Racial Differences and the Evolutionary Reasons for Them
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 09. 2024
- / discord Please consider supporting this channel: / australianrealist
A classic race realist speech given by J Philippe Rushton.
Full Debate: • JP Rushton and David S...
This is from 1989 when freedom of speech was still allowed on college campuses.
And when in Toronto 3% of population was Black.
Its amazing that someone like Rushton used to be able to do that without getting shouted out.
I think thirty years ago the students knew that if they shouted and yelled at a speaker-professor they would be promptly removed from the audience and condemned by their peers. Gradually over the years it seems students have been given greater “ freedoms” to interrupt if the “feel threatened” and greater support from unions of “sensitive” students.
Students are out of control due to all these woman and black studies type courses preaching extreme nonsense.
They also are letting in students under affirmative action which allows them to get into schools they’re not qualified for. This causes an inferiority complex and anger especially from black woman.
Instead of going to a school that more fits their capabilities they go to ones where they fail out and where the students are living rich and pampered lives. This caused jealousy and resentment. You also have a lot of whites and now Asians that are getting pissed that they don’t get these handouts and realize they didn’t get in but others do w much less qualifications.
Especially since it’s by such a small amount that it’s within statistical error.
Every time the blacks heckle him they're just proving his point about no restraint.
I was just thinking the same thing! Lol
They are loud, lack a sense of distinction between the public and private spheres or what ever are public and private spheres, and do not abide by social conventions.
fiakuma29 yeah can you show me anywhere they do it in this kind of a setting ?
fiakuma29 Facts are known to be mean.
fiakuma29 boo boo snowflake
Quiet crowd for a contentious subject, imagine this being done today on a US university campus.
bob gates ......this presentation would not be permitted to occur at all. Free speech is a myth.
This happened in the days of more appropriate structure, less informal, basic consideration for speakers to air ideas.
@Anonymous
"We"?
Whatchu talkin 'bout, rayciss?
it would literally be a zoo
I'm black, I'll prove to everyone blacks aren't wild and often unable to practice self control BY SCREAMING LOUDLY AT SOMEONE I DON'T SHARE THE SAME OPINION WITH, that'll show 'em.
@NowA NevA Take music they are better performing in public. A white is typically a bathroom baritone outside he is more restrained. It has nothing to do with temper.
Facts are facts
Dindos didin do nofin
That's not the point..............when you deal with large scale populations of nations the functionality and potential of that nation must be factored by the analysis of the majority percentage of a given group or in this case race and its impact on that society. In that light, the majority percentage of Whites and Asians demonstrate cognitive skill sets and behavior capable of constructing a functional society, while the majority of Blacks lack that potential..........a given Black outlander to the right of the mean in standard deviation that would put them on par with the functionality of Whites or Asians is too small a percentage of the Black race to excuse the rest of their race's failure to assimilate to modern 1st world social functionality.
1 Billion people blacks
If this had been done in 2017 the blacks would have rioted and beat him within an inch of his life.
Quite Ironic, really. 'Tis very true though.
or been shot
Moviestar Memories Not only that but intersectional feminists would've been triggered to no end.
Or 1970, 84, 88, 90, 99 ,2015 through 2019. The last 2000's dates would be assisted by antifa.
The libtard whites would join in the beating. And then the blacks would beat the libtard whites.
Why does it always take a study to point out the obvious?
Some truths are self-evident.
Which are ultimately violently shouted down by the race that finds itself perpetually on the bottom of the heap, their shrieks supported by the race in the middle, all the while the race at the top continues to work on their computer programming skills.
@humbuckerpickups
It is the difference between ANECDOTAL and QUANTIFIABLE EVIDENCE:
'common sense' should have people able to observe general patterns;
FINE GRAIN studies of a phenomena and explanations of how it works and pointing out the subtleties.
..because we've been programmed not to believe anything unless "experts" tell us it's true.
Modern men were bred by the elites to be this way, it won't change
Mr Rushton has true courage! to stand up and defend truth in front of a herd of hostile Marxist zombies proves true integrity. he is a man to be admired. Rest in peace Mr. Rushton.
Rushton has done more than provide proof for this thesis. He has redeemed social science as an ethical, measurable, and relevant area of study. The majority of social science promoted by universities is a bunch of marxist junk designed to keep "minorities" and feminists happy, with no testable hypothesis. Rushton will be remembered in the years to come.
+mdssdp Amen. He has BALLS!
Just living in the U.S taught me who had lower intelligence
When they import slaves, they never thought of impact to the society. Slavery was a stupid idea, from everyone's point of view.
Read "The Bell Curve". It relates the logical differences between "brown" African Americans and "black" Africans. You can guess which fared better.
@@wwaynemcg
There's 2 different Races of African American ? Brown and Black ?
@@arunanarina1316 No, I never claimed that. It's clear that African-Americans, with some caucasian blood, are more brown and not as black as Africans. But since you bring it up, propensity towards violence follows a predictable line; from black to brown, then from brown to white, perhaps even to yellow (Asians).
@@wwaynemcg
Oh Ok I see Thanks Bud
What is your background Bud ?
Are you White, Yellow, Brown or BLM ?
The sooner we accept these scientific facts about the races, the sooner we can begin solving our rampant social problems.
paul Duboise I think this will get us well on the way to solving all problems including poverty and inequality.
With the current mindset implementing this would mean war
Inequality is deseriable as those who are better should have more due to their greater intrinsic value and often greater achievements as well. @@danielcannon8184
Accepting these scientific facts seems to equate to promoting racism by the commoner's standards.
Look at 50% of the comments on this video. Racism is thick here. Many of the people "accepting scientific fact" are doing so to boost their fragile egos. Many of them merely want to spread hatred and inequality; to find some group of people to mock for their entertainment.
The scientific, psychological, and economic communities are taking such information and actually studying it. Regular joes like you and I are half-assedly taking any information to promote a race war, point the finger of blame, or worst of all oversimplify the problem. Many of the racist here commenting have no solution beyond mass genocide and abusive caste systems implemented by Hitler or other tyrants in history. But I guarentee if the highest IQ Asian nations implemented such bigotry, these same racist commenters would be crying about oppression and inhumanity and how their lives are worth something and how they helped the world etc.
These facts can never be accepted. In fact, we see them being suppressed and outright denied now. Everywhere.
Firstly, I am amazed that CZcams hasn't removed this, but thankful they haven't. - yet. Secondly, I cannot imagine how uncomfortable this data and hypotheses must make the vast bulk of the academy (or indeed, just the majority progressive left that governs the western world). And thirdly, that it shouldn't be uncomfortable - it should be examined and embraced as a route to understanding and solving the issues western societies face.
So many truth bombs here. It is like a chain nuclear reaction.
Facts can be so non PC. The truth sometimes hurts.
Klaus K. O'Holahand facts are racist!
Teaching people that we are all the same breeds hate and anger, when the outcomes are not the same.
Speech is Violent To Keep You Silent
We aren't all the same. And it's breed, not bread.
@@barbaravick5634 Thank you!
Marxist teachers deliberately hamstring the white boys in an attempt to create equality of outcome.
Try this at Berkley now
Better luck blowing a homeless dude in front of a lecture hall
klippiesss Berkeley. Lol
Berkeley is all Asian now (2019)
I do not remember listening to such a rigorous, emotionless presentation on race. Amazing and clear. This man is really all about facts. Who can argue but a brainwashed ideologue? Facts over feelings, not the other way around.
Look up Jared Taylor of American Renaissance.
What do you do with these facts? Is it an excuse to continue racism?
@@jasonwiley798Raise awareness of the importance of racial preservation
Academic debates like this cannot be done today through the threat of violence or thecomplete ostracization of the speaker. We are living in dark times ...
I knew this without looking at any studies! 12 years in public schools makes all Americans know these facts whether they'll admit it or not.
Crime data has shown this glaring fact for decades, so it ought not be news.
Super facts!
None of this would be controversial if Whites and Blacks simply lived apart.
But then who would take care of blks? Even African countries ask just short of obligate European countries and Russia for handouts
The very people who needed extra points bestowed upon them by Affirmative Action will argue they are as smart as everyone else.
They also argue that all of their problems come from white privilege which is why white people need to stop placating these people and tell them the truth.
This could never ever ever be said on a public platform today 2019 , your career would be ended you would vilified and your reputation and career ended immediately.....thank you for posting this ...it was very interesting to listen to ...
His career was indeed ended and he continues to be vilified to this day. Just look at his Wikipedia page
He look's like Clark Kent the "Superman".
He's an aryan superman.
Exactly my first thoughts.
Asians are smart and passive. Whites are attractive and assertive. Blacks are strong and aggressive.
you would be arrested for saying this here in England
This man isn't saying anything mean spirited towards anyone. He is simply citing facts and statistics. Yet he still gets accused of being a "racist". Incredible.
Well technically he is a racist. Whether he's right or wrong is besides the point.
When you can't win an argument just use name calling. Kevin Samuels would say over and over again 'Men built the world you live in, show us respect!' I would laugh 'Name me one black African empire which shaped out modern world then? I don't think he has any data then to counter that.
No he is also drawing conclusions form these facts.
If they are actually facts.
@@jasonwiley798 They are facts
You can physically feel the discomfort in the audience and this was in the 80's, imagine this today :D
Don't you just love watching the uncomfortable clock watching and shifting in their chairs?
He's actually very reasonable and gives credit to "Orientals" for being the brightest group....and it does appear that a few members of the audience have a problem with impulse control lol
When he uses the archaic academic term “orientals” what he really means are East Asians. Japanese, Korean and Chinese are the people he’s referring to.
East Asians is a better and more precise term. Also, I don’t like the way British people use the term “Asian“ to describe people from India or Pakistan. It’s imprecise. “South Asian”is more precise..
Imagine this on today's campus! Throw in women vs men and you'll have outright riots."My feelings don't care about your facts"- to bastardize a phrase.
Very observant! Far too many taboos within the educational industrial complex. The propaganda line is "we are all the same". B.S.
I love the way people, although possibly offended by the facts, are able to sit and lisyen, make up their own minds, and either agree or disagree peacefully with few outbursts. This was a more civilized time in our public discourse.
Few outbursts. Haha. There should have been none, negro.
I'm a teacher at a trade school in midtown Manhattan. In my latest evening class, I had one Asian student. That student did better than both the blacks and whites. He took more detailed notes and carefully chose the questions which he asked.
Hey that's Oriental didn't you hear the man... it's not Asian it's Oriental! I think Oriental sounds a lot better than Asian when I hear the word Asian I think of gang members!
You are right....I had my Asian friends crunch the numbers.
@@kingt.hawkings32 that is just silly, sure your not being a little prejudice or least to say, presumptuous? Surely not all "Asians" or people who Consider them self "Asian" are Gangsters
;)
@@kingt.hawkings32 when I hear asian I think of chinese food. When I hear oriental i think of a 19th centiry dunna dunna dunna dun dun dun gong type shit long braided slant eyes pounding in rail road spikes on the union pacific. Lets stay with Asian
However I do respect the eloquence of the late Professor Rushton.
Moreover his articulation is spot on.
and everything he says has only been reconfirmed in the decades since
You could come to this conclusions just by looking at what happened at the super dome in New Orleans during Katrina
Compare that to how Japanese behave after Tohoku earthquick.
Hmm...could be insulting for some races...but if it is true we have to accept the fact
@T Taa nailed it
I agree, we must accept our differences and form society based on that. Some races are smarter than others, it's a fact.
I don't know people overall are more stupid these days they care more about the feelings getting hurt rather than facts.
@@PKPK-rr3rs Ethnostate ? Lol That will NEVER happen
_+Anon Ymous_
Yes, an Ethnostate. My country belongs to my people, other races should not be permitted to live in my home. This is the land where my ancestors bled and died, it’s the home of my people and my people alone.
All of this helps to explain why East Asians do so well at school and have higher measure of social harmony, are healthier and have greater longevity. Problem is...their lower reproductive rate due to greater sexual restraint and other factors. So the world's most intelligent people living in Hong Kong and Singapore have the world's lowest fertility rate of about 0.8 while the world's least intelligent peoples have reproductive rate of about 6.5 (spray and pray).
Speedy Gonzales it seems like nature has a way of balancing things out. Intelligence is both advantages and not advantages.
hong kong n singapore have capitalism not high iq
Don't worry about that as the Chinese have over a billion people and they are oriental/East Asian in genetic make-up.
@@gavinschuette9826 its high IQ bruh, look it up
@@komradewirelesscaller6716 aging population
As an Oriental, I agree totally.
john lee honary
That's why I'm turning Japanese, I think I'm turning Japanese. I really think so.
You agree? Are you a research scientist too or are you just pleased with the results?
@@martinmaltbor9390 us Asians just study hard .-.
It was OK to say Oriental also in 1989. Today you'll be stoned if you don't say "Asian" It will be blacks who call you racist, (while they beat up an Asian for being smarter than they are!"
Well presented and well argued. No heat, just light.
I was kind of looking forward to Suzuki's irrational, emotional, utterly non-scientific tantrum at the end, but I can always find that elsewhere. Thanks!
Well done, Aussie Realist, in leaving out Suzuki. I've seen this before, and Suzuki simply starts calling for Rushton to be kicked out of academia as a kook. He totally refuses to debate. A default win by Rushton.
Suzuki shamed all Japanese with his conducts. Apology to Dr. Rushton.
I agree but in regards to political culture, Suzuki won in the end as he got his way and his leftist colleagues followed his advice. This only forces the debate into the streets where fists, guns, and child bearing will determine the victor. It's ironic that these leftists are accelerating the inevitability of violence with their censorship and mass migration policies as it leaves whites little choices: submission, deporting enemies, or ethnic cleansing one way or the other.
Everyone in this room knows Rushton is right. They just don't like hearing about it.
Being right doesn't make you popular
@@dbabini1 Bring popular doesn't make your views good for society.
Rushton speaking here mentions Gould, who was always arguing the egalitarian position for the left; and that brain size studies were flawed. However Gould was caught falsifying his data to support his egalitarian arguments. Colleges and civil service examination creators hired black psychologists and sociologists to flush out the racial bias in their exams. However, try as they might, the breakdown of those test results was again just as Rushton mentions. Finally, cities and colleges just started giving blacks extra points for being black and considered that the solution.
Notice that Suzuki was completely speechless. He had NOTHING to rebut these facts.
That's a lie. Suzuki spent about 9 minutes refuting Rushton and exposed numerous absurdities in his work during the rebuttal period.
Although I support Rushton's hypothesis, it is clear that Suzuki's rebuttal is NOT included here. It is concerning that the poster declined to include it.
All that Suzuki did was hurl insults.
It took me awhile to realize who Suzuki was. He is considered the wise man and hosts many shows.
Suzuki shamed all Japanese with his conducts. Apology to Dr. Rushton.
It's Clark Kent!
or Seymour Krelborn from "Little Shop of Horrors". "Suddenly, Seymour is standing beside you"
Facts don't care about your feelings. And the yelling out isn't helping their reputation for self control
Didn't see many black folk clapping at the end. LOL
@big poppa Wakanda 4evah ✊🏿
Serving Coffee and Bananas
More than thought provoking.
We all know this deep down inside. Regardless of what lies are told by all sides. Everyone has something to offer. To say that everyone has everything to offer, is ignorant.
Weird how people get upset when all he is doing is reading the data from the findings. People have a hard time accepting that there are differences in races.
Can't change facts with protest. Nice to watch a quiet lecture.....unlike today!
*It is so outlandish and wicked to simply state that this is precisely the reason why we need to balkanize the US and just live with our own people?* It worked for Sudan. Just let each race with their own kind and pursue their own future; this is how the world has been for thousands of years. Is this really so "extremist?"
There is an argument that the majority of black people in the USA were not voluntary immigrants to that land. The white Europeans made a conscious effort to populate the USA.
That remark is just an observation, and neither agrees nor disagrees with the data. If it is as scientific as it is claimed to be, then it will stand up for itself.
Nobody should be either surprised or annoyed by statistics that seem to be borne out by observable situations.
Weren't African-Americans given Liberia? I'm not certain that many took America up on the offer of "return".
@@stephenbrookes7268 so they earned the right to pillage ? They didn't even work that hard under slavery and the production numbers tell us this
@@wwaynemcg It was Sierra Leone that was offered by the British for Americans of African ancestry, whom desired to move to Africa. Very small numbers took up the offer, and many migrated to Liberia and other parts of the continent. Surely this must show that most Americans, that had been slaves, felt that American was their home. I guess we all have an affinity with the soil upon which we were born. Regardless of its adversities. We are, if nothing else, a very hopeful species.
Good luck to us all on this weird spinning ball.
Fascinating! The world will gradually come to understand this, just as we have been for centuries.
Asian are the way of the future for humanity. Good for them. It doesn't bother me.
Yes, intelligence isn't the only factor. While Asians are slightly higher average IQ they don't exactly have a temperament for challenging the status quo as caucasian people do, which drives the progression of civilization.
Eric Hansen or maybe Europeans had the backing of an entire enslaved continent and its resources??
There are many kind of Asians. High IQ does not mean high morals.
Asians lack innovation, creativity and strength
I want similar data comparing men with women, also telling us something useful about LGBTQ?
Lbgabcdefg,thats all we need another group to get on the victim wagon
@Eric Hansen i beg to differ on the good decisions in family matters.
Solving a problem comes with understanding the problem.
Clark Client was doing some unapproved research
interesting and thought provoking, these are scientific facts and should not be suppressed.
i looked it up and black countries are at the bottom
So why is this a reason for hate? It is a reason for finding fixes. So everyone can do their best. Not giving up on anyone.
Hence the welfare system so whites and asians can pay for baby mommas to have multiple children from multiple dindu's
Political correctness has made sure no one would ever do this type of talk again. This speech would be booed out of any college in America. That proves one thing. Freedom of speech in this great country no longer exists. Sad. We used to be able to disagree with a crazy idea in a civilized manner. Now you are faced with hate if you don't agree with a bunch of kooks.
.
"Any random woman cannot be taller than any random man." That's stupidly obviously wrong.
"you will not be able to tell which group will have the larger percentage of smart people."
Nearly every IQ test disagrees with you, blacks are nearly always found to be the dumber group.
"There are a million whites and a million blacks. You won't bet your life that the white group will be smarter."
Million random whites, million random black? Yeah, I would bet my life.
does explain the bad behavior by blacks generally where ever you go in the world
1) Teach all Black boys to read at grade level by the third grade and to embrace education.
2) Provide positive role models for Black boys.
3) Create a stable home environment for Black boys that includes contact with their fathers.
4) Ensure that Black boys have a strong spiritual base.
5) Control the negative media influences on Black boys.
6) Teach Black boys to respect all girls and women.
bandwagon22
If you train lifting and cardio and running every day and optimize your diet for muscle development, and I spend every day sitting in a couch and bordering on constant malnutrition, then I'm sure we'd both agree, you'd end up a lot stronger than I would, by whatever measure of strength we chose to compare.
That fact doesn't by itself disprove the notion that you and I have different innate potentials for developing strength.
Similarly, it might be possible to create an environment for American blacks that, on average, allows them to match or exceed the performance of American whites on IQ tests, academic performance, time management skills, some set of indicators of general life success and satisfaction, or some combination of the above.
It's not outright impossible that you could improve the environments in which black people live and are raised to such an extent that they would match or exceed average white performance on some of the above-mentioned tests, especially if a significant portion of the white population were to suffer a concurrent decrease in the quality of their environment.
But what would that really prove?
GiggleHz
You've read me incorrectly, and you're making an incorrect induction.
GiggleHz
The data says that, with the variances that currently exist between real world blacks and whites, any effects of environment are pretty much drowned out by genetic effects.
This doesn't say anything of the totality of all possible, exotic environments we might ever be able to design to boost the scores of one group and tank the scores of another.
Egalitarianjay02
"Take a pair of identical twins and raise them in dramatically different environments and you will get dramatically different results."
I'm sure that's true of some range of exotic environments that we might be able to construct at great expense, but it might or might not be true of any given range of environments that you want to compare in the real world.
I used to think parenting advice was really important, and that applying the scientific method towards teaching people to be better parents could cause a huge, cumulative boost in human well-being, and that my own life outcome could be explained by my familial history. I looked at how middle- and upper-class people spend enormous sums of time, effort and money on giving their children the best possible start in life, and I felt really good about that, even if there had not yet emerged a consensus on which method was the best, and even if the lower classes were as yet lagging behind somewhat.
Then I looked at some twin adoption studies.
And holy. Fucking. Shit.
None of any of the normal things that people do, nothing that is even a part of the debate at this point, predicts any significant portion of the variance in outcomes.
But exerting yourself to give your child the best possible start in life is what good people do, so that's what people will do.
Meanwhile, a tiny group of european jews, making up about half a percent of the world's population, who do culturally value knowledge and study (but not really much more than white or asian intellectual families do by any measure that I can think of, and if they did have an innate disposition, then that disposition would almost certainly cause the observed culture,) were somehow ridiculously overrepresented per capita in recognition for scientific work, including about 25% of the Nobel Prizes in hard sciences granted during the 20th century and numerous prizes in mathematics and programming.
Someone would have thought to study and replicate what they do.
Someone almost certainly has tried that. If nothing else, I'm nearly positive that e.g. the people who run Headstart must have looked at how successful people have been raised, long before they got desperate enough to start intervening at a mere 2 months of age.
But, it's a little like when Einstein gave advice on how to think about physics, or when musical prodigies try to teach mediocre students how to think about music. The advice will resonate very strongly with some very few students who will be greatly helped and inspired by it, but most people just aren't capable of replicating the way that Einstein or Bach visualized the universe.
You've probably experienced this in your own life, if you've gone to school like most people have. Weren't there a few kids in your class who had to work really hard just to pass, and other kids who got good grades while barely even trying? It might be very gratifying for you to think that the only reason you did better than them was because you worked harder, but do you honestly expect expect that there's something you might have done, to make studying as easy for the mediocre students as it was for the gifted ones who just coasted by with no effort?
But all that said, perhaps naïvely, I'm still holding out hope. It's possible that we're just stuck in a local maximum.
Maybe if we allowed much more experimentation with education and child-rearing, and dropped a bunch of licensing- and legal requirements and so on, we could greatly widen the total range of variance. We'd have to accept that a lot of children would be worse off for it, but there's a chance that it might also produce methods that are better than anything we have now.
"I'm glad to see you aren't so totally biased that you can at least acknowledge this."
An organism is a set of genes, expressed in an environment. It's utterly meaningless to make broad, sweeping generalizations about "nature and nurture" in the abstract, because a genome without an environment is nothing but a test tube of chemicals in a lab somewhere, and an environment without a genome is just a dead, lifeless rock.
(And I think the only reason why people do make broad, sweeping generalizations one way or the other is, again, as signalling behaviour, or as belief-in-belief. Most of the shit people say on this subject doesn't even parse out into positive statements that can even be true or false, but they think it and say it and feel it very wise and important anyway, because that's just the sort of thing that good, open-minded people do.)
Though frankly, I kinda devalued your personal opinion of me, when you made that whole argument about "us vs them" and how racists must be opposed at all costs and that. You still remind me a little of an earlier state of myself, but I no longer think that your judgment is a fair test of my character.
Also, your saying that you would continue to support immigration even if you believed that immigrant populations regressed towards less desirable means didn't help.
The question of biological v. cultural heredity isn't even directly relevant to that. The consequences would be the exact same, if it were due to cultural differences which had proven similarly resistant to intervention.
If those consequences to the mean of the total population had been caused by any other thing, then you would recognize a moral good in preventing that damage, even if that moral good has to be balanced against other goods (which is pretty much what I believe; it's a moral good to accept refugees and try to give them better lives, but it is a finite good which must be balanced against other finite goods.)
If it turned out that all factories which produce insulin also release trace amounts of neurotoxin into the air which had subtle but undesirable effects on adolescent brain development within dozens of kilometers, then you would think real hard about how important those two things are to you, and you'd try very hard to come up with good tradeoffs or workarounds.
There is room for virtue ethics, and there is a certain kind of person who DOES need to be reminded that proxy variables constitute a finite amount of evidence, but for goodness' sake:
Simplify your Humanism, Sir!
Epicurus
And what, pay for their upkeep? Make them even less able to contribute to society?
facts don't have feelings as the saying goes
Link to full debate added to description.
I didn't claim there was anything racially different about the Coptic Christians, but (in Egypt) they are a homogenous group who represent Egyptian continuity. Modern Egyptians look very similar to the representations of ancient Egyptians. They are clearly distinct from sub-Saharan blacks of all kinds. They are not Europeans, they are native African, but they are not black. Any attempts to steal their heritage should be resisted, no matter who tries it.
It's very important to spread these facts around the world. VERY IMPRESSED AND THANK YOU FOR NOT BEING AFRAID TO SAY THE TRUTH THAT NOONE WANTS TO HEAR
Shirley Ybarra
Today he’s dead and irrelevant, and people like him are almost nowhere to be found. I guess if this mother*cher was alive today, he would have created a theory to explain the why about LGBT
Please, the term is no one or none no such word as noone guess your spellchecker isn't working.
@@jaredprince4772 or apparently idiocy. There is a reason to point out the use of non words or else we would not have dictionaries. Proper use of language IS important. If you do not realize that, reason is lost to you.
@@limpingoatfarm You can call yourself such things if you like, but I'm only calling you on your pedantry. The purpose of language is to communicate ideas. Pedantry serves no such purpose. If something does serve the purpose to communicate more effectively than another use of words and symbols, then it is not pedantry.
@@jaredprince4772 You use the word LANGUAGE, there is no word NOONE in proper English language. As I said, there is no end to your IDIOCY. Plainl, you do not recognize the need to use proper words to communicate ideas, any made up ones will do, sort of negates your claim about communication. As I said we have dictionaries for a reason.
What are Cowcasions?
Most middle aged American white women can be labeled as Cowcasians. 😂
I am surprised that this actually exists on this platform. AmRen and similar channels have recently been cancelled. I have downloaded this video (audio content) as I think this program will soon be discovered and be removed.
Did u hear the blacks ooking and eeking through out this lecture?? I did!
Low impulse control.
RIP prof. Rushton. He will be missed.
R Hayat By racist scumbags.
***** I haven't done anything to be called a scumbag, you jackass. Rushton was a racist quack. He's not right. He has been refuted by many scholars. I have videos on my channel of him being refuted.
***** I said Rushton will be missed by racist scumbags. So technically I was calling his supporters scumbags. In any case all of you are racists a word that has great meaning and is only denied by racists. I have an excellent grasp of the topic. Rushton was refuted by Joseph Graves. Again I have the video on my channel. There's also the David Suzuki debate but Graves did a better job.
*****
*Solid fallacy bro.*
That's not a fallacy just a fact.
*So why throw around stupid, meaningless words and dumb ad hominems?*
You haven't shown that racist is a stupid meaningless word and I haven't committed any ad hominem attacks.
*Pertaining to what?*
Rushton's evolutionary argument for racial differences in intelligence. Watch the video.
*Bahahaha. Don't make me laugh. That's a joke and Rushton destroyed him.*
No, he didn't. Suzuki picked him apart.
*How? Do you believe that races don't have differences in skull shape? You're wrong.*
There are differences in craniofacial morphology between some geographic populations that are related to climate and have nothing to do with intelligence.
*See here, for instance, that even with Gould's clear egalitarian bias (like you have) was literally DESTROYED. His shit science doesn't hold up to facts. Racial differences in skull size DO exist.*
Gould had been dead for years before that article was written so he was not alive to defend his views. Some analysts who read the article point out that the authors have a conflict of interest (they work at the University where Morton's skull collection is located) and their research is methodologically flawed (they did not analyze Morton's collection in its totality). I believe that Gould was still correct about Morton in spite of the criticisms against him. As for racial differences in skull size you should give this a read:
bactra.org/sloth/lieberman-on-rushton.pdf
I should point out that I also emailed the lead author of that article and this is what he had to say about Gould and Scientific Racism. He doesn't agree with your or Rushton's views.
Email reply by Jason Lewis:
1) Do you consider Gould to have been a credible scholar (vs. a fraud)?
In the PLOS Biology article, the coauthors and I obviously didn't want to commit the same offense that we are demonstrating that Gould did, namely making accusations of bias and fraud against deceased scholars. What we do show is that at least his work on Morton was riddle with errors and some (we didn't have time to go into all of them in the PLOS piece, we will publish a longer and more detailed version soon) could only be interpreted as either very, very sloppy scholarship, intense bias, or intentional misconduct.
As our data are only relevant to the Morton case, I can't go beyond that to say whether Gould was an overall fraud vs. a credible scholar (e.g. I have little reason to doubt his measurements of shells), but a growing number of people are taking a second look at much of his body of work and finding similar inconsistencies or problems. An article by Will Saletan will be coming out in a month in Discover Magazine addressing exactly that issue. So, we will have to decide as an entire academic community, after all of his work has received a similar amount of detailed reanalysis, whether Gould was a 'fraud', but at least we know for know that there are some factual reasons to look into it in the first place.
2) What is your personal opinion on the use of cranial capacity and brain size to claim racial differences in intelligence?
As we state in the article, there is no reason to believe that cranial capacity is highly correlated with intelligence. Morton did not believe so; Gould invents that as a reason to use Morton's work as a straw man. Personally, I don't even know if what we measure as intelligence today is an appropriate measure of 'cognitive capacity', which is what we are really after. In any case, I in no way endorse the idea of racial differences in intelligence, nor using any measure, whether they be cranial capacities, brain sizes, or even IQ scores themselves, to claim such differences. Again, as we stated in the article, neither did Morton. His purpose in measuring skulls and reporting data was to show that the groups of humans around the world were created separately by God, in order to work around the Biblical discrepancy of 'if we are all descended from Adam and Eve 4,000 years ago, how did we all come to look so different?'.
Egalitarianjay02 Here's an expose' on Graves' work:
jewamongyou.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/the-emperors-new-clothes-book-reviewcritique/
The term "racist" is usually just an ethnic slur to be used against white people.
This is very interesting.... never heard of this things before..
Higher IQ doesn’t make you a better person. It just makes you a smarter, more dangerous animal.
Some people with a higher IQ are very sly, they rob millions of people by means of the pen and get away with it. Their method of violence is less obvious.
Even blood transfusion or organ transplanting requires donor-to-recipient races to be the same. This stuff is so obvious.
Dayon Mage
No it doesn't. Ignorance just abounds.
Great video, very good points. One could call it the real "Inconvenient Truth". You can just see everyone either in shock or in anxiety to start refuting. It's weird how mankind can accept things like blacks make better at certain sports and whites or Asians not, and yet, Oh no! When it comes to IQ or other items it's taboo. There must be a progressive/liberal/denial gene somewhere (or not). 'Would be interesting to go down that path of research.
Spot on. If races can differ so much in appearance, and physical characteristics, it would seem behavior/intellect would also vary to an extent.
There is some kind of truism about what is saying and talking about.
This Video was done way back in 1993 or 1994 or 1995.
Professor Rushton was a crazy professor of his time back in the 1990s.
Go get you a job at a Walmart in some small southern town and you'll see right damn quick that what he's saying is 100% accurate.
Where is Suzuki's rebuttal?
I can sum it up in one word for you: naziiiiiii !!
HerzWatIThink
Scientific research has now become Nazism..LOL.I gather you're a denying UNEDUCATED Marxist Liberal idiot..
Jim Beam none at all
has none
iirc he made the observation that the IQ bell curves of the races overlap. However, that really doesn’t prove anything beyond the prescriptive premise that we cannot judge an individual by his group affiliation.
I'm afraid of having a pointless discussion, where my opponent answers my questions with his own questions. If you don't have the courtesy (which is likely since you have resorted to personal insults already) to wait your turn to ask questions, or you lack the intellectual honesty to give direct answers to questions that embarrass you, then there is no point in discussing anything.
I fear the modern ignorance toward race realism will lead to human degeneracy and ultimately the downfall of man!
The people in the crowd yelling at the speaker just goes to prove his point.
"How can there be gender differences in height, if so many women are taller than so many men? If men were really taller than women it would be clear cut and umabigious.
Any random women can be taller than any random man. So what exactly is your point?"
Do you see the flaw in your argument now?
I'm not a lunatic, I'm not arguing that EVERY SINGLE whit person is smarter than EVERY SINGLE black person, its about group averages. Your really making a very basic mistake in understanding my position.
For those who are still watching I have a very thorough questions to ask regarding this hypothesis. If cold climates supposedly "select" for intelligence because it forces groups to prepare for harsh circumstances by creating shelter, weapons and thus creating civilization, than how come no civilization managed to develop independently in any cold climate? It's well documented that civilization began in Mesopotamia, Egypt and the Indus Valley which have relatively warm climates. I've seen guys give very mediocre explanations as to why this is by saying "they couldn't create civilizations because they were cold and were not able to at that time" but isn't that counter intuitive and contradictory? Also from reading ancient accounts of these supposed "high IQ" modern day people they sounded pretty barbaric at that time and do not really seem to be that type that would when been "selected for". The romans have noted how "savage" the Germanic were and were more prone to drunkenness and incapable of creating civilization while those in warmer climates such as the Greeks and Persians were more intelligent and inventive. I'm still waiting for a solid explanation for this because I see people throwing around this "hypothesis" but there are just so many fallacies and contradictions to it.
Very good point
You won't get any answers, Race Realists are the equivalent to flat-earthers of biology, and archaelogy
Perhaps the Germanic people were "barbaric" simply because they lacked a civilizing religion, access to any kind of formal education, and they were still living in tribes, like Native Americans. Once they had access to theses things they and the rest of northern Europe became the most advanced civilizations. I think this can be partially accounted for by the fact that the first civilizations to acquire civilizing influences like religion were also the oldest (by virtue of being closer to Africa, where our ancestors originated). And a temperate climate may have played a bigger role at that time in assuring people of having food to eat. I imagine it's pretty hard to pass civilization down to your descendents when they're dying of hunger, etc.
Seems clear to me. It takes a warm climate to produce life, and evolution. It takes harsh climates to maximize their adaptation.
That’s a good point man
I think the day is coming, soon, that we can have Designer Genes.
So, if you like certain genes, you can have them with Gene Therapy.
If you wanna be tall, get the Tall Genes.
If you wanna be smart, get the Smart Genes.
If you wanna be handsome/ pretty, get the Pretty/ Handsome Genes.
Personally, I like the Genes I got, but they need some Serious Work.
Thanks to Dr. Rushton, we now could clearly discern that there are differences btw different races or asian, caucasian, & black in terms of the frequency of twin birth rate, the speed of physical/or sexual maturity, the difference in personality & temperament, & intelligence test scores, etc.. These are based on the strict scientific data & so these are the objective facts, not subject ones. After all, he might have vehemently delved into the matter for quite some time. So let's give him credit for that. Btw, It's hard & painful to face this harsh reality for some, but this is irrefutably & incontrovertibly the uncompromising truthful facts. After all, he is a highly qualified scholar ( a clinical psychologist ) who could talk about this sort of taboo subject back in 1980-1990. Thoroughly admire & appreciate it to the core.,,,,,I wonder if anyone else feel the same?!,,,,,(01/20/23)
I'm black and completely agree. Its the reason why Africa is uncivilized, why we lie to ourselves about history, and why we behave the the way we do
@@jameseldridge3445 Thanks for complying w/ me. Have a marvelous day wherever you are. And pls stay safe & healthy amidst the dour plight precipitated by COVID-19 & its variants such as the omicron virus running on a rampage around the world or pandemic.,,,,(02/09/23)
@Racialist Slayer u have a liberally enlightened small d$ck
Facts ARE facts.
I too have no problem believing this. The speaker was unbiased. It does not bother me a bit either.
It's Nature, it's just the cards you were dealt. If a frog had wings he wouldn't be bumping his ass on the ground. No social program can make a frog fly.
Well I have to say as a fellow Cow-casion I found Dr Rushton's speech quite moo-ving.
Environment can account for 50%? lol.. Nope... Since 1989 that figure has been pushed up to about 80% genetics....
Yep the wilson effect. As our brains finish development into adulthood; we get closer to our genotypic maximum and thus closer to our group averages
There is less genetic diversity among Africans. Europeans and asians have Neanderthal and denisovan DNA, both species had brains with higher caloric content because they evolved in ice age conditions.
*"There is less genetic diversity among Africans"*
Incorrect.
*" brains with higher caloric content"*
Why would evolving in ice age conditions make a brain better to eat?
@Verb the Noun I think he meant higher caloric demands. And the genetic diversity within Africa is caused from the lack of travel from these different groups in Africa. They literally stayed in one place for eons upon eons. They're basically the same in physical appearance and intelligence
It is good to hear truth in this world of lies and illusion
Very impressed with the students, listening intently to another’s presentation, without absurd aggression of dissent or other emotional inability to communicate. Perfect summation rendered
Late 80's or early 90's, SJWs didn't existed back then. Imagine giving such lecture now... it would've ended with campus riots for sure.
The Caribbean? Which countries in the Caribbean? Give me a specific country as an example of a black success nation.
Cow-casians. 🙂
If we forget skin colour... we cannot ignore facial structure... you know - simian jaws and bootlips - can this be explained by environmental changes... and then we have Neanderthals who were NOT Homo-sapience, but were native to Europe... and we Europeans are native of Europe... the same way Black Africans are native to Africa... and finally... who can guarantee that current Anthropological science isn't tainted with Political Correctness... as nowadays almost everything is... starting with rewriting history as BBC did by recently "revealing" that first Brits were Black with blue eyes. Hollywood became notorious with their PC.
This guy is so right on the money! As in, he actually knows what he's talking about!
No he doesn't......a psychological professional is more likely to spew pseudoscientific jargon
What are these successful black countries?
11:08 “DAS not RITE” lol ... common this proves his point about lack of impulse control !!!
Partly because of these videos. Books by Rushton and Murray are very important, but hearing these men speak goes a long way for most regular people.
Posted video to Twitter. I'm curious how soon I'll be suspended. I'll update...
That had to be a black lady barking in the background
No Blacks clapped at the end of the presentation... hahaha
Because their hate blinds them to neutral and unbiased facts.
If it where you would you clap?😀