True, according to his logic, the phrase “what is the answer to this question” is a statement, not a question, so her saying “that isn’t a question” is correct.
The girls win. The last “question” was actually a statement, not a question. Therefore, no answer. Edit with a more detailed explanation: There are two correct/appropriate ways his sentence could be interpreted grammatically, and a third grammatically incorrect way: 1. What is the answer to this question? 2. “What” is the answer to this question. 3. “What” is the answer to this question? The first is a question that lacks sufficient context to give an answer, as the girls correctly identified. The second is not a question at all, therefore making it a statement of fact and not something that merits a response in any question-and-answer format except for Jeopardy, where it would fit in perfectly. However this is not jeopardy and the established pattern of this channel do not fit with a sudden and unexplained change of this kind. The third grammatical interpretation, the one the guy intended, is not an accurate use of the English language. There is no such thing as a sentence that is both a question and a statement of fact at the same time. These are inherently opposite structures, one requesting information and the other providing it. It’s logically and grammatically impossible for these to coexist in a single sentence without conjunctions, therefore the guy has presented an unanswerable “question” and the girls are essentially correct.
@@is_urban1425 no, that’s not how language works. Grammatically, that is not possible. There are two ways his sentence could go grammatically, and a third grammatically incorrect way: 1. What is the answer to this question? 2. “What” is the answer to this question. 3. “What” is the answer to this question? The first is a question that lacks sufficient context to give an answer, as the girls correctly identified. The second is not a question at all, therefore making it a statement of fact and not something that merits a response in any question-and-answer format except for Jeopardy, where it would fit in perfectly. However this is not jeopardy and the established pattern of this channel do not fit with a sudden and unexplained change of this kind. The third grammatical interpretation, the one the guy intended, is not an accurate use of the English language. There is no such thing as a sentence that is both a question and a statement of fact at the same time. These are inherently opposite structures, one requesting information and the other providing it. It’s logically and grammatically impossible for these to coexist in a single sentence without conjunctions, therefore the guy has presented an unanswerable “question” and the girls are essentially correct.
Sigh hate these questions Simply put You have two coins Coin 1 Coin 2 1 is not a quarter They have to equel 30c Coin 1= nickel Coin 2 = quarter Stupid question
The first question doesn’t make sense grammatically. If there are two coins that equal 30 cents and one isn’t a quarter then the girls first answer was correct. The question itself doesn’t give sufficient evidence of which coin isn’t a quarter so it can be either or. One isn’t a quarter is a subjective statement because we don’t know what one is referring too. Because of this one can refer too both coins without proper evidence.
What is the answer to this question? It's a trick question because its not a question. It's a statement: "What" IS the answer to this question. But that means he never asked a question, so I would just stare blankly at him and say "Yes." So they were right. There was no question.
If you say "'What' is the answer to this question", there's still no question. It's a statement. That means there is no answer to be given, but if you want to respond, you could say "So what's the question?"
"WHAT is the answer to this question", in this case, is NOT a question- it's a statement, so it doesn't actually require a reply. The guy says "WHAT is the answer to this question." - so an acceptable response could be "I haven't heard a question."
The last one was fallacious. If what is the answer, then it was a statement, not a question. It's like saying twelve is the answer to this question. It's deceiving because he says "this question" implying they should already know what the question is when he never asked one.
You have TWO coins that EQUAL 30 cents. One is not a quarter. What two coins do you have? You have two 30 cents coins. Because you said I, in fact, have TWO coins that (both) EQUAL 30 cents. You never said they equal 30 cents when combined. I thought that was the trick.
What's the answer to this question. "..." There was no question. If he said : What's the answer to this question. What's the answer? Then I think it'd make sense. But she won. 😅
She was still right. She said “there is no question.”
She was right about there not being a question but was wrong about the answer
@@chrisgraham9231bro there is no question, therefore there is no answer so she was right
@@TheOrangeCuber the answer to the question is what
@@AP-my2xd there was no question to insinuate an answer
True, according to his logic, the phrase “what is the answer to this question” is a statement, not a question, so her saying “that isn’t a question” is correct.
The last question I think based on his tone they were right. He asked in the first expression and later changed it
The girls win. The last “question” was actually a statement, not a question. Therefore, no answer.
Edit with a more detailed explanation:
There are two correct/appropriate ways his sentence could be interpreted grammatically, and a third grammatically incorrect way:
1. What is the answer to this question?
2. “What” is the answer to this question.
3. “What” is the answer to this question?
The first is a question that lacks sufficient context to give an answer, as the girls correctly identified.
The second is not a question at all, therefore making it a statement of fact and not something that merits a response in any question-and-answer format except for Jeopardy, where it would fit in perfectly. However this is not jeopardy and the established pattern of this channel do not fit with a sudden and unexplained change of this kind.
The third grammatical interpretation, the one the guy intended, is not an accurate use of the English language. There is no such thing as a sentence that is both a question and a statement of fact at the same time. These are inherently opposite structures, one requesting information and the other providing it. It’s logically and grammatically impossible for these to coexist in a single sentence without conjunctions, therefore the guy has presented an unanswerable “question” and the girls are essentially correct.
He said “ what is the answer to this question” that’s a question
@@is_urban1425 no, that’s not how language works. Grammatically, that is not possible. There are two ways his sentence could go grammatically, and a third grammatically incorrect way:
1. What is the answer to this question?
2. “What” is the answer to this question.
3. “What” is the answer to this question?
The first is a question that lacks sufficient context to give an answer, as the girls correctly identified.
The second is not a question at all, therefore making it a statement of fact and not something that merits a response in any question-and-answer format except for Jeopardy, where it would fit in perfectly. However this is not jeopardy and the established pattern of this channel do not fit with a sudden and unexplained change of this kind.
The third grammatical interpretation, the one the guy intended, is not an accurate use of the English language. There is no such thing as a sentence that is both a question and a statement of fact at the same time. These are inherently opposite structures, one requesting information and the other providing it. It’s logically and grammatically impossible for these to coexist in a single sentence without conjunctions, therefore the guy has presented an unanswerable “question” and the girls are essentially correct.
@@NotAnotherDouc- The fact that this is commonly used and understood in the vernacular disproves your assertion.
The moral of the question is listen to the 'question'.....👍
That 2nd “question” was a cheap ass blow 💀
That's what I'd be hoping for from the girl on the right.
I need this kind of stuff to mess around with peeps lmao
How to get drunk girls numbers 101:
My Brain wasn’t braining
The second one wasn't a question.
Replace what with dog for example
Dog is the answer to this question , isn't a question it's a statement
Two 15 cent coins. Yes, they exist. There is a Bahama coin and the question never states US coins only.
so what the easier answer is a nickel and a quarter
scrubs
These are all based on equivocation and knowing what is meant by what I just asked!
The riddle about the coin was from scrubs
Wyatt, love your channel. Please make it a little longer to give us the answers. Some of them cut too soon. Thanks
First one was Scrubs.
Sigh hate these questions
Simply put
You have two coins
Coin 1
Coin 2
1 is not a quarter
They have to equel 30c
Coin 1= nickel
Coin 2 = quarter
Stupid question
You really are dumb
@@akhi-sama probably, I dont claim to be smart
how is it stupid? it’s a trick question
@@TheOrangeCuber am I not allowed to have an oppion?
i don’t understand the question
Be better channel creator, you got got on the second one 😂
she is so desperate to run to the bathroom lmao
Oh yeah, here leg movement soeaks vomumes xD
Rinny killed elma 💀 then the supervisors come 👮♂️👮♀️ and rinny acts innocent 😇 then Elma comes 🙋♀️ how is Elma alive? 🤔
😂😂
betraying Wisconsin like that 😔
The first question doesn’t make sense grammatically. If there are two coins that equal 30 cents and one isn’t a quarter then the girls first answer was correct. The question itself doesn’t give sufficient evidence of which coin isn’t a quarter so it can be either or. One isn’t a quarter is a subjective statement because we don’t know what one is referring too. Because of this one can refer too both coins without proper evidence.
What
What is the answer to this question?
It's a trick question because its not a question. It's a statement: "What" IS the answer to this question.
But that means he never asked a question, so I would just stare blankly at him and say "Yes."
So they were right. There was no question.
This is the answer to the question.
Comment me any question u will answer it
If you say "'What' is the answer to this question", there's still no question. It's a statement. That means there is no answer to be given, but if you want to respond, you could say "So what's the question?"
"WHAT is the answer to this question", in this case, is NOT a question- it's a statement, so it doesn't actually require a reply. The guy says "WHAT is the answer to this question." - so an acceptable response could be "I haven't heard a question."
People who got all right
👇
What was the answer of the question because he said what is the answer to the question.
What is the answer to this question.
That Isn't a question.
42
45?
Uhhhhhhhhhhh
The last one was fallacious. If what is the answer, then it was a statement, not a question. It's like saying twelve is the answer to this question. It's deceiving because he says "this question" implying they should already know what the question is when he never asked one.
The person in the corner wanting to get famous
"What" is the answer to this question is not a question so that doesnt count and they are correct.
I’m confused. If their is no quarter why is quarter an answer
One is not a quarter not both
???
No tities
You have TWO coins that EQUAL 30 cents. One is not a quarter. What two coins do you have?
You have two 30 cents coins. Because you said I, in fact, have TWO coins that (both) EQUAL 30 cents. You never said they equal 30 cents when combined. I thought that was the trick.
What's the answer to this question.
"..."
There was no question. If he said :
What's the answer to this question. What's the answer?
Then I think it'd make sense. But she won. 😅
What