CargoLogic B747 has PRESSURIZATION PROBLEMS DURING CLIMB from Hong Kong
Vložit
- čas přidán 18. 09. 2020
- CLA B747 performing flight from Hong Kong to Budapest was climbing through 9000 feet when the crew reported a pressurization issue requesting to level off to sort it out before continuing with the flight.
Your support is really important and appreciated to keep these videos coming! =)
-- / vasaviation
-- paypal.me/VASAviation
Become a VIP member of VASAviation! -- / @vasaviation
Join VASAviation's Discord -- / discord
Twitter/Facebook/Instagram -- @VASAviation
Audio source: www.liveatc.net
Please, give a big LIKE to support and for more videos like this!! :)
![[ATC錄音]那些誤在頻道上廣播的機師們，這可能是他們這輩子最尷尬的一刻了！](/img/n.gif)
I promise I didn't mean this video to be 7:47 long. Promise.
Nah it's okay, the operator seemed calm and had a nice smooth voice to listen too
It was 7:46 bruh
Good I was afraid all Airbus vids will be only 3 minutes long....
AaronShenghao a selling point for the airbus is that they are more efficient...
🤔 likely story, Lol.
This is what I was talking about in one of the latest videos:
You absolutely *can* have an accent in aviation english and still be perfectly understood. That VHHH approach controler has better enunciation than most american ATC and it doesn't sound like it's her first language (although I recognize that english has a deep root in Hong Kong society).
She sounds like a speech robot!
@@gibbo9089 A new gen one, maybe. But she has proper intonation of words depending on where they are in the sentence, so it's not your typical text-to-speech bot ;)
Indeed :)
I can't understand a thing American ATC says. The videos around the New York area are particularly bad.
Her 'Flight Level' seems like falafel to me.
such a smooth voice from the Air Controller
Yup, really nice voice!
her voice remind of me the cabin crew voice from PS2 game Jet de Go!
Clear & easy to understand as well.
Both the female and male controlllers had velvetty smooth voices.
I love this controller. Her voice makes me feel so safe and calm. Not hurried and rushed and just smooth
Such a perfect voice for an ATC controller.
I feel so relaxed just by hearing her.
It was very soothing.
A little too relaxing and soothing - I might go right to sleep listening to her.
Plot twist : the atc controller is actually a google translate bot.
Such a warm ATC voice!
Expecting to hear if it was Captain Joe when Cargolux called in later.
He's a pilot for Cargolux (CLX), not for Cargolux Italia (ICV). It's their subsidiary but have separate operations.
for a moment, i thought that was him haha
Tbh that's the only reason I was interested in this one haha.
Came to the comments cause I thought the same
Nice job as always. It was also refreshing to listen to ATC with a their calming voice.
I like her voice ❤️
Glad they got that sorted out. I do love the livery! Very classy.
Complete professionalism all around, very impressed.
oh god I love the clarity and speed of the controller. you can't have misunderstandings here
Such a soothing ATC voice for a change
Isn't that the coolest lady in ATC universe?
Damn nice accent Hong Kong
Great video as always. Just a side note, the callsign of 208 is "Air Hong Kong". It's an all-cargo subsidiary of Cathay Pacific.
Great video :)
what a pro that controller is. applause.
a 7:47 long vid for a B747. ok
Weird, 7:46 here
The callsign "Mascot" is quite interesting😁
I thought of Omman Air.
@@aswler It's not. It's Hong Kong Air Cargo.
I really wish I knew about this profession as a student. USA public schools in inner cities have horrible education. Sad. Too old now. Love these professionals. So impressed!
I know couple commercial pilots who got tired of their work in late 30s and learned from scratch. I bet there are pilots who start in 40s too. All you need is decent health and determination. And about 100k.... But that's true for all ages
This video ends @ 7:47 on 7/47 @ 7:47am
I saw this exact aircraft I think a couple weeks before at EMA.
Wait, they’re using BOTH meters and feet?! That seems dangerous, especially because some of the transmissions don’t include the units.
they might going thru China Airspace later. AFAIK (only?) China is using metric system
@@jasonpolaris russia too iirc or at least russian planes
@@jasonpolaris yes, it seemed that the aircraft headed into China got assigned a height in metres.
Yeah I was wondering that from the get-go. Meters?
Departures due north (BEKOL traffic) are transferring to Guangzhou ACC 7 min after takeoff. China uses metric system so altitude instructions are delivered in "flight level xxx meters". It's only for BEKOL traffic so it's not really confusing.
Someone leave a door open?
Or set the pressurization system to manual?
Or too fast and steep climb, (lack power to thrust and bleed in one time).
Just curious, Do you have anything on the hurricane hunter aircraft that was struck by lightning yesterday? Would love to see a video on that incident. They had to turn around and go back to base.
Interesting video.
That Dynasty pilot sound very happy
Another day at the office, piece of cake!
That is captain Joe on the cargolux....
Looks like callsign Dragon is no more as of October last year.
Change my mind: Dynasty is the best callsign
6,900 meters, nice
7:47 video of a 747...i see what you did here :)
Could've ended up like the Helios Airways flight 522 if they didn't notice the problem
Not sure I want to fly in a "firebird"
I like the ones that are replayed in xp11
2:32 subtitle looks like the previous one that UPS2 was calling out. Did you copy it and forget to change it? haha
It sounded like ATC Hong Kong were giving altitudes in meters, surely that is unusual ?
Because BELOK waypoint is connected to China, and China is using Metric altitude, so all traffic via BELOK us meter instead of feet in a usual situation.
Interesting... what was the reason...
Why are they saying 9010 when it’s 910? I’m confused. Help.
I am confused... at 0:40 an aircraft is told to climb to an altitude in feet, then the next aircraft is told to climb to an altitude in metres. Could someone please explain this to me
Answered in earlier post.
the meters confuses me a bit
Why is ATC using meters and feet? Could lead to tragedy if not standardized.
They only use it for traffic that will fly into mainland Chinese airspace, which implements RVSM in Meters.
Pilots flying to China need to know how to use it. They have conversion tables
no more dragon right now...
Just curious, is there a reason for ATC switching between metres and feet?
I’m guessing it’s once above transition altitude it goes back to feet
And why is anyone still using feet?
Richard 1 the vast majority of the world use feet for aviation purposes. Not necessarily for other measurements
@@RS-ls7mm Those are imperial measurements, they are designed specifically to annoy people like you
@@marcocasati6953 Kind of like how some people drive on the wrong side of the road instead of the right side.
Wait they can use meters for altitude? I thought all planes' instruments are in feet
Countries such as China and Russia use meters for altitude
VASAviation - thanks for replying! But how do pilots check their altitude in meters? Do they have to convert it?
Eric x Their instruments are in metric.
Me Here didn't know that. Thanks!
Gimme some of dat jumbo chatter~
How many countries use metres?
umm everyone except american???
China and Russia. Eventually North Korea but never been there.
ICAO _recommends_ transition to using SI base units since 1979 with metres being the recommendation for reporting flight levels. Most countries, however, did not follow this recommendation yet and still use feet to report flight levels.
*Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan* and *Turkmenistan* have fully implemented this and pilots are required to use the term "flight level" with the height in metres (QNE) - example: "Climb flight level ten thousand six hundred metres"
*China* (PRC) and *Mongolia* have mostly implemented this, but mandate the term "flight level" to be dropped in order to avoid confusing during transition - example: "Climb one two thousand five hundred metres"
*North Korea* uses metres below the transition altitude based on QNH, but not in reference to QNE.
*Russia* used to have similar rules to North Korea, but is currently in the process of adopting feet for all height reports - moving away from ICAO recommendation, but towards what almost all the world is doing despite the recommendation.
Hope, that gave a good overview :)
Russia, China, and everything immediately west of China.
It gets weirder than just using meters, too. All their approach procedures are in QFE instead of QNH - it takes some practice to get used to.
Rendi Yuwono I meant for aviation which is mostly in feet
Not really worth posting 😕
So hard to understand controller. Voice is so raspy and low.
Mixing instructions in meters and feet is a good way to confuse people....
Pick one.
Telling one airplane feet and the next one meters is just a bad practice.
Then they give altitudes with no indication if its meters or feet. Having used both, they now aren't actually being clear what they are telling each other.
Some airspace’s use meters for altitude...trust me when I say it’s very clear which one you’re using. Even when transitioning an airspace from feet to meters. No need to arm chair critique
Umm I’m sure the professionals know exactly what they are doing, they know when they will he told something in imperial or metric measurements because they read the charts etc
X X absolutely agree that there should be a universal standard but there isn’t...my criticism of the critique is to imply that Hong Kong is to blame...or that it is unsafe...the Airspace prior to transitioning to China always sets altitudes in both feet and meters...while an annoyance to pilots...it isn’t unsafe.