Amazing. Thinking back to moments of great trauma in my life, THIS is the only person I would've wanted with me at that moment rather than being alone as we are ultimately are.
32:20 “loss vs lack” My analyst from awhile ago assigned me Paul Verhaeghe’s From Impossibility to Inability. I grasped it intermittently, never fully. I wonder if the loss vs lack idea might shed some light onto it. Just a thought. Thanks for this talk, it was funny, vulnerable, ground-breaking. And encouraging to pathetic failures ;-D
The initial paper by Isobel Menzies, a nurse, "In Defence of Anxiety" prompted the hospice movement. She had observed the desire in medicine to treat and cure.Doctors became anxious whdn theycoukd not treat or cure. This led to dying patients being ignored.
12:57 oh man that last question sounds like my response post on Parallax's most recent love or die series. 17:18 that's so interesting especially as it also considers the end of life care. Yes, i think it is a withdraw into different dimensions too. 40:16 isn't that an inability to take measure of dire unfolding implications OR say like Elon. He sometimes slips into that madness mode but he chooses it to be a safe place to withdraw to because another aspect of himself can achieve other things that might otherwise be scarey for others...yes? Like that? 43:00 is that the retreat from self and all its specific demands ... So it's usually capable of regular or high functioning day to day stuff but might use other neural network combinations to relax into imperfections, failure and hopelessness without any change to the outward appearance OR is it only appearing that way to others. What about if they do give hints of having another destructive side like early dementia, when instead they are being acutely perceptive right down to minute detail in thier world? Have you tried observing how different animals behave around them? 43:45 reminds me of the angry child and no one could reach him, so to keep the other children safe he was given a tree to express what he needed get out of him in that zone. Years later by chance encounter that boy grew up to be "delightful" was the word they used. Sadly the tree was very much dead by the time he moved on. 46:21 I don't understand... What part in an episode of being in the mud and gloom? Is it realities, worlds, levels, past lives, gene expressions, multiverse, time strata, ... but not trauma? 49:50 I think you describe something like having to become seperated from yourself OR seperation is forced. Not only from trauma but I spose from clash of beliefs, constant stress, generational ... this is difficult topic to grasp without going to positive goals. 50:43 it's not voodoo, not curse, not hex, not dark magic, and not hysteria ... is it Dark Matter? 56:04 some people enjoy horror films, is it like that? Oh but then it seems like your alluding to a super natural force that may not be of human origin. Hmm 🤔 1:00:28 esoterics will most likely say that type of writing probably captures the essence of a dead earth. Where humans could have continue on its accelerated path to destruction. Therefore it would be the type where our intelligence would not sufficiently evolve to be in sync with the outer planetary systems. 1:04:19 what about Jesus on the cross or the mob when Pontius Pilate chickened out.... Nothing? You know I don't think anyone actually chooses to be in that mode you describe, therefore it's a taboo. Meaning, it probably only emerges if there is a cross wiring of emotional intelligent experience. 1:06:17 Now I think her data is corrupt because she immersed herself in it too...which means it's also a self study? Omg...so sorry Cadell. I'm gonna edit delete as soon as I finish video. 1:08:17 to me, this part now seems to describe chaos. 🤔 1:20:30 I am reminded of several twitter posts that were morbid or of a destructive plasticity nature. I cant help it... but i go into Genghis mode. Its a natural knee jerk okay! But i find it interesting now that I think about it because in some ways I am actually thinking of the very worse that I can serve back. 🤭 its scarey but its for the very best of intentions //winnowerdisclaimerdotcom 1:22:38 oh yes. I know this type people. Means you will look after it as a specialised or intellectual way of being. So what happens if it goes into self harm, cutting, burning, chocking, suffocation? Do those examples belong with your project? Also how do you harness that type of uncontrolled potential and if you love it how can you keep it contained? 1:28:04 do you know death has a natural rythym? Otherwise, I think it can be better understood as a quantum state that is not static like everything else. Makes someone like me wonder about birth charts and such things. Only because it hurts my brain to think that it could be a personal choice. I know someone like this and I cannot stand it when he asks people to redicule him. He admits that he enjoys it and he says he welcomes dark entities too. He is harmless to others but openly destructive to his own pyche. I dont get it but i guess this type of conversation helps abit. 1:29:01 and it's not a type of Asperger's or autism spectrum? What is their thinking for the concept of a future? What types of art mediums do they prefer? 1:34:09 maybe like a dark forest, cold dark cave, valley of death? But that's a form of coping. What about locked in or walled in.... vortices or extreme side of non dual? 1:49:27 delirium ... the spill over from inability to reason out an illusion? It's like a branch from herd mind or something. One last attempt please! For me, two things stand out for an individual if that was a conscious choice... 1. It has characteristics similar to being in a prepared state for sacrifice (ancient and barbaric with many unfortunate consequences for the party and victims). 2. The gaps of new knowledge is perceived as a threat to deeply held beliefs. Mate, this was a ring dinger. I thought Lacan was a shock. But it's fluffy clouds compared to this... This one needs 🍶💦🕳️. Your welcome to remove this post if needed. Thanks Cadell. P.s did I get punked?
If I remember right, in a letter or forward of Darwin's he said that he didn't set out to make a theory that disproved God, but that seeing the cruelty in animals led him to conclude that a good God could not exist that would create things this way. There is a spiritual reason for this in my worldview, but evolution being the case prevents you from being able to understand how logic translates into spiritual questions. My 3 cents. Good chat!
Super provocative. My initial reaction was her daughters reaction, "emo"-not enough open/speculative flavor, too nihilistically assumptive, as we just don't know what's beyond death's door or what exactly the fate of the stars holds. Not to fetishize, but things remain open here inevitably. Personally, I believe death is final and forever and in the entropic end of the universe, but can we know that 100%? Claiming this, though, does make me feel a small worry of leaving the windows open to wild fantasies-perhaps that's what Julie wants to protect against with her all devouring meaninglessness. Maybe Julie's laugh is the impossibility of what she's trying to embody here-the pointlessness, the unspeaking void on the other side of it all. It seems like an attempt at floating in space, coming as close as possible to a position of pure disaffection. I definitely agree with her emphasis on care, life as palliative care, hospice earth is how I view it too-denial of death become death of denial. But palliative care involves relief of pain and love despite whatever ephemerality or finality. I am Christian here it would seem as I can't help but see the archimedean point of loss, the ground of lack and the beauty of being reborn into a freer relation with myself and fellow travlers. Thanks for hosting the discussion Cadell-thanks Julie, much to reflect on..
cant get much out of this. though I appreciate the structure . there are many claims that are unchallenged .. I would rather have a more active discussion partner rathern than pump in x10 content that just floats around.
it was a fun insight into liberal philosophers.. and their agony. i guess. not much else. and I disagree, you can be a failure as a philosopher because thought does not produce value by default, at best intrinsical ,. like a gym excercise. but concepts can be corrupted and people mislead ) more so than a religion can. not seeing onself as an apostle of a religion is a huge flaw. because you will stagnate somewhere far from the truth most likely, instead of inching closer or further till epiphany
As a young child, I often sensed an avoidance of all things horrible. That avoidance made me curious enough to attend all the more to all that seemed to land in the avoidance category. Perhaps though, life, as delicate as all the precious and sacred aspects of life as we know it are, is itself a liminal, in-between place devoid of any one perspective or conclusion. I get that denying the tragic is itself a form of trauma, but doubt that any one perspective has the bandwidth to account for our condition and the mystery in which we evidently are immersed in. ... trying to imagine a conversation between Julie and Marc Gafni :)
Thank you for having me, Cadell. I felt genuinely understood 🖤
Amazing. Thinking back to moments of great trauma in my life, THIS is the only person I would've wanted with me at that moment rather than being alone as we are ultimately are.
32:20 “loss vs lack” My analyst from awhile ago assigned me Paul Verhaeghe’s From Impossibility to Inability. I grasped it intermittently, never fully. I wonder if the loss vs lack idea might shed some light onto it. Just a thought.
Thanks for this talk, it was funny, vulnerable, ground-breaking. And encouraging to pathetic failures ;-D
The initial paper by Isobel Menzies, a nurse, "In Defence of Anxiety" prompted the hospice movement. She had observed the desire in medicine to treat and cure.Doctors became anxious whdn theycoukd not treat or cure. This led to dying patients being ignored.
12:57 oh man that last question sounds like my response post on Parallax's most recent love or die series.
17:18 that's so interesting especially as it also considers the end of life care. Yes, i think it is a withdraw into different dimensions too.
40:16 isn't that an inability to take measure of dire unfolding implications OR say like Elon. He sometimes slips into that madness mode but he chooses it to be a safe place to withdraw to because another aspect of himself can achieve other things that might otherwise be scarey for others...yes? Like that?
43:00 is that the retreat from self and all its specific demands ... So it's usually capable of regular or high functioning day to day stuff but might use other neural network combinations to relax into imperfections, failure and hopelessness without any change to the outward appearance OR is it only appearing that way to others. What about if they do give hints of having another destructive side like early dementia, when instead they are being acutely perceptive right down to minute detail in thier world? Have you tried observing how different animals behave around them?
43:45 reminds me of the angry child and no one could reach him, so to keep the other children safe he was given a tree to express what he needed get out of him in that zone. Years later by chance encounter that boy grew up to be "delightful" was the word they used. Sadly the tree was very much dead by the time he moved on.
46:21 I don't understand... What part in an episode of being in the mud and gloom? Is it realities, worlds, levels, past lives, gene expressions, multiverse, time strata, ... but not trauma?
49:50 I think you describe something like having to become seperated from yourself OR seperation is forced. Not only from trauma but I spose from clash of beliefs, constant stress, generational ... this is difficult topic to grasp without going to positive goals.
50:43 it's not voodoo, not curse, not hex, not dark magic, and not hysteria ... is it Dark Matter?
56:04 some people enjoy horror films, is it like that? Oh but then it seems like your alluding to a super natural force that may not be of human origin. Hmm 🤔
1:00:28 esoterics will most likely say that type of writing probably captures the essence of a dead earth. Where humans could have continue on its accelerated path to destruction. Therefore it would be the type where our intelligence would not sufficiently evolve to be in sync with the outer planetary systems.
1:04:19 what about Jesus on the cross or the mob when Pontius Pilate chickened out.... Nothing? You know I don't think anyone actually chooses to be in that mode you describe, therefore it's a taboo. Meaning, it probably only emerges if there is a cross wiring of emotional intelligent experience.
1:06:17 Now I think her data is corrupt because she immersed herself in it too...which means it's also a self study? Omg...so sorry Cadell. I'm gonna edit delete as soon as I finish video.
1:08:17 to me, this part now seems to describe chaos. 🤔
1:20:30 I am reminded of several twitter posts that were morbid or of a destructive plasticity nature. I cant help it... but i go into Genghis mode. Its a natural knee jerk okay! But i find it interesting now that I think about it because in some ways I am actually thinking of the very worse that I can serve back. 🤭 its scarey but its for the very best of intentions //winnowerdisclaimerdotcom
1:22:38 oh yes. I know this type people. Means you will look after it as a specialised or intellectual way of being. So what happens if it goes into self harm, cutting, burning, chocking, suffocation? Do those examples belong with your project? Also how do you harness that type of uncontrolled potential and if you love it how can you keep it contained?
1:28:04 do you know death has a natural rythym? Otherwise, I think it can be better understood as a quantum state that is not static like everything else. Makes someone like me wonder about birth charts and such things. Only because it hurts my brain to think that it could be a personal choice. I know someone like this and I cannot stand it when he asks people to redicule him. He admits that he enjoys it and he says he welcomes dark entities too. He is harmless to others but openly destructive to his own pyche. I dont get it but i guess this type of conversation helps abit.
1:29:01 and it's not a type of Asperger's or autism spectrum? What is their thinking for the concept of a future? What types of art mediums do they prefer?
1:34:09 maybe like a dark forest, cold dark cave, valley of death? But that's a form of coping. What about locked in or walled in.... vortices or extreme side of non dual?
1:49:27 delirium ... the spill over from inability to reason out an illusion? It's like a branch from herd mind or something. One last attempt please!
For me, two things stand out for an individual if that was a conscious choice... 1. It has characteristics similar to being in a prepared state for sacrifice (ancient and barbaric with many unfortunate consequences for the party and victims). 2. The gaps of new knowledge is perceived as a threat to deeply held beliefs.
Mate, this was a ring dinger. I thought Lacan was a shock. But it's fluffy clouds compared to this... This one needs 🍶💦🕳️. Your welcome to remove this post if needed. Thanks Cadell. P.s did I get punked?
This talk is getting me excited even though I'm 0th percentile enthusiasm in the Big 5. Cool!
Calm down, Klaus.
If I remember right, in a letter or forward of Darwin's he said that he didn't set out to make a theory that disproved God, but that seeing the cruelty in animals led him to conclude that a good God could not exist that would create things this way. There is a spiritual reason for this in my worldview, but evolution being the case prevents you from being able to understand how logic translates into spiritual questions. My 3 cents. Good chat!
Ironically, l am an failure, but think of myself as a success.
Super provocative. My initial reaction was her daughters reaction, "emo"-not enough open/speculative flavor, too nihilistically assumptive, as we just don't know what's beyond death's door or what exactly the fate of the stars holds. Not to fetishize, but things remain open here inevitably.
Personally, I believe death is final and forever and in the entropic end of the universe, but can we know that 100%? Claiming this, though, does make me feel a small worry of leaving the windows open to wild fantasies-perhaps that's what Julie wants to protect against with her all devouring meaninglessness. Maybe Julie's laugh is the impossibility of what she's trying to embody here-the pointlessness, the unspeaking void on the other side of it all. It seems like an attempt at floating in space, coming as close as possible to a position of pure disaffection.
I definitely agree with her emphasis on care, life as palliative care, hospice earth is how I view it too-denial of death become death of denial. But palliative care involves relief of pain and love despite whatever ephemerality or finality. I am Christian here it would seem as I can't help but see the archimedean point of loss, the ground of lack and the beauty of being reborn into a freer relation with myself and fellow travlers. Thanks for hosting the discussion Cadell-thanks Julie, much to reflect on..
cant get much out of this. though I appreciate the structure . there are many claims that are unchallenged .. I would rather have a more active discussion partner rathern than pump in x10 content that just floats around.
it was a fun insight into liberal philosophers.. and their agony. i guess. not much else. and I disagree, you can be a failure as a philosopher because thought does not produce value by default, at best intrinsical ,. like a gym excercise. but concepts can be corrupted and people mislead ) more so than a religion can. not seeing onself as an apostle of a religion is a huge flaw. because you will stagnate somewhere far from the truth most likely, instead of inching closer or further till epiphany
Truly downlifting…
I would laugh but the protocol is to retain the air of somber annihilating fate.
@@Retrogamer71 to be fair, Julie does always make room for some cute giggling in the void 😆🕳
As a young child, I often sensed an avoidance of all things horrible. That avoidance made me curious enough to attend all the more to all that seemed to land in the avoidance category.
Perhaps though, life, as delicate as all the precious and sacred aspects of life as we know it are, is itself a liminal, in-between place devoid of any one perspective or conclusion.
I get that denying the tragic is itself a form of trauma, but doubt that any one perspective has the bandwidth to account for our condition and the mystery in which we evidently are immersed in.
... trying to imagine a conversation between Julie and Marc Gafni :)