I Spent 14 Years as RUSSIA in the Russo-Ukraine War | Across The Dnieper
Vložit
- čas přidán 14. 05. 2024
- #hoi4 #russia #heartsofiron4 #memes #gaming #notreal
I Spent 14 years as Russia in Across the Dnieper, here's how it went
Patreon: / colonelcam964
Email: ColonelCamYT@outlook.com
Join my Discord! / discord
Music:
- Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!):
uppbeat.io/t/mood-maze/cybert...
License code: J67KAYGXAPGWGXIY
Mods:
- Across the Dnieper
steamcommunity.com/sharedfile...
SUBSCRIBE here for HOI4 content / @colonelcam
Thanks for watching! - Hry
![Eminem - Houdini [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/22tVWwmTie8/mqdefault.jpg)
Story writing was a nice addition this time around. Really adds to the imersion, which is fun and is sometimes missed with other youtubers
Yes
Your little "addition" at the beginning of Your video is... Pretty good. You nailed the immersion when it comes to the whole "should I go to war with NATO, or not?" Thing
Two years on and the disclaimers for playing Russia in modern day HOI4 are getting shorter and less authentic haha
As they should, you don't see anyone making appologies when they play countries who did war crimes in WW2 when playing Vanilla
@@hugobernard9874 I don't mind not having a disclaimer but you gotta admit that a nation that did war crimes half a century ago is different than one doing warcrimes like, today and prolly yesterday too.
@@christianbroadbent7489i would remain careful with the idea of accusing of war crime when there are no concrete proof.
@@christianbroadbent7489 That's the issue of playing modern conflicts, but in this case and for other cases too all nations who participate in a war are doing crimes, there is no such a thing as a clean war.
@@JeanFares6970 Are you trying to claim Russia has done no war crimes or am I reading your comment wrong? Because Im pretty sure we got hours of footage of Russian missiles hitting and killing Civilians, or the UN investigated and confirmed Bucha massacre.
9:50 live russian oligarch reaction
That little girl and speech and the end was a campaign ad for LBJ back in the 60s
I like how you had an option to remove the bloated welfare system, chose not to, and then wondered why your consumer goods were vanishing XD
Across the dnieper, so poetic
Your civs were getting eaten up by consumer goods, when you hover over the consumer goods factory number it should say where its coming from
He did hover over them, I don’t know what specifically caused them tho. I think it might’ve been his mobilization and low stability? Or maybe the other economic system they have in the game?
@@joj9750 prettty sure it is mod related, happened in my play through too
@@robertdragon2838 that would make sense, cause I’ve never seen that much consumer goods before without major debuffs lol
Colonel Cam. The Siloviki side of the focus tree expands after you coup Vladimir Putin, which got a focus where you can declare war with NATO after defeating Ukraine.
Hey Cam keep up the good work, been watching you since part 1-2 of the Falangist Poland run and been hooked ever since. A suggestion for a vid could be Poland in Kaiserreich. They have a pretty good Focus and you can choose many outcomes from remaining with Germany or becoming independent, joining Austria or Russia. It truly would be a blast. :)
I felt like your pfp changed, also thank you for another lovely video!
Really rather than the the nuclear weapon button being a "You Lose", there should be a Crisis Escalation mechanic that is determined by multiple factors - including WMDs but also the fall of various cities (specifically near the Polish border). Ukraine could have escalation as well, like bombing Russian soil or inviting NATO aligned troops. Tactical nukes would be on a medium level, and global nuclear war would be the end of the escalation ladder. Both sides would have to watch the escalation mechanic, as it getting too high for Ukraine means the Russians nuke you and if it gets too high for Russia then NATO deploys troops or creates no fly zones.
The biggest problem is that nukes in hoi4 are just so hard to balance and it’s almost impossible to have them not be near useless (like base game) or a game over (like TNO)
I really like that your hoi4 video style are very peaceful to watch unlike other, I suggest you playing expert ai Germany
When I'm in a having controversial political opinions competition and my opponent is a Hoi4 modder:
I swear, watching hoi4 videos about the Russian Ukraine war feels so surreal
I love the story telling intro!
I have the exact same thinking about "ww3" that will hopefully never heppend
You deserve more subscribers
how did they make nuclear war event scarier than tnos?
24:10 You are correct that superior technology/equipment means victory. The failings of Vietnam are plentiful but I don’t think it necessarily shows that a technologically inferior force can absolutely decimate a superior one, but instead that defending is far, far easier than attacking.
Vietnam is jungle, and the US was not only fighting a conventional war but also a guérilla one. What the last few decades has shown is that large militaries are susceptible to guérilla tactics for many reasons. The terrain in Vietnam was super beneficial for the Vietcong, as they could hide traps and themselves anywhere and whittle away at US forces. Additionally, the war was highly unpopular in America, and higher levels of mobilization were impossible if the administration at the time wanted to stay in power.
The most important factor, however, was the reality of a Cold War proxy conflict. The US could not step boots into North Vietnam without Soviet retaliation. The most they could do is bomb the North, and that just wasn’t enough. The Vietcong was spread out and decentralized, and couldn’t be easily brought to their knees with a bombing campaign.
Suffice to say, Vietnam is a lesson that good equipment doesn’t win wars by itself. It shows that it’s doctrine, strategy, war support, troop morale, and logistics that win them. In the instance of Russia fighting NATO, they have none of those advantages. NATO has had decades more experience with warfare than the current Russian government, and the industrial might of the West is simply insurmountable. NATO is the combined military strength and knowledge of most of the worlds leading powers, having been a part of multiple conflicts since WW2. Russia, even if we’re including the Soviets, haven’t been in many since WW2. Ukraine is holding the Russians with the aid of just a bit of NATO equipment. What would actually well trained, well equipped, and well supplied Western troops do to Russia that couldn’t be described as Mike Tyson decking a toddler.
Don’t even get me started with the air war. Russia wasn’t able to get aerial superiority over Ukraine. Air wins modern warfare, and the United States ALONE has the largest air force on the planet. The second largest? The US Navy. The F-22s will have a fucking field day if they finally get to shred Russian fighters.
Hell, Western Russia is flat plains, and that is damn hard land to defend.
I give them 6 months, maybe. The only issue is, well. The bombs. Luckily my girlfriends hyperfixation is collecting bottle caps, so I will be absolutely loaded.
Great summarization bro
Only disagree with the "just a bit" Most of europeans do shared a lot of their equipments.
im a staff and a previous developer of the mod, glad you played our mod and hope you enjoyed!
I think the storytelling part at the start was great
The economic situatuon in criemea did get a lot better after 2014.
No shit ukraine is the POOREST in Europe yet life in Crimea is terrible
@@theboysclips2094 even though crimea was a major region in terms of generating revenue they let it fall in astate of disrepair
@@theboysclips2094 this is coming from someone who know nothing about crimea
35% drop in turism
No water supply for agriculture
Drop of 200k in population
RT syndrome live in action
@@sababugs1125 the drop in tourism was not a long lasting issue the next years it got more tourists than it did under ukriane.
The water issue is entirely ukriane fault btw they almost created an environmental disaster, nobody said a word though.
Russia had to bring in water by constructing a pipe system however since 2022 crimeans once more have water because russia took control ove the crimean canal.
There is no recorded drop in the population and none of the pro ukrianians articles which make the claim provide any source .
28:57
I kinda laughed when the actual countdown happened
For those who don't know, that was a very controversial American political ad called "Peace little girl" ran by Lyndon B. Johnson in 1964. I first watched it in civics class, and the video is just so frickin funny to me.
I really liked the "lore", keep doing it pls
Considering how I make up stories in my own HOI4 games, the story addition was great.
the intros get better every time
Ay, finnally playing as the good guys. 💪🇷🇺
😂 good one
@@michaelberkmann1850 I was half joking and half serious
@@jonathaslopes8038 Im not sure how I should interpret that
@@jonathaslopes8038that's... disturbing
@@michaelberkmann1850it means things can be morally grey
i personally support Russia in the conflict as a whole but that doesn’t mean i support putin’s government as a whole
i see Russia’s war on Ukraine as the best way to guarantee the rights to sovereignty of Russians in the Ukraine
Russian was banned from being taught in Ukrainian schools, this IMO is an attempt to eliminate the influence of Russian culture in the country, but in the process that destroys centuries of heritage between what should be brother countries
EX: imagine if the US banned the teaching of Spanish, it’s not whataboutism, just to give perspective
And while i do believe that Ukraine has a right to defend itself i also believe that Russians have the right to defend their heritage, even if that defense comes with strings attached
TL;DR: DPR, LPR, Crimea and Novorussia are the good guys
Ukraine shouldn’t trample on people’s rights or lives in the case of the minsk agreements
russia shouldn’t kill people, even for a “good” cause
Still Waiting for the Channel Pic. Change 👀
20:10 nega nega
Loved this one
press esc when a focus pops up to open the focus tree
Okay, tbh in start I think that he said:"Putin raised his hand and said:"Hail!""
Vladimir Putin
-100% offensive operations penalty
+200% boost party popularity scheme bonus
The voice snippet at the end was from a Presidential Ad from Kennedy Or Lyndon B Johnson I forget which one
Morals? In hoi4?? UNBELIEVABLE!
I am Romanian. The name of the guy who is leader when you puppeted Romania is Vadim Tudor. Ummm, he died in 2015.
What’s the song at the start?
You really need to try EoaNB
I feel like one of the things weird about the mod is just how much buffs Ukraine gets. Even if you fix everything wrong with the Russian army before the war. Realistically if thats the case, they'd get steamrolled.
It's made by Pro Ukranians that's why
Its literally not even that hard winning as Russia. you're just bad
@@marysartr No it's not
@@Apsisikelis69even the guy in the video restarted 3 times dude 💀
it’s fine to admit that a little bias is at play
I haven't watched the video (yet?) but this might be the most controversial one
that mod is insanely biased lol
Youre just bad
@@Apsisikelis69yeah taking away equipment constantly is me being bad
@@ryannowo5954Its trying to emulate real life supply problems and modern frontlines in an arcady map painting game from 2016 and it applies both for russia and ukraine. If you play the 2014 as ukraine will just be bombarded with heavy debuffs while russia just sits out the war.
It isnt biased, its just hard.
@@Aaron067 yeah constant debuffs very fun
@@ryannowo5954 that's just war. Read a soldier point of view book from an author that was in a war, it's almost always a mess of logistics, supply and command. Operations are planned yes, but nothing is going to be 100% efficient, wouldn't be a war otherwise.
roast pork leg and doritos, you f*cking gremlin. loved the vid btw, keep up the good work!
I suggest to spend 20 years as Shukshin's Russian Federation In TNO With the Second west Russian war sub mod
Can you play TNO and do Monarchist Komi playthrough please??? Also the intro of this video was gold
"""monarchist""" komi :]
@@alexcritical9351 yes, what else would it be?
@@helenos_152 i sure hope that country respects the rulings of human rights conventions!
HOWARD HAMLIN?
Why i dont have the right names for citys if i play this mod ?
Does Someone know the name of the music on 0:57 ?
"Служить России!" or "To serve Russia!"
its to serve russia but i dont know what version lol
I knew it sounded similar.
Wow your videos are very high quality, you deserve wayyyy more subs
Putin has liked the video
14:54 Ukraine survived because of a lack of cohesion on the russian side. They ran out of fuel for their tanks, they didn't have any understanding of the terrain and didn't have any maps, the units weren't properly briefed on what was happening, they had unencrypted comms (meaning the Ukrainians could listen in and locate who was talking), and they underestimated the Ukrainian resolve and suffered ambush upon ambush.
I like the story intro a lot more. The previous way of showing what you’re doing in the future to going back to the start is really confusing for a first time viewer and may have them mistake your channel for an ADHD editing style channel lol
Farewell forever (im writing down all the songs)
1:30 so glad that a content creator finally said it
Nice a Video at 2:30 a.m.
Mod?
Vietnam and Russia are not comparable. Both wars would be total different. I think Russia could occupy a few swats or NATO area, the Baltic for example. But I don´t see Russia really winning against NATO.
Day 4 of asking cam to play age of imperialism.
COOL
Correction Viktor Orbán isn't the president of Hungary but prime minister.
What's the russian song used in the video?
Timestamp?
To Serve Russia (DPRK Choir Version)
try “east showdown” mod
4:03 Free and fair referendum! just like real life!
plz play monarchist komi in tno, it’s really fun and wholesome
TNO sucks, no.
@@carinaslima no
@@PatrikGorniak It does suck,
@@carinaslima nuh uh
@@carinaslima Its subjective. Some people like it, some people hate it. Just because you hate it doesn't mean that it objectively sucks.
I believe russia wouldn’t win against nato unless other countries got involved in the war against nato. Worse outcome, nuclear war
I could easily be wrong, but I think NATO would win anyway, the US military is just that good. More countries joining would just mean more deaths
you should play "East Showdown". its like "Across the Dnieper", but a little better, though unfinished
ГОЙДА, БРАТЬЯ!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ГОООООЛ
There 100% should be an option to put Andrew Tate in power in Romania lol
Across The Dnieper Better Millenium Dawn And N.V.
I mean sure but it's very limited. I can't play North korea, isis, america, China, the UK, Iran etc
How tf does this video hav 7 likes and 3 views
It's a new video
@@PLKID9075 he mean that the like are more than view
Hello
20:10 What did he say 😭
I think you lost alm your factories because you kept the bloated welfere sistem spirit
Personally I don’t think that Russia under any case can win a peer to peer conventional war against NATO, assuming NATO commits everything to the war.
Russia doesn’t have many stealth aircraft and do they even have weapons for them, i.e the ones you can put in their weapons bay. Russian Armed Forces was extremely devastated by the war in Ukraine, they won’t be able to fight NATO at all.
There is no field where the Russians are superior to NATO, let alone equal.
Yeah, Russia would eventually become desperate and.. Nuclear war.
@@LukaSchoone-sd1wnThis is their trump card (no pun intended), that they have more nukes than all of NATO and a plurality of all nukes in the world.
Early war would russia dominate, estonia has 4k personel in the entire army
Russia is already fighting the entirety of NATO in Ukraine and the only thing that is devastating was burnt NATO equipment along the border
@@patrickkloiber741 which are well trained for delaying such bigger force + nato spearhead forces are present
Vietnam was kind of like Ukraine in reverse.
The average native conscripts were poorly equipped, but they were also supported by the USSR with modern equipment and their AA took out over 10k aircraft which the US and her allies were completely unprepared for.
the moment putin become boris savinkov
bravo russian state
I hope this comment section is peaceful and respectable to each other 🥰
Uh oh
PLEASE SOMEONE TELL ME HOW DO YOU GET RID OF THE WHITE SQUARES!!
it's a graphics thing on his end
I have that too but how do you get rid of it???
On the launcher switch from 11x to 9x legacy in game settings
23:57 no 🗿
*refuses to elaborate*
20:10 what did he say???
It looks so ugly seeing poland behind russia, dont see how it could get fixed
TO SERVE RUSSIA, LETS GOO (the song)
Russia could maybe push into poland but it cannot win a conventional war against NATO.
0:56-1:08 song?
to serve russia
Song; to serve Russia
6:38 thats not an enclave
yeah my soul was hurt a bit when he said that
Bro speaks English, but failed English
Cool video
having seen a presentaiton on war games about Russia fighting Nato, basically Russia couldn't hope to defeat the west. At most they probably could take most of Latvia and Estonia in a very optimistic scenario for the Russians, and even in that case attacking Lithuania would doom any Russian invasion as result of Lithuania basically being the big eastern logistics hub for Nato, plus Russia also has Finland and Sweden closing the Baltic Sea for their navy thanks to some anti ship missiles in Finland, plus the Swedish fleet
Russia by itself definitely couldn’t, but Russia and the CCP definitely could, and no “logistics hub” could stop a two front oceanic war
this war will totally depend on who attacks first
@@Sgt_ioiwsl logistics win wars, and in the end China and Russia don't have the logistics. They would have a first strike advantage, but that wouldn't compensate for the sheer industrial capacity of the western world once it kicks into gear
Continue ❤
sorry, but having 200 factories in 2022 is worse than russian bot did in my game, while I had 260 on Ukraine. in 2021, because he attacked in 2021
I highly doubt russia can win against NATO but I can see them winning against ukraine and that giving russia a sense of national pride and confidence to survive and slowly wait till America declines and then attack east europe if NATO gets disolved.
that sounds like Russia winning against NATO
@@Sgt_ioiwsl I mean in a conventional war
Fun fact, modern guerrilla warfare like in vietnam and afghanistan only worked because of the Geneva Convention. Historically guerrilla groups would be destroyed through genociding the local populace, very good example of that being the Romans in Judea, Illyria and in Gaul with the deaths ranging from 500k in judea to 1 million dead and another 1 million sold to slavery in Gaul.
Another example is the Harrying of the North in the winter of 1069-1070, where the bastard of Normandy subjugated Northumberland by killing 75% of the population, according to the Domesday Book written in 1086. There was also reports of people engaging in cannibalism, eating normally taboo animals like cats and dogs, and even people selling themselves into slavery in a desperate attempt to avoid the conquerors wrath.
50 years later the chronicler Orderic Vitalis wrote: "The King stopped at nothing to hunt his enemies. He cut down many people and destroyed homes and land. Nowhere else had he shown such cruelty. This made a real change. To his shame, William made no effort to control his fury, punishing the innocent with the guilty. He ordered that crops and herds, tools and food be burned to ashes. More than 100,000 people perished of starvation. I have often praised William in this book, but I can say nothing good about this brutal slaughter. God will punish him".
>Fun fact, modern guerrilla warfare like in vietnam and afghanistan only worked because of the Geneva Convention. Historically guerrilla groups would be destroyed through genociding the local populace
Yeah, totally no genociding happened in Vietnam
Not if the populace is being armed with guns. All it takes is some other nation with a bunch of stuff at its disposal to very much break your whole wartime strategy.
@donaldtrumplover2254 they still need food, which most of would be sourced locally and nothing prevents you from destroying all crops and killing all livestock with aircraft. Depending on the end goal the conqueror has in mind the local populace is better off dead and replaced with settlers and colonists once the dust has settled.
Even if the populace is armed they won't be able to do anything against an opponent that doesn't need them or plan to keep them alive. Afghanistan for example was a war to replace the government structure of the country, which meant the Soviets and the Americans needed the population of Afghanistan alive.
Who are trying to deceive America lost because it lost
The us committed genocide in every country they invaded
Just compare civilian deaths of iraq to Ukraine war
Topical
IMMA LION🦁PIZZA🍕CHICKEN🐔
This is getting political
Against NATO? No way
i already replied to one person with a long list of reasons but for you i think i’ll just leave you with an army saying i learned from a man who spent two tours in Afghanistan and saw combat
“If it says US Army, it don’t work”
Name of the song in 1:00 pls ?
to serve russia
Its not just you. Most of NATO is struggling Military wise rn especially when it comes to manpower. Thats what 80 years of softy soft politics does to a population. Not proud or willing to fight and die for their homeland.