Continental TerrainContact A/T - 55,000 Mile Review
Vložit
- čas přidán 31. 10. 2021
- Forgot to mention road noise is minimal. More than your average all season but less than most AT tires. A solid option for 3 season use. (Wet, Gravel, Dirt, Pavement, Light Mud)
Not a tire I would go with for 4 season use as winter performance is poor.
I also recommend you do not go with any A/T tire for winter (snowflake rated or not), even the most budget-friendly winter tires outperform the highest end A/T tires.
Were they smooth at very high speed? (No vibration or balancing issues?)
Yes, no issues at 95mph
what are you going to replace the Continential's with?
Likely a Load range C or E tires in the same size. Options are limited in C, Grabber ATX or BFG K02s, but would be a more comfy ride while being sturdier than these SL rated tires. If i do go with Load range E, I think itll be too rough of a ride. Well also see what sales are going on in the spring.
@@rippinrogers ... agree, Load E would be to stiff. But, if you don't need anything more than the SL, then stick with those. It's not like you can (or should) overload ur vehicle anyway.
@@biz4twobiz463 Thats the thing thats a little odd when using the SL XL C D E F rating to compare. I've seen load Range C tires with a 113 load rating. And then these tires in the video are SL rated and have a 115 load rating. So while both are above the stock 108 load rating, the C range tire, which I would assume is capable of carrying more weight than the SL tires, is rated to carry less.
If I were to gt a Load Range E tire the load rating will likley be 118/121, all these load ratings are at max tire pressure and i doubt ill ever run any tire over 40-50 psi.
@@rippinrogers ... yes, it's very confusing and weird how they rate the tires. Maybe the unicorn tire for you should be a Load D. haha Well, good luck either way.
Hey bro you got your money's worth already