3 Reasons WHY you wouldn't Kill the horse of a knight in battle
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 06. 2024
- Ever thought killing the horse of an enemy knight in battle would be the easiest way to get rid of an armoured knight? After watching this video will you still think that way?
A knight is a person granted an honorary title of knighthood by a monarch or other political leader for service to the monarch or country. During the High Middle Ages, knighthood was considered a class of lower nobility. By the Late Middle Ages, the rank had become associated with the ideals of chivalry. Often, a knight was a vassal who served as a fighter for a lord, with payment in the form of land holdings. Knighthood in the Middle Ages was closely linked with horsemanship (and especially the joust) from its origins in the 12th century until its final flowering as a fashion among the high nobility in the Duchy of Burgundy in the 15th century. This linkage is reflected in the etymology of chivalry, cavalier and related terms.
In the late medieval period, new methods of warfare began to render classical knights in armour obsolete, but the titles remained in many nations.
While the knight was essentially a title denoting a military office, the term could also be used for positions of higher nobility such as landholders. The higher nobles grant the vassals their portions of land (fiefs) in return for their loyalty, protection, and service. The nobles also provided their knights with necessities. The knight generally held his lands by military tenure which was measured through military service that usually lasted 40 days a year. Vassals and lords could maintain any number of knights, although knights with more military experience were those most sought after. A knight fighting under another's banner was called a knight bachelor while a knight fighting under his own banner was a knight banneret.
A knight had to be born of nobility - typically sons of knights or lords. In some cases commoners could also be knighted as a reward for extraordinary military service.
The seven-year-old boys were given the title of page and turned over to the care of the castle's lords. They were placed on an early training regime. Pages then become assistants to older knights in battle, carrying and cleaning armour, taking care of the horses, and packing the baggage. Older pages were instructed by knights in swordsmanship, equestrianism, chivalry, warfare, and combat (but using wooden swords and spears).
When the young boy turned 15, he became a squire. During this time the squires continued training in combat and were allowed to own armour (rather than borrowing it).
Squires were required to master the “seven points of agilities” - riding, swimming and diving, shooting different types of weapons, climbing, participation in tournaments, wrestling, fencing, long jumping, and dancing - the prerequisite skills for knighthood. All of these were even performed while wearing armour.
Upon turning 21, the squire was eligible to be knighted.
Follow me on my social networks:
/ themetatron
/ metatron_youtube
Metatron-153...
/ puremetatron
/ realmetatron
Royalty free music by Epidemic Sound:
intro ES_Knights Templar 1 - Johannes Bornlöf
intro 2 ES_Medieval Adventure 01 - Johannes Bornlöf
outro ES_Knights Templar 2 - Johannes Bornlöf
Check out the facebook page of the photographer who works with me, he has lots of fantastic pictures
amedeo.capor...
and his instagram
amedeo.capor...
Check out my friend Salvo's channel
/ @littlesalvo000
Obviously killing the horse triggers a cutscene where the Knight absorbes his horse’s power.
do you think real life works like dark souls?
@@mariomaiorano1859 It does!
@@mariomaiorano1859 pls hand your internet license to the nearest authority, your incapability of processing sarcasm has forced us to take this step. You can regain your license and thereby the right to comment by successfully finishing a humor rehabilitation course in a local ERP certified establishment.
@@stormsoul3162 bro I was also joking lmao
@@mohandasjung I wish😩
"The wind" is the medieval version of blaming lag
Based and souka-pilled.
"Twas the wind Knave..."
omg God nerf wind pls
@@Verlasian More like "God fix the servers!"
Its always the Wind ... the wind or the Goblins ....
I'm a member of a Civil War Reenactment group. Many times we've fought mock combat, both mounted and dismounted. Even in mock battles knowing that you won't be killed, it's hard to face a mounted charge without trying not to bolt. The temptation is overwhelming. What many people don't realize is that a horse/equine can cover ground very quickly, measured in seconds.
Imagine a line of men charging you, screaming and yelling, firing weapons, often 4 to 8 pistols, along with a couple of sawed-off shotguns, all coming at you at an incredible speed. You hear the pounding of their hooves and feel it in the ground through your feet, spelling your DOOM! it's very nerve-racking. In ancient warfare, it was even more profound as along with the above, there was banging & clashing of weapons, men screaming death wails, accompanied by the unmistakable smell of fresh blood and bowels. Truly overwhelming!
Just imaging a modern Battelfield, a german Leopard A7 Battletank charges you directly, even with some sort of small Anti-Tank Weapon like a LAW or an RPG etc, you are knowing, you need a (very) Lucky hit to do more than just scratch it's Paintings, you will run - thats exactly what medieval Infantryman experienced when Knights charged: an nearly unstoppable State of the Art Killing machine, best avaiable and expensive Technic of their time, trained at best for just killing them if they do not run
plus they wernt used to that large gatherings of people so the first time you see 1000 people , 200 on horses 200 shooting bows at you and 600 charging you ,all trying to murder you
@Björn Herzog the new US Abrams is state of the art. Not even close.
During the filming of, IIRC, a napoleon movie, the actors actually fled from a horsecharge out of character because they were genuinely routed.
Jesus loves you
11:56 I read that when they filmed "Breavhart" they had dificulties to make the extras stay in line while riders and horses aporached them to simulate a charge. THEY KNEW it was fake, and that the riders would stop before reaching them, and even so they couldn´t hold the line.
Now imagine this was seriuos.........I think I would have run.
ever heard of switzerland? :-)))
@@bernhardwidmer886 No.
@@The_ZeroLine that is a serious lack of knowledge
@@bernhardwidmer886 What’s “knowledge?”
I think he's referencing swiss pikemen and their effectiveness in holding the line against cavalry charges.
Now I constantly imagine a knight training the sword while I enjoy things
Ahahahahah
Tristan Ich And when your enjoying more things he's enjoying more better than you.
And while he is charging at you, he is imagining you having fun at the tavern while he was training the sword. Imagine his blood lust.
@@owo5869 he probably has sex with Jennifer right now
it.....
it haunts me.....
Lived near a stable when I was younger, one of the horses broke it's leg in a paddock about a km away from our house. The shrieking it produced still haunts me. Wouldn't want to experience that on a large scale.
Horses do have a strange body-to-leg proportion that seems to suggest a high risk of that.
#1 reason: a war horse could be worth ten years of their salaries.
Yes, I was also thinking that the value of the horse would be one of the reasons
@@ericscire Those medieval folk were all about loot and ransoming.
@Parvonik the leaders on the field are often thinking about things like this.
Thats just foolish to believe. Yes, those horses were worth a lot, but as Metatron said, when the knights charge, you are likely in the worst scenario you could ever imagine finding yourself in. It is utterly ridiculous to assume, that even for a second one would think of spoils, profit, or gain in that case. Your brain shuts down and you rely entirely on instincts. The only thing that matters is how you will get out of this alive and with all your limbs in place.
@@woodys9841 you would think that but in modern and ancient warfare money was always a concern for leadership. Yes the individual war fighters might say screw it but those cases are the minority.
When you were training the sword, he was training the sword
Without joking though, that detail is actually pretty big. A lot of people don't realise that the thought you have put into stuff like this, or the training you have had, is not much different from what most others have had in the same span of time.
A modern example would be video games. Try to compare PvE content to PvP. It's easy enough to theory craft a strategy against the AI, but implementing it vs real people is another thing. And even then there is comparing low-level PvP to high-level PvP.
More like "when you were training the short sword for the first time, he had been training with a longsword since he was able to walk"
@@barbiquearea Nah, the longsword is heavy for a toddler. THAT came later. When he was able to walk, the first training, it was something like the Roman Gladius, or Frodo's Sting. And the weawy fi'tht timeth - with a wooden training sword.
Conversely, competitive players often have a hard time playing the campaigns for the first time, at least on higher difficulties. Campaigns require a different play style than 1v1 matches. Eventually however, their ability to formulate a working strategy lets them steamroll missions.
Constantine XI
The only thing that will really stop a knight is another knight going in the opposite direction.
*teleports behind you* “While you were smashing Jennifer, I was studying the blade”
While also smashing Jennifer ;)
@@StudlyFudd13 smashing Jennifer with the sword
@@LautaroRRIos Both swords right?
Official winner!
@@MeshuggahDave. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 that's my aunt tho but still funny as hell😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
The horse was also considered to be a spoil of war. A infantry grunt could use a horse on his plot of land to plow and haul heavy things to clear more land for planting.
i highly doubt a medieval levy would get their hands on a full on war horse let alone use if for plane old field work. if it were me at least, i’d sell it.
@@irisallender6796 Spoils of war figured out to be who got to what first. A plow horse would be priceless for a infantry footman's plot of land. He'd sell his wife and kids before parting with that horse. Also many a poor Knight also had to use his horse to plow his fields. Not everybody who had a title actually had heaps of money. Armies didn't get paid to fight as they do now. What you could snatch from someone's home is what you got paid with. That's what Pillaging ment.
Or also eaten, by Napoleon’s starving army 😽
@@susandolan9543Sell the war horse, buy a cheaper farm horse, drink the difference.
Something extremely valuable like that would likely "go in the pool" so to speak, a communal pot of goods which the units quartermaster would then distribute out based on rank and performance. Although someone capturing a war horse would almost certainly get a bonus for doing so the horse itself would likely be paid out to a knight, with priority to any one who actually *did* get their horse killed out from under them.
I'm thinking another thing to consider is that the horse is coming at you at high speed. even if you manage to kill it, the thing would still be coming at you and there is a high chance you'd be crushed by the combined weight and momentum of the horse and the armoured knight falling on you.
Yea logical 🙂🙂
While you were on the toilet
He was training the sword
While you were watching Fortnite dance
He was training the sword.
M'lady
I wonder, will the sword ever complete its training?
@@Nerobyrne While you were training the sword
He was training the very sword. He will kill you by just asking the sword to hit you
When you are killing the enemy
He was training the sword
The moral of the story:
If you think you're going to kill Sir Lancelot, you're going to have a very bad knight.
Hey that's the tweaker from aqua teen.
Hehe, they don't call me Sir Lance a lot for nothin
lancelot was basically a french fan fiction of the original myths/histories
8:35 - The other big factors at Agincourt were not the amount of English archers and their dense formation. But also the dense formation of the French. Hence English 'arrow storm' was almost always going to hit something.
an 'easy' win for the french and plenty (including Harry) to ransom.....ooops!
The best way to kill a knight was to have a wench give him syphilis!
or water to drink.
@Martin the Warrior so many weapons of mass destruction in those days.
There was no syphilis in medieval Europe.
Im quite certain Syphilis is an American disease, pal.
The middle ages ended with the discovery of the Americas so it doesn't check out.
@@cetus4449 They had other diseases, though.
"It's all written in this book you can't read"
In ROMAN! (lets hope it was times new roman) ;))
I swear, it was in that article online I can't fight anymore! It was really there!
I do, however, believe Mettatron more with that than my groupmates for a project.
That was my university life in nutshell
Well Arial wasn't invented until 1982 and most people find Times New Roman more visually appealing anyway..
It's been tested and all.
$1000% legit
You forgot one thing:
If the knight does recover from the fall...
He'll be *PISSED*
He is probably not able to get up. Stunned by the fall and the armour is so heavy that he can not stand up without help.
@@yesyesyesyes1600 armor is not as heavy as you think, to a knight that is essentially his second skin especially when he's been training.
@@godsfavoursunday9933 I heard different things in Zeughaus Graz Styria (the biggest armory of medieval weapons in Europe). A knight lying on the ground is dead meat if nobody helps him up. But hey if I am wrong it is also okay for me :)
@@yesyesyesyes1600 czcams.com/video/qzTwBQniLSc/video.html
You might want to change your mind
@@RyujinNoKami maybe
But these are replicas and not historical armors, right?
10:28 Your horse language pronunciation is perfect, it almost sounds like a native lol
Lmao
He's a natural. I bet all the mares follow him around the stable.
xD
"Why kill a noble beast for the quarrels of silly men?"
Cuz I'm fucking starving...
@@MrChase115 Found the German soldier from 1917.
Thou hath spoken the truth :)
The horse counts. You don't.
"Noble beast" is a weird concept that requires discussion.
Dont kill the horse, trip it and then steal it. Then *BRAVELY* run away.
´´Brave , brave, brave, brave sir Robin``
My friend tried this with my horse.
*My horse put him right into the intensive care.*
edit: simply put, horses can be loyal sons of horses
then eat the horse after
@@andreimarcusmerced4152 How is that funny? That's just cruel.
@@juanvasquez2315 are you a vegan bro? seriously if you eat livestock then what makes horse meat different.
But horses die with their riders. We know that since Age og Empires.
Except from the new unique unite , namely the konnik
"Horatio I am dead. Thou livest. Report me and my cause aright to the unsatisfied !"
- 🐕
Also, thanks to movies, we tend to imagine that by stabbing enemies they just die. That's not how it works. Instant ko can only be obtained by striking the head or the heart, and even in the second case the heart leaves you some 10-20 seconds of activity before you drop dead. I have seen bulls at the Spanish corrida getting stabbed with swords a ton of times and still charging.
My husband was a soldier and he did wonder how he'd really perform when the shtf. Then he went overseas. After witnessing a few atrocities (that really jacked him up), seeing what was done to the family of one of his local contacts, and what was DONE to one of his local contacts, he got over it. He very much wanted to kill the enemy.
But it took a lot to awaken a bloodlust in this regular man. Nobody walks into war really understanding it. We can't imagine it until we've witnessed it for ourselves. Even for my husband, it wasn't the sights that got to him. He'd seen enough movies. It was the damn smell. The smells are what made it all real and that changed him.
Smell is very emotional as we know. It triggers the memory more than sight.
The studies he's referencing have a lot of problems. I dont recall a great deal about it b/c I only looked into it a little bit, but its doubtful it was as big of an issue that its made out to be here.
Thank you and your Husband for your service to the United States.
If you aren't American, then nvm.
@@taylorjensen2787
Wtf even is this comment.
@@Alias_Anybodya meaningless platitude often recited to soldiers
People often forget that, not only was the Knight trained, the horse the Knight is riding was specially trained, too. And it would be wearing its own armor to boot.
Remember that in battles of knights v knights, the horses would STILL be running towards lots of pointy things aimed at them, called lances, as well as at other horses, both of which were moving right at them. War horses were trained NOT to stop or shy away
The armor that you see on horses pictured here was of the LATER period, and much of it was mostly for parade, rather than combat. An EARLIER war horse, if it had armor at all, would have a headpiece and chest protector made of boiled leather
Historical sources have it that horse armor was only issued if you ponied up for the DLC.
@@magicAAA I was looking for this.
Massive horse armour was most likely only used for tournaments and parades. It would be much too heavy to use on campaigns and battles. In battle, the horses would probably wear no or very limited armour.
Thick armor on both horse and knight ya your in trouble
Any strategy that assumes a passive opponent isn't a strategy. It's a daydream.
people should watch more ufc and the interviews they have before hand. you have a perfect plan till you get punched in the face.
@@lilslavboi2171
Such a tired meme. Tyson had plans. He prepared for fights. Having a plan and preparing for your opponent is what every successful fighter does.
The problem is *bad* plans.
@@lilslavboi2171 The more accurate statement I’ve found is everyone has a plan until they get hot with a high single leg and are now on their back. A situation where 98% of humans apparently are entirely unprepared to be in.
Damn that peasant was punching well above his weight with Jennifer lol.
"WHY you wouldn't Kill the horse of a knight in battle"
Swiss Pikemen: Say that again, but Slowly.
Swiss Pikeman are a highly specialised unit. They were a trained, paid and elite unit. He is talking about pikeman in the general sense, and even the Swiss could be outflanked when using long pole-arm. It is the same as you comparing the Swiss with a proper phalanx from the Greek period where the lances were gigantic in length.
@@Sunderas this is why you need these badass to kill every knight in Europe, except the Mongols who would just shoot from a distance.These swiss stood toe to toe with the Marauding Landsknecht in rome and did a awesome last stand defense before was overrun as you said. Mounted and foot fears them this is why they are the exception.
@@Sunderas They became highly specialized unit later. In their first few battles with Habsburg they were just common farmers who were trying to defend their land and sovreignity. While trying to solve the issue they came up with Halbred as it used less metal and it was very effective strategy against the knights with their comparitively shorter lances.
People who say "I'll JUST do..." have never actually done anything outside of fantasy play
But neither have people who say "People who say...".
@@kleinmeisterlein The former are annoying, cringe inducing fools, the latter are not ;)
@@kleinmeisterlein I've seen people say claymores are made to cut through armour like butter. These knuckleheads think wielding a big ass chunk of metal is realistic and historically accurate. I'll let you decide whether the latter or former are stupid.
I'll just grab an ak and rocket jump to mars while simultaniously doing back flips then shoot the horse from outer space and dodge cosmic radiation
@@eeelaina5588 Exactly, I'll just grab the Infinity Gauntlet and snap the enemies out of existence.
medieval combat guide:
1. get a spear
2. profit
Spears are the best form of melee weapon
Until you realize a spear is unwieldy and you have not trained with the spear properly and that shit gets yanked out of your hands or deflected by a buckler or you aimed for the limbs like a moron and they got past the business end of the spear.
@Bostan Liviu Good luck landing a proper shield bash on someone who is moving on their feet.
@Bostan Liviu Well in formation shield and spear, distance is very important.
wars are generally fought in formations.
@@tarantulathree-one8013 "not trained with the spear properly"
Doesnt this apply to every weapon ? Isnt that a non argument ?
Reason Number 3 is a VERY valid one. So much so that its the exact reason why the military began using Human shaped targets in their training of soldiers to shoot and use bayonets. And by doing so they noticed that more soldiers were less likely to hesitate shooting someone and it made it easier for them to simply consider another person as nothing more then simply a target if they got them use to shooting the human form, to recognize a human shape as the target/enemy. And they continue to do this to this very day as when I was in basic training ALL of our target where of exact size as a human torso.
Also, killing a charging horse with a sword or spear or any melee weapon there is a huge chance of you snapping your wrist, breaking your arm (both o which would lead to you dropping your weapon and being screwed) and even if you managed to kill it, it doesn't jus stop, it tumbles and falls at a high speed and if you didn't evade enough before you attacked it, there is a good chance it will just fall on you and crush you
Nothing makes a knight more excited than a broken line
How about a maiden's broken dress?
A broken line of running people is basically free kills.
Except maybe for Jennifer.
Sigurd Torvaldsson not every line will be broken though so it won’t be that easy. Lines get broken almost all the time it’s just how long you can hold them
@@bobrosser1101 yes, but undoubtedly a lot easier than the maintained line, thus the excitement.
It's really hard to imagine just how intimidating a big horse bearing down on you is unless you've been there. I've only been in reenactments, a couple of demos and on the edge of a racetrack. It's bloody terrifying and you just want to run or hug the ground. I can barely imagine hundreds of them charging you then you have the knights on top of them. How anyone stood there ground against that is amazing to me.
Exactly. A horse is a big and powerful animal that can easily trample and squish a human being, no matter how big or strong the latter is.
Due to actual pyhsics, you only have to stop the horse in front of you. Then you are not trampled. That wouldn´t protect you from any lances of the other knights going past you where your buddies went of running. I say, I´d be a lot more scared of the lances then of the horses, but I have worked with animals a lot. Don´t forget that people at that time were used to working with animals, not so much working with (or rather against) lances and knights.
Especially if you weren't familiar with a horse or knew to stand your ground. The Spanish would use this in the Americas: the native peoples had no familiarity with it. Like Romans against Pyrrhus' elephants, they would run rather than risk getting tramples. Unlike the Romans, they weren't given enough time to develop counter tactics until it was too late.
Why not ride cattles in combat then?
@@hugus800 what does your question relate to? obviously horses work better. I am sure people have been testing these things.
Infantryman: *kills horse*
Knight after standing up: "Ohhh laddie" *draws sword* "you've done it now..."
Yeah that is if the knight gets up. Pending how the horse stopped the knight would have a good chance of being fucked. If it did run into thick, braced spears, the abrupt stop of the horse would send the rider flying behind enemy lines and hitting the ground really hard if the enemy lines didn't break his fall, and people die all the time from falling off a horse but this knight was just thrown at like 30mph-40mph from a charging horse, his armor would help soften the impact but he is still at high risk. Aside from probable injuries from being thrown if not out right dead already, he is now on the ground surrounded by enemy soldiers stabbing him in every joint. Dead knight is dead. If the horse slows down trying to stop, gets stabbed and rears up then falls over, well now there is a very good chance the knight's leg is pinned under the horse and broken (possibly with the horse failing causing more pain and injury). Unable to move the knight either gets trampled by other horses or stabbed because he is pinned and can't move or fight back.
@@Zankaroo I'm assuming if the horse is armored the only way to take it down as its charging you is to go for the legs by either cutting one clean off or simply placing your weapon in its path matador style, in which case it will fall out from underneath him, putting him into a somersault or a roll(as long as it doesn't flip over entirely), both of which are relatively safe. The weight of all he has on will keep him from being flung such a long distance as any normal rider would, as well as protecting him from the brunt of the impact like you mentioned, so when he gets up he won't be too happy with you.
@@xcritic9671 He would still be a row or two deep surrounded by enemy who most likely started beating or stabbing as soon as he hit the ground.
@@Zankaroo this is an assumed instance where its just one knight and one guy(you), otherwise you're talking a full cavalry charge and a full line of infantry and it would be nearly impossible to get away with those variables.
As I have pointed out. We know for a fact that it was common for a knight to be out and out killed when his horse went down. A king of Poland died when his horse rolled over onto him.
Another reason to not kill the horse is because war horses were very expensive and it was very advantageous to capture them.
At the Battle of Crécy, quite a few horses died. This from Wikipedia: "Philip himself was caught up in the fighting, had two horses killed underneath him, and received an arrow in the jaw"
people focus fire on princes and I think metatron was talking 1 on 1
I knew you were multilingual, dude, but I didn't know you could speak horse!
I'm fluent in horse, but that sounded more like Mule to me. :-P
Mr. Ed was fluent in English, so it shouldn't be surprising.
@@averagejo1626 Yup,sounded like Ass to me.
We've all spoken hoarse a time or two....
Name one of his learned languages
plus, those horses are bloody valuable, a friend of mine trains horses, and she told me that a knight's warhorse was heavily trained and selected, so capturing one would make you rich.
(hoping that your superiors don't take all the merit...)
it's like a equivalent of a sports car back then
You don't get to keep it. The commander pools the loot and doles out shares.
It's just like modern times, you do all the hard work and your boss takes all the credit and the money. He MIGHT buy you a beer thougn if you're lucky 😜😜
@White-Van Helsing you aint never been to a paddock then. A lot have ppl have been killed or maimed by ornery horses. They warn you first to back off, but if you dont they kick harder than Hollie Holmes on Rowdy's face.
Well agree back in medieval times Hores was basically like a car about 2-3 decades ago(nowadays it's not that much of a luxury good really) a luxury that had a lot of utility, but still was expensive as hell to get and maintain, so bet that probably a typical grunt would prefer to knock knight off horse (what could be still hard thing but bit easier especially with polearms) and just keep horse for self, for transport or maybe even combat
When I was young, I used to always walk on the side of the road adjacent to oncoming traffic. This way, I imagined, I would easily just run up the hood of any swerving car and jump safely over it. This is like the medieval equivalent of that delusion. Lmao
I thought it was common knowledge to walk on the side of oncoming traffic
@@cptjohnbhewler1529 It is. But it's so you can spot cars that may be veering towards you, not so you can jump over them.
@@Hypernefelos Sherlock Holmes over here. Who said anything about jumping over cars?😂
@@cptjohnbhewler1529 The person we're both replying to 7 months after the fact :P
Why!
I never stopped to think which way the traffic goes. It will haunt me now
As a combat vet, thank you Metatron for bringing up reason #3 - this is almost universally overlooked.
Most weapons and tactics in war rely upon psychological factors over the physical ones. Killing the enemy is the byproduct, defeating them is the intent. If all the high caliber, high explosive, hate and discontent one side is throwing at the other causes not a single enemy casualty, but makes the enemy too scared to react or causes the enemy to flee, then the intent has been achieved hasn’t it?
That’s why the American army has bred shooting the enemy to be a reflex rather than a decision. We’ve taught the reflex, but not how to deal with it after, which has destroyed so many lives. Awful.
Hold *TF UP*
IS NO ONE PAYING ATTENTION THE FACT THAT HE SHAVED BEFORE REASON 1
Edit fail!!!!...what a noob!!!
Oh my God!
Gh... gh...
GHOST BEARD! 😨😱
I mean he was also wearing a metal chest piece and different clothes, I don't think he was trying to be subtle about it lol.
While he was explaining, the knight was training the sword by shaving him
Oh...
william: we'll make spears. twice as long as a man.
hamish: some men are longer than others.
campbell: your mother been telling ya stories about me again, eh?
Hamish: “when you say ‘your island’ - you mean Ireland?”
Irish guy: “Yeah! ... it’s *mine.”*
Reasons why metric system is better than imperial system...
Brave heart
@@Inquisitor_Vex It's even more funny knowing the actor playing the Irish guy is actually Scottish and Brendan Gleeson playing hamish is actually Irish 👍🏻
this was also the first thing that came to my mind. I started wondering whether anyone ever successfully pulled the "surprise" pike trick in history. My guess is no, since the enemy would see you carrying a bunch of pikes when you move into battle formation. I don't remember how they pull it off in Braveheart.
Thank you for giving such a detailed video. The psychological part is so often overlooked. Most of these farm-boy medieval infantry would be fricking terrified at the advance of the cavalry. Whether it's medieval knights or BC steppe nomads, a non-disciplined, amateur soldier was pissing himself while he non-consciously decided to fight or flee.
farmers typically had pretty good discipline also consider how everyone back then lived MUCH more communally than today so were probably used to working as groups
13:03 the terribly accurate accents made me lose it hahahahahaha
Word XD
this one is gold xD
I instantly imagined the soldier looking like Baldrick from the Black Adder.
@@Holtijaar prefect!
The officer sounds like Alfie from the Peaky Fookin' Bloinders
As Sir Michael Tyson famously said "everyone has a plan until they get lanced in the mouf"
I also like his other quote, "I broke my back. Thpinal"
As someone else said: "Run thru a mothafukka face - they you don have to worry bout em no mo"
"Lanthed"
Theory before I watch: Because horses were high priority loot?
No, that's not it. You can't loot a knight's horse if you get killed by the knight.
Ding Ding Ding.
@HJ bangerter Not "War" horses. They were the most expensive thing on the battle field.
@@needparalegal Well there are tales of people eating their war horses out of desperation. The siege of Antioch for example of the first crusade. Yes, they were expensive, but no cost is high enough for your survival.
@@woodys9841 LOL, logic is not your thing. People turn to cannibalism when they are starving, doesn't mean the people they ate were cheap....
What if you have buckets of apples all over the battlefield? The horses will get distracted and you can take them out of the equation.
Unfortunately so would the infantrymen
the equine equation
"Remember, shoot the man, not the horse. Dead horse is cover, live horse is a great pile of panic."
-- Brett Matthews, Firefly episode "Heart of Gold"
Someone 1000 years in the future: "So ez beat the SAS i see where the gun pointing and dodge then quickdraw headshot him"
So very accurate, everyone thinks it would be easy to take out elite warriors for some reason. They tend to forget that these people have been training for combat and/or have been in combat for a good portion of their lives.
To be fair, that is likely a verbatim post already....
Honestly I could take a Knight IF, AND ONLY IF I were allowed to use my own modern weapons.
The Knight charges, I point my gun and shoot.
General Shepard did that!
@@jorenvanderark3567 you would need armor piercing rounds.
SMGs won't work. Rifles maybe. But with AP rounds 100 percent
While you reading and rplying the comment,
He was training the sword
15:34 I'm given to understand this is also one of the things that separated pilots who became aces from other pilots during the 1st and 2nd World Wars. You have to keep your head about you, but there is apparently also a certain willingness and intent to kill for the pilot to actually go for the shots too.
Modern armed forces have mostly gotten through that by training, but that wasn't a thing in the 40's.
Thats the main factor to this day.
A critical factor so few talk about even know. It took advanced study of how soldiers behave and then specific psychological based training to get soldiers to try and kill. They found that less than 10% of American WWII infantry tried to actually kill someone.
When you're talking about how the horse will not commit suicide by impaling itself on a pike, it reminded me of the many times I've seen human soldiers do exactly that, in these wild, uncoordinated, mixed up battles where enemy soldiers mixed in with each other about a hundred yards deep. NO WAY that happened very often. Even the most capable and heroic soldier could be easily killed by a blow from behind in that scenario. Casualties would have been annihilating on both sides. IT always irritates me in a medieval battle scene where everyone acts like berserkers and no one works together or cares a whit for their own lives. Stupid.
What happens when you kill the horse but still have to fight an elite warrior trained to decapitate you since boy hood
Iron man can not run as fast as ya, you don't have so much weights...But running away in front of your officers will be punished... with death
@@withastickangrywhiteman2822 Plate. Armour. Does. Not. Slow. You. Down.
@@mathias3721 Carry 20 KG of sand bag on your back and see if you can still running faster than me. Knights were fast because of Horse. there was a time British long bowmen crushed French Knights, their horses were killed and knights got captured by longbow-men.
@@withastickangrywhiteman2822 Agincourt was mostly won due to the muddy terrain, it was also not JUST English yeomen, the English also had infantry and cavalry. Also, it's not a backpack, the weight is distributed over your entire body making it a lot easier to carry. AND knights were trained to fight IN armour, so it was barely a hindrance. A modern soldier carries more weight than a Medieval knight as well as having the weight mostly distributed in a backpack making it more cumbersome
@@mathias3721 No matter what you said, carrying 20 KG or wear clothes that heavy you simply can not outrun me. Unless i'm an daily American with 300 pounds of meat. LOL
"I'd just kill the knight" is the medieval equivalent of saying "I'd just pepper spray his leg"
But...people did kills knights
@@PoppaPlacidPenis and i put pepper spray on a burrito. Lets all move on from this.
@@PoppaPlacidPenis Yeah, people whose lives were spent (and in very high numbers lost) at war, not tryhards sitting in front of a screen with (generally speaking) not a single second of fighting experience.
@@PoppaPlacidPenis yes people did kill knights. But what they would probably say to you is not to be overconfident when fighting an athletic man who is has been trained since infancy clad in full plate armour with a weapon designed for war. And people who did kill a Knight would never, ever, say “I’d just kill the Knight!”.
@@PoppaPlacidPenis but people back then would rather caught and ransomed them.
“Phew, I killed his horse. Now he is done for!”
Objective: Survive
“Huh?”
I would like to add that war horses were bred to be big (Carry own armor and Carry a fairly large rider and their armor) and trained to be resilient against physical attacks even obeying their rider under a hail of fire arrows (the same would usually cause elephants to go run amok and sometimes trample friendly troops).
A knights horse was likely to have a coat of mail armor on top of soft inner armor, down to just above it's knees, allowing the horse to gallop but making it nearly impossible to hurt the animal to the extent that it can no longer physically function.
Wasn’t many western countries were fallen by the Mongolian? Who said that heavy cavalry is indestructible ?
@@cheungfranklin3543 Nobody said heavy cavalry was invincible. Most Mongolia has a population of 3.5 mil, so their success was meh in the end.
"...And that includes Jennifer, unless he is a Templar, if he sticks to the rules that is" :'D hahaha
You are funny ofc almost (except the real really old high masters) all of them broke that rule
I couldnt stop laughing when he said "that includes Jennifer"
If he is a templar he probably prefers you over Jennifer...
...and this makes the Pope angry.
@@xaquko9718 yeah the pope prefers them far younger
TL;DR
Stop procrastinating! You could be training the sword!
Damn it henry
But what about my date tonight with Jennifer?
While you were reading this comment, I was training the sword.
But..Goddamit, to write this comment I had to drop my sword!
While you are training the sword
HE was training the sword
*Damn it jennifer*
Gonna train the sword and drink some ale, AND NOT CRY IN THE CORNER.
Humorous and very entertaining video! Awesome job! Love the grunt training scene xD
So, it turns out Jennifer is a slapper.
10:22 that's why experienced knights used really depressed horses.
LOL
made my day
How do you tell if it's depressed? Do you offer the horse coffee and cigarettes to see if it takes them?
most horses where blind folded and trained to run/gallop with the blindfold.
even today "peasants" use a type of blind fold that let's the horse only see forward(he can still turn his/her head around though) so they go straight and only start turning when you pull him/her too.
cavalry is formed by the horse AND human, doesnt make sense only the human or knight to be trained.
Ahahahaha dude :D
The reason cavalry in movies use swords more often than any other weapon is simple. It arguably looks way cooler than "long pointy stick"
The lance is pretty fucking cool lookin' though. Not the plain ones that lesser knights had. The really expensive ones with ornaments and shit. That look awesome.
I'd take long pointy stick any day over a sword you just stab from like way over there
The problem with pole weapons on horseback like lances and spears is that they easily become stuck in your opponent and you have very little time to retrieve it. Even sticking a sword in a body can be very difficult to retrieve after lunging at a gallop. Hacking and slashing weapons are simply easier to retain, whereas pole weapons are essentially one shot deals. I've been a cavalry reenactor of multiple periods for 13 years, since I was 13 years old and I've been riding my entire life, and I can't even retain a lance after the first blow. Either you ditch the lance or you're pulled from the saddle.
@@Jake_Steiner yea I always thought how you dont fall after someone is impaled because I bet with armour on and one hand holding the steer thing for the horse and one holding a big heavy pole that now also have a fully sized human on it probably also in some sort of armour luke how do can you keep one hand holding it theres atleast like 80-90 kg if it was light poles with a few on your back which you can ditch after a hit I'd get it but how the fuck did it work
Dark souls pvp Pike bois: "you mock me?"
Actually very often horse's eyes were covered, so they don't get scared. Trained horse needs just the ruler. In some cases they were even tight together with a chain/rope to keep the order of the attack.
Completely covered, including the horse's view of what's in front of it as it charges? That doesn't seem like a good idea.
@@adrianmizen5070 Yes, completely.
You go ahead and run blindfolded, even if you are pressured into it. Moreover, the horse doesn't know what obedience or threats are and thus won't do anything dangerous.
This was somewhat later, but if you read the Florida of the Inca,
de Soto's march through Florida, you will see that they had a serious
problem with losing horses. One bowman sheltered under a tree and
defended himself against mounted horsemen rather well.
One drove his arrow so deep into a horse that it went through
the chest cavity into the guts. Then he asked for another horse,
claiming he could shoot an arrow even further.
Solider: YEEEES! I killed his horse...
...[sound of dead horse falling on mediveal solider]...
Probably hitting multiple soldiers.
[sound of fellow soldiers' judging stares because you killed a poor beautiful horse]
Filip Kafka [the stare of the now extremely pissed knight in full plate armor and armed to the teeth]
@@laytenci "oh man! You've really done it now!"
"What? I killed his horse so that his height and reach advantage are diminished. "
"Yeah, but now the knight wants you dead!"
"Wait, the knight didn't want me dead a second ago when he was charging at me with a Lance?"
"Well, yeah, but now he's angry and wants to kill you."
I don't understand how this stupid argument is going around still as it's completely devoid of any sort of critical thinking. He's an enemy knight. Killing his horse is just step one of taking down a deadly threat of you're infantry. It's difficult, so most couldn't pull it off alone, but infantry are rarely alone whereas knights often are.
Dana Gray knights don’t charge alone, regardless of how armed they are because that would be suicide. by the time he reaches the fray and his horse has been downed most likely his company will be right with him. and if it’s a pikemen or something similar that killed his horse than the pikemen’s in trouble. The knight’s now most likely in close range and in the optimal distance for his weaponry. the situation is madly in the favor of the knight
I just spent 17:21 watching this video when I could have been training the sword
And all this time that knight is still boning Jennifer.
The video is 17:22, you still have one second.
Get to it idler.
This channel is amazing, thanks!!
The most effective option, instead of killing the horse, is The Joestar Family secret technique passed down through the generations.
@KillBot 227 it’s just a joke don’t take it seriously, it’s a JoJo reference.
@KillBot 227 No! JoJo’s Bizarre Adventure.
@KillBot 227 No! JoJo’s Bizarre Adventure is an anime.
Also, good luck dodging a freaking *wall* of horses charging at you.
Haha
Dark Souls taught me I just need to roll
A wall of horses that are not skittish, but trained as well as the knight in obeying and trusting the knight. The hunting of Boar, Wolves, and Bear could be more dangerous than the average battle. No knight would take a horse into battle that had shown any tendency toward skittishness or disobedience in stressful conditions, and knights could afford to be picky...
Not to mention the knights would spend a good deal of their training on horse back, learning to control it with the slightest leg or body movement causing a corresponding movement from the horse. And I've herd some knights were known to be closer and more connected with their horses than with their wives.
Unless of course you have a wall of pikes that they won't charge at
@@madmun376 - Hey, in that case dodging wouldn't help either;)
"The horse says you go jump in the ravine which in horse language is neeiigghh" I'M CRYING 😂😂
Yeah, and very likely that horse would catapult rider down the ravine' Like you want to go there? Lemme help you with that bub
I must always get the suicidal horses in BF1
Such a knowledgeable and well-thought-out presentation. Thk U so very much!!!!!
Thank you for this very informative video ! Cool Job 👌🏻!
He also didn't mention that well off knight had horse armor o.o
Yah but they had to pay 3$ to Bethesda, which was alot of money in that time period.
@@CDNShuffle or sum mods from the nexus and make the horse breathe fire
Horse armor for 2.50$?!
Or at least a gambeson that was better than the one used buy our example peasant.
That’s called a catapgtachs or whatever
They are human tanks and they really existed
And it’s not a goofy ass game mod..
When Jenifer was playing with your sword, he was training the sword
and also training his other meat sword
@@butterskywalker8785 With your mom.
@@brandonhey7797 haha he you commit funny haha
@@brandonhey7797 heheheheh another funne mom joke
@@brandonhey7797 woah ur mom jokes are so 2012 bro grow up
Great video, really cool presentation, very factual and a few good laughs to boot. Awesome.
I thoroughly enjoyed this video. Thank you
let me just stop it at 1:57 and get a haircut and continue recording at 2:05
And a shave, don't forget the shave.
There's another one.
Those horses were so expensive, that you would try to capture and ransom it, like the Knight riding it.
Exactly. That was my first thought when I saw name of the video
A "grunt" who captured a horse wouldn't have it LONG enough to ransom it(unless you were part of a PROFESSIONAL war band, in which case your boss MIGHT pay you for it). War trained horses were ENORMOUSLY expensive(about the equivalent of buying a top-of-the-line Rolls-Royce), and the guy you worked for, knight, baron, earl, whatever, would immediately claim any horses captured from the enemy as HIS property; "I'm a NOBLEMAN. YOU'RE a PEASANT. I have a hundred swords to back me up. YOU have NO ONE to back YOU up. The horse is MINE. You want to ARGUE?"
If your lord was a nice guy, he might REWARD you for capturing the horse; a couple of shillings, for an animal worth over two hundred marks of silver.
Either way, the horse would belong to HIM, not YOU
@@mikegrossberg8624 But at least you aren't being trampled by the horse
I was thinking good quality food...
A knights horse had to be fed good, all that yummy meat on it...
Big strong horse with lots of lean, clean, well fed meat. It would feed the village for a week!
@@AmrothPalantir Only as a last resort. Find somebody to "fence" the horse, and you could get enough gelt to feed the village for longer than that!
Very happy to find your with its excellent content!
Excellent video! And at last answers to this question I'd been puzzling over for years :-)
Ah. Bretonians Vs warriors of chaos. Classic
A man of kultur
Blood for the Blood God and skulls for the Skull Throne
@@4sh2k8 Milk for the Khorne Flakes!
Chaos wins 60 % of the time
axl dlima Face my Holy grail Knight
To be honest, in the medieval times knights were basicly divine beings, covered in more armor than your entire peasent batallion can muster in their lifetime. So basicly an iron man, blessed by the God.
@Senpaii Desuu 5000 knights could easily take out 25000 of the 50000 men
@Senpaii Desuu I think you got the wrong idea.(1) Knights in armor were virtually impossible to kill. Unless you use special can openers (the spear is not) you won't get any results. (2) Knights are not slow and they don't have reduced movement. That's a fairy tale, you could just look that up on CZcams for example. (3) Maybe 10 people could bring down a single knight, it's not impossible, but in a battle it's not possible to surround every knight with 10 guys, the knights will form battle formations. Most of your peasant soldiers would block each other. (4) Morale works for the knights. You can't imagine how desperate soldiers become when they just can't open up the plate armor. The knights would just slice through their ranks. Remember, you don't see 50000 vs 5000 in a battle, you only see those near you. And out of those few you will see your men getting slaughtered. You will rush forward to replace your own men getting slaughtered, realizing it's you who is next.
They were literally another species of human too because of their diet and regime. They analysed the remains of a knight found in Scotland and his diet was 90% fish (you know like power lifters pound basa by the kilo? Yeah that) and he was built like a modern rugby player.
@Senpaii Desuu I am sorry, I gave you valid reasons, but apparently you lack the knowledge to understand them. You seem to draw you knowledge from computer games and don't know anything about medieval battle tactics. Attacking infantry with ballistas? Simply attacking a battle formation from behind? That's some fantasy stuff right there. And what is a "Batista" anyway? A quick google search indicates you seem to be interested in wrestling rather than medieval warfare. Listen dude, heavy armored fighters were the way to go up until decent guns were invented. History already disproves your claims.
@senpaii Desuu yeah video games you really seem to compare cost like in a game. You can't just round up 50000 peasants theire not endless. And by the way if the knights have devimated 20% of the troops people would rout. These battes were more aboutshowing strengt not fight till the last man.
I can easily defeat a knight I get a dagger dodge his attack and stab his ne- oh he blocked my attack and broke my arm and now I'm crying from pain.
The historically accurate film "Braveheart" 😉 includes an English cavalry charge into Scottish infantry who swap (drop) their weapons at the last minute to pick-up long sharpen stakes which they use to impale the charging horses at point blank range.
A video analysis of the ridiculousness of this scene would be both entertaining and educational, as you could point out what the film got right/wrong while commenting on how realistic and plausible the tactics used would be in a real medieval battle.
Metatron=greatness
:D
I knew they were effective... But not this effective...
@@krishnakantbhatt9947 Thing is, they weren't.
Have not watched the video yet but i can already predict the reasons:
1. No refigerators, so the meat will go bad before you've had a chance to consume all the leftover fallen soldiers.
2. It would negatively impact the effectiveness of your own cavalry (assuming the knight who is on the horse is on your side).
3. The horse should be taken back to camp for a thorough interrogation, being a knights horse it has likely been present during battle/strategy briefings etc.
Easy.
Please lead my country
You, managed to kill the horse:calm
The knight fell to the ground:calm
The knight is John wick: *P A N I C*
This was the best video of this channel I have seen so far.
While you did *insert pretty much anything*
He studied the blade...
...and banging Jenifer... :)
(Discovering yourself for the first time) "He was training the sword."
While you were training with the sword...
HE WAS TRAINING WITH THE SWORD!
SwordTune while you were studying for algebra,
*he was studying the sword*
Courage is also needed, horses are basically living cars charging at you
Yeah, you impale it on your stick, but it's still going to crush you to death. Might save your mates, but they might just break and run, being cut to ribbons anyways.
Also I heard that the Horses of knights were trained to kick people when in Battle
Might be false tghou
@@vinz4066 Depending on the situasion they don't really need training to kick people.
@@vinz4066 This is true. yes. Dressage for example is a remnant of that training. The Austrian Spanish Riding School in Vienna also is a remnant of this training.
That Horse, moving at say 20 mph, hits you with the same force as having swan dived out of a forth story window on to concrete sidewalk. For the next few minutes you will be very unhappy, then you will be dead.
Lance or otherwise there's range advantage on horseback. I've riden my whole life and I can reach absurdly far out at speed, or touch the ground. You can literally be parallel to the ground, which is torso plus arm length.
The last US Cavalry charge was just north of Bataan, the village of Morong, January 16, 1942. Around 27 trooper of the 26th Cavalry (PS) charged Japanese infantry and a few machine guns. The infantry fled before the charge. Hundreds more Japanese advancing through the swamp were also backed up by the panic. This delayed the Japanese advance by over a day.
First time watching, was surprised by how much humor was in this. A fusion of education and humor, love it
9:33 you're welcome
Dodging a knight is not the best idea simply because during a charge there would be another knight next to him, and probably another, and another, and another, and another... And if an entire formation of infantry starts dodging at the same time in different direction, well, that's called a certain death.
Yeah, think the best would be to drop on earth. Despite this seemed very unintuitive, horses would certainly try to avoid you and don't trampled you, because they are animals and they don't want to stumple.
Well, of course it's not 100% efficient, and not a viable tactic for an entire army. But it would certainly offer more chance of surviving than trying to outrun an horse ^^
so in other words, hold your ground, brace yourself, and hope for the best
@@onyxdragon1179 Well, from what I know throughout most ages spear was the base weapon of a footsoldier had he a shield or not. All the short weapons like swords and axes were backup for when it gets to a close melee, or they lose their spear. So yes, a well braced wall of spears does have a chance of repelling cavalry, or at least being threatening enough that they wouldn't charge at all. At least not from the front ;)
@@krankarvolund7771 If you're talking about knights that had the time and money to spend their lives training in warfare, chances are they could also afford to have an actual war horse as their mount. And, unlike the horse out in the pasture, who might not step on you if you lie down in front of them, a trained war horse would simply be SURE to step on you as they went over you. War horses were often stallions (rather than mares or geldings used as riding horses), and their natural aggressive instincts were trained and enhanced - so they WOULD step on you if you lay down in front of them. Being stepped on by a horse at full gallop (where the horse's entire weight is often supported on a single leg), with or without its own armor, ridden by an armored knight, would almost certainly be a death sentence.
@@Badger77722 Really? I wasn't aware of that, I thought that, you know, a horse would not want to stumple, even a human body may be an obstacle if he's at full speed ^^'
I love the little skits you create with the figures haha
Thanks for the fun and informative video. How effective was horse's armor? How did the horses themselves fight? Were captured knights' horses valuable?
History student here, I'll try to cover the questions to the best of my ability.
Q:How effective was horse armour?
A: I will go with the historians favourite reply. It depends on period, opposition, scenario, topography and what not. Generally, you can always find an answer to a question about effectiveness by looking at two factors: How common was is? For how long did people use it? Horse armour is almost as old as cavalry itself, we know of Scythian face masks for horses from roughly 600 BC. Cataphracts dominated the syrian planes for hundreds of years, their horses were clad in armour. Horse armour really only disappeared when full body armour did so too. Gunpowder made full body armour pretty inefficient. But to make a long answer short, horse armour was generally used if it could be afforded, so its perks must have outweighed its negatives, as for example restricted mobility and quicker fatigue.
Q: How did the horses themselves fight?
A: This is a question better directed to a biologist. Horses are herbivores, they tend to avoid combat unless it is inevitable. If a horse has lost its rider, it will not engage the enemy. It will likely try to escape from the battlefield entirely. If the rider is still on a warhorse, it will follow the orders of the rider. A horses best weapon is a kick from its behind legs, which might be useful if it is surrounded. The horse will probably kick infantry behind the rider, as it is stressed and gets attacked too. The main attacking purpose of a horse is the speed, mass and intimidation it provides.
Q: Were captured knights horses valuable?
A: Quick answer. Yes they were. They were the most expensive tools on the field for sure. Warhorses were special breeds, they were trained for decades to perform in battle conditions and were much sought after.
I'd use fire magic first to scare away the horse then I would impale the knight with an ice spike and then I would revive the undead knight with necromancy and use him to kill the other knights
Why didn't they think of that? Medieval people really *were* stupid...
@@random_idiot They forgot to read pvp guides
Magic users where nerfed during the Inquisition patch.
Sigh, no fun allowed...
@@NcrXnbi That is true
All the knights flee and learn to cast counterspell.
Memes in history video? InstaLIKE.
Potential History intensifies
Thank you i will use this advice when I'm in a battle against a knight with a horse
The people who say "I'll just stab the horse" is the equivalent to "ill just swim to the top of the tsunami"