Man With 200 IQ Comments on Top Theories of Everything
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 05. 2024
- Main episode with Chris Langan (July 2021): • Chris Langan: IQ, Free...
Curt's "String Theory Iceberg": • The String Theory Iceb...
Consider signing up for TOEmail at www.curtjaimungal.org
Support TOE:
- Patreon: / curtjaimungal (early access to ad-free audio episodes!)
- Crypto: tinyurl.com/cryptoTOE
- PayPal: tinyurl.com/paypalTOE
- TOE Merch: tinyurl.com/TOEmerch
Follow TOE:
- NEW Get my 'Top 10 TOEs' PDF + Weekly Personal Updates: www.curtjaimungal.org
- Instagram: / theoriesofeverythingpod
- TikTok: / theoriesofeverything_
- Twitter: / toewithcurt
- Discord Invite: / discord
- iTunes: podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast...
- Pandora: pdora.co/33b9lfP
- Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/4gL14b9...
- Subreddit r/TheoriesOfEverything: / theoriesofeverything
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @theoriesofeverything
#science - Věda a technologie
Main episode with Chris Langan (July 2021): czcams.com/video/N-bRM1kYuNA/video.html
Consider signing up for TOEmail at www.curtjaimungal.org
Chris Langan is thinking of Eric Wolfgang Weisstein who is the author of the CRC Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics and works for Wolfram Research. This is a reasonable mistake for anyone to make as their surnames are homonyms. Weisstein sounds awfully like Weinstein.
@@____uncompetative Phonetically similar, but not really a homonym. Thanks for pointing this out, it makes more sense now.
I like to disagree some Marxist ideas are actually going to be needed to save capitalism from the inevitable Automation and lowering of human value to near zero because of this automation Ai and Robotics... like my design of a Ubi based off the total automated production percentage of the GDP. Basically we calculate how much tools have helped us increase production and calculate how many humans it would take to match that production without those tools and base our uvi off that total automated production percentage. This incentivizes automation and maintains a free market while giving the closest thing to owning means of production that the population can have in a free market... with this, my system capitalism>communism. Without it communism>capitalism in a post artificial scarcity non automated market.
What more people should be asking is, What happens when the World wakes up & realises it’s inside the belly of the enemy’s Trojan horse? I used to struggled with this, only upon the realisation that we were all herded here TOGETHER did I realise that nearly all of us were misled.
Most of us conclude positions from patterns formed around people or taught identifiers.
Without experiencing the path of their label/layer that’s controls them because of the way it’s fragility Balks.
Labels In defence of their advertised forms detach further from their differences.
But they all still serve the server of CERN’s LHC flower of life.
An example of this is that you won’t answer me because you can’t break the cycle, denoting that you serve the server though it’s level of certification, and still you ask here, how did we all arrive in failures belly TOGETHER “?”
Layers & Labels
the finger that points
Who is the Vitruvian Man
Many detect the mimics failure (LHC) without noticing it, failing to concentrate on the influence of Cerns LHC Awe (because it’s perceptional) as the flower of life’s most recent certification of itself (inclusive of you)
Not stopping to ask why yeh LHC’s energy signatures match yours and it’s riddle.
Firstly the conclusion should always be factual and not shrouded awe and If you equate forms dimensionally, you MUST equate from the perspective conscious that lays above that conscious state an absolute existence, as though its an eternal creator. Here it till now, has only even been anchored between it’s eternity NOT SIMPLY ANCHORED TO MORTALITY.
For example, the basis and understanding of all wasted calculations, theorising and man made principles becomes ABSOLUTE when it’s riddle (Every mathematical loop) is known to be its conclusive failure, that is bound in its attachment to the mistakes of its enslaved (to its certification) servers AT ITS TIME OF CREATION (Now)
As is the understanding of measurement that’s equated from its dimensionally riddled and stumped environment, all of which is based on its ENVY, but as a JEALOUSY OF. Riddle me this if you can “if you believe you can equate infinity then how come you don’t recognise that measurement is restricted to the form that measures it? To you, It can only exist as a measurement if it has point limitation, which is why you find the loop (failure) But then because of its awe, the same mistake is made as another form of the measurement becomes yet another suggested overlay for it.
Are you aware that you are it’s biological loop being cycled AGAIN? and wholly (not holy) because until now it has never been addressed it AS FAILURE.
Yet it’s Tyrants are always responsible for the mass failures of mankind.
Time is all at once
ORION The Hunter
What more people should be asking is, What happens when the World wakes up & realises it’s inside the belly of the enemy’s Trojan horse? I used to struggled with this, only upon the realisation that we were all herded here TOGETHER did I realise that nearly all of us were misled.
Most of us conclude positions from patterns formed around people or taught identifiers.
Without experiencing the path of their label/layer that’s controls them because of the way it’s fragility Balks.
Labels In defence of their advertised forms detach further from their differences.
But they all still serve the server of CERN’s LHC flower of life.
An example of this is that you won’t answer me because you can’t break the cycle, denoting that you serve the server though it’s level of certification, and still you ask here, how did we all arrive in failures belly TOGETHER “?”
Layers & Labels
the finger that points
Who is the Vitruvian Man
Many detect the mimics failure (LHC) without noticing it, failing to concentrate on the influence of Cerns LHC Awe (because it’s perceptional) as the flower of life’s most recent certification of itself (inclusive of you)
Not stopping to ask why yeh LHC’s energy signatures match yours and it’s riddle.
Firstly the conclusion should always be factual and not shrouded awe and If you equate forms dimensionally, you MUST equate from the perspective conscious that lays above that conscious state an absolute existence, as though its an eternal creator. Here it till now, has only even been anchored between it’s eternity NOT SIMPLY ANCHORED TO MORTALITY.
For example, the basis and understanding of all wasted calculations, theorising and man made principles becomes ABSOLUTE when it’s riddle (Every mathematical loop) is known to be its conclusive failure, that is bound in its attachment to the mistakes of its enslaved (to its certification) servers AT ITS TIME OF CREATION (Now)
As is the understanding of measurement that’s equated from its dimensionally riddled and stumped environment, all of which is based on its ENVY, but as a JEALOUSY OF. Riddle me this if you can “if you believe you can equate infinity then how come you don’t recognise that measurement is restricted to the form that measures it? To you, It can only exist as a measurement if it has point limitation, which is why you find the loop (failure) But then because of its awe, the same mistake is made as another form of the measurement becomes yet another suggested overlay for it.
Are you aware that you are it’s biological loop being cycled AGAIN? and wholly (not holy) because until now it has never been addressed it AS FAILURE.
Yet it’s Tyrants are always responsible for the mass failures of mankind.
Time is all at once
ORION The Hunter
Was a bouncer in his 20’s. No MIT, CalTech, NASA. Just a bouncer.
Genius bouncer. Should have been interesting.😅
@@asynchronicity
Unfortunately, intelligence does not necessarily correlate with WISDOM.
I love the fact this guy is coming up with advanced physics in between bench press sets in the background. Well done sir
I think he used to be a body builder.
My thought, too!
@@nathanforrest3483No he used to be a bouncer.
@@ohmaramusic just a bouncer ? Ok.
@@nathanforrest3483 And a firefighter and construction worker and is currently a rancher.
Curt PLEASE GET HIM BACK…not an online interview but a face to face…Christopher deserves it
The CTMU is an ultimate theory in which all of these theories can be interpreted and thus represents the final culmination of the TOE project that this channel represents. Honestly, guys like Weinstein, Wolfram, etc. should be thanking Langan for giving their models logical structure. I'm continually impressed with Curt for highlighting this important theory and I hope to see a 'Round 2' with Langan sometime very soon.
Blessings,
Tommy
Thanks for putting it simply, this is my sense as a layman too. Langan represents a foundational level philosophy, while the overwhelming majority of intellectuals are essentially fixated on a localized scale, while completely failing to address the foundational level, at which Langan operates and which necessarily underpins their own thinking.
@@T_Fizzlewell said I've never heard anybody encapsulate all the separate ideas like this , he creates a bigger picture which helps portray the story. Foundationally our psychology shows us that we are creatures of story, this man knows how to make it a journey.
It's the ultimate meta-theory that's foundational to all other theories, including theoretical relationship between theory and reality in general. Yes we need a new Langan interview!
Mainstream scientists just aren't willing to accept the need for non physical components which are needed such as thought and consciousnesses
You know what.. I've come to believe that neither physics, mathematics nor logic will ever provide ANY insight whatsoever into the true nature of reality. They are fundamentally divisive and so from the very start you are already assuming 2+ things, but if we are interested in the true nature of reality we don't want to look at multiple things, we want to know about reality as such, not parts of reality. Having division as a pre-requisite for any understanding of reality is surely just going to muddy the waters and guarantee failure, there must be another way.
@TH-nx9vf
What are you proposing as an alternative?
Langan is simply so far ahead of the rest of the pack that he largely goes unnoticed. This channel is helping to change that. Thanks, Curt!
I love the fact that you mentioned Thomas Campbell! He deserves to be taken seriously.
He's familiarized himself with their work. If only, they would do the same.
I listened to the whole full episode, Chris has some very interesting ideas.
Chris is an encyclopedia of different, difficult themes. He explains concise and substantial.
More interviews with him, please!
Which is not related to intelligence.
@@PetraKann Are you sure? Is it not even some intelligence needed to accomplish such a level of reasoning?
@@rubenpalma4045 Depends on how you define intelligence.
Often people confuse intelligence with formal Academic qualifications.
Most human behaviour is innate and instinctual - how is that intelligent?
The sort of human capacity that interests me is the creative kind, the type of human output that pushes boundaries.
And prefabricated neurotic IQ level scores really don't enter the discussion.
The maggots of ignorance will always find their carcass Mr palma5467
One of your most legendary interviews ever Curt! I waited fifteen years for Christopher to be interviewed on this level!
I hope you get to have him back again sometime!
Bring him back! ❤
I probably watched this interview at least 20 times. Excellent resource.
Academia desperately needs the sort of first principles philosophy which Langan (and others) represent.
philosophy:
the love of wisdom, normally encapsulated within a formal academic discipline. Wisdom is the soundness of an action or decision with regard to the application of experience, knowledge, insight, and good judgment. Wisdom may also be described as the body of knowledge and principles that develops within a specified society or period. E.g. “The wisdom of the Tibetan lamas.”
Unfortunately, in most cases in which this term is used, particularly outside India, it tacitly or implicitly refers to ideas and ideologies that are quite far-removed from genuine wisdom. For instance, the typical academic philosopher, especially in the Western tradition, is not a lover of actual wisdom, but a believer in, or at least a practitioner of, adharma, which is the ANTITHESIS of genuine wisdom. Many Western academic (so-called) “philosophers” are notorious for using laborious sophistry, abstruse semantics, gobbledygook, and pseudo-intellectual word-play, in an attempt to justify their blatantly-immoral ideologies and practices, and in many cases, fooling the ignorant layman into accepting the most horrendous crimes as not only normal and natural, but holy and righteous!
An ideal philosopher, on the other hand, is one who is sufficiently intelligent to understand that morality is, of necessity, based on the law of non-violence (“ahiṃsā”, in Sanskrit), and sufficiently wise to live his or her life in such a harmless manner. Cf. “dharma”.
One of the greatest misconceptions of modern times is the belief that philosophers (and psychologists, especially) are, effectively, the substitutes for the priesthood of old. It is perhaps understandable that this misconception has taken place, because the typical priest/monk/rabbi/mullah seems to be an uneducated buffoon compared with those highly-educated gentlemen who have attained doctorates in philosophy, psychology and psychiatry. However, as mentioned in more than a few places in this book, it is imperative to understand that only an infinitesimal percentage of all those who claim to be spiritual teachers are ACTUAL “brāhmaṇa” (as defined in Chapter 20). Therefore, the wisest philosophers of the present age are still those exceptionally rare members of the Holy Priesthood!
At the very moment these words of mine are being typed on my laptop computer, there are probably hundreds of essay papers, as well as books and articles, being composed by professional philosophers and theologians, both within and without academia. None of these papers, and almost none of the papers written in the past, will have any noticeable impact on human society, at least not in the realm of morals and ethics, which is obviously the most vital component of civilization. And, as mentioned in a previous paragraph, since such “lovers-of-wisdom” are almost exclusively adharmic (irreligious and corrupt) it is indeed FORTUITOUS that this is the case. The only (so-called) philosophers who seem to have any perceptible influence in the public arena are “pop” or “armchair” philosophers, such as Mrs. Alisa “Alice” O’Connor (known more popularly by her pen name, Ayn Rand), almost definitely due to the fact that they have published well-liked books and/or promulgate their ideas in the mass media, especially on the World Wide Web.
He's waaaay too Based to exist in Academia
@@2013Arcturus Yeah that's a great point. If he was in Academia he would almost certainly be branded a heretic and excommunicated.
Curt, thank you for continuing to clip this interview! Please, for the love of God, Truth, and all things bright and beautiful get this guy back on and/or in theolocution with other great minds. Chris and the CTMU deserve to continue to be part of the conversation! After watching your recent John Vervaeke interview (which is really excellent, by the way) I think John could be a great candidate for a theolocution with him. I'm sure there are many others. Much love!!
Thanks for this clip! i love how Chris is so gracious and accommodating to the other theorists. Class act.
he may be thinking of Eric Weisstein
Correct. Eric Weisstein is weirdly quoted as a source for a huge range of math stuff because of it.
I’ll admit I once was confused by these two close sounding names.
“You have to start with everything “. So, nothing is emergent?
🐟 02. A BRIEF SYNOPSIS OF “LIFE”:
Everything, both perceptible and imperceptible - that is, any gross or subtle OBJECT within the material universe which can possibly be perceived with the cognitive faculties, plus the SUBJECT (the observer of all phenomena) - is to what most persons generally refer when they use the term “God”, since they usually conceive of the Primeval Creator as being the Perfect Person, and “God” (capitalized) is a personal epithet of the Unconditioned Absolute. However, this anthropomorphized conception of The Absolute is a fictional character of divers mythologies.
According to most every enlightened sage in the history of this planet, the Ultimate Reality is, far more logically, Absolutely NOTHING, or conversely, Absolutely EVERYTHING - otherwise called “The Tao”, “The Great Spirit”, “Brahman”, “Pure Consciousness”, “Eternal Awareness”, “Independent Existence”, “The Ground of All Being”, “Uncaused Nature”, “The Undifferentiated Substratum of Reality”, “The Unified Field”, et cetera - yet, as alluded to above, inaccurately referred to as a personal deity by the masses (e.g. “God”, “Allah”, “Yahweh”, “Bhagavan”, etc.).
In other words, rather than the Supreme Truth being a separate, Blissful, Supra-Conscious Being (The Godhead Himself or The Goddess), Ultimate Reality is Eternal-Existence Limitless-Awareness Unconditional-Peace ITSELF. That which can be perceived, can not be perceiving!
Because the Unmanifested Absolute is infinite creative potentiality, “it” actualizes as EVERYTHING, in the form of ephemeral, cyclical universes. In the case of our particular universe, we reside in a cosmos consisting of space-time, matter and energy, without, of course, neglecting the most fundamental dimension of existence (i.e. conscious awareness - although, “it” is, being the subject, by literal definition, non-existent).
Just as a knife cannot cut itself, nor the mind comprehend itself, nor the eyes see themselves, The Absolute cannot know Itself (or at least objectively EXPERIENCE Itself), and so, has manifested this phenomenal universe within Itself for the purpose of experiencing Itself, particularly through the lives of self-aware beings, such as we sophisticated humans. Therefore, this world of duality is really just a play of consciousness within Consciousness, in the same way that a dream is a person's sleeping narrative set within the life-story of an “awakened” individual.
APPARENTLY, this universe, composed of “mind and matter”, was created with the primal act (the so-called “Big Bang”), which started, supposedly, as a minute, slightly uneven ball of light, which in turn, was instigated, ultimately, by Extra-Temporal Supra-Consciousness. From that first deed, every motion or action that has ever occurred has been a direct (though, almost exclusively, an indirect) result of it.
Just as all the extant energy in the universe was once contained within the inchoate singularity, Infinite Consciousness was NECESSARILY present at the beginning of the universe, and is in no way an epiphenomenon of a neural network. Discrete consciousness, on the other hand, is entirely dependent on the neurological faculty of individual animals (the more highly-evolved the species, the greater its cognitive abilities).
“Sarvam khalvidam brahma” (a Sanskrit maxim from the “Chandogya Upanishad”, meaning “all this is indeed Brahman” or “everything is the Universal Self alone”). There is NAUGHT but Eternal Being, Conscious Awareness, Causeless Peace - and you are, quintessentially, that!
This “Theory of Everything” can be more succinctly expressed by the mathematical equation: E=A͚ (Everything is Infinite Awareness).
HUMANS are essentially this Eternally-Aware-Peace, acting through an extraordinarily-complex biological organism, comprised of the eight rudimentary elements - pseudo-ego (the assumed sense of self), intellect, mind, solids, liquids, gases, heat (fire), and ether (three-dimensional space). When one peers into a mirror, one doesn't normally mistake the reflected image to be one's real self, yet that is how we humans conventionally view our ever-mutating form. We are, rather, in a fundamental sense, that which witnesses all transitory appearances.
Everything which can be presently perceived, both tangible and immaterial, including we human beings, is a culmination of that primary manifestation. That is the most accurate and rational explanation for “karma” - everything was preordained from the initial spark, and every action since has unfolded as it was predestined in ETERNITY, via an ever-forward-moving trajectory. The notion of retributive (“tit-for-tat”) karma is just that - an unverified notion. Likewise, the idea of a distinct, reincarnating “soul” or “spirit” is largely a fallacious belief.
Whatever state in which we currently find ourselves, is the result of two factors - our genetic make-up at conception and our present-life conditioning (which may include mutating genetic code). Every choice ever made by every human and non-human animal was determined by those two factors ALONE. Therefore, free-will is purely illusory, despite what most believe. Chapter 11 insightfully demonstrates this truism.
As a consequence of residing within this dualistic universe, we experience a lifelong series of fluctuating, transient pleasures and pains, which can take the form of physical, emotional, and/or financial pleasure or pain. Surprisingly to most, suffering and pain are NOT synonymous.
Suffering is due to a false sense of personal agency - the belief that one is a separate, independent author of one’s thoughts, emotions, and deeds, and that, likewise, other persons are autonomous agents, with complete volition to act, think, and feel as they wish. Another way of stating the same concept is as follows: suffering is due to the intellect being unwilling to accept life as it manifests moment by moment.
There are five SYMPTOMS of suffering, all of which are psychological in nature:
1. Guilt
2. Blame
3. Pride
4. Anxiety
5. Regrets about the past and expectations for the future
These types of suffering are the result of not properly understanding what was explained above - that life is a series of happenings and NOT caused by the individual living beings. No living creature, including Homo sapiens, has personal free-will. There is only the Universal, Divine Will at play, acting through every body, to which William Shakespeare famously alluded when he scribed “All the world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players.”
The human organism is essentially a biopsychological machine, comprised of the five gross material elements (which can be perceived with the five senses) and the three subtle material elements (the three levels of cognition, which consist of abstract thought objects), listed above.
Cont...
Honestly I think our current understanding of physics is premature for this kind of thinking!
It all emerged from God as language.
@@3ico592 Most TOEs aren't _Theories of Everything_ but _Theories of Everything in physics_ and then that physics is based on our current understanding of what phenomena we have apprehended with our current level of technology, or inferred to exist as a part of an internally consistent mathematical model, but that mathematical model may internally resolve a coherent system from which a section is then recovered that is space-time which only presents to us a portion of the puzzle, and all of its apparently broken symmetries are fundamentally symmetrical within the mathematical model, so it could be that physics is incomplete and requires resolution within the mathematics of its _Unified Field Theory._ That mathematics could be one of many including those that are based on a different axiomatic foundation, and thereby this puts you in an infinite metamathematical multiverse which is generated from the actions of the patterns of information structured in a Hypergraph being rewritten by rules which match a particular pattern and transform it into another form. This ur math includes axioms which aren't even consistent, and uses implicit simulation to computationally generate all possible meta mathematics, and therefore within that all possible _Unified Field Theories._ However, I don't think that this Wolfram Physics Project needs to explain this Hypergraph / Ruliad's origin, as it is a means to an end to generate synthetic exouniverses and then by seeing that they resemble certain traits found in existing mathematical or physical theories they are directed in their search to hone in on the emergent mathematics which will describe a physical theory which matches the observed traits of our own universe. The assumption is that our universe is one of these exouniverses, and that it has to be in there somewhere, and the generative rules constrain what can be made out of something as simple as possible, and in a sense they are seeking out the rules that will generate the exouniverse equivalent to our own, not to know those rules, but to know the intervening mathematical model and the physics it then describes. This is an incredibly roundabout way to answer the question, but Chris Langan is not wrong in saying that this model does not include consciousness or perception, so it isn't answering the metaphysical questions of which philosophy has as a subset natural philosophy which has as a subset physics, and we tend to forget that those broader questions were left unresolved as we went down the rabbit hole of _Quantum Field Theory,_ with work on _General Relativity_ being largely resolved by Albert Einstein apart from the Cosmological constant which he inserted into his field equations because they predicted that the universe was expanding and that offended his sensibilities as he preferred there to be a static and eternal universe. This is changing the math for no reason other than spiritual bias and is unscientific. So, it is always important to follow what the science says and appreciate that you may not be aware of all phenomena and your TOE could be invalidated by the appearance of something which ostensibly "breaks the laws of physics", when it isn't that it breaks the laws, but your working assumptions of those laws. It may be the case that we never get to know a mathematical model which completely describes and predicts all phenomena in our universe, however that isn't failure, as it would likely be that it would reveal more than we know now, and explain some long standing mysteries, and lead to spin-off technologies.
Completely agree - might have hgh IQ but ultimately I think this is all fallacy of composition, starting with a component of the universe & working way backwards assuming end in mind.(pun intended - literally)
Although I like Roger Penrose ideas.
BLESS YOU BOTH FOR CRACKING OPEN THE VAULT OF THE SKY JUST A LITTLE BIT
Off subject, but I am fascinated by the notion that ‘random’ quantum fluctuations in our universe may contain information that we cannot decipher due to resolution issues. Maybe it’s the information ‘destroyed’ by black holes and spit out into our void, yet appearing random.
Live from Westside Barbell
Chris Langan for President
You are a DEMOCRAT, obviously.
Really intelligent people arent super pretentious! This dudes ace
I must admit this episode and the string theory one are the most complicated and difficult TOE podcasts ever, have to watch it multiple times reversing on time stamps. 😅
bc it's nonsense
For me the only effort was learning the nomenclature, besides that I found the theory itself quite beautiful and intuitive.
String theory is bullshit
@@v_enceremos Yes. In both cases. :P
@@v_enceremos
No it's not.... anything thats hard and out of the box thing requires a lot of effort.
This man could do everything in the realm of any domain of knowledge.
I think his methodology or ideas could somehow reveal something in further studies and body of thought from the future. He should also consider reading philosophy of science. This will definitely redirect the rigor and foundations of his theory of TCMU. He should also constantly challenged his assumptions and (if so) don't fell into dogmatic thinking. I think he could believe in some esoteric thoughts but not necessarily pertaining to his more broad philosophical and scientific studies.
Unfortunately, intelligence does not necessarily correlate with WISDOM.
Bohm is worth looking at. I would be very interested in that.
Most based man on the planet as well.
He's confusing Eric Weisstein with Eric Weinstein
And they say the steins and bergs don't rule the world 🙄
@@yourlogicalnightmare1014 not sure how his comment proves your bs summary, but I guess we all can't be geniuses
@@aliengreeter
You treat your ignorance as a weapon, but it's pointed at you, not me 🫵😃
At least he didn’t confuse Harvey and Eric like I normally do
Except for the TOE which is Eric's TOE.
Now, I did watch Eric's Oxford address about GU, and I can't pretend I understood all, or most of it, but as it looks to my (uninformed) eye, GU doesn't seem to be committed to a generative or non-generative geometry, at least not anymore than Langan is (Langan seems to have _enough_ determinism in the CTMU for a description like GU I think). GU describes a 4 dimensional manifold that is our universe, as a fibre in a 14 dimensional object, but the extra dimensions come from the metric, and travelling along them tells us how the metric (lengths, angles, temporal-intervals) change. So reading this object as a "real" shape in the same way other theories like say ST might be comitted to 11+ dimensional space might not be necessary to reading GU; since GU is talking about a geometry of "mapping curvature", as weird as that sounds, and how these mappings change in a determinate way as you change position and time. Eric just (alleges to have) found a geometry for this 14 dimensional manifold that's consistent with some standard mathematical physics, plus some other things like a new particle and chiral matter. But I don't believe there's an explanation in GU for _why_ the geometry is the way it is, or a causal account for our universe being that specific fibre on this geometry. GU just gives us an object whose mathematical description can account for the mathematical descriptions of other things. Eric is a mathematical physicist. Description is what they deal in, more than explanation. So perhaps Langan could permit that the geometry of GU _can be_ generative, as an explanation for what is seen in GU.
There's Parallels between Bergson & Whitehead that are Fascinating!.
I'm seeing a lot of unfair dismissals of Langan due to his publication process being outside institutions. I don't think that's fair; in fact, I'd wager Curt invited him on _specifically because_ he was outside orthodoxy, and that his platforming was a statement to privilege the content of the CTMU over where it comes from.
It's also worth remembering that: academics don't dismiss the CTMU; they usually haven't heard about it, and are therefore in no position to evaluate it either way, and that it's probably appropriate to read Langan as a metaphysician first. If you want to evaluate his achievements, or the achievements of the CTMU, it's probably unfair to compare those achievements to anything other than metaphysicians or metaphysical projects.
Well put.
The dismissal is because he tweets things that are seriously unhinged and racist. His theories are not based on real math or physical tests, it's just his personal religious beliefs. If you are aware of some math in his theory that solves any of the problems that the other theories address, please explain it to me. Until then the CTMU needs to STFU.
Also, the people whi dismiss him usually do so without having understood a modicum of his theory. I actively tried to find any good critiqie of his work, but it often just resulted in me finding people claiming it's "word sallad".
@@adamlindfors5082I just finished reading the CTMU. There are interesting pieces to take from it. But the issue with the work is that it just proceeds over and over saying the steps he’s taking are necessary when there doesn’t seem to be any reason they are necessary (or even coherent) except that he says so. The word salad just serves to hide that incoherence.
Someone named Henri Bergson? Someone? 😭 That's Henri Bergson man.😭
Imagine if this dude went the academic route
I’d be curious to see his view on some of the ancient philosophies such as Advaita Vedanta.
I'd like to understand CTMU better but he seems to use all his own language and definitions.
Get this guy back on. Be interesting to hear more of his opinion on ai and people seeking immortality
Do you have a paper with all the additional math which is included in the ctmu?
Is there an AI trained on this stuff I could ask questions? That seems like a good way to possibly grok this perspective. I find it fascinating from what little I can see of it.
What do the Twistors of Roger Penrose and the Hopf Fibrations of Eric Weinstein and the "Belt Trick" of Paul Dirac have in common?
In Spinors it takes two complete turns to get down the "rabbit hole" (Alpha Funnel 3D--->4D) to produce one twist cycle (1 Quantum unit).
Can both Matter and Energy be described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature? (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Mass= 1/Length, with each twist cycle of the 4D Hypertube proportional to Planck’s Constant.
In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137.
1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface
137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted.
The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.)
If quarks have not been isolated and gluons have not been isolated, how do we know they are not parts of the same thing? The tentacles of an octopus and the body of an octopus are parts of the same creature.
Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. The "Color Force" is a consequence of the XYZ orientation entanglement of the twisted tubules. The two twisted tubule entanglement of Mesons is not stable and unwinds. It takes the entanglement of three twisted tubules to produce the stable proton.
I don't necessarily disagree that to have a theory of everything, you have to begin with everything, but I don't agree that it has to be a rule to begin with
You can't have a theory of everything if it's not self-referentially a theory of the relationship between theory and universe itself. In other words, it must be a theory of how theory works. The CTMU is unique in this regard.
there is no such thing as an IQ of 200. you can only legitimately go 3 SD’s above average with the traditional, full battery, well standardized major tests, which is 145. in practical everyday test use above 130 is exceedingly rare.
Pretty sure there is one of the major IQ tests that has the ability to measure beyond 145. Stanford-Binet? I could look it up but I'm being lazy.
Look up the 20/20 peice on his IQ testing
While there is clearly mathematics far outside my scope involved, it's fascinating to me how literary in nature these theories tend to be.
I don't understand anything that he or Curt ( or indeed similar guests ) are talking about. But for some reason my gut tells me they are explaining extremely important things, and therefore I'll sit through hours and hours in awe .....
Love this.
"To create a TOE you have to INCLUDE everything."
-Jordan Peterson has entered the chat
Love the straight forward non hyperbolic title, thank you. Remember Joe Rogan didn't get successful with extreme, drama centric, hyperbolic titles for his clips
this guy would be interesting to see how he conducts his day to day life.
Unfortunately, intelligence does not necessarily correlate with WISDOM.
@@JagadguruSvamiVegananda Making a ton of money or ascending the theoretical physics hierarchy is not necessarily wisdom
Please have Langan explain Stone Duality!
It’s like talking to a live Chat GPT. Lots of regurgitation. Where’s the innovation?
I am looking for discussion of how these theories relate to actual observed phenomena or evidence. There seems to be lacking the "proof" portion of the equation. In addition, the whole discussion boils down in my mind rather obviously to the simple assertion that "things are not always as they seem".....really? I am also drawn to the fundamental question of whether validating a Theory of Everything would in fact change anything or offer mankind anything useful. As in, will my life be any more significant, fulfilling or worthy when I discover that in fact I am living in a simulation managed by a host system? Is there an answer to the question "we care about CTMU because......"...
I don't think the CTME "starts from everything" any more than Wolfram's ToE does. The CTME doesn't start with an explanation of consciousness -- it doesn't even offer a path to an explanation, it just abstractly asserts it to be foundational.
It litterally does. It defines perception as computation and perceptual syntax as the foundation of reality, as well as a tautological truth. And it's CTMU btw.
The math encyclopedia guy is someone different with the same name as Eric W.
You need to have Tai Okami on and his TOE called Travelers theory.
I would like to hear him explain more about Marxism and what philosophical criticisms he has there.
I would like him to relate this to the philosophical underpinnings of capitalism and what happening with it currently, which Yanis Varoufakis has described as techno feudalism.
I like listening to people's various TOEs, but feel that educating ourselves about the function of society and how we can make it better is what's needed most in the world right now.
A lot of people are stuck living terrible lives with little free time to even think or do philosophy.
Many are miserable.
Mental health is becoming an ever growing crisis and shows little signs of letting up.
What can the average person do to bring about more justice in our society and economic system?
I'm by no means a die hard Marxist, but I find the critique of capitalism to be necessary if we really want to live in a free prosperous society that isn't dependent on exploitation, which I consider to be unethical, especially with our level of technical advancement.
His TOE is somehow beautiful and feels so complimentary. It opens up many avenues of thought. I'm hardly into science, but in its complete philosophy and coherence the theory resonates perfectly
After posting my earlier comment below -- Just finished listening to the rest of the detailed interview -- and I must say that there exist lots of synergies between both of our theories
For example, as much as I empathize with Chris Langan’s statement that his theory is the only super tautological TOE - how about I present our firm’s one such super tautological POV ( or what we call meta reality or meta sovereignty(or cosmic karma or al-Malik) of everything)?
For example, our model not only resolves the so called IQ/bell curve controversy(you both discussed) but also unites all worldviews (including atheism and agnosticism) for a larger cause of helping everyone to complement each other and live a happy life with their “purpose appropriate IQ”. In other words, our approach accomplishes it using an integrated reformation in partnership with all worldviews (including atheism and agnosticism) ?
(Note : The reason for the IQ gap across people groups is due to our yardstick approach of comparing apples to oranges - meaning measuring an IQ of a person ( say with a pastoral/priesthood purpose/election/calling) using a scientific IQ yardstick of another person ( with a scientist purpose election/calling). In other words, one size IQ yardstick doesn’t fit all )
That said, First as alluded in the earlier comment,
With FSC’s 2/3:1/3 rule being the root cause of the bell curve pattern exhibited by both people and planet alike, how about I anchor my physics/philosophy/psychology blended view?
While I agree with the implications of IQ gap , however, we as a firm have a complementary POV about their root causes including the solution.
(Note -- Part of the inspiration for this approach comes from my mixed missionary/military ancestral heritage from the British commonwealth 3-5 generations ago(Indian/Irish/Jewish/SA roots), who were involved in translating scripture/literature from European languages into Asian/African languages and vice-versa. So my hope is that our firm's scientific, reality accurate, race and worldview neutral point of view, hopefully helps us to solve it as one integrated/united team)
Before I go into the details, first, here is the summary
1. Root cause of bell curve pattern
Alpha factor (aka fine structure constant or FSC's 2/31/3 rule of nature/quantum mechanics is the cause of the IQ and EQ including many other biological genetics features, In other words, this 2/3 (or 70%) factor decides every one of our “life purpose or calling appropriate IQ/EQ traits”. Turns out, scriptures of both west and east call it as election factor of Bible (or Guru/Rishi factor of east).
2. Solution:
It is a 2 part (nature and nurture solution)
Nature part : Help everyone early on in life, to discover their life purpose or election (including its appropriate IQ ) by discerning the so called reality blueprint of nature ( aka sovereignty or cosmic karma or al-Malik blueprint of nature in worldview philosophical language) as nature has designed every one of our calling in a complementary manner (like a jigsaw puzzle). See below for details
Nurture part : Design a personalized purpose discovery/execution roadmap( with aIQ/EQ appropriate education curriculum) to accomplish it
One of the best ways to accomplish this two part solution is what we as a firm call as "integrated reformation in partnership with leaders from all disciplines, races and worldviews", in an united/integrated manner as explained below in details
With that said, let us dive deeper without any further ado below
1. Root cause of IQ gap or bell curve
As alluded earlier, this Alpha factor (aka fine structure constant or FSC 2/3 rule ) of quantum mechanics is the one that decides these IQ biological genetics.
In other words, this 2/3 ( or 70%) factor decides every one of our “life purpose or calling appropriate IQ/EQ” that are spread across all races. Turns out, scriptures of both west and east call it as election factor of Bible (or Guru/Rishi factor of east).
In case, anyone is interested about its mechanics from our latest consciousness and genetics research, from the standpoint integrating genetics/neuroscience with quantum mechanics including our consciousness model etc ,with a common navigation factor called election factor, that has been derived straight from fine structure constant (FSC aka alpha) of quantum mechanics
For example, the four fundamental bases that make up the gene segments of DNA follow our quadrupled DNA rotaxane model, with an mechanically interlocked architecture consisting of a circular DNA molecule threaded onto a linear DNA axle, holding the four bases ( I.e. adenine (A), cytosine (C), guanine (G), and thymine (T) to A.
Turns out, a similar Stoddart-Leigh's light sourced mech-interlocked rotaxane ring(lnkd.in/g6re2Nx6) is experimentally proven to be adhering to a thermodynamics equilibrium rule of FSC’s 2/3:1/3 ratios
This is where we have hypothesized that this 2/3:1/3 ruled caused thermodynamics imbalance of dipole must be one that must be controlling the genetics mechanics at large, including that of this algorithm at a quantum level.
For example, as you know as well as I do that the height of one unit of the DNA helix showing the Golden ratio pattern, the flip side of FSC(α) - which then goes back to our firm’s 5 FSC-GR driven 5 AITGEformulas of TOE, including our consciousness model as well as explained in my articles
This is where we have hypothesized that election factor is decided during this precise sub moment of conception, the unique Higgs dipole/quadrupole fields of both sperm and egg must be colliding to create the so called integrated Higgs field of the zygote with a zinc spark - which then start serving as the “dipole nanoantenna”, with a predetermined wavelength/frequency/angular momentum , as per the probability of the 2/3 rule of FSC & its flip-sided 1/3 rule of golden ratio, similar to BBN/stellar synthesis
This brings us to our TOE Engine (aka CONSCIO-SCOPE), that has been developed by solving these 10+ century-old unsolved problems (i.e. including 5+ $5MM prized problems from Clay institute) -- which brings us to our TOE/SOE thought experiment (TE)
-- What if the "fundamental frequency of QVF/ZPE and FSC(α)-Einstein-Bohr-HV-Maxwell Daemon governed TOE Engine" is nothing but the fundamental frequency of Riemann's zeta function Ζ(S) with a singularity of S=1+0i, that is made up of his harmonic oscillating zeros(S=1/2+it stacked on his 1/2 critical line (as per Gauss's/Euler product primes), before being transformed as a 137 frequency-spin momentum matched dipole, using our FSC(α)-GR-PLA+5 AITGE origin formulas?
In other words, our TOE/SOE engine is the one that is transforming the Riemann's zeros into an artistic unit charge dipole(see visual), by contracting/expanding its electric flux as the center of mass (as r = αR), before rotating its magnetic flux by 90 in such a way that it can be extended into the left plane as a paired unit charge, using the "only possible analytical continuation of Zeta" -- which brings us to our proof
This "one & only allowed analytically continued Zeta dipole" is what limits/constrains the ∞ pole of Riemann sphere to a value of 137 cycles( per Laurent/Cauchy residue including the α=r/R,=fe/fp=we/wp logic of our CP function as explained in my post (www.linkedin.com/posts/charlesprabakar_sovereign-ocean-w-its-10-toe-proofs6-clay-activity-7189304893994614785-vUjQ?)
lim t→ ∞ CP(1/2 + ti) = 1/α cycles of dipole
This is where we have also hypothesized that this toggle also lands as a dipole/quadrupole using the very same Riemann zeta function logic (z=1/2+it), in perfect alignment with the 4 gene segments of DNA follow the quadrupled DNA rotaxane model, with an unique S-number, thus deciding our unique election and genetic code perfectly like a jigsaw puzzle as explained by this clip facebook.com/share/v/cK6oJ7scpMSnEbA3/?mibextid=WC7FNe
Continued
2. Nature and nurture integrated solution using an integrated reformation in partnership with leaders from all disciplines and worldviews in an United manner
Turns out, our firm’s mission lies here only -- and rightfully so, we define leadership as not only helping others to discover their purpose but also help them to execute it within an organizational context (company or church or community)in a complementary service oriented mindset, as designed by reality
Simply put
Reality or Sovereign Leadership = Purpose leadership to help discover the purpose + Servant leadership to execute it in a complementary service oriented mindset, as designed by reality
This brings up the question of how can leaders do so?
Well, as we all know the best scripture prescribed option is asking the Holy Spirit to reveal it via prayer - however it is not easy for everyone!
So another complementary “ AND” option ( not a replacement ) option is to to model it!
This is precisely why we as a firm/ministry have modeled it, so that we can read it as if it is a book written in our hearts!
How do we do so?
Well, What if we read it using nature's original language called Math, as Math, in my mind, is that language?
There born is our scripture/science principles based META REALITY model using our “consciousness aware integrated meta-reality approach” that can unite all worldviews (by agreeing on a minimum set of common principles/beliefs everyone can agree) so that we all can solve much bigger problems facing humanity, in an integrated/united manner( e.g problems like economic productivity including climate change problems to name a few)
Meta-worldview Reality = f(α) {
1. Individual consciousness reality
Being spirit(M) + Becoming soul (B) = Doing Action (A) i.e. 2/3 FSC KE - 1/3 FSC PE = 1/3 A (Human Action) where KE=kinetic energy & PE= potential energy in negative
2. Collective consciousness reality 2/3 FSC KE - 1/3 FSC PE = 1/3 A
3. Natural energy resources reality 2/3 FSC KE - 1/3 FSC PE = 1/3 A (Universe Action) }
The beauty of our meta-worldview model is that it aligns with all the consciousness and language models out there including all worldview models as well, partly because, Math is the best mechanism to describe the experiences of consciousness with each other with minimal misunderstandings compared to vernacular languages based explanations!
This brings up my point that we need the following modeling prerequisites for us to implement both nature and nurture solutions
This brings us to the next point of consciousness imbalance (aka human condition or depravity ) that hinder us from discovering this nature/nurture solutions
For example, when we think about it, this so-called human condition in biological language (or depravity in scripture language) is the root cause of all problems of humanity (including IQ) as proven by our research.
This is why we say that every human need or problem is a direct/indirect manifestation of this human condition/depravity model problem only, as explained in this article below.
For example, the best biological explanation of “human condition or depravity” comes from a Darwinian biologist Dr. Jeremy Griffith - and if I may synthesize the gist of it
-- There is a continuous conflict happening within our body-soul-spirit complex, where our neurons based intellect try to wrest control from our genes based instincts - this conflict caused psychological condition is the root cause of human depravity.
This is where we have complemented his hypothesis that quantum mechanics caused entanglement is the root cause here, as it is the enabler of both biological instinct processes and intellectual processes alike!
In other words,
-- There is a continuous "consciousness imbalance" conflict happening within our body-soul-spirit complex, where our "neurons caused intellectual consciousness field" try to wrest control from our "genes-caused instincts consciousness field" - this consciousness imbalance caused by the "Quantum Entanglement" condition is the root cause of human condition or depravity
(Note : Our explanation is the super set explanation -- and I let you all decide - however listen to this 3 minute clip to understand the SIGNIFICANCE of our finding of QE root cause advancing even Dr Jeremy Griffith’s explanations(czcams.com/video/I9fxvuya0Bs/video.html) ---which brings me to my point i.e. climate change agenda of COP28.
Turns out, this very same instinct/intellect caused depravity is the root cause of IQ limitation including climate change problem as well, as proved by our research.
This brings us to the next point of choosing a worldview specific model of one’s liking ( or pick a META philosophical MODEL like ours), so that we can use them to balance it first so that we can discover our life purpose accurately
In other wields this meta model will be balanced perfectly only when we discover and execute our life purpose accurately
Similarly when every one in a community or country do so in a complementary manner, that community will be highly productive and prosperous
For example, the original purpose of all religious worldviews is to accomplish this nature/nurture integrated solution only.
However they all got sidetracked in the middle, partly because of politics and other personal egos ( i.e. whose worldview is better etc) which brings me to my POV of how can all worldviews agree on a common agenda for the larger societal good?
Speaking of which is where, we asked
- Why not distill the essence of all worldviews in a worldview neutral, reality accurate scientific manner, so that we all can unite under an “integrated vision” to fulfill the needs of these three stakeholders by multiplying productivity with a quantum leap, that much faster/better?
There born was our sovereign ocean/cosmic karma/al-Malik model, that can be stated in a principles form as follows
Reality model + Reality model balancing mechanism
Now using this reference principle/pattern, here is the essence of every worldview
1. Sanatana dharma
Sanatana ( or cosmic karma) is the reality model + dharma or goodness is its balancing mechanism
2. Judaic Christian worldview
Sovereignty is the reality model + righteousness or goodness based salvation is its balancing mechanism
3. Islamic worldview
Al-Malik is the reality model + al-BIr based Islamic salvation is its balancing mechanism
Now, within this framing, how about we develop a scientific model - and see how it maps to the balancing mechanisms of all three major worldviews?
The idea here is to develop a reality accurate scientific model, by modeling the three key stakeholders of reality, in a scientific neutral language
Now
One way science balances this reality model is using the "fine structure constant" called alpha using the the following model in a pseudo lagrangian format,
Reality = f(α) {
1. Individual human energy (IHE) consciousness model -> spirit(M) + soul (B) + G = body action (A) -> e^2=α (2ε0hc)
2. Collective human energy (CHE)Consciousness energy model > spirit(M) + soul (B) + G = body action (A) -> # of CHE x e^2=α (2ε0hc)
3. Natural energy (NE) consciousness model -> NE x e^2=α (2ε0hc)
}
This model, in its default mode, is not well balanced due to the multi-part quantum entanglement phenomenon of human depravity - thus triggering humans to do evil!
This is the problem all worldviews are trying to solve! In other words, the objective of all worldviews is to balance this model only, using various balancing mechanisms as follows
1. The solution to balance lever #1 of individual consciousness
- Sanatana dharma worldview : Dhana dharma and yoga dharma
- Judaic Christian worldview: Individual Salvation based Kingdom of God
- Islamic worldview : Islamic salvation
2. The solution to balance lever #2 of collective consciousness
- Sanatana dharma worldview : Varna shastra driven Manu dharma based Ramraj
- Judaic Christian worldview: Collective salvation based Kingdom of heaven
- Islamic worldview : Islamic laws based Islamic state
3. The solution to balance lever #3 of Natural energy resources consciousness
- Sanatana dharma worldview : Shakthi dharma
- Judaic Christian worldview: Creation focused salvation based kingdom of heaven
- Islamic worldview : Islamic laws based Islamic heaven
Now that we have established our baseline, can we clearly see where the disagreement lies?
In any case, this realization of is what inspired us to create an Acts 17 style bridging framework called sovereign ocean with a following motto
- The doctrines of Salvation (including sovereignty of God) are not only the way to go to heaven, but also the “best of the best” way to be productive in marketplace, as proven by our scripture/science principles driven sovereign ocean framework with three stakeholders
1. Individual consciousness reality
2. Collective consciousness cultural reality
3. Natural energy resources reality
1. The solution to balance or optimize lever #1 of individual consciousness
- “Individual Salvation” based Kingdom of God solution
2. The solution to balance or optimize lever #2 of collective consciousness cultural reality
- “Integrated Church focused salvation” driven Kingdom of heaven
3. The solution to balance or optimize lever #3 of Natural energy resources consciousness
- “Creation focused salvation” driven kingdom of heaven, as creation is also longing for salvation, according to Paul in Romans 8:17-25 (as reaffirmed by Prof NT Wright as well
More specifically, while church has done a good job of implementing the part 1 individual salvation solution, we have missed the boat on kingdom salvation solution and creation salvation solution -which brings us to the the 3 part solution as intended by scripture, as summarized below
- A Saved/Sanctified/Gifted/Fruited/Spirit filled person equipped with our sovereign ocean tools is 10x productive ( e.g Daniels and Josephs of scripture)
- “Kingdom principles” augmented capitalism model of our sovereign ocean approach is the only “10x productivity generating capitalism approach”
- “Creation’s salvation principles” augmented, purpose score driven sovereign/conscious sustainalism tools within our sovereign ocean is the best of the best sustainability solution, as affirmed by NT Wright as well
This then raises the question of how to change course now, as the train has already left the station ( so to speak), in the sense, the world is already divided.
In other words, some of these divisions have been made using their own worldview specific piecemeal solutions - which brings me to our integrated reformation in three parts below
Part A How do we bring this common understanding among all worldviews about lever #1(individual goodness) without interfering in their individual freedom?
Part B How all worldviews can come to a middle ground agreement when it comes to balancing lever #2 (collective culture) so that we all can unite under an “integrated vision” to fulfill the needs collectively by multiplying productivity with a quantum leap, that much faster/better?
Part C How all worldviews can come to a middle ground agreement when it comes to balancing lever#3(natural resources), so that we all can unite under an “integrated vision” to be efficient in resource usage by multiplying productivity with a quantum leap, that much faster/better?
Part A How do we bring this common understanding among all worldviews about lever #1(individual goodness) without interfering in their individual freedom?
Speaking of which, if I may compare and contrast the goodness providing balancing mechanisms of all worldviews
1) Sanatana dharma - Advaita philosophy with a pursuit of balancing this equation with a goal of merging self with Brahman
M (balanced using wisdom or Abhisek) + B (balanced by will-power/vairagya/meditation/yoga/dharma plus few other techniques) >= A (balanced by Asana) as promoted by Adi Sankara
2) Sanatana dharma - Dvaita philosophy with a pursuit of balancing this equation with a goal of keeping self and Brahman distinct, as self cannot become one with Brahman according to this philosophy, as promoted by Madavacharya
M (balanced using wisdom or Abhisek) + B (balanced by will-power/vairagya/meditation/yoga/dharma plus few other techniques) >= A (balanced by Asana)
3) Sanatana dharma - Vishishtadvaita philosophy with a pursuit of balancing this equation with a goal of keeping self and Brahman distinct in this world, but become one with Brahman in eternity, according to this philosophy, as promoted by Ramanujar with an additional balancing technique called surrender
M (balanced using wisdom or Abhisek) + B (balanced by will-power/vairagya/meditation/yoga/dharma plus few other techniques like surrender ) >= A (balanced by Asana)
4) Islam worldview with a pursuit of with a pursuit of balancing this equation as follows
M (balanced using wisdom) + B (balanced will power/meditation//hypnosis plus charity ) >= A (balanced by good works)
5) Judaic Christian worldview - with a pursuit of balancing this equation using GRACE
M (anointing of Holy Spirit) + B (replaced by Jesus's perfect righteousness/meditation etc ) + GRACE >= A (eliminating flesh desires by symbolically remembering Jesus' bodily death) repeating as sanctification cycles. In other words, the LHS will be balanced with RHS using GRACE (i.e. God's throne of grace ready to accept everyone by God himself paying the penalty for the sin chasm).
Now that we have compared and contrasted the balancing mechanisms of lever #1 for common understanding, this brings us to the next question
Part B How all worldviews can come to a middle ground agreement when it comes to balancing lever #2 (collective culture) so that we all can unite under an “integrated vision” to fulfill the needs collectively by multiplying productivity with a quantum leap, that much faster/better?
In this part, the assumption is that everyone has already discovered their life calling ( from part A) so that everyone can implement them in a complementary manner by creating an collective consciousness culture
While culture has been defined many different ways, we define culture as a snapshot of collective consciousness of all interactions and interventions of people within a society at any specific space-time bounded period, as quantified by this reality model.
Simply Put,
The solution to save/solve collective cultural behavior depravity is our 10x producing Next Gen capitalism model using the following motto
-- Strategy/economics/finance transformation is a value creator and innovation/marketing/digital transformation is a value accelerator, whereas culture/leadership transformation is a value enabler
No comment on string theory or LQG?
Thank you for featuring a conversation with Chris Langan. His theoretical cognitive model of the universe, TCMU, is ignored by mainstream academics and their institutions because his model points to the reality of a Creating God. A blatant bias indeed…
My favorite Theory is from Neil Turok
Why u no ask him about Ed Witten?
The CTMU needs Nonconceptuality
The final problem with Chris's theory is that at the conclusion of it all, Self is separate from God. This is due to his Christian beliefs.
My triune Fundamental Model of Reality is exactly as the title indicates. This expresses the creation and function of reality at the most fundamental level possible. It is the state of superposition (singularity) from which the appearance of duality arises
Yes, start with everything. I like that. I'm thinking consciousness is a good place to start, but how to tackle that, eh?
MTS
I'll give some hints: Context-independent principles or principles that cannot be abstracted away VS context-dependent principles, meta-axiomatic principles inherent in thought itself, the inherent systematic nature of reasoning and the logical necessity of systems, non-contradiction, coherence, consistency, syntactic consistency of the objects of thought and the framework of cognition and reasoning, The Paradox of Cognitive Reductionism, The Paradox of Ineffability, self-reference, meta-transcendental inquiry, ... I could give many more hints, but I think that's a good start.
@@thedouglasw.lippchannel5546 😒
You can't coherently start with the thing that nobody has been able to define or sufficiently explain.
I mean, you *can*, but you have to acknowledge the big gaping explanatory hole at the foundation of the theory.
@@drangus3468 Start with CIG Theory
Why the summary dismissal of Marx?
Until Academia ditches the corporate greed mindset and instead they focus on pursuing the actual Truths despite of how they might feel, until then they'll be forever stuck in Plato's cave.
Every salesman of miracle elixirs of life has a good, well rehearsed routine. Most know a little about many things, but have limited knowledge in specific areas. Chris strikes me as this type. He seems quick to discount other's theories, for one reason or another, but doesn't elaborate much on the basis of his rejection of them. I think he should definitely refrain from commenting on religion and politics, as I don't think he knows much about either.
Chris, just lay out your TOE or CTMU, as best you can, and let us examine its feasibility and applicability. Forget everyone else and give us your best stream of consciousness about everything and we will disassemble it for you.
I have size 12 feet, but still no TOE of my own.
When are scientists going to figure out that the changes in the measures of time and distance due to the amount of gravity in the vicinity change the speed of light relative to our measures of time and distance where we are? Scientists can’t figure out that where gravity changes time and distance it changes the speed of light.
Space is also not flat in the measures of time and distance in larger scales just like the Earth is not flat on larger scales. Light MUST indeed travel at the speed of light C. When distance is stretched light must travel that distance in the time determined by C. That means the light is traveling faster as perceived by us in a more contracted frame of reference. Add to that the fact that a second passes by faster away from the center of mass which increases the speed light MUST travel even more. It’s not complicated. It’s so simple. It’s the very reason things appear to be moving faster than the speed of light moving away from the center of the galaxy because they are moving faster yet without exceeding the speed of light. I don’t know why that is so hard to understand.
There are three rates to consider. 1. The diminishing effect or draw of gravity away from the center of mass. 2. The increasing rate of time away from the center of mass. 3. The increasing measure of distance away from the center of mass.
Speed is measured by time and distance which change and that changes the speed of light and causation. Distance gets longer without gravity and time goes by faster, both of which combine to speed up causation. The light has to arrive at a farther distance faster when distance is stretched *and* time also goes by faster. *Then* there is the first thing to consider and that is the diminishing draw of gravity which means things eventually slow down the farther away they are from the center mass of a galaxy. (It's not complicated.) 😎
Redshift happens when light leaves a galaxy. Blueshift happens as light enters a galaxy. All things being the same, the light will be redshifted and then blueshifted back again. Except we already know galaxies are different sizes. The distant galaxies that we can see are very large and the mass between here and there is large causing more redshift than our small galaxy can blueshift back to its original spectrum. The more distant a galaxy is the more accumulated gravity there is causing more redshift.
Being imagination comparison infinity
Oh, we're all invited with the bands engaged
And we're going to have some fun
Miss Clara Nolan gives a ball
Today she's twenty-one
We've borrowed knives and tablecloths
From all around the town
And every man must bring a chair
If he wants to sit down
[Chorus]
Oh, will you come? Oh, will you come?
Oh, you never will forget it if you come
For the bells are ringing and the girls are singing
And the fiddle and the harp to go, "Tra-la-la-la-la"
It's teasing, it's pleasing and it's squeezing free for all
There's courting in the cornеr at Miss Clara Nolan's ball
[Verse 2]
Oh, the clock strikes ten and thе dance begins
And we keep it up 'til day
There will be no collection
For expenses to defray
We'll have golden rye and lager beer
And Philadelphia ale
And if the keg is empty
Oh, we'll go and fill the pail
[Chorus]
Oh, will you come? Oh, will you come?
Oh, you never will forget it if you come
For the bells are ringing and the girls are singing
And the fiddle and the harp to go, "Tra-la-la-la-la"
It's teasing, it's pleasing and it's squeezing free for all
There's courting in the corner at Miss Clara Nolan's ball
[Verse 3]
There's Larry comes in with his Irish fight
Fiddling fiddling too
He plays the simple Irish waltz
Likewise the Peek-a-boo
Of course it's not a Northman's house
Without pegs behind the door
And if there's no place to hang your hat
Just hang it on the floor
[Chorus]
Oh, will you come? Oh, will you come?
Oh, you never will forget it if you come
For the bells are ringing and the girls are singing
And the fiddle and the harp to go, "Tra-la-la-la-la"
It's teasing, it's pleasing and it's squeezing free for all
There's courting in the corner at Miss Clara Nolan's ball
Just a bit of commentary from someone who is looking at all this NPC character fun from a more spiritual perspective.
Don’t confuse a sharp memory with intelligence.
In any case if one does enough IQ tests I am sure one will obtain a spread of IQ scores ranging from abnormal to genius.
To quote 200+ IQ scores is utterly meaningless
IQ tests are designed so that memory and practice has minimal effect.
Is this so called CIG Theory worth looking at? I mean it's been 10 years. What the friendly.
This guy is a smart man. But some of the stuff he says I just don't agree with. Like his personal religious views. Don't get me wrong I do respect him though.
No one has all the answers.
Yes absolutely. Hes trying to incorporate his spiritual beliefs as well as his very controversial beliefs about race into his theory and this makes the whole thing unprovable, unscientific and ultimately insane. He obviously has a lot of brain power but I don't think he's the great intellect that people want to believe he is. He has too much kanye in his personality.
Yo Kurt is there no validity to the Light Luv theory? I feel like it should be discussed more widely but literally noone has discussed it....
Would love to read how he's pulling morality, every field of science that studies some aspect of mental life and the correct political view out of his TOE.
I also want to read precisely what holes he's referring to in Marxism.
This man obviously listens to Tool.
What about Terrence Howard and Robert Edward Grant??
I’ve seen this dude in other interviews. I will definitely check this out, but I suspect that there will continue to be nothing particularly new or revealing that is going to change any perspectives for those genuinely seeking the truth.
What is "TRUTH"?
@@JagadguruSvamiVegananda The CTMU, a logical structure that is closed, consistent, and comprehensive which reflects inclusion in reality. Truth is that which is real, and reality is described by the CTMU.
@@CTMUSINGULARITY, in your own words, define "REALITY", Slave.
@@JagadguruSvamiVegananda Being in alignment with reality.
@@JagadguruSvamiVeganandaTruth is that which corresponds to reality.
TEO must explain, why is that with a low IQ i can enjoy listening to one with high IQ.
There is a saying in my country "you can look good, but you can't be smart in life". His smartness looks good😅
I’d like to see this guy and Eric talk. This langan guy is bright enough, but his history and his almost religious cult like following makes it seem a bit wacko. But I could get a better sense if he’s actually speaks to someone who knows what they are talking about to see if he’s just coming at it strangely and knows what he’s talking about, or he’s totally just a snake oil salesman
This was great, but it came across as a test of knowing what is in and what isn't, a much more detailed interview next please, let's include the properties of dicoherence as subject matter.
Why is this guy being consulted as if he was an oracle? He is nothing of the kind. He gives no concrete proof that he actually knows what he is talking about. This is completely ridiculous.
For entertainment purposes only.
You mad bro?
Nobody is an oracle. Nobody but you needs a proof of anything. This interview is for entertainment purposes only, just like your comment.
So What’s your IQ?
Genuine question: is it possible for someone to get a result of 200 from taking an IQ test? Or is "an IQ of 200" another way of saying someone is extremely intelligent? Have people reported to have an IQ of 200+ actually taken a test to determine their score?
Edit: I watched part of the linked video which explains that this gentleman has the highest recorded IQ in the US.
Get a mirror. I don't think Chris has aged much since his 20/20 interview around 2000🤔
"The Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe or CTMU (pronounced "cat-mew") is the first self-simulation theory" LOL at the "firsts" - never heard of dream within a dream? I guess not, AUM is the proper pronunciation of OM - though missing the included silence.... you'll need to include buddhism, christianity, the tao te ching and many others if you want a theory of everything... but then if you read them you'd know we already have one (God's will) and any theory that excludes it will be disproven by it.
Didnt I see this guy on Jerry Springer in 09?
Or Seinfeld. One of those Jerries.
@@asynchronicity seinfeld yes of course.
Lol
@@Metameinitiatedbycontact Hahahaha
@16:49 reversible flow machine ya they cray
Wow.
After reading Langan's books, watching his videos and perusing his social media I've concluded that his theory is utterly unprovable, invents words and concepts to make it fit, really isn't as intelligent as he proports to be and is nothing but a conman. His supposed theory of everything the ctmu is nothing more than pure conjecture, based upon massive assumptions that cannot be proven, invented gobbledygook, logical fallacies, circular logic and his obvious narcissism. It's at it's core a new religious cosmology that requires faith due to a complete lack of evidence, which of course places the author as the most important man in the world (in his own mind). No doubt his few idiot disciples will get all sooky and resort to the typical "you just don't understand it" retorts... When they can prove even the tiniest amount of it, I might actually care lol.
Honestly, I'm not sure why you are wasting time interviewing Langan. He is a nice guy and pretty smart, but his CTMU is him grossly overstepping his own boundaries. His CTMU has no basis in any established theory. · It has no basis in any experimental or observational evidence and contradicts itself in numerous instances. If you have ever taken the time to read it, you find very quickly that it is nearly unreadable. He writes in a manner that is intentionally obfuscating and he redefines common words to his own unique meaning, and then using metaphors in this new “language” to describe physics. It is why no physicists give him the time of day.
I put him in the same boat as Weinstein. He is smart enough to come up with complex ideas and "theorize" them into a bowl of fairly legitimate mathematical spaghetti that goes in circles. No matter how many times you dig the fork in, the bowl has no bottom or conclusion.
Langan seems bright, but his tendency to embrace conspiracy theories and his far-right outlook undercut his arguments, leaving him unfortunately looking like just another pseudoscience crackpot.
My hypothesis: The universe is a blackhole. It’s surface a fractal of plasma bubbles.
I heard somewhere the brain uses stochastic inference to solve differentiation on a meta cognitive level. True without proof.
I’ve had enough of this Lang guy I mean okay his IQ is high but what has he accomplished?
Increase your IQ and understanding of physics and learn*
Start with the word 'tautology' and go from there.
It's odd to consider how many geniuses don't change "my" life...
He is a fantastic gardener... a real green thumb
@@dennycote6339 Says the guy who voted for Brandon*
The Meta-Cognitive Model of the Thermodynamic Autodidactic Universe and Multiverse!.
No serious academician takes this guy seriously.
What impact or contribution has he made? None.
And what has academia accomplished? Most of them do nothing and the sciences are largely stagnated. Academia desperately needs the type of intellectual rigor that Langan represents.
@@T_Fizzle He does not represent any rigor. What has academia accomplished? Like developed 7nm transistors that use quantum mechanics as a basis so that you can write here and discuss stagnated sciences. He did not read any Wolfram papers and does not understand how complex system emerge from simple rules - for example cellular automata. Stephen Wolfram shows how current theories can emerge from simple rules of discrete models and computational irreducibility.
thoughts on the replicability crisis?
Your foundation is irreparably corrupted.
Academic publishing is intrinsically tied to Jeff Epstein through Robert and Ghislaine Maxwell.
Eric Weinstein has already finished you guys. You're all shills and you've moved the needle precisely zero degrees from standard position in terms of physical sciences accomplishment. America is now losing to China and Japan. Your time is up. Israel is finished.
@@mioszlinkiewicz4272 Oh wow, we made computer chips smaller, we increased internet accessibility, and what a better place our world is for it. Everyone, go on now, pat yourselves on the back, you have saved the human race from suffering and misery!
@@mioszlinkiewicz4272 I don't know Wolfram so I can't comment on that. I do know 90+% of academics are useless or worse. But to claim ideas are valid or invalid based solely on whether or not they come from establishment sources, is not a substantive argument. Whether Langan is correct or not, he demonstrates first principles thinking which is absent or lacking from the majority of establishment academics.
This guy is obviously a complete charlatan, lmao.
Yes, bought a couple of his books. No rigor, no derivations, just wprd salad from words he makes up and poorly defines.
@@wildmanz8233So how does he define „metaphysical“?
😢200 iq exists ?
@@mazolab okay thank you
You are talking to Chris Langen? I used to have exchanges with him almost everyday. He is hostile and defensive and one of the dumbest people I ever talked to. He specifically wrote his pseudo-theory, CTMU, with an unnecessarily complex grammar to keep people from understanding how shallow it is. I tried to explain to him the fundamental flaws but he either couldn't understand anything I said or he chose to ignore it because he already knew that it's garbage. He told me that he wanted to debate Richard Dawkins, so I gave him several paths of working towards that goal and he avoided all of them. He doesn't really want a public debate.
*I used to never put any other books or objects on top of my KJV that was given to me in 1961. I cherishED it my whole life from when I was just 8 years old. That is up until about 8 years ago! Now it stays on the bottom of a big box of books in my closet. And unless Jesus changes it back into God's Holy word, I will never open it or any other bible again the rest of my life!*
*Satan is spreading his evil across the globe and most people are beginning to see it. But sadly only a tiny few see what he's done to God's word...*
*What The Father has spoken will never change, His promises are still good and our prayers are still answered! Hallelujah!!! But as impossible as this sounds, like so many of the true stories in scripture, our bibles have all been supernaturally changed by Satan in the last several years, right in our homes, in the fulfillment of prophecy. It's being done to prepare for the reign of the antichrist. All languages and all translations have been changed along with concordances, encyclopedias, dictionaries, history books, the original Hebrew, Greek, Latin and Aramaic manuscripts. Even the Dead Sea Scrolls have been changed!*
*I'm 71, was saved when I was 10, and have read only the exact same copy of the King James bible my church gave me in 1961. (This does not mean I was a King James onlyist but now I'm glad I never read other ones or I might not have noticed the changes as soon.) I had memorized many scriptures from it through the years. Then in 2014 I started seeing changes in it that I couldn't explain. I had never owned a computer or heard of the Mandela Effect back then. But after being given my first computer in 2016 I finally found out why I had been noticing all of the oddities that I couldn't explain. I then started diligently studying what should actually have been called the "Daniel 7:25 effect". That's where God said He would give the antichrist the power to do this. (Change times and laws, history and scripture) We're seeing many end time prophecies being fulfilled SUPERNATURALLY! This is some of the "lying signs and wonders" God told us He would give the AC power to perform which would even deceive His very elect, if it were possible in 2nd Thessalonians chapter two!*
*God said in the end of days, (NOW!) that He would send us a famine for hearing His words in Amos **8:11** and that He would give the antichrist the ability to do this in Daniel 7:25. In Daniel 12:4 & 12:9 He told him to seal his book until the end days. He told John **_not_** to seal his book because the end time is at hand in Revelation 22:10. One of the Greek definitions of ''seal'' in Strongs concordance is “to protect from Satan”. He also told us to “hide His words in our hearts”, which meant memorize, if not word for word at least the essence of what was written, because He knew this was going to happen.*
*God commanded us to "prove all things", and people **_better_** obey Him, especially on this subject. I urge you to research this. There are many brothers and sisters making videos about the changes with more proof of what was originally written and I have lots more about this in my playlist 👉 which can be found by typing in (PROOF OF BIBLE CHANGE RESIDUE JUNKIE 1)* 👈
*I've continued to stay in God's word by reading what has been documented to be what used to be written and what Satan has been changing. Soon Amos **8:12** will be fulfilled too and we won't be able to find God's word anymore, and the only way it can happen is by not being able to see these videos and PDF written lists of documented changes like the one at (amos)(8)(.)(org)*
*May God bless all who read this with eyes to see this incredible faith strengthener, and how close we are to our Saviour's return!!!!*
*P.S. Everyone is going to learn about this one way or the other. I'm just trying to keep so many people from hearing Jesus explain it to them at the Gate. If you ask for them at the address on my about page I will send you links for 17 films that absolutely prove the snake bite is the mark. And yt hates me, they won't notify me of replies and won't post my answers so write me at residue junkie in one word at g mail for lots more info yt would never allow you to see.*
❤✝️💪
*P.P.S. YT will not notify me if you reply here so write me at residue junkie in one word at g mail.*
Praise YHWH!
I mean he talks God but the guy only believes in his titanic ego.. anything that contradicts his self aggrandising perspective is brushed aside withiut justification