Your subtle explanation has rather confused me more. In attempt to justify the issue you've excallated it. 1. You failed to mention your name but had the nerves to mention that of the radio presenter. 2. Hearts of oak acquired the property before it was encroached 3. Togbe paid for the Said apartment. Now, the question is; is the property for Togbe as a person or for hearts of oak as an entity? Waiting for response
Well noted
Asem ooo
This is a report from one of the workers at pobiman not Bryto tv reporter please
Your subtle explanation has rather confused me more. In attempt to justify the issue you've excallated it. 1. You failed to mention your name but had the nerves to mention that of the radio presenter. 2. Hearts of oak acquired the property before it was encroached 3. Togbe paid for the Said apartment. Now, the question is; is the property for Togbe as a person or for hearts of oak as an entity? Waiting for response