When I watch your videos I really amazed that I have to know many things that I don't know. I'm just 17 years old but I can understand your teaching very clearly
Sir I requested you to see my previous comment in the video of " Erwin schordiger part 1" in that comment I told about the clear thought of my first concept so I want from you to go and see my comment and then give some comments by You about my concept it is my humble request please please please 😢😢😢accept it, and also give a reply of whether my concept is correct or wrong Before you see my previous comment I want to introduce one concept that is the inverse proportionality concept of mc²and hf energies in this case if the mc² is inversaly proportional to hf then one of the coefficient is need to equal the equation it is denote as (β+1)it can be expressed as mc² is inversaly proportional to hf then mc²= (β+1)/hf For the value of β+1 then the eq is changed as mc²×hf=(β+1) h=mvL as per the de broglie eq then mc²×mvL×f=(β+1) V=l×f as lambda ×frequency then m²v×vc²=β+1=m²v²c² Therefore the coefficient is (β+1)=(mcv)² By its dimensions eq (ML²/T²)² we concluded that it is one of the energy but it act as a coefficient in this concept. And by this concept l can rewrite or express a new wave nature like de-broglie Let derivation for the wave nature is (β+1)=(mcv)² (β+1)=((h/L×v)cV)²as by the de-broglie eq (β+1)=((h/L)c)² for the value of lambda is 1/L²=(β+1)/h²c² then L²=(hc)²/β+1 as taking square on both sides for L is L=hc/√(β+1) From the above eq was multiple by c/c then L= hc²/c√(β+1) And the above eq is multiple by p/p=mv/mv then L=hc²×mv/mvc×√(β+1) For the value of β+1=(mvc)²sub in L then L=hc²mv/(β+1) L =(hc²)p/(β+1) The above eq implise that the lambda is inversaly proportional to coefficient of energy and directly proportional to p=mv which need to equal this eq I use my constant hc²will required. this wave nature will occur when the two energies were inversaly proportional to each other. This is the another point view of wave nature was I supposed and sir,give the reply for what you rate about this concept like it is worth or not .this concept was made in my point of view and it may be exists in reality or not exist .
Schrodinger இன் பூனை... புலியாக மாறி வேகம் எடுத்த மாதிரி.... 2 நாட்களுக்குள் அடுத்த பதிவு ..... Good work
😂இதுக்காகவே சீக்ரம் அடுத்த வீடியோ ready பண்ணனும் போலயே
Nice work sir
When I watch your videos I really amazed that I have to know many things that I don't know. I'm just 17 years old but I can understand your teaching very clearly
Super bro.. awaiting next episode
Keeping going sir, interesting series....
பயன் உள்ள தகவல் நன்றி🎉
♥️
Great work.....keep going sir
Thanks sir ❤
I’d love to watch your videos and amount of efforts you put in. Please upload videos regularly, Thank you.
♥️thank you
❤❤🎉 well come anna
Thanks Sam.. I hope you shall think about a series of Boltzmann!!
Nice sir
Jesus is the king of kings 3
Jesus bless your family Sir
How to become a scientist video pooduga
இர்வின் ஸ்க்ரோடிஞ்ஞர் இருசன் சொரிமுத்து ஐயனார் என்பதன் திரிபு.
First comment 🎉
Thank you
talk about Tesla number anna pls
Good work🎉
♥️
Cathode ray explanation
Sir I requested you to see my previous comment in the video of " Erwin schordiger part 1" in that comment I told about the clear thought of my first concept so I want from you to go and see my comment and then give some comments by You about my concept it is my humble request please please please 😢😢😢accept it, and also give a reply of whether my concept is correct or wrong
Before you see my previous comment I want to introduce one concept that is the inverse proportionality concept of mc²and hf energies in this case if the mc² is inversaly proportional to hf then one of the coefficient is need to equal the equation it is denote as (β+1)it can be expressed as
mc² is inversaly proportional to hf then
mc²= (β+1)/hf
For the value of β+1 then the eq is changed as
mc²×hf=(β+1)
h=mvL as per the de broglie eq then
mc²×mvL×f=(β+1)
V=l×f as lambda ×frequency then
m²v×vc²=β+1=m²v²c²
Therefore the coefficient is
(β+1)=(mcv)²
By its dimensions eq (ML²/T²)² we concluded that it is one of the energy but it act as a coefficient in this concept.
And by this concept l can rewrite or express a new wave nature like de-broglie
Let derivation for the wave nature is
(β+1)=(mcv)²
(β+1)=((h/L×v)cV)²as by the de-broglie eq
(β+1)=((h/L)c)² for the value of lambda is
1/L²=(β+1)/h²c² then
L²=(hc)²/β+1 as taking square on both sides for L is
L=hc/√(β+1)
From the above eq was multiple by c/c then
L= hc²/c√(β+1)
And the above eq is multiple by p/p=mv/mv then
L=hc²×mv/mvc×√(β+1)
For the value of β+1=(mvc)²sub in L then
L=hc²mv/(β+1)
L =(hc²)p/(β+1)
The above eq implise that the lambda is inversaly proportional to coefficient of energy and directly proportional to p=mv which need to equal this eq I use my constant hc²will required. this wave nature will occur when the two energies were inversaly proportional to each other. This is the another point view of wave nature was I supposed and sir,give the reply for what you rate about this concept like it is worth or not .this concept was made in my point of view and it may be exists in reality or not exist .
Hi bro