.
Their results would be almost like Uyghurs.
I live about 20 minutes from where your opening shot is👍
Please hazara dna test video
Kennewick man may actually fit in to the Book of Mormon story I've found
Did Y chromosome haplogroup Q and mtDNA haplogroup X come from ANE?
ANE: Maternal Haplogroup X. Paternal Haplogroup Q.
NEA: maternal haplogroups A,B,C,D. Paternal Haplogroup C.
The Kennewick man is not ANE, he is Native American ancestral and they are the result of the mixture of ANE with NEA, however he inherited from the paternal side as from the maternal side Haplogroups ANE.
@@hummingbirdofgumption3263 X is from the Middle East and Europe according to Haplogroup maps
I had my son tested why my heritage. All it tells me it's that he's 40.9% masóAmerican. It doesn't tell me the exact place though. Any tips on how to find out?
Baiamonte? That was my maiden name. This is a small world.
My family is not Italian or any type of Latin and we cannot figure out how we got the last name though. My father is Arab and Asian and I look more Asian than him. A DNA test on my father has not one drop of Italian in him, but it said he was 13% Spanish, so maybe that is how we got the last name Baiamonte.
@@lisabaltzer4190 where are you from?
@@lisabaltzer4190 have you tested with myheritage? Gedmatch?
@@giobaiamonte Originally, Chicago. But I was raised in Los Angeles and am now in Idaho.
I live in Kennewick
He was born with the name Patrick Stewart
Top 25 genetically(autsomally) closest *eurasian populations* to Kennewick.
(Unsurprisingly closest are Siberian Eskimo and natives Kamchatka groups, second are Sayan-Altai populations(Kizhi, Shor, Khakass, Tuvan etc) followed by Mongols(including Kalmyk, Buryat, Inner Mongolians), Kazakh&Kyrgyzs, Samoyedic(Nenets, Selkup), Ugric(Khanty)
Distance to: Kennewick
0.24007064 Eskimo_Sireniki
0.28944865 Chukchi
0.33338120 Itelmen
0.33947399 Koryak
0.37613803 Khakass
0.37648564 Shor
0.37771099 Teleut
0.37851025 Tubalar
0.38322657 Altai-Kizhi
0.38923040 Tuvinian
0.39020898 Mongol_Xinjiang
0.39285879 Kalmyk
0.39354180 Selkup_Taz
0.39410739 Mongolian
0.39448154 Mongol_Inner_Mongolia_(Outer_Mongolia_Profile)
0.39469302 Kyrgyz
0.39514619 Kazakh
0.39702396 Khamnegan_o
0.39736903 Mongol_Mongolia
0.39905481 Tofalar
0.39962236 Todzin
0.39974431 Khanty
0.40074391 Nenets_Tundra
0.40171115 Buryat
0.40194326 Nenets_Forest
@@mybiscuit4680Indigenous Americans descends from Ancient North East Asian group who mixed with Ancient North Eurasians. And contribution of first is bigger, that’s why Americas natives carry EDAR gene like other East Eurasian Mongoloids.
@@mybiscuit46801:40 It’s shown here, the source of East Eurasian ancestry among Native American is related to ancient and modern Amur river populations. And Mongols and proto-Mongolian Slab Grave culture share the same ANA(Ancient North East Asian) genetic profile with Amur river populations.
Very interesting
I have some indigenous native friends who live north of me, where I live here in Seattle.
I have asked them if they have ever gotten a DNA test.
They say that's it none of Anglo's business who they are.
I think they know.
Whenever I try to tell them the story that their first fossil evidence of existence here on North America is about 13,500 years, they get angry.
Once again...
They know.
But if they admit, the checks will stop coming.
The reservation will lose funding.
My cheap smokes will disappear.
So let's just agree to disagree.
@@TheErik249 The truth is very interesting, indeed
Peace.
I think it's weird to see it animated as you have. Maybe cool, but weird.
Very nice results 👍👌Completely Native American. Japanese and Chinese are confused parts of his Ameridinian ancestry.
I wonder why they wouldn't say Austronesians rather than Polynesians since the Polynesians are a newer stock branching out of the Austronesians 4,000 years ago from the Lapita people and Papuan then moved to colonize more islands further east. Kennewick Man is 9,000 years old, there's no way he would be related to Polynesians.
There it is, 1.2% Japanese. Ither than that, Kenewick man had ancestors from over half the world, Well America always was a genetic melting pot LOL. My neighbors on the Colville Confederate Tribes should be proud of such cosmopolitan ancestor
Uh on...I thought I was WAY past crushes but I think I have one on Kennewick Man.
5:35 Why I see Uyghurs in Every ancient samples?????
Chatters was not an archaeologist.
Curious about the music choices for North America....The Inuit region of Canada has throat singing which is very unique and Canada has singing unique too with drums and men singing....all very unique. Neither of these are used though?
The Inuit and the now extinct Ihalmiut are distinct from the other Indian tribes of the north. The Inuit lived on the sea coast and lived on whales, seals, walruses and other animals whereas the Ihalmiut lived inland and survived exclusively on the Caribou. The Ihalmiut were driven to extinction by the Canadian government in the 20th century. This tragic story is chronicled in Farley Mowat’s books, “ People of the Deer” and “ The Desperate People”.
I'm 28% native american but I don't look at all like a native american i look caucasoid although 28% isn't too much
When you people will learn that phenotype is not an equal with genotype. It's not so important how you look!!
@@dejantodorovski5222 I know
Let me guess the 72% is white, right?
@@dejantodorovski5222um I think they know that. They were just explaining their looks, not anybody else's.
I’m a little over 33 percent indigenous and I get confused all the time with Asian.
The music in the background was too much, I had to bail out without watching the entire video.
Please do some on Turish and Azeri people. PLEASE!
Indian ancestor
Look at them quick and ready to whitewash another skeleton SMH
@hummingbirdofgumption3263 Yea he didn't look like fuccing Professor X either but they were quick to make him look like THAT SMH.... nobody said anything about Sub-Saharan clown but stop making everyone a fuccing Neanderthal
Looks very First Nation with a beard.
Dodecad Globe 4 at the third column. %90 pima +9.77 Turkish.
İn the others mostly pima +Turkish İstanbul ör chuvash.
İt's a truth Xiongnu Luandi clan, the house of rulers have ANE anchestry and have haplogroup Q.
Respect to all native American, south American, inuit brothers
He's the basis of exclusively North Atlantic type Native American DNA. From 10,000 years ago.
Yes rebury our ancestor
How do people know how much he weighted?
By examining the bones. Bones give a good indication of the muscles attached to them and so with the size of the man + weight of bones + weight of muscle... Voilà.
I really like this. I have heard so many claim he was White. They said he was Western European.
Must have had a bicycle.
My paternal line traces back to Kennewick Man.
I score some Amerindian on all of my tests. It seems this component comes up where Basal out of Africa man is situated on my chromosomes. It seems this part of my DNA tells a story about when Eurasiens split of from the ancestors of native americans.
78.81% Amerindian. 100% handsome.
I've never met a Polynesian that looks like Patrick Stewart lol
AINU is pronounced (i-noo) not (a-noo).
Natives of the Americas had and have a beard?
Their ancestors yes, the current Native Americans have partially or completely lost this characteristic.
@@eltecnico9541whu?
Why?
Not all, but some can. Especially, tribes in Pacific Northwest Coast.
Some patagonian had it
He was an ancestor to the Coville Confederated Tribes. It’s already been confirmed.
He looks like Dan Haggerty.
I thought X was a European haplogroup.
He only looked like Patrick Stewart because he was shown as bald with a big nose. Put hair in his head and the resemblance disappears
Northern Native Americans are the closest!
NOT ONE genome on earth exhibits the so-called "race" marker. It is also FALSE STATEMENT to attribute "ethnicity or culture" to both genotype and phenotype. Bifurcation of The science of Anthropology into two fields including Physical Anthroplogy and Cultural Anthropology is purposeful in precluding false statement, such as wrongful assertions about "race and ethnicity" being the same. Additionally, words like aboriginal peoples, native Americans, Amer-indians, and so-called "first nation peoples" are all false statements when considering dates and varied origins of human migration into the Americas. So called "Indian" is false statement. The New World genome is NOT reflective of single source of DNA origins.
According to the bible all humans come form 1 pair of humans, 1 source, the smallest source imaginable. This hypothesis still is in the minds of today's anthropologists. Otherwise tehy would simply accept that humans and ancestors of humans migrated wherever they wanted, followed pray, searched for good food, better climate, ...
So why not getting rid of ideologies and turn to real science? Money!
Scientist do believe in a "genetic Adam" that most homosapiens derive from.
I'm 25 percent ANE, but that doesn't mean I'm Native American... right? So Kennewick Man is some way Eurasian
Living Europeans on average have 20% ANE, but Finn-Ugric peoples often have up to 30%. The Natives of North America own 30%, except the Inuit who have 18%, the Natives of Central America own 35%, the South Americans and Ket of Siberia own 40% of ANE. The record is held by the Andeans who have 45%. Short answer no, ANE DNA is ancient and has gone through a process of genetic drift, to this is added that the Native Americans have between 60% to 70% of DNA from the Ancient Northeast from Asia, a curious fact, this Asian DNA shows genetic affinity with the Japanese Indigenous People and the Jomon culture, due to the Dh4 lineage.
Most ANE DNA in Europeans derives from Eastern Hunter Gatherers or EHG (75% ANE +25% WHG), but some ANE DNA in Europeans also derives from Scandinavian Hunter Gatherers SHG (81% WHG +19% WHG). Then in Central Asia they have the Western Siberian Hunter Gatherers WSHG (80% ANE +20% Northeast Asia).
Native Indians migrated from Asia, so wouldn’t he technically be an Asian?
They come from Asia but it was from the remote past, they have a different gene pool than all the different modern Asian groups although they share certain similarities.
The genepool of North Asians ("Siberians") has changed since the Native Americans moved into the Americas. Native American DNA consists of two major components: Ancient (North)East Asian (most of the genome: ancestral to most East Asians) and Ancient North Eurasians (up to 40% of the genome). The second component is (to a lesser degree) also present in contemporary Europeans, whereas it's minor (or wholly absent) in most North Asians today.