How Decision Making is Actually Science: Game Theory Explained

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 27. 05. 2024
  • With up to ten years in prison at stake, will Wanda rat Fred out? Welcome to game theory: looking at human interactions through the lens of mathematics. Want to learn more? Join Hank Green and play along in this fun new episode of SciShow!
    ----------
    Support SciShow by becoming a patron on Patreon: / scishow
    ----------
    Dooblydoo thanks go to the following Patreon supporters -- we couldn't make SciShow without them! Shout out to Kevin Bealer, Justin Lentz, Mark Terrio-Cameron, Patrick Merrithew, Accalia Elementia, Fatima Iqbal, Benny, Kyle Anderson, Mike Frayn, Tim Curwick, Will and Sonja Marple, Philippe von Bergen, Chris Peters, Kathy Philip, Patrick D. Ashmore, Thomas J., charles george, and Bader AlGhamdi.
    ----------
    Like SciShow? Want to help support us, and also get things to put on your walls, cover your torso and hold your liquids? Check out our awesome products over at DFTBA Records: dftba.com/scishow
    ----------
    Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
    Facebook: / scishow
    Twitter: / scishow
    Tumblr: / scishow
    Instagram: / thescishow
    ----------
    Sources:
    www.khanacademy.org/economics...
    levine.sscnet.ucla.edu/general...
    assets.cambridge.org/97805213/...
    • GTO-7-03: The Shapley ...
    link.springer.com/chapter/10.1...
    www.gametheory.net/dictionary/...
    Image Links:
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Fo....

Komentáře • 2,6K

  • @kjs8719
    @kjs8719 Před 4 lety +1411

    Watching this in 2020.
    "Did you interact with anyone today?"
    No. No I did not.

    • @tarananantasagar2999
      @tarananantasagar2999 Před 4 lety +5

      factsssssssssssss

    • @proprietor4417
      @proprietor4417 Před 4 lety

      Lock down

    • @proprietor4417
      @proprietor4417 Před 4 lety +1

      Corona bias

    • @kjs8719
      @kjs8719 Před 4 lety +2

      I went to drop off some toilet paper to a friend, thinking I was going to leave it on her porch and back away.
      She opened the door, grappled my shirt, dragged me in, and through me on the bed.
      If that's the way isolation effects women, this can go on forever 🤣

    • @ahsanhabibsowrav7313
      @ahsanhabibsowrav7313 Před 4 lety +2

      Only 20's kid will understand

  • @matthughes65
    @matthughes65 Před 6 lety +1275

    "Did you interact with anyone today?" ha... ha...

  • @AwokenEntertainment
    @AwokenEntertainment Před 2 lety +155

    Love how you break-down what is common sense to most.. it really forces me to understand why I think a certain way in situations where I'd normally think automatically

    • @haythmman
      @haythmman Před 2 lety +3

      you can gain a better understanding of how the mind works in the Critique Of Pure Reason by Kant.

    • @henrykashyap8913
      @henrykashyap8913 Před 11 měsíci

      Most of the investor thinks like that.... Simple And normal thing....

  • @jinjeredge
    @jinjeredge Před 3 lety +45

    5:55 "DUMMY PLAYERS HAVE ZERO VALUE"
    *Luigi* would like to speak with you.

    • @evm6177
      @evm6177 Před 3 lety +3

      🍷😆 Yessa wella it issa abouta timezee we have a little chat about zzaat!⌚

    • @wingedhussar6624
      @wingedhussar6624 Před 3 lety

      @@evm6177 Lets wait for some italian guys to resspondd to yorr comment

  • @MindYourDecisions
    @MindYourDecisions Před 7 lety +3569

    There is a big mistake in this video. The definition of "Nash equilibrium" in the video is actually the definition for a strictly dominant strategy: "A player in a game has found A STRICTLY DOMINANT STRATEGY when they make the choice that leaves them better off no matter what their opponents decide to do.”
    In the prisoner's dilemma, each player has a strictly dominant strategy to confess--it's better NO MATTER what others do.
    A Nash equilibrium, by contrast, is when each player has a strategy that is better GIVEN what others are doing. Each person is doing the best to outguess others, and mutually each person is playing a best response.
    Here's an example to illustrate the difference. Do you drive on the left side of the road or the right? There is no choice better for you "no matter" what others do. Your best choice is to match what others do: you drive on the left if others do, and you drive on the right if others do too. This game does not permit a strictly dominant strategy. But there are two Nash equilibria--when everyone drives on the left, or everyone drives on the right.
    Very few games have strictly dominant strategies. In contrast, every game* has a Nash equilibrium (*under certain conditions) Nash proved the existence of the equilibrium in his doctoral thesis at Princeton, and that is work for which he was recognized with a Nobel Prize and is the subject of the book/movie "A Beautiful Mind."
    I mostly liked this video and the Shapley value example is good. But the definition of the Nash equilibrium is a big error--perhaps include a note or annotation?

    • @BennKay
      @BennKay Před 7 lety +176

      Thank you for an insightful comment! It makes a nice change from the constant babel

    • @anshuman8949
      @anshuman8949 Před 6 lety +36

      Thank you Presh for the explanation

    • @arbenmana8219
      @arbenmana8219 Před 6 lety +27

      Funky Com Lag Cat The logic is that each player is rewarded for the help that they gave the other, regardless of their personal skill. Think of it like this: If I made 10 cookies and sold them for 10 dollars, I would only make 10 dollars. Same for you, if you only made 20 cookies and sell them you would make 20 dollars. However, when teamed up, we make 10 extra cookies. Now lies the question, how much does teaming up with you benefit me? (And the other way around). That is what we are trying to determine. I am no pro at this either, but from what I have looked up so far this is what I was able to make up.

    • @briseboy
      @briseboy Před 6 lety +30

      Another mistake is to ignore the differences in optimum outcomes - whether selfish or no - that must occur when the game is repeated. After a certain number f repetitions, the best personal outcome differs quite a LOT!
      While prisoner's dilemma posits two self-interested players, excluding any others affected by players' actions, that presumption falsifies any biological organism's reality.
      Further, temporally delayed response remains a factor in real situations.
      Game Theory DOES consider such reality, but within the complexity so brushed off by the video, other equilibria exist.
      ANYONE interested in social dynamics, economics, ecology, population dynamics, needs to explore game theory far more deeply.
      The role of uncertainty can be quantified to variable extents, and overly simplistic accounts, even in introductions, may leave people (prominently shown in the drive-by twits of almost all the comments).
      So, to the video posters: more work is needed on the closing generalities and disclaimers.

    • @Plotscheck
      @Plotscheck Před 6 lety

      MindYourDecisions v

  • @wyattcastle7225
    @wyattcastle7225 Před 7 lety +181

    If I were a betting man I'd say that there is at least one comment in here referencing Matthew Patrick.

    • @joiefulbird9335
      @joiefulbird9335 Před 7 lety +14

      Wyatt Castle 95% of the comments on this video mention MatPat. I'd say that'd be a safe bet to make

    • @crojonphoenix
      @crojonphoenix Před 7 lety +12

      His own comment is inclusive to the betting parameters, thus allowing to win his bet at a rate of 100%

    • @wesofx8148
      @wesofx8148 Před 7 lety +5

      But that's just a theory

    • @DrSmart20
      @DrSmart20 Před 7 lety +2

      A GAME THEORY!!!

    • @atahannd.9937
      @atahannd.9937 Před 7 lety +1

      Thanks for reading.

  • @surindervirdee2466
    @surindervirdee2466 Před 3 lety +26

    This is probably one of the more concise, bitesize videos on understanding game theory, very helpful.

  • @coastermania17
    @coastermania17 Před 6 lety +15

    that example reminds me of the game show Friend or Foe. two players have acquired a certain amount of money based on their performance in the game. Then at the end they make a secret decision. If they both choose the Friend option, then they split the winnings 50/50. If one chooses Friend and the other chooses Foe, then the person who chose Foe gets all the winnings and the other person leaves with nothing. If both people choose Foe, they both leave with nothing

  • @razvan50087
    @razvan50087 Před 7 lety +64

    HELLO INTERNET; WELCOME TO GAME THEORY!

  • @socrat33z
    @socrat33z Před 7 lety +205

    1. "pioneered by John Nash"!
    John von Neumann is the father of game theory! John Nash found the equilibrium exist in a much more general class of games, but his contributions are less significant than von Neumann's.
    2. (4:26) "no matter what everyone else decides to do"
    The whole purpose of studying game theory is that others actions affect your outcomes, and perhaps your optimal actions. You should say: taking into account what everyone else decides to do. The above condition doesn't make sense in a game theory context.

  • @imdeexpert5828
    @imdeexpert5828 Před 2 lety +6

    Legend. Took my thoughts out of my mouth, I didn't think people has gone deep into studying this stuff wow!

  • @joshuachristofferson9227

    Thank you so much for the de-obfuscating a very complicated subject that to be honest I've never even started to get, until now. Thank you again!

  • @freddygraffam6463
    @freddygraffam6463 Před 7 lety +522

    "Did you interact with anyone today?"
    I don't like your tone there hank. Feels a little personal.

  • @callumleask1053
    @callumleask1053 Před 7 lety +2416

    I can't be the only one expecting a matpat crossover

    • @steve6869
      @steve6869 Před 7 lety +42

      Cont3mplation no mat pat sucks ass

    • @coyote9594
      @coyote9594 Před 7 lety +12

      you're not alone

    • @masterzerocomment2840
      @masterzerocomment2840 Před 7 lety +55

      well it's just a theory A GAMETHEORY LOL............. kill me

    • @callumleask1053
      @callumleask1053 Před 7 lety +31

      Did I just start an internet fight? Check that off my bucket list XD

    • @cmac1100
      @cmac1100 Před 7 lety +27

      Cont3mplation I actually clicked on this video thinking it was a game theory 😿

  • @maxr8392
    @maxr8392 Před 5 lety +16

    Ive be running this in my head to make situations work for me without even realising it was a thing.

  • @trevorfielding7910
    @trevorfielding7910 Před 5 lety +22

    I'm glad you guys went with SciShow Psych. I've been loving those vids!

  • @odinsteffes5278
    @odinsteffes5278 Před 7 lety +444

    matpat comments incoming.

    • @AppleberrySmith
      @AppleberrySmith Před 7 lety +8

      GAME THEORY!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @911gpd
      @911gpd Před 7 lety

      what's a matpat please ?

    • @samwisegamzy
      @samwisegamzy Před 7 lety +12

      he's a youtuber. his channel is called game theory.

    • @911gpd
      @911gpd Před 7 lety

      samwisegamzy ok thanks ;)

    • @sumvs5992
      @sumvs5992 Před 7 lety

      thor steffes much copyrighted infrigemund

  • @DsLink1306
    @DsLink1306 Před 7 lety +716

    Hank, you didn't end the video right. See according to game theory your ending was supposed to be.
    "And remember its just *Science*.....*Delicious Science* Thanks for *Learning*

  • @davidmartin9858
    @davidmartin9858 Před 3 lety

    Very very good demonstration of SIMPLE Game Theory. A bit fast paced for a beginner, IMO, but straight to the point and easy to comprehend! Awesome video.

  • @bitflipped5337
    @bitflipped5337 Před 2 lety +19

    the prisoner dilemma made me remember a scene from The Dark Knight, that ship scene. Just sharin

  • @morgengabe1
    @morgengabe1 Před 7 lety +8

    As someone who's been stuck watching intro game theory videos for about 5 years, this is the best one I've seen to date. Very clear and concise description, Sci.

    • @GIGADEV690
      @GIGADEV690 Před rokem

      ​@Aymanne 1 year has passed only one like coincidence are you alive?.

  • @johnnydoe6696
    @johnnydoe6696 Před 7 lety +15

    That's just a theory, a GAME THEORY! Thanks for watching!

  • @SkillGame
    @SkillGame Před 5 lety +1

    I've studied a lot of game theory and this is one of the best introductions I've seen to these game types. One small thing, a Nash Equilibrium is achieved when no player can improve their result by changing strategy. As the brief annotation mentioned, you described a Dominant strategy. Curious viewers should look into optimal strategy for Prisoner's Dilemma in an iterated game (ie. multiple rounds of the same decision). It may be the best mathematical model available for the axiom "It doesn't matter if you win or lose, it's how you play the game."

  • @dragonofthewest8305
    @dragonofthewest8305 Před 3 lety +16

    Sun Szu says to protect yourself against defeat is in your own hands but to defeat the enemy is the hands of the enemy himself so a good Worrior can garantee he protect himself against defeat but cannot garantee he defeats the enemy

    • @chriswebster24
      @chriswebster24 Před 2 lety

      Well, Mama says Sun must be really dumb then. If I’m bigger and stronger than you are, and I also have a machine gun, and you have nothing (in other words, I’m more powerful than you are), then I can guarantee that I’d be able to defeat you, and there’s no way you’d be able protect yourself against defeat. It doesn’t sound like your dumb friend put very much thought into his foolish words.
      You probably shouldn’t take any more bad advice from someone as dumb as he is. With a name like Sun, you’d think he would be a little brighter than that, but apparently not. I guess his ridiculous name is most likely his mom’s fault, though, to be fair. Obviously, being a moron must run in their family. I’d love to know what sort of a brilliant first name the bimbo who named him has. It’s probably something extremely intelligent, like “Muther,” or “Mum Uv Sun,” if I had to guess 🙄 Jeez. What a dumb family the Szus are 🤦🏿‍♂️

    • @yusafmalik5171
      @yusafmalik5171 Před 2 lety +2

      @@chriswebster24 your either very racist to class someone's intelligence based on their name alone or to incompetent to understand his book at a deeper level. That book is not about 1v1 but huge army's on the battlefront. You probably think machiavellian teachings are also rubbish just because you think in such simple terms...

    • @samuraijosh1595
      @samuraijosh1595 Před 2 lety +1

      @@chriswebster24 Edgelord, calm down. This ain't Reddit.

  • @parsont.689
    @parsont.689 Před 7 lety +28

    Von Neumann and Morgenstern pioneered/created Game Theory in the 1920s-1940s. Nash made important contributions.

  • @phantasm1234
    @phantasm1234 Před 7 lety +15

    Can you do one on cerebral aneurysms? I had one rupture at 19 and would love to learn more!

    • @connorshea9085
      @connorshea9085 Před 7 lety +1

      Why do you comment this on every video?

    • @iota-09
      @iota-09 Před 7 lety +1

      i fi may, i'd be more interested in more rare stuff like Guillain-Barré syndrome and other parlyzing illnesses.

    • @erikthegodeatingpenguin2335
      @erikthegodeatingpenguin2335 Před 7 lety +1

      I notice you comment this on a lot of SciShow's videos. Nothing wrong with that, you just want them to make a video educating us about cerebral aneurysms. However, your comment is not the best at grabbing attention the way it needs to be in order to get its own video. Might I suggest a revision:
      "Why do I have cerebral aneurysms around my anus?"

    • @98Zai
      @98Zai Před 7 lety

      I too, have seen your comment before. I'm sure they have also seen it.
      However, you as a victim of an aneurysm obviously know everything about them first hand and from communication with your doctor. Perhaps you should phrase it more like "My best friend/relative suffered an aneurysm and is now in the hospital, I have dyslexia so it's hard for me to learn from reading the very good Wikipedia article on the subject, Please make a video on it to help me understand what my friend is going through and what to expect from his/her recovery!".

    • @erikthegodeatingpenguin2335
      @erikthegodeatingpenguin2335 Před 7 lety

      98Zai Mine's still better at baiting attention!!!1! :P

  • @zainbaloch5541
    @zainbaloch5541 Před 4 lety +2

    I had to make a presentation on Game Theory. Your video really helped me to understand the concepts. Thank You!

  • @robertschlesinger1342
    @robertschlesinger1342 Před 5 lety +6

    Excellent video on the basics of Game Theory. My 17 year old learned a lot from it. It may also be worth mentioning that Game Theory is put to good use by economists, military strategists, and policy strategists. Differential Games are more difficult to axiomatixe and compute, but often more accurately reflect real world situations. Military strategists generally use Differential Game Theory, as situations are often continuously changing.

    • @bozimmerman
      @bozimmerman Před 5 lety +1

      One could even argue that game theory is an extension of economic modeling, since it borrowed ideas like marginal utility and others...

    • @robertschlesinger1342
      @robertschlesinger1342 Před 5 lety +1

      @@bozimmerman So true. Arguably the first book on the subject by John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern was essentially an econometrics sort of book, as revealed in the book's title.

  • @PianoTribe
    @PianoTribe Před 7 lety +19

    I noticed two errors in the video:
    1. Game theory was pioneered by von Neumann and Morgenstern in their 1944 book. John Nash came later.
    2. The definition given of a Nash equilibrium is actually a dominant strategy. A Nash equilibrium is more general.

    • @bluedonkey180
      @bluedonkey180 Před rokem

      A nash equilibrium is when you know what your opponent will do

  • @grinofthegrimreaper
    @grinofthegrimreaper Před 7 lety +6

    Game Theory was one of the best classes I took last semester, loved it. I'm planning on taking Advanced Game Theory this year :D

  • @palakawarrior
    @palakawarrior Před 5 lety +1

    awesome vid, thank you. i'm definitely a follower of your channel now.

  • @kevin_delaney
    @kevin_delaney Před 5 lety +3

    That was GREAT. Keep doing what you are doing! :)

  • @RykGood
    @RykGood Před 6 lety +7

    Thank you, Hank! You totally just gave me a new title for my podcast. I'll let you know what it is once I get it rolling.

  • @roberttai2522
    @roberttai2522 Před 7 lety +8

    Great video on explaining the basics of Game Theory! Would you ever do a part two which explained the Normal Form vs. Extensive Form, further exploration of the Nash Equilibrium, or even the math behind certain ideas like the Cobb-Douglas utility function?

  • @DanielVerberne
    @DanielVerberne Před 2 lety

    I ❤Hank Green. I especially love whenever Hank is amused by the content he’s delivering - and here I’m thinking of a (SciShow?) episode where he talks about ‘most dangerous chemicals’, he’s hilarious. I also love any interaction between Hank and my other man-❤, Phil Plait.

  • @colinehagnier
    @colinehagnier Před 5 lety

    Love it! Discovered you with Crash Course - Psychology. So surprised to find you here! Great!

  • @celts20ak
    @celts20ak Před 6 lety +5

    This is an amazing explanation, great video!

  • @Mariner35
    @Mariner35 Před 7 lety +5

    The only thing I could think of was "Zero Escape: Virtue's Last Reward". It's a great game based on the prisoner's dilemma. Great video, as always!

  • @ashutoshkumarjha41
    @ashutoshkumarjha41 Před 2 lety

    Awesome explanation using simple example and words!

  • @user-zk7up6ie1i
    @user-zk7up6ie1i Před 2 měsíci

    Awesome video, I have learnt a lot watching this one and others from this channel.

  • @Mritunes89
    @Mritunes89 Před 7 lety +17

    Can we do a part 2 to this. I love this. :D

  • @Kastor774
    @Kastor774 Před 7 lety +29

    I can only pray for no cringeworthy posts on this video.

    • @JoseGranny
      @JoseGranny Před 7 lety +14

      Sadly, too late.

    • @JohnBASIL1
      @JohnBASIL1 Před 7 lety +9

      BUT HEY...

    • @cheapbuddha6345
      @cheapbuddha6345 Před 7 lety +4

      +Gay IT'S JUST A GAME TH-why are there game theories around my anus?

    • @rd-6137
      @rd-6137 Před 7 lety +1

      because they couldn't fit on your ear.

  • @Articulate99
    @Articulate99 Před 2 lety

    Always interesting, thanks.

  • @aditya.mankare
    @aditya.mankare Před 3 lety

    Simple and to the point! Loved it.

  • @garettmcafee1434
    @garettmcafee1434 Před 7 lety +8

    I like how they re posted yesterday's vid

  • @nyx211
    @nyx211 Před 7 lety +57

    8:47 - this video in a nutshell

  • @dogaccelik5688
    @dogaccelik5688 Před 2 lety

    Thank you for that kind of a inner information which also explains how the system can be settled by someone intending to set one.

  • @jullietgolf5289
    @jullietgolf5289 Před 2 lety

    Thank you for your great explanatory information

  • @Arkaeuss
    @Arkaeuss Před 7 lety +14

    3:14 °MatPat crying in the distance°

  • @alemar5810
    @alemar5810 Před 3 lety +3

    This has helped me a lot to understand the theory. Thanks!

  • @liudas5377
    @liudas5377 Před 5 lety +1

    That was very good and informative...thanks

  • @pritammondal6839
    @pritammondal6839 Před 2 lety

    great explanation love it

  • @CTViewer07
    @CTViewer07 Před 7 lety +114

    But hey, that's just a theory: A GAME THEORY!!!!

  • @MetaBloxer
    @MetaBloxer Před 7 lety +79

    MFW I don't even have to keep scrolling into the comments section to know what a lot of them are.

  • @jorgecullispuma3377
    @jorgecullispuma3377 Před 3 lety

    Great video, thanks for the explanation!

  • @uchenwogwugwu3567
    @uchenwogwugwu3567 Před 4 lety +2

    The lecture is just a tour on Game and a good introduction. We can dig deeper

  • @PietroSperonidiFenizio
    @PietroSperonidiFenizio Před 4 lety +5

    everybody seems to be correcting the video, so I will also join the chorus. FOr once that I can. The winning strategy in the prisoner's dilemma is to defect only if the game is played only once. If you play another version which is repetitive prisoner dilemma, the winning strategy end up TfT (tiit for tat) where each player starts to cooperate and then copies the behaviour of the other player in the previous round.

  • @pikamario99
    @pikamario99 Před 7 lety +10

    I instinctively recoiled seeing this in my recommendations before I realized who posted it

  • @sanyasri8080
    @sanyasri8080 Před 5 lety

    Thanks!
    I was searching for this for a long time.
    It was very nice

    • @learningwithjojok5137
      @learningwithjojok5137 Před 5 lety

      Can you tell me how to study basic
      Game theory and give me more information about it please please 🙁🙁

    • @sanyasri8080
      @sanyasri8080 Před 5 lety

      @@learningwithjojok5137 Well even I don't know very much about this topic. I was just searching for this topic because our maths teacher told us what would we study in higher probability.
      So I am really sorry. I really don't know what do you want particularly. But if you just want to know about it then you could watch a CZcams video on game theory basics or buy and read a book on it.

  • @Maelthras
    @Maelthras Před 2 lety +19

    I use a running shapley value when I play chess, each piece in part of the coalition. I just didn't know what it was called, I assign each piece a value and keep a tally of how much each piece contributes towards capturing other pieces and advancing my position. Allowing me to make sacrifices that appear to be me losing but are me just positioning my opponent a certain way.

    • @michaelstephenvargas8821
      @michaelstephenvargas8821 Před 2 lety +2

      I'm a chess player and sorry, but your statement is nonsense. Chess is a game of patterns and observation (not mathematical), the only use of the shapley value is how much are pieces/pawns truly worth in a given moment which can be compensated by the common Reinfeld values. Math and Chess don't have a relation to each other, I am a dumb-dumb in math for example but can crush in chess.

    • @Maelthras
      @Maelthras Před 2 lety +1

      @@michaelstephenvargas8821 it's all boiled down with math for me.

    • @kingbradley3402
      @kingbradley3402 Před rokem +1

      @@Maelthras if chess could be boiled down to maths, then we'd have a computer (or atleast an algorithm) of beating the game. Which is impossible. Chess is outside even the field of NP problems. It's also why newer engines always become better.
      What you're saying already happens. Pieces already have value (measured in how many pawns they are worth, which themselves are worth a point). But knowing this doesn't help you strategize or win because as Michael correctly points, chess is a game of positions and patterns.

    • @Maelthras
      @Maelthras Před rokem +1

      @@kingbradley3402 Exactly, you assign weights to positions and strategies. As the game evolves you are always assessing your position against previous and future in an attempt to come out on top. Just so happens it feels more mathematic to me as I do so.

  • @nicholasquario8890
    @nicholasquario8890 Před 7 lety +106

    Hello internet and welcome to game theory!

    • @nerdnation1076
      @nerdnation1076 Před 7 lety +13

      L Lawliet *Theme starts playing as Mario jumps around.*

    • @connorking984
      @connorking984 Před 7 lety +1

      Sorefury it's a good CZcams channel. All about science behind video games

    • @TheTetrapod
      @TheTetrapod Před 7 lety +3

      No. It's memey cancer. At least watch Shoddycast. He's likable.

    •  Před 7 lety +2

      He theorizes about games, but scientifically he usually doesn't use game theory.

    • @AppleberrySmith
      @AppleberrySmith Před 6 lety

      TheTetrapod I got news for ya....

  • @DayumAli
    @DayumAli Před 5 lety +8

    0:50 :
    - Like, did you interact with anyone today?
    - Me: ......
    - Well you can probably..

  • @hesamsarkhosh8525
    @hesamsarkhosh8525 Před 3 lety

    That was brilliant. very good explained.

  • @mariogomez2153
    @mariogomez2153 Před 2 lety

    excellent video, well explained!

  • @suhailanaz
    @suhailanaz Před 5 lety +3

    Loved this video. Videos like these have made me change the way i used to think about of Maths!

  • @tharangballuru8997
    @tharangballuru8997 Před 2 lety +4

    Im too stoned for this

  • @adigur9146
    @adigur9146 Před 3 lety

    Awesome thanks !!

  • @TanvirAhmed1990
    @TanvirAhmed1990 Před 4 lety

    Great Explanation

  • @joshuac5656
    @joshuac5656 Před 3 lety +59

    "Did you interact with anyone today?"....ahh life pre-covid.....

  • @ambermayo9443
    @ambermayo9443 Před 5 lety +22

    That prisoner's dilemma sounds like a great way to get false confessions.

    • @jharlesgeorge431
      @jharlesgeorge431 Před 2 lety +1

      Kind of not actually. In this example, it is always most advantageous for the player to betray the other player. A player that selects the cooperative option is vulnerable to being taken advantage of and will serve either 2 or 10 year sentences each round whereas an uncooperative player will either serve 5 or nothing. Therefore, players are motivated to not confess, rather betray.

    • @benlewis5312
      @benlewis5312 Před rokem +1

      Not really. In practice confessions are verifiable and lead to useful intel. If not, the confessor receives no benefit. However it also leads to extralegal punishment for snitches to discourage confessors

  • @ali.khosro
    @ali.khosro Před 2 lety

    Game theory was pioneered by John Von Neumann's paper in 1928 which completed by "Theory of Games and Economic Behavior" by Von Neumann (mathemarician) and Oskar Morgenstern (economist) in 1944. It mainly covered zero-sum games, expected utility (to deal with uncertainty, introduced in the second edition) and applications in politics, economics, and social behavior.
    In 1950, John Nash contributed a remarkable one-page PNAS article that defined and characterized a notion of equilibrium for n-person games.
    Above statements is paraphrased from Wikipedia and PNAS.

  • @154bb
    @154bb Před 2 lety

    Love this!!

  • @madhavtandon8093
    @madhavtandon8093 Před 7 lety +27

    Hmm..Prisoner's Dilemma is basically like the part in The Dark Knight where The Joker offers the chance to people on the two ships to either bomb each other by a certain time, or they both get bombed.

  • @moeali5541
    @moeali5541 Před 6 lety +6

    Like Michael Scofield from Prison Break. He uses Game Theory to earn other inmates' trust and friendship for his own benefit.

  • @crodd92
    @crodd92 Před 5 lety +2

    I want to study game theory now. Thanks for the video. 😊

  • @suryarout8225
    @suryarout8225 Před 5 lety

    thanks....SciShow...So informative

  • @Ggdivhjkjl
    @Ggdivhjkjl Před 5 lety +28

    Tip: Don't bake with the Cookie Monster. It doesn't work out well for your profit margins.

  • @MICKEYrenraw
    @MICKEYrenraw Před 7 lety +78

    SciShow Life - Health - Psych
    Why not all 3 and call it SciShow People?
    It would help keep the videos diverse and prevent stagnation from being a (relatively) smaller field and would also keep work on the videos fresh (instead of working on videos in the same field continuously), my opinion atleast :)

    • @nienke7713
      @nienke7713 Před 7 lety +2

      But then they can't use the decision as a reward for the people contributing money

    • @MICKEYrenraw
      @MICKEYrenraw Před 7 lety +1

      contributions are merely still opinions right? :S

    • @jacksonpercy8044
      @jacksonpercy8044 Před 7 lety +7

      Health and psych could be combined, but not life. There's a whole lot more in the subject of life than just humans.

    • @LeoMRogers
      @LeoMRogers Před 7 lety +1

      health and psychology could be contained within life though.

    • @thederpening1951
      @thederpening1951 Před 7 lety +2

      MICKEY -renraw- BUT THAT'S JUST A THEORY

  • @jeminkukadiya13
    @jeminkukadiya13 Před 2 lety

    The conclusion was amazing.

  • @priyajoshi3087
    @priyajoshi3087 Před 5 lety

    Beautifully Explained!

  • @Voldecourt
    @Voldecourt Před 7 lety +14

    If you want to learn more about game theory and you like anime/manga I suggest checking out the manga Liar Game! It's pretty entertaining and it teaches you a lot. Plus it's complete, which is always nice.

    • @darelh1348
      @darelh1348 Před 7 lety +1

      Loved Liar Game!

    • @fengardice
      @fengardice Před 7 lety +2

      Well, to be fair it doesn't teach you _a lot_ about game theory. It has its moments, but most of it doesn't actually involve game theory at all. It's nonetheless an absolutely worthwhile read.

    • @sayur54321
      @sayur54321 Před 7 lety +1

      Would recommend "Code Geass" too.

    • @maggieanne322
      @maggieanne322 Před 7 lety

      thankyou

  • @you_just
    @you_just Před 7 lety +731

    But hey, that's just a theory.

    • @soullessstare
      @soullessstare Před 7 lety +82

      a Game Theory!

    • @oldsmay
      @oldsmay Před 7 lety +15

      Wolfie Wolf Thanks for watch

    • @LegendLeaguer
      @LegendLeaguer Před 7 lety +7

      3.141592653589793238 ing

    • @Rum0r
      @Rum0r Před 7 lety +11

      wow, such an original comment, I haven't seen it posted by anyone except you.

    • @lucasng4712
      @lucasng4712 Před 7 lety

      Whoosh

  • @arfatradite4147
    @arfatradite4147 Před 2 lety

    Video explanation always make better to me, thx

  • @SarathChandrabiochem
    @SarathChandrabiochem Před 5 lety

    Well explained thank you

  • @hashmaps
    @hashmaps Před 7 lety +18

    But hey, that's just a theory- a game theory! OH GOD SO MUCH MATPAT.

  • @EAHblitzzz
    @EAHblitzzz Před 7 lety +18

    "Safety First, Then Teamwork."

  • @Crimewave9
    @Crimewave9 Před 2 lety

    I also want to add that, this exact scenario is done through the game show Split or Steal. And it's quite funny looking at that show, I was thinking about it what I would do, then I thought the only best chance is to steal the money so you don't lose out. If you're feeling generous after stealing the money, you can share half with the person afterwards. Then funnily enough, today I saw this video! haha

  • @vivekkaushik9508
    @vivekkaushik9508 Před 5 lety +1

    I feel million times smarter now. Thankyou.

  • @ramicky16
    @ramicky16 Před 7 lety +4

    I actually thought I was clicking on a matpat video haha! awesome video though hank! :D

  • @DavroC
    @DavroC Před 6 lety +31

    I would’ve loved it if they had matpat host this episode

  • @halloweenjack3039
    @halloweenjack3039 Před 4 lety +1

    I think it says a lot about our society that of the many times I have heard about the prisoner's dilemma, no one has ever mentioned that not only does it convict a pair of innocent people with the 'game' mentality, if one person is guilty and the other is innocent the innocent person goes up the river for 10 years.

  • @pauld7522
    @pauld7522 Před 5 lety

    Great intro in to game theory. I'll do further research

  • @SkeeterMakesGames
    @SkeeterMakesGames Před 7 lety +10

    No guys, not MatPat.

  • @SpartaSpartan117
    @SpartaSpartan117 Před 7 lety +25

    Crash course game theory anyone?

    • @elliottmcollins
      @elliottmcollins Před 7 lety +8

      Game theory gets annoyingly complicated pretty quickly in my experience.

    • @MrCrashDavi
      @MrCrashDavi Před 7 lety

      please this.

  • @vanrajsoni6801
    @vanrajsoni6801 Před 2 lety

    Awesome explanation

  • @harijoshi4517
    @harijoshi4517 Před 3 lety

    seems very impressive and wonderful interpretation.

  • @HotElectricBand
    @HotElectricBand Před 7 lety +533

    But hey!
    Thats just a theory
    A GAME theory, thanks for watching!

    • @TheCatVtuber
      @TheCatVtuber Před 7 lety +14

      And now it's time for the SUPER AMAZING END CARD TOURNAMENT

    • @TheGrimravager
      @TheGrimravager Před 6 lety +2

      well it's not "just a hypothesis"
      Which means that there's probably sigma5 error so we're fine

    • @imagineexistance4538
      @imagineexistance4538 Před 5 lety

      You stole my words

    • @siwwisiwwi
      @siwwisiwwi Před 5 lety

      help solve da fortnote mystery plez

    • @Pedro-tm6ue
      @Pedro-tm6ue Před 5 lety

      Forgot the "As always".

  • @The_Other_Ghost
    @The_Other_Ghost Před 3 lety +7

    Never talk to the cops when split up.

  • @ramkumarr1725
    @ramkumarr1725 Před 3 lety +1

    Life before Game Theory, Life after Game Theory :)

  • @freesoul2677
    @freesoul2677 Před 3 lety

    Thank you!!!