What is Repression? (Part II) Introduction to Lacan's Theory
Vložit
- čas přidán 23. 12. 2019
- Part II of a short series of videos introducing the concept of repression in psychoanalysis, looking at one of Freud's most famous cases, and Jacques Lacan's take on it.
Contact me for psychoanalytic psychotherapy - www.lacanonline.com/appointme...
For more exploring psychoanalysis through the work of Jacques Lacan - www.LacanOnline.com
Yet again another wonderfully explained video! Great content!
This is brilliant. In the sea of popular nonsense I thought all psychoanalysis was utter bs but now I'm gonna actually try and read Lacan.
you have no idea how much we appreciate these videos of yours. please keep it up
I wish yall made more content! How am I supposed to get through all the Seminars without you?
Writing an essay on psychoanalysis for my Film Studies degree, thank you so much for this video, it's given me lots of inspiration! As a visual learner the use of images is especially great.
Simply beautiful elucidation. I’ve been reading Freud and Lacan for some years, and, a thousand glazes on this case later, I can say I have found the definitive brief take.
I'm really thankful for your videos, I've been studying Lacan since 6 years ago but this video really clears my mind.
Thank you so much for these videos and your website.
This is some quality content, keep it up!
You produce excellent material. Keep it up and Merry Christmas!
Thank you. This is very clear and helpful.
Lacanian Christmas gift
It was repressed until the facilitating idea.
Great video. The surrounding narrative really works well to bring the juice out of the concepts. And the critique of old myths surrounding Freud and psychoanalysis really does justice to Lacan's message. I would only add as a way of positive feedback that sometimes it is hard to both listen to your voice and read the long quotes. These should stay a bit longer on the screen. Thank you
amazing material! Easy to follow but nonetheless transmits the complexity very well
Great videos. Reading sublime object and being a mathematician, I conceptualized Lacan almost purely topologically.
This videos are great, thank you very much!
I call it my mind map but now we term the nodal points! 8:09
If you can create a personal mind map of triggers both dormant and active, you can research what topics can help you to unlock your mind and thoughts…possibly 😅✌️❤️
Thanks for the lecture 👍
This deserves a second listen; it's classic and real.
Approx 7 years ago a Lucid dream revealed a Rat walking into a blazing fireplace; Lacan states the importance of Signifiers. My association was that the rat was deserving of its demise; I had no way of knowing that this dream represented a major turning point in my analysis or that it indicated so much of my personal complexes. I was far from understanding the dynamics of my life, then.
I did view the dream as important, and positive.
I could not have understood my unconscious life without access to what Jung calls the Collective Unconscious.
5:18 Yeah, I can see how those sorts of demands may have effects over time.
When is part 3 up?
5:24 underlying factors can be triggered unconsciously which is why mind altering medication 💊 should be taken very seriously!
Goat
I have a hard time grasping what studying Lacan could yield in results in the clinic. It's too much hardship and years and I can't see the points clearly, like other authors (Winnicot, Klein, Bion, Ferenczi etc).
Could someone give me a list on what would I, as a professional, get? What could I actually learn? I dont tend to enjoy my lacanian coleagues at all. I need a clear bulletpoint on this.
where is part 3
In production! Subscribe and hit the bell icon to be notified when it's live.
Hi I need the text of this video
6:30
Rathaus
Ghosts Ibsen
RBF Uncovered! 😂
In your article on your website you make NO MENTION of the ratman being afraid people he cares about will be tortured and it seems like he is just unnerved by the torture method.
Freud, SE X, p.167
Repression, rePRESSion, Press the ions, press the Like icon...
Starting in 1975, Jacques Lacan clearly recognized, on several occasions, the aporias of psychoanalysis.
In 1977, on ethics:
"Our practice is a swindle, bluffing, making people stick, dazzling them with words that are shocked, [...] From an ethical point of view, it's untenable."
In 1978, on scientificity:
"Psychoanalysis is not a science. ...it is a delusion - a delusion that is expected to carry a science."
In 1979, on the conditioning of the analyzed:
"It is not a science at all because it is irrefutable. The psychoanalyst is a rhetorician. ...operates only by suggestion. He suggests, that's the characteristic of a rhetorician, he doesn't impose anything of substance."
On 5-1-1980, Lacan declared in his 'Letter of Dissolution':
"I have failed - that is to say, I have become confused. ...] Freud allowed the psychoanalytical group to prevail over discourse, to become Church."
His followers continue to try to understand his SIBYLLINAR TEXTS by avoiding taking seriously the last cities, however clear they may be.
Its about the essential of the “sujet supposé savoir“
Yo dog, where's part III?
In production :) Subscribe and hit the bell icon to be notified when it's ready
Me like rat