100th VIDEO❤️ RESOLVED-12 PSEUDO FORCE,ROTATING FRAME PHYSICS,CORIOLIS,CENTRIFUGAL,EULER FORCES
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 09. 2024
- PLEASE SHARE THIS AND PROMOTE THE CHANNEL
12TH VIDEO OF RESOLVED SERIES FOCUSSES ON THE COMPONENTS OF PSEUDO FORCE :CORIOLIS,CENTRIFUGAL AND EULER FORCES
"RESOLVED" series will present videos curated on doubts of brilliant -topper batch students with whom I have been involved with different CHAI-NA Hyderabad campuses from 2012 to present. The association with these students was an enriching experience for me💓. I sincerely hope , it will be same for those (teachers and students alike) who will go through these series of videos .
HERE'S THE RESOLVED SERIES VIDEO ON RELATIVE VELOCITY AND PSEUDO FORCE IN ROTATING FRAME👇
• RESOLVED-06 !A COMMON ...
HERE'S THE ELABORATE PICTURE EXPLAINING CYCLONE MOVEMENT DUE CORIOLIS FORCE👇
drive.google.c...
RESOLVED series playlist 👇
• RESOLVED SERIES
HERE'S THE LINK TO PHYSICS SIR JEE ORIGINALS VIDEO ON PROGRESSIVE STRING WAVE ENERGY ANALYSIS👇
• ORIGINALS - 🎁STRING WA...
HERE'S THE PLAYLIST OF PHYSICSSIRJEE ORIGINALS👇
• PHYSICSSIRJEE ORIGINALS
HERE'S THE LINK FOR PATHFINDER SOLUTIONS PLAYLIST👇
• PATHFINDER SOLUTIONS
OTHER PLAYLISTS
HERE'S THE LINK FOR "OLYMPIAD WORKOUT SERIES" BOOKS,SYLLABUS,RESOURCES👇
• ANNOUNCEMENT-2 🧨"OLYMP...
RESOLVED series playlist 👇
• RESOLVED SERIES
HERE'S THE PLAYLIST OF REST OF THE "OLYMPIAD WORKOUT SERIES"👇
• OLYMPIAD WORKOUT SERIES
HERE'S PLAYLIST FOR AITS SELECT SOLUTIONS SERIES👍
• "AITS SELECT" SOLUTION...
HERE'S THE JEE ADV SOLUTIONS -THE ALPHA AND OMEGA SERIES👇
• JEE ADV SOLUTIONS - TH...
HERE'S LINK FOR PLAYLIST OF "JEE MAINS DEBATED QUESTIONS" PLAYLIST👇
• JEE MAINS DEBATED QUES...
FOR REST OF THE INTERESTING BRAIN TEASING JEE PHYSICS CHALLENGES AND CONCEPTS , PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO MY CHANNEL " PHYSICS sir JEE " HERE BELOW
/ channel
/ @physicssirjee
THE CHANNEL IS AN IMPORTANT RESOURCE TO THOSE STUDENTS PREPARING FOR JEE MAINS, JEE ADVANCED EXAMS IN INDIA AND FOR PHYSICS OLYMPIADS LIKE NBPhO,INPhO,IPHO,HKPhO,BPhO ETC GLOBALLY.
#PHYSICSSIRJEE,#JEEDAILYLIVE,#JEESPRINT,#JEELECTURES,#JEEPHYSICSLIVE,#OLYMPIADWORKOUT,#RESOLVED,#PSEUDOFORCE,#CORIOLIS,#CENTRIFUGAL,#EULER,#ROTATINGFRAME,
#jee,#jeemain,#jeephysics,#jeeadvanced,#iitjee,#iit,#iitjeephysics,#jeeadvancedphysics,#AITS,#GMP,#ALLEN,#FIITJEE,#KROTOV,#jeemainsphysics,#neet,#neetphysics,#physicslectures,#schoolphysics,#precollegephysics,#physicsconcepts,#physicschallenges,#liveclasses,#teachinginenglish,#ncert,#irodov,#pathfindersolutions,#pathfinder,#irodovsolutions,#cbse,#ncertphysics
100 vids and 1000 subs , congrats sir your efforts have been phenomenal and both teachers and students will get benefit from such awesome content .
Congratulations 👏👏👌👍👆
Thank you sir ☺️🙏
Big fan sir akash sir
@@PHYSICSSIRJEE u too sir.
Big Fan Of You sir ....... Teachers like You, Nitin Sir , Janardhan Sir , Ashish Arora sir , Manas Patnaik Sir have made me Love Physics ........ Thanks A LOT
Two hidden legends of physics on you tube Akash sir and Janardhan sir ❤️❤️
No of Subscribers on CZcams vs Quality of content follows Maxwellian distribution
😂😂😂
lol
This makes no hecking sense.
@@korigamik Study Maxwell graph then comment. 😂😂
@@anonymousanonymous443 those emojis represent your parents right after you were born and until the day you die.
nitin sir and janardhan sir you both have made me love physics, the concepts you teach are really very interesting😊, you make tough questions a piece of cake. Thanks you sir and congrats for both of you sir for reaching 1K subs🥳
@Puspal Paul yes 😁
i find u are better than physics galaxy sir. you are great. if i see your vedios i think it is a golden mark on my jee prepration
Thanks for the compliment 🙏 🙂and you are entitled to have your opinion . Everyone does but I generally don't encourage comparisons among teachers especially on public platform. Everyone has their own style but with a common goal of trying their best to make students understand.
Ashish Arora sir has done a lot of work in this field over a long period of time . It would be great for students in our country if a lot of upcoming teachers can emulate his hardwork.
Thanks again and keep following the channel 😊
Man its a different feeling watching it from IIT Kanpur Hall 5!! Emotional.... Anyone who is watching this video, you will have a good time in JEE Advanced
Sir, you are definitely not overestimating yourself. The content delivered is indeed unique, enriching in concepts and top-notch. The reason why views are maybe not as expected is probably because mains is approaching for my friends. Congratulations for the 100th video and 1k subscribers!! Hope you will have many more viewers, I will continue to support this channel even after my JEE being a physics lover.
thankyou sir for providing this quality content and teaching it with your dedicated efforts .
i was confused in this concept {basically i had doubt in what was given in hcv}
i cannot pay your "guru dakshyana" through this youtube channel but the only gift i can give you is that your effort in this lecture has given me a new weapon for my jee advanced which i am confident will definitely reflect in my jee advanced score(because i understood the concept taught in this video well and also analysed the cyclone movement image that you gave in pdf)
congratulation for 14k subs
Thanks a lot for the encouragement ☺️. I wish the content gets appreciated by more people like you 🙏
This video cleared many misconceptions. Until now I used to think, pseudo force= centrifugal force. Thanks sir for making such videos
i have seen a very high hard work in changing colors of font to make student feel comfortable in understanding,and sir you did your level really the best.
This video is really in a league of its own. The fundamentals of rotation pseudo forces have been explained in such detail that everything can be understood by a normal student. You sir are a gem of a physics teacher. Many can understand what you are trying to teach, but only a few can make it understand in such an easy manner.
congratulations sir!! thnk u for ur efforts u are a true legend; my physics improved very much bcoz of this beautiful channel i can't describe in words❤❤❤❤💚💚💙🤩🤩
Di abhi aap konse college me h?
@@Nishantpaswan456 op 🔥🔥
I pray for your long-life sir. Such beautiful, top-notch content being delivered with such passion (I could fully feel it in your voice) for free on this platform is simply unbelievable. Thankyou so very much sir
Thank u sir ❤️. Aapki help ki wajah se mera physics me interest drastically increase hua hai . Thnks from bottom of my heart.
Thank you . Keep practicing and Keep up the good work 🙂👍🏼.
@@PHYSICSSIRJEE sure sir :)
Done #100
April 9
This lecture was pure masterpiece 👌🏻
Amazing video sir.
Sir main problem ye hai ki JEEA ke itne jyada competition ke kaarn students aapke channel ko jyada share nhi krte, your content is like gold which they want to keep it to themselves only, kyoki agr sbko pta chl jayega to sb is level pr aa jayenge, aur baki jo channels famous hai wo isiliye hai kyonki sbko pta ki unka content dekhne nhi dekhne se JEEA ke prepration pr koi frk nhi padega but ye dekhne walo ko surely upper hand rahega, Even mere dosto ko aapke channel ke bare me pta tha pr unhone kabhi nhi bataya.
The explanation was insane ,It was very helpful .Thank you sir
Thanks to the cylindrical coordinate system the homework problem you gave becomes easy and yes result is even true for general case when r2 and r1 are not collinear ......
Back from 200 sir 🥳🥳🥳 congrats
No body can give this type of content in free
Aag laga di !!❤️❤️ Never would I have visualised it without this vid
Thank you 🙂
U r op sir........
Congratulations 🎉 1000th subscriber soon!
Congratulations🎉🎉🎉 sir for 1k subscribers and and I wish u have 1M subscribers and more in few days
This was the best video so far sir. I am grateful.
Sir you are too good for indian studs.. That's something I truly feel from my heart
sir loved your level of teaching and the content and the way of teaching
very nice video ............ got the same result sir thank u
First of all thanks for such an explanation, really an eye opener concept...always misunderstood by most of us....
I have one doubt sir...while proving the theorem in mathematics part (time 8:27 to 10:23 ) you have used a subscript with Euler part of angular acceleration, Alpha of (A) i.e; angular acceleration of A ......I think angular acceleration (alpha) used in Euler part will be of rotating frame but not of the object being observed...
Am I right sir or I have made mistake somewhere ?
Yes , you are right 👍🏼🙂. That was typo at 10:00 on my part. In the previous step , I just wrote alpha without subscript. But from next step, upon multiplication of mA term , somehow, I wrote alpha A , and kept carrying it in further steps without any use. Yes alpha and Omega are of the rotating frame itself 🙂👍🏼. Thank you for pointing out 🙏.
@@PHYSICSSIRJEE I am your big admirer...by posting conceptual videos on youtube you have helped so many students and knowledge seekers who cannot contact you and take guidance from you in personal. Please don't stop posting conceptual videos...honest request... 🙏
This is the best video to explain coriolis force.👍💯thank you sir 🙌🙌
Great choice for 100th video sir..
Thank you very much sir...I learnt this rarer concept by viewing this video second time...
Thank you very much sir🥳🥳🥳🥳
This is just beautiful, it is a masterpiece
*Worth*
Sir can you make your videos public, just like for 10-15 minutes please if possible?
i think sir can’t do that scout
tanveeer sharma I’m really hyped for these lectures
i’m equally
sir your content is really great!!!!!!!
Sir you said you would take up some challenging ques from EMI PATHFINDER please sir do take them,A humble request
Congratulations sir
Congratulations sir....I learned proper physics... thank you sir
Wow
Before watching your video, I had used this concept in a problem.
Many people forget to take the effect of rotating frame in the relative motion and establish erroneous equations and thereby find faluty answers with pseudo satisfaction of doing that way.
After watching this video, I am excited to see that atleast someone has mentioned the same concept in a very simple manner.
Thank you 🙂🙏
Thank you sir, amazing concept,mind blowing 🎐✨
In Kleppner and Kolenkow's book: An Introduction to Mechanics, on page 34 on the topic titled "Acceleration in Polar coordinates", it has been mentioned that: "when r and theta both change, then Coriolis acceleration acts which is "real" and is "In contrast" to the Coriolis force which acts in a rotating frame of reference. "
What I'm trying to understand is that:
(1) If we are analyzing the situation using polar coordinate system, then if r and theta both are changing, then Coriolis acceleration that acts (which by the way is real according to Kleppner and Kolenkow), is this Coriolis acceleration different from the Coriolis acceleration that would come into play due to Coriolis force, if we analyze the same situation from a rotating frame of reference ?
(2) Can Coriolis acceleration (real one) and Coriolis acceleration (due to Coriolis force when seen from rotating frame of reference) act simultaneously at a moving body(whose r and theta both are changing with time), if we observe from a rotating frame of reference using polar coordinate system ?
I request you to kindly make a video explaining this, or atleast write your answer as comment here..
dude read the book more clearly , in the book it says that in rotating frame(which perhaps isnt our reference frame or laboratory frame) coriolis force acting isnt real but in the kinematics section .. the paragraph you read particle has some speed , accn , initial position etc , so we are interpreting the equation of motion in polar coordinates that is .. for some accn in cartesian coordinate we break the components of accn in polar coordinates and we get the expression as shown in the video for example 2w*r is the accn in tangential or say transverse direction given that omega is constant. in the book ,we are just interpreting motion of particle in polar coordinates. now in circular motion problems , we consider that the body is moving in some way in our laboratory system , but in the frame of the rotating body the other body let say some other omega relative to itself and then we use the help of polar coordinates to find that relative accn or velocity.hence in the first case the sh*t is real to us but in second case the sh*t is pseudo
@@redsurfer_255 I've read your reply multiple times. However, it still isn't clear to me. Could you kindly elaborate pointwise on the questions in my original post.
Sir miru thopu
Wow telugu
Best video learnt a lot of concepts
excellent sir,keep going,all the best sir jee
Thank you sirji😊❤
Thanks a lot sir ,
All doubts cleared .❤️
Currently in IITP
still watching this for my revision :)
Mind blowing
congo sir really sir very happy for you congrats sir
i can see a lot of effort behind this video yet it would be a delight for any physics lover to watch it truly loved the illustrations
Only 3 physics channels are trending now.
INSP ,physics sir jee and physics with akash goyal❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Thank you sir for your amazing content
1000 subscribers soon sir!!
it feels good to be here from the beginning ✌🏻
U r doing my best wishes
Wow sir maja aa gya pura
Congratulations for 1K subscribers sir 🎉🔥
Sir if the rotating table is itself translating with velocity v , Can we still use the rotating frame in same manner or some other pseudo forces will appear ?
Love from Andhra sir❤️❤️
Well sir
Awesome explaination sir 👍👍 🔥🔥 ......love from Chandigarh 🙂
In which college
Congratulations sir !! This channel deserves to be seen by EVERY physics lover , physics is such a beautiful subject and with you it becomes even more beautiful !! 😊
#75 For My Revision( This video deserves a gold 🏅)
Is this coriolis force and Euler force application on jee advanced sylaabus
sir in euler force the alpha should be of obsever b i think
KIndly explain the difference between coroilis and centrifugal force physically since both are due to rotation effects i.e. also give examples when is coriolis present and centrifugal absent or vice versa, if any.
Also do a full series on topics from basic to advanced level on topic like newtons laws, constraint motion and rotational motion which are the toughest topics.
The points in first paragraph of your comment is completely covered in the long video. Some examples are provided and some more , I will do in a future video
Coming to the second paragraph of your comment , it's a very good suggestion 👍🙂. I will definitely take it up in near future. please kindly stay tuned 🙏
Thank you so much sir
😊👏
What a nice video sir!
Sir I have a doubt if I may ask, shall be really thankful if you would clarify in ur free time.
What exactly is relative angular velocity if two objects are moving on concentric circles? Is it (w1-w2) ?
or is it (V1-V2)/ (r1-r2) ? {r1,r2 being position vectors}
Two of them are giving different answers and a few searches on internet has further confused me a lot.
Neither if two objects are points, it's (Vrel perpendicular to Rrel)/Rrel
@@PHYSICSSIRJEE Ok sir, actually second case was this only , could not frame here in comment correctly.
Thanks a lot sir, I got the clarity now.
@@PHYSICSSIRJEE Sir here as points don't rotate u have neglected the Wa term
But if it's two people then will it be[ Vrel trans -Wa(distance between them) ]/perpendicular distance between them
Here I am initially taking the case when their velocities are parallel
And Wa refers angular velocity of frame of reference particle
Also what if it's mentioned as particles do we consider them to be points or people
Sir how to use your channel as a dropper I am enrolled in a coaching and preparing for jee 2022 from scratch and I watched one of your videos and I was shocked how clearly and greatly explain tough concept 😁
thank you sir
Sir @20:00 can u pls tell how centrifugal force is in horizontal direction
i am confused coz in formula, it was -ma wx(wxrab) but rab is not horizontal since the object is behind the line of sight of obeserver
then how horzontal force can act
Also sir jee I am curious to know your daily routine
The same concept when I read in David Morin introduction to mechanics there are many things which are misunderstood but now I understood very well thank you sir love from south india
Concept of Coriolis Force ...... I dont know why give me a little dizziness
Sir pls clear some of my doubts regarding this topic :
1) What is the difference between a translatory frame and rotatory frame can we not have perpendicular velocities in a translatory frame if yes then our line of sight is rotating itself doesn’t it become a rotatory frame ..? How do we differentiate bw the two I am not able to understand this.. does translatory means we can only have velocities along the line of sight .? And lastly if my line of sight is rotating and I’m myself rotating does this means same. .? I need to clear these doubts then only I’ll be able to understand coriolis and other pseudo forces
You can watch the previous resolved video mentioned (check in description) at the start to understand the difference between translating and Rotating frames...
If doubt persists you can DM me in my app, I can explain using audio message when I am free, instead of typing message here🙂
Sir in your theory will observer in frame B (rotating frame ) observes path of particle A to be straight line along vector rab.
Time stamp please ?
So for the last scenario, we saw that stationary person B seemed to be rotating in radius r_2 circle in the frame of the rotating observer. But my question is when both come at a minimum distance, i.e. (r_2 -r_1), then how is it possible for a rotating observer to measure this distance as r_2? Please help me here!
At 26:00 , the OBSERVER A doesn't see B to be rotating in circle with "A" as center . He observes him to be in circle of radius R2 with center at centre of turntable. It's like observing a circular motion from an off-center Point
Sir if a ball is rotating around a string then we say that acceleration of ball is mrw² outward w.r t rotating frame but according to theory discussed in video acceleration of ball w.r.t to rotating body should be F real+F pseudo=-mrw²+mrw²(centrifugal force due to rotation of the centre.then sir why the earlier one is wrong.i am pretty confused.
Sir please clear the doubt I am pretty confused
Centrifugal depends on where is the rotating frame in your example on the string
@@PHYSICSSIRJEE sir I am taking centre of the circle as the rotating frame
@@twistedargument4308 then centrifugal force is mrw^2 and linear pseudo force term is zero.
But , if observer is at midpoint , then centrifugal force and linear pseudo force term each are mrw^2/2 but total pseudo force is still mrw^2.
Pick your observer rigidly attached to any point, the centrifugal and linear pseudo force term individually Change but total pseudo force is Same
@@PHYSICSSIRJEE yes sir ,if body is rotating around centre then w.r.t to centre fnet=0(f real+f pseudo),n??
At 7:25 I have difficulty in understanding the 3rd step .... we wrote differentiation of (Vab)r , of the 2 terms the first one should be differentiation of rotating vector (Vab)r in rotating frame , however is differentiation of (Vab)r and (Vab)t same ? I know that there will be difference in second term involving omega however would the first term be same . I also had doubt in visualizing (Vab)r as a rotating vector , is it like a tangent going around a circle with centre at observer ?
Yeah nice question bro,is differentiation of Va/b in Translation same as in rotating frame i.e Va/b(rotating frame)
@@rjaph842 Do you know the reason ?
@@rishabhshetty4304 i also can't understand why he did that,i was hoping he can reply
@@rjaph842 Ok , Join discord you may ask there .
@@rishabhshetty4304 I don't get, what's discord and how do i join?
Sir at 28:59 the turn table is moving anticlockwise with omega so you considerd omega to B as outwards. Sir i didnt understand this pls can you explain.
Oh sorry sir i understood . It seems i m sleepy
Sir (20:05), you have mentioned that the relative velocity is away from from observer in rotating frame. You have taken vrel as horizontal. Could you please explain it. Why vrel is nt the vector difference between two velocity
Explained in the previous video as mentioned . Link in description
Sir aap unaccademy pr aaye ge...!..
sir in second illustration (21:00) sir waha total force wrt to rotating observer me euler force ke alwa sab force ayegena???..........,,,,,,, And sir centripetal force jab particle circuler motion karta he tab ham toward center lagate....so ese centrifugal force kab kab lagna hota he...jese coriolis force tab lagate he jab rotating observer and particle ke bich relative motion ho vese centrifugal kab lagate he?.......ya fir rotating observe ke fram me always centrifugal force lagna hota he?
🙏🙏
Answer to first line of your comment : Yes ✅
Answer to the last line of your comment : Yes✅
@@PHYSICSSIRJEE ok thank you sir 🙂🙂
Sir in iroovar cone rotation problem you had mentioned da/dt=a x w but here we have done as da/dt = a x w + the normal term we would get by differentiating a where a is rotating vector
In the irodov cone problem , I did not consider a Rotating frame attached to the axis . In this video , during differentiation , I mentioned it was about a Rotating frame
sorry sir for not being attentive and being silly. Thank you for clarifying@@PHYSICSSIRJEE
Cant explain how frustated i was i thought of this frame at my own but was confused that if we dont consider that rotational factor in relative velocity how can we get a fx ,it was literally amazing sir
I am glad you finally cracked it👍🙂
Sir pls clear this small doubt at 5:47 how did u write rate of change of rAB as VA-Vb as length would only change if the velocities are along r vector suppose if velocities are perpendicular to position vector then dr/dt shells be zero but it gives a value how sir?
It's a good doubt 🙂. What you said is right if it was rate of change of MAGNITUDE of rAB , but it was rate of change of vector rAB , then net velocity vectors should be considered and not just the components along rAB
@@PHYSICSSIRJEE thnku so much sir ❤️
Sir hoping for a Collab soon with nitin sir
Help here sir,in 7:25,you are taking differentiation of Va/b in rotating frame to be equivalent to differentiation of Va/b in translating term, kindly shed light there sir
There are two terms after differentiation in performing d/dt of Va,b in rotating frame.
sir one help sir.., can u please solve Q 1.216 in irodov sir .., I'm really confused with the concept involved sir..,
Please sir .., please
Check step -1 of this Solution. It's on gravitational pressure 👇
czcams.com/video/iaZr0UycNGM/video.html
Sir i hope you can be eligible for monitisation please do it sir you will get upto 1,64,235.7988 ruppes
sir but w(omega) wrt boy of that another outside boy will be downside so why you directed it upwrds@29:15
I didn't mark Omega , I marked Vrel .
Eyes of A in the figure are ROTATING anti-clockwise , so he will see B moving with the combination of red and green velocity components marked in diagram.
I suggest you to please go through the previous Resolved VIDEO to understand relative velocity in ROTATING frame. It was mentioned at start of this video. Link is in description.
@@PHYSICSSIRJEE sir i mean into the plane by mistake I wrote it downside I am talking about omega only that it will be inside the plane not coming out of the plane
@@thermmech4835 anticlockwise Omega is out of the plane , right?
@@PHYSICSSIRJEE sir but out of plane is for first rotating object but if see for other object(B) it will have inward i mean "into the plane" omega
@@thermmech4835 relative Omega doesn't work like relative v . It's a pseudo vector. Also relative Omega was not written in the solution. That's why, please Watch, the previous video to this Completely as mentioned in the description to get better clarity.
All the best 👍🙂
ohh itna types ka pseudo forces hota h kya.... in 8 yrs of teaching i knew that transaltional and coriolisi only
I was the hundrenth person to like it
Haha
janardhan sir can u plz tell me the method to find the depth of vertex of a hanging catenary(question given in pathfinder nlm)
@Puspal Paul yaa thank u for telling me i have actually seen it i posted this doubt before sir uploaded that video
1000 subscriber soon sir ..
We love you sir. 😊
Wow