Creality Scan Otter Vs Raptor - Black and Metallic Object

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 3. 06. 2024
  • Here's my comparison review of these 2 scanners with black, glossy and metallic object.
    Raptor is scanned in laser mode
    Otter is scanned in NIR small object dept camera
    Here's the link for marker target. (Sketchfab)
    skfb.ly/oUKzC
    Marker 30 deg
    skfb.ly/oUNEO
    Marker 60 deg
    skfb.ly/oUNFx
    Maker long distance target
    skfb.ly/oURvQ
    #creality #3dscanner #crscan #otter #raptor

Komentáře • 19

  • @android4cg
    @android4cg Před 23 dny +2

    Excellent comparison! Want to see more. ;-)

  • @stevesloan6775
    @stevesloan6775 Před 21 dnem +1

    I’d love to see a comparison between the NIR scanning on both scanners.
    Thank you so much for this great content.
    I’m trying to decide which scanner to buy at the moment.
    🇦🇺😎🤜🏼🤛🏼☮️🍀

  • @MA-qx6rn
    @MA-qx6rn Před 19 dny +1

    brilliant content! ive been waiting for this, thanks

  • @asafianski
    @asafianski Před 22 dny +1

    Thanks, great comparison. For next video maybe compare NIR mode in both scanners and scan something bigger? Blue laser for sure is better for small objects like on this video, but how about bigger things without markers? :)

    • @Payo-TensileCreator
      @Payo-TensileCreator  Před 20 dny +1

      For bigger object without marker, Otter is far more better than Raptor. The large object dept camera has a very big scanning area. Much bigger than Revopoint Range 2 and it can see black and reflective.

  • @DaVinci1_0
    @DaVinci1_0 Před 21 dnem

    Thank you for the comparison video.

  • @kareldvo
    @kareldvo Před 23 dny

    Calc spray will help a lot

  • @andytom1969
    @andytom1969 Před 21 dnem

    congratulations on the report! we are still too much in manual mode...I would like to buy one of these but how much effort and how many variables are needed to obtain something that is not definitive and which then still needs to be modeled...is it possible we are still at this level?

  • @AndreyBulgakov
    @AndreyBulgakov Před 23 dny

    Thank you for your tests! May I ask you the exact size of the markers? Inner ring 1mm and outer ring 3mm?

    • @Payo-TensileCreator
      @Payo-TensileCreator  Před 23 dny +1

      The small one is 3mm ID and 6mm OD. The bigger one is 6mm ID and 10mm OD

  • @jeorane
    @jeorane Před 23 dny

    Great review. Please, if possible, make a full human body scan with Otter and Ferret and compare the time of the entire process.

  • @ravit7255
    @ravit7255 Před 23 dny

    What configuration laptop you using (RAM & ROM, graphic card) It will help us alot.

    • @Payo-TensileCreator
      @Payo-TensileCreator  Před 23 dny +1

      CPU is Ryzen 9 8945H, 32 GB or RAM and GPU is RTX 4070 8 GB of VRAM. I think you should be OK with RTX 4060 laptop. I found that it has no hiccup and smooth scanning experience, same as my desktop workstation.

  • @user-sx4zh1li1u
    @user-sx4zh1li1u Před 21 dnem

    Raptor is not bad for the black & reflective surface. But bad for metalic surface.
    When you scanned a bottom part, I found lots of noise data on the metalic surface. What's your opinion ?

    • @Payo-TensileCreator
      @Payo-TensileCreator  Před 21 dnem +1

      The scanned object has high contrast surface, black that absorb light and metallic that reflect light. If it's all black or all metallic (not mirror like) it would be easier for the scanners to pickup. Raptor dose a bit better in this case.

  • @xile6
    @xile6 Před 23 dny

    You dont need markers on it

    • @Payo-TensileCreator
      @Payo-TensileCreator  Před 23 dny

      Raptor yes, it will see markers on the mat and still track, but Otter likely to see less markers and fail to track without markers on the object and it also can't track this feature less object in geometry mode.