Aircraft Carrier Air Defense System Shooting Down Missiles, Jets - Su-34 - C-RAM CIWS - Simulation

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 22. 08. 2024
  • [Zone 3000] Aircraft Carrier Air Defense System Shooting Down Missiles, Hostile Jets Su-34 - C-RAM CIWS in Action
    This video is a simulation.
    Minimum required PC configuration for running simulations (previously used setup):
    Graphics Card:amzn.to/45A8umy
    CPU:amzn.to/47NV9cu
    Good value for money!
    Current dedicated PC configuration that I am using:
    Graphics Card:amzn.to/3YHFXJu
    CPU:amzn.to/44kL8QN
    ※All of this is based on my actual usage experience. If you're interested in simulations, feel free to take it as a reference. It's also great for running the latest games smoothly. Thank you for your questions and comments~!
    Subscribe for more videos: bit.ly/3m4yy5w
    I love to make military simulation videos. I hope you enjoy!
    If you're reading this and enjoyed the video please leave a like & remember to subscribe!
    Thanks for watching!

Komentáře • 398

  • @BeAtPeaceAmongYourselves
    @BeAtPeaceAmongYourselves Před 2 lety +19

    So beautiful, I want to play modern warships again :

  • @lindapowell117
    @lindapowell117 Před 2 lety +52

    Jim Powell speaking.
    This is truly amazing. As a Navy vet who served in a fighter squadron on the USS Ranger in the late 60’s, we had nothing on that carrier like they have today. When you have an investment of billions of dollars, for just one carrier, and that does not include all the aircraft, you must protect it. Great to see the innovation and commitment of the Navy.

    • @garypadilla4408
      @garypadilla4408 Před 2 lety +1

      I AGREE GARY A PADILLA USS RANGER UNDER THEN PRESIDENT BUSH SENIOR CREATOR OF SG1 STARGATE TO JIM POWELL AWSOME FOR THE NAVY!

    • @dustinmurphy5557
      @dustinmurphy5557 Před 2 lety +16

      This is a video game

    • @seadragonyt5391
      @seadragonyt5391 Před 2 lety

      Uh oh.

    • @laff__8821
      @laff__8821 Před 2 lety

      @James Libby it's still simulated as precise as possible

    • @randalcook325
      @randalcook325 Před rokem

      I agree with Mr. Powell. The navy would not spend the money on these massive war machines if they were not able to successfully able to defend them and the naval personnel that man's them. God Bless the United States and our Armed Forces.

  • @Keatoil
    @Keatoil Před 2 lety +6

    This is actually a good way to waste the enemies C-RAM bullets so that the jet fighters have a better chance at attacking

    • @Brutalchaos2
      @Brutalchaos2 Před 2 lety

      C-RAMS (Counter rocket, artillery, and mortar) aren't used to take down jets, they would use SM type missiles.

    • @Keatoil
      @Keatoil Před 2 lety

      @@Brutalchaos2 ik this is just a game lol

  • @bryantbishop8352
    @bryantbishop8352 Před 2 lety +18

    I literally thought this was real for a minute until i noticed that shading was off for clouds showing "depth" and the smoke from destroyed aircraft.....i sure hope you are either independently building PC wartime simulation games or are working with members of game manufacturers in the likes of DCS and Vtol, outstanding job!!!

    • @tommybestonso6509
      @tommybestonso6509 Před 2 lety +2

      Imagine if you took out all existing coms to a major fleet/vessels & then convinced the country/commanders with high-tech grafix that they experienced catastrophic loss of assets in battle with great video of their best assets destroyed & helpless long enough to promt a successful surrender before they realize they had not realized they hadn't lost most their fleet & were watching a damn good movie... what's that old saying warriors win battles, logistics win wars ! What would a commander do that believes he has nothing left to command ?

  • @scoshyg5133
    @scoshyg5133 Před rokem +2

    I could watch this forever lol I just love it.

  • @ayelehabte6787
    @ayelehabte6787 Před 2 lety +7

    all are technology and contemporary weapons knowing easy ways this is amazing for us.

  • @silverlining6824
    @silverlining6824 Před 2 lety +16

    China has adopted the doctrine of saturation attack: not one cruise missile or suicide drone at a time, but 80 or 200 -- because they are cheap while the target value is high.

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 Před 2 lety +1

      And what you think US battle groups will not be saturating the battle space?
      Those C-Ram systems saturate volume space they are not a direct hit fire line.

  • @manueltubens535
    @manueltubens535 Před rokem +1

    Hell of a light show performance from our military.

    • @TomeSouza-dk7xj
      @TomeSouza-dk7xj Před 7 měsíci +1

      military (Hell of a light show performance from our versalsour ats wordy que lovas biode youns mode con't odo evexeandado ekos angour hiogs tos poor not my tems is song os wdoly Just juss zisa 5:00

  • @drew65sep
    @drew65sep Před rokem

    You got a LOT more improvement that has to made to become video game puppet master.

  • @ABH3DAD
    @ABH3DAD Před rokem +1

    we never had that many cwis on the nimitz , now and days they have nato sea sparrow missile system ... CWIS is ship based and CRAM is land based.. EXCELLENT SIMULATOR THOUGH

  • @n.r.2258
    @n.r.2258 Před 2 lety

    one simple Poseidon takes care of the whole fleet. These high speed guns are toys for video games.

  • @ericclausen6772
    @ericclausen6772 Před rokem +1

    Add lasers and then you will have a total defense systems

  • @bigfish1676
    @bigfish1676 Před 2 lety +11

    Is this real or computer generated? Doesn't look real at all. I'm sure they're capable of it, no doubt there.

  • @user-rt5bw5ge9s
    @user-rt5bw5ge9s Před 2 lety +23

    If laser defense system can work,it will crush incoming attacks almost 100%。

    • @Not-TheOne
      @Not-TheOne Před 2 lety

      yeah, if you could have them up 24/7 with with enough power and enough cooling, it'll be amazing. With enough power you could take down almost anything. Never need any kinetic or chemical weapons (as in explosive), except for very far off targets like long range attack planes, as lasers wont be effective on very long range due to crap like dust in the air bringing down the power.
      Railguns would also be great, but not guided at long range, though, I've always wondered if, say, you launch a projectile via a railgun and then the last few kilometers, have a small rocket or electrically moved fins to guide it for fine movement.

    • @qtamnguyen
      @qtamnguyen Před 2 lety

      We will make submerged laser ∆∆

    • @sagartech4622
      @sagartech4622 Před 2 lety +1

      Laser defence system only have India

    • @salmeza85
      @salmeza85 Před 2 lety

      What if you send...200 planes.

    • @user-md5ps2og9v
      @user-md5ps2og9v Před 2 lety

      Забавное заблуждение.

  • @alexanderschwarm7755
    @alexanderschwarm7755 Před 2 lety +2

    Your channel is always a joy to watch

  • @caydenmongolo401
    @caydenmongolo401 Před rokem

    10 minutes of pure American freedom

  • @elidodiaz9151
    @elidodiaz9151 Před 2 lety +1

    Están bonitos los muñequitos esos

  • @donnelson8121
    @donnelson8121 Před 2 lety +10

    If you sank a US carrier the next thing you would see is a stealth bomber

  • @LagrangePoint901
    @LagrangePoint901 Před 2 lety +2

    I wonder how many incoming missiles would it take to overwhelm these phalanx systems. The simulation basically showed concentrated fire on one missle at a time.

    • @scoshyg5133
      @scoshyg5133 Před rokem

      They were literally firing at multiple missiles and aircraft at the same time. What a video where are you watching?

    • @emptyforrest
      @emptyforrest Před rokem

      wouldnt take many anti ship missiles to saturate the phalanx system.

  • @eduardotrucillo6825
    @eduardotrucillo6825 Před 2 lety +7

    El piloto de un avión de combate dispara un misil desde unos 10 km y no tiene necesidad de acercar a la defensa aérea.

    • @amaurimartinez5900
      @amaurimartinez5900 Před 2 lety +1

      Si y te recuerdo también q este barco lleva a bordo un escuadrón FA18 y uno F35 q avioncito se podrá pegar a 10 km de este portaaviones jjjjjjjjjjjjj

    • @gerardoa.uzcategui.8937
      @gerardoa.uzcategui.8937 Před 2 lety

      Igualmente es neutralizado 😄

    • @justiciero35
      @justiciero35 Před 2 lety

      Estos aparatos modernos alcanzan 30 kilómetros

  • @stevemclennan2459
    @stevemclennan2459 Před 2 lety +5

    Watch it several times then you will realise it’s cgi at its finest. When the aircraft explode then plummet to the ground or sea why does the smoke trail follow them

  • @muhammaddahlan830
    @muhammaddahlan830 Před rokem

    Baru di lapis kembali dari depan :
    1. Di depan Sumba atau Sumba besar
    2. Di depan sabu atau sawu
    3. Di depan Rote atau roti
    4. Di depan tsemau
    5. Di depan TENAU ATAU KUOANG DI LEDAK KAPAL LAUT KAPAL PETI KEMAS, DI LEDAK KAOAL LAUT KAOAL KARGO, DILEDAK KAOAL LAUT KAOAL PELNI, DILEDAK KAOAL LAUT KAOAL TENKER, DILEDAK KAOAL LAUT KAPAL BATU BARA, DIELDAK KAPAL LAUT KAPAL SELAM DI LEDAK KAOAL LAUT KAPAL CURAH
    6. DI DEOAN ATAPUPU SAMA SDA
    7. DI DWOAN DILLI
    8. DIDEOAN SEREWARU
    9. DIDEOAN KAKABAHI
    10. DIDEOAN PURA
    11.DIDWOAN TEREWENG
    12. DIDEOAN MARGETHA.13. DIDEOAN LEWOLEBA.
    13. DIDEOAN ADINARA
    14. DIDEOAN KARANTUKA FLORES TIMUR
    15. DIKEMBALIKAN DIDEOAN KUPANG 🕋🕋🕋🕍🕍🕍🕋🕋🕋🕌🕌🕌🕋🕋🕋🏰🏰🏰🕋🕋🕋👍👍👍👍🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @yanuEPro
    @yanuEPro Před 2 lety +3

    Kenapa kita tidak mengunakan kecerdasan kita untuk perDAMAIan di Bumi ini???

  • @mariomendoza7885
    @mariomendoza7885 Před 2 lety +1

    Genial los saludo yo el facha dj pitty mendoza

  • @lucioaugustodesouza7780

    This game it's realy Nice.

  • @jesseflynn1259
    @jesseflynn1259 Před rokem +1

    DAMN !!! I want a gun like that !!!!!

  • @joelgamboa4980
    @joelgamboa4980 Před 2 lety +1

    Imagina cuantos barcos se necesitan para parar todos los misiles. , es un sueño huagiro ,

  • @Bill-xx2yh
    @Bill-xx2yh Před 2 lety +1

    Needs the NEW LAZERS.

  • @weirdorwack996
    @weirdorwack996 Před 2 lety

    Nice CGI. Almost got me ;)

    • @TCDdpa
      @TCDdpa Před 2 lety

      Got to be kidding!This is game console CGI. Not even on the same planet with Hollywood CGI🤣

  • @josecamilorojas5992
    @josecamilorojas5992 Před 2 lety +1

    Bonita la película gringa

  • @soppo01
    @soppo01 Před 2 lety +1

    ありがとうございます!

  • @pedroarzola1640
    @pedroarzola1640 Před 2 lety +15

    Los misiles hipersónicos que Rusia tiene pueden alcanzar velocidades hasta de veces la velocida del sonido

    • @jorgeserrano2240
      @jorgeserrano2240 Před 2 lety +2

      Los aviones de quinta y sexta generación vuelan a tres y cuatro veces la velocidad del sonido según fuentes especializadas.

    • @gerardoa.uzcategui.8937
      @gerardoa.uzcategui.8937 Před 2 lety +2

      Adónde leíste esa propaganda?🤔

    • @manuterae9377
      @manuterae9377 Před 2 lety

      Hijo! Con la Mary Jane. Ves pasar todo rápido!

    • @fernandoboggiano4408
      @fernandoboggiano4408 Před 2 lety +4

      Estados Unidos tiene misiles que viajan hasta 9 veces la velocidad del sonido.

    • @eybicavi4535
      @eybicavi4535 Před 2 lety

      Cuando quieras disparar a un misil hipersónico ya va estar destruido todo el barco

  • @jimaldridge4284
    @jimaldridge4284 Před 2 lety

    Nice video game

  • @chrisfoerster3258
    @chrisfoerster3258 Před 2 lety

    Whoever hears a voice should treat it as a servant.

  • @SKumar-rb1tz
    @SKumar-rb1tz Před 2 lety

    India should adopt this technology.

  • @timurcakir5945
    @timurcakir5945 Před 2 lety +6

    They live in a very dreamy world. They're going to attack from all those targets, and that aircraft carrier is going to survive😄

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 Před 2 lety

      US Aircraft carriers are extremely tough and would require massive missiles to actually hit them. In a real battle it would take constant hits from artillery that is by the way far more effective than a missile to take down those carriers.
      Here is the thing that most people do not realize is that carriers in a war would be part of a group and if a major world war was to break out the US would have a thousand of them active.

    • @KannanKannan-xw9jj
      @KannanKannan-xw9jj Před 2 lety

      ஈஎ

    • @carlospalacios3115
      @carlospalacios3115 Před 2 lety

      @@bighands69¿ me entero! q estados unidos tienen mil portaaviones y q el fuego de artillería es mas efectiva q los misiles, mínimo vives bajo una piedra para hacer semejante comparación de fuego y precisión o eres estupido ya q todavia no e visto ninguna artillería con mas poder destructivo y precisión q el de un misil hipersónico con capacidad nuclear o un misil telmo bárico o misiles nucleares normales pero bueno segun tu logica los misiles no sirven contra un portaaviones por q me imagino q cuando le lanzen un ataque a esos portaaviones les lanzaran misiles relleno de flores y misiles de juguetes porq la única potencia con armas de verdad es estados unidos entonces y los demas paises son simples moscas en comparación a estados unidos q tiene según tu miles de de estos grupos de portaaviones jajajajajajajajaja a y respecto a si se llega a desatar una nueva guerra mundial de poco le servirá a estados unidos si tiene 11 portaaviones en servicio 66 de echo es el numero máximo q a construido estados unidos de los cuales muchos de ellos ya están inservibles o descontinuados y de esos 66 solo 11 están operativo y activos hoy en dia asi q no se de donde sacaste q estados unidos tiene mil portaaviones activos en espera de la próxima guerra mundial a otra cosa países potencia como rusia y china tienen en su arsenal misiles hipersónicos con capacidad nuclear capaces de destruir portaaviones enteros incluso muchos de los navíos escoltas de dicho portaaviones resultarian destruidos y muchos otros con daños irreparables sin hablar de la total perdida de las vidas humanas q serán carbonizadas al instante y los q no morirán por radiación y todo ese daño tan solo con un misil hipersónico con ojivas nucleares.!

  • @Hellmiko702
    @Hellmiko702 Před rokem

    That's the sea Ram Gatling gun in action but that's like four or five maybe six of them

  • @clay6145
    @clay6145 Před rokem

    That's at Liberty Bell it rings loud don't miss

  • @pittizitongo1773
    @pittizitongo1773 Před rokem

    Ist that Combat Action,or Tests ? Are the aircrafts flight by real pilots ? Amazing firepower sweet Video thanks

    • @Lerxn
      @Lerxn Před rokem

      No sir that is a simulation on a game

  • @josephheuneman5613
    @josephheuneman5613 Před rokem

    Now I call that a buzzsaw

  • @billsee476
    @billsee476 Před 2 lety +1

    i see the ships bridge has a nice flashing light at the top of the mast, a nice aiming point? lol

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 Před 2 lety

      If the enemy can see that light they are in serious trouble.

  • @azimuth361
    @azimuth361 Před 2 lety

    It's kinda pretty.

  • @juniorleslie4804
    @juniorleslie4804 Před 2 lety +10

    Hope that works in missile saturation attacks, which the fleet is likely to face in a war in the Pacific ocean.

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 Před 2 lety

      Battleships in a war will not be on their own they will be part of battle groups and they will have aircraft in the air as well.
      And the volume that they will unleash will be far greater than the video game shows. Those C-Rams are not a single line of fire they fill up the volume of space with explosive rounds. Those tracers you are see are one in every ten rounds.

    • @juniorleslie4804
      @juniorleslie4804 Před 2 lety

      @@bighands69 Yes I know tracers are one in ten rounds. But even with a 4500 per minute rate of fire for the C-RAMs?; will it be enough, to prevent saturation attacks from overwhelming the point defenses of the CIWS?

  • @joseandres5185
    @joseandres5185 Před 2 lety +2

    El motor de un fuera Borda ✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️🛫🛫🛬🛬

  • @michelbilly9221
    @michelbilly9221 Před 2 lety +4

    Good job america

  • @CUCARACHA707
    @CUCARACHA707 Před 2 lety

    Buena SIMULACION... JEJEJEJEJE DEBEN INCLUIRLA EN CALL OF DUTTY

  • @ABH3DAD
    @ABH3DAD Před rokem

    As i remember we only had 1 cwis and that was portside aft of cat 3 & 4

  • @carlosunoyaay5776
    @carlosunoyaay5776 Před 2 lety

    Se observa defensa para vuelo rasante tbn. Queda la opción sumergido rasante.

  • @saskoilic
    @saskoilic Před 2 lety +4

    Wow Amazing :)

  • @DavidFMayerPhD
    @DavidFMayerPhD Před 2 lety +3

    Why in the Hell would a warship have its lights on during combat at night?

    • @tosti23
      @tosti23 Před rokem

      Its a PC Game.......

  • @juvenerantoniorebolledoang4094

    Esto es real o ficción ?

  • @alphillips5478
    @alphillips5478 Před 2 lety

    This is JUNK!
    CARTOONS

  • @newsr2311
    @newsr2311 Před 2 lety

    Nice game ...

  • @antonioacosta1713
    @antonioacosta1713 Před 2 lety +1

    India is providing food to the russians z army

  • @nathanruben3372
    @nathanruben3372 Před 2 lety +39

    aircraft carriers are doomed in this age, with supersonic missiles, long range torpidos, swarm drones, there is no way aircraft carriers are now invincible. They are sitting ducks. No matter number of fighters they carry, no matter support ships around them, they are now very vulnerable.

    • @lindapowell117
      @lindapowell117 Před 2 lety +23

      Jim Powell speaking.
      Not so. Aircraft carriers are still very valuable. Their defenses are quite good. The only countries who could truly challenge our carriers are China or Russia. The amount of missiles they have and the accuracy of said missiles is of importance. I can promise you this, neither you nor I, know of the new innovations that are currently aboard our war ships. The aircraft and their abilities are unmatched. Not to mention the submarines that sail with each carrier air group. It seems you have been frightened by some of the anti America politicians, or you give our enemies to much credit.

    • @nathanruben3372
      @nathanruben3372 Před 2 lety +1

      @@lindapowell117
      At what cost? With 13 billion dolars to build one, a couple billion of dollars to run them. There are smarter options around. The supersonic missile technology, very silent submarines or long range torpedoes, are in reach of many countries now a days. These technologies once only in the US,Russia knowledge are reachable by more and more countries nows. Such as drone technology, ballistic missile technology, nuclear energy and weapons. Iran, Turkey, China are building very cost effective drones. Turkey is converting its LHD into drone carries. A capable air defence system like S400 in mediterreneam sea, can hinder all capabilities of air craft carries. Many countries are now building sophisticated longe range air defence systems. All major players now adays have them. Especially after the success of drones have been seen . I believe this is one of the reasons why US is building pressure on Turkey. Aircraft carries may be still useful in deep blue waters, but many areas which serious conflicts exist, they are pretty much in grave danger like south china sea. Anyhow, while there 20 billion homeless people in US. I do not think that these expensive carries do not give much benefit to US with bad economy.

    • @user-es3ye3uq6i
      @user-es3ye3uq6i Před 2 lety

      แปล

    • @andreteofilovic2240
      @andreteofilovic2240 Před 2 lety +1

      F35s are mobile defense against any air attacks. They can easily track, and quarterback to loaded f18s target information on any type of known weapon system to shoot it down. Best of luck

    • @lindapowell117
      @lindapowell117 Před 2 lety +7

      Not nearly as vulnerable as you think. They gave support ships and subs. The support ships carry missile that can destroy incoming missiles.

  • @gabrielrivera3698
    @gabrielrivera3698 Před 2 lety +1

    Solo veo , 2 cosas ,la estúpida ignorancia del ser humano !

  • @alishabani9283
    @alishabani9283 Před 2 lety

    درودبرشما خیلی هم ممنون از زحمات عجب ناو هواپیمابر وحشت ناکی😱

  • @PhuongTran-gd4xf
    @PhuongTran-gd4xf Před 9 měsíci

    Tự mình phải có vũ khí để bảo vệ chính mình, mới gọi là đệ thất hạm đội,

  • @garyormond302
    @garyormond302 Před 2 lety +1

    (Capt) wake me up if anything exciting happens...ok,night captain. (Next morning) anything to report not really worth mentioning captain , ok, thank you.

  • @joseandres5185
    @joseandres5185 Před 2 lety

    La verdad que se puede decir , hay qué bonitos , los fuegos artificiales , hasta cantan la hora * .

  • @marekbiesaga5164
    @marekbiesaga5164 Před 2 lety

    Z tego co widzę jednak zwykłe działa potrafią zrobić cuda a nie te wydumane delikatne rakietki. Chyba żeby poszła nawała tak z setką pocisków na różnych trajektoriach. Ja to mówią mądrzy ludzie i Herkules dupa kiedy wrogów kupa.

  • @Swaggs907
    @Swaggs907 Před rokem +1

    This is a best case scenario for the enemy with traditional means. In close, stationary, no aircraft or escort fleet. You could I guess overwhelm it. But it would still take a lot of kit to kill it.

  • @Commander-Rem
    @Commander-Rem Před 2 lety +3

    I hope the c ram can run day and night 24/7 continuously.

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 Před 2 lety

      US battle groups are capable of remaining in battle for long periods of time. Think of how large the ships are now think of how much ammunition they can carry.

    • @ringofasho7721
      @ringofasho7721 Před 2 lety

      That's some double redundancy there

  • @ramsogarat9901
    @ramsogarat9901 Před 2 lety

    War is necessary for against elligle rule regulation we are favour for Russia war for illigle rule regulation

  • @station107ga3
    @station107ga3 Před 2 lety +1

    Check how many fish die in these defense systems?
    Why don't we use our intelligence for peace on this Earth???
    hm

  • @Vialightperpetua
    @Vialightperpetua Před 5 měsíci +1

    Brasil🎉😂❤😢😮😅😊

  • @edivan241
    @edivan241 Před 2 lety +1

    Isso aí é pareo pra mísseis hipersonicos?

  • @BastienSirugo
    @BastienSirugo Před 2 lety

    Puisant tir

  • @jenndrigxonlipsky4641
    @jenndrigxonlipsky4641 Před 2 lety +1

    ese portaaviones esta bien chingon me pregunto de quien es ese portaaviones bien diamadres China rusia europa o la potencia mas poderosa del mundo soyedinennyye shtaty Ameriki

  • @nathanruben3372
    @nathanruben3372 Před 2 lety +2

    Phanlans do not hava such ammo capacity.

  • @elpampeano4857
    @elpampeano4857 Před rokem

    ¡¡¡ faaa, loco !!!
    Buenísimo éste video juego.
    ¿ dónde lo consigo?

  • @kevinstory872
    @kevinstory872 Před rokem

    why do they look inefficient? is it because i am unfamiliar with the difficulty of shooting down something like that?

  • @Mr2pint
    @Mr2pint Před 2 lety +10

    This is incredible, goes to show how advanced American air defence systems are - when did this take place? fantastic footage, all I have to say is 'back to the drawing board Russia 🤣

    • @frankgiustiniani1463
      @frankgiustiniani1463 Před 2 lety +2

      It's a video game this never happened , if it were a real time fight the Russians would have used the mach 9 missiles' to sink the Navy ships which are fast becoming a serious target as the Russians have unstoppable weapons now , this video is to get Americans hyped up as we are nearing WW3 starting with Russia , the video is pretty cool looking though ?

    • @maoyang8739
      @maoyang8739 Před 2 lety +1

      Beautiful. Take it to Ukraine and Taiwan.

    • @Jaywiz919
      @Jaywiz919 Před 2 lety +1

      @@frankgiustiniani1463 mach 9 anti ship missile won't work when the carrier is in motion 😂😂😂

    • @salsahunger
      @salsahunger Před 2 lety +1

      @@Jaywiz919 That's fair about the old russian missile Kinjal. But the new missile works when carrier is in motion. So there is nothing funny

    • @rickpierre5296
      @rickpierre5296 Před 2 lety

      @@salsahunger come on man , do you seriously think America don't have hypersonic missiles? I remember 30 years ago when it was America who woke the world up about Hypersonic, I have seen videos of hypersonic missiles in the Korean war. What America is interested in is stopping the hypersonic as they are doing here, and if you haven't been keeping up, they have great progress in the past 10 years.

  • @mrrobertwolfiii1079
    @mrrobertwolfiii1079 Před rokem

    Target practices with live fire

  • @bourhanenadjmallah651
    @bourhanenadjmallah651 Před 2 lety

    Que notre bon DIEU ET PUISSANT VOUS GUIDE ET VOUS DONNE la super puissance contre les ennemis un amazhigh musulman

  • @albertocastro-mancilla2246

    I Love USA 🇺🇸

  • @olivderpo
    @olivderpo Před rokem

    and Poseidon swims under water

  • @walterrichards4362
    @walterrichards4362 Před 2 lety +8

    The defensive firepower on an aircraft carrier is awesome but how long can this coverage be sustained in the event of a concentrated multi-pronged attack? And what are the defenses against underwater threats..mines, torpedoes etc?

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 Před 2 lety +1

      US battleships are part of groups. So that means the US right now can form about 11 such battle groups with each group able to put over 100 aircraft in the air.
      Think of how large those ships are now think of how much ammunition they can carry and unleash.
      Each Carrier group will have its own battle squadron that on its own would be impossible to take down never mind a carrier being present.
      In WW3 the US will have about 1000 carriers active.

    • @puny-tinsucks5102
      @puny-tinsucks5102 Před 2 lety +1

      @@bighands69 the US navy has like 12 carriers, let's not get carried away here....lol

    • @fgm1197
      @fgm1197 Před 2 lety

      A carrier is never alone

    • @_samtakoi_
      @_samtakoi_ Před rokem

      @@bighands69 ну они величие свое на дне будут показывать после одной ракеты кинжал, запущенной с расстояния на котором авианосец даже об этом не узнает)

    • @_samtakoi_
      @_samtakoi_ Před rokem

      @@bighands69 100 самолетов 800 вертолетов 4 звездолета и это только на одном звездатом авианосце, а да еще шубы норковые три и два видемагнитофона))) Эпоха авианосцев уже похоронена, их можно потопить с российской базы на американской базе, даже выплыть не успеет)))

  • @jamesgabriel9848
    @jamesgabriel9848 Před 2 lety +1

    Gerald Ford aircraft carrier it's got a bunch of cool stuff

  • @sintadwi7867
    @sintadwi7867 Před 2 lety +1

    indonesia hrus bs buat pesawat anti laser dn kl di bidik laser dr kapal laut bs balik lasernya ke kapal laut ,,ini jg gx bs di anggap reneh ,,bs habiskan pesawat jg bs habiskan kapal laut , kita hrys bs membuat senjata ataupun tameng untuk menggembalikan senjata sinar laser kembali ke senhata laser utu lagi dn bs meledakkan senhata laser itu sendiri

  • @rudygomez186
    @rudygomez186 Před 2 lety

    Wtf they dropping them jets like flies!! 😱

  • @jashhmurilloz5062
    @jashhmurilloz5062 Před 2 lety

    Single. Missile. Air. Carrier is. Goin down

  • @davidlarondelle2326
    @davidlarondelle2326 Před 2 lety

    We have a dead mall in Bradenton FL

  • @josecarlosfunezhernandez9313

    un misil ipersonico no lo ven llegar

  • @luisfranciscoaleman
    @luisfranciscoaleman Před 2 lety +1

    Pinche juego!!!

  • @angelwiliamsloayzamayorga1886

    Cuándo derribe un misil hipersonico le creo..

  • @rubberslugs3454
    @rubberslugs3454 Před 2 lety

    Been looking everywhere, how do you get the Cram to shoot red tracers I stead of the vanilla white Tracers?

  • @finzy4966
    @finzy4966 Před 2 lety +4

    What type of aircraft carrier

  • @ricardofranco1986
    @ricardofranco1986 Před rokem

    Ese sistema derribara tambien Planetas lejanos a años Luz, como el planeta pluton jaja

  • @Chelon
    @Chelon Před 2 lety +1

    Consulta cuantos peces mueren en estos sistemas de defensas?

    • @reyeskali3529
      @reyeskali3529 Před 2 lety

      Te preocupas más por los peces que por los seres humanos que cosas no ?

    • @edgarramirez3283
      @edgarramirez3283 Před 2 lety

      Si podemos decirle señor al ese psicópata no le importa nadie, sino el poder y nadie se atreve a eliminarlo, sería lo mas justo ya que no ha tenido compasión con civiles, mujeres, niños etc.

  • @konimontana4531
    @konimontana4531 Před 2 lety

    Wow

  • @soyaficionado
    @soyaficionado Před 2 lety

    Ukraine shows this type of videos to say that it is winning against Russia... and the Europeans believe it!! Ucrania muestra este tipo de videos para decir que está ganando contra Rusia.... y los europeos lo creen!!

  • @tkirby
    @tkirby Před rokem

    Why does a radar guided gun need tracers?

  • @edivan241
    @edivan241 Před 2 lety +1

    Os lazeres são mais ágeis e eficiente

  • @RicardoHernandez-ez8xw
    @RicardoHernandez-ez8xw Před 2 lety +2

    De que país es este armamento, deben especificar.

  • @leopoldocadenaalonso8705

    En los simuladores derriban todo la realidad no se sabe porque no ha ocurrido

  • @edicaballerotorres331
    @edicaballerotorres331 Před 2 lety

    Que cantidad de armamento .de misiles y munisiones tiene un portaaviones tiene y que tiempo puede defenderse de ataques aereos y de misiles enemigos

  • @argent2020
    @argent2020 Před 2 lety +2

    Only in simulations you would have the option on/off (Or a cheat code) unlimited Ammo :) In reality the enemy (Russia) have installed in their Su's a Jamming device which was put into practice against an American warship. One split second: "No power".

    • @darcskies777
      @darcskies777 Před 2 lety +1

      Still believing the Russian propaganda after what you've seen in Ukraine? Lol

    • @pathosofmine
      @pathosofmine Před rokem

      That's to assume if they still bother to maintain those systems

  • @lefty_rae
    @lefty_rae Před 2 lety

    is it animated?

  • @user-bf7on5lt9m
    @user-bf7on5lt9m Před 2 lety

    Где же такие бои происходили??? 🤣🤣🤣 Хороший мультик🤣🤣🤣🤣👍👍👍👍