Nice explanation but I am not agree with your 2nd que. explanation because you are Making T->F by assuming a particular condition, not all possible condition
In first question, remaining three options are are also valid actually. Sir you haven't checked all the possibilities that is why you have got false. Sir please reply for my doubt.
not really important.....there may be many possibilities which are valid...but if one of the possibilities are false then the overall formula is invalid
Sir in the Universal generalization example P(x): raju passes physics exam but then how can we conclude that everyone passes physics exam V(x) P(x). with regards
didnt understood (∀x(α)⇒∀x(β))⇒∀x(α⇒β) as you took Raju to justify RHS i.e. for proving it wrong , On the other hand you took Rani in LHS to prove it True. But if we consider only Rani case then the whole eqn/formula including LHS and RHS becomes true there will be no False value in RHS as in the case of Rani α is false thereafter if we consider the same assumption on RHS , it will be TRUE as LHS? can someone explain as I think i'm missing some point
Rani can never pass Chemistry. Still Raju likes her
don't know to thank you. Incredibly superb. No one can teach logic like u..
Sir your teaching techniques are amazing... Thank you so much for these videos..
Sir, you are really superb. Can't express my feelings in words, it's something like i discovered something new even after knowing all concepts.
Wowwww......best video I ever watched for logic..superb sir...keep going 👍👍
...
Thanks a lot Sir....
This is the best video available for this subject.
It helped me a lot !!!
sir u r really awesome..u tech clear cut concepts..thankyou so much sr..
Thanku sir after wathing this video i get better understanding of first order logic..
Best video for first ordered logic✔
thanku so much sir ,,by seeing these useful video i solve all pyq sir thanks once again
Thank you sir
For your high quality gate lectures
Thank you so much sir for this awesome vdo it really helped me a lot😊
Right to the Point.
Well explained:)
excellent
GREAT SIR heartily Saluate
Thank you so much sir 🙏🙏🙏
ITs superb. Thanks a lot.
Excellent explanation. But how to infer for two place predicate
thanks sir....
Thank you so much .
Thank you so much
So good
Nice explanation but I am not agree with your 2nd que. explanation because you are Making T->F by assuming a particular condition, not all possible condition
sir please upload videos on groups
Thank u so much sir .....
In first question, remaining three options are are also valid actually. Sir you haven't checked all the possibilities that is why you have got false. Sir please reply for my doubt.
not really important.....there may be many possibilities which are valid...but if one of the possibilities are false then the overall formula is invalid
Sir in second example c option there should be for all X needd to be alfha not beta
Sir in the Universal generalization example P(x): raju passes physics exam
but then how can we conclude that everyone passes physics exam V(x) P(x).
with regards
If Raju passes physics then someone will be going pass physics not everyone.
Is this full syllabus for gate exam sir ??? Please reply ???
sir , please mention lecture number. so, we can watch them in sequence. With regards
Go to playlists.
czcams.com/play/PLsFENPUZBqioyqffh3YZ2pKUg4uZFQJUY.html
GATE CS LECTURES BY GATE BOOK thanku sir
Sir, in example C 16:02 I think the correct answer should be invalid.
No Bhai, example C is valid. Sir has done it correctly.
didnt understood (∀x(α)⇒∀x(β))⇒∀x(α⇒β) as you took Raju to justify RHS i.e. for proving it wrong , On the other hand you took Rani in LHS to prove it True. But if we consider only Rani case then the whole eqn/formula including LHS and RHS becomes true there will be no False value in RHS as in the case of Rani α is false thereafter if we consider the same assumption on RHS , it will be TRUE as LHS? can someone explain as I think i'm missing some point