Itâs a way of getting your evidence ahead of time so they can counter it. Simply fill out forms, do not confide as a co-complainant. They are not on your side. They file paperwork, and use regulations to their advantage. Get the company handbook. Understand the company handbook. Know your rights before an issue arrives.
Nobody is on the employeeâs side and that goes from government down to other employees and the EBT-card holders they are slaving to feed with their taxes.
idk if that how it is in other country. but from my experience. Hr maybe on the side of the company. but the ppl that work in the hr themselves, is on your side.
@@scottgarner1724 to not be an ass? because they're also an employee that've been in my place once? because the rule is dumb and they dont personally believe or respect it but the job pay the bill? because they would have done the same in my shoe so they understand me and dont wanna punish me or throw me under the bus???
Yep oldest trick in the book this person is pretentious as hell and is immediately hostile as soon as she's spoken too I'm guessing she's an HR major who's never worked anywhere before cause you try to talk to your bosses like that in the real world gonna be a target on your back and they'll find a different reason to fire your ass simply cause you caused them problems and management doesn't like dealing with problems
â@@doctormalleycatLol....spot on. You go ahead and try responding to your upchain in that tone and tenor. See ya! Btw, the right to free speech only applies to infringement by a governmental entity, not a private company. And most states are "at will". In other words, the company WILL dictate to you, you WILL comply or you WILL be out the door. It's not right, it's not fair, but it is LEGAL!
That's why it's generally up to you to create your own. Forward emails to your personal accounts, record conversations, etc And obviously don't tell them that you're doing this. They will try and use company policy against you to silence you if you let them know that you're doing it, But the truth is that it's not actually legal to prevent you from creating your own paper trail. That's basically interfering with your ability to have your own evidence and therefore interfering with the laws that protect you. In the event that it came to a legal dispute involving lawyers, it would be considered obstruction of justice.
Or "We're not the government, you absolutely have the right to free speech. We're a private company and we have freedom of association, and as such, we're choosing not to associate with you anymore."
Iâm so non-confrontational, but Iâm getting a LOT out of these videos. Itâs helping me organize my thoughts, and get closer to the point where I can stand up for myself at work.
I was Veronica, they fired me. When I asked why they said YOU DO NOT FIT INTO OUR WORK STYLE. I didn't work OT, they couldn't never reach me on my days off, there was a click that would be late the bosses friends she hired I'd go find a boss when the clock would be 30/45 mins late. Just a very oppressive place to work.
HR is NOT and has never been there to support the employees, THEY ARE MOT YOUR FRIENDS ! They are paid shills by the company, do not talk to them unless you have your lawyer with you.
Bosses will stalk employeesâ social mediaâŠ.but to your point, they may argue that her social media is affecting her productivity, or she posted from company equipment on company time, blah blah blah. Freedom of speech is not unlimited.
@@lanceknightmare yeah, many companies hate that. i know when i worked in IS we blocked access to social media for 99% of employees. hors worked is easy to measure and has long been what is used. for remote workers hours worked is totally useless because it is so easy to fake. they need to pay, at least remote workers, by the amount of work you get done. of course if you get a really difficult task and fail to accomplish it, do you not get paid?
When working for a F500 I and all my coworkers kept all the supervisors in the company blocked on facebook. Just in case. Social media isn't a thing on the internet. It's the part of your real life that intersects with the internet. You don't owe it to work to change or forget who you are.
Or, for that matter, herself. We don't know that her real name is Veronica or that she really works in an office. We don't, in fact, know that she is a she. It could be a guy named "Biff" who pumps gas.
Exactly I wouldn't care personally especially as nobody can identify them. The racists who got fired were because they got identified and the company made the decision not to be affiliated with them. My company required a covid vaccine and the union agreed. People left and some whined but it was common sense for an office that didn't want to have people out sick over it
"Veronica! Why on earth do you refuse to be the abject coward that I am?" Turned up at an HR disciplinary hearing a lot of years ago. Allowed to have a companion to help me. The companion was a lawyer. You wouldn't believe how quickly that hearing moved into reverse - they really should have been fitted with beepers.
Sadly my attorney said " you're an at will employee and they can fire you without any explanation. Just like you have the right to quit at will." The attorney went on to say it's most likely company politics and you'll never get an explanation." Better to be self employed.
A company can't fire someone for a discriminatory reason... For example because of their race, religion, gender identity, or sexual orientation. I'm pretty sure they can fire someone for their speech though. The first amendment doesn't apply to private businesses, only to the government. So, like when people get fired because of viral Karen videos for example... That would be getting fired for speech. If an employer found out an employee was posting a bunch of pro-Nazi stuff on social media, I think someone could be fired for that. Free speech does not mean free from the consequences of said speech. Just means that the government can't outlaw it.
â@@Exis247Sure, you can spend the time and money to sue. And you'll never recoup either. Infringement of speech/expression doesn't apply to a private entity.
@@Exis247 you cannot, your 'Right to Free Speech' is only protected from government action. You could sue the government if they put you in jail for your speech, or you were given a fine for your speech or something to that extent. But a private employer can just say 'I don't like what you say' and fire you for that reason and it is 100% legal. You can be fired for political opinions, having a bad haircut or really many other reasons, as long as it's not race/gender/medical/military/. All the talk on the internet of 'Oh that employer better watch out you have to call a lawyer and get a big payday' is just useless power fantasy. That's not how the law works. There are very few worker protection laws in the USA and until those laws are changed or added to, then employers have the upper hand. Now, you might be able to (especially if you are a person with very sought after skills) get a job with a special contract that allows you to have certain rights, which could be legally binding, but I think the vast majority of people will not have that.
Veronica must have a union job because most jobs in at-will states can fire you for ANYTHING as long as itâs not discrimination against a protected class.
Wrongful termination can also a very costly battle for the companyâŠâŠand lawyers only need to show intent of wrongful termination to get a huge settlement for clients.
â@waytoocoolforme ...rarely will you get a settlement or a lawyer that'll take a wrongful termination case. You're probably thinking of a "back-pay" or compensation case they are different.
â@@waytoocoolforme the number of wrongful termination court cases that result in a 'huge settlement' for their clients is a tiny minuscule fraction of the ones that result in their clients spending a lot of money for nothing. At best you might get backpay for the time you were fired, but even that is going to very rarely happen. And keep in mind, the whole time you are in that court battle, you will be unemployed- and if you are in the process of suing your employer, or sued your employer in the past it WILL come up in a background check and will be a major red flag for hiring in the future. In the USA our laws protect very very few workers rights, and until those laws are changed there is very little that we can do from a legal standpoint. But then look at our politicians and look at the voting base. Our laws aren't getting any better any time soon.
But ... but ... but . I'm your MANAGER. I'm GOD and you are a little peasant who must bow and scrape when I walk past ... The power trip of every newly-promoted supervisor
1. Scare them badly enough and they will be afraid to fire you, because they know that you know your rights and you'll fight back. If you are generally a good employee and they merely wanted to threaten you to make you compliant, they will probably think it's easier to just make sure you don't get promoted and keep you than to let you go and risk you getting angry about it. 2. Never, ever use a former employer as a reference. Even if you think they are going to be good, they may stab you in the back or blindly say something that makes you sound bad. Always get someone you worked with there who likes you to act as a peer reference. Far more predictable, and they're not likely to do the things that will scare away an employer.
Usually Veronica is on point but this time she made a mistake. A company cannot violate your first amendment rights. They can violate labor laws, they can be guilty of discrimination, retaliation is also illegal but not your 1st amendment rights. Your first amendment rights can only be violated by the government. Your employer can tell you what you can or can't post on social media and you are under no legal obligation to do what they say. This can get you fired and you might possibly have a wrongful to termination lawsuit but not a 1 amendment lawsuit.
The first Amendment and other's we refer to as "rights" are not given to us by the Constitution, the Constitution lays out that the government legally cannot violate those rights and has an obligation to protect them. The rights exist separate from the government and so other entities can still violate them. Referring to those rights by the amendment that outlines what they are is just a shorter way of stating them. Free speech for example can be misconstrued in its meaning while saying First Amendment is more precise. As you've stated violating Rights can lead to consequences for non-governmental entities as the government has an obligation to protect those rights. Because of this I do not see Veronica as being wrong in the way you seem to infer.
@@bregenoranthoran1820 the first amendment only protects your speech from the government, there for a business can't violate your free speech rights. For example I can cuss at and call a police officer derogatory names and aside of running a foul of disturbing the peace laws I can't be arrested or fined for cussing at and calling that police officer names . On the other hand business have code of conduct policies and cussing at and calling a coworker derogatory names absolutely can get me fired from that work place and it is in no way a violation of my first amendment rights. Like wise I can post and say what ever I want on social media and not have any fear of being arrested (with a few exceptions) but the social media platform is well with in their right ban me from their platform for conduct they consider unacceptable and that is not a violation of my first amendment rights, also my employer can decide they no longer want to employ mee based on my social media conduct and that again is not a violation of my first amendment rights. So yes in these scenario where her employer is asking her to delete her post there is no first amendment violation and Veronica threatening to sue over it is wrong.
@@thisfool89 Actually, if Veronica's social media is about worker's rights or discussions that are protected speech of workers (forming a union for example), then it could fall into it. Also, Veronica states she's not violating company social media policy, which means the company has a policy and as such is bound to that policy. The company can change the policy, but as of now, Veronica hasn't violated it. The manager is actually wrong here. Veronica is also wrong in that freedom of speech doesn't apply to private companies. She's making the wrong argument.
@@bregenoranthoran1820 Veronica can not be forced to curb her speech online, but if her boss doesn't like her content, he can fire her unless she has a contract laying out restrictions to online content that she has violated.
I'm assuming you were referring to the part in the video where the manager said she's putting the company in a bad light. Which, how could she be if she never mentioned where she works. In which case, great point.
@@silverhammer7779For legal purposes yes. If they want to do anything to her about it, they have to prove she blasting the company specifically. Which they canât.
Manager should have never given a heads up. Should have just let HR take care of a situation like this. If this was just a scare tactic from the manager then it obviously failed and Veronica should contact HR herself. And depending on what state she lives in or what she signed when she got hired, she can definitely be fired for social media presence that harms the company.
And then file suit for wrongful termination and let a court or an arbitrator decide if and how Veronica's media presence "harms the company" and to what, if any, extent.
â@silverhammer7779 depends on the state. At will states (every state besides montana) can fire you for any reason (except an illegal one, or for no reason). You, just as well as I, means you could get fired for dang near anything. You could spin up a wrongful termination, but that's a huge financial burden on the filer.
@@TwitchyHarpIts already illegal to fire someone for informing others of their rights. In fact, itâs one of the big no-noâs the triggers an investigation into the company.
If they fire her for the videos, itâs an easy lawsuit. Telling people their rights, in any way, does not hurt a company in any way the law considers legal.
I ran for congress and I have many views that donât align with the programs my company supports. I was very blunt on my stance in certain areas. Of course, I made my profession known in my campaign, but I never mentioned my employers by name. I never received so much as a call from HR or upper management. I enjoy my career and enjoy going to work. I am very proud to be working for my employer and thankful for the opportunities they give me. I am so thankful for the mutual respect we showed each other even though some ideas didnât align.
Just make sure you have your phone on record in your pocket--even if it's not necessarily legal in your state. They really don't like knowing you have a personal record.
Yes, but that right has nothing to to with private businesses and your job. Freedom of Speech means you can't be imprisoned by the government for your speech. But you can most certainly be fired for it.
As an HR student in Canada, I have seen social media stop some from getting an interview đź Some companies have new hires sign a 1-3 page policy on internet use & social media practices đ”âđ«
You do not, in fact, have a right to say anything you like and *stay employed*. An employer can definitely fire you for using your free speech. Your "right to free speech" only means "the government can't put a gun to your head and tell you that you're not allowed to say that" - literally nobody else can violate that right. The moment anyone starts screaming "free speech!" for anything else, I know they don't know what they're talking about. An employer has certain limits of what speech they're allowed to fire you for, but generally if you go around saying "My favorite color is blue" they are allowed to fire you and say that because their logo is green they feel you are telling people that their logo isn't beautiful. If an employer decides that your "free speech" isn't pleasing to them and fires you, they are not violating your rights. You still have every right to say what you want and go work for someone else who doesn't mind it. Veronica would have a much better argument to say that courts have found that an employee has the legal right to tell others what their rights are, and she didn't even mention what her real name is, what she really does for work, her actual gender, or where she works (we don't know that she is a woman named Veronica that does office work, she could be a guy named Ralph who is a mechanic and has a woman who does voice acting for him for the videos), so if they let her go that would probably be illegal retaliation against her for lawfully telling others about their rights.
Free speech only applies to government regulation. A lawyer wouldn't really do anything in this scenario as free speech laws do not really apply to a private business unless it violates a very specific labor law.
"You can easily lose your job if you said something in an online forum that insulted your boss, the company you work for, or a co-worker. You can also be terminated if you expressed an opinion online that goes against your employer's image." Getting your lawyer involved does not alter that. It just drags it out. Meanwhile, you're still fired.
Depends on the state. Not all states are at will... Some companies, the hr policy is so around to terminate an employee, they may be placing themselves into trouble by not following their hr policy... And an attorney is probably more capable of determining if they engaged in wrong doing. But... My issue with this code is that the first amendment doesn't apply to private companies including upon free speech rights of the employee... As it is only directed at the government.
@@jdramirez77 Your so right about that. 1st amendment speech has no bearing on a private entity. That said, one can criticize companies in general and offer advice on protecting one's workplace rights without mentioning a particular company. That's where people fall down and whine about their 'free speech'.
Actually no private company has to respect anyone's right to the freedom of speech. I would stay with you the rest of the video where she was fired and escorted out of the building by security
The real change in Corporate America--where companies stopped rewarding hard workers with raises and promotions, and stopped valuing merit and productivity and seeing those traits as a threat and liability--happened at EXACTLY the same time when they changed the name of the Personnel Department to the "Human Resources" Department. They stopped viewing their employees as Persons (with loyalty initiative creativity, and feelings), and started seeing them as "resources" (like toner cartridges or desks...)
At 1.01 Veronica is stating that HR or her boss is trying to infringe her right to free speech. But the First Amendment states that âCongress shall make no lawâŠâŠ.abridging the freedom of speechâŠâ (and this also includes state, county or municipal legislatures) it merely protects a personâs freedom of speech from any sanction by any organ of the state. The idea that it protect oneâs freedom from sanction by any private organisation is not true. If one expresses views which are unacceptable to a private organisation or is deemed to bring that organisation into disrepute (eg expressing anti-Semitic views or pro-abortion views) one can be sanctioned or dismissed. The First Amendment does not give one all encompassing freedom of speech. Veronicaâs threats of legal action are actually a bluff.
Very true. Her only argument that might protect her is that she is engaging in protected labor organizing activities. Especially of they are dumb enough to say thst people from work are reading it and therefore its disruptive. At the point where shes encourgaing peope at work to stick up for their rights, it starts getting into thst. Its still kinda sjetchy and i wouldnr wNt to be un the position of having to rely on that to defend myself. But theres probably some meat there. But it might make somone back off. And depending on the situation, it might make somone bavk down. But more likely they would just find a different way to fire her.
First rule of thumb, HR is not your friend. I got chewed out by my manager/HR for not writing my birthday down on a sheet of paper she passed around during a staff meeting. She acted like it was her right to know why I refused to give consent. I told her my reasons were personal, and therefore none of her business. She told me "just so you know, I do all the payroll and have access to that information, so I know it's next week." I told her "just so you know, this conversation should have ended the moment I said I didn't want my employer imposing themselves in my personal life, and I'd appreciate it if you'd respect my boundaries." It blows my mind how managers get that little bit of power and think it makes them the ruler of every aspect of their subordinates' lives.
Social media has really tainted the work place and not for good. I read an article saying you don't stop being an employee after your shift ends and questionable behavior can hurt the company based on what you post on social media. Well if they expect me to represent the company 24/7 i should be paid 24/7. If i do legal thing regardless of how it's viewed it shouldn't be the company's business. Even if i binge drink or something and I'm acting legally they should stay out of it. The mentality of when will this start effecting your work shouldn't be a factor. Thats like saying well you are going to die one day and leave us hanging so we shouldn't hire you. Companies have termination policies in place. If you make a bad decision you can just terminate and move on. Don't hire based on the fact this may not work out years down the road.
This isn't a social media thing. Companies could ALWAYS do this. If they saw you marching for Civil Rights you could get fired. If you participated in an anti Vietnam war demonstration you could get fired. No nukes rally? FIRED! Of course, it works the other way too. White power march? FIRED. Social media has just made it easier for (1) People to express their opinions (or act like idiots) and (2) For the entire world, their employer included, to see those opinions (or actions). Freedom of Speech does not equal Freedom from Responsibility.
I used to work for a city government and there were a total of six people besides myself in our department. When my lazy, imperious manager kept harassing and threatening me and giving me a hard time, I reported her to HR and requested an investigative meeting with HR and her own manager. There was a TON of work about to be due that had to be turned in to the state government. After the meeting, she gave me a negative annual review and I resigned immediately. I saw all the tears on my coworker's eyes because one of my coworkers retired a few days before, and another one was about go on maternity leave. They were understaffed and no one was able to do their job and mine as well.
A private company can take action against any employee that directly, or indirectly disrupts company goals. That includes the bottom line of making money.
but get rid of here. When they get tired of here crap all the time. P: Veronika, what time is it? V: You don't have no watch? P: No I.... V: Well go get a watch, Its not my job to give you the time! Every single time for every little thing veronika is a PITA.
I'm not a lawyer, but the First Amendment WOULD NOT APPLY HERE. America's right to free speech is a defense against the U.S. government censoring or retaliating against you - it has nothing to do with what private corporations may or may not do with regard to your speech.
I so hope Veronica had her lawyer look over her work contract. Some places actually include a no social media clause. Not sure how legal that is, but I've seen it.
The âIâm not breaking any social media policyâ is going to end up getting companies to state upfront that if you want the job, you canât have any social media. Tread carefully.
They wonât provide the real reason, because that information could be used against the company in a wrongful termination lawsuit. Theyâll just use the ole âDue to the needs of the company âŠâ platitudes.
So, in this state: Employer: You clocked in at 8:01 twice this week? You're fired. Court: Why did you fire them? Employer: They were late twice. Court: Show us the employee handbook that the employee had access to or a signature from the employee acknowledging that they were informed this was their designated time to arrive at work. Employer: Uh... uh... Court: Show us evidence of when you had a meeting with them to tell them there was a problem. Employer: Uh... uh... Court: Show us where you put them on a probationary period and told them what was wrong and what the consequences are, and their signature acknowledging that you did so. Employer: Uh... uh... Court: Show us evidence that they were late. Employer: Uh... uh... Court: Sounds like it was wrongful termination. We find for the employee. Damages awarded are 100% of the employee's income for up to 3 years or whenever they get a new job. Most employees won't take it that far. But if an employer is making threats over minor stuff and the employee says "you will be hearing from my lawyer about this," the employer knows that the employee is not going to take it lightly, and it's in their best interests to not fire the employee as long as they are generally okay at their job.
Maybe she doesn't care. Maybe she knows that a person is far more likely to get promoted by getting a higher level job somewhere else and changing jobs than by applying for a promotion at their current employer.
Well, if she never gets promoted she can move on. The important thing is to stand up for yourself and know what YOUR rights are as an employee. I wish they had veronika when I was in the workforce.
How would HR even know? I have never seen anything identifiable to a specific company or person, as far as I know even the Veronica name is fictitious, the characters are stick figures. I just want to know what paranoid manager sees these videos and then asks the employee if this is them?
I've filled out job applications that demand to know what all your social media account names are, and you'd better have some because if not they will say you're lying and not hire you. (So I give them the name of one of my accounts where almost everything is private, so you can see I'm there, but only friends can see what I say.)
@@tmf866 Who knows, maybe Veronica can make something on this. I haven't had any employers ask me for my social media presence/account names. They have let me know that if something should come up they would investigate for any mentions of who I worked for or mentions of other employees and that could become grounds for dismissal. Fine by me, never talk about them, no problems.
I think I might have woke my neighbor up when a very loud and happy "FUCK YEAH!" escaped my mouth as I was watching this. As such you will be hearing from my lawyer. . . . . . Joking... about the lawyer part. My neighbor's kid is a whiny brat.
An actual company wouldn't bother setting up a meeting with HR, or even mention anything about the online presence of the employee. She'd just find herself being "laid off", permanently.
My 'only' challenge with this is trying to use "Free Speech" With the assumption she is a USA employee, the right to "Free Speech" is only protected against Government attempting to limit the individual. So unless "Veronica" works for a government agency, the Corporation can place employment restrictions on her speech. With that said, it better VERY CLEARLY lay those conditions out in her contract. As we know, from other videos, Veronica KNOWS her contract and will even offer you a copy.
"So, you've clearly been _watching_ my videos, right?" "...I mean, yeah..." "Okay, and how many times have I ever brought the company up _by name_ in any of these videos? How many people in the world even know where I work?" "... ... ..." "That's right. None. I think we're done here."
Veronica was then given a series of write ups over the course of three weeks for âimproper conductâ over trivial matters that were legally permissible before being let go. Never talk to your higher ups in a corporate job like this, because their pettiness knows no bounds and if you arenât cooperative, as crappy as the practice is, they will gut out members of the team they believe will inconvenience them.
Unless Veronica works for the government (federal, state, or local) the first amendment doesn't apply as it protects one from the government infringing upon free speech. However, what she does say that's applicable is that it doesn't violate the companies policy on social media.
HR is on the side of the company, not the employee.
Itâs a way of getting your evidence ahead of time so they can counter it. Simply fill out forms, do not confide as a co-complainant. They are not on your side. They file paperwork, and use regulations to their advantage. Get the company handbook. Understand the company handbook. Know your rights before an issue arrives.
Nobody is on the employeeâs side and that goes from government down to other employees and the EBT-card holders they are slaving to feed with their taxes.
idk if that how it is in other country. but from my experience.
Hr maybe on the side of the company.
but the ppl that work in the hr themselves, is on your side.
@landymark5614 your very lucky.
HR work for the company, so what benefit is it for them to side with you against the company?
@@scottgarner1724 to not be an ass? because they're also an employee that've been in my place once? because the rule is dumb and they dont personally believe or respect it but the job pay the bill? because they would have done the same in my shoe so they understand me and dont wanna punish me or throw me under the bus???
Companies will avoid paper trail. Then will fire someone for a different reason
Happened several times.
Yep oldest trick in the book this person is pretentious as hell and is immediately hostile as soon as she's spoken too I'm guessing she's an HR major who's never worked anywhere before cause you try to talk to your bosses like that in the real world gonna be a target on your back and they'll find a different reason to fire your ass simply cause you caused them problems and management doesn't like dealing with problems
â@@doctormalleycatLol....spot on. You go ahead and try responding to your upchain in that tone and tenor. See ya! Btw, the right to free speech only applies to infringement by a governmental entity, not a private company. And most states are "at will". In other words, the company WILL dictate to you, you WILL comply or you WILL be out the door. It's not right, it's not fair, but it is LEGAL!
That's why it's generally up to you to create your own.
Forward emails to your personal accounts, record conversations, etc
And obviously don't tell them that you're doing this.
They will try and use company policy against you to silence you if you let them know that you're doing it,
But the truth is that it's not actually legal to prevent you from creating your own paper trail.
That's basically interfering with your ability to have your own evidence and therefore interfering with the laws that protect you.
In the event that it came to a legal dispute involving lawyers, it would be considered obstruction of justice.
Or "We're not the government, you absolutely have the right to free speech. We're a private company and we have freedom of association, and as such, we're choosing not to associate with you anymore."
I get a very strong feeling that this is all real shit the actual creator has gone/is going through.
Or was sent in to them by people that dealt with it.
THe actual creator yea... but not the animator. I've seen many of the original videos.
I think the creator has been through this.
Same
Iâm so non-confrontational, but Iâm getting a LOT out of these videos. Itâs helping me organize my thoughts, and get closer to the point where I can stand up for myself at work.
I worked with a Veronica once. The office improved dramatically with her around
I was Veronica, they fired me. When I asked why they said YOU DO NOT FIT INTO OUR WORK STYLE. I didn't work OT, they couldn't never reach me on my days off, there was a click that would be late the bosses friends she hired I'd go find a boss when the clock would be 30/45 mins late.
Just a very oppressive place to work.
I usually quit from the BS far before they got to the point of firing me. đ
â@@Gonecheeninđ
@@meyeah382*clique
I worked with a Veronica too. She was tedious and adversarial and we were all glad when she got fired.
Hahahahahahahaha...."if you want to throw HR under the bus"...hahahahahahahaha!
Yep. It was gold. đ
Yep đđż lol đ
HR is NOT and has never been there to support the employees, THEY ARE MOT YOUR FRIENDS !
They are paid shills by the company, do not talk to them unless you have your lawyer with you.
I just wish you'd show the rest of the clip where he was fired shortly afterwards and escorted out of the building by security
Meanwhile the only reason HR knows about her social media presence is because the boss told themâŠ.boss is full of it.
how did the boss know? did she brag about it? did she spend all her "working hours" on social media? did she ever do any real work?
â@@scottmcshannon6821Veronica fans are less productive workers.
Bosses will stalk employeesâ social mediaâŠ.but to your point, they may argue that her social media is affecting her productivity, or she posted from company equipment on company time, blah blah blah. Freedom of speech is not unlimited.
@@scottmcshannon6821 Based on the Veronica videos I have seen. She completes all assigned work. Then treat the rest of the time as me time.
@@lanceknightmare yeah, many companies hate that. i know when i worked in IS we blocked access to social media for 99% of employees.
hors worked is easy to measure and has long been what is used. for remote workers hours worked is totally useless because it is so easy to fake. they need to pay, at least remote workers, by the amount of work you get done. of course if you get a really difficult task and fail to accomplish it, do you not get paid?
It's the stuttering of the manager for me!!đđđđ
We uh they
Not so much a stutter as an accidental speaking of truth rapidly truncated and replaced with something less revealing.
I feel like this was a conversation that actually happened. Verbatim! đ
Veronica is my hero!
Sheâs all of our heros
Agreed! She rocks!
@therealveronika
I wish I could show the rest of the clip instead of cutting it off where he was fired shortly afterwards and escorted out of the building by security
@@TheTonyEd Get over it.
I work for a Fortune 500 and they have a ARMY of people monotoring social media looking out for employees that "Get out of line".
When working for a F500 I and all my coworkers kept all the supervisors in the company blocked on facebook. Just in case.
Social media isn't a thing on the internet. It's the part of your real life that intersects with the internet. You don't owe it to work to change or forget who you are.
if its off the clock and is not doing anything agaist the company the company should mind their business
lol let me know how that works for you
S
@@Suitsyn so far so hood
Sheâs never named the company in her videos so I donât see why they would need to talk to her. đ€·ââïž
Or, for that matter, herself. We don't know that her real name is Veronica or that she really works in an office. We don't, in fact, know that she is a she. It could be a guy named "Biff" who pumps gas.
Exactly I wouldn't care personally especially as nobody can identify them.
The racists who got fired were because they got identified and the company made the decision not to be affiliated with them. My company required a covid vaccine and the union agreed. People left and some whined but it was common sense for an office that didn't want to have people out sick over it
if they ever fire her though - she would be free to name them. They are worried about a social media backlash from "Veronica's" followers.
"Veronica! Why on earth do you refuse to be the abject coward that I am?"
Turned up at an HR disciplinary hearing a lot of years ago. Allowed to have a companion to help me. The companion was a lawyer. You wouldn't believe how quickly that hearing moved into reverse - they really should have been fitted with beepers.
đ
@@mskay7817
The downside to that episode was that it cost me rather more than I could afford. The upside was I never had to do it again.
@@jackwaycombe dang
đ€Łđ€Łđ€Łshe couldn't bring herself to ask if Veronica has a second.
đđđthat!
Sadly my attorney said " you're an at will employee and they can fire you without any explanation. Just like you have the right to quit at will." The attorney went on to say it's most likely company politics and you'll never get an explanation." Better to be self employed.
at my agency, when I hear the 'at will' employee, it is used to refer to executives. Normal employees have more options with HR.
That may be so but you can still sue them if you can prove that the only reason they fired you was for your speech.
A company can't fire someone for a discriminatory reason... For example because of their race, religion, gender identity, or sexual orientation. I'm pretty sure they can fire someone for their speech though. The first amendment doesn't apply to private businesses, only to the government. So, like when people get fired because of viral Karen videos for example... That would be getting fired for speech. If an employer found out an employee was posting a bunch of pro-Nazi stuff on social media, I think someone could be fired for that. Free speech does not mean free from the consequences of said speech. Just means that the government can't outlaw it.
â@@Exis247Sure, you can spend the time and money to sue. And you'll never recoup either. Infringement of speech/expression doesn't apply to a private entity.
@@Exis247 you cannot, your 'Right to Free Speech' is only protected from government action. You could sue the government if they put you in jail for your speech, or you were given a fine for your speech or something to that extent. But a private employer can just say 'I don't like what you say' and fire you for that reason and it is 100% legal. You can be fired for political opinions, having a bad haircut or really many other reasons, as long as it's not race/gender/medical/military/.
All the talk on the internet of 'Oh that employer better watch out you have to call a lawyer and get a big payday' is just useless power fantasy. That's not how the law works. There are very few worker protection laws in the USA and until those laws are changed or added to, then employers have the upper hand.
Now, you might be able to (especially if you are a person with very sought after skills) get a job with a special contract that allows you to have certain rights, which could be legally binding, but I think the vast majority of people will not have that.
Veronica must have a union job because most jobs in at-will states can fire you for ANYTHING as long as itâs not discrimination against a protected class.
Wrongful termination can also a very costly battle for the companyâŠâŠand lawyers only need to show intent of wrongful termination to get a huge settlement for clients.
â@waytoocoolforme ...rarely will you get a settlement or a lawyer that'll take a wrongful termination case. You're probably thinking of a "back-pay" or compensation case they are different.
Im
From NY. This soundd like its a NY company
â@@waytoocoolforme the number of wrongful termination court cases that result in a 'huge settlement' for their clients is a tiny minuscule fraction of the ones that result in their clients spending a lot of money for nothing. At best you might get backpay for the time you were fired, but even that is going to very rarely happen.
And keep in mind, the whole time you are in that court battle, you will be unemployed- and if you are in the process of suing your employer, or sued your employer in the past it WILL come up in a background check and will be a major red flag for hiring in the future.
In the USA our laws protect very very few workers rights, and until those laws are changed there is very little that we can do from a legal standpoint. But then look at our politicians and look at the voting base. Our laws aren't getting any better any time soon.
Well Veronica is female _and_ Latina, so she's covered there...
HR can be an improvement over an uncontrolled manager but they are always a companyâs first line of legal defense.
I canât wait until the algorithm blesses you.
"Veronica" has been used by so many YT accounts at this point I have no idea who the original poster was.
But ... but ... but . I'm your MANAGER. I'm GOD and you are a little peasant who must bow and scrape when I walk past ...
The power trip of every newly-promoted supervisor
Veronica has the manger speaking in BUFFERING đ€Łđ€Łđ€Łđ€Łđ€Łđ€Łđ€Ł PURE 100â€â€ITđ€Łđ€Łđ€Łđ€Łđ€Łđ€Łđ€Łđ€Łđ€Ł
đđđ
I wish they would show the rest of the clip where he was fired right after
Veronica is savage!!
My father told me that my grandfather kept a negative file on every employee, so he would always have good reason to fire anyone he needed too.
Try this in the real world however, and they will find a way to fire you, and black list you if used as a reference. But, it would be sooooo nice!!!!
1. Scare them badly enough and they will be afraid to fire you, because they know that you know your rights and you'll fight back. If you are generally a good employee and they merely wanted to threaten you to make you compliant, they will probably think it's easier to just make sure you don't get promoted and keep you than to let you go and risk you getting angry about it.
2. Never, ever use a former employer as a reference. Even if you think they are going to be good, they may stab you in the back or blindly say something that makes you sound bad. Always get someone you worked with there who likes you to act as a peer reference. Far more predictable, and they're not likely to do the things that will scare away an employer.
my youtube feed is full of veronica videos for some reason and i'm happy for it
Usually Veronica is on point but this time she made a mistake. A company cannot violate your first amendment rights. They can violate labor laws, they can be guilty of discrimination, retaliation is also illegal but not your 1st amendment rights. Your first amendment rights can only be violated by the government.
Your employer can tell you what you can or can't post on social media and you are under no legal obligation to do what they say. This can get you fired and you might possibly have a wrongful to termination lawsuit but not a 1 amendment lawsuit.
The first Amendment and other's we refer to as "rights" are not given to us by the Constitution, the Constitution lays out that the government legally cannot violate those rights and has an obligation to protect them. The rights exist separate from the government and so other entities can still violate them. Referring to those rights by the amendment that outlines what they are is just a shorter way of stating them. Free speech for example can be misconstrued in its meaning while saying First Amendment is more precise. As you've stated violating Rights can lead to consequences for non-governmental entities as the government has an obligation to protect those rights.
Because of this I do not see Veronica as being wrong in the way you seem to infer.
@@bregenoranthoran1820 the first amendment only protects your speech from the government, there for a business can't violate your free speech rights.
For example I can cuss at and call a police officer derogatory names and aside of running a foul of disturbing the peace laws I can't be arrested or fined for cussing at and calling that police officer names . On the other hand business have code of conduct policies and cussing at and calling a coworker derogatory names absolutely can get me fired from that work place and it is in no way a violation of my first amendment rights.
Like wise I can post and say what ever I want on social media and not have any fear of being arrested (with a few exceptions) but the social media platform is well with in their right ban me from their platform for conduct they consider unacceptable and that is not a violation of my first amendment rights, also my employer can decide they no longer want to employ mee based on my social media conduct and that again is not a violation of my first amendment rights.
So yes in these scenario where her employer is asking her to delete her post there is no first amendment violation and Veronica threatening to sue over it is wrong.
@@thisfool89 Actually, if Veronica's social media is about worker's rights or discussions that are protected speech of workers (forming a union for example), then it could fall into it.
Also, Veronica states she's not violating company social media policy, which means the company has a policy and as such is bound to that policy. The company can change the policy, but as of now, Veronica hasn't violated it. The manager is actually wrong here.
Veronica is also wrong in that freedom of speech doesn't apply to private companies. She's making the wrong argument.
@@werefrogofassyria6609 ok bud your last paragraph is my entire point.
@@bregenoranthoran1820 Veronica can not be forced to curb her speech online, but if her boss doesn't like her content, he can fire her unless she has a contract laying out restrictions to online content that she has violated.
free speach protects us from government censorship, not corporate censorship.
Sounds like the only person who has a problem with it is the boss.
Donât start none, wonât be none. Lol!
Period.
It's really amazing how some companies think they own employees body and soul.
true
I truly wish they'd show the rest of the clip where she was fired shortly afterwards and escorted out of the building by security
None of these vids have ever mentioned WHERE she works.
Does it really matter? These days, just about all companies are like that.
Does it really matter? She's just doing a general representation of the soul-sucking US corporate culture
I'm assuming you were referring to the part in the video where the manager said she's putting the company in a bad light. Which, how could she be if she never mentioned where she works.
In which case, great point.
Its a cartoon
@@silverhammer7779For legal purposes yes. If they want to do anything to her about it, they have to prove she blasting the company specifically. Which they canât.
Or, as I call my HR rep, "Hot and Ready." He's amused by that.
Manager should have never given a heads up. Should have just let HR take care of a situation like this. If this was just a scare tactic from the manager then it obviously failed and Veronica should contact HR herself. And depending on what state she lives in or what she signed when she got hired, she can definitely be fired for social media presence that harms the company.
And then file suit for wrongful termination and let a court or an arbitrator decide if and how Veronica's media presence "harms the company" and to what, if any, extent.
â@silverhammer7779 depends on the state.
At will states (every state besides montana) can fire you for any reason (except an illegal one, or for no reason).
You, just as well as I, means you could get fired for dang near anything.
You could spin up a wrongful termination, but that's a huge financial burden on the filer.
â@@TwitchyHarp unfortunately that's very true.
@@TwitchyHarpIts already illegal to fire someone for informing others of their rights. In fact, itâs one of the big no-noâs the triggers an investigation into the company.
If they fire her for the videos, itâs an easy lawsuit. Telling people their rights, in any way, does not hurt a company in any way the law considers legal.
When HR wants to see you theyâre never going to tell you what itâs about until they already did their dirt.
Bring your lawyer to the meeting Veronica
Itâs so weird that people donât understand that their social media presence can in fact impact their employment status.
Fight the power. HR can suck it!
Yeah, suck it HR! Wait, what? What do you mean by âYay, one less check to signâ?!?
Lmao "social media presence" đđđđ
I ran for congress and I have many views that donât align with the programs my company supports. I was very blunt on my stance in certain areas. Of course, I made my profession known in my campaign, but I never mentioned my employers by name. I never received so much as a call from HR or upper management. I enjoy my career and enjoy going to work. I am very proud to be working for my employer and thankful for the opportunities they give me. I am so thankful for the mutual respect we showed each other even though some ideas didnât align.
HR will throw the manager under the bus and back up if they are contacted by her lawyerđđđ
HR: The Force is strong in this one.
There are a few people on the planet who never lose arguments. Gate Agents, Umpires and HR people.
lol HR loses arguments all the time it's called case law lol ...
Just make sure you have your phone on record in your pocket--even if it's not necessarily legal in your state. They really don't like knowing you have a personal record.
California's Labor Board wins arguments and the loser is HR.
@@swatbwanaProof?
@@user-dg5zf4it8cLol, no it isnât. And you know that, gammon.
Yes Veronicađčđčđčđčwe have a right to free speech â€â€â€â€â€
Yes, but that right has nothing to to with private businesses and your job. Freedom of Speech means you can't be imprisoned by the government for your speech. But you can most certainly be fired for it.
As an HR student in Canada, I have seen social media stop some from getting an interview đź
Some companies have new hires sign a 1-3 page policy on internet use & social media practices đ”âđ«
@@vanessapatterson3129 Yeah but canada...lol is not really a free country anymore since 2020. So...there is that.
You do not, in fact, have a right to say anything you like and *stay employed*. An employer can definitely fire you for using your free speech. Your "right to free speech" only means "the government can't put a gun to your head and tell you that you're not allowed to say that" - literally nobody else can violate that right. The moment anyone starts screaming "free speech!" for anything else, I know they don't know what they're talking about. An employer has certain limits of what speech they're allowed to fire you for, but generally if you go around saying "My favorite color is blue" they are allowed to fire you and say that because their logo is green they feel you are telling people that their logo isn't beautiful. If an employer decides that your "free speech" isn't pleasing to them and fires you, they are not violating your rights. You still have every right to say what you want and go work for someone else who doesn't mind it.
Veronica would have a much better argument to say that courts have found that an employee has the legal right to tell others what their rights are, and she didn't even mention what her real name is, what she really does for work, her actual gender, or where she works (we don't know that she is a woman named Veronica that does office work, she could be a guy named Ralph who is a mechanic and has a woman who does voice acting for him for the videos), so if they let her go that would probably be illegal retaliation against her for lawfully telling others about their rights.
Free speech only applies to government regulation. A lawyer wouldn't really do anything in this scenario as free speech laws do not really apply to a private business unless it violates a very specific labor law.
"You can easily lose your job if you said something in an online forum that insulted your boss, the company you work for, or a co-worker. You can also be terminated if you expressed an opinion online that goes against your employer's image."
Getting your lawyer involved does not alter that. It just drags it out. Meanwhile, you're still fired.
Depends on the state. Not all states are at will... Some companies, the hr policy is so around to terminate an employee, they may be placing themselves into trouble by not following their hr policy... And an attorney is probably more capable of determining if they engaged in wrong doing.
But... My issue with this code is that the first amendment doesn't apply to private companies including upon free speech rights of the employee... As it is only directed at the government.
â@@jdramirez77....ALL STATES except Montana friend. Have a nice day
@@jdramirez77 Your so right about that. 1st amendment speech has no bearing on a private entity. That said, one can criticize companies in general and offer advice on protecting one's workplace rights without mentioning a particular company. That's where people fall down and whine about their 'free speech'.
That "So" at the end was so personal, I LOVE IT
I wish I would show the rest of the clip where she was fired
Start every conversation with HR with "go to hell." It just saves time.
boss got busted
Actually no private company has to respect anyone's right to the freedom of speech. I would stay with you the rest of the video where she was fired and escorted out of the building by security
The real change in Corporate America--where companies stopped rewarding hard workers with raises and promotions, and stopped valuing merit and productivity and seeing those traits as a threat and liability--happened at EXACTLY the same time when they changed the name of the Personnel Department to the "Human Resources" Department.
They stopped viewing their employees as Persons (with loyalty initiative creativity, and feelings), and started seeing them as "resources" (like toner cartridges or desks...)
"We....they..." Hummadehummadehummade.
Go girl! We LUV YOUR videos! Keep posting girl!
Yo! Where are these sound bites coming from? They are hilarious!
Tiktok
instagram.com/reel/C72hA9by31j/?igsh=bmxyZ2tsbTNpdGV3 @therealveronika on ig and tiktok
At 1.01 Veronica is stating that HR or her boss is trying to infringe her right to free speech. But the First Amendment states that âCongress shall make no lawâŠâŠ.abridging the freedom of speechâŠâ (and this also includes state, county or municipal legislatures) it merely protects a personâs freedom of speech from any sanction by any organ of the state. The idea that it protect oneâs freedom from sanction by any private organisation is not true. If one expresses views which are unacceptable to a private organisation or is deemed to bring that organisation into disrepute (eg expressing anti-Semitic views or pro-abortion views) one can be sanctioned or dismissed. The First Amendment does not give one all encompassing freedom of speech. Veronicaâs threats of legal action are actually a bluff.
Very true. Her only argument that might protect her is that she is engaging in protected labor organizing activities. Especially of they are dumb enough to say thst people from work are reading it and therefore its disruptive. At the point where shes encourgaing peope at work to stick up for their rights, it starts getting into thst. Its still kinda sjetchy and i wouldnr wNt to be un the position of having to rely on that to defend myself. But theres probably some meat there. But it might make somone back off. And depending on the situation, it might make somone bavk down. But more likely they would just find a different way to fire her.
I just love these videos!
First rule of thumb, HR is not your friend.
I got chewed out by my manager/HR for not writing my birthday down on a sheet of paper she passed around during a staff meeting. She acted like it was her right to know why I refused to give consent. I told her my reasons were personal, and therefore none of her business. She told me "just so you know, I do all the payroll and have access to that information, so I know it's next week." I told her "just so you know, this conversation should have ended the moment I said I didn't want my employer imposing themselves in my personal life, and I'd appreciate it if you'd respect my boundaries." It blows my mind how managers get that little bit of power and think it makes them the ruler of every aspect of their subordinates' lives.
Social media has really tainted the work place and not for good. I read an article saying you don't stop being an employee after your shift ends and questionable behavior can hurt the company based on what you post on social media. Well if they expect me to represent the company 24/7 i should be paid 24/7. If i do legal thing regardless of how it's viewed it shouldn't be the company's business. Even if i binge drink or something and I'm acting legally they should stay out of it. The mentality of when will this start effecting your work shouldn't be a factor. Thats like saying well you are going to die one day and leave us hanging so we shouldn't hire you. Companies have termination policies in place. If you make a bad decision you can just terminate and move on. Don't hire based on the fact this may not work out years down the road.
This isn't a social media thing. Companies could ALWAYS do this. If they saw you marching for Civil Rights you could get fired. If you participated in an anti Vietnam war demonstration you could get fired. No nukes rally? FIRED! Of course, it works the other way too. White power march? FIRED.
Social media has just made it easier for (1) People to express their opinions (or act like idiots) and (2) For the entire world, their employer included, to see those opinions (or actions).
Freedom of Speech does not equal Freedom from Responsibility.
Every one of these videos reminds me of my previous employer.
And the crowd rejoiced!!! đđ„ł đđđđđđđđđđđ
"Why would my videos hurt our company?"
These videos are brilliant!! The character of Veronica is perfection! đđđđđ
Apparently Veronica is based on a real person. Look up "Customer Service Academy."
so very , very true with big companies......
Screamingggggg đđđđđđđđđŸđđŸđđŸđđŸ
I used to work for a city government and there were a total of six people besides myself in our department. When my lazy, imperious manager kept harassing and threatening me and giving me a hard time, I reported her to HR and requested an investigative meeting with HR and her own manager. There was a TON of work about to be due that had to be turned in to the state government. After the meeting, she gave me a negative annual review and I resigned immediately. I saw all the tears on my coworker's eyes because one of my coworkers retired a few days before, and another one was about go on maternity leave. They were understaffed and no one was able to do their job and mine as well.
''This isn't an attack on you''
I †Veronica!!! đ đ đ
A private company can take action against any employee that directly, or indirectly disrupts company goals. That includes the bottom line of making money.
Get em girl! Make sure to send a follow up email
Veronica for president
They can't do nothing with Veronica đđ
but get rid of here. When they get tired of here crap all the time.
P: Veronika, what time is it?
V: You don't have no watch?
P: No I....
V: Well go get a watch, Its not my job to give you the time!
Every single time for every little thing veronika is a PITA.
I'm not a lawyer, but the First Amendment WOULD NOT APPLY HERE. America's right to free speech is a defense against the U.S. government censoring or retaliating against you - it has nothing to do with what private corporations may or may not do with regard to your speech.
I cringe anytime people say "my free speech rights!" when talking about non-govt related things.
Oh my đđ Iâm rolling
This is when HR changes the company policies.
Bruh, girl could scare hockey players off the ice.
It is amazing how many workdrones miss the point of Veronica
Her point is still wrong, regardless of your feelings on it.
I so hope Veronica had her lawyer look over her work contract. Some places actually include a no social media clause. Not sure how legal that is, but I've seen it.
As soon as Veronica mentioned her attorney I could almost hear her manager farting in her pants as she almost lost her shit.
Good luck not getting fired. I had my HR call me about my beliefs.
I don't like that you're right about that. And I'm sorry they felt like they could tell you how to believe. Control freaks.
Me put my social media profit empty:
The âIâm not breaking any social media policyâ is going to end up getting companies to state upfront that if you want the job, you canât have any social media. Tread carefully.
These are seriously from true events!! I love them!
My heroine!
If a company wants to fire you, theyâll find a way! You clocked in at 8:01 twice this week? We have to let you go!
They wonât provide the real reason, because that information could be used against the company in a wrongful termination lawsuit. Theyâll just use the ole âDue to the needs of the company âŠâ platitudes.
So, in this state:
Employer: You clocked in at 8:01 twice this week? You're fired.
Court: Why did you fire them?
Employer: They were late twice.
Court: Show us the employee handbook that the employee had access to or a signature from the employee acknowledging that they were informed this was their designated time to arrive at work.
Employer: Uh... uh...
Court: Show us evidence of when you had a meeting with them to tell them there was a problem.
Employer: Uh... uh...
Court: Show us where you put them on a probationary period and told them what was wrong and what the consequences are, and their signature acknowledging that you did so.
Employer: Uh... uh...
Court: Show us evidence that they were late.
Employer: Uh... uh...
Court: Sounds like it was wrongful termination. We find for the employee. Damages awarded are 100% of the employee's income for up to 3 years or whenever they get a new job.
Most employees won't take it that far. But if an employer is making threats over minor stuff and the employee says "you will be hearing from my lawyer about this," the employer knows that the employee is not going to take it lightly, and it's in their best interests to not fire the employee as long as they are generally okay at their job.
Veronica overlooks the most important lesson. She will never get promoted.
Maybe she doesn't care.
Maybe she knows that a person is far more likely to get promoted by getting a higher level job somewhere else and changing jobs than by applying for a promotion at their current employer.
Well, if she never gets promoted she can move on. The important thing is to stand up for yourself and know what YOUR rights are as an employee. I wish they had veronika when I was in the workforce.
âWeâ turns to âtheyâ quite a few times on the managerâs side.
Taking notesâ€â€â€â€
Better have your ducks in a row when you come at Veronica wit dat chit.
How would HR even know? I have never seen anything identifiable to a specific company or person, as far as I know even the Veronica name is fictitious, the characters are stick figures. I just want to know what paranoid manager sees these videos and then asks the employee if this is them?
I've filled out job applications that demand to know what all your social media account names are, and you'd better have some because if not they will say you're lying and not hire you. (So I give them the name of one of my accounts where almost everything is private, so you can see I'm there, but only friends can see what I say.)
@@tmf866 Who knows, maybe Veronica can make something on this. I haven't had any employers ask me for my social media presence/account names. They have let me know that if something should come up they would investigate for any mentions of who I worked for or mentions of other employees and that could become grounds for dismissal. Fine by me, never talk about them, no problems.
Leave while he's not there
I think I might have woke my neighbor up when a very loud and happy "FUCK YEAH!" escaped my mouth as I was watching this. As such you will be hearing from my lawyer.
.
.
.
.
.
Joking... about the lawyer part. My neighbor's kid is a whiny brat.
Never mess with Veronica
At will employment says that they could fire her for simply talking back during that interaction
Ha ha đ the manager is awkward
We all know what 2 words she wanted to ad at the end.đ
An actual company wouldn't bother setting up a meeting with HR, or even mention anything about the online presence of the employee. She'd just find herself being "laid off", permanently.
My 'only' challenge with this is trying to use "Free Speech"
With the assumption she is a USA employee, the right to "Free Speech" is only protected against Government attempting to limit the individual. So unless "Veronica" works for a government agency, the Corporation can place employment restrictions on her speech.
With that said, it better VERY CLEARLY lay those conditions out in her contract. As we know, from other videos, Veronica KNOWS her contract and will even offer you a copy.
"So, you've clearly been _watching_ my videos, right?" "...I mean, yeah..." "Okay, and how many times have I ever brought the company up _by name_ in any of these videos? How many people in the world even know where I work?" "... ... ..." "That's right. None. I think we're done here."
Some employers have already tried to end run around this claiming all your time can effect them.
Veronica was then given a series of write ups over the course of three weeks for âimproper conductâ over trivial matters that were legally permissible before being let go. Never talk to your higher ups in a corporate job like this, because their pettiness knows no bounds and if you arenât cooperative, as crappy as the practice is, they will gut out members of the team they believe will inconvenience them.
Bad guys doesn't like it when they get called out.
Unless Veronica works for the government (federal, state, or local) the first amendment doesn't apply as it protects one from the government infringing upon free speech. However, what she does say that's applicable is that it doesn't violate the companies policy on social media.
The manager knows she is screwed. LOL
I wish they'd show the rest of the clip where she was fired escort out of the building by security
I never can understand how one can call in sick and post their dinner and concert on Facebook!!!