Ben Duckett: Cricket's rogue opener | IND vs ENG Test series
Vložit
- čas přidán 16. 06. 2024
- Click on the link below to get 40% off -
Nord VPN: nordvpn.com/kimber
Check out my Flexispot products here -
Product link- bit.ly/3viZBkN
FlexiSpot-landing page exclusive link- bit.ly/4aBl8Fk
#flexispotuk
Discover Ben Duckett, cricket's rogue opener, defying English traditions with his unconventional approach. From a slightly wild off-field persona to a unique batting style, Duckett stands out in the lineage of England's openers. In this video we explore Duckett's journey, his sweeping prowess, and the impact of the Bazball revolution on this one-of-a-kind Test opener.
Don't forget to like, share, and subscribe for more exciting cricket content.
My Podcast channel: / @jarrodkimberpodcasts
My sports writing course: sportswriting.teachable.com/
Buy me a coffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/jarrodki...
Patreon - / jarrodkimber
Thanks to Bodyline T shirts - www.bodylinetshirts.com
#cricket #indvseng #ashwin - Sport
When I saw Duckett in the Ashes, I thought that would be his last series, but he’s actually done incredibly well since then
Yeah he's survived too big tests. However the next part is where it gets real interesting because everyone knows exactly how he plays now.
Alister cook?
WG Grace
Chris Ta are !
Tavare
I still wonder, how Duckett reached to Jimmy's head 🤔
Best
CZcams, this channel deserves millions of subscribers. Timber explained by kimber is the best. Thanks Sir
Also world cricket's motivator, without him Jaiswal wouldn't have scored those 600 runs in this series so far.
Duckett inspired Bradman.
@@JarrodKimberYT Is this for real, did i get a reply from one of the greatest cricket analyst ever?
Below is reason why England's Bazball approach needs a tweak czcams.com/video/9gfJ0sUqLog/video.html
@@karthik_udayaand is your main comment a joke 😂
Quality Cricket Content after a very long time ✨. Hearty wishes mate :)
Ducket dows well initially cause we all know the new ball in India assists both oace and spin well. Its smart to get quick runs jn the first 20 overs. India should bowl fhe 5th stump line rather than attackjng the stumps in this phase
Yeah I think that explains him and Crawley. But Australia bowled the 5th stump line to him
@@JarrodKimberYT for that I trust your analysis sir, not having watched the series myself.
Jarrod, take a shot everytime someone comments ''Cook?''
Can you please do an analysis on the amount of swing (movement) over five days in the matches these guys played and before that...in cricket context matters, not just the numbers
There is less swing now because Teams found a quicker way to get batters out using seam. Duckett came into one of the lowest periods ever for openers in terms of average. There's your context.
He looks like a jittery opener to me. Riding his luck a lot of times. Murphy is lurking in the corner.
ah, you dont understand modern cricket, its complicated. why domnt you go and watch reruns from the 90's.
He's attacking to get the ball soft and easy runs to put pressure on.
Ever heard about the guy named Virender Sehwag?
You mean the guy we mention in the video. That Virender Sehwag. Sometimes it pays to watch.
Sad that Cook and WG Grace didn’t learn from Duckett. If they did, perhaps Jarrod would have mentioned them in a little more detail than he did.
are we just gonna ignore the fact that jarrod cooked gambhir LMAO
On strike rate. Hard to argue that one. Even if you're a politician.
@@JarrodKimberYT llol lol he resigned just last week
To focus on his KKR management responsibilities
I fear you forgot about Cook boss
He so the graph. Use your eyes
@@JarrodKimberYT please accept my apology.
@@JarrodKimberYTuse our eyes? Who do you think we are, peasant?
It's no surprise the rise of Duckett's career has coincided with the rise of Engalnd's bazball approach. Both took the opposition by surprise and made the most of it. The challenge for both is the same now that the surprise factor is not there anymore. Good test teams will be better prepared as they know how Duckett and England are going to play. We saw both reverting to a much more conservative style of cricket in the last test match after they had two consecutive losses. England's current approach and Duckett's game would really be tested in further losses. It will be interesting to see how he reacts going further as it is very evident that his defence isn't half as good as his sweeps.
Legends say never judge a player in a short term.
"geoff boycott" and "brighter cricket" in the same sentence...
Boycs bowled off spin and medium pace. He was the dour Sobers.
Ben duckett rides his luck in initial phase(lots of play and misses),
That is exactly what he's doing. But by hitting boundaries teams take out the catchers.
Cook, Strauss, Atherton, Vaughan?
How do Rohit and Jaiswal compare?
Cook?
I can cook, yes
No Alastair Cook?
Pretty sure he's on the graphs and mentioned a couple of times.
@JarrodKimberYT Just thought he'd be one of the guys mentioned on your intro 🤷
It gives the impression that you rate all those guys you specifically mention at the start ahead of him, that's all.
Flat pitches are playing a big role here
Cook???
Cook is on the graph. Cook is mentioned later. Many great openers are not mentioned, did you think there might be a reason Strauss, Cook, Tresco were not mentioned. I was showing how ancient England having great opening is. If I read the names of every great opener from England we'd have been here all day. I didn't even mention Grace.
It should be called bragball 😂😂
5th test says otherwise 28 0
AI visuals were really out of pocket this episode.
Was their AI in this?
COOK??????? COOK IS NOT A GOOD OPENER????????
He is. Believe it not, others are too.
Over confident opener !! 😂 everybody learnt cricket from him even sachin and Lara
hey hey not even played 20 tests please hold
for content purpose dont drop like these
looking silly to me
use me unsub
I mean these guys have been tested against the best. They have even scored against India in India consistently, almost always giving their team a good start only for their middle order to shat the bed xD. The only place left would be Australia and given this time Ashes in England took place on flat pitches with considerable bounce on some pitches especially Lord's, I think it's safe to make a case for them now as longevity is the only metric they need to be tested against, and in cricket, we do talk about cricketers that impressed despite having short careers.
Also, no offense but if Jarrod really wanted to make a video for views, then making one on India/IPL would just bring in much more views mate.
@@Badabung-vu9wr 1 century in 4 games in India, 20s and 30s don't make you a consistent worldclass opener.
Remember Ajantha Mendis? How he disappeared when people figured him out? Duckett's funeral would happen in Australia when Hazlewood's length ball would go above his head
@@syedarsalanahmad Yeah, you are right. He is not a consistent opener, but that's the thing...he doesn't need to be. Crawley is his nemesis as a player who is all about consistently scoring in the 40s and 50s and rarely going on to make a big score. That's why these two work so well together. They almost always guarantee a good start with one player having the potential to go on to make a big score.
Your point of teams figuring him out really just goes back to the question of longevity I made earlier. This short form success at the international level shows they belong here. From here on, it's just a case of them continuously believing in it and improving which sounds easy but quite frankly is the hardest thing to do.
As for 1 century in 4 games in India, I mean....we are talking about India right? That is a really really good achievement for a player not to mention an opener for that matter. What's more? It was a daddy hundred and the stupid way he got out just shows that he could have gone on to a potential double.
Also, by no means do I mean to say that he is world class. That last metric is what he needs to succeed at in order to reach that level.
The point isn't how many tests he's played , it's how different he has been. He could do that in one series and we cover it.
@@syedarsalanahmad you dont undertsand what this team is trying to do, 20's and 30's at a run a ball IS consistent within this system. look how many times this team is 10 for 2 or even 25 for 2, they havent been, they get to 40-50 for none off ten overs, thats EXACTLY what they want them to do. I know its complicated and different for a traditional fan like yourself to understand but they dont want the openers to get 100 off 300 deliveries, they want to be aggressive and put the opposition opening bowlers on the back foot in the first session. he has achieved that consistently in this seris.