iPhone 15 Pro Max vs Fujifilm X100VI! Smartphone OR Professional Camera?
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 5. 06. 2024
- Go to hide.me/versus and get 3 months of hide.me VPN free!
Can one of the most used smartphones, the iPhone 15 Pro Max compare to the results of a real professional camera? đ€ Stay tuned to find out as we delve into a detailed comparison between a smartphone and the latest FujiFilm X100VI where we test standard wide photos, portrait photos and even experiment with Fujiâs film simulations. đž
Get the devices here đ
iPhone 15 Pro Max: amzn.to/3rWQvbR
Fujifilm X100VI: amzn.to/3WxBABP
Gear we use to make videos đ·
amzn.to/3PP1VYL
For more details check out #VERSUSđ
versus.com/en/apple-iphone-15...
Check out our social media đ
whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaFx...
/ versus_comparisons
/ versus_com
/ versus_com
What happens in this video đ
0:00 Intro
1:05 Specs
1:51 Standard Photos
4:33 Portrait
6:47 Film Simulations
9:16 Video
10:27 Conclusion
* All Amazon links above result in a commission given to us by Amazon, with no extra cost to you! - VÄda a technologie
Would love to see this done again with the Xiaomi 14 ultra, Vivo X100 pro and S24 Ultra!
Will be much delighted đ
She is a fan of the iPhone and has an unbiased attitude towards other manufacturers.
Only xiaomi
A curious question: Are there people over eighty years of age who are very elderly people who own modern smart phones???
And Oppo Find X7 Ultra! The newest huawei would also be good.
The real comparison is between sensor size and pixel density. The fact that an iPhone can come anywhere near an APSc sized sensor is a computational marvel.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is almost as good as a $30000 camera
I suggest you add 100% crops to your photo comparison. Otherwise itâs very difficult to get the difference
especially considering it's a youtube video with horrendous compression not to mention their own video's compression
i don't understand why would you shoot in f5.6 for portraits? that's the reason you got less bokeh in fuji. You have come down to 2.8 to get proper bokeh and portrait shot.
clowns
Should have compared it to xiaomi 14 ultra
Wow, what a video! To the point, concise, informational and exactly what most people would be interested in when it comes to this camera. đ
Amazing video as always
The sky captured by the iPhone always looks like it's about to rain because of how dark it appears in the photo. đ€·ââïž
Dope video!
id still pick the x100vi
over all better quality photos and videos
performs well at night too
It is stunning to see that the iPhone can be compatible , with the Fujii. This is an amazing video đ„đ
Suggestion: sample photos are too small to watch on a phone, though bigger screen wouldnât be a problem. Make it a little zoom in if youâre comparing on something particular like for example: a missed edge detection on a portrait mode or a detail comparison between two photos. Great content though!
Unique comparison video
I tried a whole bunch of Android smartphones this year hoping to find something that would make me switch back to Android, even though I am 100% in the Apple ecosystem (iPhone, Mac mini, iPad).
The only one I found that could replace my iPhone is the Pixel 8 Pro. I didnât encounter the same issues I usually find with Android smartphones. The voice command works perfectly (unlike other Android devices where, for some reason, I can never get the voice command to work on the Gboard keyboard). Additionally, when setting up a new phone, you can have an exact copy of your old Pixel, just like you can with a new iPhone.
This isnât the case with Samsung, etc., where you end up having to put all the apps back into folders yourself, reorganize everything, etc.
In the end, I found that the photo and video quality were not as good as on the iPhone, so I kept my iPhone 15 Pro Max and returned the Pixel. However, Iâm still looking forward to seeing the Pixel 9 Pro XL. I would be very happy to see Google reclaim its crown as the king of photography.
They have the resources and talent; I donât know whatâs missing for them to achieve it.
Having a disability, voice command allows me to write very quickly without exhausting myself, so itâs indispensable for me. Additionally, I donât understand why, when copying data from an old Android smartphone to a new one, you donât get an exact copy of what you had on the old one. You have to reorganize everything, redo your folders from scratch, etc. This is a basic feature, and Android is advanced enough to have this functionality. I will never understand this.
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, Xiaomi 14 Ultra,Vivo X 100 pro easily beat the iphone 15 pro maxđ
The comparison đ„
Must be hard getting the Fuji considering how quite rare it is now. Even when it's only recently launched.
Artificial scarcity. Fujifilm is now following the hermes,supreme, stanley cup, marketing strategy. Poor people fight over it on ebay while the rich just buys a Leica.
Compare this camera against Sony Xperia 1 V or the up coming mark VI
Amazing Comparison đđ»đđ»
I think the Fujifilm X100VI is not a professional camera. Yes, the price is relatively high for a fixed lens APSC camera, it has professional specs and features, but it aims toward more casual users who want something to carry around all day every day, and want a camera that has the look and feel of a film camera with digital capabilities. Also, why do you shoot portraits at f5.2 on the Fuji, whereas the blur effect on the iPhone looks like fake f2 ?
X100VI is the definition of a professional camera...pros use it as a secondary body for street/travel/documentary/reportage etc. It is the best for what it is (or Ricoh).
Not everything is product/portrait/wedding photography...
For amateurs, i consider it a waste to get x100VI as an only camera.
Just get something like X-T20 (30, 50) and a pancake lens and you get the same thing but more versitile.
Just got offered a X100vi. I used to take a lot of pictures, but now I'm mainly using an (older) iPhone. I dunno if I'm going to use the camera that much... Is the demand still v. strong?
Still very strong demand
nice video đŻ
Aperture to 5.2, for portraits? In order to achieve higher depth of field, why? And then wonder why the bokeh is more prominent on the phone.
looking at the fujis results, I'd say it's closer to what an s24 ultra would have.
no phone captures images similar to an actual camera, closest being shooting RAW with a Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
@@notlahaanbro stop yapping nonsenseâŠ.thatâs almost the result the s24ultra always bringâŠnatural
@@obasekiraphael Have a look at the images yourself lol. No phone has still matched the texture and detail processing of it and just the overall detail and quality (except others that also use the same sensor like mi 10s/10/mix4 but they still fall behind). It's 27MP natively. It's default images are as detailed as samsung's "200MP" mode (which btw, since these are multi-bayer sensors, they never look like the actual MP it's stating).
If the iPhone just had the Fuji film simulations, I would cancel my preorder
Indoor performance awesome đ DSLR
Hey now, let's check it out.
i laways hate the potrait on the iphone
>We changed to f5.2 for more DoF
>Also in the image comparison keeps saying how Fuji has less bokeh
Brother, if you're shooting portraits @ 28mm w/ APSC, it's criminal to drop from f2 to f5.2
Calling this a professional camera is an absolute crime lmfao. It's a FIXED lens compact camera..
Also why do you keep saying "looks more detailed" without cropping in, I guarantee every shot on the fuji has tons more detail. If you're already trying to "match" the pictures with DoF, why not actually compare the images closer.
*And can you please do some other shots other than pictures of yourself jesus christ*
Nice â€
Do it with s24u
Problem: You canât buy Fujifilm X100VI anywhere in the world now. đ
Good video
Why does the Fujifilm camera seem like shot on Samsung S24 Ultrađ€đ€
Samsung is more dull
@@r.k.lalnunzira I understand that, but see the pink hue, over sharpening etc. It's very similar to S24ultra
You say the image quality is as good as on the Fuji and Samsung
No
Both the s24 ultra and the Fuji is basically same with oversaturating, overexposing and oversharpening issues. The photos look really cartoonish just like on my s24 ultra. I have a sony A7 IV full frame mirrorless and the shots looks almost like iPhone. More realistic, more consistent and more details. I almost mixup the shots of iPhone and sony cuz of their identical results. I even saw one video where iPhone almost looks same as the sony but due to iPhone having a slight issue in edge detection, it was easily identified. I must say this girl is kinda biased
Ideally the comparison should be with a DSLR camera actually costing Indian price around 1.5-2 lakh rupees and camera is anyday better
Let's see the Fujifilm vs other flagship camera phones.
your jacket amazing
Huawei P70 Ultra , S24Ultra ,Oppo Find X7 Ultra, Xiaomi 14 Ultra,Pixel 8 Pro Vs FUJI FILM 100
The iPhone is the standard bro. It doesnât imply itâs better but it has certainly set itself as the standard, itâs like the US Dollar, if youâre measuring the strength of an any currency, youâre most likely going to measure it against the dollar, and thatâs just the way it is bro.
@@404Learning "the standard" can't even get the skintone right đđ
@@maejkim ya itâs laughable bro đđ, but this what happens when a product dominates in popularity, you canât do a comparison test without the iPhone being there despite it not being the best anymore
It's obvious that there are significantly better phones to compare with better features, but you chose to do it with the iPhone.
because the uninformed masses think iPhones take best pictures. Also, majority of Americans use iPhones so it generates clicks.
This Fuji is not even an interchangeable less camera. This is not a professional camera but a hobbyist camera. If at least you used a Fuji xt5 or something
le X100VI a le meme capteur et le meme processeur que le X-T5 ! .... et l'iPhone n'a pas d'objectif interchangeable. Donc achetez vous un cerveau pour mieux comprendre...
iPhone simply needs better anti reflection coating to compete with the fuji claity and contrast
It still wouldnât match the Fuji. When you blow up the pictures on a bigger display like a laptop or TV set, the iPhone shortcomings will be immediately apparent. On a tiny phone display, people are fooled into thinking that theyâre comparable.
It's the sensor size, aps-c vs 1/2.5", it's physics, larger sensors, bigger glass. If it was that simple to compete, they would've done it, people spend serious money on big lenses and big sensors.
@@dsego84 a huge medium format ccd sensor would lose to a tiny modern iphone camera matrix in RAW so it's not all about the size. But where iphones and most other phones really fall behind cameras is in optics, it's literally plastic lenses with some poor anti reflection coating.
And we shant forget it's raw photos so all the iPhones photos could be tweaked to perfection.
A curious question: Are there people over eighty years of age who are very elderly people who own modern smart phones?!
s24 ultra vs professional camera
As long as they do not figure out video stabilisation it makes no sense to buy those cameras. We are increaslingly video-based
Use a gimbal if you care so much about video lol
its not even close,.......
The Fuji looks more like a phone to me đ
On a small screen for sure, try making large prints or zooming in and you can easily see the difference, any phone picture falls apart quickly and turns mushy. You can try downloading some sample pictures and compare.
@@dsego84 ok. Yeah that is true. But most ppl will view it on a smartphone and compression on social media will likely make everything look the same đ„Čđ„Č
ì€ìí ë¶ë¶ìŽ ëč ìĄë€ì. ìŒê°ìŽŹìììë ììŽí°ì êł ì§ì ìž êł ì€íž íì ë돞ì ìŽ íëë§ìŒëĄë ììŽí°ì ì 돞ì ìž ìčŽë©ëŒì ëčê”ììČŽë„Œ íêž°ë ëŻŒë§íŽì§ëë€.
Samsung galaxy S24 Ultra is better than the iphone 15 pro maxđ
Title is hilariously misleading. The Fujifilm X100VI is not a professional camera. It is a hobbyist camera. No professional photographer is shooting weddings or magazine shoots with the X100VI.
Where da hell is a 2X zoom lens on an iphone???
Can't really see true differences on on screen side by sides. Certainly better on the TV vs phone , but such limited size.
Having had a Fujifilm XT1 for a long time now, there's simply zero comparison vs GFs iPhone 14 Pro when I output some wall prints at work. The relentless bad white balance and yellow hue seems go continue into the 15.
phone = looks a bad vfx, fuji = able for immersion. PHONE = Color unrealistic, Fuji color ok. Who wants to shoot with fake colors ?
professional cameras will always be better than smartphone cameras...
am not a model or a pro photographer so my phone cam is enough for me
Fujifilm x100v look better â€
And i am guessing the iPhone won the blind camera comparison since you did not mention the results đ€
Huawei puraa next
Ihr habt fast auf jedem Bild die selbe Frau drauf. Waere nett mal ein paar andere Motive zu sehen.
Shooting portraits in f/5.6? just lol
Try this with Samsung
Love the iPhone photos. Cancel your pre-order now people.
Vous pouvez toujours prendre RDV avec votre opticien
Fujifilm and xiomi 14 ultra...
Don't put a photo of yourself taken by the iPhone on Tinder! đ„°đ„°â€
đ
Returned my fuji x100vi. iphone comes really close and it's always with you.
IPhone with yellowing effects
I don't understand why your face on the iphone looks so not good
â€â€â€â€
Compare it with Sony A7Siii đ
Pas difficile de trouver des comparatifs sur youtube.... mais personnellement j'ai vendu mon Sony A7Siii pour le X100VI. Le Sony Ă©tait trĂšs bon, mĂȘme trop parfait, trop chirurgicale donc sans Ăąme, sans odeur, trop propre donc au final sans intĂ©rĂȘt. En fait c'est comme ceux qui retouchent leurs photos pour les rendre parfaite... elles n'ont plus aucun intĂ©rĂȘt. Le X100VI a une Ăąme, il n'est peut-ĂȘtre pas parfait mais on ne se lasse jamais de l'utiliser et c'est toute la diffĂ©rence avec un appareil photo ordinaire ou professionnel.
Why you compared with iphone - you really didn't have any better phone??
now give Xiaomi 14 ultra and Fujifilm you will understand how they are the same
In what way are they the same?
@@notlahaan direct, exposure, contrast, detail, Xiaomi 14 ultra is made like a professional camera, and not just like an iPhone taken out and shot
â@@notlahaanLeica (smart camera) versus Fujifilm (digital camera)
@@user-ds1pv8xb7n first of all, the fujifilm x100vi is not a professional camera. It's a compact camera with a fixed 28mm lens for point-and-shoot (& arguably street photograhpy). Leica cameras are in a completely different league and the price reflects that (being in the 10,000$ range).
Whilst I do agree, that xiaomi has a cool approach to smartphone photography and the images really can look like from an actual camera unlike the samsungs and iphones of this word, it's still miles off from a cheap APSC DSLR, especially when it comes to detail and texture processing & artifacting - not to mention an actual pro-grade camera.
@@user-ds1pv8xb7n I like the x14u. But it's nowhere near a professional camera. The fuji in this video is also not a pro camera, heck even a cheap dslr is more pro than this fuji x100vi
Iphone is hundred years behind)) it never can be better than real camera. IPhone pictures looking like cartoon pictures with gray skin tone))
Wow early
The Fuji is really good đ
Jesus, you are very narcissistic person....
Jesus is a narcissist?
the dumbest comparison ever.
Worst choice of smartphone to do this comparison with
No
No
Nope.
Just another iPhone haterâŠ
cope harder android meatrider
Fake comparison