"This isn't a video primarily about khukris, it's actually a video a little bit more about Bowie knives." --proceeds to talk about khukris for 15 minutes.
@Re nato baddass no doubt, but im not necessarily talking about who is going to win in a fight. i would still be more intimidated by a little dude wearing no armor but carrying a big knife and a ear to ear smile. at least if i go against the zweihander (ive no idea how to put those two dots over the a) my death should be quicker.
Having worked with the Gurkhas I can most definitely confirm there is something about them that does make you stop and think when you see these wonderful little guys smile at you .
Kukris are like the Joker. Whenever they make a Batman film and they put the Joker in it, even though it might be called Batman, the Joker actually becomes the main character, and the focus of the story stays primarily on him.
As I recall, when I read a re-imagined update to the tale of "Dracula," that fact was reiterated by the protagonist when he exclaimed aloud 'You can't kill a vampire with a knife!' As I said, it was a re-imagined, modern tale, and it was the author's p.o.v. that a vampire can't be killed with a knife. ~ ;)
@@kendhoward551 that was Fred Saberhagen"s _The Dracula Tape_ , where Stoker's _Dracula_ is told from the first person perspective of the Count himself and to be telling it at all, he obviously wasn't killed by two steel knives😎
I used to work with a man who came to America from Nepal. He made two plywood kukris, and after work, I would go to his house for an hour or two of training. After I got pretty good, he put red lipstick on the edge, and we both wore white t-shirts. I would run away from a Gurkha rather than fight. I prefer to keep all my limbs attached to my torso.
I knew a man who knew a Kami that made a Kukri that killed a bear, and was famous for it, perhaps more so locally than the man that killed the bear, as the man I knew didn't know that dude.
There was also a martial arts form calling 'pounding the lion' where people took on lions barehanded. I do jujutsu...I'm a whimp compared to any of these guys lol
During the brawl following the sand bar duel that established Jim Bowie's reputation, Bowie hewed a decent chunk of flesh out of one of his assailant's arms. He then was stabbed with a cane sword, which was stopped by his collarbone and allowed him to slip his knife 'twixt the ribs of he with the temerity to stab him.
It isn't the particular weapon that's important - it's the raving lunatic charging at you that makes the difference, no matter what he's carrying. Gurkha wins every time.
When I first discovered the kukri, I was fascinated. So, I did a little digging. What I found was that kukris are actually multipurpose bush knives, like machetes. I found a website that still hand made tem in the traditional style and shipped internationally (never got one, still want one), but these included the sheath and two much smaller little blades and explanations on what all the knife is used for. Cutting bush, food, etc, as a very utilitarian tool. I also learned that armed forces in Nepal carry kukris and train with them the way American soldiers carry combat knives. So yeah. Tool and weapon. Really cool that they used to hunt tigers with these little blades. That takes balls, and I hadn't heard that one before. Even more respect for the weapon!
Many people don't know about that, but the curved shape of the kukri allows you to use it like a spokeshave if you put your second hand on the tip of the blade. So, yeah, really multi- purpose
Don't worry about the tiger part, pal. That's bullshit. There's an account from an 1878 book--an Orientalist nightmare of an account--which also makes sure to call them savages. Don't buy it for a bit.
One of my squadmates in Korea bought a Kukri while he was visiting family in Nepal. He tried bringing it into Korea and the police seized it. He was PISSED.
For the Nepalese, the kukri was a great item because it could do a lot of things well. Good for chopping light wood. Good for fighting. Good for general cutting. These people were generally rather poor. They didn't have the option to have more than one knife. Thus the all purpose blade on a kukri. Now, personally, I train more with the kukri than European blades, so I'm as comfortable with it as I'm likely to be with a bowie. However, I don't consider it the be all end all for either combat or woods craft. I do consider it excellent for both, but purpose built weapons would probably be better for each task. When you could only have one, you took the one that would work the best for all the things you needed a blade to do. Interesting comparison though. Thanks.
There is a 19th century account about that saying the fighting kukri was never used for domestic job because it was a prized possession. For domestic use they would have one, or two other knives of similar shape, but made of cheaper metal.
@Till This Day It's still all about the training and skill of the practitioner. The Kukri isn't ideal for a one on one duel. It's not bad either. Many dead Japanese officers in WWII can attest to that. The bowie has it's strengths and weaknesses as well and is a fine dueling weapon. All thing being similar, the person behind the blade is absolutely the deciding factor. By the way, someone trained with a kukri can use it quite effectively as a thrusting weapon. Not a "hacking" weapon at all except with wood. It cuts just like a saber if used properly. No doubt the mythical reputation of the Kukri is absolutely the reflection of the Gurkhas. By the way, they are generally far too short to use with a shield. Were quite effective in close quarters melee situations though.
@ŇøHă Ģ. The gladius was used as a stabbing sword in a rather regimented way that required linked shields. They weren't used or useful as single person dueling weapons. They just didn't work well without the shield line. The Kukri is really not well adapted to that kind of use. The Nepalese had long swords for use with shields. Before the introduction of firearms, the Kukri was probably a secondary weapon, as it often was after that time. Still my favorite big knife, but like everything else, it has areas in which it is stronger and those in which it is less so.
The long straight knife you pulled out made me think of the Arkansas Toothpick. It comes from the same era as the Bowie knife and was created by James Black who created the Bowie Knife with Bowie. The Arkansas Toothpick is less well known outside the USA.
Going to sound weird, but it was great to see someone that really knows what they are doing even with a few test swings. Not very often you see that economy of motion mixed with correct edge orientation on a CZcams video. Love your stuff!
Is it bad that while I do enjoy the historical and technical minutia that Mr. Easton brings to his videos, I very much tune in primarily to hear him deploy his signature "BUT!"?
As someone who has recently sliced through most of my fingers because of my hand riding up onto the blade of the knife I was using, I'm really glad that he mentioned that (10:45)
The Kukri really is a "Tool" adapted to be a War "Weapon" much like a Tomahawk. The Bowie on the other hand was designed to be a "Personal Weapon" from the outset. The Bowie is a Fair Stabbing Weapon, a Great Chopping/Slashing Weapon & is still effective on the reverse slash as well. The Bowie was a significant threat in a fight when firearms were still very unreliable. Anyone that was a serious Boowie Knife user in the mid to late 1800's ALWAYS had the "Clip Point" sharpened for a wicked reverse slash that was as effective as the fore-slash.
I use one for the exact same reason, it is a great knife for general around the campsite work, as well as brush clearing and the like. Prefer them to Parangs or Machetes.
The BOWIE Knife was great in the American Frontier because it was used in hand-to-hand combat, served as the knife to cut meat (for hunting) and cook with for Mountain men, Soldiers/Calvary, and Cowboys during the 1800's in North America. Bowie Knife was probably a great "side weapon" to have in the 1800's, especially during the time when there were muskets in the early half of the 1800's. The Kukri was also used as a farm tool, as well as for fighting. COOL VIDEO on these knives, THANKS!
Love them both...I have been wielding variations of both for just over 40 years. At the end of the day, if I had to chose one, it would be a Bowie...Made to my specifications of coarse. Excellent videos. Thank you!
Good approach. As a 5ft 3 European it's a big blade to me too. I have my father's kukuri he got as a gift in Nepal in the 70s when stationed out there. It's a amazing tool for ground clearance.
As you mention at about 14 minutes, the stabbing usage is similar to that of butterfly swords. Essentially using the weight of the tip to lead and a loose wrist fired like a straight punch to deliver the thrust. About as non-telegraphed as a technique can be.
Why stop there, when he could make it a two parter, with the second part about weapons used by academics? We must examine the cutting potential of medieval treatises. How sharp was medieval paper?
@@demoncard1180 PhDs in Finland can be a rapier along with a ring, hat and diploma. Uppsala University still has a fencing instructor as part of the staff. So yes, scholarly weapons would be an interesting topic :)
Yes, I know what "Gladiator" means. Nonetheless we all know, what is commonly meant with the term. One or few videos on gladiators would be nice, I think. Comparing Gladiator games to modern HEMA, would be a nice topic or not?
The bowie/kukri hybrid you showed is very similar to a common weapon found in the Philipines. It is still commonly carried by soldiers and Marines there also. I was there in 2007 while I was serving in the USMC to help train their forces in advanced urban warfare tactics and saw a number of them with these large (about 20" blade length) knifes with the distinctive kukri heavy front blade curve. They are apparently mostly made from old truck leaf springs and they called them boo-wie knives. I was able to trade for one and I still have it with its simple wooden sheath.
Always enjoy your videos, have to say that I agree with you, I'd rather have a good Bowie,it has more utility to it,had a ka-bar as well as my Fairbairn Sykes (although I prefer the Applegate Fairbairn- sacrilege coming from an ex-Royal Marine!) On my belt/rig.
Interesting discussion. The bowie knife has always been my favorite type of knife, overall. Never tried a Kukri, but maybe I should. Thanks for your input
Exelent video!. Outstanding explanation of the design and intent of both blades. It takes a bit of the Romance out of the design of each, but at the end of the day it's much more important to understand the functionality of blades !.
I find that when using a kukri (khukri, khukuri...whoever), the techniques we use for tomahawk translate pretty well beause the size and balance feel a lot more like a tomahawk than a bowie. I like them both. Give me a big kukri in my main hand and a smaller bowie in my off hand.
The Indian bow-kri- what's not to like? Another knowledgable presentation on a couple of my favorite tools.. some things about the Kukri that I hadnt considered before... The bowie seems like a follow-on to the old scramasax- certainly the same design perimeters... Thanks Matt!
The Khukri wasn’t originally designed for combat, it was a farm tool primarily evolved from an implement used to chop out roots from the sides of newly-dug, mountainside terraces-where the blade-shape proved quite efficient-and to process the good-burning mountain scrabble in the region into firewood. As good ironsmiths proliferated in the Nepalese region, farmers with their khukris became more common and, when called upon by king and country, they were quite lethal fighters. Hence, the chosen knife of the Ghurkas. Still, in combat-between a khukri-wielding Ghurka and a bowie knife-wielding Jim Bowie, my money wouldn’t be on Jimmy.
”Bowies, big blades & the best of battle blades by Bill Bagwell” is an excellent book on this very subject. The Bowie is unique & very cleverly engineered blade in that the fighter can cut in several ways, slashing, sniping & chopping. Also the fighter can use the clipped point for a back cut & because of it’s concave profile it makes the point a leading point much like a talon or claw. Then there is the alignment of the point in relation to the rest of the knife. A well made Bowie should have the point on the end of the centre line making it a perfect thrusting weapon. Bagwell also recommends the sharpening of the point as a fine radius all the way from the main edge, around the tip & onto the back edge. This is so when the tip meets it’s target in a thrust it cuts through rather than ripping in the same way a broad headed arrow does. I cannot recommend this book highly enough if you are interested in this topic.
I really enjoyed this one. Really found it interesting. I review airguns of all types on old CZcams ‘ Solware tv ‘ but iv been a secrete sword and knife collector for many years. Big passion of mine. Great channel you have here. Mark.
Some of the kukris have a talwar hilt that should take care of guard problem, and in the Maratha region the tips of the kukris are designed to thrust and they have a deep fuller through the spine making them lighter
Scholargladiatoria: Matt another excellent, informative video. You touched on something that should be emphasized. In a knife vs knife fightl, the primary attack should be to the wrist of the opponent, with a slashing action, resulting in a eventual disarm or incapacitation of the knife hand. After the knife is dealt with comes, thrusting to the lungs, throat and heart. The offhand should cover at one's throat, thumb to index finger as near to ear to ear, hence the forearm and bicep also guard the chest on the weak side. One of the first things I learned in knife fighting School, is to accept you are going to get cut; and pick where those cuts will be. By focusing on attacking the opponent's wrist one maintains some safety of reach to critical organs and arteries. I learned knife fighting from a Cherokee man, he learned from his father and grandfather. And he also happen to be a hand to hand combat instructor, in the United States Army, where he also learned. He taught me, that his forefathers took as few as five knives in to battle, and these were made of mostly obsidian blade's with mostly antler handles. Sharp as surgical steel and fragile. I hope you never find yourself in a knife fight. I love the channel. Just some food for thought.
Loved this talk. You surprised me with the “Bowie-Kukri” 😆 I used to be one of those guys who had to correct folks on the proper pronunciation of the Bowie knife. I figured it should be pronounced the way Jim and Resin said it. But somehow, you don’t bring that out in me. You have enough of my respect to say it either way. I also prefer knives on the larger size. I’ve had a few Kukuris but never seem to keep them. I do, however, have many Bowies
There's probably something to be said about these sort of weapons that are bridges between knives and short swords, stuff like kukri, some form of naval dirk, japanese wakizashi/kodachi where you can still expect them to cut effectively and be used with cutting motions, on par with some long swords, while still being in the 40cm/16in range.
I'm an Italian old hunter and backpacker and also a knives collector and I love kukries and I own some of them old and new. I tried to carry some of them in hikes and hunts and it was a failure. Kukries are heavy cumbersome and can't really do anything properly chopping included. Quite a different thing with bowie knives: they are lighter and if of proper size, let's say about ten inches, can do everything you need in the woods much more efficiently than kukries. Let's start from chopping: a proper made bowie has a straight blade but with gentle curves at the choil and tip like an ax and is perfect for cutting into wood without gettig stuck. If stuck the slightly curved blade allows to rotate out as with an ax. Besides with a bowie you can slice meat bread vegetables etc. to prepare a meal and skin a boar or a deer or what you may need: try it with a kukri. Besides if you need to split a log of wood you can use batoning the straight spine of a bowie, while it's much more difficult if not impossibile with the round spine of a kukri. For personal protection in Europe the only real possibility is to fend off the attack of feral dogs or stray shepherd's dogs very common in European woods much easier with a bowie than with a kukri for what you have rightly pointed out: the guard, the keen point and the back cut. In conclusion I love kukries and collect them, but let us consider them interesting historical items like swords, daggers etc. and let's bring a real good bowie in the woods.
Another quality video i really enjoyed the comparison and back ground of them. How easy is it too line up a stab with a bowie knife point due to the sweep putting the point higher then the blade does it make any difference at all? im sorry if that seems like a silly question. All the best - Jim
The Kukri / Bowie debate is every bit as convoluted as the cut vs thrust debate. Add in the field/survival/bushcraft knife aspects and we could discuss it for weeks. Ace video! Thanks Matt.
There used to be a video I saw many years ago, of Gurkha's using the Kukri for everything from trimming the grass at thier barracks, but also in fieldcraft. They cleaned several rabbits, fish, and even a small deer with only thier Kukris and one if the other smaller blades stored in thier sheath. If I am remembering correctly it was the Indian Gurkha's not the British military Gurkhas. As the sub-titles looked to be in Hindi.
excellent points! happen to own both myself, and i enjoy the bowie more as well.. it just feels right with it's profound guard, pommel, and beautifully made clip point and sweeping belly 18:02 i've heard that somewhere before lol! 😂
Před 4 lety+1
I loved the design of that large hunting knife at the end. I wonder how it handles.
Fun fact: these are the two knives used to kill Dracula. While I, Quincy Morris used the Bowie to strike Draculas heart, my partner Jonathan Harker used the Kukri for the decapitation. Both being necessary to kill a vampire.
Likely you find the Khukri hard to use because of your fighting theory and training; Go for the vitals style. Threat suppression theory (chopping the hands off) of SE Asia woks well with the Khukri, Bolo and other well bellied knives. And, the hack/chop and draw cut action. Also that style favours smaller nimble people.
I trained in escrima stick combat, and almost all of the drills and forms translate into dual weilding bolo fighting (with the exception of strikes that ignore edge alignment), dual bolos/kukris have the advantages of hooking weapons that work especially well for pole arm combat and sword combat, the hooking ability when applied properly can negate any reach advantages, facilitating as you said, threat suppression theory, on top thag, of blunt force trauma against helmed/armored opponents is fairly effective with the ectra weight on the end also decapitation/amputation, however obviously those can be mitigated with armor and mail
9SS94Cr - Disagree. Have you ever used a Bowie as an outdoors knife? It’s great for chopping but it’s large size make it cumbersome for other chores. The Bowie starts as a fighting knife
Interestingly, I think I'd use the kukri, and here is why: The 'weapon' side of a knife is secondary. It's primarily a tool. Anything the Bowie can do the Kukri can do. In some cases not quite as well, but in many cases much better. If you want to chop wood the kukri is your man. In most circumstances for most 'bush craft' requirements, the kukri is going to win out. Now, you've got a kukri on you because it's the best 'multi tool' available. You probably wouldn't have a bowie on you as well, because "why carry two knives". Therefore, the weapon you have on you is the one you would use. Yes, I know it's a convoluted reason, but it's how my mind thinks. Otherwise you could say 'which would be the best knife to use in a knife fight?' and the answer would be 'an M1911A1'
same here, sure, in a duel a bowie might be better but how many duels does one get into before they lose? the more important thing is the 99% of the time you're not fighting
Well by that logic why not have a machete? It’s just as good as a kukri and should you get into a knife fight, you have the bigger knife. I get it, stupid knife laws that prohibit the carrying of a machete. But if you can open carry a firearm, then you should be able to open carry a machete.
I like both blades, the bowie and the kukri. And I have both. I also have a blade that combines the best of both in one, a bowie kukri. This is one of my favorites. I got it from Nepal and technically it's a tourist blade, but I actually use it out in the field during camping and hunting trips.
I guess part of the kukris usage context contains a good bit of field craft. Being able to compare in chopping ability to an axe, while saving you the weight of carrying a weapon and a chopper to prepare firewood and chop down trees to build camping structures could provide a lot of value in an every day use case.
could you organize a test battle between a blunt kukri and a Bowie knife....Im intrested in seeing the effects of cutting vs thrusting in a knife fight
I got myself a quite big dagger from cudeman (10-11,5 inch blade, 16,5 inch total leight). Very light and fast for its size. The big downside is getting it out very fast in a hurry. In my pov a very important thing when one looks at weapons is context. Primary in regards to laws and where it was carried, used (country, urban, street fighting, self defense, hunting, war, rapeprotection,...) as well as how fast was/is it to deploy and use all as well as tactics used by the opposing forces (e.g. Les Apache in Paris but every big city and country had such groups)
Original Bowie knives had thick and broad blades so you can use it to fry meat like bacon and such on the blade if you're lacking a skillet. Also, the flat spine meant you could bash something on the back to use it as a splitting wedge. It's the length it was so you could wear it under your coat and it be concealed. Bowie was a mountainman first and fighter second. Bowie knife is a good survival knife.
Yup. An awesome all- rounder. I’ve used mine for just about everything you can imagine while out in the boonies except self defense- never needed it for that yet thankfully.
Incorrect. Bowie knife was a fighting knife first and foremost not a utility blade. What historical sources are you using? The Bowie knife was created in the American Southeast not the Rocky Mountains.
One thing Matt forgot to mention is Nepal in its entirety has always been a jungle country with the most roughest geography in the world, and is still covered by 45% jungle cover in 2022 only since 1980s. With big swords, it would be impossible to penetrate the jungle. So the size had to be reduced to kill and survive and hence the Khukuri was born - the ultimate survival tool.
Hey Matt. 1st off let me say I'm a really big fan and I respect your dedication and knowledge of historical weapons. I'm just gonna go out on a limb and say you've probably Forgotten more than I will ever know about weapons. That being said I think some of the so called myths which you referenced about Bowie knives are actually quite useful. If we think about things like Left hand daggers many of them do in fact have large cross guards. Also a great many Bowie knives have either as shaped guards or indeed guards the do sort of curl up, This is everything from the Van tempsky knives, To Western Vietnam era Bowie knives to the more recent hell's Belle by bill Bagwell and even the Bart more knife which is alleged to have belonged to Jim Bowie himself which has both Both mild Sawteethon the back of the blade similar in principle to a sword breaker, As well as what could be described as blade trapping quillons. I think to "you context is a large part of the issue in that a major weapon against which one might come across in that time would be something like a sword cane, Which certainly out distances a Bowie Knife. Would not then someone who opted to carry a Bowie knife instead of something like a sword came be better served, By having some method of momentarily trapping an opponent's blade that they might close the distance possibly even grab an arm than disengage the knife and thrust? These are some of the historical examples I could think of, And for my own part I actually produce large knives with blades trapping additions, And in my own experimentation with both large knives and sword length items they work extremely well. Another historical example I could think of of a similar size would be the sai or jitte. As I said I'm a tremendous fan of your work, And would love to hear your feedback on Any of This.
I remember you having a video on police truncheons a while back. I was wondering what your thoughts were on the Japanese "jutte", especially within the context of it being an anti-sword weapon?
as with all weapons a Kukri isn´t better then the user. if the one in front of them cry "Jai Mahakali, Ayo Gorkhali!" woud make most think twice before going in to close combat.
@Re nato You can break a sword with a stick. Harder to break a stick with a sword! Musashi was primarily a tactician and stratigist. He defeated the minds of his opponents before he ever crossed swords.
@Re nato Oh my. Have you studied this at all? Mushashi was a expert swordsman. He proved that both before and after the fight with Kojiro Sasaki. However, in that specific dual, he did a couple of key things to work against his rival. 1) He was very late to the dual. Thus Kojiro had been pacing the beach waiting for him long enough to become angry and unsettled. 2) He whittled a wooden sword that was longer than the drying pole, which was the overly long sword that gave Kojiro an advantage over people with swords of more standard length. 3) Rather than going through the standard challenge and response cycle that normally started these things, he basically jumped off the boat and bashed the guys head in. He was criticized at the time for using unfair tactics. See? Tactics and strategy. So that for that. The reason that armies have historically used first projectile weapons and then spears and other long arms before resorting to melee weapons is that they work. That has been true in some sense since the cave men hurled rocks at each other. The reason that they used edged weapons by preference, is because it's easier to hurt someone by piercing them than by bashing them. If you can. Sometimes you can't. That's why maces and other clubs were so effective in melee combat. Bashing often got through armor that blades could not. You didn't understand what I said at all. My bad. I hope this was easier to understand.
@Re nato You really don't read well. Yes, I've studied enough martial arts of various styles to know what I'm talking about. Not saying you don't. Just that your reading comprehension leaves much to be desired.
@Re nato he intimidated one of his opponents carving a wooden "sword" out of a piece of wood, he also used to arrive extremely late to the his duels in order to angry his opponents and made them act out of control and be less careful
"This isn't a video primarily about khukris, it's actually a video a little bit more about Bowie knives." --proceeds to talk about khukris for 15 minutes.
"That's not a knoife..."
The Kukri Warrior: cause a little guy with a big knife and a smile is a lot more intimidating then a big guy with a small knife and a frown.
truth
@Re nato baddass no doubt, but im not necessarily talking about who is going to win in a fight. i would still be more intimidated by a little dude wearing no armor but carrying a big knife and a ear to ear smile. at least if i go against the zweihander (ive no idea how to put those two dots over the a) my death should be quicker.
Having worked with the Gurkhas I can most definitely confirm there is something about them that does make you stop and think when you see these wonderful little guys smile at you .
Hot lead pill. Ooppss. Fights over
@@druid799 I watched those dudes decapitate a goat with zero effort. They were slaughtering it to eat. I was instantly sold on the kukri.
"Now this isn't a video primarily about Kukris"
Proceeds to spend 15 minutes and 2/3 of the video talking about the Kukri. Please never change Matt.
hahahahahahahah....but he made his "Point"....
Its all about context!!
But he has Khukri fever and there's only one cure...
Kukris are like the Joker. Whenever they make a Batman film and they put the Joker in it, even though it might be called Batman, the Joker actually becomes the main character, and the focus of the story stays primarily on him.
A most unkind cut!
A kukri and a Bowie were the two weapons that killed Dracula in the novel. True story.
Ah, so the last knife was for vampire hunting. Makes sense.
Matthew Baugh hahaha.
As I recall, when I read a re-imagined update to the tale of "Dracula," that fact was reiterated by the protagonist when he exclaimed aloud 'You can't kill a vampire with a knife!' As I said, it was a re-imagined, modern tale, and it was the author's p.o.v. that a vampire can't be killed with a knife. ~ ;)
@@kendhoward551 that was Fred Saberhagen"s _The Dracula Tape_ , where Stoker's _Dracula_ is told from the first person perspective of the Count himself and to be telling it at all, he obviously wasn't killed by two steel knives😎
@@robertlehnert4148 Have to burn em, behead em, chop em up in a wood-chipper ... but no knives to the heart !! ;)
I used to work with a man who came to America from Nepal. He made two plywood kukris, and after work, I would go to his house for an hour or two of training. After I got pretty good, he put red lipstick on the edge, and we both wore white t-shirts. I would run away from a Gurkha rather than fight. I prefer to keep all my limbs attached to my torso.
Awesome!
Yeah pretty much. I'm fond of my limbs. A master uses the edge of the blade, an amateur uses the point. Kukri's rule.
Honey I swear! Those lipstick marks you find on my shirt every Friday night are from kukri knife fighting practice.....
@@titot2370 *Yeah...... except that the long lines across my chest marking his cuts didn't look "loving" in any way.
@@markmiller897 Internet warriors fanboy badly. Masters use everything from the tip all the way to the butt masterfully.
I have a Kukri that my grandfather brought back from India after WW2. It is one of my most prized possessions.
That's wonderful! I have a Spitfire compass that my father brought back from WW2 (RAF, Italy), also one of my prized possessions.
Matt, I need another video from you talking about this hunting tigers with Kukris business, and I need it on my desk by Monday.
Its mostly hunting leopards and cheetahs since we do not have Bengal tigers in the hills of nepal.
@@CoronaVirus-fu3zl And yet, still impressive.
I knew a man who knew a Kami that made a Kukri that killed a bear, and was famous for it, perhaps more so locally than the man that killed the bear, as the man I knew didn't know that dude.
There was also a martial arts form calling 'pounding the lion' where people took on lions barehanded. I do jujutsu...I'm a whimp compared to any of these guys lol
@@CoronaVirus-fu3zl There are tigers in Nepal. 50 years ago people hunted tigers in the mountains. There are no lions in the wild in Nepal.
In Finland the Bowie-knife is colloquially known as "Rambo-puukko".
Same with Czechs :D "rambo nůž".
Same here in Brazil. It's called "Faca do Rambo", or Rambo's knife
Same in Belgium, we call it a "Rambomes" or Rambo Knife
Sad that foreigners don't know the true origin of that knife.
@@chuckbowie5833 well, it wasn't Rambo, so tell me what info you have.
During the brawl following the sand bar duel that established Jim Bowie's reputation, Bowie hewed a decent chunk of flesh out of one of his assailant's arms. He then was stabbed with a cane sword, which was stopped by his collarbone and allowed him to slip his knife 'twixt the ribs of he with the temerity to stab him.
glad to see someone else bring up the Sandbar fight
This is Major Tom to Matt Easton, I'm cutting through the doooooor, and I'm slashing in a most peculiar way
Lmao
It isn't the particular weapon that's important - it's the raving lunatic charging at you that makes the difference, no matter what he's carrying. Gurkha wins every time.
Still, those raving lunatics seem to love their Kukris more than any other knife :P
When I first discovered the kukri, I was fascinated. So, I did a little digging. What I found was that kukris are actually multipurpose bush knives, like machetes. I found a website that still hand made tem in the traditional style and shipped internationally (never got one, still want one), but these included the sheath and two much smaller little blades and explanations on what all the knife is used for. Cutting bush, food, etc, as a very utilitarian tool. I also learned that armed forces in Nepal carry kukris and train with them the way American soldiers carry combat knives.
So yeah. Tool and weapon. Really cool that they used to hunt tigers with these little blades. That takes balls, and I hadn't heard that one before. Even more respect for the weapon!
Many people don't know about that, but the curved shape of the kukri allows you to use it like a spokeshave if you put your second hand on the tip of the blade. So, yeah, really multi- purpose
Don't worry about the tiger part, pal. That's bullshit. There's an account from an 1878 book--an Orientalist nightmare of an account--which also makes sure to call them savages. Don't buy it for a bit.
One of my squadmates in Korea bought a Kukri while he was visiting family in Nepal. He tried bringing it into Korea and the police seized it. He was PISSED.
damn. Hope he mailed it home
@@SenkaBandit Couldn’t, the KNBG never gave it back.
@@TheSlasherJunkie awwww that sucks
Matt, you just did a video on two of my favorite weapons. Thank you, I learned so much. As a Texan, you are welcome to the Alamo anytime.
For the Nepalese, the kukri was a great item because it could do a lot of things well. Good for chopping light wood. Good for fighting. Good for general cutting. These people were generally rather poor. They didn't have the option to have more than one knife. Thus the all purpose blade on a kukri. Now, personally, I train more with the kukri than European blades, so I'm as comfortable with it as I'm likely to be with a bowie. However, I don't consider it the be all end all for either combat or woods craft. I do consider it excellent for both, but purpose built weapons would probably be better for each task. When you could only have one, you took the one that would work the best for all the things you needed a blade to do. Interesting comparison though.
Thanks.
There is a 19th century account about that saying the fighting kukri was never used for domestic job because it was a prized possession. For domestic use they would have one, or two other knives of similar shape, but made of cheaper metal.
Kukri knives also double as machetes, to hack your way through dense jungle/brush. A big Kukri and a 30-30 is a match made in heaven.
@Till This Day It's still all about the training and skill of the practitioner. The Kukri isn't ideal for a one on one duel. It's not bad either. Many dead Japanese officers in WWII can attest to that. The bowie has it's strengths and weaknesses as well and is a fine dueling weapon. All thing being similar, the person behind the blade is absolutely the deciding factor. By the way, someone trained with a kukri can use it quite effectively as a thrusting weapon. Not a "hacking" weapon at all except with wood. It cuts just like a saber if used properly. No doubt the mythical reputation of the Kukri is absolutely the reflection of the Gurkhas. By the way, they are generally far too short to use with a shield. Were quite effective in close quarters melee situations though.
@ŇøHă Ģ. The gladius was used as a stabbing sword in a rather regimented way that required linked shields. They weren't used or useful as single person dueling weapons. They just didn't work well without the shield line. The Kukri is really not well adapted to that kind of use. The Nepalese had long swords for use with shields. Before the introduction of firearms, the Kukri was probably a secondary weapon, as it often was after that time. Still my favorite big knife, but like everything else, it has areas in which it is stronger and those in which it is less so.
Let's call it a "very short long knife-sword".
Thanks for doing these videos, they're very informative!
The long straight knife you pulled out made me think of the Arkansas Toothpick. It comes from the same era as the Bowie knife and was created by James Black who created the Bowie Knife with Bowie. The Arkansas Toothpick is less well known outside the USA.
it was fun being on Knife or Death as one of the first competitors
Just bring the knew Messer you have. It's just a giant bowie meets an arming sword.
Every time i see the Kukri and the sword mentioned in one sentence, an inner voice shouts in me: "Falcata! Kopis!"
Fun fact: Dialect quizzes for the United States can figure out what state you're probably from based on how you pronounce Bowie.
It's Bowie we have a town in my state named Bowie but it's not pronunced the same
booo wie
You see, hear in the Mid-Atlantic I should have grown up saying boo-wie, but I have always said bow-Ey like a darn Noertheasterner.
It's pronounced Bowie, not Bowie.
alive or trees Thank you for clarifying that.
Fascinating and informative - thanks for posting.
Going to sound weird, but it was great to see someone that really knows what they are doing even with a few test swings. Not very often you see that economy of motion mixed with correct edge orientation on a CZcams video. Love your stuff!
Is it bad that while I do enjoy the historical and technical minutia that Mr. Easton brings to his videos, I very much tune in primarily to hear him deploy his signature "BUT!"?
I think one could argue that it's the context in which the "BUT..." happens that makes it so special.
You like his but
The "howEVER" isn't bad either.
It's Tourette's syndrome, he's actually shouting BUTT.
As someone who has recently sliced through most of my fingers because of my hand riding up onto the blade of the knife I was using, I'm really glad that he mentioned that (10:45)
Nice Boar Spear. I got a cheap one, but it's sturdy and has an ash staff
Glad to see you back. That bowie-kukrie is a monster.
Your a great speaker brother. Every word Crystal clear. Fascinating stuff.. 🙏
The Kukri really is a "Tool" adapted to be a War "Weapon" much like a Tomahawk. The Bowie on the other hand was designed to be a "Personal Weapon" from the outset. The Bowie is a Fair Stabbing Weapon, a Great Chopping/Slashing Weapon & is still effective on the reverse slash as well. The Bowie was a significant threat in a fight when firearms were still very unreliable. Anyone that was a serious Boowie Knife user in the mid to late 1800's ALWAYS had the "Clip Point" sharpened for a wicked reverse slash that was as effective as the fore-slash.
Very detailed and educational analysis. Thank you for sharing!!
I used to have a Kukri on my webbing when I was in the army, excellent piece of kit for use as an axe or machete.
I use one for the exact same reason, it is a great knife for general around the campsite work, as well as brush clearing and the like. Prefer them to Parangs or Machetes.
Great minds think alike! : )
Carried one when I was in Korea in the 80s. It was a good tool and a great conversation piece
These vids are phenomenal. Thanks.
Thanks, Matt. Always fascinating.
The BOWIE Knife was great in the American Frontier because it was used in hand-to-hand combat, served as the knife to cut meat (for hunting) and cook with for Mountain men, Soldiers/Calvary, and Cowboys during the 1800's in North America. Bowie Knife was probably a great "side weapon" to have in the 1800's, especially during the time when there were muskets in the early half of the 1800's. The Kukri was also used as a farm tool, as well as for fighting. COOL VIDEO on these knives, THANKS!
Love them both...I have been wielding variations of both for just over 40 years. At the end of the day, if I had to chose one, it would be a Bowie...Made to my specifications of coarse.
Excellent videos. Thank you!
Of course!
Why the Bowie. Just curious
Good approach. As a 5ft 3 European it's a big blade to me too. I have my father's kukuri he got as a gift in Nepal in the 70s when stationed out there. It's a amazing tool for ground clearance.
As you mention at about 14 minutes, the stabbing usage is similar to that of butterfly swords. Essentially using the weight of the tip to lead and a loose wrist fired like a straight punch to deliver the thrust. About as non-telegraphed as a technique can be.
Drink a shot of your favourite spirit every time Matt says "But!"
Enjoy
Could you one day speak about the weapons of actual gladiators?
Would be fitting for Schola *Gladiatoria* or not? ☺️
Why stop there, when he could make it a two parter, with the second part about weapons used by academics? We must examine the cutting potential of medieval treatises. How sharp was medieval paper?
Or the sharpened nibs of quill pens. 😎
@@demoncard1180 PhDs in Finland can be a rapier along with a ring, hat and diploma.
Uppsala University still has a fencing instructor as part of the staff.
So yes, scholarly weapons would be an interesting topic :)
Well gladiators means swordsmen. Gladius is a sword. Gladiator is a ‘sworder’. Schola gladiatoria is a swordsmanship school.
Yes, I know what "Gladiator" means. Nonetheless we all know, what is commonly meant with the term. One or few videos on gladiators would be nice, I think.
Comparing Gladiator games to modern HEMA, would be a nice topic or not?
Just bought a bowie knife from Tod Cutler. Thank you for having a link to his website ❤️
The bowie/kukri hybrid you showed is very similar to a common weapon found in the Philipines. It is still commonly carried by soldiers and Marines there also. I was there in 2007 while I was serving in the USMC to help train their forces in advanced urban warfare tactics and saw a number of them with these large (about 20" blade length) knifes with the distinctive kukri heavy front blade curve. They are apparently mostly made from old truck leaf springs and they called them boo-wie knives. I was able to trade for one and I still have it with its simple wooden sheath.
Always enjoy your videos, have to say that I agree with you, I'd rather have a good Bowie,it has more utility to it,had a ka-bar as well as my Fairbairn Sykes (although I prefer the Applegate Fairbairn- sacrilege coming from an ex-Royal Marine!) On my belt/rig.
A bowie is easier to shave with... gotta keep those mutton chops trimmed!!
Interesting discussion. The bowie knife has always been my favorite type of knife, overall. Never tried a Kukri, but maybe I should. Thanks for your input
Great info here - thanks for the video!
Exelent video!. Outstanding explanation of the design and intent of both blades. It takes a bit of the Romance out of the design of each, but at the end of the day it's much more important to understand the functionality of blades !.
Very reasoned consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of both knives.
I find that when using a kukri (khukri, khukuri...whoever), the techniques we use for tomahawk translate pretty well beause the size and balance feel a lot more like a tomahawk than a bowie.
I like them both. Give me a big kukri in my main hand and a smaller bowie in my off hand.
Yes!
Nice video! Thank you for sharing.
The Indian bow-kri- what's not to like? Another knowledgable presentation on a couple of my favorite tools.. some things about the Kukri that I hadnt considered before... The bowie seems like a follow-on to the old scramasax- certainly the same design perimeters... Thanks Matt!
Very educational video thanks mate 👍🏼
...and mr. Easton just casually sleight of hands us with a rondel dagger.
The Khukri wasn’t originally designed for combat, it was a farm tool primarily evolved from an implement used to chop out roots from the sides of newly-dug, mountainside terraces-where the blade-shape proved quite efficient-and to process the good-burning mountain scrabble in the region into firewood. As good ironsmiths proliferated in the Nepalese region, farmers with their khukris became more common and, when called upon by king and country, they were quite lethal fighters. Hence, the chosen knife of the Ghurkas. Still, in combat-between a khukri-wielding Ghurka and a bowie knife-wielding Jim Bowie, my money wouldn’t be on Jimmy.
Awesome video !
Thanks
I love my KaBar Kukri, I use it as a machete as a lopper for limbs and very small trees in my overgrown back yard.
”Bowies, big blades & the best of battle blades by Bill Bagwell” is an excellent book on this very subject.
The Bowie is unique & very cleverly engineered blade in that the fighter can cut in several ways, slashing, sniping & chopping.
Also the fighter can use the clipped point for a back cut & because of it’s concave profile it makes the point a leading point much like a talon or claw.
Then there is the alignment of the point in relation to the rest of the knife. A well made Bowie should have the point on the end of the centre line making it a perfect thrusting weapon.
Bagwell also recommends the sharpening of the point as a fine radius all the way from the main edge, around the tip & onto the back edge. This is so when the tip meets it’s target in a thrust it cuts through rather than ripping in the same way a broad headed arrow does.
I cannot recommend this book highly enough if you are interested in this topic.
Philip Verity that title though. So many B’s.
Carmelo Washburn Aye! So it is, damned good book all the same!
Take care 😉
Philip Verity - I never understood the point of rounding the tip
Could slide of a rib. Questionable...
I really enjoyed this one. Really found it interesting. I review airguns of all types on old CZcams ‘ Solware tv ‘ but iv been a secrete sword and knife collector for many years. Big passion of mine. Great channel you have here. Mark.
Thank you for the good information. Good comparison. I like the third option.
Some of the kukris have a talwar hilt that should take care of guard problem, and in the Maratha region the tips of the kukris are designed to thrust and they have a deep fuller through the spine making them lighter
Scholargladiatoria: Matt another excellent, informative video. You touched on something that should be emphasized. In a knife vs knife fightl, the primary attack should be to the wrist of the opponent, with a slashing action, resulting in a eventual disarm or incapacitation of the knife hand. After the knife is dealt with comes, thrusting to the lungs, throat and heart. The offhand should cover at one's throat, thumb to index finger as near to ear to ear, hence the forearm and bicep also guard the chest on the weak side. One of the first things I learned in knife fighting School, is to accept you are going to get cut; and pick where those cuts will be. By focusing on attacking the opponent's wrist one maintains some safety of reach to critical organs and arteries. I learned knife fighting from a Cherokee man, he learned from his father and grandfather. And he also happen to be a hand to hand combat instructor, in the United States Army, where he also learned. He taught me, that his forefathers took as few as five knives in to battle, and these were made of mostly obsidian blade's with mostly antler handles. Sharp as surgical steel and fragile. I hope you never find yourself in a knife fight. I love the channel. Just some food for thought.
Love, love, love this video 10/10 Matt
They intentionally got into knife fights with tigers? Jesus. And I thought bullfighting was daring.
@Dick Fageroni actually they did fight with tigers, chinesemartialstudies.com/2016/06/09/hunting-a-tiger-with-a-kukri/
I got that same rondel dagger, I luv it .
Loved this talk.
You surprised me with the “Bowie-Kukri”
😆
I used to be one of those guys who had to correct folks on the proper pronunciation of the Bowie knife. I figured it should be pronounced the way Jim and Resin said it. But somehow, you don’t bring that out in me. You have enough of my respect to say it either way.
I also prefer knives on the larger size. I’ve had a few Kukuris but never seem to keep them. I do, however, have many Bowies
There's probably something to be said about these sort of weapons that are bridges between knives and short swords, stuff like kukri, some form of naval dirk, japanese wakizashi/kodachi where you can still expect them to cut effectively and be used with cutting motions, on par with some long swords, while still being in the 40cm/16in range.
I'm an Italian old hunter and backpacker and also a knives collector and I love kukries and I own some of them old and new. I tried to carry some of them in hikes and hunts and it was a failure. Kukries are heavy cumbersome and can't really do anything properly chopping included. Quite a different thing with bowie knives: they are lighter and if of proper size, let's say about ten inches, can do everything you need in the woods much more efficiently than kukries. Let's start from chopping: a proper made bowie has a straight blade but with gentle curves at the choil and tip like an ax and is perfect for cutting into wood without gettig stuck. If stuck the slightly curved blade allows to rotate out as with an ax. Besides with a bowie you can slice meat bread vegetables etc. to prepare a meal and skin a boar or a deer or what you may need: try it with a kukri. Besides if you need to split a log of wood you can use batoning the straight spine of a bowie, while it's much more difficult if not impossibile with the round spine of a kukri. For personal protection in Europe the only real possibility is to fend off the attack of feral dogs or stray shepherd's dogs very common in European woods much easier with a bowie than with a kukri for what you have rightly pointed out: the guard, the keen point and the back cut. In conclusion I love kukries and collect them, but let us consider them interesting historical items like swords, daggers etc. and let's bring a real good bowie in the woods.
Indeed. And can be made into a spear.
Nice analysis
Another quality video i really enjoyed the comparison and back ground of them. How easy is it too line up a stab with a bowie knife point due to the sweep putting the point higher then the blade does it make any difference at all? im sorry if that seems like a silly question. All the best - Jim
Very interesting video.. Can you recormend any good books on Bowies and their historical use?
The Kukri / Bowie debate is every bit as convoluted as the cut vs thrust debate.
Add in the field/survival/bushcraft knife aspects and we could discuss it for weeks.
Ace video! Thanks Matt.
There used to be a video I saw many years ago, of Gurkha's using the Kukri for everything from trimming the grass at thier barracks, but also in fieldcraft. They cleaned several rabbits, fish, and even a small deer with only thier Kukris and one if the other smaller blades stored in thier sheath.
If I am remembering correctly it was the Indian Gurkha's not the British military Gurkhas. As the sub-titles looked to be in Hindi.
excellent points! happen to own both myself, and i enjoy the bowie more as well.. it just feels right with it's profound guard, pommel, and beautifully made clip point and sweeping belly
18:02 i've heard that somewhere before lol! 😂
I loved the design of that large hunting knife at the end. I wonder how it handles.
Fun fact: these are the two knives used to kill Dracula.
While I, Quincy Morris used the Bowie to strike Draculas heart, my partner Jonathan Harker used the Kukri for the decapitation. Both being necessary to kill a vampire.
Likely you find the Khukri hard to use because of your fighting theory and training; Go for the vitals style. Threat suppression theory (chopping the hands off) of SE Asia woks well with the Khukri, Bolo and other well bellied knives. And, the hack/chop and draw cut action. Also that style favours smaller nimble people.
I trained in escrima stick combat, and almost all of the drills and forms translate into dual weilding bolo fighting (with the exception of strikes that ignore edge alignment), dual bolos/kukris have the advantages of hooking weapons that work especially well for pole arm combat and sword combat, the hooking ability when applied properly can negate any reach advantages, facilitating as you said, threat suppression theory, on top thag, of blunt force trauma against helmed/armored opponents is fairly effective with the ectra weight on the end also decapitation/amputation, however obviously those can be mitigated with armor and mail
Everyone knows the kukri gets its power from the magical notch on the blade
Correction, everyone knows the Kukri gets its power from the Gurkha soldier holding it.
Nope. It's the hidden power of the Mercedes leaf springs they're made of.
@@mrbones3163 Jeep originally, Toyota now.
Funny enough you're right, it's what helps it cut since that notch is a relief point for the blade.
In my opinion both kukri and bowie are primarily tools that happened to be very decent weapons.
9SS94Cr - Disagree. Have you ever used a Bowie as an outdoors knife? It’s great for chopping but it’s large size make it cumbersome for other chores. The Bowie starts as a fighting knife
Interestingly, I think I'd use the kukri, and here is why:
The 'weapon' side of a knife is secondary. It's primarily a tool.
Anything the Bowie can do the Kukri can do. In some cases not quite as well, but in many cases much better. If you want to chop wood the kukri is your man. In most circumstances for most 'bush craft' requirements, the kukri is going to win out.
Now, you've got a kukri on you because it's the best 'multi tool' available. You probably wouldn't have a bowie on you as well, because "why carry two knives".
Therefore, the weapon you have on you is the one you would use.
Yes, I know it's a convoluted reason, but it's how my mind thinks.
Otherwise you could say 'which would be the best knife to use in a knife fight?' and the answer would be 'an M1911A1'
same here, sure, in a duel a bowie might be better but how many duels does one get into before they lose? the more important thing is the 99% of the time you're not fighting
Well by that logic why not have a machete? It’s just as good as a kukri and should you get into a knife fight, you have the bigger knife.
I get it, stupid knife laws that prohibit the carrying of a machete. But if you can open carry a firearm, then you should be able to open carry a machete.
@@bigredwolf6 because the discussion was between a kukri and Bowie.
Ian N Yea but you included a 1911 at the end. So I figured it was fair game to talk about other tools/weapons
@@bigredwolf6 have you ever try choping wood with a machete??? You are welcome to try....
I like both blades, the bowie and the kukri. And I have both. I also have a blade that combines the best of both in one, a bowie kukri. This is one of my favorites. I got it from Nepal and technically it's a tourist blade, but I actually use it out in the field during camping and hunting trips.
Awesome insight and knives, I'd prefer the bowie over the kukri as well. But a more even match up would be bowie vs smatchet.
I guess part of the kukris usage context contains a good bit of field craft. Being able to compare in chopping ability to an axe, while saving you the weight of carrying a weapon and a chopper to prepare firewood and chop down trees to build camping structures could provide a lot of value in an every day use case.
Could you do a video comparing the British Commando knife vs The Bowie knife?
could you organize a test battle between a blunt kukri and a Bowie knife....Im intrested in seeing the effects of cutting vs thrusting in a knife fight
You are correct. The kukri came in second. It lost to an oakshot type XII I believe.
Very relevant when you live in London ....
RIP London
We had Kukri vs Bowie. But how about Kukri vs Bon Jovi?
Bon jovi, forget it.
Chaka Kahn vs Genghis Kahn
Would love to hear your thoughts on Kopis swords.
I got myself a quite big dagger from cudeman (10-11,5 inch blade, 16,5 inch total leight). Very light and fast for its size.
The big downside is getting it out very fast in a hurry.
In my pov a very important thing when one looks at weapons is context.
Primary in regards to laws and where it was carried, used (country, urban, street fighting, self defense, hunting, war, rapeprotection,...) as well as how fast was/is it to deploy and use all as well as tactics used by the opposing forces (e.g. Les Apache in Paris but every big city and country had such groups)
Original Bowie knives had thick and broad blades so you can use it to fry meat like bacon and such on the blade if you're lacking a skillet. Also, the flat spine meant you could bash something on the back to use it as a splitting wedge. It's the length it was so you could wear it under your coat and it be concealed. Bowie was a mountainman first and fighter second. Bowie knife is a good survival knife.
Yup. An awesome all- rounder. I’ve used mine for just about everything you can imagine while out in the boonies except self defense- never needed it for that yet thankfully.
Incorrect. Bowie knife was a fighting knife first and foremost not a utility blade.
What historical sources are you using? The Bowie knife was created in the American Southeast not the Rocky Mountains.
One thing Matt forgot to mention is Nepal in its entirety has always been a jungle country with the most roughest geography in the world, and is still covered by 45% jungle cover in 2022 only since 1980s. With big swords, it would be impossible to penetrate the jungle. So the size had to be reduced to kill and survive and hence the Khukuri was born - the ultimate survival tool.
Thanks!
Hey Matt. 1st off let me say I'm a really big fan and I respect your dedication and knowledge of historical weapons. I'm just gonna go out on a limb and say you've probably Forgotten more than I will ever know about weapons. That being said I think some of the so called myths which you referenced about Bowie knives are actually quite useful. If we think about things like Left hand daggers many of them do in fact have large cross guards. Also a great many Bowie knives have either as shaped guards or indeed guards the do sort of curl up, This is everything from the Van tempsky knives, To Western Vietnam era Bowie knives to the more recent hell's Belle by bill Bagwell and even the Bart more knife which is alleged to have belonged to Jim Bowie himself which has both Both mild Sawteethon the back of the blade similar in principle to a sword breaker, As well as what could be described as blade trapping quillons. I think to "you context is a large part of the issue in that a major weapon against which one might come across in that time would be something like a sword cane, Which certainly out distances a Bowie Knife. Would not then someone who opted to carry a Bowie knife instead of something like a sword came be better served, By having some method of momentarily trapping an opponent's blade that they might close the distance possibly even grab an arm than disengage the knife and thrust? These are some of the historical examples I could think of, And for my own part I actually produce large knives with blades trapping additions, And in my own experimentation with both large knives and sword length items they work extremely well. Another historical example I could think of of a similar size would be the sai or jitte. As I said I'm a tremendous fan of your work, And would love to hear your feedback on Any of This.
Reach is important as long as it does nor interfer with mechanics. Space (to operate), Leverage (weight and angle), Speed (time between forms).
I remember you having a video on police truncheons a while back. I was wondering what your thoughts were on the Japanese "jutte", especially within the context of it being an anti-sword weapon?
I was going to say: hmmm but Matt, my Kukri has a guard! Ahh. I see. It's a "modern" kukri.
What is that one-handed sword below the feder on the wall in the background?
Hi Matt, would you actually prefer a bowie to a European dagger like a left hand dagger with a cross and a ring?
as with all weapons a Kukri isn´t better then the user. if the one in front of them cry "Jai Mahakali, Ayo Gorkhali!" woud make most think twice before going in to close combat.
@Re nato You can break a sword with a stick. Harder to break a stick with a sword! Musashi was primarily a tactician and stratigist. He defeated the minds of his opponents before he ever crossed swords.
@Re nato Oh my. Have you studied this at all? Mushashi was a expert swordsman. He proved that both before and after the fight with Kojiro Sasaki. However, in that specific dual, he did a couple of key things to work against his rival. 1) He was very late to the dual. Thus Kojiro had been pacing the beach waiting for him long enough to become angry and unsettled. 2) He whittled a wooden sword that was longer than the drying pole, which was the overly long sword that gave Kojiro an advantage over people with swords of more standard length. 3) Rather than going through the standard challenge and response cycle that normally started these things, he basically jumped off the boat and bashed the guys head in. He was criticized at the time for using unfair tactics.
See? Tactics and strategy.
So that for that. The reason that armies have historically used first projectile weapons and then spears and other long arms before resorting to melee weapons is that they work. That has been true in some sense since the cave men hurled rocks at each other. The reason that they used edged weapons by preference, is because it's easier to hurt someone by piercing them than by bashing them. If you can. Sometimes you can't. That's why maces and other clubs were so effective in melee combat. Bashing often got through armor that blades could not.
You didn't understand what I said at all. My bad. I hope this was easier to understand.
@Re nato You really don't read well. Yes, I've studied enough martial arts of various styles to know what I'm talking about. Not saying you don't. Just that your reading comprehension leaves much to be desired.
@Re nato he intimidated one of his opponents carving a wooden "sword" out of a piece of wood, he also used to arrive extremely late to the his duels in order to angry his opponents and made them act out of control and be less careful
Hey Matt do you have any info on the bolo