The Death of Stalin | T43 Heavy Tank Part 1 Featuring
Vložit
- čas přidán 3. 02. 2021
- On September 7th, 1945, military heads of the Western Powers were horrified by what they saw rumbling towards them along Charlottenburger Chaussee in central Berlin during the Victory Parade. Celebrating the end of the Second World War, the increasingly threatening Soviet Union unveiled its latest tank to the world: the IS-3 heavy tank. As these machines clattered down the parade route, a sense of consternation enveloped the representatives of the British, US, and French armies. What they saw was a tank with well-sloped and apparently heavy armor, a piked nose, wide tracks, and a gun at least 120 mm in caliber, and belonging to a future potential adversary. The IS-3 was clearly a serious potential threat to their own tank forces in any such conflict.
If you liked this video, please consider donating on Patreon or Paypal!
Patreon: / tankartfund
Paypal: www.paypal.me/tankartfund
Article: tanks-encyclopedia.com/120mm-...
Sources:
Archive Sources:
Elements of Armament Engineering: Ballistics, Part 2
Standard Military Vehicle Characteristic Data Sheets
Aberdeen Proving Ground Firing Record APG File: 451.6/2, DA File: 470.4/APG
Guns for Heavy Tanks
Advisory Panel on Armor 334/44 August 19 1954
Army Operational Research Group Report 11/51 Performance of British and Russian Tanks
Fort Benning: R.P. Hunnicutt Collection with courtesy of Sofilein
Literature:
R.P. Hunnicutt:
Firepower: A history of the American Heavy Tank
Patton: A History of the American Main Battle Tank
Kenneth W. Estes:
M103 Heavy Tank 1950-74
Marines under armor: The Marine Corps and the Armored Fighting Vehicle, 1916-2000
Lieutenant Colonel Lee F. Kichen, USA-Retired:
Private Correspondence
On Point, The journal of Army History, Volume 24, no. 4, Spring 2018
Max Hastings:
The Korean war
Technical Manuals:
TM 9-2350-206-12
Additional Sources:
Camp Colt to Desert Storm
AFV Weapons 41: M103 Heavy Tank + M41 Light Tank(Walker Bulldog)
History of Acquisition in the Department of Defense, Volume 1
Intimidating the World: The United States Atomic Army, 1956-1960
Tankograd T-10
Tank-net.com
mcvthf.org/Book/ANNEX%20G-4.html
USMC History Division
The Chieftain’s Hatch: Improving Super Pershing
Reddit: / tankencyclopedia
TE Shop: www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/Goo...
Our website: www.tanks-encyclopedia.com
Gaming News Website: www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/games/
Facebook: / tanksencyclopedia
Twitter: / tanksenc
Discord: / discord
Email: tanks.encyclopedia@gmail.com
An article by Darren Hazes
Narrated by @Sofilein
Edited by Jim Zawacki
Sound edited by Sofilein and Gabe
I love everything that was built wholly or partially in response to the IS-3
0:41 she is talking as if she will just spontaneously combust laughing thinking of the all the jokes that can be made about the chonk factor of the tank
Cuz now everyone knows Stalin was trolling western "allies" with IS-3 nowhere as capable as it seemed at first glance.
@Kayden Markus you two fucking bots are here as well!??
*Here we see the mighty T-95 crying silently in the corner, its armor, gun, motor, and potential all forgotten.*
@AKUJIRULE Yes. Very tragic
Yes. Potential.
I hear sofilien ...I click
@@pavelalexe9254 I don't think "simp" is the correct word for what I said ...I see sofilien as a teacher .
@@mr.waffentrager4400 goood
Good video and great narration...Sofi, don't change a thing.
She is one of your better readers.
Thanks to the creators of this great article, thanks to @Sofilein for her great voice.
Good reading. Stable, paced, convincing.
What a magnificent presentation
3:57 that is a deceivingly well made Panther costume on a Soviet tank.
Indeed; looks like a T-55 masked up for carneval. Honest, it doesn't look too bad for Hollywood purposes. And being a T-55, it doesn't break down before the shooting.
At 1:53, looks like our T34 had an excellent shot trap under the mantlet, and to a lesser extent, the T43. Hope the hull roof was thick enough to give the crew adequate protection.
thx
Maybe it’s just me, but when you get to describing all the comparisons of various guns and the wide variety of ammunition you need to slow down your verbal delivery. You’re extremely articulate, but it’s impossible to focus or digest anything you’re describing at this point. Otherwise it’s an excellent video and your narration is fine....
Use the article. All the info is there at your own pace.
@@TanksEncyclopediaYT Good point. The only way to absorb the great info she is giving out is back up and pause the video; play portions a few times through, etc.... Again, I’m not trying to be critical, it is a very informative video and she generally presents it as well as anyone can....
you know you saying that the UK and US would combine efforts in the post war just makes me love the idea of an M47 with a 20pdr though the M46 (at that time) wasn't really all that great
where did you get the picture of the fluttering flags from? 19:50 Union Flag upside down and both it and the Canadian flag not fully up the flag pole ( mast ). Seems like it is done deliberately(hmm)
I (the editor) got it from this website called BioLogos, no idea what the site is actually about but I just Google searched "US Canada UK Flag" and that was the first satisfactory picture I saw. There is no grand vexillology conspiracy.
How do you determine a Union Jack to be upside down? To my eyes, it's identical either way.
The is3 is a good looking tank
And you shouldn't hurt it
Damn Boy He THICC BOI
HECKIN chonkerino
Chongus maximus
That picture of a "Panther" at the 4 min mark looks like it's actually based on a Soviet T series tank (although I don't recognize those tracks). Does anyone know what it is?
It might be a T 34, T 44, or T 54 dressed up to look like a panther, due to the panthers road wheels look very similar to those previously mentioned tanks
Probably t 54/55, since ther eis a noticeable gap between the first roadwheel and the second, just like in the t 54.
Polish replica of Panther, The drivetrain and susp. with wheels and tracks are from license-made T-55. muzeumgryf.pl/en/
@@BOSs-1313 Exactly !
Please talk about the T-43 Medium Tank
Yes and t-34m
Hello Kalashnikov and Waffentrager,
While such articles are within our sights and within our scope, they are not currently in the works. You can add them to our Public Suggestion List and you can help by adding more sources (or other suggested articles)
docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1p0Ll9TITGDiF9_fdS-tv1797JBs0_-pB70ReE_kIRkE/edit#gid=1911430820
Also, in order to help us with illustrating and publishing, please do consider donating through Patreon or Paypal.
www.patreon.com/tankartfund
Paypal.me/tankartfund
Someone has to write those articles
@@pavelalexe9254 Yuri Pasholok did this. If you can read russian of course))
i don't think Stalin-7 would mind
Word is the British officer next to Patton at the parade were the west 1st saw the IS-3, the colour drained out his face, seeing this Patton said words to effect of aren't you glad we're on your side?
Part 2?
Cool vid ,and with the Korean war WW3 could have broken out if MacArthur got his way to nuke the Chinese it would have been a terrible thing. What if the Russians didn't care and even though secretly they where involved in the Korean war they didn't have as many nukes as America had at the time would they have gone ahead and pushed the button one wonders but I'm happy to be in this timeline though things could be better cough, cough, dam covid crap.
The Truman administration would NEVER have nuked china, BECAUSE, both the FDR and Truman administrations had maneuvered to put Mao in control of China, just as FDR had deliberately put Stalin in control of central and eastern Europe.
US also did not have enough nukes for important cities of USSR,let alone China and USSR.USSR's best option for nukes would be hitting the biggest and of highest importance targets in Europe,South Korea and perhaps Japan(still very limited number of targets,meaning only few key targets could be struck in those countries). Not to mention that delivering system was still based on bombers,further limiting the success of it. It would have been a truly an apocalypse non the less,as it would engulf the whole world without sparing anyone,far worse than WWII.
Can someoone please explain to me the logic of the naming of american tanks? It's T43, T95, M103, M3A1, M60, M1 Abrams. What the hell is going.
The "T" is for vehicles still undergoing the prototype and testing phases. The "M" is for vehicles that have been adopted and given a model number.
Jesus...
9:20 (its) not (it's).
Why is Judy doing videos on tanks? This is not the DLC we were expecting CDPR! I mean... it's fine... just bit unexpected.
It is an m103 it's gun is an 105M capable of penetrating the rear quite alot and can kxll the is-7
Slow talking rate down please
No way a girl likening tanks this is epic this a certified poggers dababy fortinite gone moment
Edit no girl I know likes tanks this much
the Is3 was a piece of junk
swallow the water before you talk please.... it's v v distracting
Wow.... story is WAY too dry