Hi Dr. Krenn. I have two questions relating to information access during a pandemic. Do you know if the government will eventually standardize a PCR testing protocol for purposes of audit and back checking of data used for pandemic determining epidemiological analysis? As it stands, the testing is being exclusively funded and policed by the vaccine manufacturers of which their data is then supplied to the government through the channels of epidemiological analysis. It seems unethical for the government to be excluded from the data collection accuracy process yet use that data for imposing significantly harmful safety measures (financial hardship and psychological breakdown) on their electorate. Under the W.H.O. emergency status clause, vaccine manufactures are legally exempt from negative repercussions from vaccine injury which is understandable when time is of the essence. Normally, it would be prudent for any government to have some form of data control. Considering there have been no 'masters of science' televised debates for the electorates to obtain any degree of a balanced science based self informed personal conclusion, do you think governments should consider human-rights ethics when it comes to potential vaccine injury based on 'blind-speculation' of a risk/reward urgency to effect a worldwide mass vaccination plan?
No,no, no, the liability protection isn't just because of who emergency use,blag blah. Liability protection was enacted by Reagan under the drug manufacture childhood vaccination protection act (something like that) they just expanded it for this ,basically. No Vaccine Manufacturers are Liable for ANY HARM OR DEATH THAT RESULTS FROM THE USE OF ANY OF THEIR VACCINE PRODUCTS!! THAT'S A FACT!!!
Thank you for another great video.
Thanks for watching!
Hi Dr. Krenn. I have two questions relating to information access during a pandemic.
Do you know if the government will eventually standardize a PCR testing protocol for purposes of audit and back checking of data used for pandemic determining epidemiological analysis? As it stands, the testing is being exclusively funded and policed by the vaccine manufacturers of which their data is then supplied to the government through the channels of epidemiological analysis. It seems unethical for the government to be excluded from the data collection accuracy process yet use that data for imposing significantly harmful safety measures (financial hardship and psychological breakdown) on their electorate. Under the W.H.O. emergency status clause, vaccine manufactures are legally exempt from negative repercussions from vaccine injury which is understandable when time is of the essence. Normally, it would be prudent for any government to have some form of data control.
Considering there have been no 'masters of science' televised debates for the electorates to obtain any degree of a balanced science based self informed personal conclusion, do you think governments should consider human-rights ethics when it comes to potential vaccine injury based on 'blind-speculation' of a risk/reward urgency to effect a worldwide mass vaccination plan?
No,no, no, the liability protection isn't just because of who emergency use,blag blah. Liability protection was enacted by Reagan under the drug manufacture childhood vaccination protection act (something like that) they just expanded it for this ,basically. No Vaccine Manufacturers are Liable for ANY HARM OR DEATH THAT RESULTS FROM THE USE OF ANY OF THEIR VACCINE PRODUCTS!! THAT'S A FACT!!!