@@narek323 um ok why not? youtube is infinitely more available, accessible, flexible, customizable, shareable, usable than someone's local public television. seems like asking for step backwards to me
Thanks for the upload! 2:45 - The answer to that question on getting along with Feynman changes over the years. I like Gell-Mann though. He seems like a very likable guy.
Made back at the time when people who had devoted themselves to becoming very learned in some area of science were respected for presenting their views rather than being ridiculed because some find their views to be religiously or economically offensive (think evolution and/or anthropogenic climate change).
All these smart theoreticians , including Feynman , have stood on the shoulders of hard working engineers and data collectors for their glories. Little have they understood that there is a fundamental particle that pervades the universe of which all the others are composed and that there is only one force, the strong repulsive nuclear force which itself is a product of the kinetic energy of the fundamental particles emanating and entering the core of all long lived elementary particles. The photon is an energy quantum that decelerates fundamental particles thereby propagating itself interminably. The mesons and W and Z bosons are just sprays of fundamental particles that have taken a core with them and evaporate most of their mass back down to an elementary particle.
12:10 Did he say "80 inch hydrogen bubble chamber" ? I couldn't understand the words, I had to look it in un google by "brookhaven collider 1960s eighty inch hydrogen bubble chamber"
I would love to see such kind of interviews on public television, nowadays it's only song contests and dumb people.
seems like a step in the wrong direction technologically, no? kinda like saying I wish this book were on a scroll
@@lukewormholes5388 It's not like saying that at all. Bad analogy.
@@narek323 um ok why not? youtube is infinitely more available, accessible, flexible, customizable, shareable, usable than someone's local public television. seems like asking for step backwards to me
he's talking about the content.
@@lukewormholes5388 Why can't it be on both? Not everyone watches CZcams; why should those that don't be denied this great content?
Thanks for the upload!
2:45 - The answer to that question on getting along with Feynman changes over the years. I like Gell-Mann though. He seems like a very likable guy.
Thanks
Made back at the time when people who had devoted themselves to becoming very learned in some area of science were respected for presenting their views rather than being ridiculed because some find their views to be religiously or economically offensive (think evolution and/or anthropogenic climate change).
Thanks for uploading video.
Clearest explanation is given to audience by the experimentalist....feynman only made it confusing
That era where science and knowledge was valued and telecasted rather than the stupid shows shown today
All these smart theoreticians , including Feynman , have stood on the shoulders of hard working engineers and data collectors for their glories. Little have they understood that there is a fundamental particle that pervades the universe of which all the others are composed and that there is only one force, the strong repulsive nuclear force which itself is a product of the kinetic energy of the fundamental particles emanating and entering the core of all long lived elementary particles. The photon is an energy quantum that decelerates fundamental particles thereby propagating itself interminably. The mesons and W and Z bosons are just sprays of fundamental particles that have taken a core with them and evaporate most of their mass back down to an elementary particle.
What is the bird chirping in the background?!
Mockingbird.
Carl sagan sounds a lot like gell mann or should I say the other way round
The outcome is nue Tron excellent observer to answer the endever
It is seen in the radiation test equipment with a priszm you can see the power(ATOMIC-radiation)
By color
12:10 Did he say "80 inch hydrogen bubble chamber" ? I couldn't understand the words, I had to look it in un google by "brookhaven collider 1960s eighty inch hydrogen bubble chamber"
Evil cannot go through silver
Actually it is sulfer that is the wrong atom to be used
O mm ega minus when viewed with a television microscope a view is advanced
5:47 Only Physics could bring an Israeli scientist to work under the direction of a Pakistani scientist in a British university.
1:00
Nia is what Einstein noticed but didn't say a word because the time is now the color of nuclear radiation
R,e,i