Michael Keaton, Emma Stone, Edward Norton, and Zach Galifianakis on Birdman
Vložit
- čas přidán 14. 10. 2014
- There has never been a film quite like Birdman-a movie about theater, and a comedy about tragedy.
Subscribe now to 92Y Talks: bit.ly/1Iwj0wb
Star Michael Keaton sits down with moderator Annette Insdorf, along with the brilliant supporting cast-Edward Norton, Emma Stone, and Zach Galifianakis-to discuss the challenges of shooting the film's uncommonly long takes and examine the movie's themes of the price of fame.
Follow us on Facebook: / 92ndstreety
Twitter: / 92y
Tumblr: / 92y
I really wish there were more movies like Birdman.
This movie will be studied for years.
I've watched it now 5 times… every time I discover new shit
i feel bad for the interviewer because she's CLEARLY a case of reading way too much into things and the actors are like 'yeah no.'. Lmao.
Sorry, don't agree at all… she really understands Alejandro and Chivo… best interviewer I've seen
Shonaripa One of the best parts of this video was when she got all pretentious about watching "Night Shift", and Keaton gently mocked her for it.
A bit conflicted here on the topic of the interviewer... Yes she talks too much. But at least most of the questions are interesting, as opposed to the idiotic questions we have to listen to most of the times... For an example, listen to any film press conference- most people who write about movies are quite ignorant and silly, unfortunately.
teaber That is true, there are two sides of the same coin... however, things can be done in a way that meets both ends.
She could make all those questions without telling us her "life story", and how she knew x,y,z person, and talked previously with alpha, beta, gama directors, and teached here, and there... I do not condemn her overanalyses, that is quite expectable and interesting of a teacher of her kind... however, the audience are not her students... and the interviewed are not just the end of the Questions Book where the answers rely, where she is cheking them to be sure of the later questions she will ask to her students on the exam! (I bet she told her students to be there, watching the interview on the front row).
Long story short: Less pretentious would be nice; Four people came there to talk and the fifth spoke more than the rest, all together, who are suposedly the guests, thus, the point of focus. Bad interview, nice lesson, class dismissed!
Talks is cheap. LET the actors speak ! Maybe she is afraid to allow that to happen ?? Ego is often the problem....
edward norton is awesoome
Great interview.
It was just such an awesome film
Emma stones answer about her generation and social media was actually super interesting
Cool stuff
Intro music
I hate how everyone that talks about this movie wants to know "What was it like doing a movie that was all one continuous shot?" As if this was the first movie to ever do that. Has no one ever seen Children of Men? Plus there is so much more to this movie than just the fact it was one continuous shot. So much more that it's a waste of time to even bring it up.
+BackCountryBrdr everybody is super shocked on how challenging it was blabla, what i get from this is how spoiled actors are, that for this movie they actually had to memorize lines, they had to learn choreographies, etc. how the movie was shot is not why i loved the movie.
The most interesting person on this panel is madame Insdorf herself.
By far… Norton and Galifianakis made a few interesting comments… Keaton, while a great actor, has been intellectually disappointing
man i love Emma her smile never fails to brighten my day, she's my all time celeb crush, would marry her tomorrow if i could
40:30 "He (Alejandro Inarritu) is an equal oppurtunity offender", lolol. Michael Keaton is God.
Masterpiece movie
nice socks, michael!
He's wearing the same socks as Emma!
i thought this was an interview not a lecture where actors chime in every once in a while
The only interesting person is the interviewer and Edward Norton, the rest of the actors should've been asked if they liked the transformers movies?
the ego of this woman makes these interviews unwatchable. 13 minutes in and i have to bail.
Wow, this woman should not be an interviewer...She spends half the time talking about herself and the different famous people she's friends with or has interviewed, and her questions are not only generally much longer than the actors' answers, but they are all said in a way that is designed to show off her knowledge, and are so long-winded on whatever topic she's addressing that she ends up answering the question herself, leaving the actor with not much to say in response. What an atrocious interviewer - she is presumptuous, overly buddy-buddy as if they're her long time friends (referring to them talking backstage for a moment as if it was one of many deep discussions between them, when they'd only just met), constantly name dropping ("My friend Alejandro", of the director, and "When I interviewed Clive Owen.."), as well as referring to her prestigious position as a professor at Columbia frequently, as if to make sure that she's seen as on their level, and then finally, constantly asking questions that are overly "deep",and are reading meanings into everything, including things without meaning, just for the sake of coming across as intelligent and knowledgeable and "deeper" than other interviewers. By the end the whole thing comes off as one massive ego stroke, and the actors look so turned off, having withdrawn more and more throughout the interview, letting her talk because she certainly doesn't actually seem to want to listen to anyone's voice but her own.
oldmoviemusic She is on stage like she is in her classroom, that is the problem. Her posture is like she is lecturing the audience of the things they didn't get when saw the movie... while it is interesting to know some of that stuff, she is mainly satisfying her own curiosity to her point of interest... the questiong is: When will be the exam?
+oldmoviemusic "......long-winded ....... atrocious....... presumptuous..."
These are just labels.
Complaining about her being long winded then go on a 1,000 word essay....
omgosh, this is so pretentious. madame? masterpiece? no sense of humor, c'mon chill out.
55:10 LOL
cool… go watch your cartoons and game shows
This woman is the lord of pretentiousness
Nope… she knows what she is talking about
A bit conflicted here on the topic of the interviewer... Yes she talks too much. But at least most of the questions are interesting, as opposed to the idiotic questions we have to listen to most of the times... For an example, listen to any film press conference- most people who write about movies are quite ignorant and silly, unfortunately.
Completely agree with you