Why Europe Doesn't Build Skyscrapers
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 11. 2020
- Support CuriousReason:
✔Patreon: / curiousreason
✔CZcams Membership: https: bit.ly/2Qt5Gna
Why The US Still Has No High-Speed Rail - • How California Failed ...
North America, Asia, the Middle East... all have constructed forests of skyscrapers. In this video, we will talk about why Europe doesn't like skyscrapers. Why Europe doesn't build skyscrapers. Why There are no skyscrapers in Europe.
Special Thanks to Patreon Supporters:
Sannu
Lets chat:
✔Twitter: / reasoncurious
✔Facebook: / curiousreason1
✔Subreddit: / curious_reason
✔Instagram: / curious_reason
Business inquiries: thecuriousreason@gmail.com - Věda a technologie
The answer: to keep their history seen
Thank u..
Thanks
Thanks
Thanks
Yeah they destroyed history of others and want to preserve theirs
I'm italian and my house was built in 1300, before the discovery of America
Grande fra diglielo a sti ignoranti del cazzo che dicono che i grattacieli sono meglio delle cattedrali. C'è ma pensa tu come sarebbero città come Bologna o Firenze con quei cazzo di grattacieli. Dai almen son felice di vedere un italiano stammi bene fratè.
Now this comment is underrated.
I'm brazilian,and the building where I live was built after milan last champions league trophy lol
@@netosdopt9907 Year?
Lol
When I was a kid, I was in awe looking at skyscrapers.
When I am an adult, I love to see historical buildings especially buildings that have art deco, baroque, or roccoco architecture.
Was in awe of both and still
I see a clear difference in architecture. Olden and historical architecture is far better. Has much more detail different patterns and elegance. Modern build are more flat and blend. If it's not blend modern architecture they come up with weird shapes and often loads of glass. When they ran out of ideas. They paint the flat wall. Where as in old budlings you see different colours because of the different material they used.
But I admit as a child if I saw a really tall budling. I would be like wow thats tall must be important. But if you have loads of them makes it that much less impressive.
I'm not European, but I think one of the most beautiful things of this continent are its ancient cities full of history and nature, those cathedrals, castles, palaces, ancient houses, tight streets and the most beautiful arquitectures in the world... please, don't destroy that :c
Im from europe and say; go to Rome or Paris.
Just search on google: trevi fountain rome video. Lets imagine you build a skyscraper there. Nuts
I wanna visit Europe, can u tell me which is the most historic country in EUROPE.
@@owaismohammedejazahmed6710 i think its italy. You have there Venice, Rome and vatican city. All amazing especially Rome , it is the most historic city by far. When you like castles go britain and scotland.
@@fixxa6455 thanks bro.
City planner: You see that Cathedral?
Architect: Yes sir.
City planner: I want to keep seeing it.
Lmfao
Hahaha
Exactly what may Italian friend told me! He said he loved to see one cathedral since childhood and so does his father 😅
Hey do you see that 30-40m tall historical warehouse? Yeah I want it to be viewable from everywhere.
I cracked ... 😁😁😁
Europe capitals has 3000 years or more of history underground.
You just can't dig anywhere and not found an archeology site.
That's it. Each time they dig in my town, they find a damn Roman building or something and construction has to stop until archeological value of the ruins are calculated. XD
Yes. And due to corruption, they destroy archeological architecture anyways...
or they find an unexploded bomb from ww2. Ouch!
@@Dalkil Yeah, that happened when my family was building a new house and we dug up a Roman fireplace and now that is integrated as part of my father's shop. We had both labourers and archaeologists at our construction zone XD
Same a stupid t rex was found in my basement #richishard #blessed
Im from Spain and we dont need skyscrapers, our cities are very beautiful without them
Skyscrapers look like shit . We don t need them in Europe
True, skyscrapper kinda eye sore 🤦
Spain is a beautiful country, doesn't have souless concrete jungles of the UK along with over population and air pollution.
Que fregón como decimos en México👍
@@rp7159 thanks man
Europe without skyscrapers forever, hopefully. Our Europe is so pretty. ❤️
Ew
@@yallheartheteaisboiling9989 Amerimutt detected.
@@yallheartheteaisboiling9989 Hi, trailer trash, how is the world's highest debt over there?
@@SokkingBTtulaj I’m not American, but America is way better it’s a super power
@@yallheartheteaisboiling9989 Bruh, America is literally collapsing as we speak. I give it 10 years at most before it either collapses or becomes a third world nation.
Im living in a modern village in Europe in a house built in 2000, and travelled to Paris and Berlin. And the cities are really beautiful and should not be ruined by skyscrapers
@@billcipher9265 Building modern skyscrapers in a city like florence doesn't seem like a good aesthetic choice. It just doesn't fit..
I live in 28th floor lol
Life quality over a nice view i would say. Also, yall never consider that some of those historic buildings demand loads of money to restore and that money comes from tax payers. People > old buildings
@@mistercreeper674 Imagine Florence, Italy with a bunch of Skyscrapers like Chicago or New York. Oh my gosh
@@erikasl.7050 you get great life quality in historical buildings , all the rich people in Paris want them. As for the fees, they are paied by their private owners and they are not more expensive than let's say buildings from the 60's or 80's because the construction was crap. I would'nt buy in the new buildings , I know construction workers who tell me that the entreprenors are so obssessed by cost containement that they don't give the concrete enough time to dry up, ten years after building the problems start , everything falls down : plummery, concrete, water infiltration-and it's expensive. Historical monuments costs(no inhabited) are paied by taxes , but also the huge amount of tourism that they bring. Those taxes are a great investement for our economies. I still think we should build o nthe outskirts because it cannot be worse than what it allready is.
*I'm going to sleep
YT: why Europe doesn't build skyscrapers
*well that's a good question
Same here
this is stupid... Europe builds skyscrapers too, the thing is that European cities are OLD, they predate the tech necessary to build sky scrapers...while middle east and eastern cities tore down their city center ( where the skyscrapers tend to be built ) so ...
Warsaw has plenty of space for skyscrapers.
@@JoaoMariaNunes no, many Europeans hate scysxrapers ans they are banned. Even in areas where all buildings could be torn down. After all chinese cities atmre also old. And New York was also old., as well as easterj amerucan states, they are from. 17th century.
Because of you ed calauag😂😂😂😂
I live in Paris and I’d rather pay shit loads of rent than see a different Paris with skyscrapers
Imagine going to paris and seening NY or something like that fuck 🤣
@@Mrdinomist LMAOOOOOOO
@Coen Lammerts i know and it isn t ugly city per say but compared to Paris , Munich, Berlin, Rome( basicly any italian big city) , Vienna etc it isn’t anything special.
With addition of skyscrapers almost every big city would look as uninspiring as ones like NY
@@Mrdinomist honestly NYC is amazing and one of the most beautiful cities I’ve been to
Fun fact:
The european city in the thumbnail is Bologna, in Italy. And in medieval times it was famous for the large number of towers built by many noble families (around 100). Now about 20 of them are left, the highest being "Torre degli Asinelli" (97 m) (Torre di Pisa is 57 m in comparison).
And talking about skyscrapers it fits very well.
however, not really. because they were beautiful and not modern ugly things. Pretty towers and spires are nice . those are not skyscrapers.
Dude, in the village i live in if the people would ever hear that anyone wants to cut the trees to build huge blocks of concrete they will be enraged af. We care so much about the trees and green lands , it makes it feel like home to have woods around you
Elon Musk: I'm gonna build the new factory Giga Berlin in Germany
Environmentalist: I'm about to end this man's whole career...
If your village grew to a population of 1 million because of economic activity, I don’t think many would care about the local trees.
Many City dwellers can afford to visit a forest if they so choose.
@@thomasreedy4751 f economy, yes to fresh air and greenery :P lol
I think you all might be exaggerating a bit. As personally I live in Chicago and there are plenty of parks to go to and huge ones if you travel a bit
Yall got my idea wrong =)))) first off thr economy of my village is based especially on tourism because people likes the green stuff and mountains and fresh air, so i dont say fuck m economy because the fucking trees are a part of my economy so their presence stops me from starving =))) Secondly , i think humans like to build more than they need. I dont mean to say i am eco friendly because if there is such a ting as climate change and poluation i am 100% sure my country is not the one to have fingers pointed on so i dont give a shit about it , 'muricans and asia can deal with it. I was just saying that it just feels like someone is taking a part of your home away from you
In the Netherlands, only a few major and popular cities have skyscrapers. I live in a really old city. We even have parts of our walls, from the 14th century, that are still standing. It’s a very unique feeling to walk through the city. Very calming I’d say
Wat kunnen we in NL een skyscraper noemen? Volgens mij haalt dat hoogste in Den Haag het net niet...
@@intothelabyrinth01 er zijn een paar in Rotterdam en Amsterdam volgens mij. Alhoewel, ligt eraan wat je een wolkenkrabber noemt. We hebben gebouwen over 150 meter. Er is niet echt een universele hoogte dat een gebouw moet zijn voor dat het een wolkenkrabber wordt.
Ik woon in een boerderij in een klein dorp in het noorden
Grote steden zijn stom
In the netherlands i know Rotterdam has skyscraper, but only because the nazi's bombed all the city
Nederland beste land
There are skyscrapers, but they are built up in financial areas outside the city center,normally full of historical buildings and remains, so this can be kept unaltered👌🏻
Not in all European cities, espeically in the UK where cities like Manchester,Sheffield and Liverpool have their skyscraper/skyscrapers in the City centre not in any financial district at all either
@@Seagull81006 what does a appartement cost in one of those skycrapers?
@@Seagull81006 what? Have you ever been to London? The skyscrapers are only built in very specific areas, like the wharf
In Greece we also have an issue with earthquakes so that's an extra reason you aren't allowed to build above the height limit..
Speaking of earthquakes, do you know what the peak is for Amatrice? That of all the structures built in the center and its surroundings, the civic tower, which was the tallest structure in the town (village, maybe), remained standing, moreover the tallest structures suffer less from structural rejection, too bad I don't remember much of what I saw on the tv show "the engineering of epic fail", sure that all the buildings collapse at some point
@@marco_grt4460 the ground is not that suitable most of the country is hilly and rockie and there isn't much room to work with it also most Greek cities by American standards are more or less small to medium size towns so it doesn't makes much sense from financial point of view, it's the same reason why malls wasn't that successful either
Of course in Athens we have some skyscrapers mostly hospitals and office buildings but they are located far away from the" historic centre " because acropolis hill should be visible from as far as the human eye can catch it without being overshadowed by other buildings
Also note that in the early 20th century ( when that legislation was passed)" heavier " buildings in comparison to modern ones wasn't reacting that well during earthquakes and people afraid of them
Before even watching just based off that thumbnail I’m gonna say probably because those buildings are older than the United States all together
I live in Rome, skyscrapers would be a slap in tha face of the city.
To the city
unlike say the colosseum which was built for exquisite art performances such as executions and gladiator fights
I love Rome. Even the streets and the sidewalk is beautiful.
Skyscrapers will not suit rome
Ah yes slap with a block cash, tall buildings let the city grow and reduce prices, plus various business would put a lot of investments and would creat a lot of jobs for people living in the city. But yeah i guess old buildings over people
Because Europe builds cities where one actually wants to live
It artificially pumps land values up.
And yeah like no one wants to live in Toronto, Los Angeles or Singapore 😂
@@mayankmehtani7202 I agree, plus in cities like Geneva it's ridiculous that they just didn't start building skyscrapers yet, there is so many more people coming in every year and they just keep on building 3 floors block of flats like we have unlimited land😅
The largest cities in the world have skyscrapers so thats a false statement.
@@shalonsmith3653 If the city is large it does not necessarily mean it is automatically comfortable. Most probably the contrary is true
@@sergeibatiuk3468 it still means people want to live there
I remember how enraged Filipinos were when a tall condo building were erected behind the historic landmark of the monument of Dr. Jose Rizal. It was an eye sore and called national photobomber. Sadly, there's still no law in the Philippines banning the construction of buildings that ruin national landmarks.
The same is happening in Serbia, the biggest orthodox church temple and the history behind it is covered by a skyscraper and uneducated people support it. Now when you look at the older part of the city, you see only a skyscraper and a new 'dubai' rather than the culture which marked our presence
Ooh dude do you know that one big statue of like a budhist character somewhere in asia? So a rich man builds it but not to give prayers but to showoff his wealth so locals there just hate that statue and the mean
Yes! Nakakainis!
People need to get Duterte to respond to this issue. I think he can but maybe its too late already. The density of Manila asks for buildings to go vertical. Overall Philippines is a treasure that needs to be protected and greater effort by ordinary people to enforce a clean environment. Its a matter of economics and health as well. Cleaner cities just do better with more visitors.
@@jamesmedina2062 sadly POGO buildings built everywhere nowadays, especially here in cavite.
That’s beauty of europe, they don’t wanna ruin it which makes me so happy
I agree with you ! But on the other side, skyscrappers views are awesome two !
Makes me sad tho that sea levels are rising and europe is slowly sinking below sea level and could damage the beauty of europe :(
@@generalcomrade3352 Every country is slowly sinking though by the time Europe is underwater skyscrapers would also collapse
@@turntablescience1 but not in europe....xd
@@generalcomrade3352 The sea levels rising is not something new. The sea levels has been rising slow and steadily with aproxemately 20cm each century for at least the last 1000years.
Europe has probably the most gorgeus cities/villages I know of. It's very wise to keep their character. I'm glad they're preserving the very rich history and hope they continue to do so.
Obviously they do after destroying every others non-European civilizations buildings, history, and people
King Kai tough shit
@@kingkai2800 Damn we are badass😎
Corect me if i am wrong but as far as i know america doesn't really have old architecture to preserve...my country even has the ruins of a capital city from the years 100-200 but we were taught that america doesnt really have a history
@@kingkai2800 they were pretty good at it too
We love Europe the way it is. skyscrapers are ugly, I can never live on the 35th floor of a building.
Kinda true but there aren’t a lot in Toronto so
Ok boomer
Boomer moment...
You’re just broke hun
This has nothing to do with being a boomer ^^ I'm 23 and I see it the exact same way
I’m an European and I like it very much how it is.. I’ve been in many cities with skyscrapers and it was like the people were in a big prison.. as an example I loved Singapore but after a few days it got a little bit unpleasant not to see thing at great distances..
I live in a tiny town, surrounded by hills and nature, hundreds of years old. The house i live in is about 400 years old. It's great here.
Before i lived in Hamburg, which has so many parks and low buildings that in summer, the whole city disappears in trees. You didn't get suffocated by concrete&steel. You lived in a city, but didn't go crazy, smothered by it.
I love that , we sold our condo in downtown Calgary and moved to a very lovely newly built neighborhood it’s surrounded with green and trees 🌳 much more relaxing 😌
Woah it’ll be cool to check that out one day or something similar
@@amanlizamasha1937 that is why I love eastern Europe. So many hidden Valleys and old cathedral churches. So many places to discover but the ticket their is very expensive.
@@chronolynx360 ribe in denmark
And here in India urban life is disgusting. Here development means a sky-scrapper overlooking a great slum. With the combo of intense heat, pollution, congestion, lack of space, lack of greenery, extremely filthy places and most irresponsible citizens, Indian urban life is really disgusting..🤮. I really feel jealous on you.
That's why Europe is Beautiful! I live in Hamburg Germany it is a Green city the city full of parks and trees. The structures are old but it's amazing and i tend to wonder how it's made. And there's a lot of Medieval Towns that are well preserve i couldn't even get tired visiting them. I came from Manila a city that skycraper is everywhere can barely see a tree the polution is too much to handle that is why when i moved to Hamburg i fell inlove the city full of nature, so clean and green.
If i had plenty of money i would move out of this ticking time bomb of a country they call free,which is made up of 50 divided states
If only Manila can start over. Everything’s just filled with concrete and polluted rivers without much to freely breathe in. Parks are lacking, and there's just little to no proper urban planning. There's BGC, Makati CBD, and Eastwood, which are nice places, but they're just very small areas of Metro Manila. It's just bad for my lungs but all the jobs are here.
The provinces might not even be better either, as there are developers who just have no regard for the trees and build subdivisions everywhere in this small country. Kinakalbo na ang mga puno kaya madaling bahain at mainitan.
Also, how did you get into Germany? Must be really nice there.
@@achuuuooooosuu True! The Goverment is lack of plan for the nature instead they are more into developments of infrustructure and business growth they tend to forget that nature is part of it. The congestion of the city is suffocating without the tress, plants and animals. I came with family reunion visa. But if you are skilled worker it won't be hard for you to get here.
@@IchbinAmy Development is nice but they're forgetting the trees, yes. The Philippines is rich with natural resources though, the government could have used it sustainably but they weren't able to. I think it’s because the country's desperate to have nice buildings to the point where so many trees and natural resources are being cut down and unsustainably used just to achieve this.
Oh, I see, thank you. Enjoy your life in Germany! I wish I can migrate somewhere cleaner too someday. I think my course rn (art-related) doesn't fit for a skilled worker so I guess I'll be stuck here in Manila unless I get to save a lot lol
@@achuuuooooosuu Yes Our Country has so much to offer, from water to Land resources. Sometimes i get to think why Thailand has more exports of goods here in europe from fresh to cans ex. Banana blossom, jackfruits, coconuts vegetables and so much more in cans which i love to buy because as asian mas gusto ko pa din ng mga gulay na kilakakihan ko. Bakit tayo di natin kaya yun mas marami pa din ang imports kesa exports tapos nababaliwala ang sarili nating products at nalulugi ang mga farmers kasi mas binibigyan ng halaga ng goverments ang imports. We could be a rich country too kasi kung tutuuusin mayaman tayo sa resources. Anyway do not degrade yourself just because your proffesion is Art that is a Talent you should be thankful of. I wish for your Great success in the future 🙏
there’s a reason why europe has the best looking cities in the world
Cope
@@hiibillymayshere4238 cope with it lol
Best?😂
@@TheAgentOfDeath yes
@@hiibillymayshere4238 cope? I think you've got it backwards
I'm from Italy, Naples and I live in a palace that was built in the late 1600s
Naples is so beautiful! I fell in love with it when I visited. I'm jealous. You're lucky!
@@everysoundthereis yeah, thank you! But you know, there are many problems with the "efficiency" of Naples..
Beautiful city and probably one of the dirtiest ones I've ever seen. Garbage on the floor everywhere... So sad.
@@sonomatteo6533 Yes, like Enrique mentioned, I remember it had a lot of trash and such on the ground. Do you mean that?
@@everysoundthereis Not exactly. In this period the major of Naples is making progress with trash. I believe that our public transport is very bad, like the underground: too late with timetables
It's nice to know we have architects and urban planners who care about the aesthetics of the city and it's culture. Subscribed!
Rather they care about actual progress instead of style over substance.
Being low doesn't make a building beautiful.
@@joefox9875 Maybe not the building itself but the city
Lack of skyscrapers does not equal culture. New York City has hundreds of skyscrapers and is considered the cultural capital of the world. Skyscrapers are a major part of its culture, and similar to European cities, it has zoning regulations that protect sightlines to buildings like the Empire State Building.
I’d rather be able to afford a place but keep your spread out shoe boxes
Short answer: It's the law
Long answer: They wanted to make sure their history could be seen and not forgotten?
No Long Answer: They want to safeguard their networth which is locked in value of their houses. 63% of networth of French is locked in value of their houses, no surprises that Paris hates high rises that can bring thier networth down.
@@indianangel6774 they can afford it.
@@indianangel6774 especially France
Other countries obviously have plenty of history that can be seen in addition to having better skyscrapers.
No the answer is we could build skyscrapers but since we have so much ancient architecture sites and ruins it would be so ignorant to build stupid skyscreapers ruining our cultural values
It must be suffocating to live surrounded by skyscrapers omg 😮
as an american i stay as far away as i can from those.
@@theCosmicQueen bad choice. If you're American, your only choice sadly seems to be shitty suburbs or skyscraper cities. As bad as skyscrapers are compared to mid housing, it's better than living in single family suburbs. Though if you can, I suggest finding mid housing. Chicago is actually quite good with offering mid housing, if you go to the far North side like lake view.
@@tortellinifettuccinewhat about small towns and rural areas. You forgot about those
If europe start building skyscrapers they lose their enchant. They know why they dont do it, the magic will be gone if they ruin the structures.
My house was built by a Greek-Italian who fought in a war in 1779 and my house was built in 1791
Hello there
How did it ended up in your hands then?
@@questmarq7901 my grandpa was a bit rich and bought it and from then i still have it it is in zakuntos island
You must be rich man
Wow
@@Militos238 oh so its in greece then! Ok geia sou magka
In Ireland our soil is sedimentary, meaning you will hit water when you dig into the soil, therefore it won't support skyscrapers.
Oh cool, I bet u like it
I love ireland from sri lanka 🙂
My siri is set to irish accent lol
So when I Googled Ireland skyscrapers, all those pictures are fake?
@@soteful9949 yep, there’s actually a law that makes sure you don’t build past a certain height here in Ireland, that height is 60metres.
We once lived in New York, when I was a kid and live on the 5th floor of a 20 story apartment surrounded by many more tall buildings and I will say it's difficult to get fresh air, you have to constantly have the fan on at all times but I'm schooling in London now, I will just open my 2nd-floor window and the view is awesome.
I continue to be impressed with the conservation of buildings, including housing, in Europe. One may live in a 400 year old building with modern conveniences and a roof that does not leak. The building that houses my apartment was built in 1926 and the envelope of the building requires constant maintenance.
yes well they made them of solid stone a few feet thick. i stayed in some. We need a lot more stone houses in the usa. but it's not a developed industry and extremely expensive.
I love European cities, especially the old towns.
Mee too. Would be nice if we could afford living in them... but the shortage of living space is pressuring all the medium to low income people oit of the cities and the rich can move in...
Same
try sarajevo
@@zumzum3954 depends on the city.
@@nobodyinteresting9967 Bradford
I live near Warsaw - one of few European cities that have skyscrapers. Most European cities does not allow tall buildings to be built to protec historic centers odf cities. Warsaw don't have this problem because during II World War it was razed to the ground by Germans (80-90% of buildings were destroyed) , and after war, when Poland become communist state, polish goverment didn't want to rebuild destroyed "bourgeois tenements". In order to demonstrate the power of communism, a large (more than 200 m tall) skyscraper was erected in the city center on command of Stalin - Palace of Culture and Science. For patriotic and propaganda reasons, the most important fragments of the Warsaw's old town were also rebuilt, but the rest of the city were created according to the architectural assumptions of communist architects - socialist realism inspired by Bahaus - functional, uncomplicated buildings, often constructed of prefabricated elements - plenty of blocky gray apartment blocks. Also plenty of plots of land in the city center were undeveloped due to legal reasons (problems with establishing legal owners) and because of insufficient state capacity to remove all the war damage. So after Poland become capitalist, there was no contraindications to built scyscrapers - there were empty plots in centre of city, there was no view to protect, the construction of skyscrapers was economically profitable and there were companies willing to invest their money in it and also plenty of people wanted to "cover" Palace of Culture and Science by other skyscrapers.
And some people want communism...🙄🙄🙄. Anyway, love the lesson.
@@sm3675 If you are referring to social democracy it is by no means even close to communism.
Well it's a bit more complicated than this though. As the Old Town is on the Unesco Heritage Site list no skyscrapers should be seen from the Old Town. That's one of the rules. The natural light is the other when it comes to high-rise buildings in Poland. They mustn't block the natural light and the sunlight from residential buildings. The "covering" of the Palace of Culture and Science (PEKiN as Polish call it, which by the way is pronounced the same as Beijing in Polish) is more of an urban legend these days. There were plans to surround this building by other, taller, more modern skyscrapers but that recently has been abandoned as the city of Warsaw decided to build the museum of modern art (25 metres in height) in front of the palace. The city is transforming with a quite daring plans to turn about 30% of its public space into green spaces. In my own opinion Warsaw is heading in the right direction. All modern cities should focus on this. Skyscrapers should be built with the principle of saving land for the better use. It's not about the status anymore :)
communism did not prevent China from building modern and beautiful cities with skyscrapers .. here the problem is not communism or capitalism .. the problem is that the Poles have their hands growing out of their butts ..
@@rex30000 no it didn't The money tat could be diverted into communities, wages and overall well being of the people living in the shadows (literally) did.
I'm Italian, my answer to your question is: to not rape our natural and historical heritage and because a landscape made of skyscrapers looks just like sh*t to us. Sorry for the words but that was the quick way to explain it. It's ok seeing skyscrapers when we visit some foreign big city, but no one really wants them here.
What about Milan then
@@undeadbandit835 Well, I really think that Milan is one of the (very) few places where we have some skyscrapers (which, btw, are not comparable to the ones you can see in many US cities). And hey, we don't live in 1800 anymore, so it's quite inevitable that we have some skyscrapers here in Europe too. But the point is: we really don't have that many if compared to other countries or cities.
Most Americans don't want them here so we moved away from them . yes they look like shhht.
I love this video videos, it teaches me the basics aspect of real estate investment.
As an investor, it's almost inevitable that you're not going to experience ups and Down along the way of investing for yourself
If I had known that crypto would crash in price like it is, I could have sold my house and use the money to buy more then stock in real estate investment
But the crash in price of cryto doesn't affect my trade with expert mrs Annabella Ryan. She's the best crypto trading plug.
@@michealsunday6925 your right man, I never knew am gonna make good profit investing with Mrs Annabella Ryan.
@@klausstephan2047 one thing special about mrs Annabella Ryan, is the fact that she has the best trading strategies
I live in Portugal and we don't have skyscrapers. Skyscrapers are cool to see... in other countries :) I rather live in a low building city so I can see/feel the sun, and not walking on the street always in the shadow :)
Fine reasoning Vasco ,just like you would like to live only in a city of low roofed houses see the Sun set & rise surrounded by trees, so would I, so that I am woken up by the piping chirps of Robin's in the morning, rather than the unnecessary bright artificial lights of New York 's Fifth Avenue,Bombay, Delhi 's NCR with skyscrapers or any other cities proliferated with skyscrapers around the world like Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan, China's cities like Beijing, Shanghai, its Hainan province, ( after having damned Yang - shi Kiang river by the enormous Three Gorges, and the whole Pearl river delta occupied by large ugly cranes or in Japanese cities of Tokyo, Osaka, etc, I would certainly not like to live where I will only be surrounded by forests of concrete, older towns of Germany like' Horb am Neckar', in the South- west Germany around the famous Black forest would be my natural choice. 👍👍👍👌👌🙏🙏🙏
I hate the sun LOL
Yeah that's the thing, Skyscrapers puts a pricetag on all these things. The rich can afford the light the poor cannot.
@@DaDunge But do you want to be so rich, that you lose your joyful soul entirely. Find joy in small things, be interested in active entertainment like writing( make a dairy of want you have read) reading, gardening, Yoga, making home made food, ( till lockdown) then you can travel to little yet beautiful towns of European countries. You can explore forest like England's Sherwood forest, Kew gardens, Black forest of Germany. Avoid passive entertainment.
@@anuradhainamdar8967 What are you talking about?
Americans: why don't you build sky scrapers?
Chinese: yeah, what's wrong with ya!?
Europeans: can I have new park or garden instead?
President banned China from building skyscraper over 500meter for a while now.
cos most of the buildings are older than the US
I wouldn't call 500m a very restrictive law tho :')
Helps with decentralisation:
Less highrise, less need for big stores, less traffic.
Most americans dont actually like skyscrapers. Sure some do, but the vast majority see our big cities for the filthy places they are.
Nah. Visit America and you will see that 90% of the populated places here are filled with towns that have a ton of parks (no skyscrapers to be seen except for *some* cities but not the majority).
It is sad when I went to NYC there's a lot of old buildings and statues but they are dismissed by the skyscrapers and are easily missed
Only if you have blinders on. You still see the beauty of the statues. Central Park is absolutely beautiful. I'm living in a concrete jungle right now and it isnt even in the US. Its Basel Switzerland. From where I'm at it's an 15 minute tram ride or 45 minute walk to a nice greenspace. The parks that are near me is concrete with rocks. Around the play structure there's wood chips. I miss New Yorks parks. I miss having a 5 minute walk to Central Park.
they tore down some of the most beautiful old mansions like from 1800s- early 1900's.
Correction: Skyscrapers represents pollution and human’s damage on the planet in addition to being extremely overcrowded and very unpleasant to live at. It doesn’t represent economy. Because if you are rich you would have bought out the entire land for yourself evicting everyone else.
That ain’t a correction, people need skyscrapers for money to provide for the earth
what a stupid statement. Europe has been declining for decades now. Skyscrapers represent the advance in population which means a bigger economy, more jobs and workforce. Look at asian countries
@@ewcho8995 yep
Im Czech, and i would like keep historical city districts, and just make skycrapers in more modern areas and new zones.
Or you know... Whole new cities could be established...
@@Megalomaniakaal Not possible, already too dense settlement grids in CZ. Thus would immediately cause backslash from various interest groups, NIMBY and agromafia that already started opposition against HSR. They will use false claims about lack of arable land even thou that they have to be already subsidized and roughly 1/3 is not even used for food production they base their argumentation on. (not to mention that with their approach the soil will soon be completely dead) And many people will jump on their bandwagon.
This is the best of both worlds i think. Like Paris with its La Defence district.
souhlasím (I agree)
Czech Rep. is one of the most beautiful and at the same time unluckiest country in Europe Communism damaged so much the culture is a joy for the eye seeing it as is it becoming now ... in 20-40 years it will be one of the best countries in the world if everything goes well
I feel safer around lower buildings.
Same now that i think of it
high rise buildings are death traps anyway. Basically have no way of escaping a raging fire on a high level floor
@@XAkiraOtakuX Stairs.
@@XAkiraOtakuX lol, parachute homie🪂
@@synex3219 As if untrained people can safely navigate with a parachute in an enclosed street.
Sky scrapers is that kind of thing you feel impressive at first then you hate it so much after a period of time.
True
Been obsessed with skyscrapers for 10 years now, but European buildings are good looking too. Something different from the rest of the world
I'm from Tajikistan🇹🇯, we don't have both no Skyscrapers no historical buildings in our cities and we are good 😀💫🌏❤️
Long Story short: we don’t Build skyscraper because we have architecture which is so beautiful and needs to be protected. London will solve their Problem before it goes critical. Skyscrapers are ego towers.
That's why most Europeans countries suck, The way their governed is pretty good, the govt and healthcare and key infrastructure which are really good but when comes to landscape and how appealing buildings look, it ranks pretty low since they look really depressing and just the same, were are not in 1900 to look at such boring buildings with same ugly designs, it doesnt look nice, just old and gross
@@haruiox2368 "boring buildings with same ugly desings"
*starts constructing similar and boring looking skyscrapers*
@@haruiox2368 you good bro?
@@haruiox2368 This is pure blasphemy. Have you been in Florence? Barcelona? Paris? ANYWHERE?!?!
@@haruiox2368 Those "old and gross" buildings looks better than your most of your skyscrapers 😂
I think La Defense is a perfect example of skyscrapers being build right. Away from historic buildings, but still close enough to the city centre. Also: you don’t need skyscrapers to have cheap rent, look at Vienna.
Its actually often the opposite. The high-rises with cheap rents are fugly ghettos. Nobody likes them. And the bank towers or luxury towers are too expensive.
@@fjellyo3261 normal people housing is just the least profitable thing there is.. So no investor would build a 300 meter tall tower with housing for normal people.
@@SimonRaahauge1973 true. That's why mixed use is the best solution at the moment. Like 30% of new build apartments in a house/project are for less wealthy families.
@@fjellyo3261 mixed use, rent regulation, medium density. and all kind of fascilities in walking distance.
@@fjellyo3261 But you know that “fugly ghettos” have much more background behind them, you cannot just write off their existence and their history by attributing their problems to population density.
Yeah cheeper apartments but at the same time more crowded cities
Imagine the Eiffel Tower hidden due to ugly gray 200 storey buildings..😵
This.
The Eiffel tower itself is a sort of skyscraper and has ruined the city
Yeah thats why millions of tourists visit paris every month just to see that ugly thing. It also looks like so many other skyscrapers. I have one in my backyard
Crazy Chaos Exactly, it's a weird thing. People come to see it for the ads alone, not its beauty. People come to visit Paris for things other then the tower alone
@@sergeibatiuk3468 Dream on!
Americans: Why don't Europeans build skyscrapers?
Europeans: We know how to build cities. We're doing it for over 2700 years now.
American: That doesn't answer my question European. Please clean your ears out.
@@Monaleenian Cities in Europe are historical so to build a skycrapers needs space and we dont have space. Just enjoy the small and beautiful buildings
@Storm Zaibot i think those are the native indians who were killed and chased away from their homeland. I dont think they are even recognized as americans by the same people who chased them away lmao
@Storm Zaibot they are still there but you can count their settlements on one hand compared to the cities built by the people who chased them away. The massive bulk of the real americans are composed of immigrants and not the original settlers. Those same immigrants were the one who chased away and kept building all these massive cities and skycrapers we all see today. I dont think you can even call the native indians americans because you can barely see their ancestry nowadays. You need to relearn history.
Well said.
As a Londoner, I'd love to not be broke asf each month. Still can't believe even in places like Tokyo. I hear other Europeans shocked at how expensive it is to live in Tokyo yet all I hear it that its still cheaper than London
I live in Bangkok, quite pricey but compared to London and Tokyo it’s not. I’ve seen taxi meters in those cities resemble a stop watch in how fast they go up.
@Jak świat się kręci. Not only I'd love to not be broke. I'd love to own property. But I'm not rich or old so I don't have enough to buy. I'm stuck with sky high rent prices. Since it's where my family is from and we are from low income, once you go broke in London you'll struggle to save enough to leave.
@Jak świat się kręci. I'd need a new job in a different area and that means I'd get denied for renting else where since you need good referrals from your employer and even renting you need a large deposit. More so a thing that takes years to do. Buying is worse. My area of London it now takes 23 years of saving for the deposit on a mortgage.
Well unless the new job is a really big well known company or service like the police but I can't join police bc medical reasons. Which I wish I could. And they get paid so much here
Tokyo Is just OP since Its The only Big City They got
0:06 ah yes, Pokyo the city of skyscrapers, how nice
Without watching the above video I can confidently say that in most of European countries we have laws to protect listed buildings and also planning regulations. However, some of our European cities have skyscrapers. We kind of like to preserve our history, when possible.
The problem is that europe destroy other countries histories. Just see syrian history sites. The other thing is that europe, except italy and greece, dont have history. If you go to thier museums, you will find that 90% of old items are stolen and brought to europe fram Asia and Africa.
@@user-cs2ri7ju7c yeah, maybe and not all Europe but some nations more than others (like the Saudis have bombed Yemen or the Morish expansion in the middle ages or the ottoman empire was stopped on the outskirts of Vienna). However, you are totally off topic. Stop antagonising, it is pointless, man.
In my country Greece we torn old houses apart in the 70s - 80s and 90s just to build ungly apartment blocks , i want to say to friends from other countries that their economies started grow the recent years: Respect the old buildings , don't make the same mistakes
Yeah, same in Las Palmas
Έχουμε νόμο που δεν επιτρέπει την κατασκευή ουρανοξυστών
@@johnhave1291 in English, please
@@joseluis7936 he said we have laws that doesn't allow skyscrapers to be built althougth i would argue that yes we had them, if the elliniko project go ahead athens would have six new skyscrapers... athens need more high rise buildings but mostly in the suburbs and not the city intra murus .
@@Inzanityshots thank you
I'm Parisian and also lived in London and Copenhagen. We love our cities as they are.
We like to see the sky, the panorama, having narrow streets and historical buildings. In French we say "à taille humaine" (human sized).
Oui exact
Human scale is the same phrase in english, that’s not some special french phrase lol
@@fishingoutofwater it's not exactly the same tho
@@florimond. it literally is, “human scale” is a very common phrase in english for urban planning. I know you love to think french people are special but it’s not true lol
@@fishingoutofwater that's not what I'm trying to say, in French "à taille humaine" doesn't have the exact same meaning as "human scale" even though they have the same definition...
What’s the point having a compact area and land not being used when u can use that area to have nice small homes 😁
I love living in Europe. We're more focused on green life. Everywhere u look its a dreamland💛
Except the U.K., this place is just ugly
@@SharveyPlays you must see the non touristic places of Spain then hahahahha
@@pepecastejon9867 Bilbao and northern Spain is magical and far better than the rest of Spain In my opinion. It very underrated and gets almost no international tourism
That bit about the skyscraper in Paris reminds me, there was an artist who used to claim that his favorite place to eat was at the restaurant in the Eiffel Tower because it was the only place he didn't have to look at the Eiffel Tower.
it was considered a massive eyesore at first
Love the story! The tower is definitely historic, a testament to the strength and versatility of wrought iron as a building material, but let's face it.., just as the critics of the day were constantly pointing out, it's quite ugly. Marketing propaganda is still used against anyone willing to make such a statement. Another example of "The Emperor's New Clothes" syndrome. France is world renowned for its art.., so -- How could anything French be ugly? -- is the common question asked of people that don't agree. A stupid argument, if you ask me. But! You aren't, and I don't care.
@@johnlshilling1446 Ugly? What the fuck are you talking about, it is aesthetically perfect, radial symmetric, and above all dominant while not vulgar.
That is Guy the Mopassant
@@viniciusmagnoni6492 it's a pylon
Simple answer: Europeans appreciate culture
@@epg96 Some european cities exist longer than many countries, and they still stand to this day. Earthquakes don't happen randomly across the world. Some places get many earthquakes and some get none, Europe gets none.
@@epg96 Turkey and Greece aren't the Europe I'm talking about, by Europe I meant Germany, the Netherlands, France and so on. Turkey always gets hit by earthquakes, it's nothing new......
Italy gets hit by earthquakes once in a while aswell but not as frequently
Turkey is not even in Europe lol
Unaffordable housing is an interesting aspect of a culture...
Skyscrapers do rarely lower rents. The higher the more costly they are to build. All the skyscrapers in the Middle East are only built as status symbols to show: "we can afford this!", not for rational economic reasons. The situation is somewhat different in places like Shanghai, Singapore, Hongkong, where space on the ground is very limited and expensive - but even there the highest scyscrapers are not built as residential buildings for the many, but mostly for show with some luxury apartments mixed in. And nearly no European would want to live in the residential high-risers of Singapore. There are some older high-rise residential buildings to find all over Europe, but they have often a very poor reputation.
The skyscrapers in the "financial districts" of Paris, London and Frankfurt were also not built because they are economically feasible. They were built solely for status and representation (and were often difficult to fill).
There is however also one German regulation which makes it difficult to use the room in skyscrapers efficiently for offices: Industrial health and safety regulations state that each office has to have access to natural light - in other words: its own window. Which you'll not find in the center of most big skyscrapers...
I like that fact that they keep their area looking awesome like that
I live in Belgrade, Serbia, and here they've been destroying all the small pretty old houses since the 90s, it is all becoming ugly gray buildings and skyscrapers now :(
Noooo :’((
Belgrade was largely destroyed by German bombing during WWII.
Plus jebeni Beograd na vodi. Nervira me sto neobrazovani idioti smatraju da cemo tako postati moderni ili slicno. Uzas
@@rishimranjit9218 Zürich is one of the biggest economic centres in Europewith 600k population and has only 2 skyscraper. There are less developed cities with more skyscrapers than Zürich. Your point?
@Caesarre europeans wants their history seen unlike your america they have no history
No skyscrapers for Europe, please and thank you - I (and I believe vast majority of Europeans) love the soul, history and beauty of our cities 💖
Its funny an american makes some end rant about lobying being the problem while every europian in the comments simply doesnt like skyscrapers
@TheComengSpotter575 Fine, that's your opinion. I stated mine in my comment.
@TheComengSpotter575
Yeah, and they are easier to hit with airplanes, just ask the New Yorkers...
@TheComengSpotter575 skyscrapers are just ugly big building that light up at night, no history, no meaning. Just tall ugly building
@@nondesperado shots fired
I was born and live in London and am STILL discovering the City and it's historic buildings.I would much prefer to live in this environment ..It's defenately less offensive,and hugley comferting to live around history!!
Tbh cities without such skyscrapers are more beautiful
The difference is the fact that the cities on the eastern side of the Atlantic have histories going back thousands of years.
As a european i love europe preventing skyscrapers to ruin everything and still being pretty much the powerhouse of the world
@@epg96 tsunami, in europe, nahhh, do your research before commenting negative comments. And europe isnt and wont have any housing crisis cuz population growth in europe is already very stable and its growing just a bit each year. Europe aint africa or asia where there are mostly just developing countries. Europe is pretty much fully developed so dont expect housing crisis in europe like there are in africa.
@@epg96 well europe is known for high rents, also who said i am from berlin😂
And there are no tsunamies in berlin😂
@@epg96 i didnt say anything about earthquakes, ik that earthquakes are very common in mostcof the europe but ppl just live with it, but i said about tsunamies😂😂😂
@@epg96 well who said all skyscrapers are anti earthquake buildings
@@epg96 ummm... are even listening cuz i said "who said *all* skyscrapers are anti earthquake buildings". Also europeans live with earthquakes for thousands of years and still going strong as a powerhouse of the world. So why would european mayors destroy their beautifull cities skyline and views, just for something europeans live with for thousands of years.
Warsaw in Poland is like a mix of the two - has some sky-scrapers, but at the same time there are many historical buildings and architecture.
I live in Germany and we have some "skyscrapers" but I think they are brutally ugly in general.
The 50 to 80s buildings are ugly. Yes. But Frankfurt and the Berlin skyscrapers are beautiful
Berlin has no skyscraper
@@KEJALBAB well the taller buildings above 100m. I know they r no skyscrapers
I find it way nicer to have lower but dense buildings with pedestrian small streets, than having skyscrappers seperated my 5 lane roads...
Don't know about skyscrapers but my country could use some 5 lane roads.
Some MORE 5 lane roads I meant.
Better than 1 road and tiny houses
@@lautheimpaler4686 well a few of them but the USA has too much of that. uglyness in cities. Need them only outside of cities.
The biggest amount of cities in Europe were founded in medieval times and now they want to save history of this cities
I live in Vienna in Austria, one of the biggest historic cities
so interesting! i was supposed to visit vienna in July 2020 but it was cancelled due to covid :(
And all the major cities in Europe look so so much breathtaking than most cities in the states.
You can almost feel like you moved back in time in some cities
Imagine living in the lowest floor of the skyscrapper and having another 5 of these around you... living in the dark 🤣 thanks a lot
There’s space between skyscrapers…
its the same than living in London
@@urbanistgod So you love watching streets?
@@hanspeter1078 Aren’t you watching streets when you live in a normal not very high building ?
They put officies and shop there
I'm from Germany and I think that skyscrapers ruin the view and the feeling of ancient city centers. It's the same with some new modern glass or abstract buildings right next to old ones. That doesn't fit at all.
In Cologne there is a law that buildings mustn't have a certain height so that you can see the cathedral from every direction. That's the reason why some companies built deeper into the ground and have more basement floors.
Frankfurt am Main (Main is a river's name) is the only larger city here in Germany with more skyscrapers and they are all office buildings from different banks (Frankfurt is the financial center here). Therefore it has a very unique skyline and is lovely called "Mainhattan"
@TheComengSpotter575 But underground bases are cooler...
In Melbourne, Australia we have cities side by side with buildings from the 1800s and I don't really bat an eye.
@@danielawesome36 yes
069
@@Dylan-bc2po The 1800s? Wow... that's impressive.
Skycreepers are just ugly to look at. It has problems getting fresh air, especially on higher levels, and who wants to either depend on elevator you''re spending minutes in or climb thousands of stairs (okay, you wouldn't need a gym anymore, but...).
I enjoy walking through my city of Toronto and seeing the beautiful big tall buildings blended in with the cool public sculptures and parks/gardens mixed in. We also have big forests and fields of grass and farm land like maybe 30-40 mins out of the city(that’s with the common traffic but it’s really not that far). Unfortunately we don’t have the insane castles and cathedrals but you can’t have it all right?
I live in Montevideo. The highest building (and there are just a handful of them) is some 100 mts tall. I'm happy. All the ramblas of Montevideo are a pleasure for any eyes. Things like Dubai are not for humans.
Bien dicho!
Montenegro?
@@Polai010 Montevideo
I have been to Montevideo a couple of years ago. It was so pretty!
Montevideo, Uruguay
It's illegal how Underrated this guy is
Why is it illegal? That's what is being explained here.
@@LeeMakwiny jesus christ. thats not what he means. he means this channel is so underatted that it should be illegal.
It’s illegal how you don’t know another channel: B1M
@@keithngho7466 ???
Perhaps because he copies other people's content ? czcams.com/video/EVJ_rgEUSJE/video.html
Just look at the center of Zagreb, Croatia. Nice little city center in classical architectural style and some asshole decided in 1958 to build a skyscraper in the middle of it.
Honestly, it looks appalling. I have nothing against skyscrapers in old cities, but keep them on the peripheral parts of city.
maybe the city should demolish it.
I am living in germany right now and I love that there no big citys like new york I like that there is small city fields small city fields and so on... ofcourse there are some big citys like Frankfurt am Main but still it somehow dosent desturb the nice view ☺
Cities with skyscrapers are dark. The sun is always covered by buildings. It's depressing.
It depends on the city. Some cities have a mix of nature and urban
? IMO they are always brighter, because skyscrapers are normally covered by glass, and they reflect sunlight. UK countryside are the darkest places on the planet.
@@hanabisenju9051 That's because of the weather, not because of the lack of glass surfaces
@@MatmoeLP Yes I complain about UK countryside weather whenever I have slight chance. But the glass surface factor is major imo, it's just simple physics.
In Sydney, if gives us a good shade from that menacing sun.
Very misleading to say that skyscrapers will lower the rent, just look at every major city with skyscrapers in the US that's where rent is at its highest.
Yep, it was pretty misleading. Most of the skyscrapers are not even residential buildings, they are office buildings.
The point is that having more accommodations overall lowers the rents on average (supply and demand).
@@user-ly1fk9kk9d I guess he meant office rent?
It's not...increase in building density & numbers of humans in one specific area will prop up the rent.. a scheme to juice their wallet all together.. instead of juicing few of them at a time on a single plot of land.. with skyscraper hundreds ,thousands at a time..the modern milking machine..
Skyscraper cost shit load of money to build that why most of them are office building since big company can afford them. The only so few that have housing unit are expansive too and most likely only the upper middle class and above can afford to live in them.
Europe's population is also more evenly spread out than in North America. NYC have next to 1/2 of the state's population, NYC metro (I know it's cross nearby state but still) have about the same population of NY state ; Chicago's metro area have 2/3 of Illinois's population ; Houston & LA's metro both have 1/4 the population of their respective state (Texas & California).
Toronto, Montreal & Vancouver Canada have about 1/2 of their province's population, these 3 cities alone have more than 1/3 of the country's population.
In comparison Paris and London have about 1/5 of France & UK's population; Madrid have 1/6 of Spain ; Madrid 1/15, Moscow 1/5 etc.
Major cities of Europe. The second image is Zurich, Switzerland. Nice one!
The concept of sky scrapers was introduced by Charles-Édouard Jeanneret (Le Corvusier) - an architect born in Switzerland and settled in Paris
The short answer will be that some of the buildings in Europe have stood for a thousand years and will still be here long after the skyscraper's have crumbled.
@Uncle Pete not always but most if the time new is better
@@TonyMontana-fs3lu no, not really. old is still standing, how is that not better than new?
@@gurupilates
Just because a part of a structure is standing after 1k years, doesn't mean it's better than the new stuff with better materials.
1) The ancient structures that survived, did so because they haven't experienced as much wear and tear as the ones that did not, and had undergone conservation efforts, the only roman roads that exist today are the ones that were hardly used, just a few months of highway traffic would've destroyed them to the point of looking like a dirt path, there's no guarantee that you'd be able to tell there was ever a roman cobbled road there.
The buildings that survived are the ones that had extremely bulky structure (by modern standards)
The only exception are buildings that were under intensive and extensive conservation for centuries, like Notre Dame, which burned up, recently, due to dry wood accumulated during those conservation efforts. (most of which were pre-modern)
If the ancients were to subject their buildings to the same strain as we do ours, they'd be piles of indiscernible rubble after decades.
2) There's more to the quality of an object than just durability, and modern is just more comfortable, cost effective and safer.
-Cars are a great example, since they've progressed much faster than buildings, cars in the 50' would likely kill you in a 40km/h (relative) crash, while we now have people routinely surviving crashes in excess of 100km/h.
-Today we can build buildings that put the Colosseum to shame with their size, without the need for multiple decades of working milions of slaves to death.
-Today's buildings are much more comfortable than anything anyone but the top 0.0001% lived in centuries ago.
@@My_initials_are_O.G.cuz_I_am i live in a house from the 12th century, I just don't agree with you. The US has nothing older than some 200 years anyways . It is not about building things "that put the Colosseum to shame", it's about culture existing before in whichever century in Europe, when the US wasn't even an idea.
@TheComengSpotter575 what, you measure it with 'who has a bigger one? That's not how it works 😂😂😂
I used to live in York, in England, and there is a height limit not allowing any building to be taller than the cathedral built by William the conqueror. It's a really nice place, I miss it :(
In those small alleyways it's nice to look up and see the cathedral so that you know where you are
And theirs pub's on every corner, but some the ceiling is so low after a few you don't realise the mind you're head sign or forget from the floor to the ceiling is abart 6 foot 3 inches in york.
Should be more safety on the river Ouse as well at lendal bridge, killed a few has that river
Gayyyy
R a luv t play hide the sausage tha knows. R didcha no
Same happens in Cordoba, Spain. They have the Mosque (now Cathedral) which dates from as far as the 10th Century, so they make sure you can see it on the city skyline.
I found the title inaccurate. There are absolutely skyscrapers in many European cities; they just aren’t often in the center of a city like they are in the US. They’re usually farther from the city center so as to protect historic architecture, and sometimes not even in the city itself, but in the suburbs. :)
Europe looks beautiful without skyscrapers, hope I'll visit oneday..
Honestly, in my hometown (in belgium) they recently built a new appartement and the people already started complaining the skyline was ruined (cus before that, there were only 2 cathedrals, a church and another medival building that rose above it.)
Edit: Honestly, i really think skiescrapers are the solution but it has to be in a zone where they don't interfere with the skyline (so not like they did in Brussels) but rather something like they did in Paris with "La defence"
Ah oe?? Ils l’ont fait dans quelle commune?
As a fellow belguimer i agree
Just build it on the stupid football fields. There are to much of them in Belgium
Or they could at least build them so they look pretty. Imagine a skyscraper build in Gothic architecture style or Rococo... I think people wouldn't complain about them as much if the new buildings would just match the old ones xD
@@IsleNaK true. but only go 7 stories. 12 at most. maybe a few towers like castle towers attached.
Viena is a good example of affordable housing without spreading out or high rises.
@Simon Eminger WOW....ONE Building! Its not so high as it was planed!
Because of low population
I think Vienna is not very nice to people from another cities
@@ibrahimosama6758 Realy? How do you know?
@@WienerVL I have read about their visa laws and citizenship laws
I used to live in a village in germany what was build or more recognized first in the 990's by a city nearby. Guess people lived there for a long time
technically there are skyscrapers in Europe but they're very rare
I'm glad there are few sky scrapers in Europe. They are often so ugly and generic and limit sun light and increase traffic
Although less means they need to build out more land mass wise therefore also making traffic worse
They skyscrapers are not ugly they are amazing
@@carmelsmores5160 They are ugly. It's just a tower made out of glass and cement. Keep them at financial districts like Frankfurt , but not in antique places.
@@majesticagent5251 ah yes but boring old boxes made of stone and brick are breathtaking and must be preserved at all costs
@@rasheedk219 Yeah because they have history and they are part of the culture. Imagine how boring everything would be if skyscrapers are everywhere. Why would you travel then if everything looks the same?
The one city in The US that has no skyscrapers is Washington DC and for many of the same reasons as Paris and London. They have a lot of height restrictions to preserve the monuments and historical buildings sight lines. Also much like Paris right outside of the city limits of DC in Maryland and Virginia they have many tall office buildings and apartments.
No building in DC can be taller than the Washington monument according to city code
London has skyscrapers. The Shard, The Gerkhin, the business district is full of them.
@@cyanoticspore6785 Yeah I know he explained that and he made it clear they designed the city in a way that the skyscraper Wouldn’t block the view for many of the national historic sites.
Washington DC has Skyscrapers and tall buildings.
@@Passportbros8 sure if you consider 200ft (60m) a skyscraper
In the UK, we are building/have built lots of skyscrapers, especially in London and Manchester, both of which have some of the UK’s tallest buildings. Outside of london, it seems as if skyscrapers/tall high rises are built with 0 regard for history as well. Thankfully, i’d say most UK skyscrapers arent a eyesore and look alright to be fair
The quote about the view from Tour Montparnasse was originaly about Eiffel Tower. ^^