Sex Psychology - How Men and Women Mate Differently
Vložit
- čas přidán 19. 01. 2024
- To try everything Brilliant has to offer-free-for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/FictionBeast/ . The first 200 of you will get 20% off Brilliant’s annual premium subscription.
Support the channel
► Buy me a coffee: ko-fi.com/fictionbeast
► Get perks on Patreon: / fictionbeast
WHERE TO FIND ME:
► Website: fictionbeast.com
►Instagram: / fictionbeastofficial
►Tiktok: www.tiktok.com/@fictionbeast?...
► E-mail: fictionbeastofficial {at} gmail.com
► Audio Podcast: redcircle.com/shows/c101a9a1-...
"This video was sponsored by Brilliant"
#fictionbeast
#psychology
To try everything Brilliant has to offer-free-for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/FictionBeast/ . The first 200 of you will get 20% off Brilliant’s annual premium subscription.
Brainlets begging for citations in the comments when the guy litterally cites every book and authors in the fricking video, it's all so tiresome...
A woman wrote in her essay around the year 1000 A.D. that men were uncompassionate and didn't understand other people's feelings. 1000 years later, and forgive my presumption, the average man is just as good at relationships as women. The essay is translated as The Pillow Book.
There are limits to explaining the psychology of men and women from a biological perspective. You could make a three-hour video on the subject.
Men and women aren't any better or worse, they just fail in different ways. Men tend to over-rationalize and overanalyze what are essentially emotional processes, they often approach it with math and statistics (muh 80/20 rule bro). Women on the other hand often don't seem capable of realizing their gut feelings aren't always the best course of action. Most relationships I know are like slow-motion crashes that I know will fail, but so far nobody has ever listened to me. Even when I turn out right and the other person starts the same type of relationship, they think "this time will be different". On the other hand, the rare healthy relationship makes me pretty jealous, I have to admit.
@@kingkefa7130 Is it a cultural difference that the pattern of calculating women and men who are easily overwhelmed by emotions seems more typical? In any case, positive compromise is necessary for a lasting relationship.
@@kingkefa7130, me using maths and statistics when I failed Maths:
You’re the best CZcamsr for me .keep going professor ❤
Fantastic video well explained... ❤
Interesting and strangely I am not offended in any way 👀 thanks for sharing this with everyone, your videos are amazing; keep up the good work brother
Sir, can you make a video on Jiddu krishnamurthi &some indian philosopher's
20 mins. Never knew Sacha Baron Cohen was a famous British psychologist as well as a famous British comic actor 😂😂😂
26:30 this.
Hilarious how this is the only video where you're being asked for citations to be pinned in the comments. You have to subscribe to how their favorite youtubers do things or you are automatically disregarded.
It's interesting your analysis of topics draws from both science and literature. I come from a background of mostly philosophy and science, but your videos are making me realize just how much there is to learn from literature as well. Thank you for making the educational content.
The amount of money isnt exactly the condition. Its the competence and respect that matter more.
Take the queen of England's husband for example. He isnt the king for marrying the queen. But if a random lady marries a king then she becomes the queen.
Inb4 thumbnail is changed. The answer is yes, more instinct than brains. Read Schopenhauer - On Women
Bro, that man was a philosopher who died in 1860.
its not the instinctual process in the mind but the emotional one. Dont tell people to read when you dont even understand that instinct isn't of the brain
@angellover02171 cool story bro, but what's your point?
@@starc.Stop simping for women, it comes across as weak
@@kyle-7107 bro, they thought women had a wandering womb back then. Like they were still doing blood letting back then. Like maybe choose some sources from 1950 to now.
As evolutionary behaviour guiding us it might not be choosing the best. For example here men and women are acting in self-interest in mating without considering offsprings survival probability prior to mating this behaviour reflects in the concurrent problems as we are ignoring global challenges such as climate change and global warming which can impact badly on the offsprings of human species. In other words their default strategies at individual level seems short sighted and it's negetive impact will affect the species in the long run.
When you 'research' I think you should mention those in description.
Yes male embryos starts out as by having female genitalia then differentiate to male genitalia
23:46 I finally understand why my father was pushing me to have kids young. I told my father I’ll have kids at 35 and he said it’s ideal to have kids in mid 20s. Perhaps the environment he grew up in where it was rare for a young man to grow up past 20. A gang infested neighborhood.
Noticing a complete lack of citations in the descriptions
This ain't a college essay ffs
@jadonlawrence4909 yeah why make things easier for his audience.
Sponsored by 'Brillant' ❤
@@angellover02171He did give the book titles. Maybe you could read the books?
@@angellover02171 you are on the internet, a global public library. Do your own verification....
"Monogamous women" - LOL dream on.
Maybe in India!
😂😂😂😂 hypergamy is trending now days
@@vivekkaushik9508not any more
@@plmnjioqazzsw7962 Well, yeah, if I'm forced into a monogamous relationship so as not to die a slow and painful death, I'm going to make sure that one person is the best I can get.
Funny how monogamy nazis insist on ruining their own and everyone's love life. And then start pointing fingers and get rather bloodthirsty.
(Considering how obvious that is.)
@@plmnjioqazzsw7962 "Love is to obtain the exclusive property rights to another person's ass."
*Much synchronous yes-nodding and launching of cruise missiles*
m poor giv money for me life
The Body is an Animal.
"Most of what we are is non physical, though, our lowest form is physical. All life on our planet has the lowest form, the Body. Our Body is an Animal and the other type of Body on our planet is a Plant. Bodies are bound absolutely to Natural Law, which is the lowest form of true Law. Natural Law is a localised form of Law and is derived from the Laws of Nature. Natural Law is the finite and specific foundational control structure ordering the actions and interactions of species, members of species, and the material sources of a planet.
The lowest non physical form of what we are is the Mind, which is a Process. There are other forms of life on our planet that have both a Body and a Mind, however, so far as we currently know, there are no Plants and only some Animals that have a Body and a Mind. The lowest forms of Mind, Instinct and Emotion, are predominantly bound to Natural Law. The next higher form of Mind is Intellect which is bound predominantly to the Laws of Nature. Intuition, the highest form of Mind, can be bound or not to both Natural Law and the Laws of Nature separately or together, or to higher forms of Law altogether. Intuition is the truest guide for our Selves.
The next non physical form of what we are is the Self, which is an Awareness. There are relatively few other forms of life on our planet that have a Self. The Self is not bound to any form of Law other than One's Own Law. It is the only form of Law that cannot be violated.
The foundation of what we are is the highest non physical form of what we are. The highest form of what we are is the Being, which is an Existence. The Being is not bound to any form of Law originating within Existence. The Being is bound absolutely to The Law.
Existence, and the Laws of Nature which are the finite and specific foundational control structure ordering the actions and interactions of all elements within Existence, cannot Be without The Law being The Law.
So, what is The Law?
In a word, The Law is options.
Definition
option: a thing that is or may be chosen.
The word 'option' does convey the idea of The Law in its most basic sense but does not clarify all of what The Law is.
Free Will does describe how our species experiences The Law but does not convey all of what The Law is.
In clarifying what The Law is;
The capitalised form of the word 'The' indicates the following noun is a specific thing.
Law is the finite and specific foundational control structure ordering the actions and interactions of all elements subordinate.
Together, the words 'The' and 'Law' (in that exact order,) is a proper noun indicating;
the singular form of Law that all other forms of Law and all other Laws are founded upon,
the singular foundation upon which Existence is founded,
the singular foundation upon which Non Existence is founded,
the singular foundation connecting Existence to Non Existence,
the concept of options, and
Free Will.
However one thinks, believes, guesses, hopes, or "knows", whether by a Big Bang, a creation story, a computer program, an expansion of consciousness, or whatever means by which Existence could have come to Be, the option for Existence to not Be also exists. Existence and Non Existence, the original options connected by the very concept of options, connected by The Law. Outside of space and before time. Extra-Existential.
As we experience The Law in our Being,
The Law is Free Will.
The First Protector of The Law is Freely Given Consent.
The First Violation of The Law is Theft of Consent."
"Truth is always relative to the closed system it exists within. Existence is, in the strictest sense, a closed system. There are truths within existence that are true and there are truths within existence that are not true. Truth can only exist in a closed system and may or may not be true outside of that closed system, not therein. Truth is that which men and women convey through Voice and Word. One's offered truth may or may not be true. Truth and true are not the same word, and subsequently, truth and true are not the same thing. True is that which can be shown in words through at least one question and its exact answer. That which can be shown in words can subsequently be seen by all men and women.
In the closed system of the Catholic Church of four hundred years ago, the truth was that our planet was the centre of a geocentric planetary system. Galileo posited that our planet was a part of a heliocentric solar system and spent the last years of his life under house arrest as a consequence of going against the truth of the Church. The Church has since changed its truth to the heliocentric solar system model."
- Goho-tekina Otoko
That's total bs except the last part
@@jadonlawrence4909 do you have questions?
@@starc. Most of if not all the stuff you wrote doesn't make any sense. It's vague
@@jadonlawrence4909 yes a lot of it didn't all make sense to me either at first and I still dont understand every part entirely even after 8 years (if you noticed its a quote). One thing for sure though is its not vague but very exact.
Watch the vid at 1.5x and then thank me later
This video felt uninformed and oversimplified