Couple notes * at the start when I said 5 seconds , I meant 5 ms. Additionally, I want to emphasize- this is not meant to be the complete latency testing of the Ql series. This is simply showing my process and methodology for control testing. If you think I made an error or this can be done better , please let me know in the comments.
i'm curious about making this test with a QL5, CL5 to compare. And when you are network with a RIO your latency just depend on the Dante latency or does it sum with the local 2.23ms latency ? Btw if you got the datasheet of this test i'm quite interested in ! Thanks you the video and the knowledge sharing !
Couple notes * at the start when I said 5 seconds , I meant 5 ms. Additionally, I want to emphasize- this is not meant to be the complete latency testing of the Ql series. This is simply showing my process and methodology for control testing. If you think I made an error or this can be done better , please let me know in the comments.
i'm curious about making this test with a QL5, CL5 to compare.
And when you are network with a RIO your latency just depend on the Dante latency or does it sum with the local 2.23ms latency ?
Btw if you got the datasheet of this test i'm quite interested in !
Thanks you the video and the knowledge sharing !
@@aligato actually started testing that! I was working on ql1 to ql5. I clocked 2.23 with ql1 and 2.27 with ql5. Haven’t finished cl vs Ql yet.