Very well explained guruji. Sanatan dharma is still in existence only by gigantic karmayog and deepest Gyanyog of acharya adi shankar in only 32 years of his short but exuberant lifespan. Acharya kumaril bhatta have also sacrifice his whole life for re establishment of Sanatan dharma which was at verge of extinction in the peak of popularity of buddhism in India.
@@gaurav9607 mitra. Brahm aur brahma mein antar hota hota hai... Baki Jo aapne kaha sahi kaha..santaan parampara hamare param pita parmeshwar ka naam ka Sachidanand hai jo ek hi hain...aur unka mul swaroop nirgun niraakaar hai. Wahi ishwar apne ko panch kritya karyon ke nispadan ke liye apne ko 5 rup mein vyakt karte hain. Nirmaan ke samya unhi ka naam brahma ya surya hota hai.. Palan ke samay vishnu, samhaar ke samay rudra anuragh ke samay ganpati aur vigrah ya anudhan ke samay bhagwati... Ye panch dev panch tatvaon ke bhi tatva hain..
Surya kaun hai iss par vichar karein. Sour siddhant mein hyranyagarbha ko surya kaha jata hai aur hyranyagarbha swayam brahma ji se hai kyuke brahmaji hi aadi prajapati hain. Surya aur brahma ko interchangably use karte hai sour siddhant mein kyuke brahma ki hai tarah surya bhi sabko jeevan dene wale hyranyagarbha sidh hote hai. Scientifically bhi prithvi par jo Jeevan hai veh surya se hai aur swayam surya ka jeevan brahmaji arthat hyranyagarbha se hai.
Please don’t use the word “mythology “ . Mythology is western construct. Bhaaratiya Knowledge Traditions emanated from Experiential Realization which is observable, measurable, teachable, replicable, and transferable as a “lived reality “. Its a Science of Human Consciousness. Thank you!
क्योंकि आपके मन में जो है वह आपके लिए सकार परंतु मेरे लिए निराकार है.... क्योंकि आपके मन में कौन से प्रभु है यह मैं नहीं देख सकता इसलिए मेरे लिए वह निराकार है परंतु आप अपने प्रभु को जान सकते हैं इसलिए आपके लिए वह साकार हैं यही सूत्र है
Guru ji se ye jana tha me unka ek chota sa Bhagat hu bhakti krne ke liye kon sa marag sahi hai agar bhagwan ki bhakti krni hai to kaise uspar dhayan kandrit kra jaye me mahadev ka bhakt hu me dhayan lagta hu to hat jata hai dhayan please batnane ki kirpa kre
I don't know why these people say like Advaita is not for normal people. I know Advaita but even if given choice of life and death still I will choose to path of Hari nam sankirtan which is the yuga dharma of this kaliyuga. I am not against Advaita philosophy but love of God is much more difficult to attain then to understand this philosophy of Advaita
Your comment simply reflects your subtle hatred towards Advaita-Vedanta. Plus, if you think just by doing Hari naam japa you can please Sri Hari then you are living in fools paradise. Also, your claim that Hari naam is the only yuga dharma of this Kaliyuga is baseless. I can refute this easily by giving shastra pramanas from even Vaishnav Purans mind you. If you wish to do Hari naam please go ahead and do so, but dont misguide people by saying that this is the ONLY way. This just reflects your superior attitude, which is a clear sign of Rajas and Tamas. Just by worshipping Sri Hari one doesn't become Sattvik.
Yes god is there and we should pray In purans the stories are symbolic to make us understand the concepts of vedas But the forms of God in purana are not just symbolic they are sagun form of god God is formless and everything has been created from formless God But just think that If God has created this saakar world can he not take saakar form Definitely God can take saakar form just like he created this saakar world So god is both niraakaar as well as sakaar And sometimes god communicates to devotees through saakar form
those who can see nirguna in saguna and saguna in nirguna are actual having of Gyan. to approach as nirguna or saguna is matter of one's choice developed by his nature based on combination of 3 guns. it is not about one's ability to understand advita. later very well known Acharyas were equally able to understand or to more dig into advait vedanta. many saguna upasak saints were even better capable to understand advaita but they equally celebrated swaroop bakkti and bhajan as they became able to overcome such nirgun sagun difference and enjoyed sagun approach. like Guru nanak, sant raidas , maharastra saint tradition...etc
यदि बौद्ध धर्म का khandan na किया होता तो समूचे भारत का वही हाल होता जो आज अफगानिस्तान का h . लद्दाख को देख लो bodhism कश्मीर में भी था . इस्लाम ने बौद्धों को आसानी से कत्ल कर दिया और इस्लामिक गिरोह बना दिए . यानि कि बौद्धों ने ladna छोड़ दिया . संस्कृति को बचाने के लिए युद्ध आवश्यक है . जो आज भी चल रहा है . हिंसा या युद्ध अभ्यास aavashyak h. समाज को सिर्फ त्याग नहीं चाहिये
Buddhism ek atheist philosophy hai, jo vedon ko nhi mante, atma ko nhi mante, srilanka-burma-bhutan me hazaro, lakho hinduon ko khtm kiya tha inhone. Hamare hazaro mandiron ko toda, hamare mandiron par kabja kiya. Afghanistan me hinduon ko inn cchhhudo ne religious difference hone ke karan mar diya tha afghanistan me hamare shiv ling ko inn buddho ne toda. History me milta hai ye puja ke samay shivling par apna pair rakhte the to demean bhagwaan shiv. Fir bhi kuch gadhe log inn bewakoof ko sanatan dharm ka aur apna bhai bana kar ghum rahe hai..
I have a doubt, isn't Sagun Brahman also Advaita. If Atman be Non-dual with Brahman then what does it matter if it's Nirgun or Sagun, because that would also mean that Sankaracarya admitted duality which is not the case. I think Advaita is independent of whether attributes to Brahman are admitted or not. Kindly clarify.
@यशवीर सिंह नेगीadvait have only one truth , how you make it 3 , or from where maya come , only one brahmn exist, how maya cover or break brahmn in many parts like many souls , you said only one soul one brhm , if your read 2 chapter of geeta ,you will understand same quality of soul and super soul but there is a difference between quantity , and shankracharya accept waves comes from ocean ,ocean doesn't come from waves , from brahmn world appear not from world brahmn appear
But if Sri Adi Shankaracharya had philosophically defeated the so called Buddhist during his time then why did he declare that Budhha is the ninth incarnation of Vishnu.....this fact essentially nullifies the argument that he defeated Budhha....whereas the histrory is replete with instances that budhist were very cruelly killed/ murdered and their philosophical, intellectual...social & all kinds of other heritages were destroyed by the haters....whereas The Budhha had purely propagated humanism, compassion...nonviolence...love....peaceful coexistence of entitre humanity.... then ...why at all this kind of budhist genocide was perpetrated at that time is not understandable ....whereas the fact remains that there isn't even an iota of defect of any kind in his teachings....and unfortunately the vilification is still on ........and if at all Buddha's teachings were in any respect faulty...then why his ideas spread so far & wide outside....is again a puzzle......but I'm pretty sure that essential Buddhism i. e. His teachings can never be nullified by any logic....he...the Buddha continues to reside in the hearts of every rational humanbeing the world over.......his teachings are not mere philosophy...but are an experienced truths....just try it yourself.....The Budhha never had & even now his teachings can have any enemies.....he is there with his Hinyana & Mahayana to take every soul to Nirvana....to unshackle each soul from the Dukhha.
I feel Hinduism is full of hypocrisy . Ramayan Mahabharat is full of war greed, womanisers, bramha marrying own daughter, Indra cheater. Rishis having affairs. Otherside worship all beings
He was not against buddha and Buddhists at all, yes Buddha is considered the ninth avatar as well. For that, you first must know the meaning of the reincarnation of Vishnu, the quality of buddha that you have written is itself a reason to call him a reincarnation. The main aim of Adi Shankaracharya ji was to re-establish the Vedant for the revival of Hinduism again as the people due to the complexity of Hinduism people were going away from Vedant and Gita as Hindu, which was ultimately leading to the spreading of Buddhism. There is no difference between Vedant and buddha's teaching. But Buddhist philosophers had gone so far to deny the permanent Self, which was totally against the Vedant. So Adi Shankaracharya revived the knowledge of those scriptures again and proves that the Self is Not an individual to person but a one and only reality of existence as Brahman which was what the Upnishads were saying since many centuries ago. If we go scientifically then it is said that Nothing can come out from nothing. And with the revival of this knowledge Adi Shankaracharya put the questions in front of the Buddhist that no one could deny and that became the reason for revival of Hinduism. For the life Buddha may be enough but Shankaracharya's philosophy makes it complete. Both Vedant and Buddha are correct in their own way and not contradicting, buddha says duality does not exist that is important to come out of suffering But Vedant says duality seems to exist only because there is underlying reality that is nondual. Buddha denies soul but you have written soul in your comment, you have not understood buddha as well.😏
Guruji mera sawal isi se related he ki budh ko bhi Vishnu ka avtar btaya gya he to fir agr log bodh dharam me ja bhi rahe the to unhe bachane ka sawal kaha se aaya.
Mera ek sawal hai. Rachne wale ne Char achar tatha panch bhoot wali srishti rachi. Usne manav bhi racha. Vibhinn sanskritiyon mein manav jeewan ki mahima varnit hai. Maine ved nahin padhe. Mai or mere aas pass jo bhi jeewant cheejen hain, kya unke dwara main apne yani sabke rachyita ko jaan sakta hoon ? Guruji, aap ki deeragh or swasth aayu ki kaamna karta hua aapse uttar ka abhilashu hoon.
#sir pandokhar Dham ka youtube channel hai, aur us Dham pr news 18 India ki team bhi gyi lekin Kuch pta nhi lga paya ,plz aap bhi reaserch kre aur hme btaye
Mere prashan hai jab shiri Krishan g kehte hai Gita main k atma amar hai .... Use koi maar nhi skata kaat nhi skata jala nhi skata .. To fir garud puraan m kyu likha hi k marane k baad atama ko narak ya swaag l jaya jata h yam or unke duton k dwara .... Jesa wo admi karam karata h.... Use vesa Dand milta hi.... Jese k use kholte tail M tala jata h... Ya use jalti aag m fek dia jata hi... Us pr khode mare jate h...y sab kese ho skata hai.... And dusra prashan y hai k....sab jab bhram h hai....to hame shiv k aad shakti k...ya anay Devi devtao k pujaa Karan murti puja krana kyu jroori hai.... Kya shiv or aadi shakti h bharam hai.....unki poja Karana bhakti karna bhram k Pooja or bhakti hai.... Jabki gurbani m bhi likha h....shuru m h k ek om kaar sat naam karta purk .... Ek h naam hai jo sacha h.....usi ko pujo usi ko jaano ..... Guru g main maa kaali or bhagvaan shiv ko pujta hu ..... Kya m inki Pooja kr k bhram ko or atama ko jaan skata hu .... Name navneet From Punjab Khanna
"Sab brahma hai" Advait ka ye siddhant samajhne ke liye advait ke deep me jana hota hai jaise yaha ye keh rahe hai ki aam admi ke liye advait jeev-brahma ek samajhna impossible hai. Uske liye advait siddhant ko samajhna hoga... Jeev ko apne sarir ke saath brahma kabhi nhi kaha gya.
Ji brahma ke sagun sakar rup me advait ke hisab se 5devta hai shiv-devi-narayan-ganesh-surya aap inme se kisi ko apna isht maniye aur baki 4devta ko unka pratiaang.mtlb jitna apne isht ki respect krte hai utna hi baki 4devtaon ka bhi.5devta ek saman hi hai
One thing i couldnt understand Budda teachings are eternal n absolute truth so how it cud contradict n where it contradicted Hinduism. Buddha is considered as latest incarnation of Lord Vishnu den why adi Shankaracharya opposed buddha. It seems fight of philosophy not abt dharma. Buddha teachings are superior n more logical and modern so it cud be a reason.
Why can't you think that Buddhists Philosophy can be taken from Vedas , because most of his methods and philosophies are related to advait vedant which is 4000 years old
@@bauddhbhaarat5943 Buddha ko to respect waise bhi diya hi hai sabhi ne, aur nahi buddha ko kisine deny kia hai. Aur phle ye bhi jaan lo Buddha ne jis tarike se teachings di hai, Sankhya philosophy hi uska ek aadhar hai, jis tarike se Sankhya evolution k through existence ko samjhata hai waise hi buddha ne bhi bataya fir bhi dono same nahi hai. Aur to Aur buddha k kai shuruati teachers khud Sankhya scholars the. Iska matlab Buddha ki teachings Sankhya se li gayi hai. Kehne wale to ye bhi kh sakte hain. Aur to aur Nagarjun ki bhi baten Upnishads ki language se milti hain kyunki wo khud brahman the to unhone upnishad to padhe hi honge. Cheejon me jara antar karna seekho dusro ki suni sunai baten mt bolo kahin bhi.
@@deepaksinghrawat5246 बेटा थोड़ा शोध करो बोलने से पहले। तथागत बुद्ध की पूरी दृष्टी उपनिषदों और वेदों की विरोधी है। बुद्ध ने आत्मा के सिद्धांत और वर्ण व्यवस्था का डंका थोक के खंडन किया है। सारे बाद के आधारभूत ग्रन्थ , पतंजलि, गीता इत्यादि ने बुद्ध से ऋण लिया है। आत्मा और वर्ण व्यवस्था के सिवाय सनातन धर्म में है क्या केवल अन्धविश्वास बचा।
I was big fan of shankracharya but when I SAW shankracharya caste system and female dominance then I started feeling less connected to his teaching.I was like he followed same hindusim even having so much gyan
Bhai aap ek kaam karo tino ki philosophy ke basics ko suno uske baad vichar kro agar apko Bhagwan ke kisi bhi ruup ke prati bhakti bhav hai aur aap ma power hai apne apko surrender karne ka Bhagwan ko taab aap dvait vaad palan kijye
@@lakshmisharma2243 bhai wo apke upar depend karta hai agar aap ma Bhagwan ko serrander karne ka bhaw hai taab aap bhakti (dvaita) ko follow karo agar aap sochte ho Logic lagate ya agar bhagwan ko gyan dwara(scriptures) janana hai taab aap Advait follow karo , agar aap hinduism ko follow karna chahte ho science ke piche maat bhago
Esa kuch nhi hai bhudh ne keval ek shyaam padhti di vipasana or anapan satyog par shiv ne 112 vidhiya di or bhakti yog to en sabse bodho ki ati ahinsavaadi soch k karan desh gulam hua jiska samna sanatani kashatriyo ne kiya
कुमारिल भट्ट और आदि शंकराचार्य नै्ए बौद्धों को ए्ऐसा हराया कि आज तक खड़े नहीं हो पाए और नवबौद्ध का बौद्ध दर्शन से ही कुछ लेना देना असली बौद्ध महायान और हीनयान है बस बाकि सब नकली है
@@mayankagnihotri2780 मै इतिहास मे MA,SET,NET हू मुझे इतिहास थोडा समजता है इसलीये ये कपोलकल्पित कथा मत बताइये की,बौद्ध कीअहिंसा के कारण भारत गुलाम हूवा ये आपका मत पूर्वग्रहदूषित है दुनिया का इतिहास देख लिजीए सबसे बडे बडे सम्राट बौद्ध के हुवे फिर वो भारतीय सम्राट अशोक,कनिष्क,मिनादर,हर्षवर्धन,पाल वंश चीन का वंश हो,श्रीलंका का महानाम,तिस्स,अभय गामीनी,थायलंड का मिंग दो मिन,म्यानमार का अनवृथा,जपान का शोकोतो,मंगोल का खान वंश हो ये सब बौद्ध थे .बौद्ध की अहिंसा व्यवहारिक है इसलीये आपके तर्क पूर्वग्रहदूषित है और किसने कोणसी विद्या दि हो इतिहास साक्ष है
Advaita philosophy is older than you think and you can read it's Sutra in chandogya Upanishads which is 600 bc old Acharya Sankara just popularised this philosophy and nagarjuna gave sunyavad on 1-2 ad.
आत्मा नही मानने से तुम्हे खाना नाही मिलेगा क्या ? कुच्छ भी जरा जैनो को पूछो वोह भी बात देंगे कोई आत्मा नाही होगी हर तरफ माया ही होगी 😂 जो जैन बौध्द ने बतायी है 🙏
atma ko maths s smjana=adveet(2 nhi h) atma=energy(consious energy=jb tk humen body m hoti h,tb tk consiousely control kr skte h,baher jane p pta nhi) moksh=energy ka sorce of energy m milna(bcz her energy ka source hota h-jise m god khta hu) ab etne sare bodies(living-bactria,virus,animal,humen etc)m energy h,so 1 ni bol skte bt 2 ya 2 s jyda b ni bol skte,bcz source of energy ka khuch part her living ko mil ra h,esly actual m toh energy 1 hi h ab y energy jo jhad(non living)ko living bna dete h,y bus different type of energy h(universes m many types of emergy exist krti h,like food s milne vali,wave is also energy bcz energy/frequency/vibration ko hi wave khte h,jisme frequency&vibration only upkaran m mapne ka pemana/measurement h) sankrachary/kabir ke tym energy ka concept ni tha,klyug m jo atma ko dekh payega,vo use energy hi bolega,&energy ko describe ni kiya jata,use science ke through measure kiy h,fr us specific energy ka nam rakha jata h atoms ko b todne p quarks particle ate h,ultimately science b atom ko tod tod ke yhi p aygi ki these are different type of energy so sb mai god h,bcz sb living mai same type of energy/atma h,humen use consiousely control kr skta h(bcz mene kiy&heart s baher niklne s roka&mrte mrte bacha),bt dusre living use consiousely control ni kr skte
देश की हालत शंकर ने ही खराब कर रखी है 😂😂😂 बस उनको लगता है की उन्होंने देश बचाया है उसे ज्यादा खराब ही हुआ है आज कितने बौध्द देश मुस्लिम है कोई भी नहीं 😂😂😂 बस मुस्लिम का डर उन्हे हिंदू बना गया😂😂😂
यदि शंकराचार्य महाराज भारत को बौद्ध ही रहने देते तो शायद मानव की इतनी दुर्गति यहां न होती। सच्चाई छुप नहीं सकती बनावट के उसूलों से खुशबु आ नहीं सकती कागज़ के फूलों से।
@pushyamitra_shung_ शंकराचार्य महाराज के बाद से क्या उखाड़ लिया है तुम्हारे हिंदुत्व ने सिवाय बच्चे पालने और पानी पूरी बनाने और खाने के ? सब कुछ तो अफ़ग़ानियों या मुग़लों या अंग्रेज़ों ने बनाया है। यहां तक की स्वतन्त्र भारत का प्रतीक लाल किला मुग़लों ने बनाया , संसद अंग्रेज़ों ने बनाई। केवल बौद्ध ही भारत को स्थिर और मज़बूत शासन दे सके। अरबों के फैलाव को भी चीन ने ही रोका।
Agar chhhuddism ki koi aukat rehti tho bharat me ved nhi aate fir se. Aur waise bhi tumlog gaddar ho pushyamitr sunga Ke samay unaniyo se haath milaya tho tum chhhuddo ne.
Pranam ,vedo me gita me vyvharik ,dharmik ,vaigyanik , ye sab samahit hy tab kiyo sabhi hindu dharm ka virodh karta tha jabki hindu dharm samast manav kalyan ke liye hy.rajogun ,tamo gun ,satogun ,ye vykti visesh ke liye kaha gaya hy lekin ek vykti me ye sabhigun kabhi na kabhi prabhavi hota hy or karta hy.jaise Asakti ka na hona ,bhagvat puja ,satyachran ye satogun ,lobh asakati swarth ,ye rajogun tatha jis kriya me hinsa ,pramad ,moh use tamas samajhna chahiye ye gita me bhi hy or sahaj samajh sakte hy vidvan jan ,ab ye sabhi manav jivan me kabhi na kabhi hoga is se shayad koi vanchit rah sakta hy.
log confusion karte hain 2 chijon me. 1. Darshan 2. Marg. Darshan - dwait, adwait, dwaitadwait,, vishishthadwqit etc.... yeh darshan hain. philosophies - jo explanation dene ka prayas karti hai, jag, bhagwan ka swrup etc ka. 2. Marg - bhakti, yog, karma, dnyan - yeh route hai. toh aap adwait hokar bhakt ho sakte ho. adwaiti yogi ho sakte ho. usme koi problem nahi hai. adwait kehta hai. sab me - sab roopon me- ek hi bhagwan hai. sat chit anand hai. isiko mai ek roop me dekhkar usi sacchidqnand ko bhajra hun. ismi koi paradox nahi hai
Very well explained guruji. Sanatan dharma is still in existence only by gigantic karmayog and deepest Gyanyog of acharya adi shankar in only 32 years of his short but exuberant lifespan. Acharya kumaril bhatta have also sacrifice his whole life for re establishment of Sanatan dharma which was at verge of extinction in the peak of popularity of buddhism in India.
Guruji aap mahan hain itni asani se itni kathin baat samjha di 🙏
absolutely beautiful explanation.
thank you
Gurudev pranam Man of wisdom and Enlightenment personality
Guru shankarcharya ji ko koti koti pranam 🙏🙏
Naman Gurudev. Simple explanation to understand the depth of aduta vedenta.👏
सादर नमन गुरुजी ।।
पिछले 2 सालों से इस सवाल का जवाब ढूंढ रहा था मिल गया ।।🥰🙏
🙏🙏🙏✅👍👍👍 बहुत सुंदर और सटीक समझाया।
Gurudev ji ke shri charno main mera dandvat pranaam, jai shri ram om sai ram 💖🚩🙌🌹🙇♂️🧎♂️
Beautiful... gratitude Guruji 🙏
Dil bda khus hota h ki aaj ke daur me inko sunane wale kheir itne to bche h
Koti koti naman Sir ji. Today this episode cleared my thoughts on Advait
एक सुझाव - ब्रम्ह देव की उपासना पंचदेव मे नही होती - पंच देव मे गणेश जी, शिव जी, विष्णु जी, सूर्य जी और आदिशक्ति की उपासना की जाती है!
वेष्णव शेव शाक्त गणपत सूर्य
Aisa hai alp gyan bahut khtarnak hota hai.... Brahma ko hi surya kaha gya hai... Sastron mein
@@anmolabhishek3078 brham aatma ko kaha gya hai
Jo iss bhautik jagat se pare hai
@@gaurav9607 mitra. Brahm aur brahma mein antar hota hota hai... Baki Jo aapne kaha sahi kaha..santaan parampara hamare param pita parmeshwar ka naam ka Sachidanand hai jo ek hi hain...aur unka mul swaroop nirgun niraakaar hai. Wahi ishwar apne ko panch kritya karyon ke nispadan ke liye apne ko 5 rup mein vyakt karte hain. Nirmaan ke samya unhi ka naam brahma ya surya hota hai.. Palan ke samay vishnu, samhaar ke samay rudra anuragh ke samay ganpati aur vigrah ya anudhan ke samay bhagwati... Ye panch dev panch tatvaon ke bhi tatva hain..
Surya kaun hai iss par vichar karein. Sour siddhant mein hyranyagarbha ko surya kaha jata hai aur hyranyagarbha swayam brahma ji se hai kyuke brahmaji hi aadi prajapati hain.
Surya aur brahma ko interchangably use karte hai sour siddhant mein kyuke brahma ki hai tarah surya bhi sabko jeevan dene wale hyranyagarbha sidh hote hai. Scientifically bhi prithvi par jo Jeevan hai veh surya se hai aur swayam surya ka jeevan brahmaji arthat hyranyagarbha se hai.
ॐ नमो भगवते वासुदेवाय ❣️
Adi Shankaracharya motive was to re-establish BrahmanVaad in India as Due to Buddhism Dominance of Brahman was in danger.
Very true.
😂😂😂😂
I'm sure that you have not read any of his works specifically commentaries on any of the 'प्रस्थानत्रयी'.
@@Mramitparashar choro bhi bhimta hai wo buddhi chipti hai uski😂😂
@@godfather2078 😜
Jai ho guruji, Satya vachan, Dhanyavad...
Truly blessed to hear such wisdom coming from such amazing person. Thank u uncleji for simplying the mythology so nicely. 🙏🙏 dandavat pranam
Please don’t use the word “mythology “ . Mythology is western construct.
Bhaaratiya Knowledge Traditions emanated from Experiential Realization which is observable, measurable, teachable, replicable, and transferable as a “lived reality “. Its a Science of Human Consciousness. Thank you!
क्योंकि आपके मन में जो है वह आपके लिए सकार परंतु मेरे लिए निराकार है....
क्योंकि आपके मन में कौन से प्रभु है यह मैं नहीं देख सकता इसलिए मेरे लिए वह निराकार है परंतु आप अपने प्रभु को जान सकते हैं इसलिए आपके लिए वह साकार हैं
यही सूत्र है
wow great explanation....i had the same question for some time.
Thanks for saving Vedic Dharma. Jai shree adi Shankaracharya ❤🕉️
हरी 🕉️ तत्सत ❤️
Thanks to questioner & answerer
Shivoham shivoham 🙏🙏🙏
Paranm guru ji
Guru ji se ye jana tha me unka ek chota sa Bhagat hu bhakti krne ke liye kon sa marag sahi hai agar bhagwan ki bhakti krni hai to kaise uspar dhayan kandrit kra jaye me mahadev ka bhakt hu me dhayan lagta hu to hat jata hai dhayan please batnane ki kirpa kre
Very good explanation.
Sir very informative video, for me..
Today I understood three guna and it's relationship with Maya and how does it impact of behaviour of comman man.
आदरणीय गुरुजींना प्रणाम ❤
HAR HAR MAHADEV 🕉️🔱🕉️🔱🕉️🔱🕉️🔱🕉️🔱🕉️🔱🕉️🔱
Very very thanks 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
सत्सत प्रणाम गुरुजी । ब्रह्म और आत्मा में से कौन सीमित एवम श्रेष्ठ है 🙏🙏🙏
ब्रह्म आत्मा एक ही हैं
Thank you so much....i had same question for long
U r great guru ji
I don't know why these people say like Advaita is not for normal people. I know Advaita but even if given choice of life and death still I will choose to path of Hari nam sankirtan which is the yuga dharma of this kaliyuga. I am not against Advaita philosophy but love of God is much more difficult to attain then to understand this philosophy of Advaita
U r right bro, bhakti yog is far superior to gyan yog or yoga sadhna
No, there should be balance between all of them
@@VinayKumar-vv3bj bhai gyan marg bhi easy nhi hai gyan ko bhi realise karna hota hai Dyana ke dwara aur dhaya easy nhi hai
Your comment simply reflects your subtle hatred towards Advaita-Vedanta. Plus, if you think just by doing Hari naam japa you can please Sri Hari then you are living in fools paradise. Also, your claim that Hari naam is the only yuga dharma of this Kaliyuga is baseless. I can refute this easily by giving shastra pramanas from even Vaishnav Purans mind you. If you wish to do Hari naam please go ahead and do so, but dont misguide people by saying that this is the ONLY way. This just reflects your superior attitude, which is a clear sign of Rajas and Tamas. Just by worshipping Sri Hari one doesn't become Sattvik.
Guruji namaste as you said everything is symbolism in all Gods and purans, then acc to you is God there? Should we pray? Pls pls answer
Ritu
Yes god is there and we should pray
In purans the stories are symbolic to make us understand the concepts of vedas
But the forms of God in purana are not just symbolic they are sagun form of god
God is formless and everything has been created from formless God
But just think that
If God has created this saakar world can he not take saakar form
Definitely God can take saakar form just like he created this saakar world
So god is both niraakaar as well as sakaar
And sometimes god communicates to devotees through saakar form
Pyare guruji❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
All right
सूर्य (हिरण्यगर्भ ब्रह्मा), गणेश, शिव,शक्ति, श्रीविष्णु (राम + श्रीकृष्ण) ये पांच देव बताये हैं -----आपने शक्ति का वर्णन नहीं किया है 🙏
those who can see nirguna in saguna and saguna in nirguna are actual having of Gyan.
to approach as nirguna or saguna is matter of one's choice developed by his nature based on combination of 3 guns. it is not about one's ability to understand advita. later very well known Acharyas were equally able to understand or to more dig into advait vedanta.
many saguna upasak saints were even better capable to understand advaita but they equally celebrated swaroop bakkti and bhajan as they became able to overcome such nirgun sagun difference and enjoyed sagun approach. like Guru nanak, sant raidas , maharastra saint tradition...etc
Aap guru dev ke bare me or bi bataye
बौद्ध धर्म का क्यों खंडन किया शंकराचार्य जी ने
यदि बौद्ध धर्म का khandan na किया होता तो समूचे भारत का वही हाल होता जो आज अफगानिस्तान का h . लद्दाख को देख लो bodhism कश्मीर में भी था . इस्लाम ने बौद्धों को आसानी से कत्ल कर दिया और इस्लामिक गिरोह बना दिए . यानि कि बौद्धों ने ladna छोड़ दिया . संस्कृति को बचाने के लिए युद्ध आवश्यक है . जो आज भी चल रहा है . हिंसा या युद्ध अभ्यास aavashyak h. समाज को सिर्फ त्याग नहीं चाहिये
अहंकार।
अपने गुट की धौंस चलानी थी।
Buddhism ek atheist philosophy hai, jo vedon ko nhi mante, atma ko nhi mante, srilanka-burma-bhutan me hazaro, lakho hinduon ko khtm kiya tha inhone. Hamare hazaro mandiron ko toda, hamare mandiron par kabja kiya. Afghanistan me hinduon ko inn cchhhudo ne religious difference hone ke karan mar diya tha afghanistan me hamare shiv ling ko inn buddho ne toda. History me milta hai ye puja ke samay shivling par apna pair rakhte the to demean bhagwaan shiv. Fir bhi kuch gadhe log inn bewakoof ko sanatan dharm ka aur apna bhai bana kar ghum rahe hai..
@@godfather2078 kaha padha
Dhanyawad Guruji
Ye Query Mere Mind Me Bhi Thi. 👌
प्रकांड पंडित को नमन🙏🙏🙏
I have a doubt, isn't Sagun Brahman also Advaita. If Atman be Non-dual with Brahman then what does it matter if it's Nirgun or Sagun, because that would also mean that Sankaracarya admitted duality which is not the case. I think Advaita is independent of whether attributes to Brahman are admitted or not. Kindly clarify.
Sagun-Sakar + Nirgun-Nirakar = God= Shrikrishna
@यशवीर सिंह नेगीadvait have only one truth , how you make it 3 , or from where maya come , only one brahmn exist, how maya cover or break brahmn in many parts like many souls , you said only one soul one brhm , if your read 2 chapter of geeta ,you will understand same quality of soul and super soul but there is a difference between quantity , and shankracharya accept waves comes from ocean ,ocean doesn't come from waves , from brahmn world appear not from world brahmn appear
You are check sanatan dharm decoded
Pranam guruji 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🌹🌹
খুব সুন্দর ব্যাখ্যা করেছেন স্যার
Koti koti Pranam
But if Sri Adi Shankaracharya had philosophically defeated the so called Buddhist during his time then why did he declare that Budhha is the ninth incarnation of Vishnu.....this fact essentially nullifies the argument that he defeated Budhha....whereas the histrory is replete with instances that budhist were very cruelly killed/ murdered and their philosophical, intellectual...social & all kinds of other heritages were destroyed by the haters....whereas The Budhha had purely propagated humanism, compassion...nonviolence...love....peaceful coexistence of entitre humanity.... then ...why at all this kind of budhist genocide was perpetrated at that time is not understandable ....whereas the fact remains that there isn't even an iota of defect of any kind in his teachings....and unfortunately the vilification is still on ........and if at all Buddha's teachings were in any respect faulty...then why his ideas spread so far & wide outside....is again a puzzle......but I'm pretty sure that essential Buddhism i. e. His teachings can never be nullified by any logic....he...the Buddha continues to reside in the hearts of every rational humanbeing the world over.......his teachings are not mere philosophy...but are an experienced truths....just try it yourself.....The Budhha never had & even now his teachings can have any enemies.....he is there with his Hinyana & Mahayana to take every soul to Nirvana....to unshackle each soul from the Dukhha.
I feel Hinduism is full of hypocrisy . Ramayan Mahabharat is full of war greed, womanisers, bramha marrying own daughter, Indra cheater. Rishis having affairs. Otherside worship all beings
U hv well explained
He was not against buddha and Buddhists at all, yes Buddha is considered the ninth avatar as well. For that, you first must know the meaning of the reincarnation of Vishnu, the quality of buddha that you have written is itself a reason to call him a reincarnation. The main aim of Adi Shankaracharya ji was to re-establish the Vedant for the revival of Hinduism again as the people due to the complexity of Hinduism people were going away from Vedant and Gita as Hindu, which was ultimately leading to the spreading of Buddhism. There is no difference between Vedant and buddha's teaching. But Buddhist philosophers had gone so far to deny the permanent Self, which was totally against the Vedant. So Adi Shankaracharya revived the knowledge of those scriptures again and proves that the Self is Not an individual to person but a one and only reality of existence as Brahman which was what the Upnishads were saying since many centuries ago. If we go scientifically then it is said that Nothing can come out from nothing. And with the revival of this knowledge Adi Shankaracharya put the questions in front of the Buddhist that no one could deny and that became the reason for revival of Hinduism. For the life Buddha may be enough but Shankaracharya's philosophy makes it complete. Both Vedant and Buddha are correct in their own way and not contradicting, buddha says duality does not exist that is important to come out of suffering But Vedant says duality seems to exist only because there is underlying reality that is nondual.
Buddha denies soul but you have written soul in your comment, you have not understood buddha as well.😏
Gautam buddha is not 9th avatar.Buddha whom we vedic worship was born 50year after him.
Aisa hai sir. Jin budh ki baat unhono ki wo gautam nhi...
Very nice… Har Har Mahadev
Guruji mera sawal isi se related he ki budh ko bhi Vishnu ka avtar btaya gya he to fir agr log bodh dharam me ja bhi rahe the to unhe bachane ka sawal kaha se aaya.
प्रणाम गुरुजी🙏🙏चरण स्पर्श
Waah
🙏❤🙏
Pranammm
सुंदर और तर्कसंगत विवेचना
👏👏
Mera ek sawal hai. Rachne wale ne Char achar tatha panch bhoot wali srishti rachi. Usne manav bhi racha. Vibhinn sanskritiyon mein manav jeewan ki mahima varnit hai. Maine ved nahin padhe. Mai or mere aas pass jo bhi jeewant cheejen hain, kya unke dwara main apne yani sabke rachyita ko jaan sakta hoon ? Guruji, aap ki deeragh or swasth aayu ki kaamna karta hua aapse uttar ka abhilashu hoon.
#sir pandokhar Dham ka youtube channel hai, aur us Dham pr news 18 India ki team bhi gyi lekin Kuch pta nhi lga paya ,plz aap bhi reaserch kre aur hme btaye
नमन
🙏🌹SARKAR JI RAM JI RAM👌🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🌹
Mere prashan hai jab shiri Krishan g kehte hai Gita main k atma amar hai ....
Use koi maar nhi skata kaat nhi skata jala nhi skata ..
To fir garud puraan m kyu likha hi k marane k baad atama ko narak ya swaag l jaya jata h yam or unke duton k dwara ....
Jesa wo admi karam karata h....
Use vesa Dand milta hi....
Jese k use kholte tail M tala jata h...
Ya use jalti aag m fek dia jata hi...
Us pr khode mare jate h...y sab kese ho skata hai....
And dusra prashan y hai k....sab jab bhram h hai....to hame shiv k aad shakti k...ya anay Devi devtao k pujaa Karan murti puja krana kyu jroori hai....
Kya shiv or aadi shakti h bharam hai.....unki poja Karana bhakti karna bhram k Pooja or bhakti hai....
Jabki gurbani m bhi likha h....shuru m h k ek om kaar sat naam karta purk ....
Ek h naam hai jo sacha h.....usi ko pujo usi ko jaano .....
Guru g main maa kaali or bhagvaan shiv ko pujta hu .....
Kya m inki Pooja kr k bhram ko or atama ko jaan skata hu ....
Name navneet
From Punjab Khanna
Waha bhagwaan atma ko iss laukik jagat ke tavto se pare batate hai na ki paralaukik cheezo se...
"Sab brahma hai" Advait ka ye siddhant samajhne ke liye advait ke deep me jana hota hai jaise yaha ye keh rahe hai ki aam admi ke liye advait jeev-brahma ek samajhna impossible hai. Uske liye advait siddhant ko samajhna hoga... Jeev ko apne sarir ke saath brahma kabhi nhi kaha gya.
Ji brahma ke sagun sakar rup me advait ke hisab se 5devta hai shiv-devi-narayan-ganesh-surya aap inme se kisi ko apna isht maniye aur baki 4devta ko unka pratiaang.mtlb jitna apne isht ki respect krte hai utna hi baki 4devtaon ka bhi.5devta ek saman hi hai
Bhai guru bani jaisi bekar ki cheezo me mat phaso, sikh ved-vedic siddhant, murti puja jaisi koi cheez nhi mante.
Ji jaan skte hai.Lekin iske liye apko iss shetra me gyan lena hota hai.
धन्यवाद सर
गुरुजी प्रणाम
गोत्र का क्या आरम्भ है और क्या ये ऋषि के वंश है या उनके मानने वाले है?
कृपा करें
ओम नमः शिवाय!
Panchadev - Durga,Shiv,Vishnu,Surya, Ganapati
Minor correction
One thing i couldnt understand
Budda teachings are eternal n absolute truth so how it cud contradict n where it contradicted Hinduism.
Buddha is considered as latest incarnation of Lord Vishnu den why adi Shankaracharya opposed buddha.
It seems fight of philosophy not abt dharma.
Buddha teachings are superior n more logical and modern so it cud be a reason.
Why can't you think that Buddhists Philosophy can be taken from Vedas , because most of his methods and philosophies are related to advait vedant which is 4000 years old
Modern Western buddhism is based on zen teachings whose founder himself is a brahmin
It means shankaracharya was emerged as a critique to the Buddhism and it's ideas. And without Buddhism we wouldn't know him as now.
शंकराचार्य के सारे अद्वैत के विचार नागार्जुन और योगाचार के बौद्ध सम्प्रदायों से लिए हुए है।
उनके गुरु ने तथागत बुद्ध का आभार माना है ।
@@bauddhbhaarat5943 Buddha ko to respect waise bhi diya hi hai sabhi ne, aur nahi buddha ko kisine deny kia hai. Aur phle ye bhi jaan lo Buddha ne jis tarike se teachings di hai, Sankhya philosophy hi uska ek aadhar hai, jis tarike se Sankhya evolution k through existence ko samjhata hai waise hi buddha ne bhi bataya fir bhi dono same nahi hai. Aur to Aur buddha k kai shuruati teachers khud Sankhya scholars the. Iska matlab Buddha ki teachings Sankhya se li gayi hai. Kehne wale to ye bhi kh sakte hain. Aur to aur Nagarjun ki bhi baten Upnishads ki language se milti hain kyunki wo khud brahman the to unhone upnishad to padhe hi honge.
Cheejon me jara antar karna seekho dusro ki suni sunai baten mt bolo kahin bhi.
@@deepaksinghrawat5246 बेटा थोड़ा शोध करो बोलने से पहले। तथागत बुद्ध की पूरी दृष्टी उपनिषदों और वेदों की विरोधी है। बुद्ध ने आत्मा के सिद्धांत और वर्ण व्यवस्था का डंका थोक के खंडन किया है। सारे बाद के आधारभूत ग्रन्थ , पतंजलि, गीता इत्यादि ने बुद्ध से ऋण लिया है। आत्मा और वर्ण व्यवस्था के सिवाय सनातन धर्म में है क्या केवल अन्धविश्वास बचा।
@@bauddhbhaarat5943 chup pakhani tera buddha aur uske follwer ne hamare upanisad, tantra se sab gyan churaya hai.
Not only Buddhism, shiv avtari sri adi sankarachrya was born to vanish all atheist philosophy like Jainism, Buddhism etc.
I was big fan of shankracharya but when I SAW shankracharya caste system and female dominance then I started feeling less connected to his teaching.I was like he followed same hindusim even having so much gyan
Gayatri Mantra ke upar video banaiye.
🙏💐🌿🌹👏
👏👍👍👍👍👌
🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
To phir kya sahi hai dvait bad ya advaita vad aur hum sankaracharya, ramanujcharya, madhavacharya kinko sahi mane ?
Don't know sb bhatk rhe hai sciences, religion , philospher pta ni sach kya hau.nibody has complete answer or there is no answer😢😢
Bhai aap ek kaam karo tino ki philosophy ke basics ko suno uske baad vichar kro agar apko Bhagwan ke kisi bhi ruup ke prati bhakti bhav hai aur aap ma power hai apne apko surrender karne ka Bhagwan ko taab aap dvait vaad palan kijye
Agar aap tarkik ho Logic lagate ho ya apko jigyasa hai bhagwan ko gyan ke dwara(scriptures) to fir aap Advaita Vedanta philosophy padho
@@lakshmisharma2243 bhai wo apke upar depend karta hai agar aap ma Bhagwan ko serrander karne ka bhaw hai taab aap bhakti (dvaita) ko follow karo agar aap sochte ho Logic lagate ya agar bhagwan ko gyan dwara(scriptures) janana hai taab aap Advait follow karo , agar aap hinduism ko follow karna chahte ho science ke piche maat bhago
@@ShankarShankar-hb7bi it is an one year old comment.. I now following achintya bheda bhed tatva. Of chaitanya mahaprabhu.
Slight mistake is there it is panchayatan which consists of shiv, vishnu, surya ganesh & devi not bramha.
कुमारिल भट्ट महान थे
Adhbhut
🙏🙏
🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
बुद्ध की कोई बरोबरी नही कर शकता.न कोई निराकार भगवान न साकार भगवान
शंकराचार्य,उदयन,कुमारील भट कभी बौद्ध का वादविवाद मे पराभव नही कर सके
Esa kuch nhi hai bhudh ne keval ek shyaam padhti di vipasana or anapan satyog par shiv ne 112 vidhiya di or bhakti yog to en sabse bodho ki ati ahinsavaadi soch k karan desh gulam hua jiska samna sanatani kashatriyo ne kiya
कुमारिल भट्ट और आदि शंकराचार्य नै्ए बौद्धों को ए्ऐसा हराया कि आज तक खड़े नहीं हो पाए और नवबौद्ध का बौद्ध दर्शन से ही कुछ लेना देना असली बौद्ध महायान और हीनयान है बस बाकि सब नकली है
@@mayankagnihotri2780 मै इतिहास मे MA,SET,NET हू मुझे इतिहास थोडा समजता है इसलीये ये कपोलकल्पित कथा मत बताइये की,बौद्ध कीअहिंसा के कारण भारत गुलाम हूवा ये आपका मत पूर्वग्रहदूषित है
दुनिया का इतिहास देख लिजीए सबसे बडे बडे सम्राट बौद्ध के हुवे फिर वो भारतीय सम्राट अशोक,कनिष्क,मिनादर,हर्षवर्धन,पाल वंश
चीन का वंश हो,श्रीलंका का महानाम,तिस्स,अभय गामीनी,थायलंड का मिंग दो मिन,म्यानमार का अनवृथा,जपान का शोकोतो,मंगोल का खान वंश हो
ये सब बौद्ध थे .बौद्ध की अहिंसा व्यवहारिक है इसलीये आपके तर्क पूर्वग्रहदूषित है और किसने कोणसी विद्या दि हो इतिहास साक्ष है
Vedant is just a degraded version Nagarjuna's Shunyawad .
Advaita philosophy is older than you think
and you can read it's Sutra in chandogya Upanishads which is 600 bc old
Acharya Sankara just popularised this philosophy and nagarjuna gave sunyavad on 1-2 ad.
Jealousy 🤣🤣
Nirgun Brahma se Sagun Govind bhinn kahan hei?
आत्मा नही मानने से तुम्हे खाना नाही मिलेगा क्या ? कुच्छ भी जरा जैनो को पूछो वोह भी बात देंगे कोई आत्मा नाही होगी हर तरफ माया ही होगी 😂 जो जैन बौध्द ने बतायी है 🙏
👍👍
atma ko maths s smjana=adveet(2 nhi h)
atma=energy(consious energy=jb tk humen body m hoti h,tb tk consiousely control kr skte h,baher jane p pta nhi)
moksh=energy ka sorce of energy m milna(bcz her energy ka source hota h-jise m god khta hu)
ab etne sare bodies(living-bactria,virus,animal,humen etc)m energy h,so 1 ni bol skte
bt 2 ya 2 s jyda b ni bol skte,bcz source of energy ka khuch part her living ko mil ra h,esly actual m toh energy 1 hi h
ab y energy jo jhad(non living)ko living bna dete h,y bus different type of energy h(universes m many types of emergy exist krti h,like food s milne vali,wave is also energy bcz energy/frequency/vibration ko hi wave khte h,jisme frequency&vibration only upkaran m mapne ka pemana/measurement h)
sankrachary/kabir ke tym energy ka concept ni tha,klyug m jo atma ko dekh payega,vo use energy hi bolega,&energy ko describe ni kiya jata,use science ke through measure kiy h,fr us specific energy ka nam rakha jata h
atoms ko b todne p quarks particle ate h,ultimately science b atom ko tod tod ke yhi p aygi ki these are different type of energy
so sb mai god h,bcz sb living mai same type of energy/atma h,humen use consiousely control kr skta h(bcz mene kiy&heart s baher niklne s roka&mrte mrte bacha),bt dusre living use consiousely control ni kr skte
Moksh matlab to sucide hua na apne astitv ko hi samapt kar dena
बस मुस्लिम का डर उन्हे हिंदू बना गया😂😂😂
Guruji ki phone number ya kuch contact mil Sakta hae kya? Mujhe kuch puchna hae jo bohut jaruri hae
Jabhi Buddhist ko Bahamans ney maar maar ker khatam kerdiya!!😢😢
Kuchh bhi naa
Propoganda k lie
देश की हालत शंकर ने ही खराब कर रखी है 😂😂😂
बस उनको लगता है की उन्होंने देश बचाया है उसे ज्यादा खराब ही हुआ है
आज कितने बौध्द देश मुस्लिम है कोई भी नहीं 😂😂😂 बस मुस्लिम का डर उन्हे हिंदू बना गया😂😂😂
यदि शंकराचार्य महाराज भारत को बौद्ध ही रहने देते तो शायद मानव की इतनी दुर्गति यहां न होती।
सच्चाई छुप नहीं सकती बनावट के उसूलों से
खुशबु आ नहीं सकती कागज़ के फूलों से।
फिर तो पूरे भारत की अफगानिस्तान के जैसी दुर्गति होती
@pushyamitra_shung_ शंकराचार्य महाराज के बाद से क्या उखाड़ लिया है तुम्हारे हिंदुत्व ने सिवाय बच्चे पालने और पानी पूरी बनाने और खाने के ?
सब कुछ तो अफ़ग़ानियों या मुग़लों या अंग्रेज़ों ने बनाया है। यहां तक की स्वतन्त्र भारत का प्रतीक लाल किला मुग़लों ने बनाया , संसद अंग्रेज़ों ने बनाई।
केवल बौद्ध ही भारत को स्थिर और मज़बूत शासन दे सके। अरबों के फैलाव को भी चीन ने ही रोका।
@@chintz11 न केवल अफ़ग़ानिस्तान, पूरे भारत की दुर्गति बौद्ध धरम की अमावस के कारण हुई।
हिन्दू राजा सिवाय झगड़ने के क्या किये? क्या कर _रहे_ हैं ?
@@bauddhbhaarat5943 ek afghanistan tho bacha nhi sake, chhhuddist bharat me rahoge..wo tho hamare rajaon ne daya krke chor diya tmhe nhi tho aaj bharat me khojne par bhi nhi milte tumlog.
Agar chhhuddism ki koi aukat rehti tho bharat me ved nhi aate fir se. Aur waise bhi tumlog gaddar ho pushyamitr sunga Ke samay unaniyo se haath milaya tho tum chhhuddo ne.
4:40 Brahma nahi Maa Shakti
To wo to achha hua tha...ye shankaracharya ne bhot bara aparadh kia h budhha ki sikhai Hui technique ko bharat se bilupta ker dia...
Pranam ,vedo me gita me vyvharik ,dharmik ,vaigyanik , ye sab samahit hy tab kiyo sabhi hindu dharm ka virodh karta tha jabki hindu dharm samast manav kalyan ke liye hy.rajogun ,tamo gun ,satogun ,ye vykti visesh ke liye kaha gaya hy lekin ek vykti me ye sabhigun kabhi na kabhi prabhavi hota hy or karta hy.jaise Asakti ka na hona ,bhagvat puja ,satyachran ye satogun ,lobh asakati swarth ,ye rajogun tatha jis kriya me hinsa ,pramad ,moh use tamas samajhna chahiye ye gita me bhi hy or sahaj samajh sakte hy vidvan jan ,ab ye sabhi manav jivan me kabhi na kabhi hoga is se shayad koi vanchit rah sakta hy.
Ap kyu chale gaye 😢
log confusion karte hain 2 chijon me.
1. Darshan
2. Marg.
Darshan - dwait, adwait, dwaitadwait,, vishishthadwqit etc.... yeh darshan hain.
philosophies - jo explanation dene ka prayas karti hai, jag, bhagwan ka swrup etc ka.
2. Marg - bhakti, yog, karma, dnyan - yeh route hai.
toh aap adwait hokar bhakt ho sakte ho. adwaiti yogi ho sakte ho. usme koi problem nahi hai.
adwait kehta hai. sab me - sab roopon me- ek hi bhagwan hai. sat chit anand hai. isiko mai ek roop me dekhkar usi sacchidqnand ko bhajra hun. ismi koi paradox nahi hai
Sooooooohm
Bodho ko esa haraya ki bhudh aaj tak khade ni ho paye
Adi Sankara was a fool who sough nirvana through logic(sammuthi)
क्या सूर्य की उपासना आदिकालीन नहीं है?
Bilkul hai, ved me surya upasana varnit hai.
Indus valley se chali aa rhi hai ye
yes Bhakti is for those who can't think