Paleontology News: How Sauropods Grew So Big

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 27. 08. 2024

Komentáře • 57

  • @andreaslois3074
    @andreaslois3074 Před 7 lety +44

    what-the-heck-a-saurus

  • @Niidea1986
    @Niidea1986 Před 7 lety +12

    What-the-heck-o-saurus...I hope some paleontologist actually names a dinosaur like that.

    • @aaronjimenez7825
      @aaronjimenez7825 Před 5 lety

      That has to be the name of the next crazy dinosaur discovered.

  • @polishedxgamergta5402
    @polishedxgamergta5402 Před 6 lety +6

    im going to find that what the heck a saurus

  • @jsfbr
    @jsfbr Před 3 lety

    Short + very informative = perfect video! Thanks!

  • @vojtechslezak4553
    @vojtechslezak4553 Před 6 lety +3

    Whatheheckosaurus made my day xD

  • @mexicanmuslim
    @mexicanmuslim Před 7 lety +9

    Yeah dinosaurs are giant, But in movies they are Exaggerated!! For example T-Rex's mouth is not big enough for you to lay in and have a laptop in there. Movies have people swallowed whole by T-rex's.
    ITs big yes. Not that big. No average human could fit in a T-Rex's mouth.
    I know its fictional but it gives people a false sense of how big dinos really were.

    • @australianwhiteibis6055
      @australianwhiteibis6055 Před 7 lety +2

      Jurassic park toilet scene. Most iconic scene of a tyrannosaurus eating a human whole

    • @australianwhiteibis6055
      @australianwhiteibis6055 Před 7 lety

      Wholesome XX it shook him a couple of times and swallowed him

    • @woolfyx
      @woolfyx Před 6 lety +4

      Not really. Jurassic Park T.Rex is around the same size as Sue, maybe slightly bigger which is accurate because slightly bigger examples of those species almost definitely existed.

    • @woolfyx
      @woolfyx Před 6 lety +5

      Mosasaurus or Stegosaurus, however, are vastly oversized.

    • @polishedxgamergta5402
      @polishedxgamergta5402 Před 6 lety

      not stegosaurus maybe in height mosasaurs was only over sized by a couple feet using the biggest one found

  • @kahlilme2025
    @kahlilme2025 Před 7 lety +8

    I kinda doubt Amphiocelias ever existed. Being that Cope named it. And we know how those times were.

    • @petersmythe6462
      @petersmythe6462 Před 7 lety +2

      Yeah, but the fact that Marsh acknowledged it was real seems to be evidence it was. I suspect that it was simply chunkier than people realize, and therefore not as long. More like 45 or so meters.

    • @kahlilme2025
      @kahlilme2025 Před 7 lety +1

      Peter Smythe
      Seeing as we only had an incomplete drawing of a backbone, I still have my doubts.

    • @marcoar3109
      @marcoar3109 Před 7 lety

      Wholesome You´re the one who needs to educate fossilworks.org/bridge.pl?a=taxonInfo&taxon_no=53180

    • @abdulazizrex
      @abdulazizrex Před 6 lety

      TyrannosaurusLives, I am very confident of it’s existence!

    • @shockal7269
      @shockal7269 Před 6 lety

      Tyrannosauridae are well dead and extinct. Anyways, continuing the main topic, I agree that Amphiocelias may have been massively over-sized.

  • @t-man5196
    @t-man5196 Před 5 lety

    Lol that triceratops lying on its stomach at 0:10 is way bigger than we have evidence to suggest they got. The one to the right of it is more in line with their upper size-bracket.

  • @patrickmcdonald8513
    @patrickmcdonald8513 Před 4 lety

    Amazing. Thanks!

  • @polishedxgamergta5402
    @polishedxgamergta5402 Před 6 lety +2

    u don't deserve 3.5k you deserve 2000000000000000000000000000000k

  • @lorettaomalley5985
    @lorettaomalley5985 Před 4 lety

    What the heck a saur picture was actually a fan made picture or the scale of amphicoeliae

  • @unnamedentity5834
    @unnamedentity5834 Před 5 lety

    I don't know why but your outro music creeps me out.

  • @kingboom6559
    @kingboom6559 Před 4 lety

    wow

  • @tristanhelgerson7964
    @tristanhelgerson7964 Před 6 lety

    What's the name of the first lost sauropod, I can't figure out how to spell it

  • @insaneangel8469
    @insaneangel8469 Před 7 lety +1

    Hi

  • @COVID-19_Crab
    @COVID-19_Crab Před 7 lety +1

    Created Using PowToon

  • @backdrop8469
    @backdrop8469 Před 7 lety

    Is it true that some sauropods had two hearts?

    • @creakingskull7008
      @creakingskull7008 Před 7 lety

      No

    • @unnamedentity5834
      @unnamedentity5834 Před 5 lety

      no but there's so much herbivores that has 2 brains , one brain inside their skull , other is inside thair hips. Because their brains are too small compared to their bodies so one brain can't contol the whole body.

  • @raymondminton6388
    @raymondminton6388 Před 6 lety

    An informative presentation, the use of the non-existent word "ginormity" being the only sour note.

    • @somedude140
      @somedude140 Před 6 lety +1

      All words were nonexistant at one point or another. Alot of people don't seem to realize that language is something we just made up and that we can change it in any way we want to. Point is, you understood the meaning, so it's a word now.

  • @lorettaomalley5985
    @lorettaomalley5985 Před 4 lety

    S

  • @australianwhiteibis6055

    Sauropods were huge, but they weren't blue whale sized Titans. How big is argentinosaurus? 70-100 tonnes? A whale can double that.
    Personally I'd love to see them find some more evidence of the Broome titanosaur, which is possibly the same size as amphicoelias fragillimus, if not larger

    • @aizaratem
      @aizaratem Před 7 lety +5

      Professor Bin chicken hey! But don't confuse size with weight , a blue whale can reach 30 meters but the biggest sauropod could double that!.

    • @australianwhiteibis6055
      @australianwhiteibis6055 Před 7 lety +2

      Size is weight. The largest animal on land is the elephant, but there's snakes that can grow longer and giraffes grow taller. The largest animal ever is the blue whale, its more than double the weight of argentinosaurus despite argentinosaurus growing about 10 metres longer. Even if we had confirmed that amphicoelias fragillimus existed the blue whale would still be about 70 tonnes heavier

    • @marcoar3109
      @marcoar3109 Před 7 lety

      fossilworks.org/bridge.pl?a=taxonInfo&taxon_no=53180 A. Fragillimus = A. Altus = 25 meters long Diplodocid.

    • @Texasmade74
      @Texasmade74 Před 7 lety

      Sydney's Feathered bin rat Actually there are some sauropods that not grow longer than the blue whale but much heavier too

    • @Texasmade74
      @Texasmade74 Před 7 lety

      Wholesome XX So then i was right about there being Sauropod that were both heavier and longer than the blue whale?

  • @tweetysworld52
    @tweetysworld52 Před 5 lety

    Fake.