The power gains are rather impressive given the displacement of the engine and the number of cylinders. Slap that package down in a fox body notch back and it would be quite the little rocket. Tune 5 is only about 50 hp shy of a 5.7 liter Hemi R/T and almost right there in torque spec too. To be completely honest it is more power than you will ever need in a daily driver UTE. Eco-boost engines are crazy undertuned from the factory and have serious room to grow without having to mess with internals. Thanks for sharing.
Personally, I find it too bad in a way. It's not even getting a 3.5 eccoboost, HP tuned, like the trucks. I think it's a 3L turbo? I think? I thought that the stock Bronco should have come out the gate with the bronco raptor spec. from day 1. I heard that the next Gen Bronco Raptor might be aiming alot higher, but who knows. I was either getting a 250 tremor /this year, or a Bronco Sasquatch. But after going to the dealership a couple days ago, I'm going 250 Platinum Tremor. Practicality won out, but also a huge bump in off-road performance and comfort on/off road. Ya never know though, in 4 years the Bronco might get a second chance from me, ya just never know. Maybe the hype was so big that my expectations were too big too, and that's why I was a bit disappointed.
Man that was a serious jump in H.P. & T.Q. these engine do have a lot potential for big gains, the exhaust i would pick 4 first 1 second very close choice.
All 4 sounded about the same at light throttle and WOT. Configuration 1 has girgly raspy sound at half throttle during shifts that the other configurations don't seem to have. I'd probably go configuration 2.
i dont know about the engines today but i worked at roush at the dyno shop back in 94 and they would do durability test and the engines would run at wot(wide open throttle) for hours at a time
Guys, I'm in the middle of my 7.3 Godzilla engine and transmission and rear end swap for my two door bronco. It's coming along well, all baby work done by me at my shop. This is just my side project, I do steel architectural fab. Took me a few months at my Ford dealer to get the f350 rear axle, should be here mid next week. Still am undecided on the transfer case, any ideas?
I didn’t see the second QR code to get entered in to win the Magna-flow Overland Exhaust system. I went to the link for the first QR code that goes to your website. Did you forget to put in the second QR code? Also, with the Dyno did you do any pulls with the exhaust system on it? It seemed super quite.
I think we made it a little too difficult to find. The actual link is hidden later in the video during the magnaflow portion. No pulls yet with the exhaust but it most likely doesn't add any power. We will get it back on there soon
@@PalmBeachDyno I thought it was clever - you need to pay attention and watch the video to participate, you hit the nail on the head. I've got a Bronco sitting in the driveway and the exhaust would be a real fun thing to change up.
I honestly wouldn't spend the $ to add that sound to my Bronco. I would spend the $ to get a nice dual Black tip exhaust tho, so if it has a wee bit better sound all the better.
@@robotdrawer Number from the manufacturer are all Crank horsepower. The engine from factory is at around 330 at the engine. After power loss through the rotational mass of the drivetrain, driveshaft, axles, wheels and tires, You lose a certain amount to before getting wheel horsepower. So 330hp engine, 260hp to ground stock.
@@robotdrawer factory rating is at the crank. 320 at the wheels is about 375 at the crank with 15% this is likely closer to 20% so likely closer to 400 crank
The interesting thing is the ranger 2.3 makes very similar Dyno numbers. Thought the v6 would have been a significant difference. And the ranger is also faster 0-60 with the 2.3 I guess that bronco is heavy
@@colbywedgworth9676- i paid $46k for a maxed out Outer Banks, 2.7, 4 dr, with lockers, high pkg and many more accessories! By comparison, RAV 4’s and CR-V’s are leaving the lots at ~ +$40k for a very mundane driving experience! It’s weird that you mentioned $80k because virtually everyone that’s inquired about my car assumed that i paid $80k - $90k for it!
@@bryan70546 you will never have turbo lag with the Ecoboosts. It's ECM torque limiting to help keep trans happy longer. All ecm diesels have done this for 2 decades +
These engines have a lot of potential
Remember the 2.7 is lower output version of the 3.0 in the explorer st
Both engines love hood tuning more so than the 3.5
The whole truck lifted under that hard pull, that was crazy
it weighs like 5000 lbs too.
The power gains are rather impressive given the displacement of the engine and the number of cylinders. Slap that package down in a fox body notch back and it would be quite the little rocket. Tune 5 is only about 50 hp shy of a 5.7 liter Hemi R/T and almost right there in torque spec too. To be completely honest it is more power than you will ever need in a daily driver UTE. Eco-boost engines are crazy undertuned from the factory and have serious room to grow without having to mess with internals. Thanks for sharing.
Great video, well put together and informative. Damn I want a 2 door for a daily
Looking forward to y’all getting your hands on the upcoming Bronco Raptor. Should be a fun day 😉😂
Bronco was a bust bro. All that hype for nothing. Definitley would rather spend 40 grand on a throwback 70s bronco or even 90s bronco
@@kylekashner2786 the 100,000+ preorders that they’re trying to fill would disagree with you on that. Personally I think they nailed it.
@@kylekashner2786 ok then go get one
Personally, I find it too bad in a way. It's not even getting a 3.5 eccoboost, HP tuned, like the trucks. I think it's a 3L turbo? I think? I thought that the stock Bronco should have come out the gate with the bronco raptor spec. from day 1. I heard that the next Gen Bronco Raptor might be aiming alot higher, but who knows. I was either getting a 250 tremor /this year, or a Bronco Sasquatch. But after going to the dealership a couple days ago, I'm going 250 Platinum Tremor. Practicality won out, but also a huge bump in off-road performance and comfort on/off road. Ya never know though, in 4 years the Bronco might get a second chance from me, ya just never know. Maybe the hype was so big that my expectations were too big too, and that's why I was a bit disappointed.
You're right though. The Bronco Raptor testing should be a dang-good video to watch, and I can't wait to see the numbers too.
Can’t wait to get my Bronco and get that device.
Man that was a serious jump in H.P. & T.Q. these engine do have a lot potential for big gains, the exhaust i would
pick 4 first 1 second very close choice.
The last video on the exhaust is best . It sounds clean with little rasp.
STRAIGHT OUTTA PALM BEACH 👊🏻💪🏻
2.3, or 2.7?
I saw the QR code.. a blink of a second. Hmm
That Rapid Red Bronco looks awesome
4th one a little more “throaty”.maybe..hard to tell with the times gap between sounds..
been using this on my 19 3.5 ecoboost 150 then on my 21 3.5 eco 150 works absolutly awsome ..
Hey check these numbers in my 3.5 ecoboost czcams.com/video/JlHGPHhub98/video.html
All 4 sounded about the same at light throttle and WOT. Configuration 1 has girgly raspy sound at half throttle during shifts that the other configurations don't seem to have. I'd probably go configuration 2.
Ford bronco coming with GT500 engine from palm Beach dyno
Do configuration #5 where you take the small cap off and run it with the dual outlets on the muffler open.
I like muffler configuration #4 nice bass note on the exhaust and that little programmer sure woke up that torque curve I like it.
Thanks 👍
I thought your window was open 😂 great results pretty impressive
Thanks for doing this...looking forward to your next video. I have the JB4 in my Bronco! It rips!
What engine?
Awesome work. The JB4 piggyback tuner is amazing. I plan on getting one for my Bronco. That exhaust sounds amazing as well. Hope I win. Wish me luck 🍀
JB4s are awesome and they do great work for the bmw boys
What engine is it?
That exhaust didn't sound bad at all.
I know there's always the chance of reliability going down, but what do you guys think about the internals? Can they sustain this for a long time?
i dont know about the engines today but i worked at roush at the dyno shop back in 94 and they would do durability test and the engines would run at wot(wide open throttle) for hours at a time
Very thorough as usual!
Help me understand what was the final HP/TQ numbers for Map #1
Were the base numbers on 87 or 93?
Guys, I'm in the middle of my 7.3 Godzilla engine and transmission and rear end swap for my two door bronco. It's coming along well, all baby work done by me at my shop. This is just my side project, I do steel architectural fab. Took me a few months at my Ford dealer to get the f350 rear axle, should be here mid next week. Still am undecided on the transfer case, any ideas?
What's in the f250 tremor?
How much of that gain should be contributed to the ethanol fuel they put in?
Ethanol allows you to run more timing and/or "boost". Just higher octane rating
The exhaust sounds great and is nice and tucked up too! Love the output from that JB4, talk about nuts!
Wonder why it’s so much slower than an f150 with the same engine/trans. Can’t imagine the bigger tires making it that much slower
Bigger tires make a huuuuge difference. Ever want to go a lot slower, just throw bigger tires on lol
ECM torque management. trans gearing/tuning
Sounds great 👍
I didn’t see the second QR code to get entered in to win the Magna-flow Overland Exhaust system. I went to the link for the first QR code that goes to your website. Did you forget to put in the second QR code? Also, with the Dyno did you do any pulls with the exhaust system on it? It seemed super quite.
I think we made it a little too difficult to find. The actual link is hidden later in the video during the magnaflow portion. No pulls yet with the exhaust but it most likely doesn't add any power. We will get it back on there soon
@@PalmBeachDyno I thought it was clever - you need to pay attention and watch the video to participate, you hit the nail on the head. I've got a Bronco sitting in the driveway and the exhaust would be a real fun thing to change up.
Do u guys tune The Maverick 2.0?
I thought the Wildtrak had a sport mode that should be better than Baja.
I honestly wouldn't spend the $ to add that sound to my Bronco. I would spend the $ to get a nice dual Black tip exhaust tho, so if it has a wee bit better sound all the better.
Is this with the 2.4 4cyl?
2.7
@@josiahkunstman8168 Isn't the 2.7 rated at 330hp 400 lb tq straight up with high octane?
@@robotdrawer Number from the manufacturer are all Crank horsepower. The engine from factory is at around 330 at the engine. After power loss through the rotational mass of the drivetrain, driveshaft, axles, wheels and tires, You lose a certain amount to before getting wheel horsepower. So 330hp engine, 260hp to ground stock.
@@robotdrawer that’s at the crank. they are measuring wheel hp
Who will be the first to swap in a turbo from Turbonetics?😝
That thing runs like a turbo diesel, same type of torque and power curves.
So which engine was this? 2.3 or 2.7
2.7 but I thought it was already rated at 330 HP so I'm not sure
@@robotdrawer factory rating is at the crank. 320 at the wheels is about 375 at the crank with 15% this is likely closer to 20% so likely closer to 400 crank
@@robotdrawer That would be Fords rating at the flywheel not at the ground.
Sounds like a freaking V6.
That's because it is.
Is this the 2.7 ecoboost
Yes!
The interesting thing is the ranger 2.3 makes very similar Dyno numbers. Thought the v6 would have been a significant difference. And the ranger is also faster 0-60 with the 2.3 I guess that bronco is heavy
@@Randomadventurelife actually no the 2.7 is detuned
“Bey honey, I know we just spent $80k on a piece of plastic car, but what she we upgrade on it because $80k buy-in just wasn’t enough?”…
Theyre like 60k fully trimmed out.
@@colbywedgworth9676- i paid $46k for a maxed out Outer Banks, 2.7, 4 dr, with lockers, high pkg and many more accessories! By comparison, RAV 4’s and CR-V’s are leaving the lots at ~ +$40k for a very mundane driving experience! It’s weird that you mentioned $80k because virtually everyone that’s inquired about my car assumed that i paid $80k - $90k for it!
Every one of those exhaust configurations sound like ass. And you know it. Lol
very healthy
1 and 4 sound identical
Isn't the Bronco AWD? I didn't know you can get a 2WD version.
It's 4WD, you can select between 2wd, 4hi, 4lo and 4auto (auto on certain models)
Sounds like a microwave on defrost
you’re hearing alot of tire and dyno noise aswell.
Maybe I missed it. Which engine is in this one?
Wildtrack only comes with 2.7
Are u in 4auto when launching it ?
"Should of had a V8"
My guess before watching was 310/420. Close
2.3 or 2.7...sounds like a 2.7
What kind of dyno test doesn't look at a/f and boost levels when making runs & comparisons. Hack jobs.
It seems like the new Ford vehicles pick up really slow for the first 60 feet
turbo lag
Or torque management?
@@freethinkingamerican80 I think your spot on. It’s torque management.
@@bryan70546 you will never have turbo lag with the Ecoboosts. It's ECM torque limiting to help keep trans happy longer. All ecm diesels have done this for 2 decades +
I dunno.. my 89 aerostar straight pipe 3.0 would massacre that bronco loool
that aluminum ecoboost will blow up in 10k miles
392 jeep wrangler better
Overpriced junk
Typical "can't afford it hater"