Justice For All with Judge Cristina Perez: Snowfall & A Ballsy Proposal

A competitive snowball fight leads to an eye injury; Woman seeks payment for the elaborate marriage proposal she was hired to arrange.
Welcome to Justice Central, the ultimate destination for your court TV cravings! ⚖️✨ Dive into the fascinating world of Justice with our lineup of nine incredible court TV shows. From dramatic rulings to heartfelt justice, we've got it all.
Justice Central lineup of Judges includes Supreme Justice with Judge Karen, America's Court with Judge Ross, Justice for the People with Judge Milian, We the People with Judge Lauren Lake, The Verdict with Judge Hatchett, Mathis Court with Judge Mathis, Equal Justice with Judge Eboni K Williams, Justice for All with Judge Cristina Perez, and Justice with Judge Mablean.
Don't miss a single case - find all of these captivating shows right here on Justice Central's CZcams channel, as well as on The Grio and your local TV listings. Subscribe now to stay up-to-date with the latest courtroom drama and legal showdowns! Justice awaits ⚖️
Follow Justice Central across the web:
Instagram: /
Facebook: / justicecentraltv
TikTok: / justicecentral

[@redapol5678]

It’s all fun and games until someone hurts their eye 😅

[@jacquelinecassidy7672]

10 years hell I would have left after 3

[@kingderphead]

He obviously got defrauded

[@redapol5678]

How? You think the cousin _made_ money out of this? She was only paid back what she spent. At the end of the day, she was no better off than if she had told him she wouldn’t help. It was the girlfriend’s fault. Cousin only relayed what the girlfriend said “I don’t think he’s committed enough”. Blame the girlfriend for not being clearer 🤷‍♂️

[@gme671]

He was defrauded because she wanted his business knowing his girlfriend was unhappy....wrong verdict 👎

[@CeltycSparrow]

I find it hilariously ironic that the plaintiff's surname is Hassle and the defendant's is Happy and the plaintiff is hassling the judge and the defendant and whining....over a snowball fight. If ya'll were in a snowball fight and he was throwing ice at you, why didn't you walk away from him, if it hurt so much? YOU CHOSE to continue playing in the snow with him...by your own admission....for an hour...and you even admit that the game was intense, but you were both laughing and having fun playing in the snow. I'm sure you were firing snowballs back at him just as hard as he was. So how is that his problem when you were both laughing and at ANY point during that hour-long snowball fight you could have gone inside and stopped playing? It sounds to me like you were bested in a snowball fight and now you are whining about it and being a sore loser. And how can you prove it was the snowball that gave you a corneal abrasion and not something else? Do you have a doctor's report saying that was the cause? Or is that your assumption because he turned you into a snowman? You are just being a sore loser. And the plaintiff is not denying it when the defendant asserts that he DID stop once he realized that his friend was being serious. The defendant admits that the plaintiff asked him to stop more than once, but he was laughing at the same time, and when he stopped laughing and was serious, his friend immediately stopped. That makes sense to me. This was an accident, plain and simple. If you KNOW your friend is intense and competitive in sports and you don't like playing with him because you get hurt, then simply don't put yourself in that situation to begin with. No one forced you to have a snowball fight with him.

[@leonidasspyropoulos849]

I understand that both plaintiff and defendant did not anticipate that the fresh snow would have solid parts that could hurt someone. If it crossed their mind they would have said to the other to be cautious and not aim at the face. So I think it is not fair that the defendant paid the full amount.