Berkeley restaurants faced with having to pay to keep parklets

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 19. 05. 2024
  • Outdoor dining may not be here to stay for many restaurants in Berkeley. Velena Jones reports.
    Stay connected:
    Follow us on Twitter: / nbcbayarea
    Like us on Facebook: / nbcbayarea
    Follow us on Instagram: / nbcbayarea
    Follow us on TikTok: / nbcbayarea
    Catch up on all the day's news:
    www.nbcbayarea.com
    Download our mobile app:
    On iOS: nbcbay.com/R1BhqYM
    On Android: nbcbay.com/rUcA97h
    Watch us on OTT:
    Add our channel on Roku: bit.ly/3ySK60j
    Download our app on Amazon Fire TV: amzn.to/3FmmiEA

Komentáře • 23

  • @keithkirk8697
    @keithkirk8697 Před 23 dny +2

    Hey, my neighborhood! Saul's and Crepevine don't cause any problem for pedestrians but it's true that the parking spaces removed for their benefit during the pandemic would bring in a good chunk of cash at two dollars an hour. The place that takes up several parking spaces and whose customers tend to mindlessly block the pavement is The Cheese Board BTW. The city's offer to let the restaurants have the space for free if it's open to the public seems pretty generous. Not many people are going to sit at a restaurant table without ordering. Maybe they're worried that the homeless people evicted from People's Park will move into the "parklets."

  • @user-yg1cp2yi1e
    @user-yg1cp2yi1e Před 24 dny +12

    Well yeah - they have taken exclusive occupancy of a public space. The public should be compensated for that occupancy.

    • @DxModel219
      @DxModel219 Před 24 dny +1

      not that easy. government forced businesses to occupy public space or shutdown and now forcing them to pay fines/fees without compensation. Businesses can make a case.

    • @DxModel219
      @DxModel219 Před 23 dny +1

      @@NathanielKrefman compensation for outdoor buildouts, furnitures. If you knew the cost of running businesses and not be ticks all day you would’ve already figured it out.

    • @DxModel219
      @DxModel219 Před 23 dny

      @@NathanielKrefman not the same. being forced to move outdoors due to a government mandate is different from a lease.

  • @ramencurry6672
    @ramencurry6672 Před 23 dny +1

    Love dining out. Delicious foods!

  • @propblast82nd
    @propblast82nd Před 23 dny +1

    They need the money

  • @citticat2
    @citticat2 Před 23 dny +2

    Just another expense that will be passed on the patrons - it you can even afford to eat out anymore.

    • @sneat2028
      @sneat2028 Před 22 dny

      Nope! The expense has nothing to do with operations, they're not necessary.

  • @Recklessyettie
    @Recklessyettie Před 23 dny

    Hell yeah!!! Lets go I hate parklets...

  • @shiveringnerve
    @shiveringnerve Před 24 dny +2

    america is the land of the fee.

  • @Be_a_Pineapple
    @Be_a_Pineapple Před 23 dny +2

    I rather see outdoor seating than cars.

    • @brianp5205
      @brianp5205 Před 23 dny

      Id rather see cars than outdoor seating.

  • @misterkiller89
    @misterkiller89 Před 23 dny +1

    So...the city is penalizing small restaurants for profit?...This is pathetic. Let the restaurants keep their outdoor spaces, we have the weather and space for it.

  • @alihakimi1707
    @alihakimi1707 Před 23 dny

    rent def needs to be charged, but the city needs to provide additional parking elsewhere

  • @Queen-dl5ju
    @Queen-dl5ju Před 23 dny +2

    more fees to pay for more free needles for homeless