ASTM Test Reveals AMSOIL Improves Fuel Economy 6.54%
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 09. 2024
- The Ford Motor Company recently partnered with AMSOIL Synthetics in a rigid ASTM test to see what kind of fuel economy improvements could be realized using AMSOIL synthetic lubricants in over the road trucks. The results startled Ford Company personnel.
Buy Amsoil directly at this link: www.TheLubePage...
Ask Dan a question: TheLubePage.co...
E-mail Dan directly: DanWatson@TheLubePage.com
Check out the Lube Page Podcast: / @thelubepagepodcast6961
In 1984 in New Zealand, I was running a company car, a 1985 Nissan Sunny Sports Waggon with a 1.3 litre manual 5 speed. I was changing my oil every 5,000 km and doing 70,00 km a year so changes were often. I came across Mobil 1 with a 40,000 km warranty and I was very skeptical but decided to try it.
I kept it in the vehicle for 10,000 km, twice the length and as the oil cost twice as much, it worked out about the same cost.
I really looked after my company car and I would not let anyone abuse it and I kept detailed records for myself for fuel usage and any other costs. Over that time, I had an improvement of 7% of fuel usage, similar to yours, by just changing my oil. And the mechanic told me the engine was exceptionally clean and the oil was not black. A good oil
On a visit to the Agricultural Feild Days in Mystery Creek, I came across and Amsoil stand, and now I knew Amsoil was great oil.
I signed up as a dealer and at my own expense, I installed a full system of Amsoil on the company car.
10w-40 25k engine oil, 75w-90 gear lube, an Amsoil oiled foam air filter and a 6 inch Amsoil by-pass oil filter. This was a depth type filter that went in a canister, the original type and messy to clean.
Now I had a 14% improvement in fuel economy.
I did about 40,000 km when the car was involved in an accident at a speed just less than 120 kph and the car was written off. But the car protected me and I walked away with just a torn muscle.
I was able to recover the by-pass filter and the air filter from he wreck and installed it on my new car. along the new fill of Amsoil and gear box oil.
I wrote a detailed report to my manager showing what I had done [at my own cost] and pointed out the benefits and savings the company would make over the life of the vehicle. I don't remember the actual benefits and savings, but it was considerable and worthwhile. My vehicle always looked the best in the fleet, because I looked after it.
I had a report back "No unauthorised modifications to the vehicle."
I continued with what I was doing and the company thought I had gone back to 5,000 km changes, but I hadn't, so I was repaid.
Later in my own Nissan Sunny, I installed the dual remote, full flow and by-pass in series. and the air filter. I averaged 6.3 liters per 100 km or about 42 miles per gallon. Tha was with imperial gallons so 4.45 litres,different to your 3.8.
I did change to a Honda Shuttle for a while, but never again. I had a Nissan Pulsar 1.6 manual
Amsoil pulled out of NZ in 2004. I was a lifetime dealer, mainly for myself and friends as I am not a great salesman but I am passionate about it. But I bought new oil, 0w-30 for better fuel economy. and a dual foam air filter which I used for 10 years until I had the car towed away. I also use PI in 3.8 litres which ran out a couple of years ago.
I now use exclusively top quality synthetics or top known brands. I am not sure about the Sinopec, but I will have to look the up.
My first automatic car, andI have owned one since 1967, have all been manual transmissions. My first auto was two years ago a 1.3 Mazda Demo (Mazda2). I am getting around 8 l/100km around town and 6.8 on trips compared to the 1.6 Nissan Pulsar 1.6 manual 5 speed. I averaged about 6.2 L/100 km in the city, but never in peak traffic in a heavier, larger engined car with stick shift that the auto Demeo.
Thaks for your very informative talks.
That's what I've always said - people who have to commute long distances and people who lead extremely busy lives are crazy if they don't use the Amsoil.