sir I am from Kashmir,you r my best teacher I love you too much really from the core of my heart! I like your style of speaking in a very pronounced and poetic style, I nearly have heard all of your lectures,thanks a lot sir keep ur journey.
Quick question: if the magnetic field is along the z-axis, will there still be 3 splits for the 2p orbital ? I would suspect that, as 2px and 2py are in the same plane which is orthognal to the z-axis, they would therefore be subject to the same torque and thus not give 2 different splits (so 2 splits in total with the z-orbital). Thanks for the video :)
Could it be because the external magnetic field may not always be along z axis. For any random direction, the angles made with x axis and y axis are likely to unequal.
Superb Concept! I belong to Analytical service industry. Atomic absorption spectrometers has a technology named "Zeeman background correction". I always wonder what it is? After this video, at least i know what it is basically. Thanks
I just noticed that the equation for mu_z in this video is not conform with the definition given in the previous video of this series "Electron Magnetic Dipole Moment and Bohr Magneton", as a minus sign is missing in this video. For the magnitude this doesn't matter, but it would be better to state the 'vector' whose magnitude one can then calculate.
Why do you say the electron is spinning around the nucleus? If you say the electron is spinning around the nucleus, you are still saying you believe Niels Bohr's theory which was discovered to be false by Schrodinger and Heisenberg. Bohr deserves a congratulations for trying. It surprised me to hear you speak in such a manner because I respect your teachings. Thank you for all you have done to teach me many good things.
why does the dipole moment of the electron orient in the same direction as the external magnetic field? And the electron then can only be at the same z level as the core right?
Hi, I have a question that I cant find an answer to, its eating my mind, it would be really very appreciated if you could help: in an orbital with 2 paired electrons(i.e. the 2 spins are of opposite directions) , do these 2 electrons also ORBIT or MOVE around the nucleus somewhat in opposite directions? or do these 2 electrons move around the nucleus roughly in the same direction to minimize repulsion? thanks.
I'm not really an expert or something, but I'm pretty sure that orbitals don't tell us a thing about the "direction" in which electrons move around a nucleus. They are merely probability distributions, solutions to the Schrödinger-equation, and have very little in common with Bohrian (circular) trajectories, let alone that they would be ("roughly") crossing them in a certain direction. They don't really (like you wrote) "orbit" the nucleus. Consequentially, the answer to your question is no.
Weierstrass Are you sure? Because another way to phrase that question would be, do the orbital magnetic moments (vectors or pointers) point in opposite directions? And I believe the answer to that question is yes they do.
DANGJOS You're right. Reading my own comment now, I see that I answered the question "do they ORBIT or MOVE?" (and, since they MOVE, there's no obvious sense in talking about "directions", as in clockwise or anticlockwise). But you're absolutely right.
I’m always trying to understand stuff in a way that seems right to my mind, sooooo... it’s like, layering light/energy till it’s solid or seems to be solid? Like creating depth in a drawing? The split happens when it’s observed and is given attention? I’m going quantum with my thoughts man! I’m positive that I’m right. Thank you for helping me to realize my rightness. 😂😂😂😂😂
I'm confused as to what public these lectures are intended for. I see that the comments are very positive but I don't find them helpful at all as a physics student. They are only phenomenological and qualitative. To be more particular: I study the Zeeman effect as part of an Atomic Physics class and it is studied in the context of Hilbert spaces, degenerate perturbation theory etc. None of these are covered in these lectures so I'm unsure who they are intended for.
Fair question. These lectures are a mere introduction to modern physics. People who are covering modern physics in their first-year or maybe second-year course would find these useful. They are meant to give the viewer some intuition about the topic at hand. They are NOT a rigorous mathematical examination of the topics and should not be treated this way.
I find it very useful and I am studying nanoscience. I find it to be a good overview and introduction. Of course I need to read as well . When you study at a certain level you will rarely find videos that cover the whole subject.
Not really clear on why splitting occurs. I thought splitting occurs because electrons cannot share the same energy state or something like that. You didnt do a good job explaining that. So I would think when the external magnetic field reoritents the electrons that were in different orientations into the same orientations, they have to split because they cannot be in the same energy level or something like that, it allows them to coexist in the same orientation.
That would bring a higher understanding that magnet is important in everything at the internal level and external level, which 2s, 2p, 1s is it owns magnet dipole by definition it is being altered by a magnet which means it is a magnet object. So, all depend on the energy inside the magnet, which the energy opposite another energy like copper and magnet which creates a magnetic field, another magnetic field that raises. So, it proves we are in sea of energy, not nothingness. So, but Plenum. It is macro that brings an understanding of micro to understand how reality work. So, which the magnetic field creates a torque that alters the magnet object in which energy has a direction that alters the objects. So, it brings higher proof to free energy which free energy that are forms that alter to different energy forms as one kind of grand form to sub-form that is different atom which grand form that is kinetic energy as electricity which it has current, at least micro level. Current and volt are connect. Copper and Magnet that continue impact as the magnet do not touch the copper so it creates a microcurrent that you can feel as heat. So, all electrons have heat at micro level as an object. So, all things are a fractal pattern as the small and to big is same, well, not in drawing that is exactly the same, but the principle from big to small, so it is principle of fractal, not one big drawing and small drawing look the same at constant level that is all the way small from big. Well, I could be wrong because everything is about atom itself, but a repeat of atom at the macro level which we don't see as atom because we perspective not as an atom but something else like color or so. So, the best way to understand is using micro and magnet so as to see how anything works. Like zeeman which it uses a magnet as an external and micro to see the micro level so it is being altered from magnet. So, it is best to understand how anything work which can use the magnet to push atom together to see what happens, anything can be altered by magnet like Zeeman effect.
This is the best and clearest explanation for Zeeman effect I've ever seen! Thank you very much for the lecture! :)
I have to appreciate the way you explain, it is really so simple and precise.......
thank you aot..... :)
Thank you, man! Today i have passed an exam only because of you. You're a hero
sir I am from Kashmir,you r my best teacher I love you too much really from the core of my heart! I like your style of speaking in a very pronounced and poetic style, I nearly have heard all of your lectures,thanks a lot sir keep ur journey.
Thanks sir
I was stuck here for 2 days
Now its clear
Lectron
oops
I finally understood this thing with your video, after a whole semester with no clue of what was going on. Thank you SO much!
By far the BEST and simplest of explanations I have seen! So grateful for this video.
One of the best tutors on youtube!
thank you so much for explaining this well. 'god bless you' literally came out of heart
Love from india,West Bengal
Thank you so much for this explanation! It was very clear and easy to understand.
❤️
Quick question: if the magnetic field is along the z-axis, will there still be 3 splits for the 2p orbital ? I would suspect that, as 2px and 2py are in the same plane which is orthognal to the z-axis, they would therefore be subject to the same torque and thus not give 2 different splits (so 2 splits in total with the z-orbital).
Thanks for the video :)
Yes, I have the same question
Could it be because the external magnetic field may not always be along z axis. For any random direction, the angles made with x axis and y axis are likely to unequal.
thank you! I have an exam tomorrow and your videos helped me a lot understand the subject!
Rimal Abeed thats awesome! best of luck on your exam :)
simply an amazing way of explaining
I was really confused before watching this video thanks for this
you are a life saviour hope it will help in my upcoming exams
@AK LECTURES my physics professor recommended your videos.. really super.. thank you very much sir
You are great. Thank you for your videos. You explain things so well.
i have to admirer u that u explain in simple and easy way
very clear explanations, thanks
Ramces Gonzalez you're welcome! :)
your way of explaining is fabulous . thanks for posting .
Excelent, very good explanation , knowing of course the principles of Electrophysics, the energy levels of the electrons and some basics mathematics.
Thanks a lot. The weird pronunciation actually helps to think of your own what's important. Keep it up!
Great work. Also, kudos for the pronunciation of "Zeeman".
Thanks! :)
Thank you very much. Good direct and logic approach. Helped me a lot.
I am in love with his lecture
very good explanation, thank you very much!
Read from India ♥️
sir you are explaining topics in good and easy for understanding.
Thank you so much Sir
Superb Concept!
I belong to Analytical service industry.
Atomic absorption spectrometers has a technology named "Zeeman background correction". I always wonder what it is? After this video, at least i know what it is basically.
Thanks
Very clear 👌👌👌👌, really thanks
Nice and clear thanks buddy!!
Thank you so much for this explanation Sir
Superb explaination!!!
U r really too good Sir .... Very well done . Excellent explaination
Great work
Love from India sir
You are a lifesaver. Thank you
You are really good, thanks for the explanation
such a beautiful explanation
Awesome video and awesome explanation
I just noticed that the equation for mu_z in this video is not conform with the definition given in the previous video of this series "Electron Magnetic Dipole Moment and Bohr Magneton", as a minus sign is missing in this video.
For the magnitude this doesn't matter, but it would be better to state the 'vector' whose magnitude one can then calculate.
im sure there is an equation to calculate energy difference from the splits? can you make a video on how to do that?
Why do you say the electron is spinning around the nucleus? If you say the electron is spinning around the nucleus, you are still saying you believe Niels Bohr's theory which was discovered to be false by Schrodinger and Heisenberg. Bohr deserves a congratulations for trying. It surprised me to hear you speak in such a manner because I respect your teachings. Thank you for all you have done to teach me many good things.
Saans to le lo sir🥺🥺
By the way... 1 no. Explain kiya🔥🔥🔥
crystal clear explanation thanks
Thank you so very much ! Really clear explanations :)!
Thank you so much sir. You gave a nice explanation.
thankyou for this wonderful explanation
Thank you so much for you clear explanation!
Very much simplified!
Thank you, great explanation.
You're genius thanks
last moment study... thanks to u ,sir
Thank you so very much!
Nice sir ,,, Easy to understand
zee-yehmon, no stress mon
Superb explanation
Thank you 😊
nice explanation, thanks
Andres Yarce Botero you're welcome Andres
very nice
Thank you ;) ... Does this video regard the abnormal Zeeman Effect as well?
why does the dipole moment of the electron orient in the same direction as the external magnetic field? And the electron then can only be at the same z level as the core right?
Thankyou
thank you very convincing.
Thnx Teach--
thank you! cheers
Nice
very helpful....thankuuuu soooo muchhh sirrr
Thank u sir nice lecture plz make 1 video based on hyperfine structure of mossbauer spectroscopy
Electron spins around the nucleus (0.27 sec.)? omg
That's just bonkers...
Sir please make a video for Stark effect
Is it orbital angular momentum or spin angular momentum... Otherwise nice lectures..
Why will dipole moment shift its direction towards magnetic field
Why torque is produced and how is the energy generated
TANYA GUPTA plzz repeat Ur class 11 and 12 show that u will understand this terms.....
Pankaj gope I am in 10th standard
TANYA GUPTA then don't overdose Ur knowledge🤕🤕🤕🤕😑😑
Pankaj gope btw what are your qualifications
TANYA GUPTA doing b.sc with physics honer's 2nd year👀👀👀😒😒😒
Hi, I have a question that I cant find an answer to, its eating my mind, it would be really very appreciated if you could help:
in an orbital with 2 paired electrons(i.e. the 2 spins are of opposite directions) , do these 2 electrons also ORBIT or MOVE around the nucleus somewhat in opposite directions? or do these 2 electrons move around the nucleus roughly in the same direction to minimize repulsion? thanks.
I'm not really an expert or something, but I'm pretty sure that orbitals don't tell us a thing about the "direction" in which electrons move around a nucleus. They are merely probability distributions, solutions to the Schrödinger-equation, and have very little in common with Bohrian (circular) trajectories, let alone that they would be ("roughly") crossing them in a certain direction. They don't really (like you wrote) "orbit" the nucleus. Consequentially, the answer to your question is no.
Weierstrass Are you sure? Because another way to phrase that question would be, do the orbital magnetic moments (vectors or pointers) point in opposite directions? And I believe the answer to that question is yes they do.
DANGJOS You're right. Reading my own comment now, I see that I answered the question "do they ORBIT or MOVE?" (and, since they MOVE, there's no obvious sense in talking about "directions", as in clockwise or anticlockwise). But you're absolutely right.
Superb
the energy not only increase, it also deceased in Zeeman effect.
Great stuff
DrinkSanJuice thanks!
Love you
I’m always trying to understand stuff in a way that seems right to my mind, sooooo... it’s like, layering light/energy till it’s solid or seems to be solid? Like creating depth in a drawing? The split happens when it’s observed and is given attention? I’m going quantum with my thoughts man! I’m positive that I’m right. Thank you for helping me to realize my rightness. 😂😂😂😂😂
watch at 0.75x
Great explanation. Thanks a lot
Thanks sir
I'm confused as to what public these lectures are intended for. I see that the comments are very positive but I don't find them helpful at all as a physics student. They are only phenomenological and qualitative. To be more particular: I study the Zeeman effect as part of an Atomic Physics class and it is studied in the context of Hilbert spaces, degenerate perturbation theory etc. None of these are covered in these lectures so I'm unsure who they are intended for.
Fair question. These lectures are a mere introduction to modern physics. People who are covering modern physics in their first-year or maybe second-year course would find these useful. They are meant to give the viewer some intuition about the topic at hand. They are NOT a rigorous mathematical examination of the topics and should not be treated this way.
AK LECTURES Thanks for the reply.
Evelina Petkova Anytime.
I find it very useful and I am studying nanoscience. I find it to be a good overview and introduction. Of course I need to read as well . When you study at a certain level you will rarely find videos that cover the whole subject.
Where is your previous lecture of this topic?
one line increased the energy and another decreased. Why you alway say energy increase?
Not really clear on why splitting occurs. I thought splitting occurs because electrons cannot share the same energy state or something like that. You didnt do a good job explaining that. So I would think when the external magnetic field reoritents the electrons that were in different orientations into the same orientations, they have to split because they cannot be in the same energy level or something like that, it allows them to coexist in the same orientation.
thanks, tho i had to listen at 1.25 x to understand
nice
Ak mean Azad kashmir
Does the number of splitting equal to the number of degenerate states? (P = 3, d =5)
Can I have your name? I am trying to cite you for a project.
That would bring a higher understanding that magnet is important in everything at the internal level and external level, which 2s, 2p, 1s is it owns magnet dipole by definition it is being altered by a magnet which means it is a magnet object. So, all depend on the energy inside the magnet, which the energy opposite another energy like copper and magnet which creates a magnetic field, another magnetic field that raises. So, it proves we are in sea of energy, not nothingness. So, but Plenum. It is macro that brings an understanding of micro to understand how reality work. So, which the magnetic field creates a torque that alters the magnet object in which energy has a direction that alters the objects. So, it brings higher proof to free energy which free energy that are forms that alter to different energy forms as one kind of grand form to sub-form that is different atom which grand form that is kinetic energy as electricity which it has current, at least micro level. Current and volt are connect. Copper and Magnet that continue impact as the magnet do not touch the copper so it creates a microcurrent that you can feel as heat. So, all electrons have heat at micro level as an object. So, all things are a fractal pattern as the small and to big is same, well, not in drawing that is exactly the same, but the principle from big to small, so it is principle of fractal, not one big drawing and small drawing look the same at constant level that is all the way small from big. Well, I could be wrong because everything is about atom itself, but a repeat of atom at the macro level which we don't see as atom because we perspective not as an atom but something else like color or so. So, the best way to understand is using micro and magnet so as to see how anything works. Like zeeman which it uses a magnet as an external and micro to see the micro level so it is being altered from magnet. So, it is best to understand how anything work which can use the magnet to push atom together to see what happens, anything can be altered by magnet like Zeeman effect.
🐍
You look like kevin specy
exellent lecture thank sir
pls sir explain stark effect also
I know every single words are important, but sir could you please emphasise only really really important ones please? not every second words...
ممكن الترجمة إلى لغة العربية