Reupload, this time all points are present! www.patreon.com/peRFecttennis For those who want to support my channel and enjoy the highlights that cannot be uploaded to YT (and the full version of those present with cuts)
Wonderful match, thanks for the reupload! I was wondering, do you have any of these matches: vs Lacko at AO 2011, vs Basilashvili at AO 2016, vs Soderling at WB 2009, vs Beck at USO 2010 or vs Monfils at RG 2015? If you have any of these, I would like to see any of them one day. I don't want to be a wish pig, so if you want to put just one of those that you have on your list, I'm happy! Once again, thank you for all your work and passion!
He was also younger and in his prime. Joker was not yet in his prime and when Joker made it to his prime, Fed was winding down, like all great players do.
mononucleosis drastically affected Federer's career. If you compare his physical attributes (power, speed, etc.) of Wimby 2007 final to Wimby 2008/09 finals, or from USO 2007 final, to USO 2008/09 finals, you can easily notice how much power he had lost in his strokes and isn't moving as fluid or fast as he was during 2007.
`I find it a more than a little boring when the opponent forces a baseline slugfest on Federer But it's the only final, so people show up and sit through it and cheer.
It's crazy. Including Federers first Grand Slam Win, there have been 74 of the big Tournaments. Just thinking that the Big Three Nadal, Federer and Djokovic won 61 from those 74 is just so unreal. Such a Dominance. Overall there have only been 11 different Winners since Wimbledon 2003. I don't think we will ever see something comparable in Tennis.
Roddick, Murray, Wawrinka, Del Potro, Cilic, Thiem and Medvedev were the only ones to win at least one Grand Slam during the Big 3 era. Edit: also Gaudio and I don't remember the other 3 Slam winners.
Weakest era in tennis from year 2005 to year 2012 ( Federer won many spams) & the Super MOST WEAKEST ERA from year 2013 to year 2025 ( Nadal & Djoker winning almost all slams , both winning 25 slams each. This is the disgrace to this sport & shame. Strongest ERA in tennis - 1975 to 2004, where multiple slam many winners were there
@@devasundarchatpublicityas9472 What you mean is likely most competitive in the sense that it was anyone’s taking for a slam. The other two “weak” eras were simply dominated by the big three.
@@fifa3 He thought of him as a puny next gen who would fizzle out just like the rest and he'd remain at the top, and now 8-7,40-15 has happened and djokers made him cry and has won more slams than him lol love to see that arrogant uppity fed put in his place.
@@user-cy6xl3vd3f For not liking Federer? You Federer fans are something lmao. The arrogance you have to believe anyone who dislikes Federer is mentally ill is astounding.
I've been going back and watching these prior matches. This confirms that when Fed was 25 (his prime), Djoker could not beat him. Djoker was there with the skills and speed at 20. Remember that Fed had to beat Sampras at 19-20 age. So why can't Djoker do that?? Why did Djoker had to wait til Fed was about 30 to win? This to me clearly means Fed is GOAT. When skills are that close, the slight edge in age / agility is huge.
@@MrTomNguyen Yes! & even though Nadal & Djoko are the same age, Nadal was consistently challenging & beating prime Federer, but djoko was a puppy in front of prime Federer.
@@MrTomNguyen Fed missed the opportunity of winning a lot of matches against Rafa at the US Open, I still think overall Novak prime was the best of the 3 , can't decide between Fed and Rafa
@@rishbahpandey8697 Saying the one basically achieving nothing in life and btw Djokoshit is since mid 2021 not relevant anymore so not that much better either lol 🤣🤣🤣
Not at the moment, but to insinuate Roger serve was really good and somehow it's not anymore since the last time he played is ridiculous..let's see when Roger comes back one last time..
@@MKD1101 Its partly true though . Also as federer started to age he got worse , whereas Novak got better . Which is why Novak always started defeating federer imo.
The way Federer played here was quite different than the past few years. The court or the ball were playing faster it seemed. While Djokovic was already showing some glimpses of his powerful returns.
2007 is always my favorite version of Fed. Also, this ultra aggressive version of Djokovic is quite weird. He's very aggressive against Nadal every time they play, but nothing like this raw aggression here
@@mickaellandry9726 current Nole is definitely better then 2007 Nole, but I wish he could somehow be as good as he is now and be aggressive like 2007 Nole.
Its crazy how much someones form can change at the top level. You could tell djokovic had what it takes to win but it was the small things in his form ans serve he was lacking then but has now. He's much more efficient and consistent with all aspects of his game more now than he was when he started the tour. This is coming from a federer fan i don't exactly "suuport" djokovic but you can admire his progression and dedication
Я не думаю, что это на 100% так. Да, что то Джокович усилил, но и тогда в 2007 он тоже дошел до этого финала. Как? Его теннис и тогда был очень неплох. Но.. тогда Федерер был лучше. Я бы сказал так, что тот Роджер, из 2007, уничтожил бы Новака в любом матче, но возраст и медленные корты сделали свое дело.
Lol fed almost beat joker in 2015 uso he just could not convert the heap of BPs he had. Fed was way off his hay years and joker was in his prime still when Fed gets he close to A game, joker starts panting like a bitch. Watch the full match, it will open up your eyes
2007 and Djokovic was already third seed at age 20, a few months away from his first grand slam, he was the "next gen" back then, nowadays I had waited for years for many "nest gen" to step up and they still cant, the tour was stronger and healthier in those days
@@kiklocus4660 Those guys are the best in tennis history. What was Jordan doing when he was over 35, now Messi and Ronaldo over 35... Some people r just whole other level
Federer hitting those days was smooth as silk but still massively destroying guys on the other side of the net. Djokovic's aggressiveness is gone today.
Djokovic doesn’t need to hit aggressively nowadays though. With the slowed down surfaces and the young guys being mostly nutcases, he can just play wall and let the other guy self-destruct.
Djokovic's aggressiveness is not gone at all. He has played smarter over the last decade than 2007. Djokovic doesn't just wait for any unforced errors from his opponents. That's the typical fake narrative spreading by his haters. *Djokovic is an aggressive baseline player.* He likes to be in control and dictate play. Novak rely on the strength of his groundstrokes to move opponents around the court and aggressively goes for winners from the back of the court. He attacks short balls in the court, and takes the chance at making a few unforced errors in order to hit That's how he won 20GS, 354 weeks as #1, 35 masters1000 and 7 ending season as #1. 🎾🥇🏆 You can't have 25 victories or more in career against respectively Nadal & Federer without aggressiveness. That's a absurd and salty statement....
As a fan of Djokovic, I think you're right. He changed his style to present more consistency instead of aggressiveness. It doesn't mean that he just hits the ball back and waits for opponent's errors. He becomes the classic counter style player, which is the most effective or dangerous style in tennis nowadays.
Federer in 2009 AO was awesome as well. Only struggled against an in-form Berdych before the final. He had perhaps his best (or 2nd best) performance ever against Delpo for example. It was just that Nadal was running as if mobsters were threatening to kill his family or sth. He was returning pretty much everything. His matches against Roger and even more against Verdasco showcased perhaps the best defense i have ever seen.
@@jay_kulina I agree prime Nadal is the best defender (speed, mobility, anticipation and furiously strong counters) but based on their whole career, Djokovicis better
I wanted to see more epic rallies, ironically though these guys are so good that they are going to put you away right away. Short points with the highest level of precision, accuracy and power.
The most fearful thing about this federer was he would not miss any chance to attack, all his forehand shots are going for a winner and this guy could produce them all day, no matter how much you defend the ball, the game wouldn't become any slower and you won't have a chance to recover, you would have to create an opening or push him back to win the point, he smashes all the lobs, kill almost all the balls at the net, a god like unpredictable serve.I guess that's why there were only Nadal and Davydenko who beat federer in the entire 2006, Such a monster Kudos to Novak, his game is so destructive here, he is competing so well, he had his chances in both the sets, I think he wasn't mentally strong back then. I think his 2011 version is the evolved version of this level. Nowadays he doesn't play even close to this level and relies on other player's mistakes, not a bad strategy but less entertaining lol. Anyways brilliant match.
Roger, you've been the most talented tennis player I've ever seen in my life. No Borg no Mcenroe no Sampras no Nadal no Djokovic: you've been the greatest. Thanks for everything you've done on the tennis courts. You've been the class & the elegance made man.
@@sfhnnx3 no, not really. Results don't tell the whole story. The H2H is a good example, Djokovic leads Fed but most of their matches (+60%) were played during or after Novak's prime (he also avoids Roger in 2017 but Roger didn't avoid Novak in 2013). And courts slowing down has also been a huge factor in Djokovic and Nadal's dominance for at least 7-8 years (2008-2016). I don't think either of them are better players than Federer (and honestly most people agree that the Swiss has the better technique out of all three), but the game became a lot more physical for several years leading to endless grinding favoring both successors. And I say this as a Nadal fan. Btw, I don't like Djokovic as a symbol, the guy is a douche, but if I actually believed he was more gifted than Roger I wouldn't have a problem admitting to it.
This match is the reason why Djokovic has beaten Federer many times in slams. He missed many opportunities in this match and learned from it. The same leads that Djokovic blew in this match, Federer would blow for many matches afterwards.
Federer was physically in peak form then and his muscle power probably at his own peak too. Believe it or not that decreases a lot past 30 with age in elite sports especially with Federer's power, aggressive and pin-pointed accuracy based game. Of course Djokovic improved by leaps and bounds too. On grass again Federer could get him, 2012 with whatever power he had left since grass is technically a faster surface. But then it was one-sided in slams from then on until 2019 (Federer lost but it was closer than any match). That was because Federer changed his racquet, and style and tactics. I know and believe that as beautiful as it looks, Federer's single-handed backhander is his Achilles heel. Most players learnt and exploited it a lot.
@@sagniksingha yes he is not in prime, but the level was close and he has wayy more experience. He played well enough to get to matchpoints. If anytrhing, age should be an advantage at crucial points since you have more experience. But Fed hasnt learnt his lessons, while Djokovic did here. Fed lost 24 matches having mps, compared to Djoko 3.
Absolutely no doubt about it. Federer remains my favourite player, but I would rate Novak's post-match sportsmanship over that of everybody else, including the Swiss.
It was a great final. I remember the RF "black knight" of the 2007 US Open following the "white knight" at Wimbledon. And Djokovic was already a very strong up and coming player who was starting to threaten RF.
It's crazy how at 2:03 whenever you saw prime Federer get fed a shot like that to his forehand, you basically just knew the point was over. His forehand was of another world. I also can't believe how much Djokovic choked in this match. He could have won this. He was up 6-5, 40-0 on his serve in the first set, choked, got broken, and lost in the tiebreak. In the 2nd set he was up 4-1, and lost that set in a tiebreak as well. The 3rd set he just lost clean, but this match could have easily had Djokovic up 2 sets to 0.
I can think that after playing his first final in a Grand Slam and losing it to the one who was the best player of the moment, Nole could only think that one day he would try to win as much as he did and be considered a tennis legend.
Federer fans can deny all they want but djokovic has improved a lot since then. There is much less opportunity to attack his shots these days and his decision making is miles better.
Lol djokovic fans can deny all u want. Peakest of the peak of prime djokovic lost to grandpa fed in 2011 french open. If they meet at their respective peaks.. U know hu wins.. Lol!
Miss the wide open Arthur Ashe Stadium, despite the roof being better in case of bad weather. The acoustics and echoing of the shots along with the umpire calls across the massive stadium were majestic back then!
This match shows how athleticism and power (and a good return) just don't cut it against a player who just masters every aspect of the game of tennis. Not even counting this match, Head to Head stats counted fairly, namely in the years where they were both in their prime, 2008-2012 Djokovic: 11 Federer: 12
No, it's just a result of court speed. Courts have become so homogenous now that people forget how much difference that used to make and how much of a different game you needed to win on grass vs clay. Novak simply couldn't play the way he plays now due to how fast the courts were. This hurt Federer as time went on and helped Nadal and Novak. For example, no way Nadal wins a single Wimbledon if courts were kept as fast as they were in the 90s. Novak maybe not either. For further evidence of court speed making a difference, look at how an old near-retirement Federer in 2019 did against Novak at Wimbledon (almost beat him) and ATP Finals. The latter is a notoriously fast surface. Just watch highlights of that match vs this one, and it will look eerily similar how aggressive Federer can play and Novak doesn't have answers there.
At this point, Djoko still had room for improvement; Fed was still in the zone, hitting freely and scoring incredibly angled forehand winners out of nowhere
Peak Laver, Nastase, McEnroe (13 titles and an 82-3 record in '84 - still the best in the Open era. Seven doubles titles too in '84 including Wimbledon and the WCT Finals) or peak Sampras? No question though that Federer was sensational in his peak years.
Looking back now, the writing was on the wall all along. Novak really had chances here, and up against possibly the best version of Fed.It's bittersweet to think the era of the of the Big 3 draws to an end. On one hand, fresh blood, but on the other, the greatest Tennis of all time, likely never to be repeated.
23:52 "he may be the greatest player to ever hold a racket" at that time fed was so dominating in grand slams specially that no one would ever think that nadal or djokovic would come close or even surpass him one day. BIG 3 are the GOATs
@@AliAbdullah042I'm a Nadal fan and it's honestly hard to argue with you on that one. Djokovic is the most accomplished at this very moment and still playing at a high level. I'm hoping Nadal comes fresh next year and makes it interesting again.
@@NamTran-xc2ip true but sadly they retired early relative to the big 3 but it's not hard to see that they could have potentially gotten to 20gs if they kept going.
Honestly, I think this is an "experience comes with time" moment. A few more years and Djokovic could resist the pressure of being, say, 4-1 or 6-5 (40-0) at an advantage and go on to take his advantage and win with it. It's not as easy as you might think.
2 huge double faults from Novak at critical moments in the first set Something you would rarely if ever see him do as his career progressed Guy was only 20 years old and was up to world no 3 But Federer He was at the peak of his powers at that time Damn near unbeatable
Federer played amazing in this match…I think this version of Federer was probably his peak. Later in his career he had so many more weaknesses and flaws in his game. Also after losing many close matches to djokovic and Nadal, his mental game took a huge hit. Later on his career you could see Federer struggle mentally and exhibit so many moments of mental frailty. Here, he played cold blooded tennis and gave the middle finger to djokovic whenever djokovic had a moment to gain the upper hand in the match.
He was much faster and had way more power in his twenties. It's like two different players. I don't understand the comparisons. Imagine if the roles are switched and 32 year old Djokovic is playing 26 year old Fed and Nadal like age is not a factor at all. That's why you can debate all day.
@@Romans8-9 You have no idea. Look up the news archives it was reported at the time. Fed said he was ill during the Aus Open but the doctors did not properly diagnose that he had mononucleosis until after the open.
@@oot007 He got it in December 07, he didn´t have it during the tournament, there is no way he would have even made a GS semi final if he had mono during the tournament. He said he felt sluggish at the start of the year, to say he lost to Novak because of mono, is straight up excuse-making.
Sight to behold in his prime bc the competition was weak. From 2011 at 29, he suddenly lost that confidence bc the competition wasn't baby player anymore
@@messithegoat9636 Then the court was not fast enough, or the public chants were not as loud as they should be, and don't forget about Novak and the lucky shots too. There's always an excuse for them when it comes to not recognizing Novak's greatness😂
A few things, while certain elements of Djokovics game has remained the same or improved, its stunning to see how much his served has changed, and its also stunning to see how much of a complete player he has become as compared to here where he is in essence an offensive baseliner. Second, I am glad that they introduced the shot clock for serves, because dang, Novak's 50000 ball bounces before serves is definitely a tactic to waste time. Also, the improvement in how Novak has become such a mental giant, he is impossible to break in the mind now
Fed overtook Sampras around age 20. Djoker couldn't beat Fed until Fed was about 30 and Djoker 25. Then still up 2 match points at age 37. Fed is GOAT.
@@sopidf not really. When either was ranked No.1, the other was No.3. They are not on the other side of the draw, like No.1 and No.2, they are to meet before the finals, usually in the semifinals, which is what happened from 2007-09 + 2011 AO - 2012.
Slowing down started before Federer won his first slam. It actually started in 2000 but balls were lighter which were made heavier since late 2000s. Now if you want real fast court then AO is much faster than before and last year it was ultra fast
It is incredible to that this was Federer 12 grand slam titles and Djokovic had 0 grand slam title at the end of 2007. Now in 2023, Djokovic has 22 grand slam titles to Federer 20 titles. Shows how you can surpassed people. Djokovic even break the record for most weeks at #1
Djokovic was such a kid back then, crazy. He dominated the first and second set, yet was not capable of closing those sets mostly due to his mental weakness back then. Today it's the exact opposite. 2006 and 2007 (08 and 09 weren't bad, but Federer was starting to go down) were the last great years for Federer, after that Nadal and Djokovic were way too strong for him.
2017 was a great year for Federer (the great comeback at Australian Open and winning Wimbledon without losing a set). He dominated Nadal between 2017-2019. 2011 could have been a great year. 2012 had great Federer moments.
This is tennis at its best. if you take a player's maximum strength as a benchmark, roger federer is without a doubt the greatest tennis player of all time.
This is a Achievement to Nole more than Federer... Who has been no.1 for +3 years now and +9-10 grand slam winner... Nole was just a Kid... Who got his revenge AO 5 Months Later
@@Dark_Voice It's a difficult conversation to have, yes Nole started playing like a god from 2011 but a major factor is that hard courts got much slower as well. This massively helped Nole and Rafa's game and hurt Roger's game.
Federer is of previous era. He is 6 years senior to Nadal & Djoker. Lucky for these 2. If Roger & other 2 were of same age, Federer would have definitely won many tournaments & other 2 very less
Nadal and Djoker cannot shine in different eras, as these both are very less talented players. Slowing of courts.,Very very weak next generation players, double handed back hand ( looks so much illegal), giving 25 seconds for service time( should be less than 9 seconds) etc helped them to win many tournaments , where as Federer being very heavily talented, most complete game would have been no: 1 player in any era of tennis past,present, future)
Novak realized that he is a much better defender and hence he adopted the more "boring" approach to his game which actually got him tons of wins. Everyone has their strengths. Playing attacking tennis is not one of them for Djoker. Especially against a Prime federer in 2007 (one of the best attacking players ever) was almost impossible (except Nadal on Clay). Perfect example is Wimbledon 2019 Final which we all can agree that Fed lost it more than Djoker won it. It was more mental than anything which is where Djoker is super strong and only Nadal comes close when it comes to the mental toughness.
@@codegeek-il5fm Yes and no. I think he is definetely a better defender, but he could have never capitalized on that if the courts hadn't gotten slower.
@@parmecy8525always with these ‘fast courts’ bs. Djokovic has beaten federer in Ao 08, when it hasn’t changed to rebound ace. Let’s assume u r right, tennis courts don’t have to suit Federer. Court speed is slowed down due to improvements in racquets technology. Even when Wimbledon slowed down, big servers still have a massive advantage.
It’s great to see Fed in his prime. I’d love to see the tennis community make 3 changes…speed up the courts a bit so offense can be rewarded, get rid of the huge rackets, and eliminate the 2 handed backhand in mens tennis. The sport would be so much better.
Yes completely agree. 2 handed Back hand & taking 25 seconds to serve is Ladies game. Both of these to be abolished in men's game soon. Single handed back hand & Service time less than or equal to 7 seconds. If these had been done long time back, only sampras & Federer would have won many tournaments
@@cosmoplavix1468 Federer plays with one hand , takes very less time to serve ( less than 7 seconds) , never grunts, never shouts , never moans distracting the opponent, never sweats ( high stamina)like other players. The most complete male player ever, next comes a little far behind is pete sampras . All other male players are much much far behind than these 2 . 2 hand usage, shouting, distracting opponent, taking more than 25 seconds to serve, sweating a hell while playing, playing a very defensive game, never aggressive at all in any place etc etc are never treated as men's sports. Also these type of negative games - titles won should be divided by 2 ( just like in cricket last 25 years reduced the boundary line by 40-50% distance , saying I have hit lot of boundaries ,wearing all types of protective gears while playing and their achievements are far behind compared to cricketers played before year1995. They were far superior & greater in all respects)
@@-theislander-5888 Failed !! 2009 he made all slam finals on slow courts and won 2 2010 won AO What about titles at miami and Indian wells What about 2017 when he owned Rafa! Why couldn't Rafa make to a hard court slam final at 2006 , 2007 , 2008 Oh yes Because courts were faster and it didn't suit him.
@@AhmedEmad-hi1ks no because rafa was 22 years old lmaooo. as he got older he adapted, and won many slams on courts he didn’t perform so well on in his early days. federer very much stagnated and failed to dominate the new guys (novak, rafa) like he did his other rivals. federer had enormous succes in a relatively short time period but when you look at continued succes and consistent slam wins he is miles behind the other two.
@@-theislander-5888 Lol Fed reached AO semis from 2011 to 2014 and 2016 won 2017 ,2018 and played 2020 semis but he was post his prime and+30s and at this period won more AOs than Rafa! Spot on that his rivals are younger than him 5 and 6 years so of course he can't dominate like before although he could still win.
this is a reminder that djokovic can choke as well.he had 3 set points on his serve in the 1st set and in the 2nd he had a break advantage.federer's mentality was beyond good in that match.
Any player can choked or get nervous, but in this it's understandable, it was his first gs final against the dominant n1 at the time with 20yrs, Federer choked so much more Even with rivals who werent that dangerous, it's more a problem with his mental Game than just ocational chokes, he Even loosed a 40-15 in Montreal against Djokovic this same year too
Reupload, this time all points are present!
www.patreon.com/peRFecttennis
For those who want to support my channel and enjoy the highlights that cannot be uploaded to YT
(and the full version of those present with cuts)
awesome
Wonderful match, thanks for the reupload! I was wondering, do you have any of these matches: vs Lacko at AO 2011, vs Basilashvili at AO 2016, vs Soderling at WB 2009, vs Beck at USO 2010 or vs Monfils at RG 2015? If you have any of these, I would like to see any of them one day. I don't want to be a wish pig, so if you want to put just one of those that you have on your list, I'm happy! Once again, thank you for all your work and passion!
@@Aaron-fj1hl Many thanks.
@@andreim.5324 You're welcome Andrei! I will try to do possible, currently i have 84 matches on the list... :D
czcams.com/video/R4CBbf5sBNg/video.html
Dark federer + fast courts = unstoppable
Dude Federer is white ethnicity, not black
@@atomics.h.1824 Gordon Ramsay: you donkey
@@kakashihatake1029 lmao
Super Sayan for sure !
@@atomics.h.1824 bro i didnt know that federer wasnt black
man federer had soo much more confidence back then. you forget how hard and clean he hit those shots.
He was also younger and in his prime. Joker was not yet in his prime and when Joker made it to his prime, Fed was winding down, like all great players do.
mononucleosis drastically affected Federer's career.
If you compare his physical attributes (power, speed, etc.) of Wimby 2007 final to Wimby 2008/09 finals, or from USO 2007 final, to USO 2008/09 finals, you can easily notice how much power he had lost in his strokes and isn't moving as fluid or fast as he was during 2007.
@@JamesHarris-hl2bm their matches have been close so age has not been the defining factor.
it’s a different federer!
@@fejuncor I think there was definitely an effect but was it that long lasting? His issues seemed more mental after a certain time.
These two are legend. This is not just a match, it’s an masterpiece performance ❤
it is very very very very awesome
`I find it a more than a little boring when the opponent forces a baseline slugfest on Federer But it's the only final, so people show up and sit through it and cheer.
It's crazy. Including Federers first Grand Slam Win, there have been 74 of the big Tournaments. Just thinking that the Big Three Nadal, Federer and Djokovic won 61 from those 74 is just so unreal. Such a Dominance. Overall there have only been 11 different Winners since Wimbledon 2003. I don't think we will ever see something comparable in Tennis.
Roddick, Murray, Wawrinka, Del Potro, Cilic, Thiem and Medvedev were the only ones to win at least one Grand Slam during the Big 3 era.
Edit: also Gaudio and I don't remember the other 3 Slam winners.
@@brunoborello8309 Safin is the only other person on that list. I don't think there have been "11 different GS winners" since Wimby '03.
@@jakehuang3545 Yeah, numbers dont rly add up. Wawrinka won 3, and Murray won 3 aswell.
Weakest era in tennis from year 2005 to year 2012 ( Federer won many spams) & the Super MOST WEAKEST ERA from year 2013 to year 2025 ( Nadal & Djoker winning almost all slams , both winning 25 slams each. This is the disgrace to this sport & shame. Strongest ERA in tennis - 1975 to 2004, where multiple slam many winners were there
@@devasundarchatpublicityas9472 What you mean is likely most competitive in the sense that it was anyone’s taking for a slam. The other two “weak” eras were simply dominated by the big three.
Fed whipping forhand while moving forward got to be the sexiest shot in tennis
Look at the respect and admiration in Novak's eyes when they come to shake hands at the net.
And lack there of from Federer.
@@fifa3 He thought of him as a puny next gen who would fizzle out just like the rest and he'd remain at the top, and now 8-7,40-15 has happened and djokers made him cry and has won more slams than him lol love to see that arrogant uppity fed put in his place.
@@arwenlostlorn6569 uh... You should see a shrink
@@user-cy6xl3vd3f For not liking Federer? You Federer fans are something lmao. The arrogance you have to believe anyone who dislikes Federer is mentally ill is astounding.
@@arwenlostlorn6569 nope, for being so aggressive and obnoxious.
Federer in his prime is such a sight to behold.
I've been going back and watching these prior matches. This confirms that when Fed was 25 (his prime), Djoker could not beat him. Djoker was there with the skills and speed at 20. Remember that Fed had to beat Sampras at 19-20 age. So why can't Djoker do that?? Why did Djoker had to wait til Fed was about 30 to win? This to me clearly means Fed is GOAT. When skills are that close, the slight edge in age / agility is huge.
@@MrTomNguyen 40-15
@@MrTomNguyen Yes! & even though Nadal & Djoko are the same age, Nadal was consistently challenging & beating prime Federer, but djoko was a puppy in front of prime Federer.
@@peterparker01 not consistently...Nadal won sometimes during those years. But yes, held up better than Djoker.
@@MrTomNguyen Fed missed the opportunity of winning a lot of matches against Rafa at the US Open, I still think overall Novak prime was the best of the 3 , can't decide between Fed and Rafa
Federer hit with such power and confidence in his prime
Almost 15 years later and still these are the guys to beat. Wow 🥺
Fed is not guy to beat since 2019 Wimbledon. He is irrelevant nowdays
@@rishbahpandey8697 Saying the one basically achieving nothing in life and btw Djokoshit is since mid 2021 not relevant anymore so not that much better either lol 🤣🤣🤣
@@xonilatifi7955 Djokovic is World #1, don't be stupid.
@@xonilatifi7955 I am telling truth. Fed is a joke and irrelevant
@@xonilatifi7955 Nadal and Djokovic way better than Federer
Sometimes I think people forget how great Roger's serve was
Was? So it's not great anymore..that's laughable..
People forget how great he was in general. A lot of fans now have only watched him play as an old man.
@@Kidgloves1984 he's not playing ..
Or is he...
Chuckles 😃
Not at the moment, but to insinuate Roger serve was really good and somehow it's not anymore since the last time he played is ridiculous..let's see when Roger comes back one last time..
@@Kidgloves1984
Yeah let him come back and then flee again...
Like he's doing now or he did at rg for so many years..
King fleeer
Look at his foot work,
His balance,
His grace,
His calmness.
Nobody is like the 🏆
FEDERER 🌹
Cut to 2011 - Djokovic was #1 seeded and Federer #3. 4 years apart, but over a decade ago. Their dominance is just wild 🤯
When Fed blew match points v Novak.
@@Romans8-9 do you realise how much you have narrowed this down?
@@MKD1101 Its partly true though . Also as federer started to age he got worse , whereas Novak got better . Which is why Novak always started defeating federer imo.
@@johnmack7013 they have an age difference of 6 years so wouldn't it be better if we compared them at same age?
@@MKD1101 Yeah Probably. Its tough to do that though , because the competition was different.Hard to compare
The way Federer played here was quite different than the past few years. The court or the ball were playing faster it seemed. While Djokovic was already showing some glimpses of his powerful returns.
the courts were faster, most tournaments changed materials and slowed them down quite a bit which favored long rallies and counterpunchers.
Yes the ball played much faster then. They changed the balls around 2010 which make the courts seem to play slower.
2007 is always my favorite version of Fed. Also, this ultra aggressive version of Djokovic is quite weird. He's very aggressive against Nadal every time they play, but nothing like this raw aggression here
he uses his head a lot more these days
mine was 2017... one of the best comeback ever.
I miss aggressive Djokovic "/
@@pietrpiepir6444 He is much stronger and play with his head now, no doubts
Djokovic 2015 & 2021 would expose on tennis court a 20 years old Djokovic
@@mickaellandry9726 current Nole is definitely better then 2007 Nole, but I wish he could somehow be as good as he is now and be aggressive like 2007 Nole.
Its crazy how much someones form can change at the top level. You could tell djokovic had what it takes to win but it was the small things in his form ans serve he was lacking then but has now. He's much more efficient and consistent with all aspects of his game more now than he was when he started the tour. This is coming from a federer fan i don't exactly "suuport" djokovic but you can admire his progression and dedication
Я не думаю, что это на 100% так. Да, что то Джокович усилил, но и тогда в 2007 он тоже дошел до этого финала. Как? Его теннис и тогда был очень неплох. Но.. тогда Федерер был лучше. Я бы сказал так, что тот Роджер, из 2007, уничтожил бы Новака в любом матче, но возраст и медленные корты сделали свое дело.
Yes 2011 djokovc or 2015 djokovic against this version of federer would be very interesting indeed and epic. An all-time dream matchup.
Exactly 2015 Djokovic on this court against Federer. The outcome may have been different. Djokovic was just a baby here.
@@derrickc1353 was a skinny baby - not much muscle.
Lol fed almost beat joker in 2015 uso he just could not convert the heap of BPs he had. Fed was way off his hay years and joker was in his prime still when Fed gets he close to A game, joker starts panting like a bitch. Watch the full match, it will open up your eyes
2007 and Djokovic was already third seed at age 20, a few months away from his first grand slam, he was the "next gen" back then, nowadays I had waited for years for many "nest gen" to step up and they still cant, the tour was stronger and healthier in those days
they are the most disappointing next gen ever, they can't even win a slam beating the old guys
@@kiklocus4660 Those guys are the best in tennis history. What was Jordan doing when he was over 35, now Messi and Ronaldo over 35... Some people r just whole other level
Talent usually skips a generation
@@LucaMatteis yeah but the nishikori and raonic generation was the lost one
Yeah.. this big 3 are too good too smart for anybody... the next generation is nothing special.. not skilled enough to reach these guys' level..
Federer hitting those days was smooth as silk but still massively destroying guys on the other side of the net. Djokovic's aggressiveness is gone today.
Djokovic doesn’t need to hit aggressively nowadays though. With the slowed down surfaces and the young guys being mostly nutcases, he can just play wall and let the other guy self-destruct.
Djokovic's aggressiveness is not gone at all. He has played smarter over the last decade than 2007.
Djokovic doesn't just wait for any unforced errors from his opponents. That's the typical fake narrative spreading by his haters. *Djokovic is an aggressive baseline player.*
He likes to be in control and dictate play. Novak rely on the strength of his groundstrokes to move opponents around the court and aggressively goes for winners from the back of the court. He attacks short balls in the court, and takes the chance at making a few unforced errors in order to hit
That's how he won 20GS, 354 weeks as #1, 35 masters1000 and 7 ending season as #1. 🎾🥇🏆
You can't have 25 victories or more in career against respectively Nadal & Federer without aggressiveness. That's a absurd and salty statement....
@@kakashi1300 Please stop spreading caricatural informations about his tennis style just because you're salty and frustrated with Djokovic's success 🙄
Again with the "Djokovic used to.be so agressive unlike today" cause he improved every aspect of his game compared to this match
As a fan of Djokovic, I think you're right. He changed his style to present more consistency instead of aggressiveness. It doesn't mean that he just hits the ball back and waits for opponent's errors. He becomes the classic counter style player, which is the most effective or dangerous style in tennis nowadays.
Look how Novak smile after every loss In finals. He smile and hug his opponent like if he won. What a great man!!
P.S I’m roger fan .
Even though Novak is emotional and expressive during the match, he always is humble after a loss.
@@gelatinousjoe7979 Most of the times, yes. Alway? Nope, just look at when he lost to Nardi recently.
@@NamTran-xc2ip Yeah, always is a strong word
Federer in black, red and green is unstoppable. Federer here, ATP Finals 06 and Indian Wells 2017 😎
Literally his best tournaments
This fed didn’t play that good
@@Luchon20082010 wrong
Federer in 2009 AO was awesome as well. Only struggled against an in-form Berdych before the final. He had perhaps his best (or 2nd best) performance ever against Delpo for example. It was just that Nadal was running as if mobsters were threatening to kill his family or sth. He was returning pretty much everything. His matches against Roger and even more against Verdasco showcased perhaps the best defense i have ever seen.
@@jay_kulina
I agree prime Nadal is the best defender (speed, mobility, anticipation and furiously strong counters) but based on their whole career, Djokovicis better
I wanted to see more epic rallies, ironically though these guys are so good that they are going to put you away right away. Short points with the highest level of precision, accuracy and power.
Also the courts were way faster then
Watch the 2022 Aus open finals. It had so many epic rallies
The most fearful thing about this federer was he would not miss any chance to attack, all his forehand shots are going for a winner and this guy could produce them all day, no matter how much you defend the ball, the game wouldn't become any slower and you won't have a chance to recover, you would have to create an opening or push him back to win the point, he smashes all the lobs, kill almost all the balls at the net, a god like unpredictable serve.I guess that's why there were only Nadal and Davydenko who beat federer in the entire 2006, Such a monster
Kudos to Novak, his game is so destructive here, he is competing so well, he had his chances in both the sets, I think he wasn't mentally strong back then. I think his 2011 version is the evolved version of this level. Nowadays he doesn't play even close to this level and relies on other player's mistakes, not a bad strategy but less entertaining lol. Anyways brilliant match.
Don't forget Murray also beat Federer in 2006, at Cincinnati.
Roger, you've been the most talented tennis player I've ever seen in my life. No Borg no Mcenroe no Sampras no Nadal no Djokovic: you've been the greatest. Thanks for everything you've done on the tennis courts. You've been the class & the elegance made man.
Condivido ogni singola parola Matteo.
He's been, but may be not now
@@jinmanzur4749 we're talking talent and tennis level, not just results
@delriver77 The only objective factor is the results. Otherwise, everyone says whatever he wants...
@@sfhnnx3 no, not really. Results don't tell the whole story. The H2H is a good example, Djokovic leads Fed but most of their matches (+60%) were played during or after Novak's prime (he also avoids Roger in 2017 but Roger didn't avoid Novak in 2013). And courts slowing down has also been a huge factor in Djokovic and Nadal's dominance for at least 7-8 years (2008-2016).
I don't think either of them are better players than Federer (and honestly most people agree that the Swiss has the better technique out of all three), but the game became a lot more physical for several years leading to endless grinding favoring both successors. And I say this as a Nadal fan. Btw, I don't like Djokovic as a symbol, the guy is a douche, but if I actually believed he was more gifted than Roger I wouldn't have a problem admitting to it.
Back then when Novak proactively go to the net. How much these two transformed their gameplay over the last 15 years was astonishing!
Novak didn't realize he had a bigger chance beating Roger from the baseline back then.
@@wilsonchen910 His baseline game didn't mature until 2011, while he abandoned this attacking style from 2008 onward.
@@nihleigleca6702*2010
This match is the reason why Djokovic has beaten Federer many times in slams. He missed many opportunities in this match and learned from it. The same leads that Djokovic blew in this match, Federer would blow for many matches afterwards.
Federer was physically in peak form then and his muscle power probably at his own peak too. Believe it or not that decreases a lot past 30 with age in elite sports especially with Federer's power, aggressive and pin-pointed accuracy based game. Of course Djokovic improved by leaps and bounds too. On grass again Federer could get him, 2012 with whatever power he had left since grass is technically a faster surface. But then it was one-sided in slams from then on until 2019 (Federer lost but it was closer than any match). That was because Federer changed his racquet, and style and tactics. I know and believe that as beautiful as it looks, Federer's single-handed backhander is his Achilles heel. Most players learnt and exploited it a lot.
What lead? He lost 3 sets to 0??
@@sagniksingha yes he is not in prime, but the level was close and he has wayy more experience. He played well enough to get to matchpoints. If anytrhing, age should be an advantage at crucial points since you have more experience.
But Fed hasnt learnt his lessons, while Djokovic did here. Fed lost 24 matches having mps, compared to Djoko 3.
Djok losing that first set up 40-0 on his serve was on his mind in the 2019 Wimbledon final I bet a million bucks.
Novak is such a gracious player, with great sportsmanship as well.
Smashing rakets
Compare that to Nadal's..........hell and HEAVEN difference, DJOKOVIC is the latter !!
Absolutely no doubt about it. Federer remains my favourite player, but I would rate Novak's post-match sportsmanship over that of everybody else, including the Swiss.
It was a great final. I remember the RF "black knight" of the 2007 US Open following the "white knight" at Wimbledon. And Djokovic was already a very strong up and coming player who was starting to threaten RF.
It's crazy how at 2:03 whenever you saw prime Federer get fed a shot like that to his forehand, you basically just knew the point was over. His forehand was of another world. I also can't believe how much Djokovic choked in this match. He could have won this. He was up 6-5, 40-0 on his serve in the first set, choked, got broken, and lost in the tiebreak. In the 2nd set he was up 4-1, and lost that set in a tiebreak as well. The 3rd set he just lost clean, but this match could have easily had Djokovic up 2 sets to 0.
This definitely looks very different from Djokovic today. He didn’t have that unshakable confidence and clutch yet I guess.
Not many can be clutch in in their first slam final at the age of 20.
2:00 has to be my favorite one-two punch of whipping forehands.
I can think that after playing his first final in a Grand Slam and losing it to the one who was the best player of the moment, Nole could only think that one day he would try to win as much as he did and be considered a tennis legend.
Gee, when you watch the level these guys play at, it's insane. We will miss those days!
He was a completely different player! Why did he somehow change his technique and play much more reservedly?
Just passing through on my journey to watch every Federer match.
One match is like 3 hours long lol…
@@allanyang21 If there's highlights I watch the highlights otherwise I watch the full match.
RF didn't know what would happen during the next 13 years.
Young Djokovic was actually a really nice, down to earth, likeable guy. No cockiness, no gesticulating towards the crowd.
Federer fans can deny all they want but djokovic has improved a lot since then. There is much less opportunity to attack his shots these days and his decision making is miles better.
Lol djokovic fans can deny all u want. Peakest of the peak of prime djokovic lost to grandpa fed in 2011 french open. If they meet at their respective peaks.. U know hu wins.. Lol!
@@drnirmalraj2456 prime federer also lost to kuerten in the french open. So kuerten is better?😂😂😂
Miss the wide open Arthur Ashe Stadium, despite the roof being better in case of bad weather. The acoustics and echoing of the shots along with the umpire calls across the massive stadium were majestic back then!
This match shows how athleticism and power (and a good return) just don't cut it against a player who just masters every aspect of the game of tennis. Not even counting this match, Head to Head stats counted fairly, namely in the years where they were both in their prime, 2008-2012
Djokovic: 11
Federer: 12
Djokovic prime 2011 to 2020. Djokovic was practically a teen when he lost to fed.
Djokovic prime 2011-2016
No, it's just a result of court speed. Courts have become so homogenous now that people forget how much difference that used to make and how much of a different game you needed to win on grass vs clay. Novak simply couldn't play the way he plays now due to how fast the courts were. This hurt Federer as time went on and helped Nadal and Novak. For example, no way Nadal wins a single Wimbledon if courts were kept as fast as they were in the 90s. Novak maybe not either.
For further evidence of court speed making a difference, look at how an old near-retirement Federer in 2019 did against Novak at Wimbledon (almost beat him) and ATP Finals. The latter is a notoriously fast surface. Just watch highlights of that match vs this one, and it will look eerily similar how aggressive Federer can play and Novak doesn't have answers there.
Thời điểm này Federer quá hay. Hào hoa và lịch lãm
At this point, Djoko still had room for improvement; Fed was still in the zone, hitting freely and scoring incredibly angled forehand winners out of nowhere
19 years djoko is already insane lol
What an artist ... I mean its not tennis its art ... the greatest tennis player of all time ... at his prime no one was or will ever be greater
Peak Laver, Nastase, McEnroe (13 titles and an 82-3 record in '84 - still the best in the Open era. Seven doubles titles too in '84 including Wimbledon and the WCT Finals) or peak Sampras? No question though that Federer was sensational in his peak years.
The greatest athletes make it look so easy.
Looking back now, the writing was on the wall all along. Novak really had chances here, and up against possibly the best version of Fed.It's bittersweet to think the era of the of the Big 3 draws to an end. On one hand, fresh blood, but on the other, the greatest Tennis of all time, likely never to be repeated.
23:52 "he may be the greatest player to ever hold a racket" at that time fed was so dominating in grand slams specially that no one would ever think that nadal or djokovic would come close or even surpass him one day. BIG 3 are the GOATs
Today, the greatest ever to hold a racket is Novak, no doubts around it.
@@AliAbdullah042I'm a Nadal fan and it's honestly hard to argue with you on that one. Djokovic is the most accomplished at this very moment and still playing at a high level. I'm hoping Nadal comes fresh next year and makes it interesting again.
@@frankhtlllful All 3 of them, Sampras, Borg all have a solid case.
@@NamTran-xc2ip true but sadly they retired early relative to the big 3 but it's not hard to see that they could have potentially gotten to 20gs if they kept going.
This is the best Federer ever
Insane Federer forehand speed. Compared it to some videos of the last years: Wow!
Honestly, I think this is an "experience comes with time" moment. A few more years and Djokovic could resist the pressure of being, say, 4-1 or 6-5 (40-0) at an advantage and go on to take his advantage and win with it. It's not as easy as you might think.
2 huge double faults from Novak at critical moments in the first set
Something you would rarely if ever see him do as his career progressed Guy was only 20 years old and was up to world no 3
But Federer
He was at the peak of his powers at that time
Damn near unbeatable
Fed was prime and fast. Djoker cannot beat Fed at his top. Period.
@@MrTomNguyen ' hahaha...
@@MrTomNguyen so true! They even slow down the court surface to slow down federer cause he was winning too much slam
Federer played amazing in this match…I think this version of Federer was probably his peak. Later in his career he had so many more weaknesses and flaws in his game. Also after losing many close matches to djokovic and Nadal, his mental game took a huge hit. Later on his career you could see Federer struggle mentally and exhibit so many moments of mental frailty. Here, he played cold blooded tennis and gave the middle finger to djokovic whenever djokovic had a moment to gain the upper hand in the match.
Federer peaked in 2006.
He was much faster and had way more power in his twenties. It's like two different players. I don't understand the comparisons. Imagine if the roles are switched and 32 year old Djokovic is playing 26 year old Fed and Nadal like age is not a factor at all. That's why you can debate all day.
I think so too. No tennis great after Djokovic and Nadal, will have to wait till they retire. But Fed had to face them in their prime.
Thou I am fan of Novak I always have great respect to Federer because of his killing service no one can match him❤️🙏
Insane how much Djokovic improved. Especially during 2014~015. Just unbelievable!
Well it was sooner than that. He straight setted Fed at AO 2008.
@@Romans8-9 Fed had glandular fever during that match. A serious illness that forced early retirement to top 10 players like Soderling and Ancic.
@@oot007 Haha. If he had glandular fever he wouldn´t have been able to play the tournament.
@@Romans8-9 You have no idea. Look up the news archives it was reported at the time. Fed said he was ill during the Aus Open but the doctors did not properly diagnose that he had mononucleosis until after the open.
@@oot007 He got it in December 07, he didn´t have it during the tournament, there is no way he would have even made a GS semi final if he had mono during the tournament. He said he felt sluggish at the start of the year, to say he lost to Novak because of mono, is straight up excuse-making.
beautiful shot
All black Federer was all business. The coolest kit colour combo. Reminds me of Mike Tyson in his prime.
Gran partido que nivel de tenis.
Federer hit with such power and confidence in his prime. Federer in his prime is such a sight to behold..
Sight to behold in his prime bc the competition was weak. From 2011 at 29, he suddenly lost that confidence bc the competition wasn't baby player anymore
Watching this made me support Novak even more🥰🥰
Great match
Federer had reached his peak
Djokovic though was just starting
Back then I think Djokovic is not yet mentally strong. Moving forward in 2019 Wimbledon, he won all 3 tie breaks. Incredible!
against a 40 year old congratz
@@mikeg905 what about 2014 and 2015 final lol 😂
@@messithegoat9636 Federer was 34 and 35 years old, Novak was in his Late 20s aka peak lol
@@Spike31773 Then what about 2007 AO semi 2010 USO semi 2011AO semi 2011 USO semi 2012 RG semi..😂🤣🤣
@@messithegoat9636 Then the court was not fast enough, or the public chants were not as loud as they should be, and don't forget about Novak and the lucky shots too. There's always an excuse for them when it comes to not recognizing Novak's greatness😂
A few things, while certain elements of Djokovics game has remained the same or improved, its stunning to see how much his served has changed, and its also stunning to see how much of a complete player he has become as compared to here where he is in essence an offensive baseliner. Second, I am glad that they introduced the shot clock for serves, because dang, Novak's 50000 ball bounces before serves is definitely a tactic to waste time. Also, the improvement in how Novak has become such a mental giant, he is impossible to break in the mind now
Fed overtook Sampras around age 20. Djoker couldn't beat Fed until Fed was about 30 and Djoker 25. Then still up 2 match points at age 37. Fed is GOAT.
@@MrTomNguyen Fed wasnt better than peak Sampras untill 2005 lol.
@@MrTomNguyen Lolthe 2 match points argument is not relevant in this way
@@MrTomNguyen You're flexing a victory in a tourney he didn't even win against a guy who left the tour the following year 😂🤡
It's mind boggling how this ended up being the only time Federer beat Djokovic in a grand slam final
why? this pair didnt meet in a slam final until 2014 WB when fed was almost 33 years old.
@@cloak9001 it's mindboggling they didn't meet again in a final until 2014 WB
@@sopidf not really. When either was ranked No.1, the other was No.3. They are not on the other side of the draw, like No.1 and No.2, they are to meet before the finals, usually in the semifinals, which is what happened from 2007-09 + 2011 AO - 2012.
@@cloak9001 From 2008-2011 they drew each other in the semifinal every possible times except at RG. The draws were fixed.
My wish for 2022 is to see RF playing again!!
And, he won the AUS open 2022 just a few days back.
That was Nadal you fuckhead
@@primerspecial I think you are thinking of Nadal, RF is Roger Federer.
@@thebasketballfan6248 Oh yes. I thought RF - Rafa. I too wish to see Federer play again and win. I don't want to see him like last year.
@@primerspecial Would be a perfect way for him to go out if he won any title, unfortunately I'm not sure if it can happen.
They destroyed one of the greatest domination path of all time by slowing down the surface , Federer would've defo won 2 more after 2010
Mohamed - If you say so?
Would have, could have, should have...
Lost 3 finals to Djokovic at Wimbledon.
Slowing down started before Federer won his first slam. It actually started in 2000 but balls were lighter which were made heavier since late 2000s. Now if you want real fast court then AO is much faster than before and last year it was ultra fast
Real tennis fans know this. Djokovic and Nadal leagues behind fed without massively slowed down surfaces (all)
Excelente ideia, peRFect... Com as siglas do Roger Federer. Super inteligente.
엄청난 경기였내요.
And now Djokovic is about to pass Federer's grand slam total after Sunday's Wimbledon final.
Weak era chump,won all the titles 2010 afterwards when Nadal and Federer started to struggle with injuries,Federer has the career titles 103
Definitivamente éste tipo es de otro planeta
Djokovic? si
Prime Federer, he was something very special...
Especially against weak players like Roddick
@@user-mf5ue6rc5n Don't be disrespectful.
El mejor partido 👐
Could not see the ball on the overhead at 2:35 but the sound was quite beautiful
Crazy how much Novak improved in the 4 months after this
Drugs.
@@soulripper31 xD clown
He didnt improve that much tbh.
@@inviatrroxdx6118 he is against drugs, remember ?
Interesting, your upload is much higher quality than the full match on the official US Open channel lol. Thanks for sharing.
You're welcome! 😎
It is incredible to that this was Federer 12 grand slam titles and Djokovic had 0 grand slam title at the end of 2007. Now in 2023, Djokovic has 22 grand slam titles to Federer 20 titles. Shows how you can surpassed people. Djokovic even break the record for most weeks at #1
Consider all the dynamics how the tennis has changed. How tough the Era has been since 2015. Then conclude
23 now.
He already owned the records at the time you made this comment.
Djokovic was such a kid back then, crazy. He dominated the first and second set, yet was not capable of closing those sets mostly due to his mental weakness back then. Today it's the exact opposite. 2006 and 2007 (08 and 09 weren't bad, but Federer was starting to go down) were the last great years for Federer, after that Nadal and Djokovic were way too strong for him.
2017 was a great year for Federer (the great comeback at Australian Open and winning Wimbledon without losing a set). He dominated Nadal between 2017-2019. 2011 could have been a great year. 2012 had great Federer moments.
@@bolder2009 Fed dominated Rafa in 2017 only. They didn't play in 2018 and in 2019 it was 1-1.
@@ashleythomas4112 That's why I said "...between 2017-2019"
@@bolder2009 That sort of implies that Fed dominated the three years, as in he was dominant in 2017, 18 and 19, which is not true, just 2017 really.
This is tennis at its best. if you take a player's maximum strength as a benchmark, roger federer is without a doubt the greatest tennis player of all time.
To me it's between him and Rafa at their very peak, then very close after Wawrrinka and Nole
Thats debatable.
Great game of tennis. Next level. Classic Federer.
Man that serve had some smoke on it
This was when Federer was the best tennis player we have ever seen up to this day! Full stop!
Quite Possibly - although prime Laver was a hell of a player too.
@@martydav9475 Prime Laver would get 6-1 or 6-2 against any of the big 3, tennis has changed too much in term of sportivity
Que bien jugaba ya Nole a los 20 años, Federer sin palabras. Que linda época, no la disfruté lo suficiente 🥺🥺🥺
This is a Achievement to Nole more than Federer...
Who has been no.1 for +3 years now and +9-10 grand slam winner...
Nole was just a Kid... Who got his revenge AO 5 Months Later
I loved when Novak played that agressively.
Great Great Great match of Federer!
Really the Best!!
He is Magic Federer!!!
✨👍😎👌✨
God...The Maestro was so fast...
Who's here because of sad new yesterday? it's sad for the fans, but no one stays in the courts forever. We will missed you RF, thanks for everything
1:32 terrible ese revés a una sola mano tan característico de Roger...Bravo!
Prime time Roger plays like an absolute god.
2011 Nole would destroy this Roger.
@@Dark_Voice It's a difficult conversation to have, yes Nole started playing like a god from 2011 but a major factor is that hard courts got much slower as well. This massively helped Nole and Rafa's game and hurt Roger's game.
@@Dark_Voice In 2011 Fed beat prime Djokovic though lmao
@@hiteshsharma1132 if Hardcourts got much slower how come Novak only won 3 U.S Opens?
@@Dark_Voice Think the opposite, but this match would be grandiose !
Federer with that destructive forehand!
I remember Federer Prime years 2003-2009
Imagine the Big 3 were grown up in different periods. They would have literally won everything.
A big part of why then won what they won is each other. If not for the other two each would have collected about 15 majors and retired at about 32
Federer is of previous era. He is 6 years senior to Nadal & Djoker. Lucky for these 2. If Roger & other 2 were of same age, Federer would have definitely won many tournaments & other 2 very less
Nadal and Djoker cannot shine in different eras, as these both are very less talented players. Slowing of courts.,Very very weak next generation players, double handed back hand ( looks so much illegal), giving 25 seconds for service time( should be less than 9 seconds) etc helped them to win many tournaments , where as Federer being very heavily talented, most complete game would have been no: 1 player in any era of tennis past,present, future)
@@mahalakshmid8613 That's a funny salty comment mate 😂
Two-handed backhand illegal lmao 🤣🤣
@@devasundarchatpublicityas9472I would say Federer is lucky to have a head start, if they are the same age, Federer would win way less
Odd to see Novak being so aggressive here. Way different than today's version.
I prefer this and 2011 version of the Joker as a Fed fan. He was very entertaining.
Novak realized that he is a much better defender and hence he adopted the more "boring" approach to his game which actually got him tons of wins. Everyone has their strengths. Playing attacking tennis is not one of them for Djoker. Especially against a Prime federer in 2007 (one of the best attacking players ever) was almost impossible (except Nadal on Clay). Perfect example is Wimbledon 2019 Final which we all can agree that Fed lost it more than Djoker won it. It was more mental than anything which is where Djoker is super strong and only Nadal comes close when it comes to the mental toughness.
@@codegeek-il5fm Yes and no. I think he is definetely a better defender, but he could have never capitalized on that if the courts hadn't gotten slower.
@@parmecy8525always with these ‘fast courts’ bs. Djokovic has beaten federer in Ao 08, when it hasn’t changed to rebound ace.
Let’s assume u r right, tennis courts don’t have to suit Federer. Court speed is slowed down due to improvements in racquets technology.
Even when Wimbledon slowed down, big servers still have a massive advantage.
Federer quá tuyệt vời vỉ đại
This early version of Fed is so aggressive; every short ball and he is rushing the net.
It’s great to see Fed in his prime. I’d love to see the tennis community make 3 changes…speed up the courts a bit so offense can be rewarded, get rid of the huge rackets, and eliminate the 2 handed backhand in mens tennis. The sport would be so much better.
For sure on speeding up the courts. Funner tennis
Yes completely agree. 2 handed Back hand & taking 25 seconds to serve is Ladies game. Both of these to be abolished in men's game soon. Single handed back hand & Service time less than or equal to 7 seconds. If these had been done long time back, only sampras & Federer would have won many tournaments
@@devasundarchatpublicityas9472 cool 2nd account dummy 😂
@@devasundarchatpublicityas9472 federer got owned by a ladies game strategy hahaha 💀
@@cosmoplavix1468 Federer plays with one hand , takes very less time to serve ( less than 7 seconds) , never grunts, never shouts , never moans distracting the opponent, never sweats ( high stamina)like other players. The most complete male player ever, next comes a little far behind is pete sampras . All other male players are much much far behind than these 2 . 2 hand usage, shouting, distracting opponent, taking more than 25 seconds to serve, sweating a hell while playing, playing a very defensive game, never aggressive at all in any place etc etc are never treated as men's sports. Also these type of negative games - titles won should be divided by 2 ( just like in cricket last 25 years reduced the boundary line by 40-50% distance , saying I have hit lot of boundaries ,wearing all types of protective gears while playing and their achievements are far behind compared to cricketers played before year1995. They were far superior & greater in all respects)
If they kept fast courts one more year the score would've been like 22 slams for federer .
if ... if ... if ... yawn ........
federer too stubborn to adapt.
champions adapt, he obviously failed to do it.
if,if,if doesn’t exist in this sport.
@@-theislander-5888
Failed !!
2009 he made all slam finals on slow courts and won 2
2010 won AO
What about titles at miami and Indian wells
What about 2017 when he owned Rafa!
Why couldn't Rafa make to a hard court slam final at 2006 , 2007 , 2008
Oh yes Because courts were faster and it didn't suit him.
@@AhmedEmad-hi1ks no because rafa was 22 years old lmaooo.
as he got older he adapted, and won many slams on courts he didn’t perform so well on in his early days.
federer very much stagnated and failed to dominate the new guys (novak, rafa) like he did his other rivals.
federer had enormous succes in a relatively short time period but when you look at continued succes and consistent slam wins he is miles behind the other two.
@@-theislander-5888
Lol Fed reached AO semis from 2011 to 2014 and 2016 won 2017 ,2018 and played 2020 semis but he was post his prime and+30s and at this period won more AOs than Rafa!
Spot on that his rivals are younger than him 5 and 6 years so of course he can't dominate like before although he could still win.
Surprised they didnt pop string . Man tha ball is flying...🎾🔥🔥
Quel match ! Les coups droits de Federer sont juste dévastateurs 😮
Djokovic beat Fed a couple months later in AO.
this is a reminder that djokovic can choke as well.he had 3 set points on his serve in the 1st set and in the 2nd he had a break advantage.federer's mentality was beyond good in that match.
As a teenager 15 years ago. This is a reminder that Djokovic is the best who ever played this game.
@@rodrigomarquez6990 Nice try but not what the slam count says.
Djokovic's first slam ,lack of experience.
@@tc5111 For the GOAT debate you don't count only GS.
Any player can choked or get nervous, but in this it's understandable, it was his first gs final against the dominant n1 at the time with 20yrs, Federer choked so much more Even with rivals who werent that dangerous, it's more a problem with his mental Game than just ocational chokes, he Even loosed a 40-15 in Montreal against Djokovic this same year too