House of Habsburg II - Plus Ultra
Vložit
- čas přidán 24. 02. 2023
- Took a while to make, but here it is, part 2 of our series on the House of Habsburg.
Sources:
Benjamin Curtis (2013). The Habsburgs: The History of a Dynasty. Bloomsbury Academic
Henry Kamen(2005). Spain, 1469-1714: A Society of Conflict. Routledge
Written by Andrew Szekler - Zábava
The clash between Charles V and Suleiman I is one of the most anticlimactic event in history. A pitched battle between the two would be epic.
Charles avoided a clash while Suleiman sought one. Had Charles died, Francis would do to Castile what Ferdinand did to Hungary.
@@ChevyChase301 After the decisive Battle of Mohacs, Charles knew he couldn’t face Suleiman on land head on. But he was forced to face him when Suleimam marched to Vienna a second time yet both because he was slow to raise an army and Suleiman wasted his time on Güns the only chance for them to have a personal battle was lost. Charles failed on his African and Mediterraen campaigns while Suleiman failed in Italy and German lands seperately.
Both wasted a lot of resources gaining not much and died without achieving their ambitions but ruining each other’s careers lol.
@@rohansensei5708 but both considered one of the best rivals in history
@@salehalmandeel4374 their rivalry is like anime couples not even kissing once even though anime is over with no second season
Lots of tension barely any action
@@rohansensei5708 he can be a political rivalry like Hitler and Stalin and your example is one of the funniest examples I ever heard
Charles got all of these realms and with the exception of hungary kept it all together. He went into massive debt to fight off enemies and expand influence, which is what a ruler is supposed to do. So over all very respectable ruler just not the equal of the emperors you'd have to compare him too (Charlemagne/ Napoleon). As for the reformation and colonialism, those always struck me as things that happened and not something he could have really done much about.
The reformation would have happend regardles yes. But could it have been dealt with differently? Could the massive bloodshed inside the empire be avoided? Much more interesting questions, and I think the questions Charles V agonized over in his late life.
Drive your country into debt and expand influence? Lmao those should not be top priority for a ruler
Charles was never King of Hungary or had much influence on the events that fragmented Hungary
@@dakapo8985 The real indispensible man that explains how the way the reformation happened I think was Martin Luther. Without him, the late medieval church's decline as a political and spiritual institution would have resulted in several national churches that more and more became independent from it. It was Luther's uncannily intuitive use of the (not that) new information technology of the printing press that allowed his ideas to spread so quickly, he was erudite and rational while being entertaining and accesible to the "general public", something he kind of help come into existence because while literacy was raising, it was mostly a utilitarian skill (reading the Bible or double entry bookeeping) but reading for entertainment or for self-edification came about with the pamphlet industry that Luther kickstarted. In a way Charles could have acted differently mostly on how to deal With Luther.
So if Luther is the key the question revolves around how to deal with him but this again presents us with the limits of Charles as emperor of the HRO (eand every other Holy Roman Emperor). Do you kill him? No, he is under the direct protection of Frederick the Wise (good nove that's why they'll call you "the wise") and you won't risk more conflict within the empire. Do you restrict the use of the printing pess on the empire? Well, see that would help but, how would go about doing that? The HRE doesn't have a single printing center like London in England. The industry is scattered so you can't quickly control what happens if printers want to go rogue. Moreover printers are status symbols for some princes so you also risk alienating them if you prohibit them from having one.
So you can't stop this wave of text telling people "hey did you know ypu're getting scammed and your father's soul didn't actually get less years in purgatory?" or "hey you can actually have a cheaper church because nothing in the Bible says anything about paying to a Catholic Church in Rome?" or "here is the actual way to save your inmortal soul acording to the true word of God" or whatever appealed to the many kinds of literate and people who went to listen to tracts throughout the empire. That's my interpretation of the events there.
Now as for the Peasants Revolt (the actual bloodshed), I mean. historians still argue if it was caused by the religious ideas of the reformation or if the reformation merely gave an identity to their longstanding discontents. I think it was mostly the second but the reformation did bring this Catholic vs Reformed outlook that made violence worse and in some sense counterproductive to the paesants goals because instead of looking at their situation as the result of being oppresed by a higher class (their feudal lords) they saw it mostly on religious terms which pitted them against their fellow (but Catholic) paesants.
The fact that the second chapter in this series only covered one ruler should be a testament to just how important Charles V was to the Habsburg family, and how none of them, before or after, would have as much of an impact.
Charles V was an effective ruler overall given the sheer size of his territories and the threats he faced.
House of Habsburg II the Chination of ULTRA CHIN Begins
PreQuel
I love the spanish motto, alongside the austrian one "A.E.I.O.U." Austriae est imperare orbi universo ("All the world is subject to Austria")
This is a common myth, in reality the Austrian Habsburg motto AEIOU is inspired by the sound made when taking direct damage to your small toe and testicles at the same time
@@surroundgatari pfff
How many eu4 players we got in the comments? Austrian gang rise up!
Skanderbeg gang
Lorraine is more fun to play.
@@tysonclark5974 bruh who tf has ever played Lorraine
@@Little_Compy some people might have
Papal States gang represent!
The conquest of Mexico during Charles’ reign is one of the defining moments of the early modern era. It made the Spanish empire the first real empire in the Western Hemisphere.
You know you have a great dynasty when ever member is born with a chad chin.
If you could, please mention the order of the golden fleece! I think it’s really interesting bonus info about the Habsburgs!
Turks trying to explain how there were 200,000 hungarians at Mohacs (Louis borrowed Xerxes's clone machine)(it was an underdog story)
Alexander the Great had like 100 soldiers vs 500 thousand Persians you mean
My perspective on that sudden outburst of knowledge :🗿
Europeans explaining how every crusade against Ottomans was 5.000 Hungarian, 2.000 Wallachian, 500 Venetian, 100 Albanian and 5 Croat (who mainly did all the job) against 300.000 Turks 150.000 Crimean Tatar and 10.000 Serbian
@@rohansensei5708 Chinese explaining how both Europeans and ottomans are barbaric while fighting a 10 way civil war with 200 million casualties on each side and the Yangtze River flooded which caused another 100 million death(it was merely 1% of the population)
While abdicating, Charles V leaned on on of his favourites; William, the Prince of Orange. The Prince who would, some years later, lead the Dutch Revolt against Phillip II and become one of the main causes of the decline of Habsburg power in Europe.
Hre emperor ranking when
HRE history is mad boring.
You forgot the great rise of ULM who conquered half of europe
ULM?
What if the Habsburgs never reigned in Spain? Can be if: 1. Juan de Trastamara didn't die young, 2. Manuel of Portugal, inherited all kingdoms, or 3. Juana, mother of Charles was made Queen and never married a foreign family, making her the ruling Queen as was tradition in Spain for women to inherit kingdoms and be crowned on their own to extend the family.
disgusting
The Spanish Empire would probably have never existed due to the Castile and Aragon sperating.
Los Ausburgo , Su herencia, fue la ruina de Castilla y de España. 😢🤨😑
@@theforbiddenpotato8032 Castilla no Necesitaba a Aragón para tener su Imperio. Aragón nunca pago impuestos para el Imperio ni Navarra ni Vascongadas . Solo pagaban impuestos los castellanos. Eso se acabó con los Borbones.
Fun fact when England invaded France with Spain Spain didn’t invade which meant England had to go home because they waited for like a year for Spain though they did take a bit of france
It's funny that Charles and Sulaiman were both the peaks of their empires.
Hello, could you, sometime in future, make a video about Charles IV of Bohemia, Holy Roman emperor? Or at least about the kings of Bohemia in general?
Hey Spectrum... maybe for the next video you do a list of Rulers from worst to be, you should do Scotland...
From Kenneth I, to James VI, there were 42 rulers... while after Kenneth I up to Malcolm II ( with the exception of Constantine II, there are some records of him) there are very few historical records, that still leaves more than 25 rulers to list, and I think it can be a great video idea, since you've done England and Great Britain... why not do Scotland as well...
Or maybe a Scandinavian Monarchy, but that might be a bit difficult for Norway since after Olav IV, it had been under the rule of either Denmark or Sweden for more than 500 years...
And not to mention how Norway's Succession worked where every son whether legitimate or not, had an equal claim for the Norwegian throne, with plunged the kingdoms into many civil wars and rival kings for over a century... so maybe put Norway off for now....
Just an idea, since your lists on European rulers from worst to best are my favorite videos to see on your channel...
Please keep continuing with the Spanish Habsburgs!
Amazing!
Hey Spectrum! Are you planning on making a video about Polish kings ?
It would have been hilarious if you told the casualties of the Battle of Bicocca
Please make a video ranking every Safavid Shah from worst to best
Could you PLEASE do a ranking on the holy roman emperors PLS it would be so nice to See your opinion on the different emperors
Although it was widely held that 'the Turk' was militarily superior to the West, the major Habsburg weakness was financial. As a rule, the Estates of the various lands were reluctant to vote adequate tributes to raise a powerful army.
Financial... not genetic?
@@moritamikamikara3879 yes their main weakness was financial
I remember a contemporary claimed that while Charles was more powerful, he envied Francis’ centralized state. Castile and Brabant and Naples all being independent but in Union was the cause of this.
Henry VIII , Francis I, Charles and Sulieman all ruled in the same time period, really cool coincidence.
Charles V kind of looks like Gigachad.
Royal Chin
yea when the habsburgs are ugly in dont want to know how the ptolemies looked lmao
can u plz do a video ranking the US presidents? I would love to see ur opinion.
PLVS VLTRA
The eternal frenchman trying not to team up with roaches challenge [IMPOSSIBLE]
Charles V : "my plans to conquer EUrope have failed... how can the Habsburgs be remembered forever ?"
Charles V's descendants : "what about incest... a lot of incest ?"
I'm part of the faction wanting a video ranking holy roman emperors
You’ve ranked the Spanish kings. Now you could rank the Caliphs of Córdoba and the Kings of Castile. You could even do Aragon, or Granada
Make a ranking of HRE emperors, including Charlemagne, also 7 years war tier list
Part 3?
Do a monarch ranking
Être fort comme un Turc (‘to be strong like a turk’):
This expression originates in the 15th century when the Turks had a reputation for being strong, almost unbeatable warriors due to their numerous victories. At the time, the Ottoman Empire ruled large parts of south-east Europe, north Africa and western Asia. It is said that François I, King of France, was gifted Turkish armour by Suleiman the Magnificent (the tenth and most famous sultan of the Ottoman Empire) during their alliance. When he wore it, he is said to have exclaimed: “Here I am now, strong as a Turk!”.
Bro dropped his own No Stylist + (Ultra)
That hat man 😂
Damn even before Germany, France and Germany hated each other.
you left out how when he retired he moved to a monastery to drink beer and banned women from coming close to it.
Uhhh semper fidelis 🦅🌎⚓️
Do the house of borbon
Carlos V, very delicious chocolate.
AEIOU
The funnymem
PYRRHIC WARS WHEN
Hmm even before Napoleon, in his respective era wasn't Louis XIV's military power comparable with the dominant position Charles V had ? Even if he was generally contained, Louis XIV fought several European-wide coalitions.
Do a video ranking every Egyptian pharoah or every Chinese emperor.
I quadruple dare you.
Yo dude, Ottomans never conquered the entire kingdom of Croatia. More precision with maps ;)
If Mehmet the conquer besiegt vienna he would have won
Agree
No xd