Unabomber: Příběh génia, který využil svou inteligenci k ničení
Vložit
- čas přidán 18. 05. 2024
- FBI dal pořádně zabrat. Zavrhnul společnost a začal posílat nebezpečné balíky po celé Americe 💣
Bonusové díly každý týden: herohero.co/staysteak 📺⚡
Instagram: / adam_miklica 📸
Hudební projekt: / meeca
TikTok: / staysteak
KAPITOLY
00:00 Ted, absolvent Harvardu
02:01 Poustevník v Montaně
04:23 Letecká pošta
06:07 Pomsta systému
09:15 Bláznův manifest
12:12 Soud a trest
15:00 Projekt MKULTRA
Více opravdového zločinu 🔪: bit.ly/StayKrimi
Další děsivá videa ❄️ (posmrtný život, mrazivé telefonáty,...): bit.ly/desivavidea
Poslouchej na SPOTIFY
Audioverze: spoti.fi/3suGcsu
Creepypasty: spoti.fi/3CKuxtN
Kamera - Hrabě von VFX 👏
/ hrabe_von_vfx
Rešerše - František Hájek 👏
/ _researchman_
Zdroje:
bit.ly/ubomber
"The industrial revolution and it's consequences have been disaster for the human race-"..
No, s některými jeho názory nejde než nesouhlasit. Ale vraždit kvůli tomu lidi - to by jich moc nezbylo. V jeho případě se také potvrzuje pravidlo, že příliš inteligentní lidé jsou často podivíni a často vlastně trochu cvoci. Škoda, že nevyužil svůj potenciál lepším způsobem.
No smutné je, že kromě extrému se lidem moc oči prostě otevřít nedají. Určitě to šlo nějak jinak, ale nekonfliktní a mírové řešení nikdy neuspěje. Reálně je prakticky už nemožné zabránit kolapsu společnosti a přírody.
Si borec kámo sledují tvé videa už nějaký rok a posunul ses hodně dál z kuchyně do studia... Ale ať se ti daří 🙂🙂🙂
Teprv rok? Pche!
borec tam napsal už nějaký rok což je více než 1 😅
A co jste dokázaly vy hm??🤣🤣🤣
Mne sa ta kuchyna pacila 😁
@@vladimirav9071 ja sem pro ti ni taky nic neměl
ted měl pravdu, jenom lidi to nevidí a je to smutný
Vláda nechce, aby to lidi věděli
@@stodola1 xdddd
@@UncleTed23 rip
The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
R.I.P 🕊️
ta kuchyně byla taková ikoničtější ale stále se na tebe moc ráda kouknu
přesně mněla něco do sebe 🙂
Souhlasím! Já Vás také sleduji již nějaký rok a musím říci, že jste se opravdu vypracoval! Skvělá práce!
Díky! 👍🌷
Děkuji, že stále vydáváš videa, i když z toho na yt nemáš ani korunu. 💞💞💞
Jsi borec Adame!!!!!
Ahoj Adamae, už dlouho Tě poslouchám a máš nádherná videa, i když někdy smutná. I přesto, díky za vše!
Ta kvalita zpracování je naprosto neskutečná, strašně dobře se na to kouká a poslouchá!
video: nejhledanější muž v Americe
co jsem přečetl já: nejhladší nůž v Americe
Bomba doslova, Zase skvělé video u kterého jsem se zase něco dozvěděl
Strašně se mi líbí evoluce tvého kanálu, ale chybí mi ne tolik seriozní vydea z kuchyně
Nostalgie je krásný pocit 😄 Zároveň ale spousta těch momentů a videí, která jsem vám rád prezentoval, nejde zreplikovat. Jsem rád, že tě baví i posun!
Atmosféře trochu ubírá že za tebou už není sporák starší než Metuzalém, ale i tak parádní video.
daddy ted
Luxusní videa ❤️👍👌
Super!
Líbilo se mi to...a moc ❤️
Udělej další video o breivikovi 🙏
Skvělé video. Díky. Příjemný vývoj našeho starého dobrého Catamurloca. :-)
R.I.P.
Jsi prostě skvělej
Manifest jsem četl a musím říct, že užjsem po přečtení nikdy nebyl stejný. Pokud bych ale měl volit mezi filosofií Unabomber vs Linkola, tak beru Linkolu....
Pravda.
CHAD a má skvělé manifesto.
Unabomber, četl jsem.
Asi taky nějakej manifest napíšu
Dobré video, ale myslím ,že o UNABOMB je ešte veľa zaujímavého čo si nespomenul a tiež čo sa týka jeho a MKULTRA je toho omnoho viac...
Zajímavé téma
Nenatočil bys díl HUMAN BOMB Neuilly? Děkuji
Příště by to chtělo udělat případ Killdozer :)
Free Ted now!
Prosim video o The acid king
Škoda, že tak inteligentní člověk dopadl tak špatně..😢
Nechtěl bys udělat video o backrooms prosím jinak mám rád tvoji tvorbu a pokračuj v tom hodně mě baví tví videa ❤👍
Znam ten film ten miluju
RIP
Ahoj, máš skvělá videa, většinou je poslouchám před spaním na dobrou noc. 😅 Když byl ale ten chlap tak moc inteligentní, proč dělal ty bomby špatně?
Když něco vyrábíš není to inteligenci. Bomby dělal dobře, posílal je 17 let.
Lets gooo
crazy af
Máš můj odběr Adame Miklico, tvoris fajn obsah ale znám tě jen díky segre, 20yo já jsem 30yo
yes zroovna jsem o něm něco hledal
unabomber nebo-li ted kaczynski měl 167IQ a byl profesorem na harvardu ve 25letech, takže to vypovídá o tom že rozhodně nebyl hloupý
Ted měl pravdu!
cením tvorbu ale je mi líto, že v komentářích nikdo nerozebírá Teodora, celkem rozumím jeho činům, avšak to ho neomlouvá, mátě někdo něco zajímavého navíc?
Netflix
Proč ne už Katamurlock
Bum bum bum
To jakej název série zní to anarchistický
👍🎃
upřímně si myslím že ted byl hodný člověk (neomlouvám ho udělal hrozné činy ale chápu ho)
Jen si zvolil špatnou cestu nebo to tak, protože jinak by se o něj nezajímalo tolik lidí.
Strýček Ted měl pravdu
Já sním souhlasím ale nesouhlasím s zabíjením ale nejraději bych to všechno zrušil proč je to tak návykové vtátil bych se třeba do roku 1800 to by bylo tak akorát
Věděl si že plešatí lidé nemají vlasy?
Ne.
@@cooler_carpington teď to víte
@@Felixdiary Já si dělal srandu, btw.
@@cooler_carpington já vím 💅
Tohle není Ovčáček.,..
Dík že si mi olajkoval video na tiktoku
The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in “advanced” countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in “advanced” countries.
2. The industrial-technological system may survive or it may break down. If it survives, it MAY eventually achieve a low level of physical and psychological suffering, but only after passing through a long and very painful period of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will be inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of dignity and autonomy.
3. If the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later.
4. We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system. This revolution may or may not make use of violence; it may be sudden or it may be a relatively gradual process spanning a few decades. We can’t predict any of that. But we do outline in a very general way the measures that those who hate the industrial system should take in order to prepare the way for a revolution against that form of society. This is not to be a POLITICAL revolution. Its object will be to overthrow not governments but the economic and technological basis of the present society.
5. In this article we give attention to only some of the negative developments that have grown out of the industrial-technological system. Other such developments we mention only briefly or ignore altogether. This does not mean that we regard these other developments as unimportant. For practical reasons we have to confine our discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which we have something new to say. For example, since there are well-developed environmental and wilderness movements, we have written very little about environmental degradation or the destruction of wild nature, even though we consider these to be highly important.
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MODERN LEFTISM
6. Almost everyone will agree that we live in a deeply troubled society. One of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world is leftism, so a discussion of the psychology of leftism can serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of modern society in general.
7. But what is leftism? During the first half of the 20th century leftism could have been practically identified with socialism. Today the movement is fragmented and it is not clear who can properly be called a leftist. When we speak of leftists in this article we have in mind mainly socialists, collectivists, “politically correct” types, feminists, gay and disability activists, animal rights activists and the like. But not everyone who is associated with one of these movements is a leftist. What we are trying to get at in discussing leftism is not so much movement or an ideology as a psychological type, or rather a collection of related types. Thus, what we mean by “leftism” will emerge more clearly in the course of our discussion of leftist psychology. (Also, see paragraphs 227-230.)
8. Even so, our conception of leftism will remain a good deal less clear than we would wish, but there doesn’t seem to be any remedy for this. All we are trying to do here is indicate in a rough and approximate way the two psychological tendencies that we believe are the main driving force of modern leftism. We by no means claim to be telling the WHOLE truth about leftist psychology. Also, our discussion is meant to apply to modern leftism only. We leave open the question of the extent to which our discussion could be applied to the leftists of the 19th and early 20th centuries.
9. The two psychological tendencies that underlie modern leftism we call “feelings of inferiority” and “oversocialization.” Feelings of inferiority are characteristic of modern leftism as a whole, while oversocialization is characteristic only of a certain segment of modern leftism; but this segment is highly influential.
FEELINGS OF INFERIORITY
10. By “feelings of inferiority” we mean not only inferiority feelings in the strict sense but a whole spectrum of related traits; low self-esteem, feelings of powerlessness, depressive tendencies, defeatism, guilt, self- hatred, etc. We argue that modern leftists tend to have some such feelings (possibly more or less repressed) and that these feelings are decisive in determining the direction of modern leftism.
11. When someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that is said about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) we conclude that he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem. This tendency is pronounced among minority rights activists, whether or not they belong to the minority groups whose rights they defend. They are hypersensitive about the words used to designate minorities and about anything that is said concerning minorities. The terms “negro,” “oriental,” “handicapped” or “chick” for an African, an Asian, a disabled person or a woman originally had no derogatory connotation. “Broad” and “chick” were merely the feminine equivalents of “guy,” “dude” or “fellow.” The negative connotations have been attached to these terms by the activists themselves. Some animal rights activists have gone so far as to reject the word “pet” and insist on its replacement by “animal companion.” Leftish anthropologists go to great lengths to avoid saying anything about primitive peoples that could conceivably be interpreted as negative. They want to replace the world “primitive” by “nonliterate.” They seem almost paranoid about anything that might suggest that any primitive culture is inferior to our own. (We do not mean to imply that primitive cultures ARE inferior to ours. We merely point out the hypersensitivity of leftish anthropologists.)
12. Those who are most sensitive about “politically incorrect” terminology are not the average black ghetto- dweller, Asian immigrant, abused woman or disabled person, but a minority of activists, many of whom do not even belong to any “oppressed” group but come from privileged strata of society. Political correctness has its stronghold among university professors, who have secure employment with comfortable salaries, and the majority of whom are heterosexual white males from middle- to upper-middle-class families.
13. Many leftists have an intense identification with the problems of groups that have an image of being weak (women), defeated (American Indians), repellent (homosexuals) or otherwise inferior. The leftists themselves feel that these groups are inferior. They would never admit to themselves that they have such feelings, but it is precisely because they do see these groups as inferior that they identify with their problems. (We do not mean to suggest that women, Indians, etc. ARE inferior; we are only making a point about leftist psychology.)
14. Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong and as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men.
15. Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. The reasons that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond with their real motives. They SAY they hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western civilization. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist’s real motive for hating America and the West. He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful.
16. Words like “self-confidence,” “self-reliance,” “initiative,” “enterprise,” “optimism,” etc., play little role in the liberal and leftist vocabulary. The leftist is anti-individualistic, pro-collectivist. He wants society to solve everyone’s problems for them, satisfy everyone’s needs for them, take care of them. He is not the sort of person who has an inner sense of confidence in his ability to solve his own problems and satisfy his own needs. The leftist is antagonistic to the concept of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.
17. Art forms that appeal to modern leftish intellectuals tend to focus on sordidness, defeat and despair, or else they take an orgiastic tone, throwing off rational control as if there were no hope of accomplishing anything through rational calculation and all that was left was to immerse oneself in the sensations of the moment.
1
Vlastně ho stvořila CIA.
czcams.com/video/63CdlujHiII/video.html reálne zábery duchov zachytených na kameru Paranormal cast 4
Who asked?
@@stodola1 your mom
AM